PUBLIC SUMMARY OF

SECOND SURVEILLANCE AUDIT (SECOND CYCLE) ON

KEDAH FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT
FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

Certificate Number : FMC 003

Date of Certification : 9 June 2010
Date of Public Summary : 16 April 2015
Audit Date : 3-6 November 2014

Certification Body:

SIRIM QAS International Sdn Bhd

Block 4, SIRIM Complex
1, Persiaran Dato’ Menteri
Section 2, P.O. Box 7035
40000 Shah Alam, Selangor
MALAYSIA
Tel : 60-3-5544 6400/5544 6448
Fax : 60-3-5544 6763
E-mail : radziah@sirim.my

Page 1 of 33
Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 3

2. GENERAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Name of FMU .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Contact Person and Address ............................................................................................... 3
2.3 General Background on the Kedah FMU ............................................................................ 4
2.4 Date First Certified ................................................................................................................ 4
2.5 Location of the FMU (Latitude and Longitude) ................................................................... 4
2.6 Forest Management System ................................................................................................. 4
2.7 Annual Allowable Cut/ Annual Harvest under the Forest Management Plan .................. 4
2.8 Environmental and Socioeconomic Contexts .................................................................... 4

3. CERTIFICATION AUDIT PROCESS .............................................................................................. 5

3.1 Audit Date ............................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Audit Team ............................................................................................................................. 5
3.3 Standard Used ....................................................................................................................... 5
3.4 Stakeholder Consultations ................................................................................................... 5
3.5 Audit Process......................................................................................................................... 5

4. SUMMARY OF AUDIT FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 6

5 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................. - 23 -

Attachment 1 Map of Kedah FMU .................................................................................................. - 24 -

Attachment 2 Surveillance Audit Plan ........................................................................................... - 25 -

Attachment 3 Details of Non conformities and Opportunities for improvement Raised during
this Surveillance and Corrective Actions Taken .......................................................................... - 27 -

Attachment 4 Status of Non conformities and Opportunities for improvement Raised During
the Previous Audit ........................................................................................................................... - 30 -

Page 2 of 33
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SIRIM QAS International Sdn Bhd (SIRIM QAS International) is the oldest and leading certification,
inspection and testing body in Malaysia. SIRIM QAS International provides a comprehensive range of
certification, inspection and testing services which are carried out in accordance with internationally
recognized standards. Attestation of this fact is the accreditation of the various certification and
testing services by leading national and international accreditation and recognition bodies such as the
Department of Standards Malaysia (STANDARDS MALAYSIA), the United Kingdom Accreditation
Services (UKAS), the International Automotive Task Force (IATF), and the Secretariat of the United
Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCC).

This surveillance audit on the Kedah Forest Management Unit (hereafter referred as ‘Kedah FMU’)
was conducted on 3-6 November 2014. It was conducted by a three-member team comprising Mr.
Khairul Najwan Ahmad Jahari (Forester and as Audit Team Leader), Prof. Mohd Basri Hamzah
(Forester) and Mr. Razman Salim (Forester). This was the second surveillance audit being conducted
following the first surveillance audit which was conducted on 30 September – 3 October 2013. The
scope of this surveillance audit was limited to the forest management system and practices of the
natural forest within the Kedah FMU.

This surveillance audit was conducted to assess the continued compliance on the overall
management system and practices of the Kedah FMU against the requirements of the new standard
for forest management certification, the Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management
Certification (Natural Forest) [MC&I (Natural Forest)] using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular
Malaysia. In addition, this surveillance audit was conducted to verify the corrective actions taken by
the Kedah State Forestry Department (KSFD) in addressing the Non Conformity Reports (Non
conformities) and Opportunity for Improvements (Opportunities for improvement) raised during the
previous re-certification audit.

Based on the findings of this surveillance audit, it was found that the Kedah FMU has continue to
complied with the requirements of the MC&I (Natural Forest). However, this surveillance audit has
resulted in the issuance of four (4) minor Non Conformity Reports (Non conformities) and two (2)
Opportunity for Improvements (Opportunities for improvement).

This public certification summary contains general information on the Kedah FMU, the audit process
involved, the findings of the audit, Non conformities raised as well as the decision on the continued
certification of the FMU under the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS) by the Certification
Panel of SIRIM QAS International.

2. GENERAL SUMMARY

2.1 Name of FMU

Kedah Forest Management Unit

2.2 Contact Person and Address

Kedah FMU is managed by the Director of the Kedah State Forestry Department who is also the
contact person. The details of the contact persons are as shown below:

Name : YM Ku Azmi bin Ku Aman

Designation : Director
Address : Kedah State Forestry Department
Level 8, Bangunan Sultan Abdul Halim
Jalan Sultan Badlishah
05000 Alor Setar
KEDAH
Phone : 04 733 3911,
Fax : 04 731 0610

Page 3 of 33
2.3 General Background on the Kedah FMU

The Kedah FMU is managed by the KSFD. At the end of 2012, the FMU comprised 300,046
hectares (ha) of Permanent Reserved Forest (PRF) or 33% of the State’s total land area of 942,600
ha. In addition, nine (9) forest areas of 35,567 ha had been proposed for gazettement as PRF. A
map of the Kedah FMU showing the locations of the PRF is attached in Attachment 1.

The KSFD are committed through sufficient management of the FMU on a sustainable basis. The
PRF within the FMU comprises mainly of inland Dipterocarp forests covering an area of 300,845 ha
while the remaining 6,201 ha consist of mangrove forests. The administration of the FMU is divided
into three forest districts namely the North, Central and South Kedah Forest Districts.

The inland forest was still being managed under a Selective Management System (SMS) on a 30-
year rotation period. Under the Ninth Malaysia Plan (2006-2010), the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC)
for the FMU had been set at 2,340 ha. A Forest Management Plan (FMP) covering the period from
2006 to 2015 had been presented during the audit.

2.4 Date First Certified

9 June 2010

2.5 Location of the FMU (Latitude and Longitude)

The FMU is located between 6º 14’ 48.8034” N, 101º19’59.5914”E and 4º33”0.3584”N, 102º39’55.728”
E.

2.6 Forest Management System

The inland forest are managed under a Selective Management System (SMS) on a 30-year rotation
period.

2.7 Annual Allowable Cut/ Annual Harvest under the Forest Management Plan

The annual allowable cut (AAC) for 2014 as stated in the Forest Management Plan [FMP (2006-2015)]
was 2,850 ha.

2.8 Environmental and Socioeconomic Contexts

A report ‘Macro Environmental Impact Assessment of Proposed Forest Operations in Kedah’ has been
completed in 2009. The FMP had also raised environmental issues in forest management particularly
on measures to mitigate potential environmental impacts during harvesting through proper road
construction. The EIA had specified that logging practices should be guided by Guidelines on
Reduced Impact Logging 2003 and the approved harvesting plan. All sensitive areas such as those
above 1000 meters, slopes exceeding 400, and riparian buffers had been demarcated as protection
areas. In addition the FMU has been demarcated into forest functional classes to ensure that the
conservation and management of the forest resources are undertaken in a planned and systematic
manner.

As recorded in the previous audit all the primary elements were included in the current FMP (2006-
2015); which included management objectives, forest resources and classification, land use and
socioeconomic conditions, management system adopted, provision for AAC, forest growth and
dynamics, record of ERT species, forest resource maps showing protected areas, management

Page 4 of 33
activities and land ownership and harvesting techniques and equipment’s used. The salient contents
and their implementation were well understood by the forest managers and copies of the documents
were available in all forest districts. All forest management activities in the FMU are centered on the
current FMU. The FMP for 2016-2025 is being planned. Possible table of contents have been
suggested and the tender process initiated (Letter: PHNK 94-2003/(13), 21 July 2014).

On indigenous peoples’ right, it was found that the Orang Asli community in the Hulu Perak/Baling had
continued to settle on the Orang Asli Reserve covering an area of 428 acres which was gazetted in
1958. There was no recorded civil court case pertaining to legal or customary tenure or use rights
within the PRF. The KSFD had not used the Orang Asli Reserve land. There was no record on the
delegation of control with free, prior and informed consent by the Orang Asli. Although the customary
rights of the Orang Asli within the PRF had not been formally recognised, these rights are respected in
forest management planning and implementation. In general, the Orang Asli communities are allowed
to continue using the forest produces for their subsistence needs.

3. CERTIFICATION AUDIT PROCESS

3.1 Audit Date

3-6 November 2014.

3.2 Audit Team

Mr. Khairul Najwan Ahmad Jahari (Audit Team Leader)

Prof. Mohd Basri Hamzah (Forester)
Mohd Razman Salim (Forester)

3.3 Standard Used

Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification (Natural Forest) [MC&I (Natural
Forest)].

3.4 Stakeholder Consultations

A stakeholder consultation was conducted in September 2014 for a period of one month. There was
no comment received from any of the stakeholders.

3.5 Audit Process

The audit was conducted primarily to evaluate the level of continued compliance of the KSFD’s current
documentation and field practices in forest management with the detailed of the SOPs listed in the
MC&I (Natural Forest), using the verifiers stipulated for Peninsular Malaysia. The coverage of the
audit on the FMU is depicted in the surveillance audit plan which is attached in Attachment 2.

For each Indicator, the auditors had conducted either a documentation review, consultation with the
relevant personnel of the FMU or stakeholders or field audit or a combination of these methods.
Depending on the compliance with the verifiers for a particular indicator, the auditors then decided on
the degree of the overall compliance in the indicator and decided whether or not to issue a major or
minor NCR or an OFI.

An NCR raised during this surveillance audit is categorized as either major or minor as follows:

Page 5 of 33
 (i) A major NCR is a non-compliance deemed by the Auditor to be critical and is likely to result in an
immediate hazard to the quality or standard of forest management system and practices in the
FMU.

The KSFD is requested to notify SIRIM QAS International of the proposed corrective actions
taken within two weeks from the last date of this surveillance audit. The corrective actions as
notified by the KSFD shall be verified by the Audit Team Leader or a member of the audit team
within one month from the last date of audit.

(ii) A minor NCR is a single observed lapse in compliance by the FMU to the MC&I (Natural Forest).

The KSFD shall respond in writing to SIRIM QAS International within one month from the last
date of audit detailing the actions to be taken to address all minor Non conformities. The
effectiveness of the resulting actions taken by the FMU must be verified at the next surveillance
visit.

(iii) An OFI is a situation where the auditor has noted an area of concern on the capability of the
forest management system to achieve conformance to the requirements of the MC&I (Natural
Forest) but without sufficient objective evidence to support non-conformity. The closing of an OFI
shall be made during the next surveillance audit.

4. SUMMARY OF AUDIT FINDINGS

4.1 The general findings of the audit on the compliance of the KSFD against the principles and
criteria of the MC&I (Natural Forest) are as follows:

PRINCIPLE STRENGTH WEAKNESS

Principle 1: Compliance Forest officers at the federal level, state level No negative findings found during
with Laws and Principles and at the district level had demonstrated an this audit
understanding and were found to be
Forest management shall knowledgeable on the applicable, state and
comply with all applicable local laws as well as the regulatory
laws of Malaysia and framework.
respect international
treaties and agreements to The KSFD officers met, from District Forest
which Malaysia is a Officers and above, generally showed
signatory, and comply with awareness, working knowledge and
all the Principles and understanding of federal, state and local laws
Criteria contained in this and of the regulatory framework related to
standard. forest management.

Records of violations were inspected at the

head office of the KSFD in Alor Setar and
found to be adequate

List of all fees, royalties and taxes, including

other charges, during document verification
at the KSFD head office in Alor Setar. were
made available during the audit. The new
rate was applied since 3rd August 2014.

Copies of receipts seen during document

verification at the KSFD (Lejar Akaun) in Alor
Setar were kept in order.

The forest managers were aware of all the

binding international agreements and their
main intentions on forest management.
Copies of these documents were made

Page 6 of 33
 available in the State Forestry Department
head office. Copies of International
agreements which Malaysia is signatory
were made available to the senior forest
managers. Interview with Silviculture
Assistant Director (Penolong Pengarah) and
Enforcement shows their awareness was
improved.

There was no record of conflicts between

Principles and Criteria with local laws and
regulations pertaining to forest management
including those relevant to the Kedah FMU.

The FMU managers are committed to

participate in resolving such conflict
(between Principles and Criteria and local
laws and regulations) if any such case
arises.

FMU is legally protected by the provisions in

the National Forestry Act 1984 Section 7 to
Section 13.

The enforcement planning schedule

(perancangan aktiviti penguatkuasaan) for
monitoring activities on all the licenced
areas, checking station, road block, factories
was conducted by monthly basis.

The maintenance of forest reserves

boundaries was conducted accordingly

Policies and statements of commitment to

manage forest resources on a sustainable
basis are clearly stated in the National
Forestry Policy 1984 that had been adopted
by the Kedah SFD.
Principle 2: Tenure and Under the Federal Constitution, land is still No negative findings found during
Use Rights and under the jurisdiction of the State the audit
Responsibilities government, which had gazetted the areas of
PRF under the National Forestry
Long-Term tenure and use (Amendment) Act 1993 and protected within
right to the land and forest this legal provision. All 35 Forest Reserves
resources shall be clearly have been gazetted. A copy of the gazetted
defined, documented and records were available in the Register of
legally established Reserves. It was observed that in 2014, the
following forest areas were in the process of
being gazetted as PRF:

 Bukit Genting Iboi

 Bukit Kemunting
 Bukit Keramat
 Bukit Kerong
 Bukit Payong
 Bukit Siong
 Ulu Muda Tambahan
 Terenas Tambahan

Page 7 of 33
 The legal use rights of the logging
contractors on the PRFs were still as spelt
out clearly in the concession agreements,
forest harvesting licenses, entry permits,
road permits and use permits issued by the
KSFD.

There were still records or map showing the

location of the only Orang Asli village (Kg
Orang Asli Lubuk Legong) located outside
the Ulu Muda Forest Reserve (FR)

Forest managers had continued to

demonstrate their willingness to support all
legally established mechanisms on land
claims. The existing cases of encroachment
had been handled according to the laws. So
far there was no record of any legally
recognized land claims from the local
communities living within the vicinity of the
PRF.

As there was no recorded claim on the FMU

by local communities, there was therefore no
contractual agreement entered into with free,
prior and informed consent of the local
communities on legal or customary tenure or
use rights for use of land. The Orang Asli
Reserve is located outside Ulu Muda FR.
The compartments adjacent to this FR have
been classified as Education Forests and
thus cannot be logged.

Forest managers had continued to

recognise, respect and collaborate with
holders of duly recognised legal or
customary tenure or use rights.

The mechanisms to resolve disputes over

tenure and use rights, were still in place at
various levels through the “Mesyuarat
Jawatankuasa Tanah Negeri Kedah Darul
Aman” which brings the issues to the State
Government or through meetings between
the “Jabatan Kemajuan Orang Asli” (JAKOA)
or the Department of Orang Asli
Advancement Kelantan and Terengganu and
the KSFD. It was also still possible to submit
the complaints to the District Forest Office
which then would forward it to the State
Forestry Office and then submitted to the
Chief Minister’s office.
Principle 3: Indigenous Records of customary rights of aborigine’s No negative findings found during
Peoples’ Rights lands under the Aboriginal Peoples Act, 1954 this audit
were available.
The legal and customary
rights of indigenous The compartments adjacent to Reserve
peoples to own, use and namely Compartments 14, 15, 16 and 17 has
manage their lands, been classified as Education Forests and
territories, and resources thus is not logged.

Page 8 of 33
shall be recognised and
respected. There were no land dispute or land claim by
native received and recorded and it was
confirmed during the audit the mechanism to
recognised and respected this was
established and will be implemented
accordingly if the issues been raised in future

Orang Asli communities (native) living near

to the forest area parameter had been
allowed to use the forest produces for their
subsistence needs. Previous consultation
with Orang Asli communities in Kg. Lubuk
Legong showed that the villagers were
allowed to harvest non-timber forest produce
for subsistence needs.

Forest management practices of KSFD does

not threaten or diminish, either directly or
indirectly, the resources or tenure rights of
the Orang Asli. In addition the compartments
adjacent to community namely
Compartments 14, 15, 16 and 17 has been
classified as Education Forests and is not
logged. Thus, the issue of prevention and
mitigation of adverse impacts does not arise.
Principle 4: Community The KSFD had continued to give preference 1) During site review, auditor
Relation and Worker’s to the local community for employment. In found that fire extinguisher was
Right the Rimba Teloi PRF, it was found that most made available at the Changlun,
of the contractor’s workers were the local Pahau and Langkawi Range
Forest management villagers (Kg. Siput, Kg. Balang). Similarly, in Office. However during site
operations shall maintain the Bkt Perangin PRF, 12 of the 15 workers review at the Pahau Range, one
or enhance the long term were the local Malay villagers. of fire extinguisher was not re-
social and economic well- inspected and one of iodine
being of local communities Workers and staff were still being given bottle in the first aid medical box
and forest workers sufficient training held mainly in the was expired. Thus, an OFI
Department’s own training facility in the Indicator 4.2.3 was raised by
Jeniang Forest Range. Among training auditor.
areas covered included
establishment/tagging/maintenance of forest
boundaries, river buffers, and protection,
road and seed trees.

During a visit to an active logging site in

Compartment 16 & 41 of the Gunung Bongsu
PRF and Compartment 8 (Block 3), Bukit
Perangin PRF, it was found that proper
safety procedures were still in place and
personal protective equipment (PPE) was in
good working conditions.

The forest nursery in the Gurun Forest

Range, North Kedah Forest District, was
inspected by the auditor. The nursery
operations, stock, storage and handling of
poisons and fertilizers were found to have
been satisfactory done in accordance with
the SOP.

A proper signage on safety had been erected

Page 9 of 33
at the places for keeping equipment, fuel
store and generator set. The place for
keeping equipment was also found to be well
maintained and properly sealed.

Based on consultations held with the

harvesting workers at the logging sites in
Compartments 16 & 41, of the Gunung
Bongsu PRF and Compartment 8 (Block 3),
of the Bukit Perangin PRF, it was found that
they were still aware on the need for using
PPE during work.

Briefings had continued to be conducted for

all the workers on various aspects of forest
management including safety.

Employees of KSFD were still members of

CUEPACS, the public sector employees
union. The supporting staffs of KSFD had
remained as members of Kesatuan Pegawai-
Pegawai Hutan Melayu Semenanjung
Malaysia. There was still no union among the
forest workers hired by the contractors.

The following documents were still being

made available during the audit:
 International Labour Organization (ILO)
Convention No. 87 – The Freedom of
Association and Protection of the Right
to Organize Convention, 1948 – Articles
2, 3, 5 & 11.
 Federal Constitution of Malaysia – Article
10 (Freedom of speech, assembly &
association.
 Employment Act, 1955
 Industrial Relations Act, 1967.
 Trade Unions Act, 1959 (Act 262)

The employees of the KSFD had continued

their collective bargaining through the union
of government employees, CUEPACS.
Employees of the KSFD were assured of
their contributions to EPF. The monthly paid
employees of the contractor’s had continued
to contribute to EPF and SOCSO and
covered by group insurance.

The KSFD had continued to use the same

procedures to address grievances faced by
the staff of the KSFD.

The contract workers with the harvesting

contractors were still being covered by the
Employment Act and their grievances were
still being channeled to their employers.
Within the Department, the Majlis Bersama

Page 10 of 33
 Jabatan (MBJ) meetings still dealt with the
grievances and conflict resolution.

Forest operations had continued to benefit

the local communities living near the FMU.
In the Kedah Tengah Forest District, the
Rimba Teloi PRF had continued to contribute
to the economy of the local communities and
had been an important source of domestic
water. The villagers had also collected non-
timber products such as petai and keranji
with permits. The KSFD had also engaged
them as contractors in the construction and
maintenance of forest recreational areas.

They had also benefited from the work

employment in forest-based activities, and
for some, facilitated access to their orchards
and farms through forest roads. The
communities had also agreed that forest
operations had not destabilized their daily
life.

There were provisions within the national

legal frameworks to prevent loss or damage
affecting the local people in Articles 8 and
Article 13 of the Federal Constitution of
Malaysia.

There was no evidence that local people’s

legal and customary rights, property,
resources or livelihoods had been
threatened.

As indicated in indicator 2.3.1, there were

appropriate mechanisms for conflict
resolution involving the local communities.

Appropriate compensations would be made

by logging contractors to the local
communities when their properties suffered
damages or losses during forestry activities.

There was still no record on any loss or

damage affecting the local communities’
legal or customary rights, property,
resources, or their livelihoods, caused by
forest operations. Hence, the issue of fair
and equitable compensation does not arise.

Principle 5: Benefits The FMU had continued to be managed During the inspection on active
from the Forest based on the principle of economic viability. logging sites in Compartment 8
The development budget for 2014 totaled (Block 3), Bukit Perangin PRF, it
Forest management RM 2,680,070 which had been spent on was found that in the process of
operations shall activities including human resource, clearing re-entry, feeder road
encourage the efficient community forest, state park, high value leading to the logging area, road
use of the forest’s multiple forest plantation, conservation and side trees had been
products and services to protection, publicity, forest resources and indiscriminately bulldozed aside
ensure economic viability infrastructure. Meanwhile, overall forest and felled into standing stands.

Page 11 of 33
and a wide range of revenue up to September 2014 totaled RM The road cleaning process was
environmental and social 24,952,227. Total staff in 2014 for the KSFD notably not in compliance with the
benefits. was 370 distributed over the three forest SOP in the verifier stated above.
districts. There were 10 professionals. The indiscriminate clearing also
caused extensive damage to
The economic viability in FMU management standing trees in the peripheral
was being ensured by the adoption of stand. Thus, a minor NCR MBH-2
sustainable management of the SMS with on Indicator 5.3.1 was raised.
the implementation of the annual allowable
cut (AAC) as prescribed in the Forest
Management Plan (FMU) (2006-2015). The
AAC for 2014 was 2,850 ha. The practice of
Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) which had
continued to be implement had further
ensured the forest productive capacity and
its ecological integrity.

Another key activity for ensuring

sustainability had been adequate
regeneration of the post-harvest stand. Post-
F inventories were prescribed under the
MUS to identify follow-up silvicultural
treatments, where necessary, to ensure
sufficient regeneration for the next cut.

The KSFD had a good record on forest

management in optimizing use of forest
resources. This was demonstrated in the
efficient implementation of the SMS and the
practice of RIL, an integrated approach that
optimizes the use of timber resources with
minimal wastage.

Forest operations in the FMU had shown

little evidence of wastage as in the post-F
compartments which were visited in the Ulu
Muda PRF. There were no logs left in closed
“matau” and the felled trees were extracted
with no usable logs left behind.

Training had continued to be conducted on a

regular basis. The training plan was being
implemented. The training had covered
various aspects ranging from forest
mensuration, wood and tree identification
and reduced impact logging.

The KFSD has fostered a diversified

economy based on NFTP which mainly
involved the local community. The collection
of these products had been adequately
regulated through issuance of passes that
ensures the ecological health of the forest is
not in any way affected.

Based on resource sustainability and

environmental integrity the system postulates
that the rate of harvest of forest products,
particularly that of timber from the FMU, shall
not exceed the level of volume replacement

Page 12 of 33
 thus ensuring perpetual resource
sustainability and environmental
conservation. Principle guidelines had been
strictly followed, in particular the AAC which
prescribes a total harvest areas of 14,250 ha
over the 10-year period of the FMP, as set by
the FDPM in Kuala Lumpur.

Principle 6: A report ‘Macro Environmental Impact 1) The implementation of

Environmental Impact Assessment of Proposed Forest Operations harvesting procedures to
in Kedah’ has been completed in 2009. The protect the soil from
Forest management shall FMP had also raised environmental issues in compaction by harvesting
conserve biological forest management particularly on measures machinery and erosion during
diversity and its associated to mitigate potential environmental impacts harvesting operations was not
values, water resources, during harvesting through proper road comply with the specifications
soils and unique and construction. The EIA had specified that of the guidelines; Garis
fragile ecosystems and logging practices should be guided by Panduan Jalan Hutan 2010
landscapes, and, by so Guidelines on Reduced Impact Logging 2003 (Guidelines for Forest Roads
doing, maintain the and the approved harvesting plan. All 2010) pindaan 2013 –
ecological functions and sensitive areas such as those above 1000 perenggan 2.6.10.3
the integrity of the forest. meters, slopes exceeding 400, and riparian Harungan. During the
buffers had been demarcated as protection inspection of Compartment 8
areas. In addition the FMU has been (Block 3) Bukit Perangin PFR,
demarcated into forest functional classes to under license no KU 01-07-
ensure that the conservation and 2014, it was found that the
management of the forest resources are crossings of two streams
undertaken in a planned and systematic were not stabilized according
manner. to road specification. Thus, a
Minor NCR KN-2 Indicator
The need to establish High Conservation 6.5.1 was raised by auditor.
Value Forests (HCVFs) and zoning were 2) During the inspection of
emphasized. Mitigation measures that were Compartment 8 (Block 3)
prescribed in the EIA study should be Bukit Perangin PRF, under
incorporated in the revision of the FMP. license no KU 01-07-2014,
Listing of ERT’s for flora is based on IUCN the implementation of
List of Protected Fauna and Red List of guidelines for forest road
Protected Flora (FRIM). layout and construction,
including log landings and
A listing of endemic and rare flora species drainage requirement under
had been included in the FMP. A list of Garis Panduan Jalan Hutan
protected fauna as also had been made 2010 (Guidelines for Forest
available. Currently there was no ERT flora Roads 2010) pindaan 2013 -
and fauna since Surveillance 1 in 2013 audit Jadual 10 Spesifikasi Lorong
until Surveillance 2 audit in 2014. Penarik; Perenggan 2.6.9.1-
parit tepian jalan was not
A safeguard to protect endangered, rare and followed. There was an (i)
threatened (ERT) species of forest flora and additional branches at the
fauna has been embedded under the FMP. skid trails 4/1 and 1/1 were
The FMU has been classified in to forest added without approval from
functional classes which include zoning into District Forest Officer, (ii)
protection forest classes such as watershed construction of mataus (log
forests, virgin jungle reserves (VJR) and landing) at Feeder Road 5
wildlife reserves. There were 14 VJRs in the was not according to
FMU with the largest being 620 ha and the approved harvesting plans
smallest having an extent of 51 ha. In (RPH), and (iii) side drain was
addition, High Conservation Value Forests generally obliterated in the
has been established and there is potential process of road maintenance
for establishing new HCVFs for protecting to improve access following
ERTs if such areas were identified. In heavy rain period. Therefore,
production forests within the FMU, only trees a Minor NCR KN-1 Indicator

Page 13 of 33
which are above the cutting limit and that are 6.5.3 was raised by auditor.
tagged are allowed to be removed. 3) The implementation of
guidelines for conservation of
Fruit trees that are important to fauna have buffer strips along streams
been protected. This was evident in the and rivers; Perenggan 2.5.2 –
inspection of Compartment 16 & 41, Gunung Jalan sedia ada was not
Bongsu PRF and Compartment 8 (Block 3), followed. The auditor
Bukit Perangin PRF. It was found that inspected the active logging
Tualang trees has been marked for site in Compartment 8 (Block
protection and has not been felled. The 3) of Bukit Perangin PRF in
residual stand within this compartment was North Kedah Forest District
also found to be in good condition and is under contract license KU 01-
expected to recover within the cutting cycle. 07-2014. The old feeder road
Tualang had been classified as protected was generally reused for the
species in KSFD. KSFD not allowed any current operation to minimize
harvesting operation on this tree species. earthwork. However, a
portion of the road, built over
The Orang Asli and local community had 30 years ago when provision
been allowed to use the forest produces for for buffer zone was not in
their subsistence needs. Orang Asli place, was now situated
communities were allowed to harvest non- within a buffer. The contractor
timber forest produce, to fish and to hunt for appeared unaware of
subsistence needs. Consultations with significance of this situation
contract workers at in Compartment 16 & 41, when the old
Gunung Bongsu PRF and Compartment 8 SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-13a
(Block 3), Bukit Perangin PRF showed that Issue 1 Rev 1 - 25 - feeder
they were aware of endangered, rare and road was cleaned for reuse
threatened species of forest flora and fauna as skid trail (LP 4/5). Thus, a
found in the FMU. They indicated that they Minor NCR MBH-1 Indicator
do not hunt any fauna and there was no sign 6.5.4 was raised by auditor.
of fauna caught. There was no workers An active area in Bukit
camp (kongsi) at in Compartment 16 & 41, Perangin PRF (Compartment
Gunung Bongsu PRF and Compartment 8 8, License No.KU.01-07-2014
(Block 3), Bukit Perangin PRF. Therefore, (BALAK)) were audited. The
posters on endangered, rare and threatened cutting girth limits for
species of forest flora and fauna were dipterocarps was 60 cm and
displayed at the SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-13a for non-dipterocarps 50 cm.
Issue 1 Rev 1 - 22 - Pahau Checking Tagged trees for felling were
Station only. Briefing on endangered, rare recorded in the harvest area
and threatened species has been conducted (e.g. KBW2095, Keruing,
to contractors and their field workers before 80cm; KBW2157, Merpauh,
hand over the harvesting license. Sign 80cm; KBB2096, Keruing, 78
boards prohibiting hunting and encroachment cm; KBW2155, Nyatoh,
into forest reserves were displayed at the 95cm; KBW2055, Kelat,
boundaries of forest reserves. This was 56cm; KBW2057, Kasai
evident during the visit to Gunung Raya PRF. [fallen]; [Tag missing],
Medang, 65cm). Despite a
Local villagers interviewed were well aware few missing tags, and
of the protection on wildlife (interviews in Kg. ‘ingrown’ tags, which were
Gulau and Kg. Charok Tenang, Kedah replaced, tagging was
Tengah District). This was conveyed through conducted according to
periodic briefings given by departmental staff specification.
to the local community (e.g. Kg Gulau, 4) The storage and handling of
Kedah Tengah). poisons and fertilizers in the
Gurun Forest Nursery (Jamel
The three volumes of Forest Manual 2003 b. Mohd Noor and Othman b.
[Manual Perhutanan: Jilid I – Pentadbiran, Abdullah), Kedah Utara
Jilid II – Operasi Hutan, Jilid III – Forest District, were found
Pembangunan Hutan] “Panduan Penubuhan satisfactory and in
dan Penyelenggaraan Kawasan-kawasan accordance with SOP.

Page 14 of 33
Hutan Dara, 1987 [Guidelines for the However, an OFI Indicator
Establishment and Maintenance of Virgin 6.7.1 was raised by auditor
Jungle Reserves, 1987] and “Garis Panduan due to record of disposal of
Kriteria Pemilihan dan Prosedur Penandaan empty pesticides containers
Pokok Ibu, 1997 [Guidelines on Criteria for was not available and waste
the Selection and Procedures for Marking container was not appropriate
Mother Trees (1997)]” has continued to be including label of scheduled
used as guidance for conservation of waste at the Gurun Range.
genetic, species and ecosystem diversity.

Under the Selective Management System

(SMS) which has continued to be practiced
within the FMU, harvesting is selectively
carried on marked trees above specified
diameter while retaining sufficient residual
vegetation in the forest. The system of
limiting harvesting to a block of a limited size
further assisted in preventing fragmentation
of the forest thus allowing animals to move to
adjacent unlogged forest sequentially and
able to return when logging has been
completed. Connectivity among forest
vegetation was mainly achieved through
proper planning of the harvesting sequence.
The riparian buffers with undisturbed
vegetation could also serve as corridors for
fauna movement between unlogged forests.
The riparian buffers have been clearly
demarcated in the harvesting plan and the
implementation has been verified during the
site review in Compartment 8 (Block 3), Bukit
Perangin PRF.

Maintaining the diversity of species/species

groups is required under the SMS. This can
be monitored by comparing pre-felling and
post-felling inventory data. Document on the
analysis of post F and pre-F was available.
Detailed pre-F and post F data for 9
compartments were compiled. The internal
review had SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-13a Issue 1
Rev 1 - 23 - reported that the analysis was
correct and could be used.

A review with the state silviculturist has

indicated the previous analysis was done
correctly. The new analysis on an additional
set of 9 compartments was found to be
correct. The report of the analysis showed
that there were differences in the number
trees between pre-F and post-F. The FMU
has interpreted and elaborated the changes
between pre-F and post-F data to assess the
changes in stocking and species
composition.

As example for Compartment 47, Gunung

Bongsu PRF with 61 ha, the FMU found that
residual stock was enough for next rotation
harvesting. To further improve the residual

Page 15 of 33
condition, specific silviculturist treatment
such as cutting lianas (CL) will need to be
applied to this area. When compared pre-F
and postF, 113 Dipterocarp trees was
decreased to 65 trees. Although number of
Dipterocarp trees was decreased,
Dipterocarp trees was still dominance in the
area.

Based the above analysis and result, a Minor

NCR SAM 1 for Indicator 6.3.1 which had
been raised in Surveillance 1, 2013 was
satisfactorily closed.

The FMU conduct post-harvest inventories to

assess regeneration capacity of the residual
stand and to prescribe necessary treatments.
A summary of inventory results for the FMU
in 2012 were seen by the auditor. A total of
926,94 ha were inventoried covering Koh
Moi, Ulu Muda, Sungai Badak, Gunung
Bongsu and Rimba Teloi. Following analysis
of inventory data, follow-up forest treatments
were recommended

Representative areas of existing forest

ecosystems have been embedded under the
FMP. The FMU has been classified into
forest functional classes which include
zoning into protection forest classes such as
watershed forests, virgin jungle reserves and
wildlife reserves. In addition, High
Conservation Value Forests has been
established. There were 14 VJRs in the FMU
with the largest being 620 ha and the
smallest having an extent of 51 ha.

The availability of harvesting procedures to

protect the soil from compaction by
harvesting machinery and erosion during
harvesting operations can be referred to;
a) Guidelines for Forest Roads 2010
(Amendment 2013) b) Guidelines for
Reduced Impact Logging in Peninsular
Malaysia 2003.

During the inspection of active logging site, it

was found that the construction of the main
bridge on the access road leading to the
active logging site in Compartment 8 (Block
3) Bukit Perangin PRF was found followed
forest road specification. A road constructed
adjacent to the bridge leading to the river will
have to be blocked to prevent soil being
washed into the river. The implementation of
harvesting procedures to protect the soil from
compaction by harvesting machinery and
erosion during harvesting operations was
adequately implemented and adhere to the
requirements of the Guidelines for Forest

Page 16 of 33
Road 2013. Therefore, a Minor NCR SAM-2
Indicator 6.5.1 which has been raised in
Surveillance 1, 2013 was satisfactorily
closed.

The requirement for clearly demarcated and

protected riparian buffer strips has been
emphasized in the RIL guidelines and
followed by the KSFD. The guidelines specify
the width and marking of the boundary trees
within the buffer. The KSFD clearly
demarcated these buffer strips along the
streams.

The policy on environmentally friendly non-

chemical methods of pest management at
Kedah can be found in the FMP as well in
the public summary.

The policy on poison handling and

management was available. Information on
chemical handling was included in the 2014
report on the Gurun Nursery. Proper Safe
clothing and method of chemical application
was prominently displayed on stand-alone
bill board. Similar information, including
occupational/health hazards of
chemicals/poisons, were also framed and
hung on store walls. Storage facilities
(separately for chemicals, fertilizers,
equipment’s and fuel) and chemical mixing
area were inspected. Only approved
chemicals were used.

Records of storage and movement for

poisons (only Class 4 being handled), as well
as fertilizers were found to be current and in
order. An entry on chemical use in the log
book stated for 30 September 2014, the
latest entry, 30 ml of insecticide was used
with 970 ml remaining.

Stock taking was conducted monthly and

monitored by the headquarters in Alor Star
(Letter: PHRSPG, 2 October 2014).
Training on the handling of chemicals for the
KSFD’s staff has been planned and
implemented. Records indicated that a
“Kursus Pengendalian Bahan Kimia” was
conducted in 18-19 May 2014.

It was observed that chemicals have not

been widely used in the forest operations
except for paints, fuel and lubricant oil. Only
a small quantity of Class III chemicals has
been used in the preparation of
SQAS/MSC/FOR/30-13a Issue 1 Rev 1 - 26 -
seedlings in the nurseries.

Page 17 of 33
There is a policy on recycling which was
established in 2007, was and are still being
adhered to. Major repair works had been
conducted outside the FMU and there was
no store for spare parts in addition,
contractor did not constructed any logging
camp in the licensed area. It has been
confirmed with the contractors during the site
visit at active logging sites in Compartment
16 & 41 Gunung Basor PRF and
Compartment 8 (Block 3) Bukit Perangin
PRF.

There were no containers for non-organic

wastes being used in the harvesting sites.
Fuel was mainly transported into the area to
be used by the machinery.

KSFD had established standard operating

procedures on waste disposal and re-cycling
of liquid and solid non-organic wastes and
records of disposal of containers, liquid and
solid non-organic wastes, including fuel and
oil for Kedah FMU on 01 August 2014.
Therefore, a Minor NCR Indicator 6.7.1
which had been raised during Surveillance 1
audit in 2013 was satisfactorily closed.

There has been no application of biological

control agents in the FMU.

There was no documentation of exotic plant

and animal species as these species have
not been utilized in large scale. KSFD had
used native species in enrichment planting at
Block 1 &2, Compartment 10, Koh Moi PRF
in October 2014 for an area about 20 ha.
Dipterocarpus boudii (Keruing bulu) and
Shorea curtisii (Meranti seraya) were among
native tree species that had been used by
KSFD

There was no conversion of natural forest to

forest plantations since last year Surveillance
1 audit until this year Surveillance 2 audit.

Page 18 of 33
Principle 7: Management As reported in the previous audit, all primary No negative findings found during
Plan elements had been included in the FMP this audit
(2006-2015); such as management
A management plan – objectives, forest resources and
appropriate to the scale classification, land use and socio-economic
and intensity of the conditions, management system, provision
operations – shall be for AAC, forest growth and dynamics, record
written, implemented, and of ERT species, forest resource maps
kept up to date. The long showing protected areas, management
term objectives of activities and land ownership and harvesting
management, and the techniques and equipment’s used.
means of achieving them,
shall be clearly stated The salient contents and their
implementation had been well understood by
the forest managers and copies of the FMP
were made available in all the district forest
offices. The FMP for 2016-2025 was being
planned.
All monitoring records, including new
information, would be used to develop the
new management plan for the period 2016-
2025.

The KSFD had conducted training at the

Pusat Latihan Perhutanan Jeniang. Annual
training program for 2014 was made
available.

The staff training records and certificates

awarded to the participants were verified.

A summary of the primary elements of the

FMP (2006-2015) was made public through
the departmental webpage as given below
(kedahforestry.gov.my). The public can
readily access the internet to obtain key
information on the conduct of the FMU
including management programmes, growth
plot data, ERT species list, permanent
reserve forests and their classification and
forest production;

http://www.kedforestry.gov.my/index.php/my/
maklumat-pengenalan/mc-i/ringkasan-
rancangan-pengurusan-hutan.html

http://www.kedforestry.gov.my/index.php/my/
maklumat-pengenalan/mc-i/maklumat-petak-
tumbesaran-growth-plots.html

http://www.kedforestry.gov.my/index.php/my/
maklumat-pengenalan/info-asas/senarai-
spesies-ert.html

http://www.kedforestry.gov.my/index.php/my/
maklumat-pengenalan/mc-i/kawasan-hutan-
simpan-negeri-kedah/pelan-pengelasan-
hutan-simpan.html

http://www.kedforestry.gov.my/index.php/my/
maklumat-pengenalan/mc-
i/pengusahasilan.html
Page 19 of 33
Principle 8: Monitoring KSFD has complied with the regulatory
and Assessment monitoring procedures in accordance with No negative findings found during
relevant federal and state guidelines of the this audit
Monitoring shall be Forestry Departments and other relevant
conducted – appropriate to agencies.
the scale and intensity of
forest management – to Director General’s Directive on the use of
assess the condition of the monitoring forms A – D, [A: Infrastruktur
forest, yields of forest (Infrastructure), B: Pengusahasilan Hutan
products, chain of custody, (Forest Harvesting), C: Alam Sekitar
management activities and (Environment), D: Pengeluaran (Output)] was
their social and made available in ISO Quality Procedure
environmental impacts. “Aktiviti-aktiviti Pengusahasilan Hutan”.
These forms were still being used to monitor
the health and condition of the forest.

The forest managers had continued to

identify and implement appropriate
monitoring procedures, in accordance with
the scale and intensity of the forest
management operations, for assessing
social, ecological, environmental and
economic impacts.

During the previous audit, a preliminary draft

of procedures to monitor social, ecological,
environmental and economic impacts was
prepared by the Forestry Department
Headquarters. However, the draft has yet to
be discussed and approved for use by the
KSFD. An OFI #2 was therefore raised.
KSFD had finally agreed to use the form
beginning on 12 October 2014. Therefore
OFI #2 had satisfactorily been addressed
and closed out.

Monitoring on socio-economic impact had

continued to be conducted in both forest
districts still using the same social impact
assessment form entitled “Maklumat Kajian
Impak Sosial Dalam Sektor Pembalakan”

KSFD has gathered the relevant information,

appropriate to the scale and intensity of the
forest management operations, needed to
monitor the items (a) to (e) listed in Criterion
8.2. The KSFD had included the research
and data collection needed to monitor, at a
minimum, the following indicators:

a) Yield of all forest products harvested.

b) Growth rates, regeneration and condition
of the forest.
c) Composition and observed changes in the
fauna.
d) Environmental and social impacts of
harvesting and other operations.
e) Costs, productivity and efficiency of forest
management

Page 20 of 33
All the information could be viewed by the
public on the website link:
http://kedforestry.gov.my/index.php?lang=en

During the previous audit, results of analysis

of growth and yield plots/ growth plots/
continuous forest inventory (CFI) plots was
not presented. Therefore an OFI #3 was
raised.

The KSFD had gathered growth data from a

growth plot in the Virgin Jungle Reserve
(VJR) at Compartment 13, Gunung Jerai
PRF on 14-20 June 2013 and 24-25 January
2014. The data was analysed with the
assistance of the Forest Department
Headquarters, Kuala Lumpur. The results of
analysis of growth and yield plots/ growth
plots/continuous forest inventory (CFI) plots
was made available during this surveillance.
Therefore an OFI #3 raised on indicator 8.2.1
during the previous surveillance had been
satisfactorily addressed and therefore closed
out.

All trees above the cutting limit and selected

for felling were still being tagged. Tagging
records were being kept by the KSFD and a
copy made available at the nearest forest
checking stations (FCS) to allow chain of
custody monitoring and ensure that only
tagged trees were removed. The information
in the tagging record was inspected against
field assessment of tagged trees in both
active logging sites in Compartments 16 and
41 of the Gunung Bongsu PRF.

Records on logged removed from removal

passes issued by the in Pahau FCS was
found to be in order with tagging records. It
was observed that the forest officer in charge
at the FCS was competent in doing his work.

During the previous audit, it was found that

the KSFD had decided to prepare a new
FMP 2016-2025 instead of doing a mid-term
review. However, the results and findings of
the monitoring activities had not been
included in the list of contents for the new
FMP. This was raised as an OFI #4.

The Forestry Department Headquarters had

received quotation from consultants for
preparing a new FMP (2016-2025). An
official letter from the Forestry Department
Headquarters dated on 18 September 2014
was verifed where the KSFD was informed
that the FMP would be ready in 2015. This
has adequately addressed OFI #4 and
therefore, this OFI was closed out.

Page 21 of 33
 During the previous audit, it was found that a
summary of the results of monitoring
indicators, including those listed in Criterion
8.2, was not made available to the public. A
minor NCR KN-2 was therefore raised on this
lapse.

A summary of the results of monitoring

indicators, including those listed in Criterion
8.2, was made available to the public. All the
information could be viewed by public
through this website link:
http://kedforestry.gov.my/index.php?lang=en
The action taken by the KSFD had
adequately addressed the minor NCR KN-2
and therefore it has been closed out.

Principle 9: Maintenance There was no new establishment of HCVF No negative findings found during
of High Conservation site in 2014 since the last recording of this audit
Value Forest Koompassia excelsa (Tualang) stand in
Compartment 36 of the Pedu PRF. The
Management activities in KSFD had continued to follow the guidelines
high conservation value in identifying the presence of HCVF sites
forests shall maintain or with consultation of the relevant
enhance the attributes stakeholders.
which define such forests.
Decisions regarding high These measures on HCVFs, as contained in
conservation value forests the FMP, can be publicly accessed at;
shall always be considered http://www.kedforestry.gov.my/index.php/my/
in the context of a maklumat-pengenalan/mc-i/kawasan-hutan-
precautionary approach. pemeliharaan-tinggi. html
During the previous surveillance, it was
found that the results and findings of the
HCVFs monitoring activities had not been
included into the implementation and revision
of the FMP. A mid-term review on the FMP
(2006-2015) would not be conducted but
efforts were being undertaken to prepare a
new one for the period 2016-2025. The
requirement of this indicator has not been
considered to be included in the list of
contents for the new management plan. This
was raised as OFI #5.

The KSFD would include in the new FMP all

results and findings of the HCVFs monitoring
activities including records on new areas.
The auditor was informed that the Forestry
Department Headquarters had received
quotations for the preparation of a new FMP
and was in the process of selecting the
consultant. The action taken by the KSFD
had adequately addressed OFI 5 and
therefore it has been closed out.

Page 22 of 33
4.2 Based on the findings of this surveillance audit, it was found that the KSFD had continued to
manage the Kedah FMU in compliance with most of the requirements of the MC&I (Natural
Forest). This surveillance audit had resulted in the issuance of four (4) minor Non conformities
and two (2) Opportunities for improvement. The details on the Non conformities and
Opportunities for improvement raised are as shown in Attachment 3.

4.3 The audit team had also verified the corrective actions taken by the KSFD to address the 4
minor Non conformities and 5 Opportunities for improvement which were raised during the
previous surveillance and closed them out. The details on the verification of the corrective
actions taken and the status of the Non conformities and Opportunities for improvement are
shown in Attachment 4.

4.4 With regard to Criterion 6.10, there was no conversion of the natural forest to forest plantations.

5 RECOMMENDATIONS

The KSFD had submitted its proposed corrective actions to address the minor Non conformities and
Opportunities for improvement which had been reviewed and accepted by the audit team. However,
these corrective actions shall be verified by the audit team during the next surveillance.

As all Non conformities and Opportunities for improvement raised during the previous surveillance
had been closed out and there was no new major NCR being raised, the Audit Team Leader, after
consultation with members of the audit team recommend that the certification of Kedah FMU against
the MC&I (Natural Forest) be maintained.

Page - 23 - of 33
Attachment 1 Map of Kedah FMU

Page - 24 - of 33
 Attachment 2 Surveillance Audit Plan

PROGRAM
DAY TIME
AUDITOR 1 & 3 AUDITOR (2)
Day 0 Travelling from KL to Alor Star

Briefing by Audit Team Leader on the surveillance audit plan

Check in at Hotel Holiday Villa Alor Star

Day 1 9.30 am – 1.00 pm • Opening Meeting with representatives of FMU

• Briefing session by Forest Manager of the FMU on progress of

forest activities

• Q&A Session

a.pm – 5.30 pm
• Evaluation of changes to the management of the FMU
• Check on progress of planned activities aimed at enhancing the
operation system to achieve improvement in overall
performance
• Check on complaints, stakeholder comments and follow-up
actions o Orang Asli o Government agencies
o NGOs

• Check on verification for closing NCRs raised during the previous

audit
• Evaluate on procedures for internal audit
• Evaluate on management review system
• Documentation and records review Principle 1-9

• Review of Day 1 Findings by Audit Team Leader Travel to

Hotel Park Avenue, Sg Petani

Site visit to Kedah Selatan – Site visit to Kedah Tengah – Sg

Day 2 Kulim Petani

7.00 am – 1.00 pm • Active area – Compt 16 & 14 • Active area - Compartment

Gunung Bongsu FR 83B Rimba Teloi FR
• Forest Checking Station - • Forest Checking Station –
• Local community – JKKK BPH Pahau
• Nursery – store Jeniang and • Documentation and records
Gurun review at Pahau Office
Range

Page - 25 - of 33
 Briefing to representatives of FMU on the progress of audit
2.00 pm – 5.30pm
Review of Day 2 Findings by Audit Team Leader

Stay at Hotel Holiday Villa, Alor Setar

Day 3 Site Visit to Kedah Utara District

7.00 am – 5.30pm Active area – Compt 8 Bukit Perangin PRF

Interview with forest workers

Documentation and records review at District Office

Site visit – boundaries at Gunung Raya PFR

Review of Day 3 Findings by Audit Team Leader

8.30 am – 1.00 pm Documentation and records review

Day 4

2.00pm-4.00 pm Preparation of audit report and finding

Briefing to representatives of FMU on the findings of audit

4.30pm Closing Meeting and presentation of findings of audit and

discussion on follow-up activities

Adjourn Closing Meeting

Page - 26 - of 33
 Attachment 3 Details of Non conformities and Opportunities for improvement Raised
during this Surveillance and Corrective Actions Taken

Specification Detail Non-conformances Corrective Action Taken Verification by

Indicator Major/Minor/ Assessor
OFI
Indicator Minor The implementation of Stop work order had been A Letter
6.5.3 NCR # guidelines for the forest road issued. The contractor had PHD.KU.139/282/(
KN-1 layout and construction, repaired the road and side 26) dated 12
including log landings and drain. The licensee was November 2014
drainage requirements were ordered to request an was verified
found to be inadequate. Skid approval from the DFO
trails and mataus were regarding the construction of
constructed not in mataus and additional skid
accordance to the approved trails.
harvesting plan (RPH).
Refresher training to the
During an inspection in contractor’s workers was
Compartment 8 (Block 3) of planned to be conducted.
the Bukit Perangin PFR,
under logging licence no KU KSFD would conduct training
01-07-2014, the following to all contractors on new
non-compliances was requirements of (Guidelines
observed: for Forest Roads 2010)
Revised 2013.
1. An additional branch to the
skid trails 4/1 and 1/1 was
added without approval
from District Forest Officer.
2. Construction of mataus
(log landing) at Feeder
Road 5 not according to
approved harvesting plans
(RPH).
3. Side drain was generally
obliterated in the process
of road maintenance to
improve access after
heavy rain period.

Indicator Minor Availability and Stop work order has been Letter
6.5.4 NCR #MBH-1 implementation of guidelines issued to the contractor. PHD.KU.139/282/(
for conservation of buffer 23) dated 9
strips along streams and The old feeder road was November 2014
rivers. Perenggan 2.5.2 – restored by planting with was verified
Jalan sedia ada. commercial species.

The conservation of buffer- Refresher training was

zone had not been conducted to the contractor’s.
adequately implemented.
KSFD would conduct training
The auditor had inspected an to all contractors on new
active logging site in requirements of Guidelines
Compartment 8 (Block 3) of for Forest Roads 2010)

Page - 27 - of 33
 the Bukit Perangin PFR in Revised 2013
North Kedah Forest District
under logging license KU.01-
07-2014 (BALAK).

An old feeder road had been

reused for the current
operation to minimize
earthwork. However, a
portion of the road, built over
30 years ago when provision
for buffer zone was not in
place, was now situated
within a buffer zone. The
contractor appeared unaware
of significance of this situation
when the old feeder road was
cleaned for reuse as skid trail
(LP 4/5).
Indicator Minor Guidelines for reduced/low Stop work order had been Letter
5.3.1 NCR #:MBH-2 impact logging to minimize issued to the contractor. The PHD.KU.139/282/(
damage to residual stand had road cleaning activities had 26) dated 12
not been followed. been stopped until an November 2014
approval is from the DFO was verified
The auditor had inspected an
active logging site in
Compartment 8 (Block 3) of
the Bukit Perangin PFR in
North Kedah Forest District
under logging license KU.01-
07-2014 (BALAK). In the
process of clearing re-entry,
feeder road leading to the
logging area road side trees
had been indiscriminately
bulldozed aside and felled
into standing stands. The
road cleaning process was
notably not in compliance
with the SOP in the verifier
stated above. The
indiscriminate clearing had
also caused extensive
damage to standing trees in
the peripheral stand.

Indicator Minor Implementation of harvesting The licensee was instructed A Letter

6.5.1 NCR #:KN-2 procedures to protect the soil to repair the crossing with PHD.KU.139/282/(
from erosion during 15m gravel from the streams. 23) dated 9
harvesting operations were November 2014
not followed. Refresher training was was verified.
conducted for the contractors.
During the inspection of
Compartment 8 (Block 3) KSFD would conduct training
Bukit Perangin FR, under to all contractors on the new
license no KU 01-07-2014, it requirements of the
was found that the crossings Guidelines for Forest Roads
of two streams were not 2010 (Revised 2013)
stabilized according to road
specifications.

Page - 28 - of 33
Indicator OFI #1 1) Fire extinguishers were
4.2.3 made available at the
Changlun and Langkawi
Range Offices. However,
the auditor had found that
one of fire extinguishers
had not been re-inspected.
2) First aid box was made
available at the Pahau
Range. However, auditor
had found that one of
iodine bottle in the first aid
medical box had expired.

Indicator OFI # 2 1) At Gurun Range Office,

6.7.1 empty pesticides
containers which had been
thoroughly washed and
holed. However, proper
waste container was not
appropriate including
correct labelling for each
type of scheduled waste
could be enhance by
management.
2) Gurun Range Office had
also disposed empty
pesticides containers
through the public waste
collecting facility.
However, record of
disposal of containers was
not available during site
review.

Page - 29 - of 33
 Attachment 4 Status of Non conformities and Opportunities for improvement Raised
During the Previous Audit

Specification Detail Non-conformances Corrective Action Taken Verification by

Indicator Major/Minor/ Assessor
OFI
Indicator Minor The analysis on changes of A comparative analysis A review with the
6.3.1 NCR #: forest stand/species composition between Inventory Pre-F State Silviculturist
SAM-1 in relation to the pre-felling and Post-F inventory of has indicated the
inventories was not adequate. compartment 47C, previous analysis
Gunung Bongsu PFR was was done correctly.
Document on the analysis of conducted. From the The new analysis on
post F and pre-F inventory was results of the analysis it an additional set of 9
available. Detailed pre-F and was found that the area compartments was
post F data for 10 compartments has sufficient stocking for found to be correct.
was compiled. Preliminary the future and that The report on the
analysis to assess changes of climbers cutting (CL) analysis showed that
stocking and species would be required. In there were
composition was conducted by addition, it was also found differences in the
the KSFD. The comparative that there would be no number trees
analysis was found to be species extinctions but between pre-F and
inadequate as it did not provide only a reduction on the post-F. The KSFD
any elaboration on the results number of residual trees. has interpreted and
and subsequent measures. A elaborated the
more comprehensive analysis changes between
needs to be carried out to pre-F and post-F data
assess the changes in stocking to assess the
and species. During the previous changes in stocking
recertification audit (2012), an and species
OFI was issued for this indicator. composition.

As an example, for
Compartment 47,
Gunung Bongsu PRF
with 61 ha, it was
found that residual
stock was enough for
next rotation
harvesting. To further
improve the residual
condition, specific
silviculture treatment
such as cutting lianas
(CL) would need to
be done in this
compartment.

Status: Closed out.

Indicator Minor The implementation of The construction of the During the inspection
6.5.1 NCR #: harvesting procedures to protect main bridge in the of an active logging
SAM-2 the soil from compaction by driveway leading to the site, it was found that
harvesting machinery and compartment 71-A of the the construction of
erosion during harvesting Ulu Muda PRF had been the main bridge on
operations had not fully adhered improved to prevent the the access road
to the requirements of the soil erosion into the river leading to the active
Guidelines for Forest Road 2010 system. Among the logging site in
(Revised 2913). improvements being Compartment 8
carried out were by (Block 3) of the Bukit
The main bridge on the access binding the timber bridge Perangin PRF had

Page - 30 - of 33
 road leading to the active with steel cables to followed the forest
logging site in Compartment 71- minimize wood chips and road specifications.
A Ulu Muda PRF was found to soil being washed into the A road constructed
be damaged and measures river. The "Geotextile" adjacent to the bridge
taken to prevent soil from being cover had also been leading to the river
washed into the river had not placed on the beam before would have to be
been adequate. It was found that it was covered by laterite blocked to prevent
the retaining walls had been soil to prevent sediment soil being washed
damaged and covered with soil falling into watercourses. into the river. The
washed down from heavy rains. implementation of
Sumps were filled and needs to The "retaining wall" had harvesting
be maintained. A road also been improved in procedures to protect
constructed adjacent to the order to prevent soil from the soil from
bridge leading to the river will being washed into the compaction by
have to be blocked to prevent river. In addition, legume harvesting machinery
soil from being washed into the seeds were also sown and erosion during
river. around the area to prevent harvesting operations
erosion. The work was still had been adequate
in progress due to the and adhered to the
rainy season. requirements of the
Guidelines for Forest
Road 2010 (Revised
2013).

Status: Closed out.

Indicator Minor Standard operating procedures The KSFD was to adopt KSFD had
6.7.1 NCR #: on waste disposal and re-cycling the Environmental Quality established standard
KN-1 of liquid and solid non-organic (Scheduled Wastes) operating procedures
wastes and records of disposal Regulations 2005, the on waste disposal
of containers, liquid and solid Environmental Quality Act and re-cycling of
non-organic wastes, including (1974) for the disposal of liquid and solid non-
fuel and oil were not available. waste oil, fuel, liquid and organic wastes and
solid. records of disposal of
containers, liquid and
A letter had been sent to solid non-organic
the Forestry Department wastes, including fuel
Headquarters Peninsular and oil.
Malaysia regarding on
Standard Operating Status: Closed out.
Procedures.

Indicator Minor A summary of the results of i. KSFD had received All the information
8.5.1 NCR #: monitoring indicators, including from the Forestry could be viewed by
KN-2 those listed in Criterion 8.2, was Department public through this
not made available to the public. Headquarters website link:
Peninsular Malaysian http://kedforestry.gov.
The Public summary did not on the format and my/index.php?lang=e
include the research and data content to be included n
collection needed to monitor, at in the Forest
a minimum, the Management Plan
following indicators:- (FMP) for the 2016- Status: Closed out.
a) Yield of all forest products 2025.
harvested. ii. A discussion was held
b) Growth rates, regeneration with the IPPSM on 19
and condition of the forest. September 2013 to
c) Composition and observed discuss on the
changes in the fauna. preparation of the FMP
d) Environmental and social including public
impacts of harvesting and other summary.
operations.

Page - 31 - of 33
 e) Costs, productivity and
efficiency of forest management

Indicator OFI 1 Forest managers were found to The KSFD had up-
1.1.2 be fully aware of some of the dated the checklist of
federal and local laws directly the applicable
related to forestry. However, the federal, state, local
particular provision/checklist of laws, regulations and
the applicable federal, state, policies, in particular
local laws and regulations and those related to forest
policies, in particular those management.
related to forest management
needs to be improved. Status: Closed Out.

Indicator OFI 2 A preliminary draft of procedures KSFD had agreed to

8.1.2 to monitor social, ecological, use the standard
environmental and economic form to monitor
impacts was provided by the social, ecological,
Forestry Department environmental and
Headquarters. Peninsular economic impacts
Malaysia. However, the draft has which was provided
yet to be discussed and by the Forestry
approved for application to Department
KSFD. Headquarters
Peninsular Malaysia.
The survey form was
officially used on 12
October 2014.

Status: Closed out.

Indicator OFI 3 Results of analysis of growth The KSFD had
8.2.1 and yield plots/ growth plots/ gathered growth data
continuous forest inventory (CFI) from a growth plot in
plots was not presented during the Virgin Jungle
audit Reserve (VJR) at
Compartment 13,
Gunung Jerai PRF on
14-20 June 2013 and
24-25 January 2014.
The data was
analysed with the
assistance of the
Forest Department
Headquarters, Kuala
Lumpur. The results
of analysis of growth
and yield plots/
growth
plots/continuous
forest inventory (CFI)
plots was made
available during this
surveillance.

Status: Closed out.

Indicator OFI 4 The KSFD decided to conduct a The Forestry

8.4.1 new FMP 2016-2025 instead of Department
a mid-term review. However the Headquarters had

Page - 32 - of 33
 results and finding of the received quotation
monitoring activities was not from consultants for
included in the in the list of preparing a new FMP
contents for the new (2016-2025). An
management plan. official letter from the
Forestry Department
Headquarters dated
on 18 September
2014 was verifed
where the KSFD was
informed that the
FMP would be ready
in 2015.

Status: Closed out.

Indicator OFI 5 It was found that the results and The KSFD would
9.4.2 findings of the HCVFs include in the new
monitoring activities has not FMP all results and
been included into the findings of the
implementation and revision of HCVFs monitoring
the forest management plan. A activities including
mid-term review for the Forest records on new
Management Plan 2006-2015 areas. The auditor
would not be conducted but was informed that the
efforts are being undertaken to Forestry Department
develop a new management Headquarters had
plan for the period 2016-2025. received quotations
The requirement of this indicator for the preparation of
has not been considered to be a new FMP and was
included in the list of contents for in the process of
the new management plan. selecting the
consultant.

Page - 33 - of 33