HE Ontract CT 1 September 1872 (1 September 1872) : Q No.1-When The Law of Contract Enacted?
HE Ontract CT 1 September 1872 (1 September 1872) : Q No.1-When The Law of Contract Enacted?
HE Ontract CT 1 September 1872 (1 September 1872) : Q No.1-When The Law of Contract Enacted?
THE
Contract Act
1st September 1872
[1st September 1872]
Effect of undue influence on contract:- According to section 19, when consent to an agreement is
caused by undue influence, the agreement is contracted void-able at the option of the party
whose consent was so caused.
The burden of proof:- Proof of undue influence shall be upon a person whose consent was
caused.
Void Contract:- A contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to
be enforceable (Section 2-j of Contract Act).
Void-able Contract:- An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one party but not
at the option of other is a void-able contract (Section 2-i).
The burden of proof for void-able contract:- It lies on the party who claims that his consent was
caused by correction, undue influence, fraud or by misrepresentation.
Un-enforceable contract:- It is one where the contract is perfectly valid on its substance but which
can not be enforced because of certain technical defects “by want of stamp, by a bar of limitation
etc”.
Promisor:- The person proposing is called promisor and the person accepting the promise is
called promisee.
Consideration:- The consideration is the price for which the promise of the other is brought and
the promise thus given for the value of enforceable.
Q No.9- State the exceptions to the rule that an agreement without consideration is void? The
exception that rule?
Ans:
1. Agreement made on natural love and affection 25(1).
Illustration No.1:- A for natural love and affection promise to give his son B Rs. 1000/=, A puts
his promise to B in writing and registers it. This is a contract without consideration.
2. A promise to compensate wholly or in part:- a person who has already voluntarily done
something for the promisor is enforceable even there is no consideration.
An Agreement which is expressed in writing and signed by the person to charge with it, to pay
wholly or in part a debt barred by law of limitation is enforceable at law even if it is made
without consideration.
5. Contract of agency:- 25(5):- A promises to sale B’s Car on his behalf. An agreement between A
& B is valid even without consideration.
6. Agreement to remit by promisee:- Where a promisee remits a part of debit and gives a
discharge for the whole debit on receiving the reduced amount there is no need for consideration.
7. An agreement under seal:- In English law contract under seal is enforceable without
consideration “A contract under seal means a contract which is in writing and which is signed,
sealed and delivered”
-3–
Q No.10- What are the wagering contracts, differentiate between wagering and contingent
contract?
Ans: Section 30 defines as wager means abate something stated to be lost or won upon the result
of some future uncertain event.
In this, parties are not interested in the In a contingent contract, the parties have a real
occurrence of the event except for winning or interest in the occurrence or non-occurrence of
losing the back amount. an event.
Q No.11- the general rule is that all the wagering agreement are absolutely void, exceptions to
this rule?
Ans: 1. Horse Race, 2. Crossword competition.
Q No.12- Who are the persons by whom a contract may or must be performed? Can a contract be
performed by a person other than a party to it?
Ans: Section 40 says:
1. Promisor himself:- In case of a contract involving the exercising the personal skills the
promisor must himself perform the contract.
2. Promisor or his agent:- A promises B to sale sugar. A must perform this promise himself
or he should ask his agent to perform the contract.
3. A legal representative of promisor:- Section 37 defines, promisors binds the legal
representative of the promisor in case of death of such promisor, before performance
unless a contrary intention appears from the contract.
4. Third-person or third party:- According to Section 4, when a person accepts performance
of the promisee from a third person or party, he can not afterwards enforce it again to the
promisor.
Kinds of Novation:-
1. A Novation involving a change of parties.
2. A Novation involving substituting of a new contract in place of the old contract.
Q No.14- What is meant by breach of contract and what are the different remedies available to an
aggrieved party as a result of a breach of contract?
Ans: Section 73. Parties to a contract are expected to perform their respective promises,
sometimes one of the parties breaches the contract by refusing to perform the promise, this is
known as breach of contract.
1. The recession of the contract:- If one party has broken his contract, the other party may
refuse further performance and may successfully define a suit for non-performance. He is
faced with all his obligations under the contract.
2. Suit for damages:- When a contract is breached the injured party can claim the damages.
a) Meaning of damages:- Damages mean compensation in terms of money for the loss
suffered by the injured party.
b) The object of damages:- The object is to put the injured party into the position, in which
he would have been had there been performance and not breach.
c) Kinds of damages:-
1. Ordinary damages:- Ordinary damages are general damages calculated in such a
way as to compensate for the loss suffered by the aggrieved or injured party. In
Ordinary damages, remote and indirect consequences are not regarded.
2. Special damages:- Those damages which result in the breach under special or
peculiar circumstances.
Illustration: A is the owner of the mill and he delivers the machine to a common carrier to be
carried for repair to another town. It is also in the knowledge of the carrier that for want of the
machine to mill was stopped and he promises to carry that machine for immediate dispatch. If
the carrier facts to return the machine in time he will be liable for profit that would have occurred
to the Mill owner.
3. Exemplary Damages:- These damages are awarded by way of punishment only two cases:
1. In breach of promise to marry:- The number of damages will be determined by the extent of
injury to the lady’s feeling. The amount may be quite heavy.
2. Wrongful dishonour of cheque by a Banker:- In above care, a drawer of the cheque may be
awarded heavy damages against the Banker _______ upon the loss of credit and reputation of
drawer on account of dishonour the cheque.
3. Nominal Damages:- These damages are consist of a sum of money which is very small in
quantity. Where the Court, found that the party has not actually suffered many damages or when
the Court believes that breach ______________ petty, the Court allows petty, the Court allows
petty sum as damages.
4. Suit upon Quantum Merit:- The above phrase means “As much as earned”. A person can
under certain circumstances claim payment for work done or goods supplied where a contract
has terminated by breach of contract or has become void for some reason. The injured party is
entitled to claim reasonable compensation what he has done under contract.
4. Suit for specific performance:- In certain cases by breach of contract, the damages are
inadequate. The Court may in such cases direct the party to perform the contract.
5. Injunction:- An injunction is an order of the Court restraining a person from doing some act. It
will be granted to enforce a negative stipulation in a contract where damages would not be an
adequate remedy.
6. Restitution of Benefit:- When a person, at whose option the contract is void-able, ________ such
contract, he must restore to the other party any benefit which may have received, for example,
when a contract for the sale of a house is voided on the ground of undue influence any money
received on account of the piece must be refunded.
Ans: Section 124, A contract by which one party promise to save the other from loss caused to
him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person is called the
contract of indemnity. (Indemnifier parties and indemnified/indemnity holder).
The person giving guaranty is called the surety, on whose behalf the guaranty is given is called
principal debtor and the person to whom a guaranty is given is called a creditor.
For a contract of guaranty and suretyship, there must be a tri-party agreement between the
creditor, principal debtor and surety. In the case of a contract of indemnity, indemnity doesn't
need to act at the request of the debtor, whereas in guaranty and surety, surety or guaranter must
give the guaranty at the request of debtor.
2. In case of a contract of indemnity, it is the direct engagement between two parties thereto,
whereas in guaranty there are three parties, the creditor, debtor and the surety who undertakes at
the request of a debtor to answer the default or miscarriage.
Several combats:- There is only one contract in a contract of indemnity between indemnifier and
indemnity holder.
While the contract of guarantee there are three contracts, one between principal debtor and
creditors, second between creditor and surety third between creditor and P.D.
Liability:- In a contract of indemnity, the liability of the indemnifier is primary and independent,
while in the contract of guarantee the liability of the surety is not primary but secondary.
Q No.17- How surety can be discharged from his liability in contract of guarantee?
Ans:
1. Revocation Section 130, A continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety as to
future transaction by notice to the creditor.
2. By the death of surety, S. 131.
3. by variance in the contract, S. 132.
4. Release or discharge of the principal debtor, S. 134.
5. Arrangement without surety’s consent. When a creditor compound or gives time to or agrees
not to sue the principal debtor, the surety is discharged.
6. Creditor act’s or omission, S. 139.
7. Loss of security, S. 141. Where there is more than one surety in a contract guarantee, every
surety is liable to avail the concession at the contract to which any surety has availed in any case.
S. 141.
Q No.18- What is the contract of bailment? When and how can it be revoked?
-6–
Ans: A bailment is a delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose upon a
contract that they shall when the purpose is accomplished be returned or otherwise as per the
direction of the bailer.
Essentials:
1. Delivery of possession.
2. Delivery should be upon a contract.
3. Delivery must be upon a specific purpose.
4. No change of ownership.
5. Return of goods.
Termination/Revocation of bailment:-
1. Expiry of time, in the contract of bailment, is for specified of time.
2. The accomplishment of purpose.
3. Un-authorized use.
4. On Death.
5. Termination of the bailer.
6. Destruction of the subject matter.
Kinds of Bailment:-
1. Deposit:- A simple type of bailment for the keeping of goods Eg. The safe vault in Bank.
2. Commodatum:- When the goods are lent to friends gratis to be used by him.
3. Hire:- When the goods are delivered to be the bailee for bier.
4. Pawn:- When the goods are delivered to another by way of security for money barred.
5. Non-Gratuitous bailment:- When the goods are delivered to be carries or something to be done
about these for the reward to be payable to the bailment.
6. Gratuitous bailment:- When the goods are delivered to be carried or something is done without
receiving.
Duties of bailee
Rights of bailee
Ans: The bailment of goods as a security for payment of debt or performance of a promise is
called pledge.
Duties of Pawner:-
1. To compensate the pawner.
2. To complete obligation.
Duties of Pawnee:-
1. Take reasonable care of goods.
2. Un-Authorized use.
3. Not to mix goods pledge with others.
4. Not to act inconsistently with conditions.
5. Returns the goods when dues are discharged or stipulated time.
Q No.___ Can a valid pledge be made by a person other than the owner?
Ans: Yes, Ordinarily the pledge is made by the real owner a person who owns goods of the
others can not make a valid pledge, but there is an exception to the rule:
1. By mercantile agent, S. 178.
Q No.___ Define and explain the agent and principle (S. 182)?
Ans:
Principal:- Principal is a person who is agreed to be represented by the agent. Any person who is
of the age of majority according to subjected law, of sound mind, may become principal.
Agent:- Agent is a person implied to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings
with the third person is called an agent.
An Agreement can neither sue nor be sued personally in respect of a contract made by him for his
principal.
Essentials of agency:
1. Competency to contract.
2. Agreement.
3. Consideration not necessary, S. 185.
4. Intention.
Creation of Agency:-
1. By direct appointment.
2. by implication.
Revocation of Agency:-
1. Mutual Agreement.
2. Revocation by the principal.
3. Revocation by agent (Renunciation by an agent to the principal)
4. Completion of Burness.
5. Principal or agents dealing.
6. Principal or agent comes an unsound mind.
7. Insolvency of Principal.
8. On the expiry of time.
9. Winding up of Company.
10. Destruction of the subject matter.
Principal Duties:-
1. Duty to indemnify.
2. Duty to indemnify for acts done in good faith.
3. Duty to compensate for the agent for injury.
Agent Rights:-
1. Right to retain.
2. Right to receive the commission.
3. Right to a lien.
4. Right to be indemnified against consequences act done in good faith.
5. Right of compensation for injury.
6. Right of stoppage of goods in transit.
-9–
Agents Duties:-
1. Duty to follow the direction of custom.
2. Duty to conduct business with reasonable care.
3. Duty to render an account.
4. Duty to communicate with the principal.
5. Duty not to deal on his record.
6. Duty not to make any secrete profit.
7. Duty to pay all sums.
8. Duty not to delegate authority.
9. Duty on termination of agency contained in S. 209.
Sub-Agent (S. 191):- A Sub-Agent is a person employed by and acting under the control of the
original agent in the business of the agency.
Co-Agent:- Where an authority is expressly given on several people with no stipulation is called
co-agent.