Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Azarcon Interpretation

    Uploaded by

    ROGEN KATE AZARCON
    This document discusses the results of a study analyzing the reliability of questions assessing care during labor and care during delivery. [1] It finds that the questions regarding care during labor have acceptable reliability, while the questions regarding care during delivery have unacceptable reliability. [2] It determines that no questions need to be deleted for care during labor, but that all questions should be deleted for care during delivery based on their poor reliability. [3] The response supports these conclusions with literature on interpreting Cronbach's alpha and the acceptable ranges for reliability.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Azarcon Interpretation

    Uploaded by

    ROGEN KATE AZARCON
    12 views2 pages
    This document discusses the results of a study analyzing the reliability of questions assessing care during labor and care during delivery. [1] It finds that the questions regarding care during labor have acceptable reliability, while the questions regarding care during delivery have unacceptable reliability. [2] It determines that no questions need to be deleted for care during labor, but that all questions should be deleted for care during delivery based on their poor reliability. [3] The response supports these conclusions with literature on interpreting Cronbach's alpha and the acceptable ranges for reliability.

    Original Title

    Azarcon_Interpretation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses the results of a study analyzing the reliability of questions assessing care during labor and care during delivery. [1] It finds that the questions regarding care during labor have acceptable reliability, while the questions regarding care during delivery have unacceptable reliability. [2] It determines that no questions need to be deleted for care during labor, but that all questions should be deleted for care during delivery based on their poor reliability. [3] The response supports these conclusions with literature on interpreting Cronbach's alpha and the acceptable ranges for reliability.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    12 views2 pages

    Azarcon Interpretation

    Uploaded by

    ROGEN KATE AZARCON
    This document discusses the results of a study analyzing the reliability of questions assessing care during labor and care during delivery. [1] It finds that the questions regarding care during labor have acceptable reliability, while the questions regarding care during delivery have unacceptable reliability. [2] It determines that no questions need to be deleted for care during labor, but that all questions should be deleted for care during delivery based on their poor reliability. [3] The response supports these conclusions with literature on interpreting Cronbach's alpha and the acceptable ranges for reliability.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    FATHER SATURNINO URIOS UNIVERSITY

    San Francisco St. Butuan City 8600, Region XIII Caraga, Philippines

    Nursing Program

    Name: Azarcon, Rogen Kate


    Subject: Research 2 (with CAIP)

    A. Care during labor B. Care During Delivery

    1. State the difference between the two results (Care during labor and Care During Delivery) (10
    points)
    • In my understanding, the difference between the results of Care During Labor and Care During
    Delivery is that they do not have the same internal consistency of Cronbach’s alpha. Based on the
    rule of thumb, a Cronbach’s alpha below 0.7 is considered poor and not acceptable or reliable, while
    if it is in the range of 0.70 to 0.95 is considered to be reliable. Since the results or the internal
    consistency of questions in Care During Labor are all found to be good, then there are no questions
    that need to be deleted. While the questions under Care During Delivery are unacceptable,
    therefore all of the questions should be deleted.

    2. Are there items in the two results that you need to delete? Justify your answer with
    supporting literature. (10 points)
    A. CARE DURING LABOR
    • As mentioned above, since the results of the questions under Care During Labor are all found to
    be good, there are no questions to be deleted. According to Arafat (2016), when interpreting
    Cronbach’s Alpha (α), it ranges from 0 to 1. A value of ≥0.70 reflects good reliability. Although there
    are no questions to be deleted, there is still a need for further studies to improve the internal
    consistency of the instrument aimed at the organization of integrated systems for care to gestation,
    childbirth, and birth (Coluci et al., 2015).

    B. CARE DURING DELIVERY


    •According to a study by Daud et al., (2018), if the value of the Cronbach Alpha is at 0.60 and below,
    then it would mean that the instrument has a low reliability and it’s unacceptable. However, if the
    value of Cronbach Alpha is within the range of 0.60 to 0.80, then it is considered to be moderate
    and acceptable. Since the results and the internal consistency of questions under Care During
    Delivery are all in the poor and unacceptable range, then I believe all of the questions should be
    deleted.
    References:

    Arafat, S. M. (2016). Psychometric validation of the Bangla version of the patient-doctor relationship
    questionnaire. Psychiatry Journal, 2016. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/psychiatry/2016/9385364/

    Coluci, M. Z. O., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Milani, D. (2015). Construction of measurement instruments in the
    area of health. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 20(3), 925.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969829/

    Daud, K. A. M., Khidzir, N. Z., Ismail, A. R., & Abdullah, F. A. (2018). Validity and reliability of instrument to
    measure social media skills among small and medium entrepreneurs at Pengkalan Datu River. International
    Journal of Development and sustainability, 7(3), 1026-1037. https://isdsnet.com/ijds-v7n3-15.pdf

    You might also like