Cells 10 00463 v2
Cells 10 00463 v2
Cells 10 00463 v2
Review
Utilisation of Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as a
Model Platform for Imaging-Navigated Biomedical Research
Lei Chen 1 , Shuncong Wang 1 , Yuanbo Feng 1 , Jinyong Zhang 2,3 , Yuqing Du 2 , Jiang Zhang 4 ,
Chantal Van Ongeval 1 , Yicheng Ni 1, * and Yue Li 2, *
1 KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; lei.chen@kuleuven.be (L.C.);
shuncong.wang@kuleuven.be (S.W.); yuanbo.feng@kuleuven.be (Y.F.);
chantal.vanongeval@uzleuven.be (C.V.O.)
2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences,
Shanghai 201318, China; 192672234@st.usst.edu.cn (J.Z.); luojy@sumhs.edu.cn (Y.D.)
3 School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science & Technology,
Shanghai 200093, China
4 Faculty of Agricultural Biotechnology and Ecotechnology, Shanghai Vocational College of Agriculture and
Forestry, Shanghai 201600, China; zhangj@shafc.edu.cn
* Correspondence: yicheng.ni@kuleuven.be (Y.N.); liy_16@sumhs.edu.cn (Y.L.)
Abstract: The fertilised chick egg and particularly its chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) have drawn
continuing interest in biomedicine and bioengineering fields, especially for research on vascular
study, cancer, drug screening and development, cell factors, stem cells, etc. This literature review sys-
temically introduces the CAM’s structural evolution, functions, vascular features and the circulation
system, and cell regulatory factors. It also presents the major and updated applications of the CAM
in assays for pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, drug efficacy and toxicology testing/screening
in preclinical pharmacological research. The time course of CAM applications for different assays
Citation: Chen, L.; Wang, S.; Feng, Y.; and their advantages and limitations are summarised. Among these applications, two aspects are
Zhang, J.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Van emphasised: (1) potential utility of the CAM for preclinical studies on vascular-disrupting agents
Ongeval, C.; Ni, Y.; Li, Y. Utilisation (VDAs), promising for anti-cancer vascular-targeted therapy, and (2) modern imaging technologies,
of Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic
including modalities and their applications for real-time visualisation, monitoring and evaluation of
Membrane as a Model Platform for
the changes in CAM vasculature as well as the interactions occurring after introducing the tested
Imaging-Navigated Biomedical
medical, pharmaceutical and biological agents into the system. The aim of this article is to help
Research. Cells 2021, 10, 463.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells1002
those working in the biomedical field to familiarise themselves with the chick embryo CAM as an
0463 alternative platform and to utilise it to design and optimise experimental settings for their specific
research topics.
Received: 25 January 2021
Accepted: 19 February 2021 Keywords: chick embryo; chorioallantoic membrane (CAM); preclinical pharmacological research;
Published: 22 February 2021 vascular disrupting agents (VDAs); imaging techniques
reduce the need for animals or eventually to replace them entirely in scientific research and
the pharmaceutical industry. Thus, fertilised eggs or chick embryos have become a good
choice.
The egg embryo is considered a good pharmaceutical testing platform with the fol-
lowing advantageous features: (1) the egg embryo is a complete creature, with necessary
organs within an isolated environment; (2) the size of the egg embryo is small and easy to
handle; (3) the egg embryo contains rich nutrients and vigorous angiogenesis capacities;
(4) eggs do not possess a complete immune system at certain stages of chick development
and are much less expensive than immune-compromised animals; and (5) eggs are less
restricted with animal welfare concerns because they are not considered animals yet.
Embryologically, during the development of fertilised eggs, an extremely rich vascular
network is generated between the double layers of the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM).
This vascular network fuses closely underneath the eggshell and connects to the embryonic
circulation via the allantoic stalk. The CAM system has been widely used in in vivo assays
for studying angiogenesis [1] and for human tumour growth and therapies [2]. Indeed,
angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis processes related to tissues, cells or soluble factors are
tested by the CAM [2]. Many substances have been reported to boost or inhibit angiogenesis
in the CAM, for instance growth factors, anti-cancer agents, pro-angiogenic molecules,
natural and synthetic molecules, antibodies, organic-metallic compounds, antibiotics,
etc. [3].
Meanwhile, the classical property of the CAM with a native vasculature already
allows testing the pharmacological effects of certain compounds in biomedical research.
Small-molecule vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) constitute a new therapy for cancer and
can selectively affect the tumour vasculature via some pathways to inhibit blood flow and
cause extensive necrosis within the tumour [3–5]. Therefore, VDAs are ideal candidates for
demonstration of the efficiency and feasibility of the CAM platform in preclinical efficacy
and toxicology testing of pharmaceuticals. To the best of our knowledge, only few studies
have been conducted in this area.
The crucial step in evaluation is to observe and monitor vascular alterations, including
angiogenesis, vascular disrupting processes following administration of tested medicines,
etc. Researchers have developed different techniques to measure and quantify these
properties in the CAM of the chick embryo. The techniques can be classified into destructive
(ex ovo) and non-destructive (in ovo) and qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative
ones [6,7].
Here, we systematically review existing CAM assays for different applications and
the available techniques for measuring and monitoring the vasculature in the CAM. Some
new imaging techniques are emphasised, which permit us to visualise the vascular struc-
ture at the microscopic level. Moreover, new techniques permit us to continuously and
dynamically visualise and record the changes in the vasculature and carry out quantified
analysis and assessment. Modern techniques and methods can save time, materials, and
labour, with reduced experimental deviations.
This review outlines the potential of the CAM platform to evaluate the pharmacologi-
cal effects of VDAs, from the most advanced imaging instrument for vasculature change
measurements.
2. CAM Assay
2.1. Development of Fertilised Chick Eggs in Incubation
The chick embryo normally experiences 21 days of development before hatching,
which corresponds to multiple stages (Figure 1). Usually, the first day of incubation is
defined as embryonic day one (ED 1) [8].
Cells 2021, 10, 463 3 of 40
ls 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 41
Figure 1. Schematic
Figure drawings
1. Schematic of chronological
drawings chick embryo
of chronological development.
chick embryo development.
Figure 2. (A) A blastoderm floating on the surface of yolk on ED 2, (B,C) magnified views of the
Figure 2. (A) A blastoderm floating on the surface of yolk on ED 2, (B,C) magnified views of the
blastoderm in development on ED 2 and (D) illustration of membranes and blood circulation sys-
blastoderm in development on ED 2 and (D) illustration of membranes and blood circulation system
tem of an embryonic chick egg in the middle stage.
of an embryonic chick egg in the middle stage.
Three extra-embryonic membranes are there to support and nourish the embryo dur-
Three extra-embryonic membranes are there to support and nourish the embryo
ing growth:
during growth: thethe
yolk sac,sac,
yolk thethe
amnion
amnion and thethe
and CAMCAM [11].
[11].
These membranes feature internal variable structures in in
These membranes feature internal variable structures eggs
eggs during
during embryo
embryo devel-
develop-
opment.
ment. TheThesize,size, morphology
morphology and position
and position of theofthree
the three membranes
membranes keep changing.
keep changing. All
All these
these changes are aimed to adapt the embryo development
changes are aimed to adapt the embryo development and physiological functions. and physiological functions.
Theextra-embryonic
The extra-embryoniccirculation
circulationhas hasbeen
beendistinguished
distinguishedfrom fromthetheintra-embryonic
intra-embryonic
circulation [9]. The vitelline circulation and the allantoic circulation are
circulation [9]. The vitelline circulation and the allantoic circulation are extra-embryonic extra-embryonic
circulations. Major
circulations. Major blood
bloodvessels
vesselsconnect
connectdifferent
differentparts
partsof the embryonic
of the embryonic circulation (Fig-
circulation
ure 2D).
(Figure 2D).
The circulating blood
The circulating blood volume
volume of of the
the embryo
embryo fromfromED ED44until
untilED
ED1818hashasbeen
beendeter-
de-
mined (Table 1) [12]. The blood volume does not show an entire
termined (Table 1) [12]. The blood volume does not show an entire perfect curve of perfect curve of exponen-
tial growth.growth.
exponential The blood Thevolume reaches reaches
blood volume a peak value
a peakbetween ED 16 and
value between ED ED16 and18 and
ED 18de-
and decreases somewhat towards the end of hatching. This volume reduction is related the
creases somewhat towards the end of hatching. This volume reduction is related to to
degeneration
the degeneration of the extra-embryonic
of the extra-embryonic circulation
circulationsystem.
system.
Maina [13] comprehensively explained how the embryo absorbs vital nutrients from
Table
the 1. Circulating
albumen and theblood
yolkvolume
to build (ml)
newin chick embryo
tissues on different
and sustain embryonic
existing organsdays (EDs).
during incuba-
tion before EDinternal pipping
4 (the
5 chick
6 pecks7 the CAM
8 and
9 the
10 shell breaks).
12 14 The 16calcium
18
Blood Volume (mL) 0.04 0.10 0.17 0.26 0.37 0.51 0.68 1.15 2.15 3.13 2.58
Cells 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 41
Cells 2021, 10, 463 Maina [13] comprehensively explained how the embryo absorbs vital nutrients 5from
of 40
the albumen and the yolk to build new tissues and sustain existing organs during incuba-
tion before internal pipping (the chick pecks the CAM and the shell breaks). The calcium
deposited in the eggshell provides the necessary source for bone formation in the chick
deposited in the eggshell provides the necessary source for bone formation in the chick
embryo.
embryo.
2.2. CAM Development and Physiological Function
Table 1. Circulating blood volume (mL) in chick embryo on different embryonic days (EDs).
The CAM is a double-layer membrane fused by the chorion and the allantois and has
an extremely
ED rich vascular 4 network.5 The
6 vascular
7 8network
9 in10the CAM
12 is14connected
16 with
18
the embryonic circulation through the allantoic stalk (Figure 3A). The CAM is responsible
Blood Volume (mL) 0.04 0.10 0.17 0.26 0.37 0.51 0.68 1.15 2.15 3.13 2.58
for embryonic respiration, protecting and nourishing the embryo during most of the chick
embryonic development.
2.2. CAM Development
The formation of and
the Physiological Function
allantois is shown in Figure 3B. The allantois of the embryo
The CAM is a double-layer membrane
emerges at about 3.5 embryonic days (ED 3.5). The fused by ventral
the chorion
walland theendodermal
of the allantois andhind
has
an extremely rich vascular network. The vascular network in the CAM is connected
gut of the embryo evaginates. This evagination pushes out a part of the embryo body into with
the embryonic circulation
extra-embryonic coelom.through the allantoic
Its proximal stalk(allantoic
portion (Figure 3A). Thelies
stalk) CAM is responsible
parallel and just
for embryonic
next respiration,
to the bottom protecting
of the yolk andwhen
sac, and nourishing the embryo
the distal portion during
extendsmost away of from
the chick
the
embryonic
embryo, development.
it grows bigger. It is named the allantoic vesicle [14].
Figure 3.chick
Figure 3. (A) A photo of a fertilised (A) Aegg
photo of a4fertilised
at day chick eggand
post-incubation at day
(B) a4 schematic
post-incubation anddisplaying
drawing (B) a schematic draw-
how the
ing displaying how the allantois is formed.
allantois is formed.
The
The allantoic
formation vesicle
of theenlarges
allantoisvery rapidlyinduring
is shown FigureEDs3B.4–10
The [14]. As shown
allantois of theinembryo
Figure
3A, a chicken
emerges embryo
at about at ED 4 forms
3.5 embryonic the(ED
days vascularised
3.5). The allantoic membrane.
ventral wall The background
of the endodermal hind
is
gutthe
ofyolk sac membrane
the embryo evaginates.(YSM),Thisalso highly vascularised
evagination pushes out[15].
a part of the embryo body into
By the end of ED
the extra-embryonic 7, mostItsofproximal
coelom. the chorion is in (allantoic
portion contact with thelies
stalk) shell membrane
parallel [16].
and just next
The process to form the CAM has been further described previously
to the bottom of the yolk sac, and when the distal portion extends away from the embryo, [9]. Through the
continuous
it grows bigger.enlargement
It is named of the
theallantoic
allantoicvesicle,
vesicle at about 100 h of incubation, the allantois
[14].
startsThe
to fuse with vesicle
allantoic the chorion, andvery
enlarges consequently,
rapidly duringthe CAM is formed.
EDs 4–10 [14]. AsThe CAMinconsists
shown Figure
of
3A,three layersembryo
a chicken (chorion, at stroma,
ED 4 formsallantoic membrane)allantoic
the vascularised and lies close to the eggshell
membrane. (Figure.
The background
4).
is the yolk sac membrane (YSM), also highly vascularised [15].
The
By the CAMendspreads
of ED 7,over mostthe yolkchorion
of the sac surface and covers
is in contact withitthe
completely between[16].
shell membrane ED 6
and EDThe7process to form
[16]. This the CAMwith
is consistent has been further described
Romanoff’s description previously
[9]: around[9]. EDs
Through
7–8, the
continuous
CAM extends enlargement
throughout ofthe
theblunt
allantoic
halfvesicle, at about
of the egg 100 h ofthe
and reaches incubation, the allantois
middle line. He con-
starts tothat
cluded fuseeventually,
with the chorion,
the CAM andcovers
consequently,
the entire theegg
CAM is formed.
around The CAM consists of
EDs 10–11.
threeAslayers (chorion,
illustrated stroma,4,allantoic
in Figure membrane) extends
the chorioallantois and lies to
close to the the
embrace eggshell (Figure
contents 4).
of the
whole The eggCAMat EDspreads over thethe
12, attaching yolk sac surface
entire surface and covers
of the innerit shell
completely
membranebetween
[17].ED
The 6
and ED 7 [16]. This is consistent with Romanoff’s description [9]:
CAM surface is 6 cm at ED 6, undergoing rapid extension, and becomes 65 cm at ED 14
2 around EDs 7–8,
2 the CAM
extends throughout the blunt half of the egg and reaches the middle line. He concluded
[18].
that eventually,
Although the theCAM
CAMbecomes
covers the entire egglarge,
increasingly around theEDs
two10–11.
extra-embryonic circulations
remain separate, but both are connected to the intra-embryonic circulation.
Coming to the end, apoptosis progresses in the CAM at ED 18, and apoptotic cells
are found in the mesenchyme [8]. Finally, during internal piping, chick lung ventilation
initiates CAM degeneration [19]. The outer and inner shell membranes interface each
other with the eggshell, the chorion epithelium and the subchorionic sinuses (Figure 5),
which brings capillary blood close to the air via the air cell [13].
Cells 2021, 10, 463
The CAM is a highly vascularised and transparent membrane [11]. Arteries, 6veins of 40
and the capillary plexus exist in the CAM [2,20]. The chorioallantoic capillary volume and
surface size increase during CAM development [18].
Figure 5. Images
Imagesillustrating
illustratingthe
thematuration
maturationofofthe CAM
the CAM vasculature.
vasculature.(A)(A)
Vascular remodelling,
Vascular remodelling,
growth and anastomosis can be seen at ED 7; (B) hierarchic vascular structures and fully differen-
growth and anastomosis can be seen at ED 7; (B) hierarchic vascular structures and fully differentiated
tiated vessels are noted on ED 10; (C) vessel tree reconstruction and flow direction for major
vessels are noted on ED 10; (C) vessel tree reconstruction and flow direction for major arterial arte-
and
rial and venous vessels (arrows); and (D) scanning electron microscope view of blood vessels
venous vessels (arrows); and (D) scanning electron microscope view of blood vessels on the CAM. on
the CAM.
Meanwhile, the allantois works as a deposit for waste products excreted by embryo
The mostly
kidneys, different stages
urea of the
at the earlyvascular development
stage and chiefly uricprocess
acid at in the CAM
a later stagepresent
[9,14]. specific
characteristics [26]. On ED 4, all vessels remain undifferentiated capillaries,
The CAM has other physiological functions: transportation of electrolytes (sodium whose walls
and
only have a single endothelial layer without a basal lamina. By ED 8,
chloride) from the allantois and calcium movement from shell to bone for mineralisation.primary vessels grow
and differentiate
Calcium movement intocan
an be
artery–venous systemcalcium-transporting
certified by typical and thus create a capillary network.
cells in These
the chorionic
small, by
cavity thin-walled
ED 12, and capillaries
the movement with arate
10–15
canμm lumenal
reach 100 nmol diameter migrate
of calcium and present
per hour per 1 cmat2
thethe
of superficial
CAM surface layer[8,14,24].
of the CAM, which is just beneath the chorionic epithelium (Figure
6).
2.3. Microcirculation
Meanwhile, as the and CAM
Morphology in the CAM
is expanding, endothelium mitosis undergoes a rapid phase
in theAcapillary network. Concurrently,
full understanding of the vascular thestructure
capillaryofendothelium in the CAM
the CAM is essential undergoes
to investigate
a sequence
the mechanismsof structural changesresponse
of the vascular [16]. A capillary
in the CAMnetwork
assaydevelops
platform.via respective angio-
genicThe
processes,
vascularincluding
system is sprouting, elongation,
the first system built upfusion
in the to theembryo
chick capillaryinplexus
order toand intus-
facilitate
susceptive growth
respiration, because[27]. The total
oxygen lengthonly
molecules of thecanCAM vessels
diffuse aboutis closely
100–200correlated with the
µm in embryonic
entire area
tissues [25].of the CAM [27].
As shown
Other in Figure
vessels located5,inthe
the CAM holds a rich
mesodermal vascular
layer network
are bigger within
generally, its mesodermal
with a 10–115 μm
layer, and and
diameter, paired
theallantoic
endothelium(umbilical) arteries
of the blood and veins
vessels supply blood
is surrounded by a to thisof
layer system [18].
mesenchy-
The different
mal cells stages of
and completely the vascular
wrapped by a development process 6).
basal lamina (Figure in the CAM present specific
characteristics [26]. On ED 4, all vessels remain undifferentiated capillaries, whose walls
only have a single endothelial layer without a basal lamina. By ED 8, primary vessels grow
and differentiate into an artery–venous system and thus create a capillary network. These
small, thin-walled capillaries with a 10–15 µm lumenal diameter migrate and present at
the superficial layer of the CAM, which is just beneath the chorionic epithelium (Figure 6).
and sprouting angiogenesis [28]. After short-term sprouting, intussusceptive growth re-
mains dominant and increases density and complexity [27]. Intussusceptive growth is the
main process from EDs 7–11, with lower endothelial cell proliferation [29], and the prolif-
eration comes down after ED 11 [30]. Within this network, parts of the vessels become
Cells 2021, 10, 463 larger and extend laterally to form arteriolar and venular trees [27] (Figure 5C). EDs8 of
10–40
12 is an important period for vascular development in the CAM. During EDs 10–12, the
capillaries become adjacent to the chorionic epithelium (Figure 6).
Figure
Figure 6. Simplified schematic 6. Simplified
diagram schematic
(A) showing diagramcomponents
the structural (A) showing
of the
the structural
CAM, which components of the
amplifies the CAM,
embedded
which amplifies the embedded microscopic view of the haematoxylin-eosin-stained slice of the
microscopic view of the haematoxylin-eosin-stained slice of the CAM (B) where the ectoderm includes the chorion epithelium
CAM (B) where the ectoderm includes the chorion epithelium and sub-chorionic capillary sinus
and sub-chorionic capillary sinus layers of the CAM, and the endoderm corresponds to the allantoic epithelium of the CAM.
layers of the CAM, and the endoderm corresponds to the allantoic epithelium of the CAM. *Larger
*Larger vessels in the mesoderm (stroma).
vessels in the mesoderm (stroma).
Meanwhile, as the CAM is expanding, endothelium mitosis undergoes a rapid phase
Now, arteries and veins are distinguished in the mesodermal vessels. For example, a
in the capillary2network. Concurrently, the capillary endothelium in the CAM undergoes
piece of 1.7 cm CAM contains two major arteries and one major vein. Diameters of the
a sequence of structural changes [16]. A capillary network develops via respective an-
two main arterioles are 261 μm and 172 μm, and the major venule diameter is 390 μm [31].
giogenic processes, including sprouting, elongation, fusion to the capillary plexus and
Arteries have walls containing one or two layers of mesenchymal cells with more connec-
intussusceptive growth [27]. The total length of the CAM vessels is closely correlated with
tive tissue area
the entire surrounding
of the CAM the [27].
endothelium, tending to develop a fibroblast-type adventitia.
VeinsOther
have vessels
walls surrounded
located in the bymesodermal
connective tissues
layer areand incomplete
bigger mesenchymal
generally, with a 10–115cells,
µm
which develop into smooth muscle cells [26]. CAM vessels
diameter, and the endothelium of the blood vessels is surrounded by a layer grow rapidly up to
ofED 11, and
mesenchy-
then the endothelial
mal cells cell mitosis
and completely wrapped dramatically reduces(Figure
by a basal lamina and stays6). at a minimal growth rate
[26]. The
The capillary
density and fractal
plexus dimension
is formed of the vascular
and develops quickly network
from EDsincrease steadily from
4–5 by vasculogenesis
EDs 6 to 14 and stop at ED 15, for both complexity and branching
and sprouting angiogenesis [28]. After short-term sprouting, intussusceptive growth patterns [32,33].
The dominant
remains successiveanddevelopment of the CAM
increases density has been studied
and complexity [31]. At ED 14, growth
[27]. Intussusceptive the capil-
is
lary
the main process from EDs 7–11, with lower endothelial cell proliferation [29],the
plexus invades and is located at the surface of the ectoderm underneath andshell
the
membrane.
proliferationThe larger
comes down vessels
after in
EDthe11 mesoderm
[30]. Withincanthisfloat freelyparts
network, and move with the
of the vessels spon-
become
taneous
larger and movement of the embryo
extend laterally [16], whereas
to form arteriolar the capillary
and venular trees plexus is embedded
[27] (Figure 5C). EDs in the
10–12
most
is an superficial
important layer
period of for
the vascular
CAM [15], as illustratedininthe
development Figure
CAM.6. During EDs 10–12, the
The CAM
capillaries microcirculation
become adjacent to the is chorionic
supplied by two primary
epithelium arteries
(Figure 6). and drained by a sin-
gle vein.
Now, arteries and veins are distinguished in the mesodermalpre-
These primary vessels connect several vessels from the and post-capillaries
vessels. For example, a
of next 2
generations [18]. The left and right allantoic arteries
piece of 1.7 cm CAM contains two major arteries and one major vein. Diametersand vein remain apart during
of the
two main arterioles are 261 µm and 172 µm, and the major venule diameter is 390 µm [31].
Arteries have walls containing one or two layers of mesenchymal cells with more connective
tissue surrounding the endothelium, tending to develop a fibroblast-type adventitia. Veins
have walls surrounded by connective tissues and incomplete mesenchymal cells, which
develop into smooth muscle cells [26]. CAM vessels grow rapidly up to ED 11, and then
the endothelial cell mitosis dramatically reduces and stays at a minimal growth rate [26].
The density and fractal dimension of the vascular network increase steadily from EDs 6 to
14 and stop at ED 15, for both complexity and branching patterns [32,33].
Cells 2021, 10, 463 9 of 40
The successive development of the CAM has been studied [31]. At ED 14, the capillary
plexus invades and is located at the surface of the ectoderm underneath the shell membrane.
The larger vessels in the mesoderm can float freely and move with the spontaneous
movement of the embryo [16], whereas the capillary plexus is embedded in the most
superficial layer of the CAM [15], as illustrated in Figure 6.
The CAM microcirculation is supplied by two primary arteries and drained by a single
vein. These primary vessels connect several vessels from the pre- and post-capillaries of
next generations [18]. The left and right allantoic arteries and vein remain apart during
the fast growth of the CAM [31]. The interspace of major vessels allows inter-digitating
arteriolar and venular trees to grow and let relatively few vessels cross.
In the assay platform to test the response of blood vessels, these large and primary
vessels are the best target to be measured and evaluated in quantification by modern
imaging techniques (medical and bioengineering).
Now that the expansion of the CAM vasculature network is well established, branch-
ing patterns and microcirculation of pre- and post-capillaries of the CAM will be studied.
The morphology and mechanism of such microcirculation are described in detail. The CAM
consists of a superficial 2D network of very dense capillaries, named the capillary plexus,
shown by scanning electron microscopy in Figure 7 as a mesh morphology [34]. The cap-
illary mesh wraps a surrounding 3D space. The spatial configuration consists of two
horizontal planes, which are connected by pre-capillary bridging vessels. These bridg-
ing vessels rise in an oblique-to-vertical direction towards the superficial capillary plane.
Cells 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 41
The medium and large arterial and venous vessels, which supply and drain the superficial
layer, are located within this 3D space [16].
system. The small sinus is formed by the confluence of capillaries at the beginning of
the post-capillary venules. The blood from the arterial tree streams into the superficial
capillary mesh and then drains into the venous system. It is possible to distinguish the
arterial and the venous blood in the circulatory system of the CAM by a smooth muscle
layer surrounding the endothelium of the arterioles, but not that of the venules. Thus
their morphology is different [16]. Another important conclusion is that blood vessels in
the CAM have no terminal vessels, tips or sprouts and are always exhibited as a closed
cycle [34].
More recently, morphology studies about microcirculation in the CAM have been
deepened to discover how arterial and venous vessel trees integrate (connect) and commu-
nicate with the capillary bed [31,35]. These are described on a smaller scale by scanning
electron microscopy [31]. The interdigitating pattern derives from arterial and venous
vessel trees, and long arterial pathways link with short venous pathways through the capil-
lary mesh, and vice versa. A distinct feature is the presence of new connections between
arteriole and venule trees, which feed and drain the underlying plexus not only at their
termini but also along proximal segments of the vessel tree.
Growth
Description Functions Ref.
Factors
To exert vascular permeability
Vascular endothelial growth
VEGF and endothelial cell [37]
factor
recruitment
FGF Fibroblast growth factor To elicit fibrocyte proliferation [11,39,40]
PDGF Platelet-derived growth factor To stimulate vascular stability [38]
To act on endothelial sprouting,
ANG Angiopoietin vessel wall remodelling and [37]
mural cell recruitment
As a cytokine to stimulate
HGF Hepatocyte growth factor proliferation and [37]
morphogenesis of epithelia
To induce expression of VEGF
HIF Hypoxia-inducible factor [14,37]
and its receptors
A proteolytic fragment of
To act as an endogenous
Endostain collagen XVIII (a component of [37]
anti-angiogenic molecule
the basement membrane)
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a leading role among these factors
and is crucial for the angiogenic expansion at the early stage of CAM development. An
endogenous VEGF-A presents two peaks at EDs 8–9 and 11–12 [40].
VEGF is the prime factor to attract migrating endothelial cells and stabilise vessels
by bounding substrates during the formation of vascular tubes [36]. Some researchers
believe that VEGF causes vascular permeability, recruits endothelial cells and inhibits
vessel stabilisation. The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family is the most potent cytokine
to stimulate mitogenesis of multiple cell types, such as endothelial cells, osteoblasts, bone
marrow stromal cells, mesenchymal stem cells and immune cells. It directly causes fibroge-
nesis [37]. At present, there is a general consensus that VEGF and FGF are main factors for
the vascular growth regulation in the chick CAM.
Cells 2021, 10, 463 11 of 40
FGF-1 and FGF-2 are major prototypic members of the FGF family. Both of them
initiate activation immediately after binding to their cell surface receptor, which is named
fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (FGFR1), one of the receptor tyrosine kinases. FGF-1
is considered as a standard angiogenesis stimulator [39]. Endogenous FGF-2 may affect
the proliferation, movement, redistribution and invasion of endothelial cells [11]. FGF-2
becomes detectable in the CAM since ED 6, and maximal concentrations occur between ED
10 and ED 14. Meanwhile, FGF located in the CAM can regulate angiogenesis [38].
However, VEGF and FGF are not sufficient to finish angiogenesis, because they
function not only as promoters of endothelial cell proliferation but also as inhibitors of
vessel maturation. Through suppressing receptors on smooth muscle cells, VEGF inhibits
pericyte coverage of vascular sprouts and renders existing vessels unstable, whereas
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) creates vascular stability at the maturation stage
(late stage) of angiogenesis [37].
PDGF drives pericytes and smooth muscle cells to recruit, which form a layer of cells
around new capillaries, embed the endothelial lining and facilitate binding strongly to
the extracellular matrix. These are necessary conditions to stabilise new blood vessels.
Meanwhile, PDGF is functional to inhibit the recruitment of endothelial cells.
These facts show that a single factor is not sufficient to create a stable mature vascula-
ture. However, the coordination and balance of multiple factors can induce a successful
angiogenic response and mature vessel network in the CAM.
Not many concrete studies have been carried out on angiopoietins (ANGs). ANGs
play an important role in endothelial sprouting, mural cell recruiting and vessel wall
remodelling [36]. Angiopoietin-1 (ANG-1), a 498-amino-acid glycoprotein, is a ligand
of the endothelium-specific receptor Tie2 [41]. It recruits periendothelial cells, at the
late stage of vascular maturation, in the presence of VEGF. Unlike VEGF, ANG-1 has no
mitogenic effect in vivo [42]. However, another report indicated that ANG-2 can induce
rapid initiation of blood vessels [37].
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a specific growth factor for the liver, shows the
highest expression at the beginning of chick embryo development. Meanwhile, HGF is a
cytokine which stimulates the proliferation and morphogenesis of epithelia [36]. HGF can
also directly act on endothelial cells, including stimulation of proliferation, cell mobility,
protease production and organisation of capillary-like tubes [43].
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha and 2-alpha (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) are activated by a
hypoxic environment. HIF may switch on the expression of angiogenic genes, for example
VEGF, which attract branching vessels to stretch towards hypoxic tissues [36,44]. A high
expression level of HIF-1α correlates with a peak in the angiogenic process in the CAM [14].
Among anti-angiogenic molecules, endostatin, a proteolytic fragment of collagen
XVIII (a component of the basement membrane), inhibits endothelial cell survival and mi-
gration. During angiogenesis in the CAM, endostatin progressively elevates its expression;
meanwhile, most pro-angiogenic factors show a steadily downgrading expression [36].
In addition to these endocrine and paracrine molecules and growth factors mentioned
above, the extracellular matrix of the CAM may modify its composition and express
fibronectin, collagen type IV, laminin and specific glycosaminoglycans. These substances
can assist the angiogenesis occurring in the matrix [14].
Recently, scientists have started to reveal cellular functional mechanisms and path-
ways of growth factors in CAM angiogenesis, for example EGFR, Ties receptor and
AKT/PKB signalling and Ras-MEK-MAPK, AKT, P38 and PKC pathways [11,37].
Besides molecular regulation on endothelial cells, effects of some molecules on per-
icytes and the basement membrane in the CAM have also been studied. Netrin-4 is a
laminin-disrupting molecule. Through disturbing the laminin network, it disrupts the
full basement membranes surrounding pericytes, which are resultantly detached from the
endothelium, leading to the collapse of the capillary network. Thus, netrin-4 treatment se-
riously impacts CAM angiogenesis and reduces the vascular area by altering the basement
membrane and pericytes [45].
Cells 2021, 10, 463 12 of 40
scribed previously [24,48]. After intravascular injection of a photosensitiser into the CAM,
time-dependent fluorescence angiography is performed under a fluorescence microscope.
The extent of fluorescence inside and outside blood vessels can be analysed by these
fluorescent photographs and recorded in a semi-quantitative way. Then, by calculating
the photographic contrast, the extent of the photosensitiser diffused through the CAM
vasculature is determined and the profiles of photosensitiser pharmacokinetics can be
outlined.
Improved methodologies have been adopted to visualise vascular changes induced
by tumours and to study tumour invasion. A metastatic human melanoma cell line (C8161)
and a prostate cancer cell line (PC3) were labelled with green fluorescent protein and
implanted onto the CAM. At different time points of tumour cell growth, lens culinaris ag-
glutinin as a fluorescently tagged lectin was injected intravenously to label endothelial cells.
Through fluorescent endothelial cells, microvessels were imaged and measured by confocal
microscopy to evaluate angiogenesis. Furthermore, tumour cells grown on the CAM sur-
face and invaded into the CAM endoderm could also be imaged and evaluated by confocal
microscopy. Confocal z-stack imaging is a useful tool to analyse tumour invasion [56]. In
another research, lens culinaris agglutinin labelled with rhodamine was injected into the
blood circulation of the CAM to visualise and evaluate the microvasculature by confocal
microscopy [57].
On the other hand, with biosensors, the concentration of a drug can be determined
through conversion of a biological response into an electrical signal [58]. For instance, an
acetaminophen sensor was topically applied and integrated into the CAM of an embryo
for 7 days. Afterwards, blood levels of acetaminophen were determined with the biosensor,
which reflected the changes in acetaminophen levels [59]. A biosensor was also used to
measure the glucose concentration through non-invasive methods in a CAM model [60].
3.2. Biocompatibility
The CAM has been utilised as a model assay to study and evaluate allogenic and xeno-
geneic transplantations of different tissues and organs. As the earliest explorer, Murphy
transplanted multiple chicken tissues onto the CAM, including the spleen, liver, kidney,
bone marrow, etc., most of which survived after homologous grafting [61].
The CAM was also successfully transplanted with more allogenic tissues, including
the liver [62], mesonephros [63], adrenal gland and cerebellum [64]. In addition, the CAM
has been extensively used for xenogeneic transplantations of human bone [65], kidney [66],
endometrium [67], skin [68], ovaries [69], etc. An uncompleted immune system of the chick
embryo before ED 15 is the main reason for the successful results in these procedures.
In the CAM, these transplanted tissues can survive and grow by vascular anastomoses
between the transplanted tissue and the original CAM and most commonly by neoangio-
genesis from the CAM into implanted tissues [70]. The graft and the CAM are connected
by relatively large arteries or veins; thereby, the CAM can provide grafts with nutrients
and growth factors [63].
Cells 2021, 10, 463 14 of 40
Biocompatibility is essential for tissue engineering. In recent years, the CAM has been
used in innovative stem cell research. Extracellular matrices or synthetic polymers are
made with desired tissue-like structures and transplanted onto the CAM without rejection,
wherein cell growth, differentiation and angiogenesis can occur.
Using CAM or chick embryo to study biocompatible materials and stem cell inte-
gration has become a new future trend [15]. The angiogenic response has been tested
in implanted extracellular matrices extracted from the skin, brain, oesophagus, larynx,
trachea, aorta, diaphragm and cartilage, etc. These biomaterials acquire effective vascular
supplies with enough oxygen and other nutrients to sustain their biocompatibility and
availability [14].
More recently, fabricated synthetic polymers have been evaluated for angiogenesis.
Biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLA/PLGA) scaffolds em-
bedded in the CAM were used to sequentially deliver VEGF, FGF-2 and PDGF with distinct
kinetics in order to observe angiogenic differentiation [37]. Other biomaterials such as
fibrin matrices [71], collagen matrices [72], etc., have also been used for similar purposes.
In view of the drawbacks with VEGF, such as time-consuming or complex steps
and leaky or haemorrhagic vessels, new substances were explored to substitute VEGF, of
which 2-deoxy-D-ribose (2dDR) and 17β-Estradiol (E2) were selected as two leads. An ex
ovo CAM model was used to evaluate the angiogenic activity of the two agents, which
were gradually released from tissue engineering scaffolds. Both 2dDR and E2 induced
angiogenesis during 7 days and were approximately 80% as effective as VEGF. Based
on dose-dependent angiogenic responses, the most effective doses of both agents were
determined [57].
When non-biological materials are introduced, inflammation and ulceration could
be responding problems. The trend of tissue engineering materials is to achieve biocom-
patibility without inflammation and to control the kinetic release of growth factors [71].
Tissue transplantation studies have also built a good basis for tumour transplantation and
relevant therapies.
Table 3. Cont.
Rather than placing agents on the surface of the CAM, some methods directly injecte
cell suspensions or fluid substances into the allantoic vesicle so that their activity over the
vascular system is uniform [86].
Growth factors of different formulations such as VEGF121, VEGF165 and FGF en-
trapped in fibrin matrices have been screened on a CAM platform for their efficacy in
angiogenesis [71,87]. It is found that a single delivery of each of these factors resulted
in angiogenic activity, but the new vasculature was leaky and haemorrhagic in the fibrin
matrices. However, combined delivery of these factors or immobilising either VEGF 121 or
VEGF 165 can form non-leaky vessels with a normal morphology without haemorrhages
but with barrier function. These vessels look more mature than those produced as a re-
sponse to any single growth factor. In addition, VEGF alone can initiate the formation of
structurally intact vessels, provided it is released slowly in a low sustained dose [87].
Direct Indirect
Targeting EGF-receptor tyrosine kinase
Angiostatin, bevacizumab (Avastin) Sunitinib
Arresten, canstatin, combrestatin Targeting the VEGF receptor
Endostatin, thrombospondin Targeting the PDGF receptor
Tumstatin, methoxyestradiol, vitaxin Targeting Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 (ERBB-2)
Targeting the interferon alpha receptor *
* Interferon alpha can be considered both a direct angiogenesis inhibitor because it inhibits endothelial migration
and an indirect angiogenesis inhibitor because it inhibits synthesis of FGF by tumour cells [57,89].
vascular changes through ED 9. Comparing images at EDs 7 and 9 showed that Avastin
strongly inhibited angiogenesis in the CAM [52] and caused an increment of over 32%
of the mean avascular surface as compared to the control group. Avastin also caused a
significant reduction in the capillary density at the tested CAM site [52].
The yolk sac membrane (YSM) was also used to substitute the CAM to test Avastin.
After Avastin treatment, the number of quaternary blood vessels in both the YSM and
the CAM significantly decreased, which validated pilot screening for anti-angiogenic
agents [88].
Sunitinib is an inhibitor for multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and can work excellently
to inhibit angiogenesis. It can be used as a negative control for angiogenic responses
compared with tested agents and a positive control (VEGF) in the CAM [57].
Another good example is paclitaxel, an anti-cancer drug with anti-angiogenic property.
The efficacy of several formulations of paclitaxel was analysed on a CAM model [24].
Paclitaxel was incorporated into microspheres made from either poly(ε-caprolactone)
(PCL) or Poly lactic acid-ethylene-vinyl acetate (PLA-EVA) copolymer. By using PLA-EVA
microspheres, the paclitaxel dose was about eight times smaller than the dose used for
PCL microspheres in order to induce the same level of vascular occlusion. These results
demonstrated that the CAM model can compare the performance of drugs with different
carriers. Some formulations were tested to adjust the release rate of paclitaxel in a CAM
assay where methoxypoly ethyleneglycol (MePEG), PCL, lipospheres and gelatine were
applied to validate its pharmacokinetics [24].
Other innovative anti-angiogenic agents have also been explored on the CAM for
photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiotherapy. PDT is to combine photosensitisers (anti-
angiogenic compounds) with various activating light sources to suppress vascular growth,
whereas radiotherapy increases the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic treatment when X-rays
are combined with radio-sensitisers [91,92].
volume fraction was also compared. The in silico model made sprouting angiogenesis
more predictable and the combination with the in vivo assay more valuable [97].
Since the CAM is an isolated subject without external excretion, the metabolic half-life
of many molecules, such as small peptides, tends to be much longer in the chick embryo
Cells 2021, 10, 463 19 of 40
3.4.2. Toxicity
The adverse effects on various organs, damage to the vasculature and even embryo
death can be evaluated as indexes for the toxicities of tested drugs or carriers on the
CAM [14]. Here are a few examples.
The influence and toxicity of cigarette smoke and nicotine were investigated in an
ex ovo chick embryo culture [121]. Shell-less chick embryo cultures were used to assess
the effects of acute glucose toxicity [122]. The toxicity of certain herbal medicines such
as Angelica sinensis injection (ASI) and Astragalus membranaceus injection (AMI) was
explored on a CAM platform [123]. Control, ASI, AMI and different ratios of ASI and
AMI were applied topically on the CAM via the drug carrier. After treatment, the number
of living chick embryos was counted. Results showed that ASI and AMI did not inhibit
the survival of chick embryos, and it was concluded that ASI and AMI could be further
investigated for clinical applications in angiogenesis modulation.
As an advanced anti-cancer therapy, the combination of a drug and a carrier can
be assessed. Biodegradable periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMO) nanoparticles were
developed, and doxorubicin (anti-cancer drug) was loaded inside. Human ovarian cancer
cells were planted on the CAM to induce rapid tumour formation. The efficacy and toxicity
of the drug were evaluated after nanoparticles were injected intravenously into the embryo.
The tumour underwent elimination, and no significant damage to various organs (heart,
liver, spleen, kidney, lung and intestine) occurred in the embryo. Toxic effects of the
drug-loaded nanoparticles were obviously missing. In contrast, when doxorubicin without
nanoparticles was injected directly, widespread organ damage was observed, even when a
low concentration was administered [53]. These results sugges that the CAM is a valuable
tumour platform to screen the toxicity and side effects of novel drugs and therapies.
ity and side effects of vascular-targeting drugs and substances must be first screened at
preclinical research levels.
Vascular-targeting strategies
Vascular-targeting therapies (VTTs) include two different approaches: the anti-angiogenic
approach and the vascular-disrupting approach [116]. Accordingly, there are two distinct
categories of agents: anti-angiogenic agents (AAs) and vascular-disrupting agents (VDAs).
AAs suppress the growth of the new tumour vasculature through the inhibition of vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other pro-angiogenic molecules [3,124], whereas
VDAs act on endothelial cells and pericytes of the existent tumoral vasculature and conse-
quently vessel occlusion, shutdown of the circulation and pervasive necrosis are induced
inside the tumour [3,125].
Vascular-disrupting agents
VDAs are a type of novel vascular-targeting agents used to treat solid cancers. VDAs
can selectively act on the tumour vasculature by several pathways by which blood flow
inhibition and extensive secondary necrosis occur within tumours, while having little
effect on non-malignant tissues (which remain relatively intact). Tumour blood vessels are
abnormal in structure and function, which are fundamentally different from the vascular
networks of normal tissues, and thus selectively targeted by VDAs [3,125,126].
Classification and mechanisms of VDAs
Currently, two types of VDAs exist in preclinical and clinical R&D, small molecules
and ligand-directed VDAs. Small-molecule VDAs are in the advanced stage of clinical
trials, which can be further divided into two categories: tubulin-binding agents and
flavonoids [125] with distinct mechanisms of action.
A. Tubulin-binding agents
Tubulin-binding agents act directly at the endothelial cytoskeleton, bind to the colchicine-
binding site of the β-subunit of endothelial tubulin, initiate microtubule depolymerisation
and actin/tubulin disorganisation, disrupt endothelial conjunctions and cause cytoskele-
ton deformation and dysfunction. As a result (Figure 8), endothelial cells round up and
bleb on the surface, leading to increased vascular resistance, blood flow stasis, blood cell
stacking, leaky vasculature and intra-tumoral vessel occlusion, followed by coagulation
cascade, thrombus formation, cell–cell disconnection and exposure of the already abnormal
basement membrane. Ultimately, massive ischaemic and haemorrhagic tumour necrosis
occurs [3,126,127].
It must be emphasised that (1) such VDA-induced cytoskeletal disruption occurs
selectively in immature endothelial cells with a lack of contact with smooth muscle and
pericytes, instead of vessels in normal tissues, and (2) such VDA-induced tumour necrosis
is always incomplete, leaving viable cancer cells behind for tumour recurrence [3], which
presents a bottleneck problem with VDAs and calls for a smart solution [49].
Representative tubulin-binding agents are stilbenes of the combretastatin family and
heterocyclic compounds, including combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P), a combretastatin
A-1 derivative OXi4503 and a serine-linked amino derivative AVE8062 [127], as listed in
Table 6.
icytes, instead of vessels in normal tissues, and (2) such VDA-induced tumour necrosis is
always incomplete, leaving viable cancer cells behind for tumour recurrence [3], which
presents a bottleneck problem with VDAs and calls for a smart solution [49].
Representative tubulin-binding agents are stilbenes of the combretastatin family and
Cells 2021, 10, 463 heterocyclic compounds, including combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P), a 21com- of 40
bretastatin A-1 derivative OXi4503 and a serine-linked amino derivative AVE8062 [127],
as listed in Table 6.
Table 6. Cont.
B. Flavonoids
ASA404 or DMXAA (an analogue of flavone acetic acid) is an example of this class (Ta-
ble 6). Flavonoids have a mechanism which is tubulin independent but induces both direct
and indirect anti-vascular action. The direct action leads to rapid apoptosis of endothelial
cells, probably due to the induction of tumour necrosis factor-α and the recruitment of
activated neutrophils, whereas the indirect action stimulates the production of cytokines,
for example tumour necrosis factor-α and other cytokines and chemokines, resulting in
ischaemic tumour necrosis [3,126].
VDAs under research and clinical development
Several small-molecule VDAs have been assessed for cancer treatment. However, the
development many VDAs was terminated because of their unsatisfactory efficacy or their
toxicity and side effects (Table 6).
Combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P) is a most extensively studied VDA in clinical
trials for various tumour types, alone or in combination therapy. Thus, CA4P is chosen to
demonstrate the features, efficacy and safety of VDA treatment.
Many trails on a single use of CA4P in human patients have been performed. CA4P
causes an acute and serious shutdown of blood vessels and nearly overall stopping of
blood flow in the tumour and ultimately leads to selective tumour necrosis. However, such
impacts are not present in normal tissues. Meanwhile, CA4P is safe and well tolerated and
lacks haematologic toxicity, which is verified by studies under different dosing schedules
(weekly, 3-weekly, and daily for 5 days every 3 weeks). A maximum-tolerated dose
(MTD) of 50–60mg/m2 was set with consistent anti-vascular effects [125]. Through several
preclinical studies on dose–time correlations of CA4P treatment in tumours and normal
tissues, an estimated dose of 10 mg/kg of CA4P was set as the MTD for rats, equivalent to
that for humans [138].
It must be noted that CA4P, list other VDAs, can cause considerable tumour necrosis,
but tumour regrowth is attributed to peripheral sparing cancer cells (the viable rim) which
are supplied with nutrients and oxygen by the surrounding normal vasculature. Rapid re-
growth of tumours can ensue when a single VDA is administered [125,138]. It is a common
drawback of VDAs, which needs to be tackled [49]. These facts indicate a direction: VDA
combination therapies, for example CA4P plus chemotherapy, CA4P plus AAs, CA4P plus
AAs and chemotherapy, CA4P plus radiology, etc.
Combined with chemotherapy, CA4P showed promising results in clinical trials [3].
A safety and efficacy evaluation was carried out for CA4P with paclitaxel/carboplatin in
anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. The results showed that one-year survival for chemother-
apy/CA4P versus chemotherapy alone was 26% versus 9%, respectively. In addition, no
significant cardiovascular side effects arose and the therapy was well tolerated. Thus,
CA4P with carboplatin/paclitaxel can be a prospective therapy for anaplastic thyroid
carcinoma [139].
Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer underwent a phase II trial with CA4P
in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. CA4P with paclitaxel and carboplatin
caused a higher response rate in patients than sole chemotherapy without CA4P and was
well tolerated [140].
Cells 2021, 10, 463 23 of 40
These studies have just been reported with preliminary evaluation of the vascular
responses towards VDAs. Testing methods are simple with VDAs applied topically on the
surface of the CAM to observe visual changes in vessels and their branches and to count the
number of blood vessel branches by photography [130] and even manual counting [144].
There have not been any more precise quantitative analyses of the vascular response to
VDAs, with a lack of analyses on efficacy and safety.
pancreatic cancer cells were treated with gemcitabine or crizotinib or their combination,
topically applied daily from ED 10 until ED 18 on the CAM [146].
Other researchers prefer ED 9 as the optimal time to inject drugs intravenously into
the CAM to test drug formulations, since major blood vessels are mature at this time [147].
We believe this period can be expanded until ED 10.
4. Methods to Image and Evaluate the Changes in the Vasculature of the CAM
Advanced imaging techniques have enabled us to inspect and quantify the number,
spacing and growth of blood vessels on the CAM, analyse their structural and functional
normalities or abnormalities, measure blood flow and vascularity and facilitate the assess-
ment of vascular-targeting drugs in laboratory or preclinical assays [157].
The CAM is one of the most broadly used assays for vascular-related research [1].
Therefore, various imaging and evaluating techniques have been developed for deter-
mining the angiogenesis and vascular changes induced by different factors or substances
applied on the CAM.
The most conventional methods are destructive: the vasculature of the excised CAM
is observed through a microscope or camera; another approach is morphometric analysis
of the blood vessel network based on stereology [158]. Under such conditions, the CAM is
not intact, not in vivo, and the chick embryo is not vital.
Non-destructive techniques have been developed to provide versatile images of the
CAM vasculature. These can be divided into X-ray, magnetic resonance, gamma-rays and
acoustic and optical techniques, supplemented most recently by artificial intelligence (AI).
Those modalities can, respectively, measure structural changes in the vascular system, the
number and diameter of blood vessels and certain functional parameters, for example
blood flow, dynamics and blood oxygen levels [44,157].
Innovative methods for imaging the vasculature can visualise blood vessels in tumours
grafted on the CAM in order to assess the efficacy of vascular-targeting drugs for treatment
of cancer or other chronic diseases.
vessels, which enable one to visualise selectively specific vasculature at the microscopic
level.
By microscopic methods, the simplest evaluation is to observe the presence or absence
of blood vessels and their changes with parameters such as the number or density of blood
vessels; vessel dimensions, including length, diameter and branch points; and the total area
of the CAM [44,73,157]. Vascular changes can be determined by using stereological princi-
ples and morphometric analysis. Qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative skills are
available, among which automated image analysis and statistical post-processing methods
are valuable tools incorporating appropriate computer software [44,157,159]. A ×10 mag-
nification stereomicroscope was utilised to analyse the vascular convergence towards the
graft, distribution, branching and density of CAM vessels at different time points. A ×250
magnification microscope was used to quantitatively evaluate microvessel density, which is
expressed as the percentage of intersectional points occupied by microvessels [159].
Different tumour cells were inoculated into the CAM. Macrovessel images next to
the graft were taken by a handy digital camera at ED s10, 12 and 14, and the images were
processed to quantify angiogenesis. In parallel, microvessels were evaluated by confocal
microscopy, which focused on the capillary plexus adjacent to the surface of the CAM [56].
A fluorescent microscope was also used to visualise expansion of the metastasis in
the CAM. The human epidermoid carcinoma cell line was injected intravenously, and a
fluorescent stereomicroscope imaged a section of the CAM at different intervals over days.
Contrasting the dark-green background from the eggshell, the tumour cells were visible as
bright-green spots and the vessels were visible as black lines [160].
One set of intravital microscopy was designed to image blood vessels which grew
or regressed in the CAM and to inspect neovascularisation in tumour grafts in the ex
ovo chick embryo [161]. It could catch real-time images for over 72 h and quantify the
angiogenesis progress, without affecting the host and tumour systems. This designed
unit was integrated with an upright epifluorescence or spinning disk confocal microscope.
Fluorescent nanoparticles or dyes were used to enable visualisation of blood vessels.
Such intravital microscopy can collect 3D spatial and temporal data. Rapid successive
fluorescence images can be acquired in a single plane to visualise the dynamics of blood
flow. The detailed structure at specific time points can be analysed by a 3D image stack
at high resolution. Vasculature changes over time can be figured out by acquiring 3D
stacks. Meanwhile, intravital microscopic imaging could display several unusual features
of tumour vessels in preclinical applications [157].
The microscopic methods provide the highest resolution; confocal microscopy has
about 100 nm resolution, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) yields a few nanometres,
which is only restricted for ex vivo studies [157,161].
Unlike X-ray- and gamma-ray-based imaging modalities, which emit ionising radia-
tion harmful to organisms, including animals and humans, MRI is virtually harmless to
Cells 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW life and therefore can be applied to monitor the growth of chick embryos longitudinally
29 of or
41
on any ED (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Using a clinical 3.0T Siemens magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, a chick embryo
Figure 9. Using a clinical 3.0T Siemens magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, a chick embryo on ED 12 can be imaged
on ED 12 can be imaged entirely at both axial and coronal slices of 3 mm thickness with both T1
entirely at both axial and coronal slices of 3 mm thickness with both T1 and T2 weighted sequences, reflecting different
and T2 weighted sequences, reflecting different physiochemical properties of the tissue compo-
physiochemical properties of the tissue components.
nents.
4.4.
4.4. Gamma-Ray
Gamma-Ray Methods
Methods
Positron emission tomography
Positron emission tomography (PET)
(PET) is aisnewa new approach
approach utilising
utilising positron positron
and gammaand
gamma rays. A positron-emitting
rays. A positron-emitting radiotracer
radiotracer is intravenously
is intravenously administered,
administered, and its dis-
and its distribution
tribution is monitored
is monitored during a during
suitablea uptake
suitableperiod.
uptakeWhileperiod. While decaying,
decaying, the radionuclide
the radionuclide emits a
emits a positron, which interacts with an electron in the environment,
positron, which interacts with an electron in the environment, inducing the emission inducing the emis-of
sion of two gamma rays in opposite directions. These emissions
two gamma rays in opposite directions. These emissions can be detected by two detectors can be detected by two
detectors
on opposite on sides
opposite
of thesides
objectof the object [163].
[163].
For
For aanormal
normaltissue
tissuestudy,
study,PETPET can
canmeasure
measure thetheblood volume
blood volumeby the
by signal but can-
the signal but
not actually
cannot visualise
actually visualisevascular
vascular structures
structures [157].
[157].ForForcancer
cancerstudies,
studies, tumour
tumour functional
characteristics
characteristics such
such asas blood
blood flow or volume and glucose metabolism can be accurately
quantified by the application of radiotracers, e.g., 15 H2 O, 11CO
15H2O, 11
COand and1818
FDGFDG [163].
[163].
Tumour glucose metabolism and protein synthesis were successfully imaged by PET
in a U87 glioblastoma model on the CAM. The injection injection of of 18
18FDG into blood vessels of the
in individual tumours was verified [172]. The accuracy of tumour volume measurements
can be improved by by CTCT imaging.
imaging. Therefore,
Therefore,aacombination
combinationofofPET PETand andX-ray
X-rayCT CTbecomes
becomes a
standard approach to ensure and elevate the accuracy of imaging,
a standard approach to ensure and elevate the accuracy of imaging, which yields func- which yields functional
data with
tional dataanatomic information.
with anatomic In addition,
information. the novel
In addition, theapplication of PET/CT
novel application was tested
of PET/CT was
on theon
tested CAM to screen
the CAM novel
to screen PETPET
novel tracers [172].
tracers [172].AA CAM
CAMtumourtumourmodel
modelis is particularly
valuable for
valuable forrapid
rapidandandhigh-throughput
high-throughputscreening screening of of novel
novel radiotracers,
radiotracers, as well
as well as op-
as for for
optimisation
timisation of PET/CT
of PET/CT imaging
imaging protocols
protocols [153].
[153].
4.5. Acoustic
4.5. Acoustic Methods
Methods
Ultrasonography refers
Ultrasonography refers an
an ordinary
ordinary and
and widely
widely available imaging modality
available imaging modality in
in both
both
clinical and preclinical research. It is suitable to visualise tumour growth and vascularisa-
clinical and preclinical research. It is suitable to visualise tumour growth and vascularisa-
tion in the CAM assay. By using a commercial ultrasonographic scanner, tumour growth
tion in the CAM assay. By using a commercial ultrasonographic scanner, tumour growth
and angiogenesis were successfully monitored, and results of ultrasound images were
and angiogenesis were successfully monitored, and results of ultrasound images were
significantly correlated with those of histological analysis from the excised tumour [155].
significantly correlated with those of histological analysis from the excised tumour [155].
Photoacoustics is based on the generation of sound waves by laser radiation. A short
laser pulse heats absorbers inside the tissue, with the temperature raised by generated
energy. Due to up-and-down changes in the temperature, the absorber expands and sub-
sequently contracts, inducing a pressure wave or an acoustic wave. These time-trace
waves disperse through the tissue and can be seized by the detector at the tissue surface.
Cells 2021, 10, 463 29 of 40
ODT velocity images, blood moving at different velocities appears distinctive in contrast to
dark static regions in the CAM. The blood flow velocity is maximum at the vessel centre,
decreasing gradually towards the vessel wall, with a velocity resolution of 100 µm/s.
The ODT probes into tissues to a depth of about 1–2 mm.
A Doppler variance optical coherence tomography (DVOCT) method was developed
to apply to tumour vasculature imaging. A glioma F98 tumour spheroid was tested on
the CAM, and 3D mapping of the tumour was carried out. Both the microstructure and
the microvasculature of the tumour were visualised clearly. A dense vascular network
of capillaries up to 10 µm in diameter was visualised from the top view of the DVOCT
image with a spatial resolution of 3.5 µm and an average penetration depth of 1.5 mm. As
a real-time imaging system, DVOCT has the potential to assess tumour vasculature as a
non-invasive technique in clinical and preclinical settings [177].
More recently, the impact of the optical properties of scatters was noted and ex-
perimentally investigated, which is relevant to the quantification of the inverse relation
between decorrelation time (τc) and blood flow velocity (V), i.e., 1/τc = αV. A sidestream
dark-field–laser speckle contrast imaging (SDF-LSCI) device was designed to record the
specific vessels of the CAM at ED 9, grown ex ovo. V (by SDF) and τc (by LSCI) of the
same vessels were independently estimated. Thus, a practical speckle model, considering
multiple scattering (the influence on α), was summarised, and a blood flow velocity map
was generated. The vascularised CAM can be an intermediate calibration model [196].
Non-invasive imaging methods are still not optimal to evaluate blood flow, blood
volume and vascular change and cannot detect functionally structural changes in deep
tissues [157]. However, due to its uniqueness, the CAM could be a good platform to foster
more precise methods and tools to assess changes in normal tissue vasculature and tumour
blood vessels before and after treatment with different therapies, and thus to conduct
pharmacological research.
Author Contributions: Conceptualisation, L.C., Y.N. and Y.L.; literature search, all; writing—original
draft preparation, L.C., Y.N., Y.L. and S.W.; review and Editing, all; supervision, C.V.O., Y.N. and Y.L.;
Cells 2021, 10, 463 33 of 40
administration, C.V.O., Y.N. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and Y.N. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This study was partially funded by the FWO-NSFC project VS05621N, the KU Leu-
ven IOF−HB/12/018 OncoCiDia project, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos.
81603142, 81830052), the construction project of the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging
(18DZ2260400), the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Class II Plateau Disciplinary Con-
struction Program of Medical Technology of SUMHS, 2018–2020) and the CZC Pharmaceutical and
Technology Co., Ltd. Nanjing.
Conflicts of Interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Staton, C.A.; Stribbling, S.M.; Tazzyman, S.; Hughes, R.; Brown, N.J.; Lewis, C.E. Current methods for assaying angiogenesis
in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2004, 85, 233–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Ribatti, D. The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane in the study of tumor angiogenesis. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2008, 49,
131–135.
3. Chase, D.M.; Chaplin, D.J.; Monk, B.J. The development and use of vascular targeted therapy in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.
2017, 145, 393–406. [CrossRef]
4. Li, J. Research status mode Chicken chorioallantoic membrane applied for angiogenesis. Med. Front. 2015, 5, 4.
5. Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Swinnen, J.; Li, Y.; Ni, Y. A Review on Curability of Cancers: More Efforts for Novel
Therapeutic Options Are Needed. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1782. [CrossRef]
6. Ribatti, D.; Nico, B.; Perra, M.T.; Longo, V.; Maxia, C.; Annese, T.; Piras, F.; Murtas, D.; Sirigu, P. Erythropoietin is involved in
angiogenesis in human primary melanoma. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2010, 91, 495–499. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Richards, L.M.; Kazmi, S.M.; Davis, J.L.; Olin, K.E.; Dunn, A.K. Low-cost laser speckle contrast imaging of blood flow using a
webcam. Biomed. Opt. Express 2013, 4, 2269–2283. [CrossRef]
8. Makanya, A.N.; Dimova, I.; Koller, T.; Styp-Rekowska, B.; Djonov, V. Dynamics of the Developing Chick Chorioallantoic
Membrane Assessed by Stereology, Allometry, Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152821.
[CrossRef]
9. Romanoff, A. The Avian Embryo: Structural and Functional Development; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1960.
10. Bellairs, R.; Osmond, M. Extra-Embryonic Membranes. In Atlas of Chick Development; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
2014; pp. 127–129. [CrossRef]
11. Ribatti, D.; Nico, B.; Vacca, A.; Roncali, L.; Burri, P.H.; Djonov, V. Chorioallantoic membrane capillary bed: A useful target for
studying angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis in vivo. Anat. Rec. 2001, 264, 317–324. [CrossRef]
12. Kind, C. The development of the circulating blood volume of the chick embryo. Anat. Embryol. (Berl) 1975, 147, 127–132.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Maina, J.N. Structure and Function of the Shell and the Chorioallantoic Membrane of the Avian Egg: Embryonic Respiration. In
The Biology of the Avian Respiratory System; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 219–247. [CrossRef]
14. Ribatti, D. The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). A multifaceted experimental model. Mech. Dev. 2016, 141, 70–77.
[CrossRef]
15. Nowak-Sliwinska, P.; Segura, T.; Iruela-Arispe, M.L. The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and
bioengineering. Angiogenesis 2014, 17, 779–804. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Fuchs, A.; Lindenbaum, E.S. The two- and three-dimensional structure of the microcirculation of the chick chorioallantoic
membrane. Acta Anat. (Basel) 1988, 131, 271–275. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Mueller, C.A.; Burggren, W.W.; Tazawa, H. The Physiology of the Avian Embryo. In Sturkie’s Avian Physiology; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 739–766. [CrossRef]
18. DeFouw, D.O.; Rizzo, V.J.; Steinfeld, R.; Feinberg, R.N. Mapping of the microcirculation in the chick chorioallantoic membrane
during normal angiogenesis. Microvasc. Res. 1989, 38, 136–147. [CrossRef]
19. Tazawa, H.; Whittow, G. Incubation Physiology: Sturkie’s Avian Physiology; Academic Press: New York NY, USA, 2000; pp. 617–637.
20. Rahn, H.; Paganelli, C.V.; Ar, A. The avian egg: Air-cell gas tension, metabolism and incubation time. Respir. Physiol. 1974, 22,
297–309. [CrossRef]
21. Kurz, H.; Ambrosy, S.; Wilting, J.; Marme, D.; Christ, B. Proliferation pattern of capillary endothelial cells in chorioallantoic
membrane development indicates local growth control, which is counteracted by vascular endothelial growth factor application.
Dev. Dyn. 1995, 203, 174–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Piiper, J.; Tazawa, H.; Ar, A.; Rahn, H. Analysis of chorioallantoic gas exchange in the chick embryo. Respir. Physiol. 1980, 39,
273–284. [CrossRef]
23. Rahn, H.; Ar, A. Gas exchange of the avian egg time structure and function. Am. Zool. 1980, 20, 477–487. [CrossRef]
24. Vargas, A.; Zeisser-Labouebe, M.; Lange, N.; Gurny, R.; Delie, F. The chick embryo and its chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) for
the in vivo evaluation of drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 1162–1176. [CrossRef]
Cells 2021, 10, 463 34 of 40
25. Eichmann, A.; Yuan, L.; Moyon, D.; Lenoble, F.; Pardanaud, L.; Breant, C. Vascular development: From precursor cells to branched
arterial and venous networks. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2005, 49, 259–267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Ausprunk, D.H.; Knighton, D.R.; Folkman, J. Differentiation of vascular endothelium in the chick chorioallantois: A structural
and autoradiographic study. Dev. Biol. 1974, 38, 237–248. [CrossRef]
27. Kurz, H. Physiology of angiogenesis. J. Neurooncol. 2000, 50, 17–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Melkonian, G.; Munoz, N.; Chung, J.; Tong, C.; Marr, R.; Talbot, P. Capillary plexus development in the day five to day six chick
chorioallantoic membrane is inhibited by cytochalasin D and suramin. J. Exp. Zool. 2002, 292, 241–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Djonov, V.; Schmid, M.; Tschanz, S.A.; Burri, P.H. Intussusceptive angiogenesis: Its role in embryonic vascular network formation.
Circ. Res. 2000, 86, 286–292. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Burton, G.J.; Palmer, M.E. Development of the chick chorioallantoic capillary plexus under normoxic and normobaric hypoxic
and hyperoxic conditions: A morphometric study. J. Exp. Zool. 1992, 262, 291–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Maibier, M.; Reglin, B.; Nitzsche, B.; Xiang, W.; Rong, W.W.; Hoffmann, B.; Djonov, V.; Secomb, T.W.; Pries, A.R. Structure and
hemodynamics of vascular networks in the chorioallantoic membrane of the chicken. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016, 311,
H913–H926. [CrossRef]
32. Wagner-Amos, K.; Seymour, R.S. Effect of local shell conductance on the vascularisation of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane.
Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2003, 134, 155–167. [CrossRef]
33. Kirchner, L.M.; Schmidt, S.P.; Gruber, B.S. Quantitation of angiogenesis in the chick chorioallantoic membrane model using fractal
analysis. Microvasc. Res. 1996, 51, 2–14. [CrossRef]
34. Shumko, J.Z.; Defouw, D.O.; Feinberg, R.N. Vascular histodifferentiation in the chick chorioallantoic membrane: A morphometric
study. Anat. Rec. 1988, 220, 179–189. [CrossRef]
35. Smith, A.F.; Nitzsche, B.; Maibier, M.; Pries, A.R.; Secomb, T.W. Microvascular hemodynamics in the chick chorioallantoic
membrane. Microcirculation 2016, 23, 512–522. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Marinaccio, C.; Nico, B.; Ribatti, D. Differential expression of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic molecules in the chick embryo
chorioallantoic membrane and selected organs during embryonic development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013, 57, 907–916. [CrossRef]
37. Bai, Y.; Bai, L.; Zhou, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, L. Sequential delivery of VEGF, FGF-2 and PDGF from the polymeric system enhance
HUVECs angiogenesis in vitro and CAM angiogenesis. Cell Immunol. 2018, 323, 19–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Ribatti, D. Endogenous Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Is Implicated in the Vascularization of chick embryo chorioallantoic
membrane. Dev. Biol. 1995, 170, 39–49. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Forough, R.; Weylie, B.; Patel, C.; Ambrus, S.; Singh, U.S.; Zhu, J. Role of AKT/PKB signaling in fibroblast growth factor-1
(FGF-1)-induced angiogenesis in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). J. Cell. Biochem. 2005, 94, 109–116. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
40. Baum, O.; Suter, F.; Gerber, B.; Tschanz, S.A.; Buergy, R.; Blank, F.; Hlushchuk, R.; Djonov, V. VEGF-A promotes intussusceptive
angiogenesis in the developing chicken chorioallantoic membrane. Microcirculation 2010, 17, 447–457. [CrossRef]
41. Asahara, T.; Chen, D.; Takahashi, T.; Fujikawa, K.; Kearney, M.; Magner, M.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Isner, J.M. Tie2 receptor ligands,
angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2, modulate VEGF-induced postnatal neovascularization. Circ. Res. 1998, 83, 233–240. [CrossRef]
42. Drenkhahn, M.; Gescher, D.M.; Wolber, E.M.; Meyhoefer-Malik, A.; Malik, E. Expression of angiopoietin 1 and 2 in ectopic
endometrium on the chicken chorioallantoic membrane. Fertil. Steril. 2004, 81 (Suppl. 1), 869–875. [CrossRef]
43. Bussolino, E.D.R.M.; Ziche, M.; Bocchietto, E.; Olivero, M.; Naldini, L.; Gaudino, G.T.L.; Coffer, A.; Comoglio, P. Hepatocyte
growth factor is a potent angiogenic factor which stimulates endothelial cell motility and growth. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119, 629–641.
[CrossRef]
44. Eva, V. Structural Analysis of the Angiogenesis in the Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane. Doctoral Thesis, KU LEUVEN, Leuven,
Belgium, 2011.
45. Reuten, R.; Patel, T.R.; McDougall, M.; Rama, N.; Nikodemus, D.; Gibert, B.; Delcros, J.G.; Prein, C.; Meier, M.; Metzger, S.; et al.
Structural decoding of netrin-4 reveals a regulatory function towards mature basement membranes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13515.
[CrossRef]
46. Rous, P.; Murppy, J. Tumor Implantations in the Developing Embryo. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1911, 56, 741–742. [CrossRef]
47. Nikiforidis, G.; Papazafiropoulos, D.; Siablis, D.; Karnabatidis, D.; Hatjikondi, O.; Dimopoulos, J. Quantitative assessment of
angiogenesis in the chick embryo and its chorioallantoic membrane by computerised analysis of angiographic images. Eur. J.
Radiol. 1999, 29, 168–179. [CrossRef]
48. Lange, N.; Ballini, J.P.; Wagnieres, G.; van den Bergh, H. A new drug-screening procedure for photosensitizing agents used in
photodynamic therapy for CNV. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 38–46.
49. Li, J.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shao, H.; Cona, M.M.; Wang, H.; Marysael, T.; Chen, F.; Prinsen, K.; Zhou, L.; et al. A dual-targeting
anticancer approach: Soil and seed principle. Radiology 2011, 260, 799–807. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Dikici, S.; Bullock, A.J.; Yar, M.; Claeyssens, F.; MacNeil, S. 2-deoxy-d-ribose (2dDR) upregulates vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF) and stimulates angiogenesis. Microvasc. Res. 2020, 131, 104035. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Mangir, N.; Dikici, S.; Claeyssens, F.; MacNeil, S. Using ex Ovo Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay To Evaluate the
Biocompatibility and Angiogenic Response to Biomaterials. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 3190–3200. [CrossRef]
52. Nowak-Sliwinska, P.; Ballini, J.P.; Wagnieres, G.; van den Bergh, H. Processing of fluorescence angiograms for the quantification
of vascular effects induced by anti-angiogenic agents in the CAM model. Microvasc. Res. 2010, 79, 21–28. [CrossRef]
Cells 2021, 10, 463 35 of 40
53. Vu, B.T.; Shahin, S.A.; Croissant, J.; Fatieiev, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Le-Hoang Doan, T.; Yik, T.; Simargi, S.; Conteras, A.; Ratliff, L.;
et al. Chick chorioallantoic membrane assay as an in vivo model to study the effect of nanoparticle-based anticancer drugs in
ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8524. [CrossRef]
54. Buchele, B.; Zugmaier, W.; Genze, F.; Simmet, T. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of acetyl-11-keto-
alpha-boswellic acid, a novel pentacyclic triterpenoid, in plasma using a fluorinated stationary phase and photodiode array
detection: Application in pharmacokinetic studies. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2005, 829, 144–148. [CrossRef]
55. Fotinos, N.; Campo, M.A.; Popowycz, F.; Gurny, R.; Lange, N. 5-Aminolevulinic acid derivatives in photomedicine: Characteristics,
application and perspectives. Photochem. Photobiol. 2006, 82, 994–1015. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Mangir, N.; Raza, A.; Haycock, J.W.; Chapple, C.; Macneil, S. An Improved In Vivo Methodology to Visualise Tumour Induced
Changes in Vasculature Using the Chick Chorionic Allantoic Membrane Assay. In Vivo 2018, 32, 461–472. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Dikici, S.; Mangir, N.; Claeyssens, F.; Yar, M.; MacNeil, S. Exploration of 2-deoxy-D-ribose and 17beta-Estradiol as alternatives to
exogenous VEGF to promote angiogenesis in tissue-engineered constructs. Regen. Med. 2019, 14, 179–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Meadows, D. Recent developments with biosensing technology and applications in the pharmaceutical industry. Adv. Drug Deliv.
Rev. 1996, 21, 179–189. [CrossRef]
59. Valdes, T.I.; Klueh, U.; Kreutzer, D.; Moussy, F. Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for testing
biosensors. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2003, 67, 215–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Klueh, U.; Dorsky, D.I.; Kreutzer, D.L. Enhancement of implantable glucose sensor function in vivo using gene transfer-induced
neovascularization. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 1155–1163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Murphy. The effect of adult chicken organ grafts on CAM. J. Exp. Med. 1916, 24, 1–5. [CrossRef]
62. Chiba, A.; Yui, C.; Hirano, S. Liver reconstruction on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 2010,
73, 45–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Navarro, M.; DeRuiter, M.C.; Carretero, A.; Ruberte, J. Microvascular assembly and cell invasion in chick mesonephros grafted
onto chorioallantoic membrane. J. Anat. 2003, 202, 213–225. [CrossRef]
64. Bertossi, M.; Virgintino, D.; Coltey, P.; Errede, M.; Mancini, L.; Roncali, L. Angiogenesis and endothelium phenotype expression
in embryonic adrenal gland and cerebellum grafted onto chorioallantoic membrane. Angiogenesis 1999, 3, 305–315. [CrossRef]
65. Moreno-Jimenez, I.; Hulsart-Billstrom, G.; Lanham, S.A.; Janeczek, A.A.; Kontouli, N.; Kanczler, J.M.; Evans, N.D.; Oreffo, R.O.
The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay for the study of human bone regeneration: A refinement animal model for tissue
engineering. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32168. [CrossRef]
66. Noiman, T.; Buzhor, E.; Metsuyanim, S.; Harari-Steinberg, O.; Morgenshtern, C.; Dekel, B.; Goldstein, R.S. A rapid in vivo assay
system for analyzing the organogenetic capacity of human kidney cells. Organogenesis 2011, 7, 140–144. [CrossRef]
67. Maas, J.W.; Le Noble, F.A.; Dunselman, G.A.; de Goeij, A.F.; Boudier, H.A.S.; Evers, J.L. The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic
Membrane as a Model to Investigate the Angiogenic Properties of Human Endometrium. Gynecol. Obs. Investig. 1999, 48, 5.
[CrossRef]
68. Kunzi-Rapp, K.; Rück, A.; Kaufmann, R. Characterization of the chick chorioallantoic membrane model as a short-term in vivo
system for human skin. Arch. Derm. Res. 1999, 6, 290–295. [CrossRef]
69. Isachenko, V.; Isachenko, E.; Mallmann, P.; Rahimi, G. Increasing Follicular and Stromal Cell Proliferation in Cryopreserved
Human Ovarian Tissue after Long-Term Precooling Prior to Freezing: In Vitro versus Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM)
Xenotransplantation. Cell Transplant. 2013, 22, 2053–2061. [CrossRef]
70. Ausprunk, D.H.; Knighton, D.R.; Folkman, J. Vascularization of normal and neoplastic tissues grafted to the chick chorioallantois.
Role of host and preexisting graft blood vessels. Am. J. Pathol 1975, 79, 597–618. [PubMed]
71. Wong, C.; Inman, E.; Spaethe, R.; Helgerson, S. Fibrin-based biomaterials to deliver human growth factors. Thromb. Haemost.
2003, 89, 573–582. [CrossRef]
72. Steffens, G.C.; Yao, C.; Prevel, P.; Markowicz, M.; Schenck, P.; Noah, E.M.; Pallua, N. Modulation of angiogenic potential of
collagen matrices by covalent incorporation of heparin and loading with vascular endothelial growth factor. Tissue Eng. 2004, 10,
1502–1509. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Ribatti, D. The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane in the Study of Angiogenesis and Metastasis; Springer: Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 2010. [CrossRef]
74. Beckers, M.; Gladis-Villanueva, M.; Hamann, W.; Schmutzler, W.; Zwadlo-Klarwasser, G. The use of the chorio-allantoic
membrane of the chick embryo as test for anti-inflammatory activity. Inflamm Res. 1997, 46, 29–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75. Wilting, J.; Christ, B.; Bokeloh, M. A modified chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay for qualitative and quantitative study of
growth factors. Studies on the effects of carriers, PBS, angiogenin, and bFGF. Anat. Embryol. (Berl) 1991, 183, 259–271. [CrossRef]
76. Langer, R.; Folkman, J. Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. Nature 1976, 263, 797–800.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
77. Yang, E.Y.; Moses, H.L. Transforming growth factor beta 1-induced changes in cell migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis in
the chicken chorioallantoic membrane. J. Cell Biol. 1990, 111, 731–741. [CrossRef]
78. Riboldi, E.; Musso, T.; Moroni, E.; Urbinati, C.; Bernasconi, S.; Rusnati, M.; Adorini, L.; Presta, M.; Sozzani, S. Cutting edge:
Proangiogenic properties of alternatively activated dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 2788–2792. [CrossRef]
79. Ribatti, D.; Nico, B.; Vacca, A.; Presta, M. The gelatin sponge-chorioallantoic membrane assay. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 85–91.
[CrossRef]
Cells 2021, 10, 463 36 of 40
80. Dreesmann, L.; Ahlers, M.; Schlosshauer, B. The pro-angiogenic characteristics of a cross-linked gelatin matrix. Biomaterials 2007,
28, 5536–5543. [CrossRef]
81. Yao, C.; Markowicz, M.; Pallua, N.; Noah, E.M.; Steffens, G. The effect of cross-linking of collagen matrices on their angiogenic
capability. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 66–74. [CrossRef]
82. Kanczler, J.M.; Barry, J.; Ginty, P.; Howdle, S.M.; Shakesheff, K.M.; Oreffo, R.O. Supercritical carbon dioxide generated vascular
endothelial growth factor encapsulated poly(DL-lactic acid) scaffolds induce angiogenesis in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
2007, 352, 135–141. [CrossRef]
83. Wacker, B.K.; Scott, E.A.; Kaneda, M.M.; Alford, S.K.; Elbert, D.L. Delivery of sphingosine 1-phosphate from poly(ethylene glycol)
hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 1335–1343. [CrossRef]
84. Auerbach, R.; Lewis, R.; Shinners, B.; Kubai, L.; Akhtar, N. Angiogenesis assays: A critical overview. Clin. Chem. 2003, 49, 32–40.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
85. Ribatti, D. The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane. In Vivo Models to Study Angiogenesis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–23. [CrossRef]
86. Gualandris, A.; Rusnati, M.; Bastaki, M.; Ziche, M.; Presta, M. Basic Fribroblast Growth Factor Overexpression in Endothelial Cells: An
Autocrine Mechanism for Angiogenesis and Angioproliferative Diseases; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1998. [CrossRef]
87. Ehrbar, M.; Djonov, V.G.; Schnell, C.; Tschanz, S.A.; Martiny-Baron, G.; Schenk, U.; Wood, J.; Burri, P.H.; Hubbell, J.A.; Zisch, A.H.
Cell-demanded liberation of VEGF121 from fibrin implants induces local and controlled blood vessel growth. Circ. Res. 2004, 94,
1124–1132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
88. Miller, W.J.; Kayton, M.L.; Patton, A.; O’Connor, S.; He, M.; Vu, H.; Baibakov, G.; Lorang, D.; Knezevic, V.; Kohn, E.; et al. A
novel technique for quantifying changes in vascular density, endothelial cell proliferation and protein expression in response
to modulators of angiogenesis using the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. J. Transl. Med. 2004, 2, 4. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
89. Ribatti, D. The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as an In Vivo Assay to Study Antiangiogenesis. Pharmaceuticals 2010, 3,
482–513. [CrossRef]
90. As, M.N.; Deshpande, R.; Kale, V.P.; Bhonde, R.R.; Datar, S.P. Establishment of an in ovo chick embryo yolk sac membrane (YSM)
assay for pilot screening of potential angiogenic and anti-angiogenic agents. Cell Biol. Int. 2018, 42, 1474–1483. [CrossRef]
91. Liu, Q.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Z.; Luo, Q. Laser speckle contrast imaging: Monitoring blood flow dynamics and vascular structure of
photodynamic therapy. In Proceedings of the Optics in Health Care and Biomedical Optics: Diagnostics and Treatment II, Beijing,
China, 12 November 2004.
92. Ismail, M.S.; Torsten, U.; Dressler, C.; Diederichs, J.E.; Huske, S.; Weitzel, H.; Berlien, H.P. Photodynamic Therapy of Malignant
Ovarian Tumours Cultivated on CAM. Lasers Med. Sci. 1999, 14, 91–96. [CrossRef]
93. FDA, W.H.C.F.G. Guidance for industry: Chronic cutaneous ulcer and burn wounds-developing products for treatment. Wound
Repair. Regen. 2001, 9, 258–268. [CrossRef]
94. Ribatti, D.; Vacca, A.; Ranieri, G.; Sorino, S.; Roncali, L. The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as an in vivo Wound
Healing Model. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1996, 192, 1068–1076. [CrossRef]
95. Ribatti, D.; Nico, B.; Vacca, A.; Roncali, L.; Presta, M. Endogenous and exogenous fibroblast growth factor-2 modulate wound
healing in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Angiogenesis 1999, 3, 89–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
96. Jackson, C.J.; Xue, M.; Thompson, P.; Davey, R.A.; Whitmont, K.; Smith, S.; Buisson-Legendre, N.; Sztynda, T.; Furphy, L.J.;
Cooper, A.; et al. Activated protein C prevents inflammation yet stimulates angiogenesis to promote cutaneous wound healing.
Wound Repair. Regen. 2005, 13, 284–294. [CrossRef]
97. Guerra, A.; Belinha, J.; Mangir, N.; MacNeil, S.; Natal Jorge, R. Sprouting Angiogenesis: A Numerical Approach with Experimental
Validation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 49, 871–884. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
98. Murphy, J.B. Transplantability of Tissues to the Embryo of Foreign Species : Its Bearing on Questions of Tissue Specificity and
Tumor Immunity. J. Exp. Med. 1913, 17, 482–493. [CrossRef]
99. Deryugina, E.I.; Quigley, J.P. Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model systems to study and visualize human tumor cell
metastasis. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 130, 1119–1130. [CrossRef]
100. Karnofsky, D.A.; Ridgway, L.P.; Patterson, P.A. Tumor transplantation to the chick embryo. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1952, 55, 313–329.
[CrossRef]
101. Kunzi-Rapp, K.; Westphal-Frosch, C.; Schneckenburger, H. Test system for human tumor cell sensitivity to drugs on chicken
chorioallantoic membranes. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. 1992, 28, 565–566. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
102. Knighton, D.; Ausprunk, D.; Tapper, D.; Folkman, J. Avascular and vascular phases of tumour growth in the chick embryo. Br. J.
Cancer 1977, 35, 347–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
103. Bobek, V.; Plachy, J.; Pinterova, D.; Kolostova, K.; Boubelik, M.; Jiang, P.; Yang, M.; Hoffman, R.M. Development of a green
fluorescent protein metastatic-cancer chick-embryo drug-screen model. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2004, 21, 347–352. [CrossRef]
104. Pinto, M.T.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Conde, I.; Carvalho, R.; Paredes, J. The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model: A New In Vivo Tool to
Evaluate Breast Cancer Stem Cell Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 334. [CrossRef]
105. Armstrong, P.B.; Quigley, J.P.; Sidebottom, E. Transepithelial invasion and intramesenchymal infiltration of the chick embryo
chorioallantois by tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1982, 42, 1826–1837.
Cells 2021, 10, 463 37 of 40
106. Scher, C.D.; Haudenschild, C.; Klagsbrun, M. The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a model system for the study of tissue
invasion by viral transformed cells. Cell 1976, 8, 373–382. [CrossRef]
107. Wilson, S.M.; Chambers, A.F. Experimental metastasis assays in the chick embryo. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2004, 21, 19.6.1–19.6.24.
[CrossRef]
108. Quigley, J.P.; Armstrong, P.B. Tumor cell intravasation alu-cidated: The chick embryo opens the window. Cell 1998, 94, 281–284.
[CrossRef]
109. Harris, J.J. The human tumor grown in the egg. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1958, 76, 764–769. [CrossRef]
110. Dunker, N.; Jendrossek, V. Implementation of the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model in Radiation Biology and
Experimental Radiation Oncology Research. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1499. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
111. Syrovets, T.; Gschwend, J.E.; Buchele, B.; Laumonnier, Y.; Zugmaier, W.; Genze, F.; Simmet, T. Inhibition of IkappaB kinase activity
by acetyl-boswellic acids promotes apoptosis in androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol.
Chem. 2005, 280, 6170–6180. [CrossRef]
112. Pastorino, F.; Brignole, C.; Di Paolo, D.; Nico, B.; Pezzolo, A.; Marimpietri, D.; Pagnan, G.; Piccardi, F.; Cilli, M.; Longhi, R.; et al.
Targeting liposomal chemotherapy via both tumor cell-specific and tumor vasculature-specific ligands potentiates therapeutic
efficacy. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10073–10082. [CrossRef]
113. Chin, W.W.; Lau, W.K.; Bhuvaneswari, R.; Heng, P.W.; Olivo, M. Chlorin e6-polyvinylpyrrolidone as a fluorescent marker for
fluorescence diagnosis of human bladder cancer implanted on the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Cancer Lett. 2007, 245,
127–133. [CrossRef]
114. Gottfried, V.; Davidi, R.; Averguj, C.; Kimel, S. In vivo damage to chorioallantoic membrane blood vessels by porphycene-induced
photodynamic therapy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1995, 30, 115–121. [CrossRef]
115. Valiulyte, I.; Curkunaviciute, R.; Ribokaite, L.; Kazlauskas, A.; Vaitkeviciute, M.; Skauminas, K.; Valanciute, A. The Anti-
Tumorigenic Activity of Sema3C in the Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5672.
[CrossRef]
116. Lokman, N.A.; Elder, A.S.; Ricciardelli, C.; Oehler, M.K. Chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay as an in vivo model to
study the effect of newly identified molecules on ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 9959–9970.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
117. Yan, X.; Piterski, C.; Nitka, S. Evaluation of the hen’s egg test-chorioallantonic membrane (CAM) method in prediction of the eye
irritation potential formulated personal wash products. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 2007, 26, 25–36. [CrossRef]
118. Xie, X.; Tan, X. Application of Hen’s egg-chorioallantoic membrane assay in safety evaluation of cosmetics. China Trop. Med. 2009,
9, 2.
119. Abdelkader, H.; Ismail, S.; Hussein, A.; Wu, Z.; Al-Kassas, R.; Alany, R.G. Conjunctival and corneal tolerability assessment of
ocular naltrexone niosomes and their ingredients on the hen’s egg chorioallantoic membrane and excised bovine cornea models.
Int. J. Pharm. 2012, 432, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
120. de Avila, R.I.; de Sousa Vieira, M.; Gaeti, M.P.; Moreira, L.C.; de Brito Rodrigues, L.; de Oliveira, G.A.; Batista, A.C.; Vinhal, D.C.;
Menegatti, R.; Valadares, M.C. Toxicity evaluation of the photoprotective compound LQFM048: Eye irritation, skin toxicity and
genotoxic endpoints. Toxicology 2017, 376, 83–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
121. Hamamichi, S.; Nishigori, H. Establishment of a chick embryo shell-less culture system and its use to observe change in behavior
caused by nicotine and substances from cigarette smoke. Toxicol. Lett. 2001, 119, 95–102. [CrossRef]
122. Datar, S.; Bhonde, R.R. Shell-less chick embryo culture as an alternative in vitro model to investigate glucose-induced malforma-
tions in mammalian embryos. Rev. Diabet Stud. 2005, 2, 221–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
123. Yang, L.; Dou, W.; Yan, C.; Liu, T.; Wei, D. Study on Toxicity of Angelica Sinensis Injection and Astragalus Membranaceus
Injection in Chorioallantoic Membrane Model. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2009, 15.
124. Siemann, D.W.; Bibby, M.C.; Dark, G.G.; Dicker, A.P.; Eskens, F.A.; Horsman, M.R.; Marme, D.; Lorusso, P.M. Differentiation and
definition of vascular-targeted therapies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 416–420.
125. Hinnen, P.; Eskens, F.A. Vascular disrupting agents in clinical development. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 96, 1159–1165. [CrossRef]
126. Das, M.; Wakelee, H. Vascular disrupting agents. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, S482–S483. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
127. Siemann, D.W. The unique characteristics of tumor vasculature and preclinical evidence for its selective disruption by Tumor-
Vascular Disrupting Agents. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2011, 37, 63–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
128. Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, G.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, H.; Yu, B.; Sun, J. Preclinical Pharmacokinetics of C118P, a Novel Prodrug
of Microtubules Inhibitor and Its Metabolite C118 in Mice, Rats, and Dogs. Molecules 2018, 23, 2883. [CrossRef]
129. Muenzner, J.K.; Biersack, B.; Kalie, H.; Andronache, I.C.; Kaps, L.; Schuppan, D.; Sasse, F.; Schobert, R. Gold(I) biscarbene
complexes derived from vascular-disrupting combretastatin A-4 address different targets and show antimetastatic potential.
ChemMedChem 2014, 9, 1195–1204. [CrossRef]
130. Jiang, Z.; Wu, M.; Miao, J.; Duan, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, X.; et al. Deoxypodophyllotoxin
exerts both anti-angiogenic and vascular disrupting effects. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 1710–1719. [CrossRef]
131. Kim, K.W.; Lee, J.M.; Jeon, Y.S.; Lee, I.J.; Choi, Y.; Park, J.; Kiefer, B.; Kim, C.; Han, J.K.; Choi, B.I. Vascular disrupting effect of
CKD-516: Preclinical study using DCE-MRI. Investig. New Drugs 2013, 31, 1097–1106. [CrossRef]
132. Pasquier, E.; Sinnappan, S.; Munoz, M.A.; Kavallaris, M. ENMD-1198, a new analogue of 2-methoxyestradiol, displays both
antiangiogenic and vascular-disrupting properties. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 1408–1418. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 2021, 10, 463 38 of 40
133. Ren, X.; Dai, M.; Lin, L.P.; Li, P.K.; Ding, J. Anti-angiogenic and vascular disrupting effects of C9, a new microtubule-
depolymerizing agent. Br. J. Pharm. 2009, 156, 1228–1238. [CrossRef]
134. Petitclerc, E.; Deschesnes, R.G.; Cote, M.F.; Marquis, C.; Janvier, R.; Lacroix, J.; Miot-Noirault, E.; Legault, J.; Mounetou, E.;
Madelmont, J.C.; et al. Antiangiogenic and antitumoral activity of phenyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)ureas: A class of soft alkylating
agents disrupting microtubules that are unaffected by cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 4654–4663.
[CrossRef]
135. Hu, C.B.; Chen, C.P.; Yeh, T.K.; Song, J.S.; Chang, C.Y.; Chuu, J.J.; Tung, F.F.; Ho, P.Y.; Chen, T.W.; Lin, C.H.; et al. BPR0C261 is a
novel orally active antitumor agent with antimitotic and anti-angiogenic activities. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 182–191. [CrossRef]
136. Chen, C.P.; Hu, C.B.; Yeh, K.C.; Song, J.S.; Yeh, T.K.; Tung, F.F.; Hwang, L.L.; Tseng, H.Y.; Huang, Y.C.; Shy, H.S.; et al.
Antiangiogenic activities and cisplatin-combined antitumor activities of BPR0L075. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 2813–2822. [PubMed]
137. Tuma, M.C.; Malikzay, A.; Ouyang, X.; Surguladze, D.; Fleming, J.; Mitelman, S.; Camara, M.; Finnerty, B.; Doody, J.; Chekler,
E.L.; et al. Antitumor Activity of IMC-038525, a Novel Oral Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitor. Transl. Oncol. 2010, 3, 318–325.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
138. Tozer, G.M. Measuring tumour vascular response to antivascular and antiangiogenic drugs. Br. J. Radiol. 2003, 76, S23–S35.
[CrossRef]
139. Sosa, J.A.; Elisei, R.; Jarzab, B.; Balkissoon, J.; Lu, S.P.; Bal, C.; Marur, S.; Gramza, A.; Yosef, R.B.; Gitlitz, B.; et al. Randomized
safety and efficacy study of fosbretabulin with paclitaxel/carboplatin against anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2014, 24,
232–240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
140. Zweifel, M.; Jayson, G.C.; Reed, N.S.; Osborne, R.; Hassan, B.; Ledermann, J.; Shreeves, G.; Poupard, L.; Lu, S.P.; Balkissoon, J.;
et al. Phase II trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 2036–2041. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
141. Siemann, D.W.; Shi, W. Dual targeting of tumor vasculature: Combining Avastin and vascular disrupting agents (CA4P or
OXi4503). Anticancer Res. 2008, 28, 2027–2031. [PubMed]
142. Garon, E.B.; Neidhart, J.D.; Gabrail, N.Y.; de Oliveira, M.R.; Balkissoon, J.; Kabbinavar, F. A randomized Phase II trial of the
tumor vascular disrupting agent CA4P (fosbretabulin tromethamine) with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in advanced
nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016, 9, 7275–7283. [CrossRef]
143. Monk, B.; Herzog, T.; Alvarez, R.; Chan, J.; Chase, D.; Couchenour, R.; Cram, C.; Bookman, M. FOCUS study: Physician’s choice
chemotherapy (PCC) plus bevacizumab and CA4P versus PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo in platinum-resistant ovarian
cancer. In Proceedings of the International Gynecologic Cancer Societ, Lisbon, Portugal, 29–31 October 2016.
144. Su, M.; Huang, J.; Liu, S.; Xiao, Y.; Qin, X.; Liu, J.; Pi, C.; Luo, T.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; et al. The anti-angiogenic effect and novel
mechanisms of action of Combretastatin A-4. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
145. Mahal, K.; Resch, M.; Ficner, R.; Schobert, R.; Biersack, B.; Mueller, T. Effects of the tumor-vasculature-disrupting agent verubulin
and two heteroaryl analogues on cancer cells, endothelial cells, and blood vessels. ChemMedChem 2014, 9, 847–854. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
146. Rovithi, M.; Avan, A.; Funel, N.; Leon, L.G.; Gomez, V.E.; Wurdinger, T.; Griffioen, A.W.; Verheul, H.M.W.; Giovannetti, E.
Development of bioluminescent chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) models for primary pancreatic cancer cells: A platform
for drug testing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [CrossRef]
147. Kue, C.S.; Tan, K.Y.; Lam, M.L.; Lee, H.B. Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM): An alternative predictive model in
acute toxicological studies for anti-cancer drugs. Exp. Anim. 2015, 64, 129–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
148. Tay, S.L.; Heng, P.W.; Chan, L.W. The chick chorioallantoic membrane imaging method as a platform to evaluate vasoactivity and
assess irritancy of compounds. J. Pharm. Pharm. 2012, 64, 1128–1137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
149. Larger, E.; Marre, M.; Corvol, P.; Gasc, J.M. Hyperglycemia-induced defects in angiogenesis in the chicken chorioallantoic
membrane model. Diabetes 2004, 53, 752–761. [CrossRef]
150. Ferician, O.; Cimpean, A.M.; Avram, S.; Raica, M. Endostatin Effects on Tumor Cells and Vascular Network of Human Renal Cell
Carcinoma Implanted on Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 6521–6528.
151. Schlatter, P.; Konig, M.F.; Karlsson, L.M.; Burri, P.H. Quantitative study of intussusceptive capillary growth in the chorioallantoic
membrane (CAM) of the chicken embryo. Microvasc. Res. 1997, 54, 65–73. [CrossRef]
152. Ribatti, D. The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model for tumor biology. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 328, 314–324. [CrossRef]
153. Kunz, P.; Schenker, A.; Sahr, H.; Lehner, B.; Fellenberg, J. Optimization of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay as reliable
in vivo model for the analysis of osteosarcoma. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215312. [CrossRef]
154. Hu, J.; Ishihara, M.; Chin, A.I.; Wu, L. Establishment of xenografts of urological cancers on chicken chorioallantoic membrane
(CAM) to study metastasis. Precis. Clin. Med. 2019, 2, 140–151. [CrossRef]
155. Eckrich, J.; Kugler, P.; Buhr, C.R.; Ernst, B.P.; Mendler, S.; Baumgart, J.; Brieger, J.; Wiesmann, N. Monitoring of tumor growth
and vascularization with repetitive ultrasonography in the chicken chorioallantoic-membrane-assay. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18585.
[CrossRef]
156. Merckx, G.; Tay, H.; Lo Monaco, M.; van Zandvoort, M.; De Spiegelaere, W.; Lambrichts, I.; Bronckaers, A. Chorioallantoic
Membrane Assay as Model for Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Focus on Stem Cells. Tissue Eng. Part. B Rev. 2020. [CrossRef]
157. McDonald, D.M.; Choyke, P.L. Imaging of angiogenesis: From microscope to clinic. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 713–725. [CrossRef]
158. Weibel, E.R. Stereological Methods; Academic Press: London, UK, 1979.
Cells 2021, 10, 463 39 of 40
159. Ribatti, D. Chicken chorioallantoic membrane angiogenesis model. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 843, 47–57. [CrossRef]
160. Palmer, T.D.; Lewis, J.; Zijlstra, A. Quantitative analysis of cancer metastasis using an avian embryo model. J. Vis. Exp. 2011.
[CrossRef]
161. Zijlstra, A.; Lewis, J.D. Visualization and Quantification of De Novo Angiogenesis in Ex Ovo Chicken Embryos. In The Textbook of
Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis: Methods and Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 217–240. [CrossRef]
162. Kellermeier, M.; Bert, C.; Muller, R.G. A novel concept for CT with fixed anodes (FACT): Medical imaging based on the feasibility
of thermal load capacity. Phys. Med. 2015, 31, 425–434. [CrossRef]
163. Padhani, A.R.; Neeman, M. Challenges for imaging angiogenesis. Br. J. Radiol. 2001, 74, 886–890. [CrossRef]
164. Agostini, A.; Borgheresi, A.; Mari, A.; Floridi, C.; Bruno, F.; Carotti, M.; Schicchi, N.; Barile, A.; Maggi, S.; Giovagnoni, A.
Dual-energy CT: Theoretical principles and clinical applications. Radiol. Med. 2019, 124, 1281–1295. [CrossRef]
165. Henning, A.L.; Jiang, M.X.; Yalcin, H.C.; Butcher, J.T. Quantitative three-dimensional imaging of live avian embryonic morpho-
genesis via micro-computed tomography. Dev. Dyn. 2011, 240, 1949–1957. [CrossRef]
166. Siamblis, D.; Karnabatidis, D.; Hatjikondi, O.; Kalogeropoulou, C.; Kardamakis, D.; Dimopoulos, J. A novel radiological approach
for the experimental study of angiogenesis: Angiography of the chick embryo and its chorioallantoic membrane. Eur. J. Radiol.
1996, 21, 220–224. [CrossRef]
167. Karnabatidis, D.; Dimopoulos, J.C.A.; Siablis, D.; Papazafiropoulos, D.; Kalogeropoulou, C.P.; Nikiforidis, G. Quantification of the
ionising radiation effect over angiogenesis in the chick embryo and its chorioallantoic membrane by computerised analysis of
angiographic images. Acta Radiol. 2016, 42, 333–338. [CrossRef]
168. Siablis, D.; Liatsikos, E.N.; Karnabatidis, D.; Kagadis, G.C.; Sakelaropoulos, G.C.; Maroulis, J.; Kardamakis, D.; Athanassopoulos,
A.; Perimenis, P.; Nikiforidis, G.; et al. Digital subtraction angiography and computer assisted image analysis for the evaluation
of the antiangiogenetic effect of ionizing radiation on tumor angiogenesis. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2006, 38, 407–411. [CrossRef]
169. Zhang, X.; Yelbuz, T.M.; Cofer, G.P.; Choma, M.A.; Kirby, M.L.; Johnson, G.A. Improved preparation of chick embryonic samples
for magnetic resonance microscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003, 49, 1192–1195. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
170. Chesnick, I.E.; Fowler, C.B.; Mason, J.T.; Potter, K. Novel mineral contrast agent for magnetic resonance studies of bone implants
grown on a chick chorioallantoic membrane. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011, 29, 1244–1254. [CrossRef]
171. Kivrak Pfiffner, F.; Waschkies, C.; Tian, Y.; Woloszyk, A.; Calcagni, M.; Giovanoli, P.; Rudin, M.; Buschmann, J. A new in vivo
magnetic resonance imaging method to noninvasively monitor and quantify the perfusion capacity of three-dimensional
biomaterials grown on the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos. Tissue Eng. Part. C Methods 2015, 21, 339–346. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
172. Warnock, G.; Turtoi, A.; Blomme, A.; Bretin, F.; Bahri, M.A.; Lemaire, C.; Libert, L.C.; Seret, A.E.; Luxen, A.; Castronovo, V.; et al.
In vivo PET/CT in a human glioblastoma chicken chorioallantoic membrane model: A new tool for oncology and radiotracer
development. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1782–1788. [CrossRef]
173. Kolkman, R.G.M.; Wang, L.V.; Huisjes, A.; Siphanto, R.I.; Steenbergen, W.; van Leeuwen, T.G. Photoacoustic imaging of blood
vessels in the chorioallantoic membrane of a chicken embryo. In Proceedings of the Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and
Sensing, San Jose, CA, USA, 12 July 2004.
174. Zeng, L.; Da, X.; Gu, H.; Yang, D.; Yang, S.; Xiang, L. High antinoise photoacoustic tomography based on a modified filtered
backprojection algorithm with combination wavelet. Med. Phys. 2007, 34, 556–563. [CrossRef]
175. Eom, J.; Park, S.J.; Lee, B.H. Noncontact photoacoustic tomography of in vivo chicken chorioallantoic membrane based on all-fiber
heterodyne interferometry. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20, 106007. [CrossRef]
176. Telenko, S.A.; Vargas, G.; Nelson, J.S.; Milner, T.E. Coherent thermal wave imaging of subsurface chromophores in biological
materials. Phys. Med. Biol. 2002, 47, 657–671. [CrossRef]
177. Qi, W.; Liu, G.; Chen, Z.; De Magalhães, N. In-vivo three-dimensional Doppler variance imaging for tumor angiogenesis on
chorioallantoic membrane. In Proceedings of the Dynamics and Fluctuations in Biomedical Photonics VIII, San Francisco, CA,
USA, 10 February 2011.
178. Huang, D.; Swanson, E.A.; Lin, C.P.; Schuman, J.S.; Stinson, W.G.; Chang, W.; Hee, M.R.; Flotte, T.; Gregory, K.; Puliafito, C.A.;
et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991, 254, 1178–1181. [CrossRef]
179. Fujimoto, J.G.; Pitris, C.; Boppart, S.A.; Brezinski, M.E. Optical coherence tomography: An emerging technology for biomedical
imaging and optical biopsy. Neoplasia 2000, 2, 9–25. [CrossRef]
180. Chang, S.; Mao, Y.; Flueraru, C.; Sherif, S. Optical coherence tomography: Technology and applications. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optical Systems and Optoelectronic Instruments, Beijing,
China, 26 January 2009.
181. Chen, Z.; Milner, T.E.; Srinivas, S.; Wang, X.; Malekafzali, A.; van Gemert, M.J.; Nelson, J.S. Noninvasive imaging of in vivo blood
flow velocity using optical Doppler tomography. Opt. Lett. 1997, 22, 1119–1121. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
182. Bonner, R.; Nossal, R. Model for laser Doppler measurements of blood flow in tissue. Appl. Opt. 1981, 20, 2097–2107. [CrossRef]
183. O’Doherty, J.; McNamara, P.; Clancy, N.T.; Enfield, J.G.; Leahy, M.J. Comparison of instruments for investigation of microcircula-
tory blood flow and red blood cell concentration. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14, 034025. [CrossRef]
184. Forrester, K.R.; Tulip, J.; Leonard, C.; Stewart, C.; Bray, R.C. A laser speckle imaging technique for measuring tissue perfusion.
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 51, 2074–2084. [CrossRef]
Cells 2021, 10, 463 40 of 40
185. Tay, S.L.; Heng, P.W.; Chan, L.W. The CAM-LDPI method: A novel platform for the assessment of drug absorption. J. Pharm.
Pharm. 2012, 64, 517–529. [CrossRef]
186. Leahy, M.J.; de Mul, F.F.; Nilsson, G.E.; Maniewski, R. Principles and practice of the laser-Doppler perfusion technique. Technol.
Health Care 1999, 7, 143–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
187. Borozdova, M.A.; Fedosov, I.V.; Tuchin, V.V. Laser Doppler anemometer signal processing for blood flow velocity measurements.
Quantum Electron. 2015, 45, 275–282. [CrossRef]
188. Fercher, A.F.; Briers, J.D. Flow visualization by means of single-exposure speckle photography. Opt. Commun. 1981, 37, 326–330.
[CrossRef]
189. van As, K.; Boterman, J.; Kleijn, C.R.; Kenjeres, S.; Bhattacharya, N. Laser speckle imaging of flowing blood: A numerical study.
Phys. Rev. E 2019, 100, 033317. [CrossRef]
190. Dunn, A.K. Laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 40, 367–377. [CrossRef]
191. Chen, M.; Wen, D.; Huang, S.; Gui, S.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, J.; Li, P. Laser speckle contrast imaging of blood flow in the deep brain using
microendoscopy. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5627–5630. [CrossRef]
192. Du, Z.; Zan, T.; Li, H.; Li, Q. A study of blood flow dynamics in flap delay using the full-field laser perfusion imager. Microvasc.
Res. 2011, 82, 284–290. [CrossRef]
193. Forrester, K.R.; Stewart, C.; Tulip, J.; Leonard, C.; Bray, R.C. Comparison of laser speckle and laser Doppler perfusion imaging:
Measurement in human skin and rabbit articular tissue. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2002, 40, 687–697. [CrossRef]
194. Lin, M.-C.; Lai, W.-H.; Tien, C.-H.; Matin, M.A.; Iftekharuddin, K.M.; Awwal, A.A.S.; Márquez, A.; García Vázquez, M.
Characterization of retinal blood vessel by laser speckle correlation time constant (Conference Presentation). Proceedings of
Optics and Photonics for Information Processing X, San Diego, CA, USA, 2 November 2016.
195. Bezemer, R.; Klijn, E.; Khalilzada, M.; Lima, A.; Heger, M.; van Bommel, J.; Ince, C. Validation of near-infrared laser speckle
imaging for assessing microvascular (re)perfusion. Microvasc. Res. 2010, 79, 139–143. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
196. Nadort, A.; Kalkman, K.; van Leeuwen, T.G.; Faber, D.J. Quantitative blood flow velocity imaging using laser speckle flowmetry.
Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25258. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
197. Geng, L.; Yan, T.; Xiao, Z.; Xi, J.; Li, Y. Hatching eggs classification based on deep learning. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2017, 77,
22071–22082. [CrossRef]
198. Lecun, Y.; Bottou, L.; Bengio, Y.; Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 1998, 86,
2278–2324. [CrossRef]
199. Chen, L.; Geng, L.; Gao, Z.; Li, S.; Fu, X.; Wang, W.; Feng, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Fang, Y.; et al. An Innovative Algorithm to
Process Imaging Data for Detection of Weak Chick Embryos in Vaccine Production. In Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International
Conference on Universal Village UV2020, Bonston, MA, USA, 25 October 2020.