MÁS RADIOTERAPIA SI RECAÍDA y Biopsia A Todos. 310 Personas
MÁS RADIOTERAPIA SI RECAÍDA y Biopsia A Todos. 310 Personas
MÁS RADIOTERAPIA SI RECAÍDA y Biopsia A Todos. 310 Personas
Purpose: Definitive chemoradiation (CR) has replaced Results: Posttreatment biopsies were positive in 15%
radical surgery as the preferred treatment of epidermoid of patients in the 5-FU arm versus 7.7% in the MMC arm
carcinoma of the anal canal. To determine the impor- (P = .135). At 4 years, colostomy rates were lower (9%
tance of mitomycin (MMC) in the standard CR regimen v 22%; P = .002), colostomy-free survival higher (71% v
and to assess the role of salvage CR in patients who have 59%; P = .014), and disease-free survival higher (73%
residual tumor following CR, a phase III randomized trial v 51 %; P = .0003) in the MMC arm. A significant differ-
was undertaken by the Radiation Therapy Oncology ence in overall survival has not been observed at 4 years.
Group (RTOG)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Toxicity was greater in the MMC arm (23% v 7% grade
(ECOG). 4 and 5 toxicity; P < .001). Of 24 assessable patients
Patients andMethods: Between August 1988 and De- who underwent salvage CR, 12 (50%) were rendered
cember 1991, 310 patients were randomized to receive disease-free.
either radiotherapy (RT) and fluorouracil (5-FU) or radio- Conclusion: Despite greater toxicity, the use of MMC
therapy, 5-FU, and MMC. Of 291 assessable patients, in a definitive CR regimen for anal cancer is justified,
145 received 45 to 50.4 Gy of pelvic RT plus 5-FU at particularly in patients with large primary tumors. Sal-
1,000 mg/m 2/d for 4 days, and 146 received RT, 5-FU, vage CR should be attempted in patients with residual
and MMC (10 mg/m 2 per dose for two doses). Patients disease following definitive CR before resorting to radi-
with residual tumor on posttreatment biopsy were cal surgery.
treated with a salvage regimen that consisted of addi- J Clin Oncol 14:2527-2539. © 1996 by American So-
tional pelvic RT (9 Gy), 5-FU, and cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 ). ciety of Clinical Oncology.
E
I
PIDERMOID CARCINOMAS of the anal region
comprise only 1% to 2% of large bowel cancers
et al,23 in a series of nonrandomized trials, reported im-
proved local control with MMC-containing regimens
and 3.9% of anorectal carcinomas.' Nevertheless, these when compared with regimens in which 5-FU and RT
neoplasms have dramatically increased in importance were used without MMC.
over the past 20 years as a model for organ preservation In view of the high success rate of this combined mo-
with the use of concomitant radiation (RT) and chemo- dality program and the increased toxicity attributed to
therapy in lieu of radical surgery. 2 Before the application
of chemoradiation (CR) regimens, the 5-year survival rate
of patients with anal epidermoid malignancies managed
by radical surgery ranged from 40% to 60% and local From the University of California, San Francisco,Fresno; Radia-
relapse was common.34 tion Oncology Center, Sacramento; University of California, San
The combined modality regimen initially described by Francisco, CA: Statistical Section, Radiation Therapy Oncology
Group Headquarters;Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA;
Nigro et a 5 in 1974 was a preoperative regimen that Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; State University of New
subsequently evolved into a definitive treatment program York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, NY: Washington University
by 1983.67 More than 500 patients treated with CR using Medical School, St Louis. MO: Halifax Hospital Medical Center,
fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and mitomycin (MMC) have Daytona Beach, FL; and Wisconsin Medical Complex, Milwaukee,
been reported over the past 18 years.6 '12 Complete and WI.
Submitted August 3, 1995: accepted April 1, 1996.
sustained tumor eradication has been reported in 75% to
Supported by grants no. CA-32115 and CA-21661 from the Na-
90% of patients reported in series in which both modal- tional Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
ities are used concomitantly. 7 °8' '0"1' 3 ' 20 All reported regi- Presented in part at the Thirty-FirstAnnual Meeting of the Ameri-
mens use variations of both 5-FU infusion and MMC can Society of Clinical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, May 23, 1995.
chemotherapy as initially described by Nigro et al. 5 How- Address reprint requests to Marshall S. Flam, MD. Hematology-
Oncology Medical Group, Cancer Center at Saint Agnes, 7130 N
ever, there are no randomized data regarding the relative
Millbrook Ave, Suite 100, Fresno, CA 93720; Email MSLEVEN@
importance of each component used in this combined SAMC.com.
modality regimen. Some investigators 22 have questioned © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
the necessity of MMC in this regimen, while Cummings 0732-183X/96/1409-001 7$3.00/0
MMC, a randomized study was initiated by the Radiation component of the study, the tolerable dose was determined to be 10
Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Eastern Coopera- mg/m'2.
The randomized portion of the study began accrual in August
tive Oncology Group (ECOG) to determine whether 1988 and closed to new patient entry in December 1991. A total of
MMC is a necessary component of this efficacious com- 310 patients were randomized from 104 institutions that contributed
bined modality treatment. A previous phase I/II study to the study through the RTOG or ECOG. Eligibility criteria included
(RTOG 83-14) suggested that there were sufficient pa- any epidermoid malignancy of the anal canal in which the primary
tumor was measurable and presenting with any tumor or nodal stage.
tients available to launch a phase III trial.' 6
A Karnofsky performance status 2 60 was required.
Historically, abdominoperineal resection has been used Before entry, patients were required to undergo a staging work-
for salvage attempts in the majority of the 10% to 20% up that consisted of a chest x-ray, computed tomographic (CT) scan
of patients who had either gross or microscopic residual of the abdomen and pelvis, and a bipedal lymphangiogram if the CT
disease following combined CR treatments.7 81 ' 3 16,2 1 How- scan was positive for pelvic lymph nodes. Laboratory investigations
consisted of complete blood cell counts, and blood chemistries, in-
ever, it appears that surgical salvage is often ineffective cluding liver and renal function tests. Tumor size and extent was
in preventing subsequent local recurrence and death from indicated on an anatomic diagram. A fine-needle aspiration biopsy
distant metastases.8' 2 In 1987, Flam et al" described an of any enlarged inguinal or pelvic lymph nodes was required to
effective CR salvage regimen using 5-FU infusion, cis- stage the patients properly before entry. If the fine-needle aspiration
platin, and additional RT. The randomized study we re- biopsy was negative, an excisional biopsy of one inguinal lymph
node was required. Determination of creatinine clearance was re-
port here used salvage CR in all patients with residual quired before salvage therapy.
disease following definitive CR, to assess the efficacy of All patients gave informed written consent before they were ran-
nonsurgical salvage therapy. Only if patients demon- domized. Patients were stratified before randomization by nodal sta-
strated residual tumor on biopsy following salvage CR tus (NO v NI), histology (keratinizing squamous nonkeratinizing
squamous), and primary tumor size (< 5 cm v 2 5 cm). The random-
were they subjected to abdominoperineal resection.
ization scheme derived by Zelen 24 was used to achieve balance in the
treatment assignments among the institutions with three stratification
PATIENTS AND METHODS variables.
Before activation of the randomized trial, a pilot study was under- The study schema is demonstrated in Fig 1. The RT dose and
taken to determine the tolerable dose of MMC that could be adminis- fields. as well as the 5-FU dose and timing, were identical in the
tered twice during RT. Based on 19 patients treated in a phase II two treatment arms, which differed only in the absence or adminis-
Chemotherapy
Cycle
#1 Cycle #2 Cycle#3 |
Cheno Chemo Chemo
AP Resection
Radiation Therapy
cy x BxlC)
45 Gy/25 f5 wks. 9.0 G f
b,
Fig 1. Treatment schema of
phase Ill randomized study of 5-
No treatment I No treatment FU + RT v 5-FU, MMC, and RT
Da- l I I I I I I in carcinoma of the anal canal-
llr
0 1 4 28 32 35 63-77 60-74 105-126 RTOG 87-04/ECOG 1289.
Chemotherapy: ARM 1: 5-FU 1000 mg/m/24 hrs. continuous IV for 96 hours, Day 1 and Day 2B of RT
Cycles 1 &2 ARM 2: 5-FU as above +Milo C: 10 mg/ma IV bolus on day 1 of each S-FU course (max 20 mgs per cycle)
Salvage Therapy: Chemo (Cycle 3): 5-FU as above. Starting within 2 weeks of biopsy. CDDP 100 mg/m' IV over 6 hrs. on day
2 of RT (if creatinine < 50 substitute mito C).
Radiation: 9.00 Gy boost RTwith electrontphoton beam on perineum/inguinal nodes/both.
Fig 2. RT fields RTOG-87-04. (A) Two-field (AP-PA) technique. Superior border dropped to bottom of scaroiliac joints at 30.6 Gy and lower
corner blocks were not used. At 36.0 Gy, 10- x 10-cm fields with unchanged inferior borders were used. (B) When inguinal nodes were
involved, anterior field flared to include both inguinal regions. Shaded area was boosted by electrons or photons to bring nodal dose at 3-cm
depth to 50.4 Gy.
assigned to receive 5-FU alone did receive MMC. Table 3 lists the than 4 cm and had left an area of thickening that was more than
number of cycles of chemotherapy given in each treatment arm. 25% of the anal circumference, a biopsy of the central portion of
Salvage chemotherapy consisted of the same dose and schedule the thickening that would include the deepest area of the scar was
2
of 5-FU infusion. Cisplatin was administered at 100 mg/m over 4 acceptable and advised to avoid complications of biopsy, including
to 6 hours on day 2 of the 5-FU infusion. If the creatinine clearance rectovaginal fistula, long-standing fissures, or incontinence. The re-
was less than 50 mL/min at the time of initiation of salvage therapy, sponse of initially metastatic lymph nodes was gauged by palpation
2
MMC at 10 mg/m by intravenous bolus was used in lieu of cisplatin by the investigating physician. If palpation proved equivocal, the
if the WBC count was more than 2,400/tpL and the platelet count investigator could use a fine-needle biopsy at his/her discretion.
more than 85,000/pL.
Study End Points
PostinductionBiopsy The end points for the study were incidence of negative postinduc-
The primary tumor response was determined by a full-thickness tion biopsy, incidence of positive salvage biopsy, local regional con-
biopsy 4 to 6 weeks following completion of CR (postinduction trol, time to colostomy, colostomy-free survival, disease-free sur-
biopsy). Biopsy was delayed until the WBC count was more than vival, overall survival, and toxicity rates. Patients with a positive
2,400/tL and the platelet count more than 100,000/pL. If patients postinduction biopsy were considered to have local failure on the day
were found to have residual tumor and were treated with the salvage of the biopsy and patients with a negative biopsy were considered to
CR program, an additional full-thickness postsalvage biopsy was have local failure on the day a local recurrence was first reported.
required 4 to 6 weeks following completion of salvage therapy. With
anterior lesions in women and in lesions that were initially greater
Table 3. Actual No. of Chemotherapy Courses Delivered
No. of Courses
Table 2. Distribution of RT Doses to Primary Tumor During
2
Induction Therapy No.
Arm Drug Assessable 0 1 No. %
41.76- 47.26- 52.26-
Total < 41.75 Gy 47.25 Gy 52.25 Gy 57.25 Gy RT + 5-FU 5-FU 144 0 8 136 94
RT +5-FU 145 7 95 42 1 RT + 5-FU/MMC 5-FU 146 0 8 138 95
RT + 5-FU MMC 144 142 2 0 0
RT+ 5-FU/MMC 146 6 101 39 0
RT + 5-FU/MMC MMC 146 0 9 137 94
Combined 291 13 196 81 1
NOTE. No information on 1 patient in the RT + 5-FU group.
75 -
o
50 -
Fig 3. Time to colostomy-
RTOG 87-04/ECOG 1289. 0
q
25- I
-- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
n-
U -I
I
0 1 2 3 4
YEARS FROM START OF TREATMENT
23% of the 5-FU group underwent colostomies (P = .002, The colostomy rate for patients with RTOG stage NO
Cox model) (Table 8). Of 13 patients in the 5-FU plus was 13.3%, as compared with 28% for patients with posi-
MMC group who underwent colostomies, 11 had residual tive nodes (RTOG Nl). Thus, N1 patients are at greater
disease; only two patients had the surgical procedure for risk of colostomy failure than NO patients. Among pa-
treatment complications. Of 32 patients in the 5-FU arm tients with RTOG stage NO disease, nine of 121 patients
who underwent colostomies, 29 had residual disease, two who received 5-FU/MMC, compared with 23 of 119 pa-
had treatment complications in addition to residual dis- tients who received 5-FU, underwent colostomy (P =
ease, and one underwent colostomy for unknown reasons. .009, Gray's test). Among patients with RTOG stage N1
After 2 years, the number of patients who had a colostomy disease, five of 25 patients who received 5-FU/MMC,
was extremely low, including three of 90 patients at risk compared with nine of 25 patients who received 5-FU,
in the 5-FU-alone group and two of 106 patients at risk underwent colostomy. Thus, a benefit of MMC in the
in the 5-FU/MMC group. Thus, the 2-year colostomy reduction of colostomy rates was observed in NO patients.
rate probably represents a relatively accurate long-term While a trend in favor of MMC in N1 patients was ob-
projection of the final colostomy rates. served, the sample size of this subgroup is too small to
The impact of MMC on colostomy rate reduction was achieve statistical significance.
most significant in RTOG T3/T4 primary tumors (P = The treatment difference was significant when colos-
.019) (Fig 4) and did not achieve statistical significance tomy-free survival was evaluated (Fig 6). At 4 years, an
for RTOG T1/T2 primary tumors (P = .141) (Fig 5). In estimated 71% of patients assigned to receive MMC were
patients assigned to the MMC arm, there was no differ- alive without a colostomy, as compared with 59% of
ence found in the colostomy rates between the smaller patients not assigned to MMC (P = .014, Cox model).
and the larger primary tumors.
Disease-Free Survival
Table 8. Frequency of Patients With Colostomy by Treatment Program
The two treatment groups were evaluated with respect
% No. Colostomy'/ % No. Colostomyt/ to disease-free survival, where failure was defined as the
Treatment Colostomy' Total Colostomyt Total
first disease progression. Patients were censored from
RT + 5-FU 8.2 12/145 22 32/145
RT + 5-FU +
analysis if and when death occurred without disease pro-
MMC 3.4 5/146 9 13/146
gression. The disease-free survival rate was significantly
better for MMC patients (P = .0003, Cox model). At 4
NOTE. Colostomy designates colostomy, AP resection, and more exten-
sive resection. years, an estimated 73% of MMC patients were alive
*Within 7 months of the start of treatment. without disease, as compared with 51% of the group that
tActuarial estimate at 4 years. received only 5-FU (Fig 7).
75-
IP
50-
0 Fig 4. Time to colostomy for
RTOG T3 and T4-RTOG 87-04/
u ECOG 1289.
-
J -
25-
-___ _ _ _ ____ -I
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -
0 ___
0 1 2 3 4
YEARS FROM START OF TREATMENT
75
O
Io
50
Fig 5. Time to colostomy for
RTOG TI and T2-RTOG 87-04/ t
ECOG 1289.
25
0 1 2 3 4
YEARS FROM START OF TREATMENT
-'-- 4
III
.J
1 50
4 FAILURES/TOTAL
Fig 6. Colostomy free sur- RT + 5FU (56/145)
vival-RTOG 87-04/ECOG 1289. RT + 5FU/MITO (37/146) P = .014 (COX MODEL)
25
115 93 71
125 108 I
0
0 1 2 3 4
YEARS FROM RANDOMIZATION
tions were observed. The distribution of late toxicities Results of Salvage Treatment
was not significantly different in the two treatment arms.
Of 28 patients with positive biopsies, three did not
Overall, 7% (10 of 145) of patients randomized to the 5- receive salvage treatment because of patient refusal (n =
FU arm experienced grade IV toxicity and one (0.7%) 1) or clinician's preference (n = 2) (Fig 9). Of 25 patients
grade V (fatal) toxicity. In contrast, 23% (34 of 146) of who received salvage treatment, 15 were treated initially
the patients randomized to 5-FU plus MMC experienced with 5-FU alone and 10 with 5-FU plus MMC. All 25
grade IV toxicity and 2.7% (four patients) experienced patients received 5-FU and cisplatin with RT as salvage
fatal toxicities (P - .001). All of the patients who experi- treatment. Of 25 analyzable patients, 22 were subjected
enced toxic deaths died of neutropenic sepsis. Two toxic to postsalvage biopsies and 12 of the 22 or 55% demon-
deaths in the MMC group were related to a lack of dose strated negative biopsies. No striking difference was ob-
reduction per protocol of the second cycle of MMC. served in the outcome of salvage treatment by initial treat-
100
/A--//f# - - ''. , ,
75 . w-, ens##
.M
Lu
4> 50
Fig 7. Disease-free sur-
FAILED/TOTAL vival-RTOG 87-04/ECOG 1289.
RT + 5FU (62/133)
RT + 5FUIMITO (31/129) P = .0003 (COX MODEL)
25
0
0 1 2 3 4
YEARS FROM RANDOMIZATION
100-
-+~ ~'~
rmNIIY- M*,IftH 1 M
75.
50- DEAD/TOTAL
RT + 5FU 42/145) Fig 8. Overall survival-
RT + 5FU/MITO (32/146) P = .31 (COX MODEL) RTOG 87-04/ECOG 1289.
25
NUMBER AT RISK
145 135 103 71 32
146 134 114 89 40
n. I
I
0 1 2 3 4
YEARS FROM RANDOMIZATION
ment arm. Toxicity observed with the salvage regimen treatment of epidermoid malignancies of the anal canal.
was limited and no deaths from salvage treatment were Table 11 lists the 4-year efficacy end points for this study.
observed. Initial posttreatment biopsies were positive in 15% of
Follow-up evaluation of the 12 patients who underwent patients who received RT plus 5-FU and in 7.7% of pa-
successful salvage CR (negative biopsy postsalvage) tients who received RT/5-FU/MMC. The improvement
shows that four remain free of disease at 4 years, four in negative biopsy rates occurs mainly in patients with
had a subsequent abdominoperineal resection (and are primary tumors > 5 cm. This difference was achieved
free of disease), and four have died (two with recurrent with a significantly higher incidence of acute hematologic
disease, one of unknown cause with recurrent disease, toxicity in the MMC group.
and one of unrelated cause free of disease). In the patients Although MMC-treated patients did not experience a
who failed to respond to salvage treatment (positive post- statistically significant increase in overall survival, a sta-
salvage biopsy), nine of 10 underwent abdominoperineal tistically significant reduction in colostomy rates and an
resection. Seven patients have died (six of progressive increase in colostomy-free survival and disease-free sur-
disease and one of unrelated causes) and three remain vival was observed at 4 years, thereby justifying the inclu-
free of disease with colostomy. In summary, additional sion of MMC in this definitive CR regimen. The major
CR was able to salvage, without colostomy, one third benefit of MMC in reducing colostomy rates and improv-
(seven of 22) of assessable patients who failed to respond ing colostomy-free survival occurred in patients with
to initial standard CR. Overall, 50% (11 of 22) of these
patients were alive without disease at 4 years.
Table 10. Observed Grade 4 and 5 Toxicities
DISCUSSION
%Toxicity per Treatment
This randomized phase III study attempts to define the Type of Toxicity 5-FU 5-FU + MMC P
role of MMC and salvage CR in the definitive nonsurgical
Acute*-total 7 20 < .001
Acute hematologic 3 18 < .001
Table 9. Causes of Death by Treatment Arm Acute nonhematologic 4 7 .63
Latet 1 5 .26
5-FU 5-FU +MMC
Maximum (acute or late)
Total dead 42 32 Grade 4 7 (10/145) 23 (34/146)
Progressive disease 24 15 < .001
Treatment complications 1 4 Grade 5 0.7 (1/145) 3 (4/146)
Unrelated/other 13 9
*Acute toxicity, occurs within 90 days from start of treatment.
Unknown 4 4
tLate toxicity, occurs after 90 days.
larger primary tumors (RTOG T3/T4) as compared with the early timing of postsalvage biopsies. The effective-
smaller primary tumors (RTOG T1/T2). ness of immediate salvage CR in patient who fail to
This study demonstrates a possible salvage CR benefit achieve complete remission with definitive CR may be
using additional CR consisting of cisplatin, 5-FU, and a difficult to ascertain, as a number of investigators do not
9.0-Gy pelvic radiation boost in patients with positive undertake elective biopsy of clinical residual abnormali-
biopsies following initial CR to a dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy. ties and do not initiate immediate CR, but monitor these
Twelve of 22 assessable patients with residual disease patients without treatment.3 7'3 8
following initial CR demonstrated negative postsalvage While additional follow-up evaluation will be required
therapy biopsies. A third of these 12 patients remained to determine any potential long-term survival impact of
disease free without colostomy at 4 years. MMC and nonsurgical salvage therapy, and to ascertain
Salvage abdominoperineal resection has proven to be the incidence of late toxicities, the following conclusions
ineffective in the majority patients with residual tumor regarding the future treatment of these patients can be
following CR.8 36' In our patients with residual disease drawn.
following salvage CR, surgery resulted in one third (three (1) MMC in combination with 5-FU and RT favorably
of nine) of these patients being disease-free at 4 years. affects postinduction biopsy rates, colostomy rates, colos-
Thus, it appears that if both MMC and salvage CR are tomy-free survival, and disease-free survival in all pa-
used, less than 10% of patients require abdominoperineal tients with epidermoid malignancies of the anal canal,
resection and colostomy at 4 years. Nevertheless, the is- regardless of the histologic subtype, nodal status, and size
sue of the efficacy of nonsurgical salvage therapy remains of the primary tumor, and should be used in all patients,
uncertain due to the relatively small number of cases and except possibly those with very small primary tumors. 39
(2) Based on the significant incidence of neutropenia
Table 11. Summary of Efficacy End Points: RTOG 8704/ECOG 1289
and the significant grade 4 and 5 toxicities encountered
in the MMC arm, the MMC should not be used routinely
Estimated
4-year
rates(%) P in patients who are immunosuppressed or who are human
End Point 5-FU 5-FU + MMC Univariate Multivariate immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, due to the inabil-
Positive postinduction biopsy 15 8 .098 .135
ity of these patients to tolerate neutropenia.
Local failure rate 34 16 .0007 .0008 (3) Patients with positive inguinal or pelvic nodes
Colostomy rate 22 9 .0025 .002 should not be excluded from future trials, as both node-
Colostomy-free survival 59 71 .019 .014 positive and node-negative patients appear to benefit sig-
Disease-free survival 51 73 .0002 .0003 nificantly from nonsurgical definitive CR with MMC in
Overall survival 67 76 .18 .31
combination with 5-FU and RT.
(4) For patients treated with definitive nonsurgical CR with additional follow-up time. Only those patients with
who demonstrate residual disease on early posttreatment persistent and progressive local disease following salvage
biopsies at 4 to 6 weeks after CR, abdominoperineal re- CR on longer follow-up evaluation of at least 12 weeks
section should not be immediately undertaken. This sub- and those who recur locally following successful CR
group of approximately 10% to 15% of patients should should be subjected to abdominoperineal resection.
either be treated with early salvage CR using 5-FU infu-
sion, cisplatin, and pelvic radiation boost, or should be ACKNOWLEDGMENT
monitored closely without treatment for an additional 4 We thank Nancy Connor for data management and Elizabeth Mar-
to 6 weeks to see if they achieve a complete response tin, RTT, for dosimetry.
REFERENCES
1. Stearns MW. Jr, Urmacher C, Sternberg SS. et al: Cancer of 17. Schlienger M, Krzisch C, Pene F, et al: Epidermoid carcinoma
the anal canal. Curr Probl Cancer 4:1-44, 1980 of the anal canal: Treatment results and prognostic variables in a
2. Flam MS, John MD: Anal canal, in John MJ. Flam MS, Legha series of 242 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:1141-1151,
SS, et al (eds): Chemoradiation: An Integrated Approach to Cancer 1989
Treatment. Philadelphia, PA, Lea & Febiger, 1993, pp 337-346 18. Habr-Gama A, DaSilva E, Sousa A, et al: Epidermoid carci-
3. Beahrs OH: Management of cancer of the anus. Am J Roent- noma of the anal canal. Results of treatment by combined chemother-
genol 133:790-795, 1979 apy and radiation therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 32:773-777, 1989
4. Quan SHQ: Epidermoid carcinoma of the ano-rectum. NY 19. Knecht BH: Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for
State J Med 77:2056-2057, 1977 carcinomas of the anus. Am J Surg 159:518-521, 1990
5. Nigro ND, Vaitkevicius VK, Considine B Jr: Combined ther- 20. Cho CC, Taylor CW II, Padmanabhan A, et al: Squamous-
apy for cancer of the anal canal: A preliminary report. Dis Colon cell carcinoma of the anal canal: Management with combined che-
Rectum 17:354-356, 1974 moradiation therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 34:675-678, 1991
6. Flam MS, John MJ, Lovalvo LJ, et al: Definitive nonsurgical 21. Zelnick RS, Haas PA, Ajlouni M, et al: Results of abdomino-
therapy of epithelial malignancies of the anal canal: A report of 12 perineal resections for failures after combination chemotherapy and
cases. Cancer 51:1378-1387, 1983 radiation therapy for anal canal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 35:574-
7. Cummings B, Keane T, Gillian T, et al: Results and toxicity 578, 1992
of the treatment of anal canal carcinoma by radiation therapy or 22. Byfield JE, Barone RM, Sharp TR, et al: Conservative man-
radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Cancer 54:2062-2068, 1984 agement without alkylating agents of squamous cell anal cancer
8. Leichman L, Nigro N, Vaitkevicius VK, et al: Cancer of the using cyclical 5-FU alone and x-ray therapy. Cancer Treat Rep
anal canal: Model for preoperative adjuvant combined modality 67:709-712, 1985
treatment. Am J Med 78:211-216, 1985 23. Cummings BJ, Keane TJ, O'Sullivan B, et al: Epidermoid
9. Michaelson RA, Magill GB, Ivan SH, et al: Preoperative che- anal cancer: Treatment by radiation alone or by radiation and 5-
motherapy and radiation therapy in the management of anal epider- fluorouracil with and without mitomycin-C. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
moid cancer. Cancer 51:390-395, 1983 Phys 21:1115-1125, 1991
10. Sischy B: The use of radiation therapy combined with chemo- 24. Zelen M: The randomization and stratification of patients to
therapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus clinical trials. J Chron Dis 27:365-275, 1974
and marginally resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Int J Radiat 25. Harmer MH (ed): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors
Oncol Biol Phys 11:1587-1593, 1985 (ed 3). Geneva, Switzerland, International Union Against Cancer,
11. Flam MS, John MJ, Mowry PA, et al: Definitive combined 1978, pp 77-81
modality therapy of carcinoma of the anus: A report of 30 cases 26. Sischy B, Krall J, Pazdur B, et al: Evaluation of RTOG 83-
including results of salvage therapy in patients with residual disease. 4 phase II study of the treatment of squamous cell basaloid carcinoma
Dis Colon Rectum 30:495-502, 1987 of the anal canal by radiation therapy and chemotherapy for sensiti-
12. Secco GB, Sertoli MR, Scarpati D, et al: Preoperative chemo- zation followed by biopsy + surgery. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 7:93,
therapy and radiotherapy in the management of epidermoid carci- 1988 (abstr)
noma of the anal canal. Tumori 73:151-155, 1987 27. Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, et al (eds): Manual for
13. Meeker WR Jr, Sickie-Santanello BJ, Philpotti G, et al: Com- Staging of Cancer (ed 3). Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, 1988, pp 81-83
bined chemotherapy, radiation and surgery for epithelial cancer of 28. John MJ: Grading of chemoradiation toxicity, in John MJ,
the anal canal. Cancer 57:525-529, 1986 Flam MS, Legha SS. et al (eds): Chemoradiation: an Integrated
14. Pipard G, Peytremann R, Marti MC: Conservative multidiscipli- Approach to Cancer Treatment. Philadelphia, PA, Lea & Febiger,
nary treatment of locally advanced epidermoid and cloacogenic cancer 1993, pp 601-606
of the anal canal. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 5:268, 1986 (abstr) 29. Wilcoxon F: Individual comparison by ranking methods. Bio-
15. Tiver KW, Langlands O: Synchronous chemotherapy and ra- metrics 1:80-83, 1945
diotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: Alternative to abdomino- 30. Kalbfleish JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure
perineal resection. Aust NZ J Surg 54:101-108, 1984 Time Data. New York, NY, Wiley, 1980
16. Sischy B, Doggett RLS, Krall JM, et al: Definitive irradiation 31. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incom-
and chemotherapy for radiosensitization in management of anal car- plete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457-481, 1958
cinoma: Interim report on RTOG study no. 8314. J Natl Cancer Inst 32. Cox DR: Analysis of Binary Data. London, United Kingdom,
81:850-856, 1989 Methuen, 1970