Patrology
Patrology
Patrology
0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Church doctrine
Often the word doctrine specifically suggests a body of religious principles as promulgated by
the magisterium of the church. Doctrine may also refer to a principle of law, in the common-
law traditions, established through a history of past decisions within the church. Some of the
doctrines that have developed in the church include; the Holy Trinity, soteriology, divinity and
humanity of Christ, Transubstantiation and Mariology.1 Below are the ways through which the
doctrine developed;
Depending on the attacks from the various heretics, Church Fathers Like Irenaeus, in his work
Against all Heresies, he profoundly responds to the Gnostics who allege that Jesus took nothing
from the Virgin; he says they greatly err and he asks why did He then come down into Mary if
He were to take nothing of her? This was a foundation for Christology and elaborating on his
Humanity and divinity. Many more works that defend the church teachings were developed like
De Trinitate by St. Augustine of Hippo, giving clear and distinct explanations about the Holy
Trinity. Hippolytus of Rome, in the Discourse on the End of the world explains about salavation
and the life to come. Hippolytus still states in the Refutation of all heresies, that no one willrefute
heretics except the Holy spirit bequeathed unto the church, which the apostles transmitted to
those who rightly believed; he calls upon the guardians of the church to be vigilant in fighting
these erroneous teachings. Conclusively, according to John Henry Newman, when the Church
Fathers speak of doctrines, they speak of them as being universally held. He says they teach us
1
Tanner, Norman P. (ed.), Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Volume One: Nicaea I to Lateran V,
Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press 1990. p. 35.
1
doctrine because they bare witness to what Christ has taught and passed on through apostolic
tradition. Therefore, we can’t shun the Fact that the church Fathers laid a foundation for the
development of doctrine.
2
Erickson Mj. The word became flesh: A contemporary Incarnational Christology, New York: Baker Book
House, 1966. p. 114.
3
Tanner, Norman P. (ed.), 1990, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Volume One: Nicaea I to Lateran V,
Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press 1990.p.78.
2
leaders during the investiture crisis. It safeguarded the church against the growing heresies,
hence the doctrine flourishing.
3
leadership of the worldwide church. During the 1st century of the church (30-130), the Roman
capital became recognized as a center of exceptional importance. In the 2nd century, there were
more manifestations of Roman authority over other churches. In 189, assertion of the primacy of
the church of Rome may be indicated in Irenaeus’s work Against Heresies: With (church of
Rome), because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree…and it is in her that the
faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition. In 195, Pope Victor 1, in what is
seen as an exercise of Roman authority over other churches, excommunicated the
Quartodeciman for observing Easter on the 14th of Nisan, the date of the Jewish Passover.
Celebration of Easter on a Sunday, as insisted on by the pope, is the system that has prevailed.6
When Constantine became emperor of the western Roman empire in 312, in the Edict of Millan,
which mandated toleration of all religions in the empire. Decisions made at the council of Nicea
325 about the divinity of Christ led to a schism; the new religion, Arianism, flourished outside
the Roman Empire. This led to further schisms. In 380, the Edict of Thessalonica declared
Nicene Christianity, as opposed to Arianism, to be the state religion of the empire, with the name
Catholic Christians reserved for those who accepted that faith. While the civil power in the
Eastern Roman Empire controlled the church and the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople, the
capital wielded much power, in the western Roman empire the bishops of Rome were able to
consolidate the influence and power they already possessed. 7 After the bishop of Rome gaining
supremacy, now it meant definition and defending of the doctrine by the magisterium. Through
encyclicals and declaring dogmas to protect her teachings, this later led to the growth of Church
doctrine.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The doctrine of the church developed as result of attacks or wrong teachings made by the
different heretics. The attempt to respond to them by the Church Fathers enlightened more about
the stand of the church on her beliefs which were more profoundly defended in the ecumenical
councils. The pope had to declare dogmas on every grave theological error that could distort the
teaching of the church in the end, this could protect her doctrine and thus flourish.
6
Grillmeier A. Christ in Christian Tradition: from the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (451),
Louisville, Westminster John Knox press, 1975. p. 210.
7
John A. Haldon (ed), Arianism, Modern Catholic Dictionary. New York Doubleday, 1966. p.41.
4
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Tanner, Norman P. (ed.), 1990, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Volume One: Nicaea I to
Lateran V, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Baker M. T.F, Torrance and Eastern Orthodoxy: Theology in reconciliation, USA: (2015)
Wipfandstock.
Cross FL. Heresy. Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. 2005
Erickson Mj. The word became flesh: A contemporary Incarnational Christology, New York:
. 1966 Baker Book House.
Grillmeier A. Christ in Christian Tradition: from the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (451),
Louisville: 1975, Westminster John Knox press.
Haldon JA. Apollinarianism. In John A Haldon Sj(ed) Modern Catholic Dictionary. New
York: Doubleday, 33.
Haldon JA. Arianism. John A. Haldon (ed), Modern Catholic Dictionary. New York Doubleday,
41. 1966.
Macleod D, The Person of Christ, Nottomgham: SPCK Publishing. (1998)
Mcdonald hd, Development and Christology. Vox Evangelica 9:5-27. 1975
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1
5
1.1 Church doctrine......................................................................................................................1
2.0 ROLE PLAYED BY CHURCH FATHERS.............................................................................1
3.0 ROLE OF ECUMENICAL COUNCILS...................................................................................2
4.0 ACUTENESS OF THEOLOGICAL ERROR...........................................................................3
5.0 ROLE OF THE PAPACY.........................................................................................................3
6.0 CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................4
BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................................5