Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Tuti

    Uploaded by

    Rahmat Untung S
    The document evaluates websites for research purposes using a rubric with criteria in four areas: relevance, author, purpose, and evidence/currency. It scores websites on a scale of 0 to 3 in each area, with 0 being the lowest/worst and 3 being the highest/best. An overall total score is calculated, with scores of 12-15 considered excellent, 9-12 good, 5-8 borderline, and less than 5 unacceptable. The rubric provides guidelines to help determine appropriate scores in each area by considering factors like the website type, details/arguments presented, intended audience, author credentials, stated purpose, citations/references, date of last update, and design/navigation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Tuti

    Uploaded by

    Rahmat Untung S
    30 views3 pages
    The document evaluates websites for research purposes using a rubric with criteria in four areas: relevance, author, purpose, and evidence/currency. It scores websites on a scale of 0 to 3 in each area, with 0 being the lowest/worst and 3 being the highest/best. An overall total score is calculated, with scores of 12-15 considered excellent, 9-12 good, 5-8 borderline, and less than 5 unacceptable. The rubric provides guidelines to help determine appropriate scores in each area by considering factors like the website type, details/arguments presented, intended audience, author credentials, stated purpose, citations/references, date of last update, and design/navigation.

    Original Title

    tuti

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document evaluates websites for research purposes using a rubric with criteria in four areas: relevance, author, purpose, and evidence/currency. It scores websites on a scale of 0 to 3 in each area, with 0 being the lowest/worst and 3 being the highest/best. An overall total score is calculated, with scores of 12-15 considered excellent, 9-12 good, 5-8 borderline, and less than 5 unacceptable. The rubric provides guidelines to help determine appropriate scores in each area by considering factors like the website type, details/arguments presented, intended audience, author credentials, stated purpose, citations/references, date of last update, and design/navigation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    30 views3 pages

    Tuti

    Uploaded by

    Rahmat Untung S
    The document evaluates websites for research purposes using a rubric with criteria in four areas: relevance, author, purpose, and evidence/currency. It scores websites on a scale of 0 to 3 in each area, with 0 being the lowest/worst and 3 being the highest/best. An overall total score is calculated, with scores of 12-15 considered excellent, 9-12 good, 5-8 borderline, and less than 5 unacceptable. The rubric provides guidelines to help determine appropriate scores in each area by considering factors like the website type, details/arguments presented, intended audience, author credentials, stated purpose, citations/references, date of last update, and design/navigation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    https://www.sonora.

    id/read
    /423530695/40-contoh-
    penyimpangan-sosial-
    lengkap-dengan-pengertian-
    jenis-dan-bentuknya-materi-
    sosiologi?page=6

    Evaluating Websites Rubrics

    Points to Consider: 0 1 2 3 Score


    • What type of website is it? (e.g. webpage, blog, No relevant Minimal Some Right
    wikis, social media) evidence; relevant relevant amount of
    • Are unique details or original ideas, evidence, or Inappropriate evidence evidence detail;
    RELEVANCE arguments presented? audience or original
    • Is there enough detail, or too much detail? scope evidence/
    Is the website • Who is the intended audience? (e.g. arguments;
    relevant for my students/professors, or general public) intended
    assignment? • What is the geographical scope? e.g. Canada, for
    Europe or the world appropriate
    2
    • What era or time period is discussed? e.g. current audience
    issue, historical, or future
    • What do you know about the author (e.g. No contact Minimal Author has Recognized
    AUTHOR credentials) info or evidence sufficient expert,
    • Does the author provide contact information? evidence of of credentials strong
    Is the author • Has the author written other publications on the expertise expertise for your credentials;
    trustworthy? topic to make them a subject expert? needs contact info
    • Is the author sponsored or affiliated with a included 2
    company, publisher, or organization?
    • Is there an About link that clearly states the No clear Author’s Author’s Author’s 2
    purpose of the website? statement of purpose is purpose purpose is
    • Is the purpose of the website to inform or to purpose; questiona somewhat clear and
    spread an agenda? many ads ble / likely matches matches
    PURPOSE • Does the website contain ads or pop-ups? Are they visible biased your needs. with your
    trying to make money? research
    Is the purpose of • Does the organization or author indicate there will require- 3

    333
    the information be bias? ments.
    appropriate? • A domain suffix (or URL extension) can provide
    hints about the website’s intention. Is the domain
    suffix personal, commercial (.com), governmental
    (.gov), organizational (.org) , or educational (.edu)?
    • Is the website a content farm?
    Points to Consider: 0 1 2 3 Score
    • Are there any citations or a list of references to Not supported Minimal Fair amount Well- 2
    EVIDENCE other sources? by other citations of supported
    Is the website • Are there links to related sites? sources, lacks or links information by citations,
    supported by • Can the website text be found elsewhere? citations support relevant
    strong evidence? Copy/paste a few sentences into Google. links

    • Does the website show when it was last updated? No date or A bit out Generally Current,
    • Is the information outdated, or is it missing recent outdated; of date for meets your well-written
    CURRENCY events? poorly written your currency
    • Are there multiple spelling or grammar errors? with broken needs; a criteria; 3
    Is the website • Are links working? links few errors minimal
    current and well- • Is the website easy to use and navigate? (e.g., and errors or
    designed? uncluttered) outdated broken links
    • Are the images appropriate for your topic? (e.g., links
    diagrams, charts, photographs)
    11

    TOTAL:

    Scoring
    12-15 Excellent
    19-12 Good
    5-8 Borderline
    Less than 5 Unacceptable

    You might also like