Deity: Supernatural Divine Sacred God Goddess C. Scott Littleton Levels of Consciousness
Deity: Supernatural Divine Sacred God Goddess C. Scott Littleton Levels of Consciousness
Deity: Supernatural Divine Sacred God Goddess C. Scott Littleton Levels of Consciousness
A deity or god is a supernatural being who is considered divine or sacred.[1] The Oxford
Dictionary of English defines deity as a god or goddess, or anything revered as divine.[2] C. Scott
Littleton defines a deity as "a being with powers greater than those of ordinary humans, but who
interacts with humans, positively or negatively, in ways that carry humans to new levels of
consciousness, beyond the grounded preoccupations of ordinary life".[3]
Examples of representations of deities in different cultures; clockwise from upper left: Hinduism, Buddhism, Yoruba, Maya,
Roman, Shinto, Christianity, Greek, and Inca.
Religions can be categorized by how many deities they worship. Monotheistic religions accept
only one deity (predominantly referred to as "God"),[4][5] whereas polytheistic religions accept
multiple deities.[6] Henotheistic religions accept one supreme deity without denying other deities,
considering them as aspects of the same divine principle.[7][8] Nontheistic religions deny any
supreme eternal creator deity, but may accept a pantheon of deities which live, die and may be
reborn like any other being.[9]: 35–37 [10]: 357–58
Kobayashi Eitaku painting showing the god Izanagi (right) and Izanami, a goddess of creation and death in Japanese
mythology.
The English language word deity derives from Old French deité,[27] the Latin deitatem or "divine
nature", coined by Augustine of Hippo from deus ("god"). Deus is related through a common
Proto-Indo-European (PIE) origin to *deiwos.[28] This root yields the ancient Indian word Deva
meaning "to gleam, a shining one", from *div- "to shine", as well as Greek dios "divine" and Zeus;
and Latin deus "god" (Old Latin deivos).[29][30][31]: 230–31 Deva is masculine, and the related
feminine equivalent is devi.[32]: 496 Etymologically, the cognates of Devi are Latin dea and Greek
thea.[33] In Old Persian, daiva- means "demon, evil god",[30] while in Sanskrit it means the
opposite, referring to the "heavenly, divine, terrestrial things of high excellence, exalted, shining
ones".[32]: 496 [34][35]
The closely linked term "god" refers to "supreme being, deity", according to Douglas Harper,[36]
and is derived from Proto-Germanic *guthan, from PIE *ghut-, which means "that which is
invoked".[31]: 230–31 Guth in the Irish language means "voice". The term *ghut- is also the source
of Old Church Slavonic zovo ("to call"), Sanskrit huta- ("invoked", an epithet of Indra), from the
root *gheu(e)- ("to call, invoke."),[36]
An alternate etymology for the term "god" comes from the Proto-Germanic Gaut, which traces it
to the PIE root *ghu-to- ("poured"), derived from the root *gheu- ("to pour, pour a libation"). The
term *gheu- is also the source of the Greek khein "to pour".[36] Originally the German root was a
neuter noun. The gender of the monotheistic God shifted to masculine under the influence of
Christianity.[31]: 230–31 [36] In contrast, all ancient Indo-European cultures and mythologies
recognized both masculine and feminine deities.[35]
Definitions
Pantheists believe that the universe itself and everything in it forms a single, all-encompassing deity.[37][38]
There is no universally accepted consensus on what a deity is,[1] and concepts of deities vary
considerably across cultures.[1] Huw Owen states that the term "deity or god or its equivalent in
other languages" has a bewildering range of meanings and significance.[39]: vii–ix It has ranged
from "infinite transcendent being who created and lords over the universe" (God), to a "finite
entity or experience, with special significance or which evokes a special feeling" (god), to "a
concept in religious or philosophical context that relates to nature or magnified beings or a
supra-mundane realm", to "numerous other usages".[39]: vii–ix
Theism is the belief in the existence of one or more deities.[45][46] Polytheism is the belief in and
worship of multiple deities,[47] which are usually assembled into a pantheon of gods and
goddesses, with accompanying rituals.[47] In most polytheistic religions, the different gods and
goddesses are representations of forces of nature or ancestral principles, and can be viewed
either as autonomous or as aspects or emanations of a creator God or transcendental absolute
principle (monistic theologies), which manifests immanently in nature.[47] Henotheism accepts
the existence of more than one deity, but considers all deities as equivalent representations or
aspects of the same divine principle, the highest.[8][48][7][49] Monolatry is the belief that many
deities exist, but that only one of these deities may be validly worshipped.[50][51]
Monotheism is the belief that only one deity exists.[52][53][54][55][56][57][58] A monotheistic deity,
known as "God", is usually described as omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent
and eternal.[11][59] However, not all deities have been regarded this way[13][15][60][61] and an entity
does not need to be almighty, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent or eternal to qualify as a
deity.[13][15][60]
Deism is the belief that only one deity exists, who created the universe, but does not usually
intervene in the resulting world.[62][63][64] Deism was particularly popular among western
intellectuals during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.[65][66] Pantheism is the belief that
the universe itself is God[37] or that everything composes an all-encompassing, immanent
deity.[38] Pandeism is an intermediate position between these, proposing that the creator
became a pantheistic universe.[67] Panentheism is the belief that divinity pervades the universe,
but that it also transcends the universe.[68] Agnosticism is the position that it is impossible to
know for certain whether a deity of any kind exists.[69][70][71] Atheism is the non-belief in the
existence of any deity.[72]
Prehistoric
Statuette of a nude, corpulent, seated woman flanked by two felines from Çatalhöyük, dating to c. 6000 BCE, thought by
most archaeologists to represent a goddess of some kind.[73][74]
Scholars infer the probable existence of deities in the prehistoric period from inscriptions and
prehistoric arts such as cave drawings, but it is unclear what these sketches and paintings are
and why they were made.[75] Some engravings or sketches show animals, hunters or rituals.[76] It
was once common for archaeologists to interpret virtually every prehistoric female figurine as a
representation of a single, primordial goddess, the ancestor of historically attested goddesses
such as Inanna, Ishtar, Astarte, Cybele, and Aphrodite;[77] this approach has now generally been
discredited.[77] Modern archaeologists now generally recognize that it is impossible to
conclusively identify any prehistoric figurines as representations of any kind of deities, let alone
goddesses.[77] Nonetheless, it is possible to evaluate ancient representations on a case-by-case
basis and rate them on how likely they are to represent deities.[77] The Venus of Willendorf, a
female figurine found in Europe and dated to about 25,000 BCE has been interpreted by some as
an exemplar of a prehistoric female deity.[76] A number of probable representations of deities
have been discovered at 'Ain Ghazal[77] and the works of art uncovered at Çatalhöyük reveal
references to what is probably a complex mythology.[77]
Sub-Saharan African
Yoruba deity from Nigeria
Diverse African cultures developed theology and concepts of deities over their history. In Nigeria
and neighboring West African countries, for example, two prominent deities (locally called
Òrìṣà)[78] are found in the Yoruba religion, namely the god Ogun and the goddess Osun.[78] Ogun
is the primordial masculine deity as well as the archdivinity and guardian of occupations such as
tools making and use, metal working, hunting, war, protection and ascertaining equity and
justice.[79][80] Osun is an equally powerful primordial feminine deity and a multidimensional
guardian of fertility, water, maternal, health, social relations, love and peace.[78] Ogun and Osun
traditions were brought into the Americas on slave ships. They were preserved by the Africans in
their plantation communities, and their festivals continue to be observed.[78][79]
Egyptian
Egyptian tomb painting showing the gods Osiris, Anubis, and Horus, who are among the major deities in ancient Egyptian
religion.[85]
Ancient Egyptian culture revered numerous deities. Egyptian records and inscriptions list the
names of many whose nature is unknown and make vague references to other unnamed
deities.[86]: 73 Egyptologist James P. Allen estimates that more than 1,400 deities are named in
Egyptian texts,[87] whereas Christian Leitz offers an estimate of "thousands upon thousands" of
Egyptian deities.[88]: 393–94 Their terms for deities were nṯr (god), and feminine nṯrt
(goddess);[89]: 42 however, these terms may also have applied to any being – spirits and
deceased human beings, but not demons – who in some way were outside the sphere of
everyday life.[90]: 216 [89]: 62 Egyptian deities typically had an associated cult, role and
mythologies.[90]: 7–8, 83
Around 200 deities are prominent in the Pyramid texts and ancient temples of Egypt, many
zoomorphic. Among these, were Min (fertility god), Neith (creator goddess), Anubis, Atum, Bes,
Horus, Isis, Ra, Meretseger, Nut, Osiris, Shu, Sia and Thoth.[85]: 11–12 Most Egyptian deities
represented natural phenomenon, physical objects or social aspects of life, as hidden immanent
forces within these phenomena.[91][92] The deity Shu, for example represented air; the goddess
Meretseger represented parts of the earth, and the god Sia represented the abstract powers of
perception.[93]: 91, 147 Deities such as Ra and Osiris were associated with the judgement of the
dead and their care during the afterlife.[85]: 26–28 Major gods often had multiple roles and were
involved in multiple phenomena.[93]: 85–86
The first written evidence of deities are from early 3rd millennium BCE, likely emerging from
prehistoric beliefs.[94] However, deities became systematized and sophisticated after the
formation of an Egyptian state under the Pharaohs and their treatment as sacred kings who had
exclusive rights to interact with the gods, in the later part of the 3rd millennium BCE.[95][86]: 12–15
Through the early centuries of the common era, as Egyptians interacted and traded with
neighboring cultures, foreign deities were adopted and venerated.[96][88]: 160
Levantine
A 4th century BC drachm (quarter shekel) coin from the Persian province of Yehud Medinata, possibly representing
Yahweh seated on a winged and wheeled sun-throne.
The ancient Canaanites were polytheists who believed in a pantheon of deities,[97][98][99] the chief
of whom was the god El, who ruled alongside his consort Asherah and their seventy
sons.[97]: 22–24 [98][99] Baal was the god of storm, rain, vegetation and fertility,[97]: 68–127 while his
consort Anat was the goddess of war[97]: 131, 137–39 and Astarte, the West Semitic equivalent to
Ishtar, was the goddess of love.[97]: 146–49 The people of the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah
originally believed in these deities,[97][99][100] alongside their own national god Yahweh.[101][102] El
later became syncretized with Yahweh, who took over El's role as the head of the
pantheon,[97]: 13–17 with Asherah as his divine consort[103]: 45 [97]: 146 and the "sons of El" as his
offspring.[97]: 22–24 During the later years of the Kingdom of Judah, a monolatristic faction rose
to power insisting that only Yahweh was fit to be worshipped by the people of Judah.[97]: 229–33
Monolatry became enforced during the reforms of King Josiah in 621 BCE.[97]: 229 Finally, during
the national crisis of the Babylonian captivity, some Judahites began to teach that deities aside
from Yahweh were not just unfit to be worshipped, but did not exist.[104][39]: 4 The "sons of El"
were demoted from deities to angels.[97]: 22
Mesopotamian
Akkadian cylinder seal impression showing Wall relief of the Assyrian national
Inanna, the Sumerian goddess of love, sex, god Aššur in a "winged male"
and war hybrid iconography
Ancient Mesopotamian culture in southern Iraq had numerous dingir (deities, gods and
goddesses).[17]: 69–74 [105] Mesopotamian deities were almost exclusively
anthropomorphic.[106]: 93 [17]: 69–74 [107] They were thought to possess extraordinary powers[106]: 93
and were often envisioned as being of tremendous physical size.[106]: 93 They were generally
immortal,[106]: 93 but a few of them, particularly Dumuzid, Geshtinanna, and Gugalanna were said
to have either died or visited the underworld.[106]: 93 Both male and female deities were widely
venerated.[106]: 93
In the Sumerian pantheon, deities had multiple functions, which included presiding over
procreation, rains, irrigation, agriculture, destiny, and justice.[17]: 69–74 The gods were fed, clothed,
entertained, and worshipped to prevent natural catastrophes as well as to prevent social chaos
such as pillaging, rape, or atrocities.[17]: 69–74 [108]: 186 [106]: 93 Many of the Sumerian deities were
patron guardians of city-states.[108]
The most important deities in the Sumerian pantheon were known as the Anunnaki,[109] and
included deities known as the "seven gods who decree": An, Enlil, Enki, Ninhursag, Nanna, Utu
and Inanna.[109] After the conquest of Sumer by Sargon of Akkad, many Sumerian deities were
syncretized with East Semitic ones.[108] The goddess Inanna, syncretized with the East Semitic
Ishtar, became popular,[110][111]: xviii, xv [108]: 182 [106]: 106–09 with temples across
Mesopotamia.[112][106]: 106–09
The Mesopotamian mythology of the first millennium BCE treated Anšar (later Aššur) and Kišar
as primordial deities.[113] Marduk was a significant god among the Babylonians. He rose from an
obscure deity of the third millennium BCE to become one of the most important deities in the
Mesopotamian pantheon of the first millennium BCE. The Babylonians worshipped Marduk as
creator of heaven, earth and humankind, and as their national god.[17]: 62, 73 [114] Marduk's
iconography is zoomorphic and is most often found in Middle Eastern archaeological remains
depicted as a "snake-dragon" or a "human-animal hybrid".[115][116][117]
Indo-European
Germanic
The Kirkby Stephen Stone, discovered in Kirkby Stephen, England, depicts a bound figure, who some have theorized may
be the Germanic god Loki.
In Germanic languages, the terms cognate with 'god' such as Old English: god and Old Norse:
guð were originally neuter but became masculine, as in modern Germanic languages, after
Christianisation due their use in referring to the Christian god.[118]
In Norse mythology, Æsir (singular áss or ǫ́ss) are the principal group of gods,[119] while the term
ásynjur (singular ásynja) refers specifically to the female Æsir.[120] These terms, states John
Lindow, may be ultimately rooted in the Indo-European root for "breath" (as in "life giving force"),
and are cognate with Old English: os (a heathen god) and Gothic: anses.[121]: 49–50
Another group of deities found in Norse mythology are termed as Vanir, and are associated with
fertility. The Æsir and the Vanir went to war, according to the Nordic sources. The account in
Ynglinga saga describes the Æsir–Vanir War ending in truce and ultimate reconciliation of the
two into a single group of gods, after both sides chose peace, exchanged ambassadors
(hostages),[122]: 181 and intermarried.[121]: 52–53 [123]
The Norse mythology describes the cooperation after the war, as well as differences between
the Æsir and the Vanir which were considered scandalous by the other side.[122]: 181 The goddess
Freyja of the Vanir taught magic to the Æsir, while the two sides discover that while Æsir forbid
mating between siblings, Vanir accepted such mating.[122]: 181 [124][125]
Temples hosting images of Germanic deities (such as Thor, Odin and Freyr), as well as pagan
worship rituals, continued in Nordic countries into the 12th century, according to historical
records. It has been proposed that over time, Christian equivalents were substituted for the
Germanic deities to help suppress paganism, during Christianisation.[122]: 187–88 Worship of the
Germanic gods has been revived in the modern period as part of the new religious movement of
Heathenry.[126]
Greek
Several Greek deities probably trace back to more ancient Indo-European traditions, since the
gods and goddesses found in distant cultures are mythologically comparable and are
cognates.[31]: 230–31 [129]: 15–19 Eos, the Greek goddess of the dawn, for instance, is cognate to
Indic Ushas, Roman Aurora and Latvian Auseklis.[31]: 230–32 Zeus, the Greek king of gods, is
cognate to Latin Iūpiter, Old German Ziu, and Indic Dyaus, with whom he shares similar
mythologies.[31]: 230–32 [130] Other deities, such as Aphrodite, originated from the Near
East.[131][132][133][134]
Greek deities varied locally, but many shared panhellenic themes, celebrated similar festivals,
rites, and ritual grammar.[135] The most important deities in the Greek pantheon were the Twelve
Olympians: Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Aphrodite, Hermes, Demeter,
Dionysus, Hephaestus, and Ares.[129]: 125–70 Other important Greek deities included Hestia,
Hades and Heracles.[128]: 96–97 These deities later inspired the Dii Consentes galaxy of Roman
deities.[128]: 96–97
Besides the Olympians, the Greeks also worshipped various local deities.[129]: 170–81 [136] Among
these were the goat-legged god Pan (the guardian of shepherds and their flocks), Nymphs
(nature spirits associated with particular landforms), Naiads (who dwelled in springs), Dryads
(who were spirits of the trees), Nereids (who inhabited the sea), river gods, satyrs (a class of
lustful male nature spirits), and others. The dark powers of the underworld were represented by
the Erinyes (or Furies), said to pursue those guilty of crimes against blood-relatives.[136]
The Greek deities, like those in many other Indo-European traditions, were anthropomorphic.
Walter Burkert describes them as "persons, not abstractions, ideas or concepts".[129]: 182 They
had fantastic abilities and powers; each had some unique expertise and, in some aspects, a
specific and flawed personality.[137]: 52 They were not omnipotent and could be injured in some
circumstances.[138] Greek deities led to cults, were used politically and inspired votive offerings
for favors such as bountiful crops, healthy family, victory in war, or peace for a loved one recently
deceased.[128]: 94–95 [139]
Roman
4th-century Roman sarcophagus depicting the creation of man by Prometheus, with major Roman deities Jupiter, Neptune,
Mercury, Juno, Apollo, Vulcan watching.
The Roman pantheon had numerous deities, both Greek and non-Greek.[128]: 96–97 The more
famed deities, found in the mythologies and the 2nd millennium CE European arts, have been the
anthropomorphic deities syncretized with the Greek deities. These include the six gods and six
goddesses: Venus, Apollo, Mars, Diana, Minerva, Ceres, Vulcan, Juno, Mercury, Vesta, Neptune,
Jupiter (Jove, Zeus); as well Bacchus, Pluto and Hercules.[128]: 96–97 [140] The non-Greek major
deities include Janus, Fortuna, Vesta, Quirinus and Tellus (mother goddess, probably most
ancient).[128]: 96–97 [141] Some of the non-Greek deities had likely origins in more ancient European
culture such as the ancient Germanic religion, while others may have been borrowed, for political
reasons, from neighboring trade centers such as those in the Minoan or ancient Egyptian
civilization.[142][143][144]
The Roman deities, in a manner similar to the ancient Greeks, inspired community festivals,
rituals and sacrifices led by flamines (priests, pontifs), but priestesses (Vestal Virgins) were also
held in high esteem for maintaining sacred fire used in the votive rituals for deities.[128]: 100–01
Deities were also maintained in home shrines (lararium), such as Hestia honored in homes as
the goddess of fire hearth.[128]: 100–01 [145] This Roman religion held reverence for sacred fire, and
this is also found in Hebrew culture (Leviticus 6), Vedic culture's Homa, ancient Greeks and other
cultures.[145]
Ancient Roman scholars such as Varro and Cicero wrote treatises on the nature of gods of their
times.[146] Varro stated, in his Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum, that it is the superstitious man who
fears the gods, while the truly religious person venerates them as parents.[146] Cicero, in his
Academica, praised Varro for this and other insights.[146] According to Varro, there have been
three accounts of deities in the Roman society: the mythical account created by poets for
theatre and entertainment, the civil account used by people for veneration as well as by the city,
and the natural account created by the philosophers.[147] The best state is, adds Varro, where the
civil theology combines the poetic mythical account with the philosopher's.[147] The Roman
deities continued to be revered in Europe through the era of Constantine, and past 313 CE when
he issued the Edict of Toleration.[137]: 118–20
Native American
Inca
Left: Inti Raymi, a winter solstice festival of the Inca people, reveres Inti, the sun deity—offerings include round bread and
maize beer; Right: Deity Viracocha
The Inca culture has believed in Viracocha (also called Pachacutec) as the creator
deity.[148]: 27–30 [149]: 726–29 Viracocha has been an abstract deity to Inca culture, one who existed
before he created space and time.[150] All other deities of the Inca people have corresponded to
elements of nature.[148][149]: 726–29 Of these, the most important ones have been Inti (sun deity)
responsible for agricultural prosperity and as the father of the first Inca king, and Mama Qucha
the goddess of the sea, lakes, rivers and waters.[148] Inti in some mythologies is the son of
Viracocha and Mama Qucha.[148][151]
Inca people have revered many male and female deities.
Inca Sun deity festival Among the feminine deities have been Mama Kuka (goddess
Oh creator and Sun and Thunder, of joy), Mama Ch'aska (goddess of dawn), Mama Allpa
be forever copious, (goddess of harvest and earth, sometimes called Mama
do not make us old, Pacha or Pachamama), Mama Killa (moon goddess) and
let all things be at peace, Mama Sara (goddess of grain).[151][148]: 31–32 During and after
multiply the people,
the imposition of Christianity during Spanish colonialism, the
and let there be food,
Inca people retained their original beliefs in deities through
and let all things be fruitful.
syncretism, where they overlay the Christian God and
—Inti Raymi prayers[152] teachings over their original beliefs and practices.[153][154][155]
The male deity Inti became accepted as the Christian God, but
the Andean rituals centered around Inca deities have been
retained and continued thereafter into the modern era by the Inca people.[155][156]
In Maya culture, Kukulkan has been the supreme creator deity, also revered as the god of
reincarnation, water, fertility and wind.[149]: 797–98 The Maya people built step pyramid temples to
honor Kukulkan, aligning them to the Sun's position on the spring equinox.[149]: 843–44 Other
deities found at Maya archaeological sites include Xib Chac – the benevolent male rain deity, and
Ixchel – the benevolent female earth, weaving and pregnancy goddess.[149]: 843–44 The Maya
calendar had 18 months, each with 20 days (and five unlucky days of Uayeb); each month had a
presiding deity, who inspired social rituals, special trading markets and community festivals.[156]
A deity with aspects similar to Kulkulkan in the Aztec culture has been called
Quetzalcoatl.[149]: 797–98 However, states Timothy Insoll, the Aztec ideas of deity remain poorly
understood. What has been assumed is based on what was constructed by Christian
missionaries. The deity concept was likely more complex than these historical records.[157] In
Aztec culture, there were hundred of deities, but many were henotheistic incarnations of one
another (similar to the avatar concept of Hinduism). Unlike Hinduism and other cultures, Aztec
deities were usually not anthropomorphic, and were instead zoomorphic or hybrid icons
associated with spirits, natural phenomena or forces.[157][158] The Aztec deities were often
represented through ceramic figurines, revered in home shrines.[157][159]
Polynesian
The Polynesian people developed a theology centered on numerous deities, with clusters of
islands having different names for the same idea. There are great deities found across the
Pacific Ocean. Some deities are found widely, and there are many local deities whose worship is
limited to one or a few islands or sometimes to isolated villages on the same island.[160]: 5–6
The Māori people, of what is now New Zealand, called the supreme being as Io, who is also
referred elsewhere as Iho-Iho, Io-Mataaho, Io Nui, Te Io Ora, Io Matua Te Kora among other
names.[161]: 239 The Io deity has been revered as the original uncreated creator, with power of life,
with nothing outside or beyond him.[161]: 239 Other deities in the Polynesian pantheon include
Tangaloa (god who created men),[160]: 37–38 La'a Maomao (god of winds), Tu-Matauenga or Ku
(god of war), Tu-Metua (mother goddess), Kane (god of procreation) and Rangi (sky god
father).[161]: 261, 284, 399, 476
The Polynesian deities have been part of a sophisticated theology, addressing questions of
creation, the nature of existence, guardians in daily lives as well as during wars, natural
phenomena, good and evil spirits, priestly rituals, as well as linked to the journey of the souls of
the dead.[160]: 6–14, 37–38, 113, 323
Abrahamic
Christianity
Holy Trinity (1756–1758) by Szymon Czechowicz, showing God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy Spirit, all of whom
are revered in Christianity as a single deity.
The theological examination of Jesus Christ, of divine grace in incarnation, his non-
transferability and completeness has been a historic topic. For example, the Council of
Chalcedon in 451 CE declared that in "one person Jesus Christ, fullness of deity and fullness of
humanity are united, the union of the natures being such that they can neither be divided nor
confused".[167] Jesus Christ, according to the New Testament, is the self-disclosure of the one,
true God, both in his teaching and in his person; Christ, in Christian faith, is considered the
incarnation of God.[39]: 4, 29 [168][169]
Islam
Ilah, ʾIlāh (Arabic: ;إﻟﻪplural: آﻟﻬﺔʾālihah), is an Arabic word meaning "god".[170][171] It appears in the
name of the monotheistic god of Islam as Allah (al-Lāh).[172][173][174] which literally means "the
god" in Arabic.[170][171] Islam is strictly monotheistic[175] and the first statement of the shahada,
or Muslim confession of faith, is that "there is no ʾilāh (deity) but al-Lāh (God)",[176] who is
perfectly unified and utterly indivisible.[175][176][177]
The term Allah is used by Muslims for God. The Persian word Khuda (Persian: )ﺧﺪاcan be
translated as god, lord or king, and is also used today to refer to God in Islam by Persian, Urdu,
Tat and Kurdish speakers. The Turkic word for god is Tengri; it exists as Tanrı in Turkish.
Judaism
The tetragrammaton in Phoenician (12th century BCE to 150 BCE), Paleo-Hebrew (10th century BCE to 135 CE), and
square Hebrew (3rd century BCE to present) scripts.
Judaism affirms the existence of one God (Yahweh, or YHWH), who is not abstract, but He who
revealed himself throughout Jewish history particularly during the Exodus and the Exile.[39]: 4
Judaism reflects a monotheism that gradually arose, was affirmed with certainty in the sixth
century "Second Isaiah", and has ever since been the axiomatic basis of its theology.[39]: 4
The classical presentation of Judaism has been as a monotheistic faith that rejected deities and
related idolatry.[178] However, states Breslauer, modern scholarship suggests that idolatry was
not absent in biblical faith, and it resurfaced multiple times in Jewish religious life.[178] The
rabbinic texts and other secondary Jewish literature suggest worship of material objects and
natural phenomena through the medieval era, while the core teachings of Judaism maintained
monotheism.[178][179]
According to Aryeh Kaplan, God is always referred to as "He" in Judaism, "not to imply that the
concept of sex or gender applies to God", but because "there is no neuter in the Hebrew
language, and the Hebrew word for God is a masculine noun" as he "is an active rather than a
passive creative force".[180]
Mandaeism
In Mandaeism, Hayyi Rabbi (lit=The Great Life), or 'The Great Living God',[181] is the supreme God
from which all things emanate. He is also known as 'The First Life', since during the creation of
the material world, Yushamin emanated from Hayyi Rabbi as the "Second Life."[182] "The
principles of the Mandaean doctrine: the belief of the only one great God, Hayyi Rabbi, to whom
all absolute properties belong; He created all the worlds, formed the soul through his power, and
placed it by means of angels into the human body. So He created Adam and Eve, the first man
and woman."[183] Mandaeans recognize God to be the eternal, creator of all, the one and only in
domination who has no partner.[184]
Asian
Anitism
Left: Bakunawa depicted in a Bisaya sword hilt; Right: Ifugao rice deity statues
Anitism, composed of a diverse array of indigenous religions from the Philippines, has multiple
pantheon of deities, with each ethnic group having their own. The most notable deities are
almost always the deity or deities considered by specific ethnic groups as their supreme deity or
deities.[185]
Bathala is the Tagalog supreme deity,[186] while Mangechay is the Kapampangan supreme
deity.[187] The Sambal supreme deity is Malayari,[188] the Blaan supreme deity is Melu,[189] the
Bisaya supreme deity is Kaptan,[190] and so on. There are more than a hundred different ethnic
groups in the Philippines, each having their own supreme deity or deities. Each supreme deity or
deities normally rules over a pantheon of deities, contributing to the sheer diversity of deities in
Anitism.[185]
Buddhism
Left: Buddhist deity in Ssangbongsa in South Korea; Right: Chinese deity adopted into Buddhism
Buddhists do not believe in a creator deity.[191] However, deities are an essential part of Buddhist
teachings about cosmology, rebirth, and saṃsāra.[191] Buddhist deities (such as devas and
bodhisattvas) are believed to reside in a pleasant, heavenly realm within Buddhist cosmology,
which is typically subdivided into twenty six sub-realms.[192][191][9]: 35
Devas are numerous, but they are still mortal;[192] they live in the heavenly realm, then die and are
reborn like all other beings.[192] A rebirth in the heavenly realm is believed to be the result of
leading an ethical life and accumulating very good karma.[192] A deva does not need to work, and
is able to enjoy in the heavenly realm all pleasures found on Earth. However, the pleasures of this
realm lead to attachment (upādāna), lack of spiritual pursuits, and therefore no nirvana.[9]: 37 The
vast majority of Buddhist lay people in countries practicing Theravada, states Kevin Trainor, have
historically pursued Buddhist rituals and practices because they are motivated by their potential
rebirth into the deva realm.[192][193][194] The deva realm in Buddhist practice in Southeast Asia
and East Asia, states Keown, include gods found in Hindu traditions such as Indra and Brahma,
and concepts in Hindu cosmology such as Mount Meru.[9]: 37–38
Mahayana Buddhism also includes different kinds of deities, such as numerous Buddhas,
bodhisattvas and fierce deities.
Hinduism
Left: Ganesha deity of Hinduism; Right: Saraswati, Hindu goddess of knowledge and music
The concept of God varies in Hinduism, it being a diverse system of thought with beliefs
spanning henotheism, monotheism, polytheism, panentheism, pantheism and monism among
others.[195][196]
In the ancient Vedic texts of Hinduism, a deity is often referred to as Deva (god) or Devi
(goddess).[32]: 496 [34] The root of these terms mean "heavenly, divine, anything of
excellence".[32]: 492 [34] Deva is masculine, and the related feminine equivalent is devi. In the
earliest Vedic literature, all supernatural beings are called Asuras.[197]: 5–11, 22, 99–102 [32]: 121 Over
time, those with a benevolent nature become deities and are referred to as Sura, Deva or
Devi.[197]: 2–6 [198]
Devas or deities in Hindu texts differ from Greek or Roman theodicy, states Ray Billington,
because many Hindu traditions believe that a human being has the potential to be reborn as a
deva (or devi), by living an ethical life and building up saintly karma.[199] Such a deva enjoys
heavenly bliss, till the merit runs out, and then the soul (gender neutral) is reborn again into
Saṃsāra. Thus deities are henotheistic manifestations, embodiments and consequence of the
virtuous, the noble, the saint-like living in many Hindu traditions.[199]
Jainism
Like many ancient Indian traditions, Jainism does not believe in a creator, omnipotent,
omniscient, eternal God; however, the cosmology of Jainism incorporates a meaningful
causality-driven reality, and includes four realms of existence (gati), and one of them for deva
(celestial beings, gods).[10]: 351–57 A human being can choose and live an ethical life (karma),
such as being non-violent (ahimsa) against all living beings, thereby gain merit and be reborn as
deva.[10]: 357–58 [200]
Jain texts reject a trans-cosmic God, one who stands outside of the universe and lords over it,
but they state that the world is full of devas who are in human-image with sensory organs, with
the power of reason, conscious, compassionate and with finite life.[10]: 356–57 Jainism believes in
the existence of the soul (Self, atman) and considers it to have "god-quality", whose knowledge
and liberation is the ultimate spiritual goal in both religions. Jains also believe that the spiritual
nobleness of perfected souls (Jina) and devas make them worship-worthy beings, with powers
of guardianship and guidance to better karma. In Jain temples or festivals, the Jinas and Devas
are revered.[10]: 356–57 [201]
Zoroastrianism
Investiture of Sassanid emperor Shapur II (center) with Mithra (left) and Ahura Mazda (right) at Taq-e Bostan, Iran
Ahura Mazda (/əˌhʊrəˌmæzdə/);[202] is the Avestan name for the creator and sole God of
Zoroastrianism.[203] The literal meaning of the word Ahura is "mighty" or "lord" and Mazda is
wisdom.[203] Zoroaster, the founder of Zoroastrianism, taught that Ahura Mazda is the most
powerful being in all of the existence[204] and the only deity who is worthy of the highest
veneration.[204] Nonetheless, Ahura Mazda is not omnipotent because his evil twin brother Angra
Mainyu is nearly as powerful as him.[204] Zoroaster taught that the daevas were evil spirits
created by Angra Mainyu to sow evil in the world[204] and that all people must choose between
the goodness of Ahura Mazda and the evil of Angra Mainyu.[204] According to Zoroaster, Ahura
Mazda will eventually defeat Angra Mainyu and good will triumph over evil once and for all.[204]
Ahura Mazda was the most important deity in the ancient Achaemenid Empire.[205] He was
originally represented anthropomorphically,[203] but, by the end of the Sasanian Empire,
Zoroastrianism had become fully aniconic.[203]
Skeptical interpretations
The Greek philosopher Democritus argued that belief in deities arose when humans observed natural phenomena such as
lightning and attributed such phenomena to supernatural beings.
Attempts to rationally explain belief in deities extend all the way back to ancient
Greece.[129]: 311–17 The Greek philosopher Democritus argued that the concept of deities arose
when human beings observed natural phenomena such as lightning, solar eclipses, and the
changing of the seasons.[129]: 311–17 Later, in the third century BCE, the scholar Euhemerus
argued in his book Sacred History that the gods were originally flesh-and-blood mortal kings who
were posthumously deified, and that religion was therefore the continuation of these kings'
mortal reigns, a view now known as Euhemerism.[206] Sigmund Freud suggested that God
concepts are a projection of one's father.[207]
A tendency to believe in deities and other supernatural beings may be an integral part of the
human consciousness.[208][209][210][211]: 2–11 Children are naturally inclined to believe in
supernatural entities such as gods, spirits, and demons, even without being introduced into a
particular religious tradition.[211]: 2–11 Humans have an overactive agency detection
system,[208][212][211]: 25–27 which has a tendency to conclude that events are caused by intelligent
entities, even if they really are not.[208][212] This is a system which may have evolved to cope with
threats to the survival of human ancestors:[208] in the wild, a person who perceived intelligent
and potentially dangerous beings everywhere was more likely to survive than a person who
failed to perceive actual threats, such as wild animals or human enemies.[208][211]: 2–11 Humans
are also inclined to think teleologically and ascribe meaning and significance to their
surroundings, a trait which may lead people to believe in a creator-deity.[213] This may have
developed as a side effect of human social intelligence, the ability to discern what other people
are thinking.[213]
Stories of encounters with supernatural beings are especially likely to be retold, passed on, and
embellished due to their descriptions of standard ontological categories (person, artifact,
animal, plant, natural object) with counterintuitive properties (humans that are invisible, houses
that remember what happened in them, etc.).[214] As belief in deities spread, humans may have
attributed anthropomorphic thought processes to them,[215] leading to the idea of leaving
offerings to the gods and praying to them for assistance,[215] ideas which are seen in all cultures
around the world.[208]
Sociologists of religion have proposed that the personality and characteristics of deities may
reflect a culture's sense of self-esteem and that a culture projects its revered values into deities
and in spiritual terms. The cherished, desired or sought human personality is congruent with the
personality it defines to be gods.[207] Lonely and fearful societies tend to invent wrathful, violent,
submission-seeking deities, while happier and secure societies tend to invent loving, non-violent,
compassionate deities.[207] Émile Durkheim states that gods represent an extension of human
social life to include supernatural beings. According to Matt Rossano, God concepts may be a
means of enforcing morality and building more cooperative community groups.[216]
See also
Aeon (Gnosticism)
Apotheosis
Deicide
Hero cult
Imperial cult
List of deities
Odinism
References
4. Becking, Bob; Dijkstra, Meindert; Korpel, Marjo; Vriezen, Karel (2001). Only One God?: Monotheism in
Ancient Israel and the Veneration of the Goddess Asherah (https://books.google.com/books?id=eMneBA
AAQBAJ&pg=PA189) . London: New York. p. 189. ISBN 978-0-567-23212-0. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
"The Christian tradition is, in imitation of Judaism, a monotheistic religion. This implies that believers
accept the existence of only one God. Other deities either do not exist, are considered inferior, are seen
as the product of human imagination, or are dismissed as remnants of a persistent paganism"
7. Taliaferro, Charles; Harrison, Victoria S.; Goetz, Stewart (2012). The Routledge Companion to Theism (htt
ps://books.google.com/books?id=ct7fCgAAQBAJ) . Routledge. pp. 78–79. ISBN 978-1-136-33823-6.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
8. Reat, N. Ross; Perry, Edmund F. (1991). A World Theology: The Central Spiritual Reality of Humankind (htt
ps://books.google.com/books?id=vD2TJNc7NE4C) . Cambridge University Press. pp. 73–75. ISBN 978-
0-521-33159-3. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
10. Bullivant, Stephen; Ruse, Michael (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Atheism (https://books.google.com/b
ooks?id=jbIVAgAAQBAJ) . Oxford University Publishing. ISBN 978-0-19-964465-0. Retrieved 22 June
2017.
11. Taliaferro, Charles; Marty, Elsa J. (2010). A Dictionary of Philosophy of Religion (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=78962vlrCDcC&pg=PA98) . A&C Black. pp. 98–99. ISBN 978-1-4411-1197-5.
12. Trigger, Bruce G. (2003). Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=) (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 473–74. ISBN 978-0-521-82245-9.
13. Hood, Robert Earl (1990). Must God Remain Greek?: Afro Cultures and God-talk (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=-ceFU75KyYQC&pg=PA128) . Fortress Press. pp. 128–29. ISBN 978-1-4514-1726-5.
"African people may describe their deities as strong, but not omnipotent; wise but not omniscient; old but
not eternal; great but not omnipresent (...)"
14. Trigger, Bruce G. (2003). Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study (https://archive.org/deta
ils/understandingear0000trig) (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 441–42 (https://ar
chive.org/details/understandingear0000trig/page/441) . ISBN 978-0-521-82245-9. "[Historically...]
people perceived far fewer differences between themselves and the gods than the adherents of modern
monotheistic religions. Deities were not thought to be omniscient or omnipotent and were rarely believed
to be changeless or eternal"
15. Murdoch, John (1861). English Translations of Select Tracts, Published in India: With an Introd.
Containing Lists of the Tracts in Each Language (https://books.google.com/books?id=IHQAAAAAMAAJ&
pg=PA141) . Graves. pp. 141–42. "We [monotheists] find by reason and revelation that God is
omniscient, omnipotent, most holy, etc., but the Hindu deities possess none of those attributes. It is
mentioned in their Shastras that their deities were all vanquished by the Asurs, while they fought in the
heavens, and for fear of whom they left their abodes. This plainly shows that they are not omnipotent."
16. Kramarae, Cheris; Spender, Dale (2004). Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global
Women's Issues and Knowledge (https://books.google.com/books?id=QAOUAgAAQBAJ) . Routledge.
p. 655. ISBN 978-1-135-96315-6. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
17. O'Brien, Julia M. (2014). Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=ZU-nBAAAQBAJ) . Oxford University Press, Incorporated. ISBN 978-0-19-983699-4.
Retrieved 22 June 2017.
19. Pintchman, Tracy (2014). Seeking Mahadevi: Constructing the Identities of the Hindu Great Goddess (http
s://books.google.com/books?id=JfXdGInecRIC) . SUNY Press. pp. 1–2, 19–20. ISBN 978-0-7914-9049-
5. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
20. Roberts, Nathaniel (2016). To Be Cared For: The Power of Conversion and Foreignness of Belonging in an
Indian Slum (https://books.google.com/books?id=UVPQCwAAQBAJ) . University of California Press.
p. xv. ISBN 978-0-520-96363-4. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
21. Malandra, William W. (1983). An Introduction to Ancient Iranian Religion: Readings from the Avesta and
the Achaemenid Inscriptions (https://books.google.com/books?id=nZQMrjukmboC&pg=PA9) .
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-0-8166-1115-7. Retrieved 28 June
2017.
23. Potts, Daniel T. (1997). Mesopotamian Civilization: The Material Foundations (https://books.google.com/
books?id=OdZS9gBu4KwC&pg=PA272) (st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 272–74.
ISBN 978-0-8014-3339-9. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
24. Potter, Karl H. (2014). The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 3: Advaita Vedanta up to
Samkara and His Pupils (https://books.google.com/books?id=Ydf_AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA272) . Princeton
University Press. pp. 272–74. ISBN 978-1-4008-5651-0. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
25. Olivelle, Patrick (2006). The Samnyasa Upanisads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation (htt
ps://books.google.com/books?id=fB8uneM7q1cC&pg=PA47) . New York: Oxford University Press. p. 47.
ISBN 978-0-19-536137-7. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
26. Cush, Denise; Robinson, Catherine; York, Michael (2008). Encyclopedia of Hinduism (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=kzPgCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA899) . London: Routledge. pp. 899–900. ISBN 978-1-135-
18979-2. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
27. Hoad, T. F. (2008). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=CDaPuAAACAAJ) . Paw Prints. ISBN 978-1-4395-0571-7. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
31. Mallory, J.P.; Adams, D.Q. (1997). Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (https://books.google.com/boo
ks?id=tzU3RIV2BWIC) (1st ed.). London: Fitzroy Dearborn. ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5. Retrieved 22 June
2017.
32. Monier-Williams, Monier; Leumann, Ernst; Cappeller, Carl (2005). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary:
Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages
(https://books.google.com/books?id=zUezTfym7CAC&pg=PA496) (Corrected ed.). Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-3105-6. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
33. Hawley, John Stratton; Wulff, Donna M. (1998). Devī: Goddesses of India (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=CZrV3kOpMt0C&pg=PA2) (1st ed.). Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 2, 18–21. ISBN 978-81-208-1491-2.
35. Mallory, J.P.; Adams, D.Q. (2006). The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-
European world (https://books.google.com/books?id=iNUSDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA418) (Reprint ed.).
Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 418–23. ISBN 978-0-19-928791-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
36. "Online Etymology Dictionary –\ God" (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=god&allowed_in_fr
ame=0) . Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20170730023014/http://etymonline.com/index.php?te
rm=god&allowed_in_frame=0) from the original on 30 July 2017. Retrieved 6 June 2017.
37. Pearsall, Judy (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary Of English (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 1341.
ISBN 978-0-19-861263-6.
40. Gupta, Bina; Gupta, Professor of Philosophy and Director South Asia Language Area Center Bina (2012).
An Introduction to Indian Philosophy: Perspectives on Reality, Knowledge, and Freedom (https://books.go
ogle.com/books?id=-WepAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA21) . Routledge. pp. 21–25. ISBN 978-1-136-65310-0.
41. Gupta, Bina (2012). An Introduction to Indian Philosophy: Perspectives on Reality, Knowledge, and
Freedom (https://books.google.com/books?id=2mmpAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA88) . Taylor & Francis. pp. 88–
96. ISBN 978-1-136-65309-4.
42. Cohen, Signe (2008). Text and Authority in the Older Upaniṣads (https://books.google.com/books?id=dU
KwCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA40) . Brill. pp. 40, 219–20, 243–44. ISBN 978-90-474-3363-7.
44. Choon Kim, Yong; Freeman, David H. (1981). Oriental Thought: An Introduction to the Philosophical and
Religious Thought of Asia (https://books.google.com/books?id=omwMQA_DUVEC&pg=PA15) . Totowa,
NJ: Littlefield, Adams and Company. pp. 15–19. ISBN 978-0-8226-0365-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
47. Libbrecht, Ulrich (2007). Within the Four Seas: Introduction to Comparative Philosophy (https://books.goo
gle.com/books?id=rmT3ZHGxJPgC&pg=PA42) . Peeters Publishers. p. 42. ISBN 978-90-429-1812-2.
48. Monotheism (https://www.britannica.com/topic/monotheism) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/
20171229113308/https://www.britannica.com/topic/monotheism) 29 December 2017 at the Wayback
Machine and Polytheism (https://www.britannica.com/topic/polytheism) Archived (https://web.archive.
org/web/20201111205729/https://www.britannica.com/topic/polytheism) 11 November 2020 at the
Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica;
Louis Shores (1963). Collier's Encyclopedia: With Bibliography and Index (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=E2maKFG4CpMC) . Crowell-Collier Publishing. p. 179. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2021
0831002206/https://books.google.com/books?id=E2maKFG4CpMC) from the original on 31 August
2021. Retrieved 29 January 2018., Quote: "While admitting a plurality of gods, henotheism at the same
time affirms the paramount position of some one divine principle."
49. Rangar Cline (2011). Ancient Angels: Conceptualizing Angeloi in the Roman Empire (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=-pZHD6JtR_sC) . Brill Academic. pp. 40–41. ISBN 978-90-04-19453-3. Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20210427062942/https://books.google.com/books?id=-pZHD6JtR_sC) from
the original on 27 April 2021. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
50. Eakin, Frank Jr. (1971). The Religion and Culture of Israel. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. p. 70., Quote:
"Monolatry: The recognition of the existence of many gods but the consistent worship of one deity".
51. McConkie, Bruce R. (1979), Mormon Doctrine (2nd ed.), Salt Lake City, UT: Bookcraft, p. 351
53. Cross, F.L.; Livingstone, E.A., eds. (1974). "Monotheism". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (2
ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Beck, Guy L. (2005). Alternative Krishnas: Regional and Vernacular Variations on a Hindu Deity. Albany:
State University of New York Press. p. 169, note 11. ISBN 978-0-7914-6415-1.
61. Williams, George M. (2008). Handbook of Hindu Mythology (Reprint ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
pp. 24–35. ISBN 978-0-19-533261-2.
64. Kurian, George Thomas (2008). The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
ISBN 978-0-470-67060-6. "Deism is a rationalistic, critical approach to theism with an emphasis on
natural theology. The Deists attempted to reduce religion to what they regarded as its most foundational,
rationally justifiable elements. Deism is not, strictly speaking, the teaching that God wound up the world
like a watch and let it run on its own, though that teaching was embraced by some within the movement."
65. Thomsett, Michael C. (2011). Heresy in the Roman Catholic Church: A History (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=LDbhV7u1_yIC) . Jefferson: McFarland & Co. p. 222. ISBN 978-0-7864-8539-0. Retrieved
22 January 2018.
66. Wilson, Ellen Judy; Reill, Peter Hanns (2004). Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=t1pQ4YG-TDIC) (Revised ed.). New York: Facts On File. pp. 146–58. ISBN 978-0-8160-
5335-3. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
67. Sal Restivo (2021). "The End of God and the Beginning of Inquiry" (https://books.google.com/books?id=S
T4oEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA123) . Society and the Death of God. Routledge. p. 123. ISBN 978-0367637644.
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20210425040608/https://books.google.com/books?id=ST4oEAA
AQBAJ&pg=PA123) from the original on 25 April 2021. Retrieved 25 April 2021. "In the pandeism
argument, an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God creates the universe and in the process becomes the
universe and loses his powers to intervene in human affairs."
68. Fahlbusch, Erwin; Bromiley, Geoffrey William (2005). The Encyclopedia of Christianity (https://books.goog
le.com/books?id=sCY4sAjTGIYC&pg=PA21) . Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing
Company. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8028-2416-5. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
69. Borchert, Donald M. (2006). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2nd ed.). Detroit: Macmillan Reference.
p. 92 (https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofph0000unse/page/92) . ISBN 978-0-02-865780-6. "In
the most general use of the term, agnosticism is the view that we do not know whether there is a God or
not."
70. Craig, Edward; Floridi, Luciano (1998). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://books.google.com/
books?id=VQ-GhVWTH84C&pg=PA122) . London: Routledge. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-415-07310-3. Retrieved
22 January 2018. "In the popular sense, an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves in
God, whereas an atheist disbelieves in God. In the strict sense, however, agnosticism is the view that
human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God
exists or the belief that God does not exist. In so far as one holds that our beliefs are rational only if they
are sufficiently supported by human reason, the person who accepts the philosophical position of
agnosticism will hold that neither the belief that God exists nor the belief that God does not exist is
rational."
71. "agnostic, agnosticism". OED Online, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. 2012. "agnostic. : A. n[oun]. :# A
person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of immaterial things, especially of the
existence or nature of God. :# In extended use: a person who is not persuaded by or committed to a
particular point of view; a sceptic. Also: person of indeterminate ideology or conviction; an equivocator. :
B. adj[ective]. :# Of or relating to the belief that the existence of anything beyond and behind material
phenomena is unknown and (as far as can be judged) unknowable. Also: holding this belief. :# a. In
extended use: not committed to or persuaded by a particular point of view; sceptical. Also: politically or
ideologically unaligned; non-partisan, equivocal. agnosticism n. The doctrine or tenets of agnostics with
regard to the existence of anything beyond and behind material phenomena or to knowledge of a First
Cause or God."
73. Mellaart, James (1967). Catal Huyuk: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. McGraw-Hill. p. 181.
74. A typical assessment: "A terracotta statuette of a seated (mother) goddess giving birth with each hand
on the head of a leopard or panther from Çatalhöyük (dated around 6000 B.C.E.)" (Sarolta A. Takács,
"Cybele and Catullus' Attis", in Eugene N. Lane, Cybele, Attis and related cults: essays in memory of M.J.
Vermaseren 1996:376.
77. Lesure, Richard G. (2017). Insoll, Timothy (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Prehistoric Figurines (https://bo
oks.google.com/books?id=TdKdDgAAQBAJ&q=prehistoric+deities&pg=PA55) . Oxford: Oxford
University Press. pp. 54–58. ISBN 978-0-19-967561-6. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/202108310
02220/https://books.google.com/books?id=TdKdDgAAQBAJ&q=prehistoric+deities&pg=PA55) from
the original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
78. Murphy, Joseph M.; Sanford, Mei-Mei (2002). Osun across the Waters: A Yoruba Goddess in Africa and
the Americas (https://books.google.com/books?id=XIx0TjQb8yEC) . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Press. pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-0-253-10863-0. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
79. Barnes, Sandra T. (1997). Africa's Ogun: Old World and New (https://books.google.com/books?id=8OWjk
R-1btMC) (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. pp. ix–x, 1–3, 59, 132–34, 199–200.
ISBN 978-0-253-21083-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
80. Juang, Richard M.; Morrissette, Noelle (2007). Africa and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History (http
s://books.google.com/books?id=wFrAOqfhuGYC) . Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. pp. 843–44.
ISBN 978-1-85109-441-7. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
81. Andrews, Tamra (2000). Dictionary of Nature Myths: Legends of the Earth, Sea, and Sky (https://books.go
ogle.com/books?id=7jS65aClvFEC) . Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 6–7. ISBN 978-0-19-513677-7.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
82. Barnard, Alan (2001). Hunters and Herders of Southern Africa: A Comparative Ethnography of the
Khoisan Peoples (https://books.google.com/books?id=2nBx83jMc48C) . Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. pp. 87–88, 153–55, 252–56. ISBN 978-0-521-42865-1. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
83. Lynch, Patricia Ann; Roberts, Jeremy (2010). African Mythology, A to Z (https://books.google.com/books?
id=4Qiq4ps_wDIC) (2nd ed.). New York: Chelsea House. ISBN 978-1-4381-3133-7. Retrieved 22 June
2017.
84. Makward, Edris; Lilleleht, Mark; Saber, Ahmed (2004). North-south Linkages and Connections in
Continental and Diaspora African Literatures (https://books.google.com/books?id=zGUcI99zssYC) .
Trenton, NJ: Africa World. pp. 302–04. ISBN 978-1-59221-157-9. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
85. Pinch, Geraldine (2003). Egyptian Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Goddesses, and Traditions of Ancient
Egypt (https://books.google.com/books?id=3hgGNb6wM2kC) . New York: Oxford University Press.
ISBN 978-0-19-517024-5. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
86. Wilkinson, Richard H. (2003). The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt (https://archive.org/d
etails/completegodsgodd00wilk_0) . London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-05120-7.
87. Allen, James P. (July–August 1999). "Monotheism: The Egyptian Roots". Archaeology Odyssey. 2 (3): 44–
54, 59.
88. Johnston, Sarah Iles (2004). Religions of the Ancient World: A Guide. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01517-3.
89. Baines, John (1996). Conceptions of God in Egypt: The One and the Many (Revised ed.). Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-1223-3.
90. Assmann, Jan; Lorton, David (2001). The Search for God in Ancient Egypt (https://archive.org/details/sea
rchforgodinan00assm) (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-3786-1.
91. Allen, James P. (2001). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs.
New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 43–45. ISBN 978-0-521-77483-3.
92. Dunand, Françoise; Zivie-Coche, Christiane; Lorton, David (2004). Gods and Men in Egypt: 3000 BCE to
395 CE. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-8014-8853-5.
93. Hart, George (2005). Routledge Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Taylor &
Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-02362-4.
94. Wilkinson, Toby A.H. (1999). Early dynastic Egypt (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 261–62. ISBN 978-
0-415-18633-9.
95. Traunecker, Claude; Lorton, David (2001). The Gods of Egypt (https://archive.org/details/godsofegypt00tr
au/page/29) (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 29 (https://archive.org/details/godsofegy
pt00trau/page/29) . ISBN 978-0-8014-3834-9.
96. Shafer, Byron E.; Baines, John; Lesko, Leonard H.; Silverman, David P. (1991). Religion in Ancient Egypt:
Gods, Myths, and Personal Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-8014-9786-5.
97. Day, John (2002) [2000]. Yahweh and the Gods and Goddesses of Canaan (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=2xadCgAAQBAJ) . Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-8264-6830-7.
98. Coogan, Michael D.; Smith, Mark S. (2012). Stories from Ancient Canaan (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=G49SJI183IkC) (2nd ed.). Presbyterian Publishing Corp. p. 8. ISBN 978-90-5356-503-2.
99. Smith, Mark S. (2002). The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=1yM3AuBh4AsC&pg=PA28) (2nd ed.). Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-3972-5.
100. Albertz, Rainer (1994). A History of Israelite Religion, Volume I: From the Beginnings to the End of the
Monarchy (https://books.google.com/books?id=yvZUWbTftSgC&pg=PA89) . Westminster John Knox.
p. 61. ISBN 978-0-664-22719-7.
101. Miller, Patrick D (1986). A History of Ancient Israel and Judah (https://books.google.com/books?id=uDijjc
_D5P0C&pg=PA110) . Westminster John Knox Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-664-21262-9.
103. Niehr, Herbert (1995). "The Rise of YHWH in Judahite and Israelite Religion" (https://books.google.com/b
ooks?id=bua2dMa9fJ4C) . In Edelman, Diana Vikander (ed.). The Triumph of Elohim: From Yahwisms to
Judaisms. Peeters Publishers. ISBN 978-90-5356-503-2.
104. Betz, Arnold Gottfried (2000). "Monotheism" (https://books.google.com/books?id=qRtUqxkB7wkC&pg=P
A917=bible%20monotheism%20Betz) . In Freedman, David Noel; Myer, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans
Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans. p. 917. ISBN 978-90-5356-503-2.
106. Black, Jeremy; Green, Anthony; Rickards, Tessa (1998). Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient
Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary (https://books.google.com/books?id=05LXAAAAMAAJ&q=Inan
a) (2nd ed.). London: British Museum Press. ISBN 978-0-7141-1705-8. Archived (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20201120094829/https://books.google.com/books?id=05LXAAAAMAAJ&q=Inana) from the
original on 20 November 2020. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
108. Nemet-Nejat, Karen Rhea (1998). Daily Life in Ancient Mesopotamia (https://archive.org/details/dailylifei
nancie00neme/page/179) . Westport, CN: Greenwood Press. p. 179 (https://archive.org/details/dailylife
inancie00neme/page/179) . ISBN 978-0-313-29497-6.
109. Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character (https://archive.org/d
etails/sumerianstheirhi00samu) . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 122–23 (https://archive.or
g/details/sumerianstheirhi00samu/page/122) . ISBN 978-0-226-45238-8.
110. Leick, Gwendolyn (1998). A Dictionary of Ancient Near Eastern Mythology (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=c52EAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA91) (1st ed.). London: Routledge. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-415-19811-0.
Retrieved 22 January 2018.
111. Wolkstein, Diane; Kramer, Samuel Noah (1983). Inanna, Queen of Heaven and Earth: Her Stories and
Hymns from Sumer (https://archive.org/details/inannaqueenofhea00wolk) (1st ed.). New York: Harper
& Row. ISBN 978-0-06-090854-6.
112. Harris, Rivkah (February 1991). "Inanna-Ishtar as Paradox and a Coincidence of Opposites". History of
Religions. 30 (3): 261–78. doi:10.1086/463228 (https://doi.org/10.1086%2F463228) .
S2CID 162322517 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:162322517) .
113. "Ancient Mesopotamian Gods and Goddesses – Anšar and Kišar (god and goddess)" (http://oracc.museu
m.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/anarandkiar/) . Oracc. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2018111
6000951/http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/anarandkiar/) from the original on 16
November 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2017.
114. Leeming, David (2005). The Oxford Companion to World Mythology (https://books.google.com/books?id
=iPrhBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA122) . Oxford University Press. pp. 122–24. ISBN 978-0-19-028888-4. Retrieved
28 June 2017.
116. van der Toorn, Karel; Becking, Bob; van der Horst, Pieter W. (1999). Dictionary of Deities and Demons in
the Bible (2nd ed.). Leiden: Brill. pp. 543–49. ISBN 978-0-8028-2491-2.
117. Bienkowski, Piotr; Millard, Alan (2000). Dictionary of the ancient Near East (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=V9QrPMN1C4EC) . Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 246. ISBN 978-0-8122-
2115-2. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
121. Lindow, John (2002). Norse Mythology: A Guide to Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=jME8hD2UO4QC) . Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-983969-8. Retrieved
22 June 2017.
123. Gimbutas, Marija; Dexter, Miriam Robbins (2001). The Living Goddesses (https://books.google.com/book
s?id=7DfI39EDbMcC) (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. pp. 191–96. ISBN 978-0-
520-22915-0.
124. Christensen, Lisbeth Bredholt; Hammer, Olav; Warburton, David (2014). The Handbook of Religions in
Ancient Europe (https://books.google.com/books?id=rl5_BAAAQBAJ) . Routledge. pp. 328–29.
ISBN 978-1-317-54453-1. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
125. Oosten, Jarich G. (2015). The War of the Gods (RLE Myth): The Social Code in Indo-European Mythology
(https://books.google.com/books?id=5w_wBgAAQBAJ) . Routledge. p. 36. ISBN 978-1-317-55584-1.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
126. Horrell, Thad N. (2012). "Heathenry as a Postcolonial Movement" (https://submissions.scholasticahq.co
m/supporting_files/5682/attachment_versions/5685) . The Journal of Religion, Identity, and Politics. 1
(1): 1.
127. Martin, Thomas R. (2013). Ancient Greece: From Prehistoric to Hellenistic Times (https://books.google.c
om/books?id=iyFaMmr4hFwC) (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. 39–40. ISBN 978-0-
300-16005-5. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
130. West, Martin Litchfield (2007). Indo-European Poetry and Myth (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
pp. 166–73. ISBN 978-0-19-928075-9.
131. Breitenberger, Barbara (2005). Aphrodite and Eros: The Development of Greek Erotic Mythology (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=PSFePRxm1jAC&pg=PA10) . New York: Routledge. pp. 8–12. ISBN 978-0-
415-96823-2. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
133. Puhvel, Jaan (1989). Comparative Mythology (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University
Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-8018-3938-2.
134. Marcovich, Miroslav (1996). "From Ishtar to Aphrodite". Journal of Aesthetic Education. 39 (2): 43–59.
doi:10.2307/3333191 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3333191) . JSTOR 3333191 (https://www.jstor.org/st
able/3333191) .
135. Flensted-Jensen, Pernille (2000). Further Studies in the Ancient Greek Polis (https://books.google.com/b
ooks?id=uK8szXLlvjoC) . Stuttgart: Steiner. pp. 9–12. ISBN 978-3-515-07607-4. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
136. Pollard, John Ricard Thornhill; Adkins, A.W.H. (19 September 1998). "Greek religion" (https://www.britanni
ca.com/topic/Greek-religion) . Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/201803
09201523/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Greek-religion) from the original on 9 March 2018.
Retrieved 22 January 2018.
137. Campbell, Kenneth L. (2014). Western Civilization: A Global and Comparative Approach Volume I: To
1715 (https://books.google.com/books?id=Uy_fBQAAQBAJ) . Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-45227-0.
Retrieved 22 June 2017.
138. Stoll, Heinrich Wilhelm (1852). Handbook of the religion and mythology of the Greeks (https://books.goog
le.com/books?id=UWoBAAAAQAAJ&pg=4) . p. 3. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
139. Garland, Robert (1992). Introducing New Gods: The Politics of Athenian Religion (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=7Ne-bCX_DaUC) . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 1–9. ISBN 978-0-8014-2766-4.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
140. Long, Charlotte R. (1987). The Twelve Gods of Greece and Rome (https://books.google.com/books?id=3
dUUAAAAIAAJ) . Brill Archive. pp. 232–43. ISBN 978-90-04-07716-4. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
141. Woodard, Roger (2013). Myth, ritual, and the warrior in Roman and Indo-European antiquity (https://book
s.google.com/books?id=VkXlcVMP_dQC) (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 25–26,
93–96, 194–96. ISBN 978-1-107-02240-9. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
142. Ruiz, Angel (2013). Poetic Language and Religion in Greece and Rome (https://books.google.com/books?
id=yGUxBwAAQBAJ) . Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 90–91. ISBN 978-1-
4438-5565-5. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
143. Mysliwiec, Karol; Lorton, David (2000). The Twilight of Ancient Egypt: First Millennium B.C.E. (https://boo
ks.google.com/books?id=dJycxuhvS8UC) (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 188.
ISBN 978-0-8014-8630-2.
145. Kristensen, f. (1960). The Meaning of Religion Lectures in the Phenomenology of Religion (https://books.
google.com/books?id=p5QdmV3zNpIC) . Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. p. 138. ISBN 978-94-017-
6580-0. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
147. Barfield, Raymond (2011). The Ancient Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=PY9FbnNhdDUC) . Cambridge University Press. pp. 75–76. ISBN 978-1-139-49709-1.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
148. Roza, Greg (2007). Incan Mythology and Other Myths of the Andes (https://books.google.com/books?id=
vGuHuTzEXM4C) (1st ed.). New York: Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 27–30. ISBN 978-1-4042-0739-4.
Retrieved 22 June 2017.
149. Littleton, C. Scott (2005). Gods, Goddesses, and Mythology: Vol. 6 (https://books.google.com/books?id=
u27FpnXoyJQC) . Tarrytown, NY: Marshall Cavendish Corporation. ISBN 978-0-7614-7565-1. Retrieved
22 June 2017.
151. Sherman, Josepha (2015). Storytelling: An Encyclopedia of Mythology and Folklore (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=n2-sBwAAQBAJ) . Routledge. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-317-45938-5. Retrieved 28 June
2017.
152. Parker, Janet; Stanton, Julie (2006). Mythology: Myths, Legends and Fantasies (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=p7dR2w1Wv2sC) . Cape Town, South Africa: Struik. p. 501. ISBN 978-1-77007-453-8.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
153. Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (2010). Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of
Beliefs and Practices (https://books.google.com/books?id=v2yiyLLOj88C) (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara,
CA: ABC-CLIO. pp. 2243–44. ISBN 978-1-59884-204-3. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
154. Koschorke, Klaus; Ludwig, Frieder; Delgado, Mariano; Spliesgart, Roland (2007). A History of Christianity
in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, 1450–1990: A Documentary Sourcebook (https://books.google.com/b
ooks?id=dbq6fkyp698C) . Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans. pp. 323–25. ISBN 978-0-8028-2889-7.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
156. Fagan, Brian M.; Beck, Charlotte (2006). The Oxford Companion to Archaeology (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=ystMAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA345) . New York: Oxford University Press. p. 345. ISBN 978-0-19-
507618-9. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
157. Insoll, Timothy (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion (https://books.go
ogle.com/books?id=U4_ylNNHBy4C) . Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 563–67. ISBN 978-0-19-
923244-4. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
158. Issitt, Micah Lee; Main, Carlyn (2014). Hidden Religion: The Greatest Mysteries and Symbols of the
World's Religious Beliefs: The Greatest Mysteries and Symbols of the World's Religious Beliefs (https://bo
oks.google.com/books?id=kmFhBQAAQBAJ) . ABC-CLIO. pp. 373–75. ISBN 978-1-61069-478-0.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
159. Faust, Katherine A.; Richter, Kim N. (2015). The Huasteca: Culture, History, and Interregional Exchange (ht
tps://books.google.com/books?id=f5j_BwAAQBAJ) . University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 162–63.
ISBN 978-0-8061-4957-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
160. Williamson, Robert W. (2013). Religion and Social Organization in Central Polynesia (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=7RJaAQAAQBAJ) . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-62569-3. Retrieved
22 June 2017.
162. Emery, Gilles; Levering, Matthew (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity (https://books.google.com/b
ooks?id=3Zfs39-Ux7EC) . Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-955781-3. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
163. La Due, William J. (2003). Trinity Guide to the Trinity (https://books.google.com/books?id=0WvgLlSKW7o
C&q=Origen+Trinity&pg=PA37) . Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-56338-
395-3. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20210831002219/https://books.google.com/books?id=0W
vgLlSKW7oC&q=Origen+Trinity&pg=PA37) from the original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 16 October
2020.
164. Badcock, Gary D. (1997), Light of Truth and Fire of Love: A Theology of the Holy Spirit (https://books.goog
le.com/books?id=qnDyjaXPwooC&q=Origen+Subordinationist&pg=PA43) , GrandRapids, MI: Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing Company, p. 43, ISBN 978-0-8028-4288-6, archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20
210831002231/https://books.google.com/books?id=qnDyjaXPwooC&q=Origen+Subordinationist&pg=
PA43) from the original on 31 August 2021, retrieved 16 October 2020
165. Olson, Roger E. (1999). The Story of Christian Theology: Twenty Centuries of Tradition & Reform (https://
books.google.com/books?id=zexBAwAAQBAJ&q=Origen+Father+of+Theology&pg=PA100) . Downers
Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-8308-1505-0. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2021
0831002228/https://books.google.com/books?id=zexBAwAAQBAJ&q=Origen+Father+of+Theology&pg=
PA100) from the original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
166. Greggs, Tom (2009). Barth, Origen, and Universal Salvation: Restoring Particularity (https://books.google.
com/books?id=etQjYHmwiv4C&q=Origen+preexistence+of+souls&pg=PA55) . Oxford: Oxford University
Press. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-19-956048-6. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20210831002207/https://
books.google.com/books?id=etQjYHmwiv4C&q=Origen+preexistence+of+souls&pg=PA55) from the
original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
167. Larsen, Timothy; Treier, Daniel J. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Evangelical Theology (https://boo
ks.google.com/books?id=vlmXBe0RPxYC&pg=PA51) . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-
82750-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
168. Aslanoff, Catherine (1995). The Incarnate God: The Feasts and the life of Jesus Christ (https://books.goo
gle.com/books?id=QpVNuPwnIIcC) . Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-88141-
130-0. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
169. Inbody, Tyron (2005). The Faith of the Christian Church: An Introduction to Theology (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=cHvF2SiBn-kC) . Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 205–32.
ISBN 978-0-8028-4151-3. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
171. Vincent J. Cornell (2005). "God: God in Islam". In Lindsay Jones (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 5
(2nd ed.). MacMillan Reference. p. 724.
172. "God" (https://web.archive.org/web/20140327034958/http://www.pbs.org/empires/islam/faithgod.ht
ml) . Islam: Empire of Faith. PBS. Archived from the original (https://www.pbs.org/empires/islam/faithg
od.html) on 27 March 2014. Retrieved 18 December 2010.
173. "Islam and Christianity", Encyclopedia of Christianity (2001): Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews also
refer to God as Allāh.
175. Hammer, Juliane; Safi, Omid (2013). The Cambridge Companion to American Islam (https://books.googl
e.com/books?id=OBPKKFUyZaUC) (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 213. ISBN 978-
1-107-00241-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
176. Yust, Karen Marie (2006). Nurturing Child and Adolescent Spirituality: Perspectives from the World's
Religious Traditions (https://books.google.com/books?id=adMkAgAAQBAJ) . p. 300. ISBN 978-1-4616-
6590-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
177. Piamenta, Moshe (1983). The Muslim Conception of God and Human Welfare: As Reflected in Everyday
Arabic Speech (https://books.google.com/books?id=FOIUAAAAIAAJ) . Brill Archive. pp. 16–17.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
179. Kochan, Lionel (1990). Jews, Idols, and Messiahs: The Challenge from History (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=fWVsQgAACAAJ) . Oxford: B. Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-15477-8. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
180. Kaplan, Aryeh (1983). The Aryeh Kaplan Reader: The Gift He Left Behind : Collected Essays on Jewish
Themes from the Noted Writer and Thinker (https://books.google.com/books?id=bv5lmlmRmbwC)
(1st ed.). Brooklyn, NY: Mesorah Publications. pp. 144–45. ISBN 978-0-89906-173-3. Retrieved 28 June
2017.
181. Nashmi, Yuhana (24 April 2013), "Contemporary Issues for the Mandaean Faith" (http://www.mandaeanu
nion.com/history-english/item/488-mandaean-faith) , Mandaean Associations Union, archived (https://
web.archive.org/web/20211031155605/http://www.mandaeanunion.com/history-english/item/488-man
daean-faith) from the original on 31 October 2021, retrieved 8 October 2021
182. Buckley, Jorunn Jacobsen (2002). The Mandaeans: ancient texts and modern people. New York: Oxford
University Press. ISBN 0-19-515385-5. OCLC 65198443 (https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/65198443) .
183. Al-Saadi, Qais (27 September 2014), "Ginza Rabba "The Great Treasure" The Holy Book of the Mandaeans
in English" (http://www.mandaeanunion.com/component/k2/itemlist/category/45-mandaean-identity) ,
Mandaean Associations Union, archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20200716214027/http://www.ma
ndaeanunion.com/component/k2/itemlist/category/45-mandaean-identity) from the original on 16
July 2020, retrieved 8 October 2021
184. Hanish, Shak (2019). The Mandaeans In Iraq. In Rowe, Paul S. (2019). Routledge Handbook of Minorities
in the Middle East (https://www.google.com/books/edition/Routledge_Handbook_of_Minorities_in_the/b
OF1DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Routledge+Handbook+of+Minorities+in+the+Middle+East&printsec=
frontcover) . London and New York: Routledge. p. 163. ISBN 9781317233794. Archived (https://web.arc
hive.org/web/20220730071808/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Routledge_Handbook_of_Minori
ties_in_the/bOF1DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Routledge+Handbook+of+Minorities+in+the+Middle+Ea
st&printsec=frontcover) from the original on 30 July 2022. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
185. Anitism: a survey of religious beliefs native to the Philippines, SK Hislop - Asian Studies, 1971
189. Mabel Cook Cole, Philippine Folk Tales (Chicago: A. C. McClurg and Company, 1916), pp. 141-142.
190. John Maurice Miller in his 1904 collection “PHILIPPINE FOLKLORE STORIES”
191. McClelland, Norman C. (2010). Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma. Jefferson, NC: McFarland &
Company. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-7864-5675-8.
195. Lipner, Julius (2010). Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
p. 8. ISBN 978-0-415-45677-7. "(...) one need not be religious in the minimal sense described to be
accepted as a Hindu by Hindus, or describe oneself perfectly validly as Hindu. One may be polytheistic or
monotheistic, monistic or pantheistic, even an agnostic, humanist or atheist, and still be considered a
Hindu."
196. Chakravarti, Sitansu S. (1992). Hinduism, a Way of Life (https://books.google.com/books?id=J_-rASTgw8
wC&pg=PA71) (1st ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishing. p. 71. ISBN 978-81-208-0899-7.
Retrieved 28 June 2017.
197. Hale, Wash Edward (1986). Ásura in Early Vedic Religion (1st ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-
81-208-0061-8.
198. Gier, Nicholas F. (2000). Spiritual Titanism: Indian, Chinese, and Western Perspectives. Albany, NY: State
University of New York Press. pp. 59–76. ISBN 978-0-7914-4528-0.
201. Kelting, M. Whitney (2009). Heroic Wives Rituals, Stories and the Virtues of Jain Wifehood (https://books.
google.com/books?id=-txAd-dK0tEC) . Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 44–48. ISBN 978-0-19-
973679-9. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
203. Boyce, Mary (1983), "Ahura Mazdā", Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. 1, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul,
pp. 684–87
204. Andrea, Alfred; James H. Overfield (2000), The Human Record: Sources of Global History : To 1700 (http
s://books.google.com/books?id=tiz6jbjgSjEC&q=ahura+mazda&pg=PA87) , vol. 4 (Illustrated ed.),
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, p. 86, ISBN 978-0-618-04245-6, archived (https://web.archive.org/web/202108
31002212/https://books.google.com/books?id=tiz6jbjgSjEC&q=ahura+mazda&pg=PA87) from the
original on 31 August 2021, retrieved 16 October 2020
205. Bromiley, Geoffrey (1995), The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Q-Z (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=6OJvO2jMCr8C) , Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8028-3784-4, archived (https://
web.archive.org/web/20210830091414/https://books.google.com/books?id=6OJvO2jMCr8C) from the
original on 30 August 2021, retrieved 16 October 2020
206. Winiarczyk, Marek (2013). The "Sacred History" of Euhemerus of Messene (https://books.google.com/bo
oks?id=OWS8TUTWLvAC&q=Sacred+History) . Translated by Zbirohowski-Kościa, Witold. Berlin:
Walther de Gruyter. pp. 27–68. ISBN 978-3-11-029488-0. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2021083
1002219/https://books.google.com/books?id=OWS8TUTWLvAC&q=Sacred+History) from the original
on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
207. Barrett, Justin L.; Keil, Frank C. (December 1996). "Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity:
Anthropomorphism in God Concepts" (http://www.yale.edu/cogdevlab/aarticles/conceptualizingnonnatu
ralentity.pdf) (PDF). Cognitive Psychology. 31 (3): 219–47. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.397.5026 (https://citeseer
x.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.397.5026) . doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0017 (https://doi.org/1
0.1006%2Fcogp.1996.0017) . PMID 8975683 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8975683) .
S2CID 7646340 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7646340) . Archived (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20160327024245/http://www.yale.edu/cogdevlab/aarticles/conceptualizingnonnaturalentity.pd
f) (PDF) from the original on 27 March 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
208. Atran, Scott; Norensayan, Ara (2005). "Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment,
compassion, communion" (http://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~ara/Manuscripts/AtranNorenzayanBBS.pdf)
(PDF). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 27 (6): 713–70.
doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000172 (https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0140525X04000172) .
PMID 16035401 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16035401) . S2CID 1177255 (https://api.semanticsc
holar.org/CorpusID:1177255) . Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20180131185248/http://www2.p
sych.ubc.ca/~ara/Manuscripts/AtranNorenzayanBBS.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 31 January 2018.
Retrieved 24 January 2018.
209. Spiegel, Alex (30 August 2010). "Is Believing In God Evolutionarily Advantageous?" (https://www.npr.org/t
emplates/story/story.php?storyId=129528196) . NPR. National Public Radio, Inc. National Public Radio.
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20180125134546/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.ph
p?storyId=129528196) from the original on 25 January 2018. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
210. Alleyne, Richard (7 September 2009). "Humans 'evolved' to believe in God: Humans may have evolved to
believe in God and superstitions because it helps them co-ordinate group action better, scientists claim"
(https://web.archive.org/web/20090910070521/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/richard-alleyne/6
146411/Humans-evolved-to-believe-in-God.html) . The Daily Telegraph. The Daily Telegraph. Archived
from the original (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/richard-alleyne/6146411/Humans-evolved-to-b
elieve-in-God.html) on 10 September 2009.
211. Barrett, Justin L. (2012). Born Believers: The Science of Children's Religious Belief (https://books.google.
com/books?id=JVJsakBCGGQC&q=Why+did+humans+evolve+to+believe+in+deities%3F) . New York
City: Free Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-4391-9657-1. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2021083100223
7/https://books.google.com/books?id=JVJsakBCGGQC&q=Why+did+humans+evolve+to+believe+in+deit
ies%3F) from the original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
212. Guthrie, Stewart Elliot (1995). Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford University Press.
ISBN 978-0-19-506901-3.
213. Keleman, Deborah (1999). "The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children" (https://www.bu.edu/
cdl/files/2013/08/1999_Kelemen_Scope.pdf) (PDF). Cognition. 70 (3): 241–72. doi:10.1016/S0010-
0277(99)00010-4 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0010-0277%2899%2900010-4) . PMID 10384737 (http
s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10384737) . S2CID 29785222 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:
29785222) . Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20180324191533/http://www.bu.edu/cdl/files/201
3/08/1999_Kelemen_Scope.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 24 March 2018. Retrieved 25 January 2018.
215. Boyer, Pascal (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought (https://archive.or
g/details/religionexplaine00boye) . Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00695-3.
216. Rossano, Matt (2007). "Supernaturalizing Social Life: Religion and the Evolution of Human Cooperation"
(http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Faculty/mrossano/recentpubs/Supernaturalizing.pdf) (PDF).
Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.). 18 (3): 272–94. doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9002-4 (https://doi.org/10.10
07%2Fs12110-007-9002-4) . PMID 26181064 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26181064) .
S2CID 1585551 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1585551) . Archived (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20120303101304/http://www2.selu.edu/Academics/Faculty/mrossano/recentpubs/Supernaturali
zing.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2009.
Further reading
Baines, John (2001). Fecundity Figures: Egyptian Personification and the Iconology of a Genre
(Reprint ed.). Oxford: Griffith Institute. ISBN 978-0-900416-78-1.
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Deity&oldid=1126601194"
Last edited 8 days ago by Python Drink