Module 7
Module 7
Module 7
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children), 2015 defines adoption as “the process
through which the adopted child is permanently separated from his biological parents and
becomes the lawful child of his adoptive parents with all the rights, privileges and
responsibilities that are attached to a biological child.”
In legal term, adoption refers to a legal proceeding that develops a parent-child relation
between persons not related by blood; therefore, creating a non-biological relation between
the parent and the child.
The adopted child receives the same privileges as the natural child of the adoptive child,
therefore creating no difference between the two except that of blood.
Adoption was prevalent in ancient India due to cultural and religious reasons. A prominent
reason for this being the need of a son during funerary rights which are practiced until today.
Hindu law:
Hindu law is the only law that gives single parents and couples the power to adopted a child
as an equal to a natural child because of the notion that a son is necessary for the family’s
material well-being.
Earlier, Hindu law allowed the adoption of only a male child and many rules and limitations
on Caste were enforced- adoption of female child was prohibited.
Such constraints have changed with the course of time.
At present, under modern Hindu law, any Hindu male or female has the right to adopt if he
or she has achieved the majority and is of sound mind.
Muslim, Christian and Parsi do not have any Act or law that governs adoption proceedings.
The Act allows for “Guardianship” but doe not allow complete adoption.
A child is held to be a “ward” and the interested couple their “guardian”.
THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, 2015: Chapter VIII
CARA guidelines:
Cases:
Hanmant Laxman salunke v Shrirangnarayan kanse, (2006), Bombay HC held that while a
custom permits adoption above 15 years, but the age difference between adoptive mother
and the adopted son was less than 21 years. The adoption was held to be invalid. (Section 10
of Hindu Adoption Act)
Oriental insurance Co. Ltd . v Lalitha sharma, 2006, SC, mere fact of child living with father
and step mother is not a proof of adoption.
In Re: Adoption of Payal Sharinee Vinay Pathak and his wife Sonika Sahay Pathak- (2010)
The question arose whether a Hindu couple having a natural child could adopt a child of the
same gender under the provisions of JJ Act.?
Court held that the JJ Act provided for the adoption of children who are abandoned
and are need of care and protection. Therefore, they are a specific and distinct
category of children. Although, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act imposes a
restriction, but it has to be read harmoniously with the JJ Act. Therefore, a child
could be adopted by a Hindu couple under JJ act if the child completed the
description of the specific category of children for whom the JJ Act was enacted.
Shabnam Hashmi v. UOI (2014)
In this case the petitioner was a Muslim who had adopted a young girl when she was
small.
She filed a petition for recognition of the right that a person belonging to any religion
could adopt a child since Muslim Law did not allow for adoption.
The SC held that the Juvenile Justice Act was an enabling legislation and it aims at
achieving the purpose of Uniform Civil Code.
Thus, it was held that any person belonging to any religion could adopt a child
subject to the rules framed.
Yaqoob Laway v. Gulla (2005) JKJ
A petition was filled by a person for declaration that he was the adopted child of the
couple and entitled to a share in the property of the couple.
Defendants submitted that they are Muslims and Muslim law do not allow for
adoption- hence no right in property.
Court held that even if there is no law for adoption by Muslim, if certain local
customs allowed for adoption, then adoption may be allowed- however it does not
mean a right in property is created.
The court also held that if a person can show that a property was gifted or given to
him by way of deed or document that an interest in the property has been created-
it will so be.
The court held that no adoption is created and even if customary law in taken into
account, in the absence of a document to prove that the property had been gifted to
the claimant- not entitled to a share in the property.
A.S. Sailaja v Principal Kurnool Medical, AIR 1986-
In this case, a girl had applied for an entrance exam for a medical course and she
filled details of her biological father.
In the application for taking admission in the college, she filled the name of her
adopted father and also stated that she was claiming social status that she had
previously not claimed it.
She had also filed a Xerox of an adoption deed and a certificate of caste belonging to
her adopted father.
She was given provisional admission as a backward class however, later she was
asked for her adoption and caste certificates and she was also told that in the
absence of the same, her admission will be struck off.
The court held that since the adoption was valid, the girl had every right same as the
natural child of the adopted father.
However, with regard to the caste, it could not pass to her since she had not faced
any difficulty in her upbringing or faced any disability.
She was entitled to rights under personal laws however, she could not get the
benefits of caste reservations.
Laxmi Kant Panndey v. UOI-
In this case, a letter by an advocate was treated as Public Interest wherein it was
stated that voluntary and social organizations and agencies were indulging in
malpractices by offering services of inter-country adoption.
The children were ending up in poor condition being forced into beggary and other
horrendous things.
The SC took judicial notice and directions were issues.
It was directed that every application of adoption by a foreigner must be sponsored
by a child/social welfare agency of the foreigner’s country. The Biological parent
must never get to know who is adopting the child. All details of the family, assets,
liabilities, recent photos, medical history etc must be submitted along with the
application.
It was further directed that the government would intimate the embassy in that
country to keep a watch on the welfare of the child and safeguard against any ill
treatment.
Guardianship:
The Hindu law of guardianship of minor children has been codified and reformed by the
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
Section 4 (a) defines a minor as a person who has not attained the age of 18 years.
Section 4 (b) defines a person having the care of the person of a minor or of his property or
of both his person and property. Guardians includes:
Natural guardian
Guardian appointed by the will of the minor’s father or mother
a guardian appointed or declared by a court,
a person empowered to act as such by or under any enactment relating to any Court
of wards.
Section 6: Natural guardians of a Hindu minor:
The natural guardians of a Hindu minor; in respect of the minor's person as well as in
respect of the minor’s property (excluding his or her undivided interest in joint family
property), are:
ᴏ (a) in the case of a boy or an unmarried girl—the father, and after him, the
mother: provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the
age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother;
ᴏ (b) in the case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the
mother, and after her, the father
ᴏ (c) in the case of a married girl—the husband:
ᴏ Provided that no person shall be entitled to act as the natural guardian of a
minor under the provisions of this section:
(a) if he has ceased to be a Hindu
(b) if he has completely and finally renounced the world
ᴏ Explanation—In this section, the expressions “father” and “mother” do not
include a step-father and a step-mother
In Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India and Vandana Shiva v. Jayanta
Bandhopadhaya (1999)
ᴏ SC held that under certain circumstances, even when the father is alive,
mother can act as a natural guardian. The term 'after' used in Section 6(a)
has been interpreted as 'in absence of' instead 'after the life-time”.
Section 8: powers of Natural guardians:
(1) The natural guardian of a Hindu minor has power, subject to the provisions of this
section, to do all acts which are necessary or reasonable and proper for the benefit
of the minor or for the realization, protection or benefit of the minor's estate; but
the guardian can in no case bind the minor by a personal covenant.
(2) The natural guardian shall not, without the previous permission of the court:
ᴏ (a) mortgage or charge, or transfer by sale, gift, exchange or otherwise, any
part of the immovable property of the minor
ᴏ (b) lease any part of such property for a term exceeding five years or for a
term extending more than one year beyond the date on which the minor
will attain majority.
(3) Any disposal of immovable property by a natural guardian, in contravention of
sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), is voidable at the instance of the minor or any
person claiming under him.
(4) No court shall grant permission to the natural guardian to do any of the acts
mentioned in subsection (2) except in case of necessity or for an evident advantage
to the minor.
Section 9: Testamentary guardians and their powers.
(1) A Hindu father entitled to act as the natural guardian of his minor legitimate
children may, by will appoint a guardian for any of them in respect of the minor’s
person or in respect of the minor’s property (other than the undivided interest
referred to in section 12) or in respect of both.
(2) An appointment made under sub-section (1) shall have no effect if the father
predeceases the mother, but shall revive if the mother dies without appointing, by
will, any person as guardian.
(3) A Hindu widow entitled to act as the natural guardian of her minor legitimate
children, and a Hindu mother entitled to act as the natural guardian of her minor
legitimate children by reason of the fact that the father has become disentitled to
act as such, may, by will, appoint a guardian for any of them in respect of the
minor’s person or in respect of the minor’s property (other than the undivided
interest referred to in section 12) or in respect of both.
(4) A Hindu mother entitled to act as the natural guardian of her minor illegitimate
children may; by will, appoint a guardian for any of them in respect of the minor’s
person or in respect of the minor's property or in respect of both
(5) The guardian so appointed by will has the right to act as the minor’s guardian
after the death of the minor’s father or mother, as the case may be, and to exercise
all the rights of a natural guardian under this Act to such extent and subject to such
restrictions, if any, as are specified in this Act and in the will
(6) The right of the guardian so appointed by will shall, where the minor is a girl,
cease on her marriage
Section 10: Incapacity of minor to act as guardian of property—A minor shall be incompetent
to act as guardian of the property of any minor.
Section 11: De facto guardian not to deal with minor’s property— no person shall be
entitled to dispose of, or deal with, the property of a Hindu minor merely on the ground of
his or her being the de facto guardian of the minor.
Section 12: No guardian can be appointed for the minor’s undivided interest in the
property.
Section 13: Court while appointing the guardian should give maximum consideration to the
welfare of the minor
Muslim law:
The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, which resides in the secular realm also, may be resorted
to.
The relevant provisions are reproduced herein: -
According to section 17 of the above-said Act, the matters of the case should be
considered by the court in appointing guardian. “ (1) In appointing or declaring the
guardian of a minor, the Court shall, subject to the provisions of this section, be
guided by what, consistently with the law to which the minor is subject, appears in
the circumstances to be for the welfare of the minor.
(2) In considering what will be the welfare of the minor, the Court shall have regard
to the age, sex and religion of the minor, the character and capacity of the
proposed guardian and his nearness of kin to the minor, the wishes, if any, of the
deceased parent, and any existing or previous relations of the proposed guardian
with the minor or his property.
(3) If the minor is old enough to form an intelligent preference, the Court may
consider that preference.
Section 19: Prohibits the Court from appointing guardians in certain cases:
Nothing in this Chapter shall authorize the Court to appoint or declare a guardian of
the property of a minor, whose property is under the superintendence of a Court of
Wards (CoW), or to appoint or declare a guardian of the person-
(a) Of a minor who is a married female and whose husband is not, in the
opinion of the Court, unfit to be guardian of her person. Or
(b) Of a minor whose father is living and is not, in the opinion of the Court,
unfit to be guardian of the person of the minor, or
(c) Of a minor whose property is under the superintendence of a Court of
Wards competent to appoint a guardian of the person of the minor
S.24. Duties of guardian of the person:
A guardian of the person of a ward is charged with the custody of the ward and must
look to his support, health and education, and such other matters as the law to
which the ward is subject requires.