Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

JEEPNEY PHASEOUT

TOPIC OUTLINE

SUBMITTED By:
Aaron Darrel B. Francisco
10 - Belardo
Do jeepneys really need to be
modernized?
"Culture does not change because we desire to change it. Culture changes
when the organization is transformed; the culture reflects the realities of people
working together every day." - Frances Hesselbein. Jeepneys have become
synonymous with everyday life in the Philippines. The first was cobbled together
using parts of leftover Jeeps left behind by American forces during World War II,
which the Filipinos turned into transport vehicles that could hold between 15 and 20
people, but what if I told you such colorful cars are hazardous to our environment?
Do you agree that they should be modernized? Then let us discuss "Jeepney
Phaseout."

Let us first discuss what is a jeepney phaseout? It is a multi-phased program


that begins with phasing out old vehicles that are no longer roadworthy or emissions
compliant, then moves on to scrutinizing and reorganizing routes, franchises, and
roles of the vehicles involved, and finally, introducing new systems and standards for
vehicles that will serve the public.

The Jeepney Phase-out is a significant change in the way PUV franchises are
granted and routes are organized. The Jeepney Phaseout is only one component of
a larger plan known as PUV Modernization. The government has even prepared a
financing package called 5-6-7-8: a 5% down-payment, a 6% interest rate, a 7-year
repayment period, and a P80,000 subsidy per unit.

Approximately 65% of jeepneys and 75% of UV Express units have already


been consolidated, according to government data. According to the LTFRB, 90% of
transportation organizations support the program. Furthermore, according to a 2019
study, most commuters prefer to ride e-jeepneys over conventional ones when they
are available. Some transportation groups, on the other hand, believe that the
phase-out of jeepneys is anti-poor because it places the burden of purchasing new
vehicles on drivers and operators. They can cost up to $50,000, which is more than
ten times the price of traditional jeepneys. Another point of contention is that modern
jeepneys are manufactured in other countries rather than in the Philippines.
During the launch of the program assistance to transport corporations and
cooperatives, Transportation Secretary Arthur Tugade, however, said the reform in
road-based public transportation is "not-anti poor." Tugade said the program "is not
designed to phase out jeepneys or the jeepney business. It is actually intended to
fortify [and] ensure the profitability of this jeep.

The JMP has had an impact on both the transportation industry and society,
both positively and negatively. On the plus side, the program aims to improve public
transportation quality by replacing old and outdated jeepneys with newer, safer, and
more efficient models.

The new vehicles have modern features like air conditioning, GPS tracking,
and automated fare collection, making commuting easier for passengers.
Furthermore, because the new vehicles are designed to meet the government's
emission standards, they are expected to reduce air pollution.

The program has been met with opposition from jeepney drivers and
operators, who claim that it will result in job losses and the displacement of many
small operators. They argue that instead of replacing traditional jeepneys, the
government should provide assistance in upgrading them. Even with subsidies, the
cost of a modernized jeepney remains out of reach for the majority of drivers and
operators. The loan would consume the majority of their income, leaving little for
them to live on.

Notwithstanding the obstacles provided by the Jeepney Modernization


Program, it also presents significant opportunities for the transportation industry and
society. The program could contribute to the establishment of a more sustainable
and efficient transportation system. It will also reduce pollution and increase
commuter safety. Furthermore, the program may provide opportunities for new
businesses and industries. More jobs will be created as a result of the new jeepneys'
manufacturing and maintenance.
Others want jeepneys to be phased out. I disagree with that viewpoint
because those individuals did not consider the welfare of others. What if other
people are unable to purchase their own vehicle or car? How will they get to their
destination? Such as important occasions, jobs, or even schools. Also, jeepney
drivers have families, which is why they work as jeepney drivers; how will they
provide for their families' needs and provide money for food if they lose their jobs as
jeepney drivers? So my petition states that I oppose jeepney phaseout, because
they are a part of our culture. Let us assist our valiant jeepney drivers. NO TO
JEEPNEY PHASEOUT!

TOPIC OUTLINE
HOOK
"Culture does not change because we desire to change it. Culture changes when the
organization is transformed; the culture reflects the realities of people working together
every day." - Frances Hesselbein.

THESIS STATEMENT
Jeepney drivers claim that jeepney modernization and jeepney phaseout affect them very
much and provide no support for them. It will lead to them having no jobs and a lack of
money for everyday life.

INTRODUCTION
Jeepneys have become synonymous with everyday life in the Philippines. The first was
cobbled together using parts of leftover Jeeps left behind by American forces during World
War II, which the Filipinos turned into transport vehicles that could hold between 15 and
20 people, but what if I told you such colorful cars are hazardous to our environment? Do
you agree that they should be modernized? Then let us discuss "Jeepney Phaseout."
BODY #1
Let us first discuss what is a jeepney phaseout? It is a multi-phased program that begins with
phasing out old vehicles that are no longer roadworthy or emissions compliant, then moves on to
scrutinizing and reorganizing routes, franchises, and roles of the vehicles involved, and finally,
introducing new systems and standards for vehicles that will serve the public.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
This paragraph claims that jeepney
phaseout/modernization will introduce new, The jeepney drivers will not have a job - no
modern, and standard systems for vehicles to money for everyday expenses.
be served at the public.

BODY #2
The Jeepney Phase-out is a significant change in the way PUV franchises are granted and routes
are organized. The Jeepney Phaseout is only one component of a larger plan known as PUV
Modernization. The government has even prepared a financing package called 5-6-7-8: a 5%
down-payment, a 6% interest rate, a 7-year repayment period, and a P80,000 subsidy per unit.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
This paragraph claims that the government The money that has been used could've been
prepared the cost for the modernization of the used for programs that will actually help the
jeepneys. people.
BODY #3
Approximately 65% of jeepneys and 75% of UV Express units have already been consolidated,
according to government data. According to the LTFRB, 90% of transportation organizations
support the program. Furthermore, according to a 2019 study, most commuters prefer to ride e-
jeepneys over conventional ones when they are available. Some transportation groups, on the
other hand, believe that the phase-out of jeepneys is anti-poor because it places the burden of
purchasing new vehicles on drivers and operators. They can cost up to $50,000, which is more
than ten times the price of traditional jeepneys. Another point of contention is that modern
jeepneys are manufactured in other countries rather than in the Philippines.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
This paragraph claims that most commuters
prefer modernized jeeps such as E-jeep What if there hadn't been an E-jeep available
(Because they feel safe, and comfortable) at the time? They will then have no choice
over the traditional one, based on a study but to go with the traditional one.
from 2019.

BODY #4
During the launch of the program assistance to transport corporations and cooperatives,
Transportation Secretary Arthur Tugade, however, said the reform in road-based public
transportation is "not-anti poor." Tugade said the program "is not designed to phase out jeepneys
or the jeepney business. It is actually intended to fortify [and] ensure the profitability of this jeep.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
With jeepney drivers' daily earnings
This paragraph claims that the JMP is intended
averaging only a few hundred pesos, the
to fortify and ensure the profitability of the
modern jeepney is out of their financial
jeepneys.
reach.
BODY #5
The JMP has had an impact on both the transportation industry and society, both positively and
negatively. On the plus side, the program aims to improve public transportation quality by
replacing old and outdated jeepneys with newer, safer, and more efficient models.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
This paragraph says that JMP aims to improve By replacing the current jeepneys, there will
public transportation by replacing the current be no left jeepneys in that current time, and
jeepneys. the commuters will have no transportation to
use.

BODY #6
The new vehicles have modern features like air conditioning, GPS tracking, and automated fare
collection, making commuting easier for passengers. Furthermore, because the new vehicles are
designed to meet the government's emission standards, they are expected to reduce air pollution.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
This paragraphs claims that modernized jeep It will now cost more because the jeeps have
will be safe for the commuters since it has air been modernized with air conditioning, GPS,
conditioning, GPS, automated fare collection. and automated fare collection.
BODY #7
The program has been met with opposition from jeepney drivers and operators, who claim that it
will result in job losses and the displacement of many small operators. They argue that instead of
replacing traditional jeepneys, the government should provide assistance in upgrading them.
Even with subsidies, the cost of a modernized jeepney remains out of reach for the majority of
drivers and operators. The loan would consume the majority of their income, leaving little for them
to live on.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
This paragraph claims that the government When upgrading jeepneys, it will also cost
should provide assistance for the upgrade of them much money, when they can make a
the jeepneys. program instead that will help the people
more.

BODY #8
Notwithstanding the obstacles provided by the Jeepney Modernization Program, it also presents
significant opportunities for the transportation industry and society. The program could contribute
to the establishment of a more sustainable and efficient transportation system. It will also reduce
pollution and increase commuter safety. Furthermore, the program may provide opportunities for
new businesses and industries. More jobs will be created as a result of the new jeepneys'
manufacturing and maintenance.

EVIDENCE COUNTERCLAIM
While it is true that removing old jeepneys from
This paragraph states that the JMP will reduce
our roads would reduce carbon emissions and
pollution and increase commuter safety.
greenhouse gases, the impact would be
minimal at best.
CCONCLUSION
Others want jeepneys to be phased out. I disagree with that viewpoint because those
individuals did not consider the welfare of others. What if other people are unable to
purchase their own vehicle or car? How will they get to their destination? Such as
important occasions, jobs, or even schools. Also, jeepney drivers have families, which is
why they work as jeepney drivers; how will they provide for their families' needs and
provide money for food if they lose their jobs as jeepney drivers? So my petition states
that I oppose jeepney phaseout, because they are a part of our culture. Let us assist our
valiant jeepney drivers. NO TO JEEPNEY PHASEOUT!

LINE OF REASONING
Jeepney modernization will, over time, phase out the jeepney (Could be days, weeks,
months, or year). The jeepney drivers require their jeeps in order to have a job and to
have money to spend in their daily lives. As a result of jeepney modernization, drivers will
lose their jobs and have no money for their daily expenses.

REFERENCE(S)
https://mb.com.ph/2023/3/10/the-jeepney-phase-out-explained
https://greennetwork.asia/news/is-jeepney-phase-out-a-just-transition-to-sustainable-
transport-system/
https://www.change.org/p/president-rodrigo-duterte-no-to-jeepney-phaseout-and-
public-utility-vehicle-modernization-program

You might also like