sustainability

Review
Smart Tourism Ecosystem: A New Dimension toward
Sustainable Value Co-Creation
Kamrul Hasan Bhuiyan 1 , Israt Jahan 2 , Nurul Mohammad Zayed 3 , Khan Mohammad Anwarul Islam 4 ,
Sayma Suyaiya 5 , Olena Tkachenko 6 and Vitalii Nitsenko 7,8, *

1 Department of Tourism and Hospitality Management, National University, Gazipur 1704, Bangladesh
2 Department of Marketing, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science & Technology University,
Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh
3 Department of Business Administration, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh
4 Department of Business Administration, The Millennium University, Dhaka 1217, Bangladesh
5 Department of General Educational Development, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh
6 Department of Economic Theory, Kyiv National Economics University Named after Vadym Hetman,
03057 Kyiv, Ukraine
7 Department of Entrepreneurship and Marketing, Institute of Economics and Management,
Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical Oil and Gas University, 76019 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
8 SCIRE Foundation, 00867 Warsaw, Poland
* Correspondence: vitaliinitsenko@onu.edu.ua; Tel.: +380-939983073

Abstract: Changes in information technology have a great influence on people’s preferences and
lifestyles. Smart devices and technologies have taken the conventional way of traveling into a smart
tourism system. The aim of this paper is to examine smart tourism, the integration of different
activities of different tourism service providers, and their interactions with tourists. It also finds
out the smart tourism tools, how they are being used by different actors, how the tourist and the
network perceived and interact with them for making up a smart tourism ecosystem, and finally
Citation: Bhuiyan, K.H.; Jahan, I.; how they create the sustainable value co-created services. This paper is qualitative in nature and
Zayed, N.M.; Islam, K.M.A.; Suyaiya, used a holistic approach. The data were collected through interviews of 24 service providers and
S.; Tkachenko, O.; Nitsenko, V. Smart 50 service receivers, mainly tourists from the study area, Bangladesh. Study shows that there are
Tourism Ecosystem: A New three phases by which actors are communicating with each other comprising pre-service delivery,
Dimension toward Sustainable Value during-service delivery, and post-service delivery. Smart tourism tools are being used throughout
Co-Creation. Sustainability 2022, 14, the phases which eventually create value in co-created services with three pillars of sustainability
15043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ (economic, socio-cultural and environmental). This study will contribute to the existing body of
su142215043
knowledge in the field of smart tourism, value co-creation, and sustainability.
Academic Editor: Gang Liu
Keywords: smart tourism; smart ecosystem; smart experiences; sustainability; value co-creation
Received: 16 September 2022
Accepted: 11 November 2022
Published: 14 November 2022

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral 1. Introduction

with regard to jurisdictional claims in
Our society is currently dominated by the evolution of information and communi-
published maps and institutional affil-
cation technologies. The technology basically includes information about the means, the
iations.
action on it, and amendments to it [1–3]. The purpose of technological advancement is not
only to improve services for increasing the quality of life but also to create a chain so that
the delivery of services in an efficient manner can be ensured [4–9]. ICTs help to develop
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
interactive services which help to interconnect local organizations as well as visitors for
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. access to quick service delivery. Technology depicts a significant role in terms of endorsing
This article is an open access article tourist destinations, allocating and marketing tourism as well as assisting tourists before
distributed under the terms and and during tourist’s stay in the destination [10,11]. In the context of technological ad-
conditions of the Creative Commons vancement, a new type of destination has emerged that helps to experience a new way of
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// searching and enjoying the destination which is called a smart destination. It is important
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ to provide smart destinations as well as opportunities for the co-creation of emotions so
4.0/). that tourists can experience unforgettable visits. Today’s tourists desire to be astonished by

Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215043 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 2 of 14

knowing the mysterious things of the destination and want to be informed about what to
do, what to visit and how to catch a place by using smart tools [4]. In the context of smart
tourism or smart destination, it is clear that technology assimilates global involvement
into the comprehensive destination. In this approach, tourists vigorously participate with
service benefactors and cooperate in co-creating tourists’ own involvements as well as a
sharing experience, which directly leads to innovation [12–15]. Due to the advancement
of technology especially social media advancement; emphasis on value co-creation is also
increased. Social media and augmented and virtual reality have changed the dimension of
tourism as nowadays people are experiencing their surroundings and putting a mark on
the service creation process. Furthermore, nowadays, sustainability in terms of economic,
environmental, and sociocultural, in the technology-denominated service has become
crucial [16], particularly in the tourism industry [17]. There is ample significance of sustain-
ability in the value co-creation process [18] but still, very little literature is found on the uses
of smart technologies and value co-creation. This paper aims to provide a holistic view of a
value co-creation ecosystem by examining the opportunities of implementing applications
of smart tourism tools from the perspective of the service provider and service receiver.
So, the current paper can be considered as a theoretical framework for smart tourism and
smart tourism tools for value co-creation and technology integration. However, most of
the research showed smart tourism, smart tourism ecosystem, and actors. This study aims
to find the amalgamation of smart tourism, tools, actors, and ecosystem, and how the
ecosystem contributes to sustainable value co-creation.

2. Literature Review
2.1. Smartness and Smart Tourism
Smart has turned into the popular expression to portray innovative, economic and
social advancements driven by innovations that depend on sensors, enormous information,
big data, approaches of the network, and interconnection among the technological advance-
ment that is the Internet of Things, RFID and NFC [6,19]. It is a complex amalgamation
of all the technological tools-soft smartness and hard smartness-which bridges the digital
and physical elements. Harisson et al. [20] refer to the smart as exploiting operational,
near real-time real-world data, integrating and sharing data and using complex analytics,
modeling, optimization, and visualization to make better operational decisions.
Smart Experience focuses on technology-mediated tourism experiences and their
enhancement through personalization, context awareness, and real-time monitoring [3,5].
For the sustainable tourism experience, a smart tourism ecosystem is created so that
personalized, context awareness, as well as real-time monitoring, can be ensured. According
to Neuhofer et al. [21], major drivers of the smart tourism experience are information
accumulation, ubiquitous connectedness and real time synchronization. Smart tourism
experience not only facilitates actual destination place by sharing real time contents but
also supports pre as well as post trip phases which helps to share better experiences than
before [18].
Technology appears as a propelling and important force for smart tourism. For this
purpose, the tourism industry is known as the substance of high-tech renovation that
allows easier and quicker ways of performing business, encouraging competition as well as
globalization [16]. The development of the tourism sector is related to other organizations
promoted by the use of the internet. Day by day an incredible number is noticed in terms
of online booking for tourism-related products due to the embracement of technology.
Technology facilitates better affiliation between service providers or tourist associations,
destinations, and consumers. Factors such as technological development, innovative
activities, digital spaces, information processing, smart tools, and ICT infrastructure, such
as cloud computing and the Internet of Things, are basically responsible for the creation of
smart tourism ecosystem [22].
In smart tourism, technology is seen as an infrastructure, rather than as individual
information systems, and encompasses a variety of smart computing technologies that
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 3 of 14

integrate hardware, software, and network technologies to provide real-time awareness of

the real world and advanced analytics to help people to make more intelligent decisions
about alternatives, as well as actions that will optimize business processes and business
performances [23].

2.2. Smart Tourism and Smart Tourism Ecosystem

The Smart Tourism experience is very efficient and rich in meaning where tourists are
active participants in its creation and participation. Besides their consumption, they create,
annotate and enhance the information that constitute the basis of their experience through
the posting of their photos, story with destination hashtag. Neuhofer et al. [24] found that
information aggregation ubiquitous connectedness and real time synchronization played
as a major driver of smart tourism experiences.
Smart ecosystem has been described as the relationships among the micro and macro
level stakeholders for producing tourism experiences through human organizations, tech-
nology, shared information and services and resources exchange on the basis of pre delivery,
delivery and post-delivery experiences. Murphy et al. [25] pointed out that the smart
tourism systems are intended to be dynamic networks. Formation of smart ecosystem
requires smart technology groundwork. With the help of personal technological touch
tourists can easily as well as actively contribute data by their activities, engagement, queries
and contents and these indicates most significant elements along with government, media
and residents in terms of building smart ecosystem. According to Gretzel et al. [6], smart
tourism ecosystem is a platform of creating managing and delivering touristic services
via technological advancement which leads to information sharing and value creation.
The prime elements of ecosystem are service provider and receiver, support services, tech-
nologies, plat form, NGOs, companies from other industry. The resource also classified
among actors, based on tangibility/intangibility (tools, software, infrastructure), human
resources (skill, knowledge and commitment) and the relational resources (network among
the resources) [6].

2.3. Smart Tourism and Sustainable Value Co-Creation

Today, travelers are capable of using smartphones during travel for communication,
social happenings, information attainment, information search, and amusement [2,11].
Smartphones play an important role in terms of shaping tourists’ experiences during
vacations. Tourists participate actively in terms of experience creation-uploading photos
to Instagram and Facebook with destination-related hashtags helps others to know about
unknown destinations [26]. This is the process by which potential tourists can be found and
with the help of promotional activities in order to encourage mobile applications, potential
tourists turn into actual tourists.
Value co-creation idea basically comes from the notion that consumers can play a
dominant factor in terms of the modernization process of new services and products in
order to make sure that value must be added from the consumer’s point of view. According
to Nitsenko et al. [27] and Zine et al. [28] co-creation model is basically comprised of a
provider sphere, customer sphere, and joint sphere. Value co-creation can only be possible
when direct interaction would happen between the provider and the customer [28]. Co-
creation is the mechanism by which customers’ skills are accumulated into the company’s
value creation. Customer knowledge is considered a supplementary idea resource to the
company’s internal value-creating procedure and thus it supports the company’s value
creation [26].
Consumer–company interaction has become the locus of value creation [24]. The
scope of these value-creating interactions has extended beyond the consumer and the
company, even though the value is co-created through the combined efforts of firms,
employees, customers, stockholders, government agencies, and other entities related to a
given exchange, it is always determined by the beneficiary (e.g., customers). Businesses
in fact should “create an experiential environment in which customers can have an active
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 4 of 14

dialogue and co-construct personalized experiences” [24]. Concerning technology, ICT

plays an active role, while creating value co-creation from three perspectives: pre-delivery
(from getting information to online booking), serving delivery (different applications and
applications for taking instant information and services); post-delivery (social networks or
sites to express the review with a hashtag of the destination) [22]. Day by day, consumers
depend on smart tools for tourism purposes which is increased due to the attitude and
intention of consumers concerning the use of technology [11]. Customers are very inclined
with the intention to use technologies that are smart and adaptive [9]. The motivation for
using smart tourism tools is not only limited to practical values, such as ease of use, but also
hedonic values, such as enjoyment and pleasure. Kim and Law [29] stated that enjoyment
is considered the psychological motivation for tourists to buy services through technology.
Traditionally, firms or service provider was responsible for the value-creation process
but with the passage of time new dimension has arrived due to technological advancement,
where both service provider and customers equally play the role in the creation of value [10].
The customer’s value creation process is linked with the involvement with the enclosure of
the client’s skills as well as knowledge [7].
Sustainable co-creation refers to a wide range of alternative approaches that are more
advantageous economically, socially, and environmentally involving customers [17]. The
methods of resource integration that have been identified have benefits for (1) environ-
mental; (2) social well-being (by fortifying ties with system actors); and (3) an economic
advantage (innovation because they improve their service [22]. Technology “greatly alters
organizations’ views and behaviors towards environmental sustainability” [30]. By empha-
sizing the significance of investigating both the technological and social spheres as drivers
for customer orientation to the social environment (institutions) in which ecosystems lie.
The appeal for the adoption of a systemic perspective on value co-creation, however, has
not yet been fulfilled [30].

3. Materials and Methods

A qualitative approach was chosen in consideration of its holistic nature. The current
state of smart tourism tools is analyzed through desk research, by examining the depth
phenomenon. Then, the semi-structured interview method was used in this study to collect
data, making it feasible to precisely direct the interview process in addition to interacting
and sharing ideas. The community of service providers and receivers was identified for the
interviews. Five distinct groups were taken into account in this research as the statistical
population, which in this study consisted of several groups engaged in value co-creation.
The first and second groups consisting Travel agents and tour operators, and hotels and
resorts, respectively, providing the service using smart tourism tools to the tourist. These
groups included value co-creation in the sustainability goals of their business. The third
group is comprised of the service receivers mainly tourists and guests, who looking for
ease of experience while contributing to sustainable value creation. The fourth (a) groups
encompass the government and international organization which creates the atmosphere
and acts as catalysts. The fourth (b) group consists of an international organization working
across borders to understand the more general overview. The theoretical saturation rule,
however, was used to determine the appropriateness of sampling in this study, therefore
sampling proceeded until no new pertinent data on the topic were received. A total of
24 service providers (a combination of tour operators and travel agents, hotels), 50 service
receivers mainly tourists, 1 government organization, and 2 international organizations
were interviewed. Before the interview, they were sent the questionnaire through the
mail, and then the interview was conducted. After collection, thematic qualitative analysis
methods were adopted. Firstly, the data were labeled with important data patterns. Then,
all the data were coded by segment and sub-segments. Finally, based on this, the results
were formulated.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 5 of 14

4. Results
4.1. Service Provider: Tour Operator
The tour operators and the hotel have both informal and formal relationships among
themselves but mostly formal relationships. They have to communicate with potential
tourists through different tools. The most tour operator provides their information on their
websites and they have a direct messaging system on their websites by which potential
guests can communicate with them. They have links to social media platforms, such
as Facebook and Twitter, on their websites, allowing potential tourists to access those
platforms directly. They updated all information and displayed their benefits as well as
other essential details on the social media pages. Additionally, websites have pop-up
messages to greet potential visitors.
Some tour operators have their own mobile applications, particularly Android ap-
plications that can be found in the Google Play store. Potential tourists can download
the applications on their smartphones, which feature a direct mailing system and all the
information the tour operator provides. Most of the tour operators are using different
mobile applications, such as IMO, Line, Facebook Messenger, Viber, WhatsApp, WeChat,
and Skype, to communicate with the potential service receiver. With these smart tools, they
instantly contact them and if necessary, using a video call service. In addition, some of
them use different mobile applications based on geographical location- they mostly use
WeChat for the Chinese market, Line for Japan and Thai Market, WhatsApp for Indian,
Russian, and South American markets, IMO and Viber for the Middle East, some Asian
countries and European Countries. Facebook Messenger is widely used throughout the
world, especially in Australia and North American countries except in some countries
around the world. Some tour operators provide virtual tours and 360 panorama pictures
and videos of different tourist places through their websites. Some outbound tour Oper-
ators show different places of their targeted destination where they are arranging tours
and they also use virtual reality devices to show different places to the local people who
are expecting to go for an international tour. During the time of the tour, the tourist is
given some augmented reality applications which are very limited. Few operators use the
electronic interpreter to understand tourists clearly who are non-English speakers [31–36].
In this stage, for resources integration, they were asked—with whom they are contact-
ing, whether they have formal or informal relationships and how smartly they communicate
among themselves. The majority of the tourists replied that they have a very strong for-
mal relationship with government organization and international organization and both
formal and informal relationship with hospitality industry, transportation sectors, local
organizations and host communities.
The government tourism organizations, such as the Bangladesh Tourism board, pro-
vides tour operators with information materials, such as electronic maps of Bangladesh
and different destinations delineating all the necessary information, electronic brochures
of different destinations describing brief . . . of the attractions and the services to avail
and electronic books, which includes all the details of the destinations. They also provide
information related to outbound tourism through websites and email. Most of the tour
operator said that the government organization are trying to provide all the necessary
services in a traditional way. They are very reluctant to use smart devices for communica-
tions; they have only website and email services by which they are providing necessary
information [37].
Regarding international organizations, the tour operator is exchanging information
through various smart devices. Some of the tour operators said that they are mostly com-
municating with world-renowned organizations such as Pacific Asia Travel Associations
(PATA), and International Air transport Associations (IATA) through email, and very often
they use Skype for live conversations. The minority of them are communicating through
Facebook messenger, WeChat, and other mobile applications [38].
For arranging accommodations, food and beverage, and transportation, they have both
formal and informal relationships with hotels, restaurants, and transportation companies.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 6 of 14

In the case of hotels and restaurants, majority of the tour operators’ books rooms through
booking software such as NICE, INN Board and other GDS software which are used by
different hotel. They are getting software generated discount from their enlisted hotels.
They also exchange information through different smart mobile applications, such as
Facebook messenger, IMO and WhatsApp, which are popular in Bangladesh. Some of the
tour operators uses the virtual 360 pictures and videos of hotel rooms and services which is
generated and provided by the hotels and restaurants.
Regarding the transportations, most of the tour operator are member of IATA and
have a good relation with other airlines. They get all the information through their websites
about all the updates. Most of the tour operator use Global Distribution System (GDS) for
reserving Air tickets such as Amadeus and Galileo. For local transportations, most of the
tour operator have their own vehicles but in case of high demand they have to contact with
local transport provider. Some tour operators use Uber, Pathao services for transporting
their guests to very close destinations. Most importantly, almost all of the tour operators
said that they are somehow dependent on Google Maps.
They were asked whether they are using smart tools for communicating and exchang-
ing information and resources with local organizations and host communities. Most of the
tour operators replied that they are using very few smart devices for communicating but
only mobile phone communications especially in very remote areas.
In terms of sustainability, while co-creating service, the travel agents and tour op-
erators coined the uses of smart tourism tools to plummet the use of paper and pencil,
reducing the time as they can communicate with potential and existing tourists and with
their employees promptly. The tour operator can access the required information about
destinations, different facilities provided by the government and concerned authorities,
and insights about upcoming events, rules, and regulations [39]. The following is a quote
by a participant-
“We mostly employ interactive applications to engage with our current and future
tourists, which eliminates the majority of our paper-based work and increases
our efficiency by shortening the turnaround time. Our business organization can
provide us with immediate information regarding destinations and governmental
facilities” (Participant 5).
Some of the tour operators expressed they can reduce marketing costs using social
media communications. Few others coined that they can reduce environmental damage by
getting instant advice from trade bodies, environmental organizations, and the government.
“We get instant information about a destination’s probable hazard, any upcoming
environmental catastrophe, and any action taken by the government by using
smart devices. And we can also disseminate the information to our tourists”
(Participant 3).

Service Provider: Hotels

The collaborations and resources exchange of hotels with other actors such as tour
operators, transportation companies, government and local authorities, local and interna-
tional organizations and the host communities as other service providers and the tourist as
the service receiver are performed through different smart tourism tools [40–44]. Regarding
guests and potential guests, they were asked what are the smart tools tour operator are
using to attract the potential tourist and how they are serving them in a smart way. All of
them replied that they are providing their information through websites and they have
direct messaging system in their websites by which potential guests can communicate with
them. Direct booking systems are available in their websites and the relevant information
regarding the room types and the fair and others facilities. Most of the hotels have a virtual
tour of the hotel facilities in their websites where potential guest can visualize the hotels
standard and the services. A hyperlink of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter are
also available in their websites through which the potential tourist can directly go their
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 7 of 14

social media pages. In the social media pages, they updated all information and activities
and the positive reviews about their property. Pop up message of social media to welcome
the guest are enhance the guest communications.
During the service, all hotels provide their guests with a simple, automated process
of IoT devices containing thousands of devices and sensors from rooms to public areas.
Most of the hotels are using smart thermostat sensors, which can monitor and respond to
fluctuations in occupancy. Some of the hotels have their own applications for providing
smart services which are given to them at check in time. Smart occupancy notifications
are given to the hotel front office and the guest can order anything and can call the room
attendants any time through this smart applications. Guest can also take personalized
services by providing notifications through hotel generated applications. Most of the hotel
have smart plastic key cards and some hotels offers guest room access via smartphone
applications. Only a few five-star hotels have mobile applications for checking into the
hotel. In the rooms, some of the hotels have smart electronic system where all the electronic
appliances work with sensor from water supply to smart TV. Some hotels have the smart
parking system through sensor applications for reserving parking spots. At the end of
the guest’s stay, travelers can self-checkout through the smart applications and transfer
money through cards. All of the properties are managing PMS (property management
system) software for managing all the resources, staff, and points of sales. International
chain properties are using Opera and the local properties using NICE and Inn board
PMS software.
Regarding the resources and information sharing with the tour operators, the hotel prop-
erty connected with them through the email and web-generated messaging system. Some of
the hotels allow enlisted tour operators to book directly and get software-generated discounts.
However, hotels are communicating with government organizations through tradi-
tional ways. They only use email communications and sometimes talk directly over the
phone. Some of the hotel’s executives said that government organizations are very reluctant
to convey smart devices to carry the resources exchange and information.
Most hotel and resort executives opine that smart device helps them to maintain
sustainability measurements while co-creating value with tourist, and tour operators. It
helps the property to maintain smoothly as they can track equipment, machinery, people,
and even guests. Smart devices help to reduce energy consumption while providing service
to the guests. Some executives said that the ai based smart devices plummet unnecessary
and overlapping tasks and help the front office to smooth operations.
“We use artificial intelligence (AI) powered smart devices on our site to minimize
task overlap. It can also assist us in keeping track of our everyday needs. Most
crucially, AI-based technology enables quick check-in and check-out for guests
without having to keep them waiting in line at the front desk” (Participants 12).

4.2. Service Receiver: Potential and Actual Tourist

In the value co-creation process the consumers have a distinct role with service
providers by using smart tourism tools. They were what sort of smart tourism tools
they usually for their travel, how they use them, how they communicate with tourism
service provider, and how they express their tour experiences. Most of the tourists replied
that they tend to adopt smart technologies if they find them useful, easy to use, as well as
compatible in performing activities, such as searching information regarding travelling,
making hotel reservations, purchasing travel related services, enhancement regarding expe-
rience the destination. With the help of smart tourism tools, consumers want to save time,
be more effective and efficient. Some tourists like to watch virtual tours before making
decisions to travel and reading tourism blogs and articles related to the destinations. Most
of the tourist like to read Trip advisor, Off Road Bangladesh, travel blogs, the travelers
reviews and some other travel news for collecting information relating to the destinations
safety security, attractiveness, food and accommodations. They also watch YouTube videos
on the targeted destinations before going there. They also go through the social media
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 8 of 14

reviews and ratings for selecting destinations, hotels and other services. For going to
restaurants, they go through the food blogs and the scores.
In the case of acquiring transportation, they were asked how they manage trans-
portation for travelling. For making outbound tours, most of the tourist purchase ticket
from travel agent and they communicate with travel agent directly. Some of the tourist
purchase air tickets online through direct airline websites. Very few tourists purchase air
ticket internet-based booking websites such as Expedia, booking bd.com and others. For
local transport some traveler uses smartphone applications such as Shohoz for reserving
bus tickets and some use online government platforms for rail tickets. For short distance
especially in the city area they also depend on smart technologies—with the help of mobile
applications such as Uber, Pathao, and Shohoz, it is easier to find out convenient trans-
portation with convenience price. Transport related applications helps to reduce bargain
hassle and gives pleasure and time saving riding. Travelers have to select destinations on
the map and then the drivers nearest to travel will show up on the map. To most of the
travelers, Uber, Patho is known as the balance of availability, cost and convenience.
During the post-tour, most tourist post their photos and status regarding the tour
experiences on social media, such as Facebook, and Instagram. They write travel blogs on
different online platforms like Trip Advisor and Off Road Bangladesh. They also like to
write in different travel Magazines such as Vroman, the tourism, and Parjaton Bichtra.
Most tourists talked positively about sustainable value co-creation through the smart
tourism ecosystem. They found it most convenient to communicate with service providers
at any time. They even chat with chatbots to get important information, which reduces the
time and hassle to visit the travel agent or tour operator to get the service and information
(some coined that time is money). They also get valuable information about the host
community, culture, and ideas, which helps them to keep the socio-cultural sustainability.
Few tourists said that they received an emergency update about a sea catastrophe.
“ . . . I purchased a package from a tour operator without visiting their office
which helped me to concentrate on my regular work. Even I contacted them at
night while watching a tv serial. It saved a lot of time. You know time is money”
(Participant 18).
“ . . . before visiting the destination, I got information about the host culture, from
the travel agent over WhatsApp. I also message destinations authority about
events, I received information instantly” (Participant 31).

5. Discussion
The service provider interacts with the service receiver and other elements of the smart
ecosystem through smart tools, which eventually create the value of co-created services.
From the results, a holistic process can be found in three different phases (Figure 1). In
each phase the users communicate with each other through smart tourism tools and make
a smart ecosystem.
In pre-service delivery, smart tools, such as mobile applications, can predominately
provide information, such as making reservations, choosing local amenities, available
packages, and ancillary services within hotels, and restaurants, finding directions, choosing
transportation, and finding out cultural heritages and its spectacular parts. Smart tourism
tools help to offer convenience with the help of user-friendly interfaces and providing up
to date information within their affordability. With the help of global distribution and a
central reservation system, web-based technologies led to the flourishing of smart tourism.
Mobile applications also create high mobility in terms of tourism information and tourism
consumers as well. In this stage, public-private collaboration is noticed which helps the
government to become more and more technology-focused which helps integration and
intelligent use of data. Service providers anticipate users’ needs based on various factors
and make recommendations for context-specific consumption activities, such as points of
interest exploration opportunities.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 9 of 14

Figure 1. Value co-creation through smart tools and Smart tourism ecosystem.

During the service delivery, mobile applications also help in terms of the service
delivery stage by providing audio guidance. Augmented reality helps a lot in terms of
service delivery as AR provides opportunities for experiencing virtual reality. In case of
a visit to the cultural heritage, AR helps to guide and offer a point of interest. Google
glass and HOLO lens by Microsoft are considered convenient and wearable smart AR tools
which help to create unique experiences for tourists while visiting cultural heritages. Smart
tourism tool NFC can be used for scanning information and translating it into their own
language or native language and this will help tourists to better understand. Navigation
not only helps to find locations but also helps to explore unexplored destinations. With the
help of IoT Service providers help to augment travelers’ on-site experiences by offering rich
information, location-based and customized services with the help of a navigation system,
and interactive services with the help of AR.
In post-service delivery, basically, smart tourism demands technology-mediated tourism
experiences and their enrichment with the help of personalization, context-responsiveness,
and real-time monitoring. With the help of a technology-embedded environment, tourists
can experience the destination which helps to increase the destination’s competitiveness.
Tourists participate actively in terms of experience creation such as by uploading pho-
tos to Instagram and Facebook with destination-related hashtags helps others to know
about unknown destinations. Service providers enable travelers to share information so
that other travelers can be benefited in the decision-making process and this also leads
revive and reinforcing travel experiences and constructing self-image on social networking
sites. In addition, service providers obtain both positive and negative insights about the
tourist experiences with them which provides them about their strengths and weaknesses.
Through smart devices, service providers can communicate, instantly, with their guests
about their bad experiences (if any) and commit to refurbishing the next experience. Addi-
tionally, in case of positive exposure, they can promote the notion and utilize in their next
marketing campaign.
Furthermore, in the value co-creation process, every actor (stakeholder) uses smart
tourism devices, while communicating with each other in three phases which creates an
ecosystem. In this ecosystem, all the actors get instant access to the information and neces-
sary to-does, which creates a multistakeholder smooth and smart working environment
where everybody is the contributor.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 10 of 14

Sustainable co-creation refers to a wide range of alternative approaches that are

more advantageous economically, socially, and environmentally involving customers [17].
However, in this study author has found that the service providers (both travel agents, tour
operators, and hotels and resorts), service receivers(tourists), and local and international
bodies benefited themselves, each other, and the community economically, socio-culturally,
and environmentally (Figure 2). The travel agent and the tour operators and hotels and
resorts are fostered by plummeting paper-based work, saving time, and maintaining long-
term relationships with the forward linkage actors. They also decrease overlapping tasks
which eventually lower their costs, increase efficiency, and help to foster economies of scale.

Figure 2. Sustainability among the value co-creation actors (author compilation).

As active actors of the ecosystem, tourists contribute to sustainable value co-creation.

They are benefited by reducing traveling cost to the backward linkage agents before the
travel start and can gain prompt access to the pull of information. They also contribute to
sustainable socio-cultural activities by understanding the community culture, ideas, norms,
and necessary particulars where and whenever they need. They are also smart tourism
ecosystem active members while contributing the environmental sustainability in the value
co-creation process. Government and international bodies play actively in the ecosystem
while maintaining sustainability.
Finally, we have found that there is a strong relationship between a smart tourism
ecosystem and sustainable value-creation (Figure 3).
The service providers (both travel agents, tour operators, and hotels and resorts),
service receivers(tourists), and local and international bodies benefited themselves, each
other, and the community economically, socio-culturally, and environmentally by forming
a sustainable value co-creation.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 11 of 14

Figure 3. Sustainable Value co-creation (author compilation).

6. Conclusions
This paper attempted to provide an overview of smart tourism, smart tourism tools,
and the smart tourism ecosystem and how all of this encompasses sustainable value-
created services. It identified three phases where different actors work together and
communicate with each other using different smart tools, such as augmented reality, Near
Field Communication, mobile applications, and digital devices. However, the coordination
and the sharing of information through the actors for sustainable value co-creation are still
in their infancy. Therefore, smart tourism initiative around the world is seeking to construct
a smart tourism ecosystem [6]. Thus, this paper somehow enhances value creation through
smart tourism tools and a smart ecosystem in a sustainable way.
While the past studies have contributed to the foundation of smart tourism concepts
and different smart tourism tools used for the connectivity of different tourism stakeholders,
our findings contributed to the holistic approach of value co-creation through smart tourism
and smart tourism ecosystems created through different actors. It provides some theoretical
contributions to the existing literature in several ways.
First, this study clarifies the smart tourism ecosystem by identifying the smart tourism
tools used by the different service providers, service receivers, and other stakeholders in
the tourism industry. The initiatives of Smart tourism around the world are searching
to build feasible smart tourism ecosystems [6] but the complexity of the systems create
this very difficult to go beyond very specific platforms-, technology- or service-specific
innovations [6]. Thus, these findings create an ecosystem of smart tourism with different
actors from the service provider and service receiver end in three different phases with very
specific smart tourism tools. Second, most literature focuses extensively on the e-tourism
comprising websites and social media [27]; this study offers insights into the dominant
tools of the smart tourism ecosystem: augmented reality, virtual reality, and different
applications facilitate the sustainable co-creation of value in the tourism industry. Thus, it
is the pioneering work that investigates service providers’ and service receiver intention to
develop co-creatively developed smart services using different smart devices and shows
that uses of smart devices are used in different phases by the same persons. Finally, this
piece of work proposes an effective ecosystem framework for academics and practitioners
that can be used for further study to understand the smart ecosystem in the different
service industries.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 12 of 14

In addition to the theoretical contribution, this paper provides a number of action-

able solutions for tourism executives with smart tourism, smart tourism ecosystem, and
value co-creation.
First, the tourism executives especially the tour operators and hotels may focus on its
innovative service receivers using different smart tourism tools, such as Augmented reality
(AR) and Virtual Reality (VR), Near Field Communication (NFC) devices different Mobile
applications, and devices and persuade them to get involved actively in smart co-created
tourism services. Second, according to the conceptualization of the study, hotel and tour
managers can better utilize mobile technologies, smartphone applications, and other smart
technologies to facilitate co-creative service innovation through increased interactions
between customers, and service staff, and further can take the help of innovative tools
Facebook, Amazon, YouTube [23]. Third, the service provider and different actors and the
other engagement platforms of the smart tourism ecosystem could help decisions maker
to take extensive decisions for utilizing the maximum output in case of resource sharing.
Based on this, decision-makers should be encouraged to maintain a sustainable relationship
and to extend the knowledge to be exchanged through the actor’s participation and the
interactions through the optimal use of smart tourism devices. Finally, it focuses on smart
tourism, and ICT, which government should focus on as there are very few investments in
tourism in Bangladesh [12] to uplift the tourism industry.

7. Limitation and Directions for the Future Work

This work includes some limitations and the main one is in the methodology. This
took only the interview from the tour operator, the hotels and the tourist, while it can also
take interview from other actors, such as government organizations, host communities,
local and international agency and all other stakeholders working as actors to make more
comparisons and the acceptance of different technologies. So, further research can be
conducted with others stakeholders working as actors. The number of executives of
different tour operators and hotels interviewed can also be increased for the validity of the
data; future research can be conducted with a larger sample size. The observation method
can also be employed to understand and analyze the content (sharing of social networks and
reviews from online sites) in order to execute more in-depth data analysis and gain more
insights. So, both case study and observation method for data collection can be applied for
further research for understanding more on the topic. In addition, to generalize the finding
of the study its insights to Bangladesh’s hotel and tour operators, other industries and other
contexts can be taken into consideration for future work. However, the extensive future
research can be carried out on other issues on privacy concerns of data transfer through
smart tourism tools, the challenges of value co- creation through smart technologies, tourist
satisfaction while co creating smart tourism services, and variations of smart tourism
tools used different level of hotels (star ranking hotels and B&B hotel) and tour operators
(domestic and international tour operator).

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, K.H.B., N.M.Z. and K.M.A.I.; methodology, V.N., N.M.Z.
and K.M.A.I.; software, I.J.; validation, I.J., S.S. and O.T.; formal analysis, K.H.B., V.N. and K.M.A.I.;
investigation, I.J., S.S. and O.T.; resources, K.H.B., S.S. and O.T.; data curation, I.J., N.M.Z. and O.T.;
writing—original draft preparation, K.H.B., N.M.Z. and V.N.; writing—review and editing, V.N. and
K.M.A.I.; visualization, K.H.B., S.S. and K.M.A.I.; supervision, V.N. All authors have read and agreed
to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 13 of 14

References
1. Buhalis, D.; Amaranggana, A. Smart tourism destinations enhancing tourism experience through personalisation of services. In
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 377–389.
2. Pysar, N.; Dergachova, V.; Kyvliuk, O.; Svyrydenko, D. Strategies for development of Ukrainian energy market under conditions
of geopolitical challenges. Natsionalnoho Hirnychyi Universytet. Nauk. Visnyk 2018, 5, 148–154. [CrossRef]
3. Tom Dieck, T.M.C.; Jung, T. A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Curr. Issues
Tour. 2018, 21, 154–174. [CrossRef]
4. Boes, K.; Buhalis, D.; Inversini, A. Smart tourism destinations: Ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness. Int. J. Tour.
Cities 2016, 2, 108–124. [CrossRef]
5. Ingram, K.; Nitsenko, V. Comparative analysis of public management models. Nauk. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu
2021, 4, 122–127. [CrossRef]
6. Gretzel, U.; Sigala, M.; Xiang, Z.; Koo, C. Smart tourism: Foundations and developments. Electron. Mark. 2015, 25, 179–188.
[CrossRef]
7. Koval, V.; Kovshun, N.; Plekhanova, O.; Kvitka, S.; Haran, O. The role of interactive marketing in agricultural investment
attraction. Int. Multidiscip. Sci. Geoconference 2019, 19, 877–884.
8. Khmel, I. Humanization of Virtual Communication: From Digit to Image. Philos. Cosmol. 2021, 27, 126–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Sokiran, M. Basic Principles of Public Administration of Critical Information Infrastructure: The Example of Ukraine. Adv. Space
Law 2021, 7, 63–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Kryzhanivs’kyi, E.; Horal, L.; Perevozova, I.; Shiyko, V.; Mykytiuk, N.; Berlous, M. Fuzzy cluster analysis of indicators for
assessing the potential of recreational forest use. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2020, 2713, 125–144.
11. Werthner, H.; Alzua-Sorzabal, A.; Cantoni, L.; Dickinger, A.; Gretzel, U.; Jannach, D.; Neidhardt, J.; Pröll, B.; Ricci, F.; Scaglione,
M.; et al. Future research issues in IT and tourism. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2015, 15, 1–15. [CrossRef]
12. Krushkin, E.D.; Nitsenko, V.S. The Main Directions and Mechanism of Implementation of Rural Development. AIC Eco. Mang.
2013, 10, 122–132. Available online: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P2
1DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/ecupapk_2013_10_28.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2022).
13. Kuflik, T.; Wecker, A.; Lanir, J.; Stock, O. An integrative framework for extending the boundaries of the museum visit experience:
Linking the pre, during, and post-visit phases. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2014, 15, 17–47. [CrossRef]
14. Stanišić, T.; Milićević, S.; Krstić, B. Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the
EU Countries. Probl. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 17, 64–70.
15. Zeynalli, L.; Rahimli, E. The Role of Human Capital in Increasing Tourism Potential in a Post-Conflict Situation. Future Human
Image 2022, 17, 101–110. [CrossRef]
16. Dong, X.; Liu, S.; Li, H.; Yang, Z.; Liang, S.; Deng, N. Love of nature as a mediator between connectedness to nature and
sustainable consumption behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 1–12. [CrossRef]
17. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Yang, F. Do motivations contribute to local residents’ engagement in pro-environmental behaviors?
Resident-destination relationship and pro-environmental climate perspective. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 834–852. [CrossRef]
18. Almeida, R.P.; Proença, J.F.; Ferreira, F.N.H. Value Co-Creation and Sustainability: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Mark.
Commun. New Media 2021, 9, 104–125. Available online: http://u3isjournal.isvouga.pt/index.php/ijmcnm/article/viewFile/560/
265 (accessed on 5 September 2022).
19. Voskolupov, V.; Balanovska, T.; Havrysh, O.; Gogulya, O.; Drahnieva, N. Marketing Management AS A Tool FOR Preventing
Crisis OF Agricultural Enterprises. Financ. Credit. Act. Probl. Theory Pract. 2021, 5, 410–417.
20. Harisson, W.; Glisson, J.; Bucher, R.; Salzmann, H.; Denk, M. Protection of railway infrastructure from rockfall and debris flow
using a dynamic rockfall: Debris flow barrier. In Proceedings of the CORE 2010, Conference on Railway Engineering, Wellington,
New Zealand, 12–15 September 2010.
21. Neuhofer, B.; Buhalis, D.; Ladkin, A. Smart technologies for personalized experiences: A case study in the hospitality domain.
Electron. Mark. 2015, 25, 243–254. [CrossRef]
22. Xiang, Z.; Wang, D.; O’Leary, J.; Fesenmaier, D. Adapting to the Internet. J. Travel Res. 2015, 54, 511–527. [CrossRef]
23. Washburn, D.; Sindhu, U.; Balaouras, S.; Dines, R.A.; Hayes, N.; Nelson, L.E. Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives.
Growth 2009, 17, 1–17.
24. Edeh, F.O.; Zayed, N.M.; Perevozova, I.; Kryshtal, H.; Nitsenko, V. Talent Management in the Hospitality Sector: Predicting
Discretionary Work Behaviour. Admin. Sci. 2022, 12, 122. [CrossRef]
25. Murphy, P.; Pritchard, M.P.; Smith, B. The destination product and its impact on traveler perceptions. Tour. Manag. 2000, 21, 43–52.
[CrossRef]
26. Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, D. Factors affecting hotels’ adoption of mobile reservation systems: A technology-organization-
environment framework. Tour. Manag. 2016, 53, 163–172.
27. Nitsenko, V.; Mardani, A.; Kuksa, I.; Sudarkina, L. Additional opportunities of systematization the marketing research for
resource conservation practice. Manag. Theory Stud. Rural. Bus. Infrastruct. Dev. 2018, 40, 361–368. [CrossRef]
28. Zine, P.; Kulkarni, M.; Chawla, R.; Ray, A. A Framework for Value Co-creation through Customization and Personalization in the
Context of Machine Tool PSS. Procedia CIRP 2014, 16, 32–37. [CrossRef]
29. Kim, H.; Law, R. Smartphones in Tourism and Hospitality Marketing: A Literature Review. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2015, 32, 692–711.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 15043 14 of 14

30. Melville, N.P. Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Q. 2010, 34, 1–21. [CrossRef]
31. Jahan, I.; Bhuiyan, K.H.; Rahman, S.; Bipasha, M.S.; Zayed, N.M. Factors influencing consumers’ attitude toward techno-
marketing: An empirical analysis on restaurant businesses in Bangladesh. Int. J. Manag. 2020, 11, 114–129. [CrossRef]
32. Jung, T.; tom Dieck, M.C. Augmented reality, virtual reality and 3D printing for the co-creation of value for the visitor experience
at cultural heritage places. J. Place Manag. Dev. 2017, 10, 140–151. [CrossRef]
33. Kobra, M.K.; Bhuiyan, K.H.; Zayed, N.M. Well and Woes of Tourism Promotion in Bangladesh: Investment Perspective.
Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J. 2018, 22, 1–8.
34. Morosan, C. Understanding the Benefit of Purchasing Ancillary Air Travel Services Via Mobile Phones. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2015,
32, 227–240. [CrossRef]
35. Saarijärvi, H.; Kannan, P.; Kuusela, H. Value co-creation: Theoretical approaches and practical implications. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2013,
25, 6–19. [CrossRef]
36. Sebastia, L.; Garcia, I.; Onaindia, E.; Guzman, C. e-Tourism: A tourist recommendation and planning application. Int. J. Artif.
Intell. Tools 2009, 18, 717–738. [CrossRef]
37. Kobra, M.K.; Khalil, M.I.; Rubi, M.A.; Kulsum, U.; Zayed, N.M. Factors and Strategies to Drive the Choice of Women Graduates
to Enter into Tourism and Hospitality Sector: A Perceptual Strategic Study. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2019, 18, 1–7. Available
online: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Factors-and-strategies-to-drive-the-choice-of-women-graduates-to-enter-into-
tourism-and-hospitality-sector-a-perceptual-strategic-study-1939-6104-18-6-474.pdf (accessed on 8 September 2022).
38. Akhundova, A.; Zayed, N.M.; Ibrahim, M.A. Economic Performance Evaluation of the Tourism Resources of the Republic of Azer-
baijan. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2021, 20, 1–14. Available online: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Economic-performance-
evaluation-of-the-tourism-resources-of-the-republic-of-Azerbaijan-1939-6104-20-S1-653.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2022).
39. E-Alam, M.F.; Meero, A.; Rahman, A.A.A.; Zayed, N.M.; Islam, K.M.A.; Imran, M.A. Social Media and Tourists’ Decision in
Bangladesh: An Empirical Study on Travelling Cox’s Bazar. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 2022, 13, 925–934.
40. Striukov, V.V.; Grynko, T.V.; Krupskyi, O.P.; Vazov, R.G. Current state and strategic directions of development of state management
of nursing education in Ukraine. Medicni Perspektivi 2022, 27, 174–183. [CrossRef]
41. Lyon, J.Y.; Bogodistov, Y.; Moormann, J. AI-driven Optimization in Healthcare: The Diagnostic Process. Eur. J. Manag. Issues 2021,
29, 218–231. [CrossRef]
42. Kreiseder, F.; Mosenhauer, M. Watching the Watchmen: Assessment-Biases in Waiting List Prioritization for the Delivery of
Mental Health Services. Eur. J. Manag. Issues 2022, 30, 3–16. [CrossRef]
43. Dinter, M.; Grässle, S.; Mosenhauer, M. The Effect of Fragile Self-Esteem on Course Completion in Higher Education. Eur. J.
Manag. Issues 2022, 30, 131–141. [CrossRef]
44. Aldjic, K.; Farrell, W. Work and Espoused National Cultural Values of Generation Z in Austria. Eur. J. Manag. Issues 2022, 30,
100–115. [CrossRef]
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction
prohibited without permission.