Lac Form

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII-SOCCSKSARGEN
Schools Division Office of Cotabato
EVALUATION TOOL FOR LAC
(Demo Teaching)
Name (Optional)_________________________________________________________
School_____________________________________ Grade Level:_________________
Name of Activity____________________________ Date of Activity______________
Directions: Rate the following items using the scale below. Please put a
check mark(√)on the column that corresponds to your answer.
4- Strongly Agree 3-Agree 2-Disagree1-Strongly Disagree NA-Not Applicable
SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS 4 3 2 1 NA
1. Session started on time
2. Session ended on time
3. Topic was relevant to our work.
4. The activities achieved the objectives
5. The activities developed and enhanced skills/
talents/ knowledge of the participants.
6. The activities were designed appropriately
for its purpose
7. The participants were responsive and well
engaged
8. The participants understood the relevance of
the activity in relation to their respective
work/tasks.
9. Time allotment was adequate.
10. Constructive feedback were given to the
teacher demonstrator
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
1. LAC was delivered as planned
2. LAC was managed efficiently
3. LAC was well structured
MEALS AND SNACKS
1. Meals and snacks were satisfactory quality
and sufficient
2. Meals and snacks were served on time
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS
Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

Cotabato Provincial Capitol Compound Telefax No.: (064) 577-7017
Amas, Kidapawan City Website: www.depedcotabatodivision.com
We 9400
Page 1 of 12
LAC SESSION EVALUATION TOOL

(for LAC members and school head to accomplish)
Name of Facilitator:____________________________________ Gender________

Position:____________________________ Designation______________________
Disability___________________________ Ethnic Group____________________
Rating Scale
1--Observed 0 % to 20% of the time
2--Observed 21%-40% of the time
3--Observe 41% -60% of the time
4--Observed 61%-80% of the time
5--Observed 81% - 100% of the time
Description 1 2 3 4 5 Remarks
Ite
m
1 Induction procedures are

appropriate
2 Topic is clearly defined
3 Instruction are clear and
appropriate.
4 Presentation flow is
chronological and systematic
5 Verbal and nonverbal
communication are used
effectively.
6 There is mastery of content.
7 There is evidence of ICT
integration.
8 Rapport is established
resulting to a warm and
friendly atmosphere.
Overall Rating

We 9400
Page 2 of 12

(Group Learning)
Name (Optional)_____________________________________
School:______________________________________________ Grade Level:________
Name of Activity:_________________________________Date of Activity__________
check mark (√) on the column that corresponds to your answer.
5- Strongly Agree 3-Agree 2-Disagree 1-Strongly Disagree NA-Not Applicable

1. Session started on time.
2. Session ended on time.
3. Topic was relevant to our work.
4. Objectives of the session were achieved.
5. The groupings were appropriate to meet needs of
the members
6. Participants listened attentively to their peers.
7. Participants were engaged in activities.
8. Facilitators was skillful in drawing out
knowledge and insight from other group
members.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
1. LAC was delivered as planed
2. LAC was managed efficiently
3. LAC was well structured
MEALS AND SNACKS
1. Meals/ Snacks were satisfactory quality and
sufficient.
2. Meals/ Snacks were served on time.
COMMENTS/ SUGGESTIONS:

We 9400
Page 3 of 12

(Workshop)
Name (Optional)_____________________________________
School:______________________________________________ Grade Level:________
Name of Activity:_________________________________Date of Activity__________
check mark (√) on the column that corresponds to your answer.
6- Strongly Agree 3-Agree 2-Disagree 1-Strongly Disagree NA-Not Applicable

1. Session started on time.
2. Session ended on time.
3. Session gave clarity on what to produce as our
output for the session.
4. Workshop was relevant in our delivery of KRA’s.
5. Facilitators was knowledgeable in handling
questions asked by the participants.
6. Participants were actively involved in doing the
tasks..
7. Participants observed punctuality in their
attendance.
8. Participants demonstrated promptness in
submission of output.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
1. Workshop was delivered as planed
2. Workshop was managed efficiently
3. Workshop was well structured
MEALS AND SNACKS
1. Meals/ Snacks were satisfactory quality and
sufficient.
2. Meals/ Snacks were served on time.
COMMENTS/ SUGGESTIONS:

We 9400
Page 4 of 12
PROFESSIONAL REFLECTION
Date:______________
Name: Station:
Position/Designation:
Topic/Session
Insights/Key take Away/ Learning
Clarifications/Questions
General Comments/Suggestions:

We 9400
Page 5 of 12
MONITORING & EVALUATION (M&E) TOOL FOR LAC SESSIONS
School: Date:
District: School Head:
AGREEMENTS Check(√) the box below Observation Notes
FOCUS AREA (Based on the Observed Not
Least Developed Competencies Observed
of Teachers on the 12 PPST
indicators of the 7 KRA’s)
Examples
CONTENT/ KNOWLEDGE
AND PEDAGOGY
Content Knowledge
Skills in particular
Instructional strategies
Questioning Techniques
ASSESSMENT
Test Construction Skills
Skills in Assessment
LEARNER DIVERSITY &
STUDENT INCLUSION
Knowledge of learners & how
they learn
Classroom management Skills
CONTEXTUALIZATION,
LOCALIZATION,
INDIGENIZATION
Skills on contextualizing,
localizing, Indigenizing IM’s
21ist CENTURY SKILLS AND

We 9400
Page 6 of 12
ICT INTEGRATION IN
INSTRUCTION AND
ASSESSMENT
Communication Skills
GIVING COMPLIMENTS:
Prepared by:
_________________________________
PSDS/PIC/LAC Coordinator
MONITORING & EVALUATION (M&E) TOOL FOR AGREEMENTS
School: Date:
District: School Head:
AGREEMENTS Check(√) the box below Observation Notes
FOCUS AREA (Based on the Conducted Not
Least Developed Competencies Conducted
of Teachers on the 12 PPST
indicators of the 7 KRA’s)
Examples
CONTENT/ KNOWLEDGE AND
PEDAGOGY
Content Knowledge
Skills in particular Instructional
strategies
Questioning Techniques
Agreement: Inclusion of possible
questions to be asked
particular/daily lesson
Time:
Persons responsible
ASSESSMENT
Test Construction Skills
Skills in Assessment
LEARNER DIVERSITY &
STUDENT INCLUSION
Knowledge of learners & how
they learn
Classroom management Skills
CONTEXTUALIZATION,
LOCALIZATION,

We 9400
Page 7 of 12
INDIGENIZATION
Skills on contextualizing,
localizing, Indigenizing IM’s
21ist CENTURY SKILLS AND
ICT INTEGRATION IN
INSTRUCTION AND
ASSESSMENT
Communication Skills
GIVING COMPLIMENTS:
Prepared by:
_________________________________
PSDS/PIC/LAC Coordinator

We 9400
Page 8 of 12
3rd Quarter CY 2022 School LAC Accomplishment Report

Name of District__________________ Name Of School ______________ Month_________
Topic/Title Number of Trained Teachers Date Focus Area Source of Facilitating Hindering Output
Implemented Fund Factors Factor/s/
Male Female Total
Prepared by: Checked by: Monitored by:
____________________ ________________________ ____________________________

We 9400
Page 9 of 12
School LAC Coordinator School Head PSDS/PIC
3rd Quarter District LAC Consolidated Accomplishment Report

Name of District__________________ Number of Schools in (AOR)_________________Month_________
Name Topic Number of Number of Trained Date Source Facilitating Hindering Output
of Title LAC Teachers Implemented of Factor/s Factor/s
School Activities Fund
Conducted
Male Female Total
1.
Total
Prepared by: Checked by: Noted by: APPROVED:
_________________ ________________________ _______________________ ____________________________

District LAC Coordinator PSDS/PIC Div. LAC Coordinator Schools Division Superintendent

We 9400
Page 10 of 12

We 9400
Page 11 of 12

We 9400
Page 12 of 12

Lac Form

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lac Form

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lac Form

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

LAC SESSION EVALUATION TOOL

Name of Facilitator:____________________________________ Gender________

1 Induction procedures are

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

EVALUATION TOOL FOR LAC

SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS 4 3 2 1 NA

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

EVALUATION TOOL FOR LAC

SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS 4 3 2 1 NA

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

MONITORING & EVALUATION (M&E) TOOL FOR LAC SESSIONS

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

3rd Quarter CY 2022 School LAC Accomplishment Report

Prepared by: Checked by: Monitored by:

____________________ ________________________ ____________________________

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

3rd Quarter District LAC Consolidated Accomplishment Report

Prepared by: Checked by: Noted by: APPROVED:

_________________ ________________________ _______________________ ____________________________

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

Address: Email Address: Cotabato.division@deped.gov.ph

You might also like

Name of Facilitator:____________________________ Gender

________

_____ _ __________________