Sex Selection
Sex Selection
Sex Selection
ETHICAL ASPECTS
1. Ethical issues are always considered in sex selection. In fact selecting the gender of a child
before birth is controversial, because as it is pointed out in human rights, racial preference is
strongly prohibited, so can be gender preference considered an approved decision, as it is in
favor of a gender over another, while diminishing the opposite sex's value in society.
2. Sex selection is often discussed seriously and always a question arises that whether use of
modern technologies in fertility for selecting the gender of future child is ethical or not? Those
who believe in this issue, usually consider this issue as disobedience of God. and therefore
interfering in natural process of reproduction.
3. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for gender selection for non-medical reasons has been
considered an unethical procedure by several authors and agencies in the Western society on
the basis that it could disrupt the sex ratio, that it discriminates against women and that it leads
to disposal of normal embryos of the non-desired gender
- One of the concerns of elective sex selection is sex discrimination that results in an
imbalance in the sex ratio within a given society. This already exists in China and India,
where male children are particularly favored [10, 11], but is less likely to happen in the
Western world [12, 13], where “family balancing” is the usual reason for nonmedical sex
selection [3]. Because of unavailability of sex selection in a majority of countries around the
world, patients from China and India undertake “sex-selection traveling” to the clinics that
provide such services in the U.S. The risk of population sex imbalance in the U.S. is not great,
largely due to its ethnically mixed population, in which different preferences in sex selection
balance each other. Asian and Middle Eastern couples often prefer sons, while Caucasian
and Hispanic couples prefer daughters [14]. Nonetheless, nonmedical sex selection risks
indulging or reinforcing sex discrimination and may even contribute to sex-based
stereotyping [8].
- Another argument against sex selection for nonmedical reasons is exposure to unnecessary
medical risks. As mentioned above, IVF carries certain risks, such as ovarian
hyperstimulation syndrome. The risks associated with sperm sorting are still unclear due to
the lack of relevant research, though some studies have found that Hoechst dye can have a
mutagenic effect on sperm [15]. These findings suggest caution when using sperm sorting as
an elective procedure [15], as does the unknown risk associated with repeatedly freezing
and thawing sperm. Further studies are warranted before recommending sperm sorting.
- Due to patient demand and financial pressures, reproductive endocrinology and infertility
physicians may consider providing ethically controversial services. However, it is important
to know that practitioners who offer assisted reproductive services are under no legal or
ethical obligations to provide nonmedically indicated preconception methods of sex
selection [8]. Applying this to the current scenario, Dr. Jones should not feel any legal or
ethical obligations to provide reproductive services to the Carters, if doing so conflicts with
his own clinical judgment, values, or beliefs.