Improved Respiratory Muscle Endurance of Highly Trained Cyclists and The Effects On Maximal Exercise Performance
Improved Respiratory Muscle Endurance of Highly Trained Cyclists and The Effects On Maximal Exercise Performance
Improved Respiratory Muscle Endurance of Highly Trained Cyclists and The Effects On Maximal Exercise Performance
Indroduction
Abstract
Exercise scientists generally have not thought
M S. Fairbarn, K. C. Coutts, R. L. Pardy, D. that the ventilatory system was a limiting factor to peak athletic
C. McKenzie, Improved Respiratory Muscle Endurance of performance. However, respiratory muscle fatigue has been
Highly Trained Cyclists and the Effects on Maximal Exer- demonstrated following both voluntary hyperpnea (1) and
Pulmonary function tests were performed to To determine the effects of the respiratory
ensure normal spirometry of the subjects. Forced vital capac- muscle endurance training, the mean group pre- and post-
ity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEVi), training differences were tested by multiple analysis of vari-
and maximal voluntary ventilation in 12 seconds (M\TV12) ance for the variables in the following groups:
were measured and analyzed using the Medical Graphics 1. Pulmonary functions: FVC, FEY1, MYV
computerized spirometer system (St. Paul, MN) with the as- 2. Maximal aerobic capacity test: VO2max, VEmax
sociated 1070 software package. 3. Endurance cycle test: turn, VEtlim.
Respiratory Muscle Endurance Training Analysis of variance was used to determine the
Protocol significance of the difference in the MSVC test between the
groups. The data analysis was performed using the statistical
To improve the endurance performance of the package, SYSTAT, version 4 (16). The level of significance for
respiratory muscles, a volume overload technique, isocapnic each test was P <0.05. Data are expressed as mean SD.
hyperpnea, was selected. The subjects attended three or four
training sessions per week for a total of 16 sessions. Each ses- Results
sion consisted of three 8-minute work intervals of isocapnic
hyperpnea alternated with 8-minute intervals of rest. The All 10 cyclists completed the study and main-
training overload was a combination of increasing both venti- tained the same average number of kilometers cycled per week
lation and duration of the work intervals. Initially, the target (range 125—500) throughout the study. Prior to the isocapnic
ventilation for each work interval was the ventilation each sub- hyperpnea training period, there were no differences between
ject achieved during the initail MSVC test with the remainder the training and control groups for any of the variables studied
of each training session at the maximum tolerable ventilation. (Tables 1 & 2).
Progressively, the subjects were able to maintain this target
ventilation for each of the three work intervals. To provide a Following 16 training sessions, the experimen-
training stimulus, the target ventilation was then increased to a tal group demonstrated a significant increase in respiratory
level that could only be maintained for the first work interval muscle endurance. The ventilation during the MSVC test in-
of a training session and the subject's new goal was to maintain creased from 155.4± 11.2 to 173.9± 11.6 1/mm, p=0.OO4.
this larger ventilation for all three work intervals. Following The control groups values were not different (155.1 and
ImprovedRespiratory Muscle Endurance of Highly Trained Cyclists and the Effects mt. J. Sports Med. 12(1991) 69
Fig. 3 Ventilation for each of the three tests: MSVC (maximal sus-
tainable ventilatory capacity test), VEmax (maximal incremental
respiratory muscle training. It has previously been established RR 54 7 breaths/mm). At the end of the training sessions
that athletes involved in sports requiring a high degree of aero- we found that the breathing pattern during the MSVC
bic fitness have greater respiratory muscle endurance than (VT = 3.4 0.21, RR = 53 3 breaths/mm) had become al-
non-athletes (11), but the present study illustrates that the res- most identical to that found at VEmax in the incremental exer-
piratory muscle endurance of highly trained athletes may still cise test. We therefore speculate that it is unlikely that the dif-
be influenced by training programs designed specifically for ferences in breathing pattern during the training compared to
these muscles. the exercise tests would explain the fact that maximum ventila-
tion did not change after training in either the incremental or
The 12% increase in MSVC in this study is not endurance cycle tests. Our study would support the notion that
as large an increase as demonstrated by other studies (2, 6, 8, ventilatory factors do not contribute to exercise limitation in
12). Some of this difference can be explained by the higher in- highly trained athletes.
itial MSVC of our athletic subjects. Leith and Bradley (8) re-
ported an increase of 21 %, but the endurance breathing test The VO2max of our subjects did not change
(SVC) they used was a composite of 8 to 10 points of different following hyperpnea training, and these results are consistent
levels of ventilation against time and therefore not strictly with the studies of Morgan et al (12) and Belman and Gaesser
comparable to the MSVC used in this study. The greater im- (2). To increase the VO2max, it would be necessary to increase
provement reported in the study by Keens et al (6) was possibly the amount of oxygen available to the working muscles, and
because their subjects (age 28.3 2.6 yr) had 30 training this can be accomplished by increasing the cardiac output
sessions compared to 16 for the subjects in this study. The and/or the systemic arteriovenous oxygen difference. The
70 mt. J. Sports Med. 12 (1991) M. S. Fairbarn, K. C. Coutts, R. L. Pardy, D. C. McKenzie