JPNR - S08 - 62
JPNR - S08 - 62
JPNR - S08 - 62
1
Dr.L.KESAVAN, 2Mrs.S.DHIVYA
1
Assistant Professor, PG and Research Department of Commerce, Kandaswami Kandar’s College , P.Velur Tk, Namakkal Dt
2
Research Scholar, PG and Research Department of Commerce, Kandaswami Kandar’s College, P.Velur Tk, Namakkal Dt
Email: dhivvia@gmail.com
DOI: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S08.62
Abstract
The study aimed to identify the causes of employee attrition and determine which factors influence attrition. The descriptive
research design is suitable for the study. The population of this study comprises private-sector employees. A simple random
sampling technique is adopted, and the researcher can only collect a maximum of 86 samples. The instrument will be used to
evaluate the quantitative approaches in the survey. The study found that salary affects employee attrition highly. Besides, the
ANOVA result shows no difference between the causes of employee attrition and the demographic profile of respondents. The
study concluded that organizations must take staff turnover seriously and have a strategy for reducing attrition.
Introduction
The rapidly increasing need for professional workers in the twenty-first century, which began in the second part
of the first decade, has resulted in high employee turnover, one of the numerous employee-related concerns that
plague organizations with high turnover. Employers are concerned about the impact of a high turnover rate on
organizational efficiency and the necessity for ongoing recruitment and accompanying expenses. They are also
concerned about the ongoing cost of recruitment. Typically, an employee stays with the same employer throughout
their career. People frequently work for the same company their entire careers.
Similarly, the employer must provide him with work until he achieves his professional and personal objectives. It
entails both parties developing and changing the framework of their relationship and engaging in mutual,
reciprocal exchanges. This relationship is uncertain for both the employee and the employer. Both parties may
have contributed to the partnership’s demise. Employee attrition is an increasing concern for all types of
businesses. Employee attrition is costly for all firms. Companies must successfully manage their qualified and
experienced staff in today’s competitive business market. To keep employees, the sector concentrates on raising
wages. Any team leader who handles a lot of personnel faces difficulties. The majority of managers are not trained
to reduce employee turnover. Businesses perceive attrition adversely since it implies losing talented employees.
Attrition is only one problem. Employees leave with a wide range of skills and certificates. Each manager loses
12 to 18 months of income, and each employee loses 4 to 6 months.
Research problem
This study is being conducted to determine the various causes of employee attrition in the organization. It is
important to figure out why so many people leave an organization so quickly.
Review of literature
Shashikala and Ravindra (2013) studied the influence of employee attrition on corporate productivity. According
to the findings, businesses must develop empathy for their employees and establish more reliable and stable
relationships. The high objective of extraordinarily minimal employee attrition is unattainable. They should take
an emotional approach to the few issues that need to be handled. This is undeniably an endeavour that any
Research gaps
Several studies on employee attrition and labour turnover completed in recent years were evaluated. It was
determined that numerous researchers are investigating the causes and effects of employee attrition in numerous
industries with diverse socio-demographic backgrounds. However, none of the studies has focused on the factors
contributing to employee attrition. As a result, the researcher identified this as a research gap, and to answer it, he
selected this particular topic and did this research.
Research Methodology
The descriptive research design is suitable for the study. The population of this study comprises private-sector
employees. Samples from Chennai were considered. The selection of these samples is based on probability
sampling. The study’s samples were randomly selected. The primary benefit of adopting random sampling
methods is that they are easily available at any given time and location and are cost-effective. Due to time and
budget constraints, the researcher can only collect a maximum of 86 samples. Following this, quantitative methods
are used to select which research procedures will be employed to conduct an investigation. The instrument will
be used to evaluate the quantitative approaches in the survey. The questionnaire comprises multiple-choice and
five-point Likert scale items. In addition to creating the questionnaire in Google Forms, the researcher provided
links to all approved respondents. The respondents completed the questionnaire willingly.
Data analysis
The table shows that the highest number of respondents belong to the age group of 26 to 35 years (51.2%). In
contrast, the second highest number of respondents belong to the age group of less than 25 years (45.3%), and the
least number of respondents belong to the age groups of 36 to 45 years and 46 to 55 years. Among 86 respondents,
59 (68.6%) were male, whereas 27 (31.4%) were female. It is found that the highest number of respondents are
males. Also, most respondents have a postgraduate degree (48.8%), followed by 47.7% of respondents having a
graduate degree, 2.3% having a doctorate, and 1.2% indicating others. However, it shows that the highest number
of respondents are from nuclear families (77.9%). In addition, it indicates that 23.3% of respondents are working
at a low level, followed by 70.9% of respondents working at a middle level and 5.8% of respondents working at
a high level. It is then concluded that most respondents are working at the middle level.
It notes that the cost of recruitment highly affects the organization. Secondly, the respondents indicate the effect
of project delivery by 18.6%. Thirdly, the reputation of the organization affects the organization by 12.8%. Lastly,
the cost of training is lost, and the knowledge leakage to other organizations affects the organization by 7% and
1.2%. Then, it can be inferred that most people who answered the question said that the cost of recruitment affects
the organization.
The table above shows that 67.4% of respondents indicate that salary affects employee attrition, whereas 19.8%
of respondents indicate the lack of work-life balance and stress, 10.5% of respondents indicate job dissatisfaction,
It observes that dissatisfaction with pay is the most avoidable cause of employee attrition. The second highest
avoidable causes are unsuitable working hours, followed by job nature and non-cooperative attitude. In contrast,
the least avoidable causes are problems with HR and the company’s location. Also, the average for avoidable
causes ranges from 3.18 to 3.74. Thus, dissatisfaction with pay has the highest mean value of 3.74, whereas the
location of the company has the least mean value of 3.18. It is then concluded that dissatisfaction with pay is the
most avoidable cause of employee attrition.
It indicates that the highest number of respondents indicates the employee’s roving nature is the unavoidable cause
of employee attrition. In contrast, health issues or accidents and family problems are the second and third highest
unavoidable causes, and marriage is the least unavoidable cause. Also, the average for unavoidable causes ranges
from 2.70 to 3.04. Thus, the employee’s roving nature has the highest mean value of 3.04, whereas the marriage
has the least mean value of 2.70. It shows that the highest mean value indicates higher precision.
The ANOVA shows that the F-statistics of age secures to be 1.387, whereas education is 0.984, designation level
is 0.145, and the significance value is higher than 5%, respectively. Hence, it concludes that the stated null
hypothesis is accepted. Therefore, the result infers that the causes of employee attrition do not differ based on the
respondents’ demographic profile.
It is found from the above table that the female respondents secure the highest mean value of 2.44, whereas the
male respondents have the mean value of 2.05. It is evident that the calculated f-value is 0.001 and the p-value is
0.975, which means that the value is greater than 5% and is not statistically significant. Hence, the null hypothesis
is accepted and shows that the causes of employee attrition differed based on the gender of respondents.
H0: Causes of employee attrition are not differed based on the family type of respondents
H3: Causes of employee attrition differed based on the family type of respondents
Conclusions
The study aimed to identify the causes of employee attrition and determine which factors influence attrition. The
study found that most of the respondents are aged 26 to 35 years, male, and have a postgraduate degree. The
empirical findings show that the respondents work at a middle level. However, the cost of recruitment attrition
affects the organization, and salary affects employee attrition. The study reveals that dissatisfaction with pay
indicates highly avoidable causes, and employees’ roving nature indicates highly unavoidable causes. The
ANOVA result shows no difference between the causes of employee attrition and the demographic profile of
respondents. The study concluded that organizations must take staff turnover seriously and have a strategy for
reducing attrition.
References
1. Kadam, V. S., & Thakar, H. M. (2014). A study of Attrition in IT industries in Pune. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(3),
650-656.
2. Jeen, S. B. D., & Batty, S. (2014). A study on attrition–turnover intentions in the retail industry. International Journal of Business and
Administration Research Review, 1(3), 55-61.
3. Shashikala, S., & Ravindra, S. (2013). A study on causes & control techniques for attrition rate in Indian industry. Asia Pacific Journal
of Research, 2(4).
4. Chaudhary, N. S. (2013). Attrition in the education industry. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social
Sciences, 2(11), 151-115.
5. Negi, G. (2013). Employee attrition: Inevitable yet manageable. International Monthly Refereed Journal of Research In Management &
Technology, 2(1).
6. Ampomah, P., & Cudjor, S. K. (2015). The effect of employee turnover on organizations (a case study of electricity company of Ghana,
Cape Coast). Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 2(1), 21-24.
7. Sudha, P., Prasannakumaran, C., & Aswini, M. M. (2015). An empirical analysis of employee retention policies of selected, organized
retailers with special reference to Salem city, Tamilnadu. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review, 4(1), 24-35.
8. Pillai, R., Mamidi, R. T., & Kuchibhotla, H. (2016). A Study of Employee Turnover and Retention Strategies in Organized Retail in
Pune City. MERC Global’s International Journal of Social Science & Management, 3(3), 83-87.