FA2
FA2
FA2
The IASB’s Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting describes the basic concepts by which
financial statements are prepared. The main purpose of the Framework is to:
1. assist in the development of future IFRS and the review of existing standards by setting out the
underlying concepts
3. assist the preparers of financial statements in the application of IFRS, which would include
dealing with accounting transactions for which there is not (yet) an accounting standard.
For decisions to be made, the information must be relevant to the decision and be clearly presented,
stating any assumptions upon which the information is based, so that the user may exercise
judgement as appropriate.
The revised Framework distinguishes between two types of qualitative characteristics that are
necessary to provide useful financial information:
1. Relevance
Relevant financial information is capable of making a difference in the decisions made by users
That is not to say the financial statements should be predictive in the sense of forecasts, but that
(past) information should be presented in a manner that assists users to assess an entity’s ability to
take advantage of opportunities and react to adverse situations.
o Materiality
Materiality is a threshold or cut-off point for information whose omission or misstatement could
influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
This depends on the size of the item or error judged in the particular circumstances of its omission or
misstatement.
Hence, materiality is not a matter to be considered by standard-setters but by preparers and their
auditors.
2. Faithful Representation
General purpose financial reports represent economic phenomena in words and numbers.
To be useful, financial information must not only be relevant, it must also represent faithfully the
phenomena it purports to represent.
Financial information that faithfully represents economic phenomena has three characteristics: -
it is complete
it is neutral
it is free from error
Comparability, verifiability, timeliness and understandability are directed to enhance both relevant
and faithfully represented financial information.
1. Comparability
Assessing the performance of an entity over time (trend analysis) requires that the financial
statements used have been prepared on a comparable (consistent) basis.
Users can confirm that comparative information for calculating trends is comparable.
The disclosure of accounting policies at least informs users if different entities use different policies.
Comparability should be distinguished from consistency (the consistent use of accounting methods).
It is recognised that there are situations where it is necessary to adopt new accounting policies
(usually through new Standards) if they enhance relevance and reliability. Consistency and
comparability require the existence and disclosure of accounting policies.
2. Verifiability
3. Timeliness
4. Understandability
o classified
o characterised
However, relevant information should not be excluded solely because it may be too complex and
cannot be made easy to understand.
To exclude such information would make financial reports incomplete and potentially misleading.
Financial reports are prepared for users who have a reasonable knowledge of business and
economic activities and who review and analyse the information with diligence.
Cost is a pervasive constraint to financial reporting. Reporting such information imposes costs and
those costs should be justified by the benefits of reporting that information.
The IASB assesses costs and benefits in relation to financial reporting generally, and not solely in
relation to individual reporting entities.
The IASB will consider whether different sizes of entities and other factors justify different reporting
requirements in certain situations.
Underlying Assumptions
The Framework sets out two concepts which can be presumed when reading financial statements:
Accrual Basis
The effects of transactions and other events are recognised when they occur, rather than when cash
or its equivalent is received or paid, and they are reported in the financial statements of the periods
to which they relate.
Going Concern
The financial statements presume that an enterprise will continue in operation in the foreseeable
future or, if that presumption is not valid, disclosure and a different basis of reporting are required.
Other Accounting Concepts
Transactions need to be accounted for and presented in accordance with their substance and
economic reality even if their legal form is different.
Fair presentation
The financial statements must "present fairly" the financial position, financial performance and cash
flows of an entity.
Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events,
and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities,
income and expenses set out in the Framework.
In some rare circumstances, management may decide that compliance with a requirement of an IFRS
would be misleading. Departure from the IFRS is therefore required to achieve a fair presentation.
Consistency
The same accounting principles should be used to prepare financial statements over a number of
periods
Underlying Assumptions
The Framework sets out two concepts which can be presumed when reading financial statements:
Accrual Basis
The effects of transactions and other events are recognised when they occur, rather than when cash
or its equivalent is received or paid, and they are reported in the financial statements of the periods
to which they relate.
Going Concern
The financial statements presume that an enterprise will continue in operation in the foreseeable
future or, if that presumption is not valid, disclosure and a different basis of reporting are required.
Transactions need to be accounted for and presented in accordance with their substance and
economic reality even if their legal form is different.
Fair presentation
The financial statements must "present fairly" the financial position, financial performance and cash
flows of an entity.
Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events,
and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities,
income and expenses set out in the Framework.
In some rare circumstances, management may decide that compliance with a requirement of an IFRS
would be misleading. Departure from the IFRS is therefore required to achieve a fair presentation.
Consistency
The same accounting principles should be used to prepare financial statements over a number of
periods
Historical Cost
Historical cost has been defined as the amount paid or fair value of the consideration given.
The cost is known and can be proved (e.g. against an invoice). It is therefore objective
It enhances comparability
It leads to stable pricing – using current market values would lead to volatility in asset values
Since non-current asset values are low, depreciation is low and does not fully reflect the
value of the asset consumed during the accounting year
There is a possibility that this may lead to higher taxation, wage demands and dividend expectation
(based on overstated earnings per share).
The combination of these effects is that a company may overspend or over distribute its profits and
not maintain its capital base.
Comparisons over time are unrealistic
Understatement of asset values tends to overstate gearing, and leads to a low asset per
share value and can make the company vulnerable to a take over
Where assets, particularly land and buildings, are being used as security to raise finance, it is
current value that lenders are interested in, not historical values
These disadvantages usually arise in times of rising prices. In fact, in times of rising prices, historical
cost accounting tends to understate asset values and overstate profits.
Prudence