Design Sizing and Implementation of A PV
Design Sizing and Implementation of A PV
Design Sizing and Implementation of A PV
Abstract— This paper aims to design size and implement a Photo Voltaic system (PV system) for powering a living room.
The required load to be powered by the PV system is completely determined. A comparison between using normal and power
saving loads is carried out. The power saving loads is chosen to reduce the overall cost of the required system. The proposed
PV system for powering the predetermined load is introduced. Each part of the system is designed and sized based on the
load requirement. Finally, the practical implementation for the overall PV system for powering the required load is done.
The implemented system works in an efficient way.
I. INTRODUCTION
Recent researches focus on renewable energy recourses [1, 2]. This is because the already existed energy sources, which
mainly based on fuel, are going to run out [3, 4]. There are many types of renewable energy resources [1]. Solar energy is
considered the most attractive renewable energy source. This is because it is mainly the source of all other energy sources. In
addition it gives higher output power comparing with other renewable energy sources [5, 6]. The main objective of this paper
is to use the Photo – Voltaic (PV) system as a renewable energy source instead of the existed energy sources which based on
fuel for powering a certain load. The system has to be implemented efficiently to satisfy the load requirements. Thus the load
has to be firstly determined. A comparison between normal load and power saving loads is carried out. The power saving
loads is chosen to reduce the overall cost of the PV system. The design sizing for each part of the required PV system is
presented based on the load requirements. Each part of the PV system is tested practically to check its functionality. Finally the
overall PV system is implemented to power the required load.
The daily energy consumption for a certain load, Wattage * Hours used per day, is calculated as follow [8]:
(1)
The contribution in this paper is to use smart (power saving loads) loads instead of normal loads. Normal loads consume
much more power comparing to the power saving loads. Thus by using the power saving loads, the required power reduces.
As a result, the overall cost of the required PV system reduces. The system design and sizing are based on calculations.
Page | 64
International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) ISSN: [2395-6992] [Vol-3, Issue-5, May- 2017]
TABLE 1
SOME APPLIANCES AND LOADS WITH ITS POWER CONSUMPTION
APPLIANCE HOURS IN USE KWH USED MONTHS USED ANNUAL KWH
Computer - Desktop with
90 8 12 96
Monitor
Computer - Laptop 60 1 12 12
Fan – Bath 15 1 12 12
Fan - Ceiling (does not incl.
150 12 6 72
lights)
Fan - Table / Box / Floor 71 11 3 33
Lighting - Incandescent, 100
100 10 12 120
watts
Lighting - CFL, 25 watts 100 1 12 12
Television - 27 inch, LCD flat
150 18 12 216
screen
Television - 15-27 inch,
150 18 12 216
standard
Table (2) shows the difference between using power saving loads and normal loads required for a living room, the used case
study. Such loads are assumed to be used for 10 hours per day. The power calculations based on equation (1).
TABLE 2
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POWER SAVING &NORMAL LOADS IN LIVING ROOM
Used Load Power saving loads power Normal Load power
(Assume each used 10 hours per day) Watt Watt-hour/day Watt Watt-hour/day
Lighting 4 40 36 360
TV 19” 22 220 80 800
Fan 45 450 60 600
Total 71 W 710 W.H/D 176 W 1760 W.H/D
From table 2, it is obvious that the normal loads require power ten times more than the required power for the power saving
loads. Thus the overall cost of the PV system using the power saving loads is predicted to be reduced.
FIGURE 1: THE FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED PV SYSTEM FOR POWERING BOTH AC
AND DC LOADS
Page | 65
International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) ISSN: [2395-6992] [Vol-3, Issue-5, May- 2017]
Loads consumption must be determined to be able to determine the specification of PV system components. The loads
consumption is determined for the living room utilities. PV system has high power dissipation through its components. Thus
a safety margin has to be taking into consideration is the system design [9]. The following calculations show a comparison
between the load consumption using normal loads and power saving. This consumption based on powering the main
requirements of the living room and the lighting for both the bathroom and the kitchen, one TV, one fan, three light bulbs.
The system is designed to power the required loads for 5 hours per day.
One 70W LED television 19” used 5 hours per day 70*5 = 350 Wh
Three-100W light Bulb used 5 hours per day: 3*100*5 = 1500 Wh=1.5KWh
One 100W Desktop with Monitor used 5 hours per day: 100*5=500Wh
One 22W LED television 19” used 5 hours per day 22*5 = 110 Wh
Four -4W light Bulb used 5 hours per day: 4*4*5 = 80Wh
From this calculation, it is obvious that the normal loads consume much more power than the power saving loads. These
calculations confirm that using power saving loads reduces the overall cost of the PV system. As it reduces the overall
required daily power consumption, it requires less number of solar panel. Also, the requirements of the system components
reduce.
Thus the total power consumed by the required loads is 590Wh/day. The system is design to deliver 650 Wh/day as a safety
margin for the design.
In this paper, the living room is to be implemented using power saving loads. From loads calculations, the power from the
solar panel must be calculated using the following rule [10]:
(2)
The number of solar panels used varies based on the load requirements. To size the panels, to determine the required number
of panels to be used with its required power, the total peak watt produced must be calculated. The peak watt (W p) [11]
produced depends on size of the PV module and climate of site location. In KSA, it enjoys sunshine all the year. In system
design, six hours of sunshine all over the day is assumed. Thus, each watt peak (Wp) of solar panel would therefore deliver
6Wh/day. Thus the required power from the solar panel is calculated using equation 2.
The daily energy loads consumption is 650 Wh. The hours of usable sunlight during day is assumed to be 6 hours. Thus the
required output power from the solar panel is 109W. Thus a 120W solar panel is used as a safety margin for the design.
Page | 66
International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) ISSN: [2395-6992] [Vol-3, Issue-5, May- 2017]
The charge controller is used in PV system for controlling charging and discharging operation of battery from solar panels.
The main objective of charge controller is to regulate the charge to the batteries and preventing any overcharging. When the
battery becomes full the charge controller disconnects it from panels [9].
The input power from panels to charge controller is calculating using equation 3, assuming the worst case efficiency of
charge controller equals to 85%:
(3)
The charge controller rating is calculated by dividing its input power by the maximum voltage of the used solar panel. The
maximum voltage of the solar panel is 18V [12]. Thus the rating of the charge controller to be used for the PV system is
7.88A. It is designed to be 10A, 12V as a safety margin for the design.
3.4 Batteries
The battery is used to store the generated energy from the solar panel and deliver it to the load [9]. There are many types of
the battery [13]. The dry battery is the type which is used in this paper. It is most common used because it has a long lifetime
and it is good in maintenance.
The capacity of battery is measure in ampere-hours (Ah). It is calculated by using equation 4[13]:
(4)
Assume that the battery has efficiency of 85 %. To save its lifetime, it is assumed to discharging to 60 % from its value. So
the capacity of the required battery to be used in this system is calculated using equation 5.
Assuming the worst case of using 85% battery efficiency and 60% depth of discharge and 12V battery, as the total watt –
hours per day is 650W, thus the battery storage energy is calculated using equation 5. It is found to be 106Ah. A 120Ah
battery is used for design safety.
The inverter is used to convert direct current (DC) produced from panel, to alternative current (AC) that needs to power the
AC loads in home [9]. The efficiency of inverter is in the range of 90% to 95% because the power loss occurs in the
conversion process. The efficiency of inverter can be calculated by using equation 6 [13].
(6)
Assuming worst case inverter efficiency to be 90%, so the input power to the inverter coming from the charge controller is
calculated using equation 7.
(7)
The inverter power must be sufficient to handle the total amount of Watts that required by the system. The inverter size
should be 25-30% greater than the required watt for the load [13]. To size the inverter, the total power of the used load must
be calculated. It is around 118W. Thus a 150W inverter is required for design safety margin.
Thus the requirement of the PV system required to power a 650Wh/day for a living room with the lighting of a kitchen and a
bathroom are:
Page | 67
International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) ISSN: [2395-6992] [Vol-3, Issue-5, May- 2017]
One solar panel with 120W, Charge controller rated at 10A at 12V, a battery with capacity of 120Ah and 12V, Inverter with
size greater than 150W
Figure 2 shows the practical components which are used for implementing the PV system
IV. CONCLUSION
A PV system for powering a living room with the lighting of both the kitchen and the bathroom is implemented. The power
saving loads is used instead of the normal loads. It consumes less power. Thus it reduces the overall cost of the PV system.
The required load is completely determined. Each part of the PV system is designed and sized. The implemented system is
tested. It works effectively. It powers the required load for five continuous hours when light goes out.
REFERENCES
[1] Faruk Yildiz, “Potential Ambient Energy-Harvesting Sources and Techniques”, The Journal of Technology Studies, 2009
[2] S. Roundy, P. K. Wright, and J. M. Rabaey, “Energy Scavenging for Wireless Sensor Networks”, 1st ed. Boston, Massachusetts:
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003
[3] V. A. Boichenko, E. Greenbaum, and M. Seibert, Photoconversion of Solar Energy, molecular to global photosynthesis. Imperial
College Press London: 2004; p 397-452
[4] S. Bahatyrova, R. N. Frese, C. A. Siebert, J. D. Olsen, K. O. van der Werf, R. van Grondelle, R. A. Niederman, P. A. Bullough, C.
Otto, and C. N. Hunter, Nature 430, (7003), 1058-1062 (2004).
[5] Nathan S. Lewis and George Crabtree, Argonne Arthur Nozik, NU Paul Alivisatos, “Basic Research Needs for Solar Energy
Utilization”, Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on Solar Energy Utilization , UC-Berkeley, 2005
[6] Z. Fan, J. C. Ho, “Self-assembly of One-dimensional Nanomaterials for Cost-effective Photovoltaics”, International Journal of
Nanoparticles, 4, 164 (2011)
[7] “Electrical Appliance Typical Energy Consumption Table”,
http://www.chabotspace.org/assets/BillsClimateLab/Electrical%20Appliance%20Typical%20Energy%20Consumption%20Table.pdf
[8] “How to calculate domestic power consumption?”
https://dmohankumar.wordpress.com/2012/08/12/how-to-calculate-domestic-power-consumption-fact-file-24/
[9] Vince Lombardi, ed. “A Practical Guide to Solar Power System Design for Homeowners”, Version 08.08.12
[10] http://www.solartechnology.co.uk/support-centre/calculating-your-solar-requirments
[11] Hemakshi Bhoye, Gaurang Sharma, “An Analysis of One MW Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant Design”, International Journal of
Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Vol. 3, Issue 1, January 2014
[12] http://www.centsys.co.za/upload/CENTSYS%20Documentation/0_07_B_0133%20120W%20Solar%20Panel%20Specifications%20s
heet-29062015-NG.pdf
[13] B. Westover, “Difference between Dry Cells and Wet Cells”.
http://www.ehow.com/about_6360799_difference-wet-cell-dry-cell_.html#ixzz2rAxAHcmk.
[14] H. Wade,“Solar PV Design Implementation O& M” ,March 31- April 11, 2008
Page | 68