BILL OF RIGHTS

Concept of Bill of Rights

 PBM Employees Organization v. Philippine Blooming Mills, 51 SCRA

189
 Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS, G.R. No. 122156 Feb. 3, 1997
 People vs. Hipol, G.R. No. 140549, July 22, 2003

PRIVATE ACTS AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS

 People v. Marti, G.R. No. 81561, January 18, 1991)

 Yrasegui v. PAL, G.R. No. 168081, October 17, 2008)

 Zulueta v. CA, G.R. No. 107383, February 20, 1996)

 Waterous Drug Corporation vs. NLRC, GR No. 113271, October 16,

1997

Relation to Human Rights

 Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 104768, July 21, 2003

HEIRARCHY OF RIGHTS

 Philippine Blooming Mills Employees Organization v. Philippine

Blooming Mills Co., Inc., G.R. No. L-31195, June 5, 1973

 Adiong v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 103956, March 31, 1992

 Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Workers’ Union, G.R. No. L-25246,

September 12, 1974

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DUE PROCESS

Due process clause

Section 1 Article III 1987 Constitution

Definition
 People v. Cayat, G.R. No. L-45987, May 5, 1939
 Ermita-Malate Hotel & Motel Operators Association v. City of
 Manila, 20 SCRA 849].
 Legaspi v. Cebu City 723 Phil. 90 (2013)
 U.S. vs. Lin Su Fan (10 Phil. 104)
 Aquino, Jr. vs. Military Commission (63 SCRA 546)
 White Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846,
Jan. 20, 2009

Who are protected

 Smith Bell & Co. v. Natividad, 40 Phil. 163
 Villegas v. Hiu Chiong, 86 SCRA 275

Concept of RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, AND PROPERTY

Meaning of Life

 Imbong vs Ochoa G.R. No, 204819 April 8, 2014

 Secretary of Defense v. Manalo, G.R. No. 180906, Oct. 7, 2008

Meaning of Liberty

 Rubi v. Provincial Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil 660

Meaning of Property

 Nunez v. Averia, 57 SCRA 726

 Bince v. Commission on Electiions, 218 SCRA 782

 Crespo v. Provincial Board, 160 SCRA 66

 MM Promotion and Management v. Court of Appeals
 Republic v. Rosemoor Mining & Development Corporation, G.R.
No.149927, March 30, 2004
 Pedro v. Provincial Board of Rizal, 53 Phil 123
 Chavez v. Romulo, 431 SCRA 534
  ACOSTA VS. OCHOA G.R. No. 211559, October 15, 2019
 Dadulo v. Court of Appeals, 560 Phil. 702, 707-708 (2007).
 Libanan v. Sandiganbayan, 233 SCRA 163
 BAGONG REPORMANG SAMAHAN NG MGA TSUPER AT
OPERATOR SA ROTANG PASIG QUIAPO VIA PALENGKE SAN
JOAQUIN IKOT, INC., REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
CORNELIO R. SADSAD, JR., PETITIONER, VS. CITY OF
MANDALUYONG G.R. No. 218593, June 15, 2020

Purpose
 City of Manila vs. Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, April 12, 2005

Kinds of Due process

1. Substantive
2. Procedural
 White Light Corporation v. City of Manila. 596 Phil. 444 (2009)
 Associated Communications & Wireless Services, Ltd. v. Dumlao:
440 Phil. 787 (2002)

Substantive due process

 Rama v. Moises, G.R. 197146, (2016)

Requisites
 Kwong Sing v. City of Manila, 41 Phil 103
 Layno v. Sandiganbayan, 136 SCRA 536; Deloso v. Sandiganbayan,
173 SCRA 409
 GS/S v.Montesclaros, 434 SCRA41
 COUNCIL OF TEACHERS AND STAFF OF COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES OF THE PHILIPPINES (COTESCUP), ET AL.
VERSUS SECRETARY OF EDUCATION G.R. No. 216930, March
05, 2019

Publication as part of due process

 Tañada vs. Tuvera, G.R. No. L-63915, December 29, 1986
 Republic v. Pilipinas Shell, G.R. No. 173918, April 8, 2008
 The Board of Trustees of the GSIS v. Velasco, G.R. No. 170463,
Feb. 2, 2011
 Villafuerte Vs. Cordia G.R. No. 222450. July 7, 2020
Procedural due process
 White Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, Jan. 20,
2009
 Vivo v. PAGCOR 721 Phil. 34 (2013)

Requisites
 Javier v. Comelec, 144 SCRA 194
 Galman v. Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43
 Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan, 268 SCRA 332, reiterated in
 Imelda Romualdez Marcos v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 126995,
October 6, 1998
 Rivera v. Civil Service Commission, 240 SCRA 43
 Singson v. National Labor Relations Commission, 274 SCRA 358
 GSIS v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 128523, September 26, 1998
 People v. Herida, G.R. No. 127158, March 5, 2001,
 People v. Adora, 275 SCRA 441
 People v. Castillo, 289 SCRA 213,
 People v. Larranaga, 421 SCRA 530
 Cruz v. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No. 144464, November 22,
2001
 Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R.No. 159190, June 30, 2005,
 Sarmiento v. Raon, G.R. No. 131482, July 3, 2002
 De los Santos v. NLRC, G.R. No. 121327, December 20, 2001
 Bautista v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 157219 May 28, 2004
 Eastern Broadcasting v. Dans, 137 SCRA 628
 Gonzales v. Civil Service Commission, 226 SCRA66,
 Lim v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 111397, August 12, 2002,
 Unicraft Industries v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 134309,March 26,
2001
 Caras v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.129900, October 2, 2001
 Demaala vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 173523, February 19, 2014
 Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 212140, January 21,
2015
 Ortigas vs. Lufthansa German Airlines, G.R. No. L-28773, June 30,
1975.
 Emin vs. De Leon, G.R. No. 139794, February 27, 2002.
  Marohombsar vs. Adiong, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1674, January 22, 2004,
 SECTION 14, ARTICLE VIII OF THE CONSTITUTION
 Yao vs. CA, G.R. No. 132428, October 24, 2000
 Shimizu Philippines Contractors, Inc. vs. Magsalin, G.R. No. 170026,
June 20,
2012
 Velarde vs. Social Justice Society, G.R. No. 159357, April 28, 2004

Relativity of due process

 Rubi v. Provincial Board 39 Phil 660

Due process in Judicial proceedings

 Garcia v. Molina and Velasco, G.R. Nos. 157383 and 174137,
August 10, 2010
 Apo Cement vs. Mingson Mining, GR No. 206728, November 12,
2014
 Banco Filipino vs. Palanca (37 Phil. 921),

Criminal Proceedings (To be discussed under topic heading: Rights

of the Accused)

Administrative Due process

 Ebdane vs. Apurillo , G.R. No. 204172, December 09, 2015
 Ang Tibay v. CIR, 69 Phil 635
 Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Avon Products Manufacturing,
Inc., G.R. Nos. 201398-99 and 201418-19, October 3, 2018
 Autencio v. Mahara, 489 Phil. 752-761 (2005)
 VELASQUEZ VS. HERNANDEZ, G.R. NO. 150732 AUGUST 31,
2004
 ERECE VS. MACALINGAY G.R. NO. 166809, APRIL 22, 2009
 ALATRACA VS NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION
G.R. No. 238312, September 03, 2020
 GELITO V. HEIRS OF CIRIACO TIROL G.R. No. 196367, February
05, 2020

Due process in academic and disciplinary proceedings

  Vivares and Suzara v. St. Theresa’s College, G.R. No. 202666,
September 29, 2014

 Cudia v. Superintendent of the PMA, G.R. No. 211362, February 24,

2015
 Non v. Dames, G.R. No. 89317 (1990)]
 ADMU v. Capulong, G.R. No. 99327, May 27, 1993

Due process in deportation proceedings

 Lao Gi v. CA, GR. No. 81789, December 29, 1989

 Domingo v. Scheer, G.R. No. 154745, January 29, 2004

STANDARDS OF DUE PROCESS IN ALL CASES OF TERMINATION OF

EMPLOYMENT

Constitutional vs. Statutory Due Process

 Agabon v. NLRC 485 Phil. 248 (2004) 
 Mariveles Shipyard v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 144134,
 November 11, 2003; Zacarias v. National Police Commission, G.R.
No. 119847, October 24, 2003

 Valladolid v. Inciong, 121 SCRA 205]

 Fernandez v. NLRC, G.R. No. 105892, January 28, 1998

 Vinta Maritime v.NLRC, G.R. No. 113911, January 23, 1998].

 Torres v. Gonzales, 152 SCRA 272

 Zaldivar v. Sandiganbayan, 166 SCRA 316

 Puerto Commercial v. Lopez 639 Phil. 437 (2010). 

 Puncia v. Toyota Shaw/Pasig, Inc., 788 Phil. 464, 478 (2016).

 Del Rosario v. CW Marketing & Development Corp., G.R. No.

211105, February 20, 2019
  Serrano vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 117040, January 27, 2000

Instances when hearings are not necessary

Extradition Proceedings

 Secretary of Justice v. Judge Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, October 17,

2000;

 Cuevas v. Munoz, G.R. No. 140520, December 18, 2000]

 Government of HongKong v. Hon. Felixberto Olalia, jr., G.R. No.

153675, April 19, 2007

Effect when due process is not observed

 Garcia vs. Molina G.R, No, 157383 August 10, 2010

Effect of waiver or estoppel

Appeal and due process

 Tropical Homes, Inc. v. NHA, 152 SCRA 540

 Alba v. Nitorreda, 254 SCRA 753

 Producers Bank v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126620, April 17, 2002
 Barata v. Abalos, G.R. No. 142888, June 6, 2001

 Sajot v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 109721, March 11, 1999

 Moslares vs. CA, G.R. No. 129744, June 26, 1998

Judicial standards of review

Levels of Scrutiny

 White Light Corporation v. City of Manila 440 Phil. 787 (2002)

 Separate opinion of Justice Mendoza Estrada v. Sandiganbayan,

G.R. No. 148965, February 26, 2002
  MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC., PETITIONER, VS. THE
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES ("DENR") SEPARATE CONCURRING
OPINION LEONEN, J.: G.R. No. 202897, August 06, 2019 ]
 Spark v. Quezon City, G.R. No. 225442, August 8, 2017, 835 SCRA
350

VOID-FOR-VAGUENESS DOCTRINE

 People v. de la Piedra, G.R. No. 128777, January 24, 2001

 Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001

 SPARK, Et. al. vs. Quezon City, GR No. 225442, August 08, 2017

 People v. dela Piedra G.R. No. 128777 January 24, 2001

 People vs. Nazario, 165 SCRA 186 [1988])
 CALLEJA VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY G.R. No. 252578. December 07, 2021

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Equal protection

Section 1 Article III 1987 Constitution

Concept

 YRASUEGUI vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC G.R. No. 168081       

October 17, 2008

 Biraogo v. Philippine Truth Commission of 2010, G.R. No. 192935,

December 7, 2010

 Ichong v. Hernandez, G.R. No. L-7995, May 31, 1957)

 City of Manila vs. Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, April 12, 2005.

 Social Justice Society vs. Atienza, G.R. No. 156502, February 13,
2008.
REQUISITES FOR VALID CLASSIFICATION

 People v. Cayat, GR. No. L-45987, May 5, 1939)

 Garcia v. Drilon, G.R. No. 179267, June 25, 2013

 Imbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014)

 Central Bank Employees Association, Inc., v. BangkoSentral ng

Pilipinas, G.R. No. 148208, December 15, 2004

 Tolentino vs. Board of Accountancy, 90 Phil. 83, 90

 Himagan vs. People of the Philippines and Judge Hilario Mapayao

(G.R. No. 113811, 56 SCAD 156, October 7, 1994

 City of Manila vs. Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, April 12, 2005

 LIM VS. PACQUING 58 SCAD 880, 240 SCRA 649

 Ormoc Sugar Co., Inc. vs. Treasurer of Ormoc City, 22 SCRA 603
 Almonte vs. Vasquez, G.R. No. 95367, May 23, 1995, 61 SCAD 274)
 Pasei vs. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386)
 (The Conference of Maritime Manning Agencies, Inc. vs. POEA, 60
SCAD 674, 243 SCRA 666)
 DUNCAN ASSOCIATION OF DETAILMAN-PTGWO, ET AL. VS.
GLAXO WELLCOME PHILIPPINES, INC. G.R. NO. 162994,
SEPTEMBER 17, 2004
 Telecommunications and Broadcast Attorneys of the Philippines, Inc.
vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 132922, April 21, 1998
 Mirasol vs. DPWH, G.R. No. 158793, June 8, 2006
 International School Alliance of Educators vs. Quisumbing, G.R. No.
128845, June 1, 2000,
 People vs. Jalosjos, G.R. No. 132875, February 3, 2000,
 DECS vs. San Diego, G.R. No. 89572, December 21, 1989
 Quinto vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189698, February 22, 2010
 Imbong vs. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014
 Biraogo vs. The Philippine Truth Commission of 2010, G.R. No.
192935, December 7, 2010,
  Arroyo vs. Department of Justice, G.R. No. 199082, September 18,
2012

Levels of Scrutiny
 Concurring Opinion of Justice Leonardo-De Castro in Garcia v.
Drilon, G.R. No. 179267, June 25, 2013
 White Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, January
20, 2009
 Central Bank Employees Association Inc. v. BSP, GR. No. 148208,
December 15, 2004)
 Concurring Opinion of Justice Leonardo-De Castro in Garcia v.
Drilon, G.R. No. 179267, June 25, 2013