Apl412 Gumallaoi Judelle v. RNW-MT 01
Apl412 Gumallaoi Judelle v. RNW-MT 01
The title of this chapter presents a dilemma. This dilemma is caused by the
tension between the desire to practice an art form based upon method and
principle, while, at the same time, involving people actively in the design process.
In any dispute between the views of the people and the professionals which
takes precedence? In Battle this dilemma was made manifest when an individual
occupying a property in The Crescent wished to paint her door yellow. The
professional view considered that all doors in John Wood junior` s great piece of
Classical urban architecture should be white.
The aim of this chapter is not to solve this dilemma but, more simply, to make it
apparent and to set theoretical ground rules for incorporating public
participation into the urban design process. The dilemma will not disappear, but it
may be that the resolution of the tensions will stimulate creative design. Civilized life
is made more pleasure able by a shared understanding of simple rules of
conduct. Later he writes: People should be involved willingly from the beginning in
the improvement of their surroundings but participation cannot be imposed: it has to
start from the bottom up.
Urban design, or the art of building cities, is the method by which man creates
a built environment that fulfils his aspirations and represents his values. This he
does in his own likeness, The sixteenth century theorist and architect John Shute
likens the city to the human figure: A city ought to be like the human body and for
this reason it should be full of all that gives life to man. Urban design, like its sister
art architecture, is a people’s use of an accumulated technological knowledge to
control and adapt the environment for social, economic, political and religious
requirements. It is the method learned and used by a people to solve the total
program of requirements for city building. The city is an element of a people` s
spiritual and physical culn1re and, indeed, it is one of the highest expressions of
that culture.
Central to the study of urban design is man, his values, aspirations and power
or ability to achieve them. The task of the city builder is to understand and
express, in built form, the needs and aspirations of the client group. How does the
city builder design to best serve the community` s needs?
Experience from the recent past, in this and many other countries, is littered
with well-intentioned, but totally unsuitable, developments. Development that range
from the faceless mass housing of the 1960’s to the large-scale office blocks or
commercial areas which totally destroy the intimate fabric of the city. Yet Shute,
one of the country’s earliest theorists and author of the first English
architectural book, recognized that all buildings have a natural lifespan then they
need to be replaced, sometimes with reluctance: ` You can say one eats, and even so
dies. The building must also decline through time just as one person dies sooner than
another or has better or poorer health. Copying features from past
architectural styles is once again in vogue among city builders around the world;
as if the planting of an onion dome, a minaret or horseshoe arch will, of them,
convert a barren design into culturally acceptable development.
The anarchy of the Post-Modern movement in architecture, with its dependence
upon cliché and eclectic use of symbols from the past, must, if progress is to he
made, give way to a more rational approach to architectural design steeped in
discipline and method. Urban design, too, requires a return to its roots in method.
Central to such a return to method is the relationship between designer and client.
In traditional practice the architect worked for an individual or a small group
representing a landed proprietor, the Church Commissioners, a company or
government department. The individual client is a vestige of the past: a time when
architect and client shared the same culture, values and may even have been on the
same Grande tour.
The role of designers is also to stop cities from being exclusively consumer
spaces and shopping centres. Cities should be living spaces that encourage
exchanges and encounters that are accessible to all.
THIS way of looking at the design process for an inidivual building can be
extended to include urban design, town planning.
The products of urban design may differ in every era, but the process stays
the same. It is a kaleidoscope producing maddeningly complex patterns from the
overlap of three not very transparent forces: politics, finance, and design.