Features of Ryotwari System: Land Ownership and Occupancy Rights Were Transferred To The Ryot, and There
Features of Ryotwari System: Land Ownership and Occupancy Rights Were Transferred To The Ryot, and There
Features of Ryotwari System: Land Ownership and Occupancy Rights Were Transferred To The Ryot, and There
Drawbacks
Drawbacks of Ryotwari System
Overestimation of revenue was a major issue. The fixed land revenue was
frequently greater than the land's capacity.
The collection method was rigid, frequently involving torture to extract tax.
Corruption grew as officers were able to be bribed while assessing the land.
Non-cultivating landlords could be registered as the owners of specific holdings,
with the actual cultivator reduced to being their tenants, servants, or even
bonded labourers.
The high tax and harassment in collection devalued land value because few
people wanted to buy it.
Issue
Issue with Ryotwari System
This system delegated a great deal of authority to subordinate revenue officials,
whose activities were not adequately monitored.
The mahajans and moneylenders who granted loans to cultivators by mortgaging
their land dominated the system.
In the event of a loan default, the moneylenders exploited the cultivators and
evicted them from their land.
Conclusion
Conclusion
The burden of land revenue was somewhat reduced under the reformed ryotwari
system. The purchaser could now expect to profit from owning land because the state
would not take all of it as tax. As a result, moneylenders began seizing the lands of their
peasant debtors and either evicting them or reducing them to tenants. The zamindars
were removed by the system. The ryots paid the government roughly half the crop's
value.