Caltech Catalog-1920-Section 1
Caltech Catalog-1920-Section 1
Caltech Catalog-1920-Section 1
Caltech 1
Catalog
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91125
(626) 395-6811
September 2019
While every effort has been made to ensure this catalog is accurate and up to
date when published, changes affecting the content of the catalog may occur
during the year. Accordingly, the Institute reserves the right to correct or change
its policies, rules, regulations, requirements for graduation, course offerings, and
any other contents of this catalog at any time. Current versions of Institute poli-
cies can be accessed at http://hr.caltech.edu/services/policies.
You can view the Caltech Catalog online at catalog.caltech.edu. Please note that
the contents of websites that link to online course entries are not part of the offi-
cial catalog.
Cover: XXXXXXX
CONTENTS 144 Energy Science and
Technology
145 Environmental Science
1. GENERAL INFORMATION and Engineering
2 149 Geological and Planetary
9 Introduction Sciences
9 Historical Sketch 150 History and Philosophy
10 Education and Research of Science
15 Jet Propulsion Laboratory 151 Humanities
16 Student Life 152 Information and Data
24 Student Wellness Sciences
Services 153 Information Science and
26 Caltech CARE Team Technology
26 Career Development 154 Interdisciplinary Studies
29 Caltech Alumni Program
Association 154 Materials Science
29 International Student 155 Mathematics
Programs 156 Mechanical Engineering
30 Auditing Courses 157 Medical Engineering
30 Grades and Grading 159 Microbiology
35 Notices and Agreements 159 Neurobiology
45 Code of Conduct 160 Physics
47 Institute Policies 163 Science and Engineering
110 Student Affairs Policies Communications
164 Social and Decision
Neuroscience
2. AREAS OF STUDY
164 Social Science
AND RESEARCH
168 Systems Biology
113 Aerospace
118 Applied and 3. INFORMATION FOR
Computational UNDERGRADUATE
Mathematics STUDENTS
119 Applied Mechanics
120 Applied Physics 171 Admission to the
121 Astrophysics Freshman Class
124 Biochemistry and 175 Admission to Upper
Molecular Biophysics Classes by Transfer
125 Bioengineering 179 Study Abroad
126 Biology 187 ROTC
128 Chemical Engineering 187 Registration Regulations
129 Chemistry 194 Scholastic Requirements
132 Civil Engineering 199 Undergraduate Expenses
133 Computation and Neural 204 Financial Aid
Systems 221 Prizes
134 Computer Science 232 Graduation
136 Computing and Requirements, All
Mathematical Sciences Options
137 Control and Dynamical
Systems
138 Electrical Engineering
Contents
4. INFORMATION FOR 612 Film
GRADUATE STUDENTS 612 Freshman Seminars
615 Geological and Planetary
323 Graduate Policies and Sciences
Procedures 633 History 3
339 General Requirements for 645 History and Philosophy
Graduate Degrees of Science
348 Graduate Expenses 657 Humanities
350 Financial Assistance 659 Information and Data
352 Prizes Sciences
360 Special Regulations of 663 Information Science and
Graduate Options Technology
663 Interdisciplinary Studies
Program
5. COURSES
663 Languages
669 Law
463 General Information
669 Materials Science
464 Aerospace
673 Mathematics
473 Anthropology
683 Mechanical Engineering
475 Applied and
691 Medical Engineering
Computational
694 Music
Mathematics
696 Neurobiology
482 Applied Mechanics
697 Performing and
484 Applied Physics
Visual Arts
490 Art History
700 Philosophy
490 Astrophysics
702 Physical Education
487 Biochemistry and
709 Physics
Molecular Biophysics
720 Political Science
498 Bioengineering
723 Psychology
504 Biology
727 Scientific and Engineering
520 Business, Economics,
Communications
and Management
729 Social Science
524 Chemical Engineering
734 Student Activities
531 Chemistry
735 Visual Culture
542 Civil Engineering
737 Writing
545 Computation and Neural
Systems
550 Computer Science 6. TRUSTEES,
564 Computing and ADMINISTRATION,
Mathematical Sciences AND FACULTY
566 Control and Dynamical
Systems 741 Officers
569 Economics 741 Board of Trustees
573 Electrical Engineering 746 Administrative Officers
587 Energy Science and 748 Faculty Officers and
Technology Committees
587 Engineering (General) 751 Staff of Instruction and
589 English Research
604 English as a Second 7790 Officers and Faculty
Language
605 Environmental Science 847 Index
and Engineering
Contents
ACADEMIC
December 14–January 5
Winter recess
CALENDAR December 18
Instructors’ final grade reports due—9
2019-2020 a.m.
4
December 25
First Term 2019 Christmas (Institute holiday)
September 19–20 December 27, 30–31
International student orientation Special release days and floating
holiday
September 22–29
New student check-in and orientation
for undergraduates
Second Term 2020
January 1
September 23–27
New Year’s Day (Institute holiday)
New student check-in and orientation
for graduate students January 6
Beginning of instruction—8 a.m.
September 26
Undergraduate Academic Standards January 7
and Honors Committee—1 p.m. Undergraduate Academic Standards
and Honors Committee—9 a.m.
October 1
Beginning of instruction—8 a.m. January 20
Martin Luther King Day (Institute hol-
October 18
iday)
Last day for adding courses and
removing conditions & incompletes January 24
Last day for adding courses and
October 30–November 5
removing conditions & incompletes
Midterm examination period
February 5–11
November 11
Midterm examination period
Midterm deficiency notices due—9
a.m. February 12
Faculty meeting—noon to 1 p.m.
November 13
Faculty meeting—noon to 1 p.m. February 17
Presidents’ Day (Institute holiday)
November 20
Last day for dropping courses, exer- February 18
cising pass/fail option, and changing Midterm deficiency notices due—9
sections a.m.
November 21–December 6 February 26
Registration for second term, 2019–20 Last day for dropping courses, exer-
cising pass/fail option, and changing
November 28–29
sections
Thanksgiving (Institute holiday)
February 27–March 11
December 6
Registration for third term, 2019-20
• Last day of classes
• Last day to register for second term, March 11
2019–20 without a $50 late fee • Last day of classes
• Last day to register for third term,
December 7-10
2019–20, without a $50 late fee
Study period
March 12–19
December 11*– 13
Study period
Final examinations, first term, 2019–20
March 16*–18
December 13
Final examinations, second term,
End of first term, 2019–20
2019–20
Academic Calendar
March 18 June 5
End of second term, 2019–2020 • Last day of classes—undergraduates
• Last day to register for first term,
March 19–29 2020–21, without a $50 late fee
Spring recess
June 6–9
March 23 Study period for undergraduates
5
Instructors’ final grades due—9 a.m.
June 8
Third Term 2020 Instructors’ final grade reports due for
seniors and graduate students—9 a.m
March 30
Beginning of instruction—8 a.m. June 10
Curriculum Committee—10 a.m.
March 31 Faculty meeting—2 p.m.-3 p.m.
Undergraduate Academic Standards
and Honors Committee—9 a.m. June 10*–12
Final examinations for undergraduates,
April 17 third term, 2019-20
Last day for adding courses and
removing conditions and incompletes June 12
Commencement—10 a.m. End of third
April 29–May 5 term, 2019–20
Midterm examination period
June 17
May 11 Instructors’ final grades due for under-
• Midterm deficiency notices due—9 graduates—9 a.m.
a.m.
• Last day for seniors to remove condi- June 24
tions and incompletes Undergraduate Academic Standards
and Honors Committee—9 a.m.
May 15
Last day for admission to candidacy July 4-5
for the degrees of Master of Science Independence Day (Institute holiday)
and Engineer, and for scheduling an
examination for the degree of Doctor Summer Term 2020
of Philosophy
June 15
May 20 Summer Term begins
Last day for dropping courses, exer-
cising pass/fail option, and changing September 1
sections Summer Term ends
Academic Calendar
6
Campus Map
7
Campus Directory
Section One
8 General
Information
General Information
INTRODUCTION
Caltech, founded in 1891, is a world-renowned science and engi-
neering institute that marshals some of the world’s brightest minds
and most innovative tools to address fundamental scientific ques- 9
tions and pressing societal challenges.
Caltech is small in size, but prizes excellence and ambition. Its
students receive an education that is notable for its rigorous curric-
ulum, close collaborations with faculty, and small class sizes.
Students graduate from Caltech prepared to become world
leaders in science, engineering, academia, industry, and public ser-
vice. Graduates are well trained in their ability to identify, analyze,
and solve challenging problems within and across science and
engineering disciplines, and are prepared to apply and communi-
cate their expertise broadly throughout their professional careers.
An independent, privately supported institution, Caltech also
manages the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) for NASA, and
Caltech also owns and operates the Seismological Laboratory,
more than 50 research centers and institutes, and a global network
of astronomical observatories, including the Palomar and W. M.
Keck Observatories; the Institute also co-founded and co-manages
the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO).
The Institute’s extraordinary faculty, students, postdoctoral
scholars, and staff produce transformative breakthroughs in fields
ranging from quantum science and engineering to bioinformatics
and the nature of life itself, from human behavior and economics to
energy and sustainability. Caltech faculty and alumni have earned
national and international recognition, including 39 Nobel Prizes.
Caltech is also an integral part of Pasadena. Together with JPL,
it is the city’s largest employer and a source of programs that ben-
efit the entire community.
To learn more about Caltech, visit www.caltech.edu/about.
HISTORICAL SKETCH
In September of 1891, Pasadena philanthropist Amos G. Throop
(pronounced Troop) established Throop University, the institution
that would eventually become Caltech.
Throop University opened its doors with 31 students and a
six-member faculty. Throop might have remained simply a good
local school had it not been for the arrival in Pasadena of astron-
omer George Ellery Hale. The first director of the Mount Wilson
Observatory, Hale became a member of Throop’s board of trustees
in 1907, and began molding the school into a first-class institution
for engineering and scientific research and education.
Hale would be joined later by chemist Arthur A. Noyes and
physicist Robert A. Millikan. These three scholars set the school on
the course it continues to follow to this day. By 1920, the school
was renamed the California Institute of Technology, and the enroll-
Introduction
ment was nine graduate students and 359 undergraduates, with a
faculty of 60; a decade later there were 138 graduate students, 510
undergraduates, and a faculty of 180. At the present time there are
nearly 1,000 undergraduates, 1,200 graduate students, and some
10 300 professorial faculty and 700 postdoctoral scholars.
Caltech has more than 24,000 living alumni all over the world,
many of them eminent in their fields of engineering, science, law,
medicine, academe, and entrepreneurship.
Caltech’s divisional structure, which began to coalesce in 1926,
today comprises the Division of Biology and Biological Engineering
(BBE); the Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
(CCE); the Division of Engineering and Applied Science (EAS); the
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS); the Division
of the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS); and the Division of
Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy (PMA). To learn more about
Caltech’s history and the people behind the Institute’s success,
visit archives.caltech.edu.
General Information
demic credit, and research for pay under a faculty member’s grant
or contract.
The senior thesis involves original research under the mentor-
ship of a faculty member, an effort that develops research, writing,
and presentation skills that together provide an excellent prepara- 11
tion for future graduate studies and/or professional life.
The SURF program provides continuing undergraduate students
the opportunity to work on an individual research project in a tuto-
rial relationship with a mentor, usually a member of the Caltech/
JPL research community, but occasionally a faculty member at
another college or university. The work is carried out during a
10-week period in the summer, after which SURF students submit
a written report describing the project, methods, and results of
their work.
Most options offer undergraduate research courses in order to
encourage research participation; students should consult listings
and descriptions of opportunities.
Learn more about undergraduate programs and research at
www.admissions.caltech.edu.
ACADEMIC PARTNERSHIPS
Caltech maintains an array of external partnerships with other
institutions in Southern California. These partnerships provide pre-
med students with opportunities to work in area hospitals and train
with practicing clinicians; allow students to participate in ROTC
through a joint program with USC; and offer a 3/2 dual degree for
students from 13 select liberal-arts colleges. Caltech undergrad-
uate students can cross-register at Occidental College and Art
Introduction
Center College of Design, and the Institute maintains relations with
research partners such as the Scripps Institution of Oceanography
at UCSD. Undergraduate students can also study abroad in
Cambridge, Copenhagen, Edinburgh, London, Paris, or Melbourne
12 during their junior or senior years. For graduate students, joint
programs between Caltech and both the USC Keck School of
Medicine and the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine grant
MD/PhD degrees.
FACULTY RESEARCH
The contributions of Caltech’s faculty have earned national and
international recognition. Caltech was elected to the Association
of American Universities (AAU) in 1934 and remains a research
university with “very high” research activity, primarily in STEM
fields. Research is central to Caltech, and the Institute manag-
es approximately $325 million in sponsored awards annually. Its
largest federal funding agencies are the National Aeronautics
Space Administration (NASA), National Science Foundation
(NSF), Department of Health and Human Services, Department
of Defense, and Department of Energy. Caltech faculty are highly
productive in the fields of applied physics, astronomy and astro-
physics, biology, biochemistry, biological engineering, chemical
engineering, computer science, geology, mechanical engineering,
and physics. More than 37 percent of faculty are members of the
National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and/or
are fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences—the
highest percentage of any faculty in the country with the exception
of Rockefeller University. Caltech receives more invention disclo-
sures per faculty member than any other university in the United
States.
General Information
Caltech, which seeks to deepen our understanding of the
brain and how it works;
• the Beckman Institute, which develops methods, instrumen-
tation, and materials for fundamental research in chemistry
and biology; 13
• the Kavli Nanoscience Institute, which advances cross-disci-
plinary research in the areas of nanoscience and nanotech-
nology;
• the Donna and Benjamin M. Rosen Bioengineering Center,
which encourages intensive, fruitful collaborations between
bioengineering researchers;
• the Resnick Sustainability Institute, which fosters advances
in energy science and technology through research, educa-
tion, and communication;
Learn more about Caltech’s research centers and institutes at
www.caltech.edu/research/centers-institutes.
Introduction
Caltech.
Learn more at www.ctlo.caltech.edu.
Libraries
The Caltech Library advances the Institute’s mission to expand
human knowledge by catalyzing information discovery and sharing.
The Library maintains extensive research collections, a variety of
study spaces, state-of-the-art knowledge management platforms,
and a user-focused program of instruction and outreach.
The Sherman Fairchild Library (SFL) is the main library on cam-
pus. SFL is open every day until midnight and offers a range of col-
laborative and private study spaces including five bookable group
study rooms and the TechLab, which houses several 3-D printers.
Laptops, kindles, and electronic kits can be borrowed through
the Library’s eDevice lending program. All textbooks assigned
for courses are available for short-term use through the Library’s
Course Reserves service. The Library’s interlibrary loan service,
DocuServe, is located on the first floor of SFL. Users can obtain
books and articles not owned by Caltech Library at no charge and
typically within 24 hours.
SFL is complemented by three branch libraries: Humanities
and Social Sciences (Dabney), Astrophysics (Cahill), and Geology
General Information
(North Mudd). In addition, the Lookout, a flexible collaboration
and study space with large displays is available on the 9th floor of
Millikan.
The Library’s digital repository of research by Caltech authors
includes CaltechTHESIS. 15
Visit the Library’s website, www.library.caltech.edu, to access
library collections and services or request research assistance from
the Library.
Avery House
Made possible by a gift from trustee R. Stanton Avery, this
undergraduate residence and innovative residential complex was
designed by Moore, Ruble, Yudell, and completed in September
1996. Located at the north end of the campus, Avery has an RLC,
two RAs, two faculty apartments, and rooms for about 136 under-
graduates. Its dining facilities, meeting rooms, lounges, and library
are designed to encourage informal faculty-student interaction
and to attract all members of the campus community to join in this
interaction. Avery hosts programs and social events that facilitate
involvement between residents and faculty in residence.
Bechtel Residence
Established in the fall of 2018 and located at the northeast edge of
campus, the Bechtel Residence is the first residence to open on
campus since 1996. With the opening of Bechtel, the Institute is
able, for the first time, to provide on-campus housing to all under-
graduates for the duration of their academic career. Bechtel is
General Information
named in honor of Caltech life trustee Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr., the
founder of the S. D. Bechtel Foundation.
The 95,000-square-foot residence is a multigenerational residence
open to all undergraduates with: 211 student bedrooms arranged
as singles and in suites; six RA and one RLC apartments; and two 17
faculty-in-residence apartments. Bechtel was intentionally designed
to provide the community with the greatest flexibility in maximizing
space as well as to encourage broader interaction, engagement, and
residential life programming among residents. The facility includes
three kitchens; eight common areas/study rooms; six laundry rooms;
a 400-seat dining hall and servery; and support spaces.
Hameetman Center
The Hameetman Center is a new campus center built on the
site of the former Winnett Student Center opening in 2019. The
Hameetman Center replaces Winnett as Caltech’s central commu-
nity gathering place. The 24,000-square-foot two-story center is
named in honor of the Hameetman Foundation and Caltech trust-
ee Fred Hameetman (BS ’62) and his wife, Joyce, who provided
the initial funding to initiate the design of the reimagined campus
hub. It features a large public lounge, an expanded Red Door
Marketplace, the Caltech Store, music rehearsal facilities, student
club rooms, a multipurpose room, and a conference room. The
rehearsal facility is made possible thanks to a gift from emeritus
professor of theoretical physics Steven Frautschi and his wife, Mie.
Residential Experience
The Office of Residential Experience (ORE) has responsibility for
the oversight of Caltech’s residential programs, including pro-
grams carried out in the undergraduate houses, graduate student
residences, and the Bechtel and Marks-Braun communities. The
ORE works collaboratively with the Residential Life Coordinators,
Resident Advisors, the Interhouse Committee, and other groups to
ensure that student leaders in all our residential communities are
trained and that there are programs in place to support their devel-
opment. This is part of the shared governance that is central to the
Caltech residential experience.
All residences and houses, including all their activities and
programs, are expected to comply with Institute policies, Student
Affairs policies, and the Caltech Code of Conduct. Potential
Policy or Code of Conduct violations by a house or residence
will be referred to the Caltech Routing committee. If the Routing
Committee determines that the incident(s) is part of a Residential
or House program or activity, it will be referred to ORE for further
action. In this case, the Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs
and Residential Experience (AVP) or her designee, will either (a)
Faculty-Student Relations
Faculty-student coordination and cooperation with regard to cam-
pus affairs are secured through the presence of students on faculty
committees, by faculty-student conferences, and by other mecha-
nisms.
Freshman Advisers
Each member of the freshman class is assigned a faculty adviser
and is a member of a small advising group. The adviser follows
the freshman’s progress and provides advice on any questions or
problems that the freshman may have.
General Information
Option Advisers
Each member of the three undergraduate upper classes is
assigned an option adviser, a faculty member in the option in
which the student is enrolled. The adviser takes an interest in the
student’s selection of courses and progress toward a degree, 19
and, eventually, in assisting the student toward satisfactory place-
ment in industry or in graduate school. Normally, the association
between student and adviser is established before the beginning of
the sophomore year and continues through graduation.
Interhouse Activities
The president of each undergraduate house represents that house
on the Interhouse Committee (IHC), which helps to handle matters
affecting the houses, in conjunction with staff from Student Affairs.
The IHC works in conjunction with the APER department to con-
duct intramural competitions as described above, and conducts
20 ASCIT
The undergraduate student body forms the membership of a
corporation known as the Associated Students of the California
Institute of Technology, Inc., or ASCIT. Governed by a board of
directors consisting of six elected officers, it is involved in many
aspects of student life; oversees publication of the The Tech, our
undergraduate student newspaper; the Big T yearbook; a literary
magazine called Totem; and the Little T, which provides lots of
helpful information to incoming students. A directory, along with
other student information, such as campus positions, links to
the Interhouse Committee (IHC) and Academics and Research
Committee (ARC), and other helpful information is available online
at Donut.caltech.edu.
Besides overseeing student publications and coordinating activi-
ties and policies, the ASCIT Board of Directors administers the cor-
poration’s finances. ASCIT sponsors a wide variety of special-inter-
est clubs and programs working closely with Student Activities and
Programs part of the Office of Residential Experience. The student
government is active in campus affairs. The student members of
standing faculty committee ensure that undergraduate opinion is
considered seriously. Excellent informal relations between students
and faculty and between students and administration promote
discussion of mutual concern and goodwill. Student-faculty confer-
ences are held every other year and serve to promote communica-
tion mainly around academic topics.
Honor System
The Honor Code, embodied in the phrase “No member shall take
unfair advantage of any other member of the Caltech communi-
ty,” is the fundamental principle of conduct for all students and
extends to all phases of campus life, including scholastic and
extracurricular activities, relations among students, and relations
between students and faculty. The Honor System is the most
important tradition of the undergraduate student body. The Board
of Control, which is composed of elected student representa-
General Information
tives, is charged with monitoring the academic Honor System for
undergraduates, investigating course work violations, and making
recommendations to the dean of undergraduate students. The
Conduct Review Committee, composed of students, faculty and
staff, hears cases involving non-academic Honor System and 21
Institute policy violations for undergraduate students, and also
makes recommendations to the dean. At their discretion, the Dean
of Undergraduate Students, or their designee, may directly handle
a matter also involving the Honor System, the Code of Conduct,
and Institute Policies for undergraduate students.
The Honor System is also an important part of graduate student
life. The dean of graduate studies is responsible for reviewing
and making decisions concerning alleged honor code violations
with respect to course-work. The Graduate Honor Council (GHC)
serves as a consultative resource to the dean. At their discretion,
the dean of graduate studies may request that the GHC investigate
and hear a case, and provide its recommendations to the dean
for final review and decision. All Members of the Graduate Honor
Council must be in good standing with the Office of Graduate
Studies and must attend a formal training before they may serve on
a case. Examples of honor code violations include, but are not lim-
ited to, plagiarism, violations of the collaboration policy in a class
and/or using resources that were strictly prohibited for homework
and/or exams. Incidents that are not handled by the dean of grad-
uate studies include accusations of researchmisconduct, which are
handled by the Office of Research Compliance; grade disputes,
which are handled by the office of the provost. InstitutePolicy vio-
lations are handled by the office of the dean of graduate studies or
the appropriate administrative organization.
General Information
Caltech Center for Diversity (CCD)
The Caltech Center for Diversity (CCD) mission is to provide edu-
cation, advocacy, and allyship in order to increase institutional and
personal capacity for diversity and ensure a community committed
to equity and inclusive excellence. We create and implement cam- 23
pus-wide initiatives and programs that will increase the knowledge,
skills, and attitudes for all members of the Caltech community to
thrive in a diverse world.
Awareness and Education. We are committed to building the
capacity for cultural competencies, skills, and action by designing
workshops and trainings appropriate for all constituents on cam-
pus. We value consistent assessment and formative feedback to
facilitate sustainable and lasting change.
Advocacy through Collaboration. We actively engage with the
Caltech community to promote and provide access to information
and resources that help achieve our academic and personal goals.
The CCD provides programs and services to meet the specific
needs of racially underrepresented groups, women, all sexual and
gender identities (LGBTQ+), underserved, and ally communities on
campus.
Allyship. We create spaces and skill building opportunities for all
members of the community to engage with issues related to their
multiple identities. We provide resources and promote an environ-
ment that is supportive for all.
If you are interested in getting involved with CCD, please check
the center website: www.diversitycenter.caltech.edu.
The Caltech Y
The Caltech Y is a unique nonprofit organization on campus.
Founded by students for students, the Y challenges the Caltech
community to see the world with a broader perspective and a deep-
er understanding of social issues. Through community service proj-
ects, outdoor adventures, social activities, and cultural events, the
Y encourages students to become active participants during their
years here. The Caltech Y helps students plan events, meetings, and
initiatives on campus and provides the resources and equipment
needed for successful programs. Some of the many Y-sponsored
activities include the Y hike in the California Sierras, Alternative
Spring Break, Make-a-Difference-Day, World Fest, the Social
Activism Speaker Series, and the D.C. Science Policy Trip. The Y
also provides services to the Caltech community, such as low-cost
rentals on camping equipment, discounted tickets, and much more.
Religious Observation
Caltech has a quiet room for prayer, mediation, quiet reflection and
religious observation. The quiet room is located in the Hameetman
Student Center. For information about religious clubs, see the
Student Clubs website at ore.caltech.edu.
General Information
regardless of insurance coverage, are eligible for basic medical and
psychological care, crisis counseling, and occupational therapy
at Student Wellness Services, through payment of the health fee.
Students who require specialty or longer-term care beyond the
scope of what Student Health Services provides will be referred to 25
community providers using their health insurance; costs associated
with this care are the responsibility of the student.
A full description of the range of services and programs
offered by Student Wellness Services can be found at
http://wellness.caltech.edu.
HEALTH FORMS
Prior to initial registration, each admitted student is required to
submit entrance health forms that include medical and immuniza-
tion history. Information regarding immunization requirements and
the completion of the health forms are posted on the New and
Prospective Student website (http://wellness.caltech.edu/resourc-
es/new-students). Matriculating students will receive access to the
Student Health Portal to enable secure online upload of the forms.
Health forms must be received no later than August 15, 2019.
Failure to meet this requirement will result in a registration hold,
and students will be unable to register for winter term classes until
clearance is complete.
Libraries
CALTECH CARE TEAM
GENERAL INFORMATION
26
The CARE Team is a multidisciplinary group of professional staff
from key areas of the Institute. Each member brings knowledge
and expertise in their field, including mental health, crisis inter-
vention, student development, staff consultation, campus secu-
rity, academic support, and residential life. The CARE Team also
collaborates with many other entities across campus including
athletics, the Equity Office and Title IX, the Center for Diversity,
Student Faculty Programs, International Student Programs, and the
academic divisions.
The CARE Team connects students with resources and support.
Through early identification of academic difficulties, social con-
cerns, behavioral disruptions, and health issues, the CARE Team
can partner with students to create individualized plans to help
mitigate crises and promote success. The behaviors listed below,
especially when more than one are present, may be signs of dis-
tress:
The CARE Team will collaborate with the referring party to cre-
ate a support plan, which may include outreach, academic or per-
sonal counseling, referral to campus support services, and other
relevant resources.
Referrals to the CARE Team can be made at: caltechcares.
caltech.edu
CAREER DEVELOPMENT
CAREER SERVICES
The Career Development Center (CDC) provides assistance to stu-
dents in the areas of career planning and employment. Assistance
is available in areas such as career choice, résumé preparation,
interviewing, graduate school application, and job search strate-
General Information
gies. Career and vocational interest tests can also be taken on the
recommendation of one of the career counseling staff members.
GENERAL INFORMATION
27
All students are encouraged to visit and make use of the Career
Development Center early in their student careers.
WALK-IN COUNSELING
Several days a week, students can “walk in” to consult with a
career counselor without an appointment. This allows students to
deal with time-sensitive or quickly answered concerns without hav-
ing to make an appointment.
CAREER FAIRS
Each year two career fairs are organized by the CDC and held in
October and January. A diverse range of companies send repre-
sentatives to campus to talk to Caltech undergraduates, graduate
students, and postdoctoral scholars about permanent employment,
summer jobs, or internship opportunities with students. Many firms
hold information sessions and conduct on-campus interviews.
General Information
At the M.S. degree level, about 90 percent continue in graduate
school, and the remainder accept employment. Of those receiving
the Ph.D. degree, about 60 percent accept postdoctoral, faculty or
other academic/research positions, about 40 percent pursue posi-
tions in areas such as national laboratories, industry, STEM teach- 29
ing, public policy, etc.
General Information
and units for the course remain on the record. Grades other than E,
I and W are assumed to be based on work completed and evaluat-
ed at the time of grade submission.
E and I Grades 31
E Grades. At their discretion, instructors may give students who
have not completed their work for a course by the end of the term
a grade of E. The grade E indicates deficiencies that may be made
up without repeating the course. If the instructor does not specify
a date on the grade report sheet for completion of the work, stu-
dents receiving an E will have until Add Day of the following term
to complete their work for that course. Instructors may, however,
require the work for the course to be completed by an earlier date.
In addition, students should be aware that E grades can impact
ability to meet eligibility requirements. If an E grade impacts a
student’s academic standing, the grade may be due by the first
day of classes. See section Scholastic Requirements for additional
information.
If a student receives an E and does not complete the work by
the date specified by the instructor or by Add Day (or a different
date specified by the instructor), the grade will be changed to an F.
Adequate time must be afforded to instructors to grade the work
and to submit the final grade to the registrar.
It is the responsibility of a student receiving an E to confirm that
the registrar has recorded the terms for satisfying the completion
of the work in the course.
With the written permission of the instructor, a student may
extend the E grade past Add Day of the following term, but doing
so will cause an additional E grade to be registered. Each addition-
al extension of the E will be until the date specified by the instruc-
tor or until Add Day of the following term, but in each case will
require the written permission of the instructor and the registering
of an additional E grade.
E Count Limitations. After an undergraduate student has
been awarded the grade of E six times, he or she is not eligible
to receive E grades in any subsequent term. A petition for an E
in a subsequent term may be approved by the Undergraduate
Academic Standards and Honors (UASH) Committee in an excep-
tional case. Such a petition requires the support of the instructor
and the dean or associate dean of undergraduate students.
I Grades. The grade I is given only in case of sickness or other
emergency that justifies noncompletion of the work at the usual
time. It is given at the discretion of the instructor, after approval
by the dean or associate dean of students or the dean of graduate
studies. The time period within which the grade of I is to be made
up should be indicated on the grade sheet, or students receiv-
ing an I will have until Add Day of the following term to complete
their work for the course. In addition, students should be aware
that I grades can impact ability to meet eligibility requirements.
Undergraduate Research
If an I grade impacts a student’s academic standing, the grade
may be due by the first day of classes. See section Scholastic
Requirements for additional information.
Students receiving grades of E or I should consult with their
32 instructors, and one of the deans, at the time of issue regard-
ing the work required and the time allowed. This time should,
in most cases, coincide with the date fixed in the calendar for
removal of conditions and incompletes (Add Day), and in fact if
no other time is specified, this date will be assumed. However,
except under extraordinary circumstances, the time for the com-
pletion of the work will not be extended beyond one year after
the date in which the grade of E or I was given. In the absence
of an earlier deadline, an E will turn into an F one year after the
date on which the E was given, and an I grade will turn into a W
(standing for “withdrawn”) one year after the date on which the I
grade was given. Waiving of this one year rule is done in only the
most exceptional of circumstances and requires the agreement,
before that one year anniversary, of the Dean of Undergraduate
Students, Chair of UASH, and Executive Officer of the depart-
ment in which the course was taken.
Grades of E and I shall not be considered in calculating a stu-
dent’s grade-point average.
Grade-Point Average
Grade-point average is computed by dividing the total number of
credits earned in a term or an academic year by the total number
of units taken in the corresponding period. Units for which a grade
General Information
of F has been received are counted, even though the course may
have subsequently been repeated. Grades of P or F obtained in
courses graded on a pass/fail basis are not included in computing
grade-point average.
Each course at the Institute is assigned a number of units cor- 33
responding to the total number of hours per week devoted to that
subject, including classwork, laboratory, and the normal outside
preparation. Credits are awarded as shown in the table below.
No. of
Units A+ A A– B+ B B– C+ C C– D+ D F
1 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 0
2 9 8 7 7 6 5 5 4 3 3 2 0
3 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 0
4 17 16 15 13 12 11 9 8 7 5 4 0
5 22 20 18 17 15 13 12 10 8 7 5 0
6 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 0
7 30 28 26 23 21 19 16 14 12 9 7 0
8 35 32 29 27 24 21 19 16 13 11 8 0
9 39 36 33 30 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 0
10 43 40 37 33 30 27 23 20 17 13 10 0
11 48 44 40 37 33 29 26 22 18 15 11 0
12 52 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 16 12 0
13 56 52 48 43 39 35 30 26 22 17 13 0
14 61 56 51 47 42 37 33 28 23 19 14 0
15 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 0
Student Life
• All research courses shall be designated “graded pass/fail.’’
All reading courses, seminar courses, or other courses that
do not have a formal class structure shall be designated
“graded pass/fail’’ unless the option secures an exemption
34 from the Curriculum Committee or the Graduate Studies
Committee and from the Faculty Board.
• A grade on the pass/fail system should be P if it would have
been a D or better on the letter grade system. (Note that
there is no D– grade.) The standards of failure in courses in
which only pass/fail grades are used should be the same as
they would be if the course were letter graded.
• Any instructor may, at his or her discretion, specify prior to
registration that his or her course, if not classified by the
above regulations, is to be graded on a “letter grades only’’
basis or is to be graded pass/fail only, subject to possible
review by the responsible option. The registrar must be noti-
fied of such specification two weeks before the beginning of
registration. (Note: If the grading scheme is changed during
the term, it is changed for everyone.)
• Each term, any student may select, subject to requirements
imposed by the student’s option, two elective courses in
which he or she is to be graded on a pass/fail basis if the
course is not designated as “letter grades only’’ and is not
specifically required for the degree in his or her option. To
make this election, a completed Pass/Fail Course Selection
Card must be submitted to the Registrar’s Office on or
before Drop Day. This election may be reversed or reinstat-
ed at any time before the deadline. The election must be
approved and the card signed by the student’s adviser. The
instructor must be notified and should sign the card to indi-
cate that this has been done; the instructor must allow any
eligible student to make this election.
• Of the units offered to satisfy the requirements for the
Bachelor of Science degree, no more than 90 may be in
courses graded pass/fail because of the student’s election
(this does not include those courses taken in the first two
terms freshmen year or those designated pass/fail by the
instructor, option, or curriculum committee).
General Information
was issued, the student should contact the academic mediator,
appointed by the provost, who will work with the student and
instructor to resolve the problem. If the mediation effort is unsat-
isfactory to the student, he or she may request a formal review by
an appropriate executive officer or academic officer. The executive 35
officer will review the case and report the decision in writing to the
student. If the executive officer decides that a change of grade is
warranted, or if the student requests a further appeal, these shall
be requested of the division chair. At the discretion of the division
chair, a committee may be appointed to review the case. The com-
mittee members should interview everyone involved in the case
(the student, the course instructor, the teaching assistant, and any-
one else with relevant information), and make a written recommen-
dation to the division chair. Only the division chair can authorize
the registrar to enter a new grade in the student’s transcript.
Student Life
The grading system of the Institute is A+ (excellent) to F (failed).
An A+ is equivalent to 4.3 and an F to 0.0. A student must main-
tain a grade-point average of 1.9 in any term in order to be able
to enroll in a successive term at the Institute. A minimum 1.9
36 overall grade-point average is required for graduation. A student
who drops below the required average (1.9 for a given term) is
dismissed and must petition for reinstatement. A student may be
reinstated by the Undergraduate Academic Standards and Honors
Committee and, if so, is required to earn a 1.9 GPA during the
immediately following term. The Veterans Administration is notified
when a veteran is academically dismissed or is making unsatisfac-
tory progress toward a degree. Since the Institute requires all stu-
dents to carry a minimum full load that corresponds to 12 quarter
hours each term, any student who finishes a term in good standing
is considered to have made satisfactory progress. If a student
withdraws from a course before the final date for withdrawal, no
grade is given in that course. The time spent in school counts,
however, and the student may be considered to have not made
satisfactory progress in the event of such withdrawal.
In order to withdraw from any course, a student must submit a
withdrawal card. This shows the date on which the student was
last in official attendance in that course. If a student reenrolls in
that course and successfully completes it, that fact will be noted
on his or her official transcript.
General Information
disciplinary or grievance committee, or assisting another
Institute official in performing his or her tasks. An Institute
official has a legitimate educational interest if he or she
needs to review an educational record in order to fulfill his
or her professional responsibility. They are available to the 37
registrar, provost, president, general counsel, vice president
for development and institute relations, vice president for
student affairs, dean of graduate studies, dean of under-
graduate students, director of financial aid, and faculty of the
Institute and their respective staffs for the normal academic
and business purposes of the Institute. Records involv-
ing financial aid are maintained by the director of financial
aid, and are available to the director and staff, to the dean
of graduate studies and staff, to the Faculty Committee
on Scholarships and Financial Aid, and to the Faculty
Committee on Graduate Study, for the purpose of grant-
ing and administering the Institute’s financial aid program.
Except as authorized by federal or state law or regulation,
none of these education records nor any personally-identifi-
able information contained therein, other than directory infor-
mation (see below), may be made available to anyone else,
other than the student, without the consent of the student.
Where the student consents to disclosure of personally-iden-
tifiable information from the student’s education records and
Caltech chooses to disclose such information, if the student
so requests, the Institute will provide the student with a copy
of the records disclosed. The Institute will maintain a record
of each request for access to and each disclosure of person-
ally-identifiable information from the education records of a
student, as required by applicable federal law or regulation.
2. Students are allowed access to their educational records as
follows: A student may inspect and review his or her aca-
demic transcript during normal working hours. To inspect
and review other records, the student must provide a written
request to the registrar or to the director of financial aid or
to the dean of graduate studies or to the dean of under-
graduate students, or their designees, as appropriate. A
mutually-convenient time will be arranged within 45 days
after receipt of the request for the student to inspect and
review the records in his or her file. At that time the student
may examine all educational records in the file with the
exception of those specifically exempted by Part 99 of Title
34 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If circumstances
effectively prevent the student from exercising their right to
review their education records, the Institute will make other
arrangements. If a student believes the educational records
relating to the student contain information that is inaccurate,
misleading, or in violation of the student’s rights of priva-
cy, the student may ask the Institute to amend the record.
Student Life
The Institute will decide whether to amend the records
as requested within a reasonable time after receiving the
request. If the registrar, or the director of financial aid, or
the dean of graduate studies, or the dean of undergraduate
38 students, or their designees, decide not to amend the record
as requested, the student will be informed of the decision
and of his or her right to a hearing. The student will have, on
request, an opportunity for a hearing to challenge the con-
tent of the records on the grounds that the information con-
tained in the records is inaccurate, misleading or in violation
of the privacy rights of the student. To request a hearing, the
student must submit a written request to the vice president
for student affairs or his or her designee. The vice president
for student affairs or his/her designee will schedule such a
hearing within a reasonable time after receipt of the request
and will notify the student at a time reasonably in advance of
the hearing of its date, time, and place. The student will be
afforded a full and fair opportunity to present evidence rele-
vant to the issues raised and may be assisted or represented
by individuals of his or her choice at his or her own expense,
including an attorney. The decision of the vice president or
designee will be in writing, will be rendered within a reason-
able time after the conclusion of the hearing, and will be
final. This decision will be based solely upon the evidence
presented at the hearing and will include a summary of the
evidence and of the reasons for the decision. If, as a result
of the hearing, the Institute decides that the information is
inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the priva-
cy rights of the student, the Institute will amend the record
accordingly, and inform the student of the amendment in
writing. However, if, as a result of the hearing, the Institute
decides that the information is not inaccurate, misleading,
or otherwise in violation of the privacy rights of a student, it
will inform the student of the right to place in the educational
records a statement commenting on the information in the
records and/or setting forth any reasons for disagreeing with
the decision of the Institute. If the Institute places a state-
ment in the education records of the student, the Institute
will maintain the statement with the contested part of the
record for as long as the record is maintained and will dis-
close the statement whenever it discloses the portion of the
record to which the statement relates.
3. The Institute considers the following to be directory informa-
tion: a student’s name, UID, addresses (permanent, campus
and local/off-campus, and email), associated telephone
listings, ID photograph, date and place of birth, major field
of study, year in school, current enrollment status, expected
date of graduation, name of academic adviser, participation
in officially recognized activities and sports, weight and
General Information
height if a member of an athletic team, dates of attendance,
degrees and awards received, thesis title, hometown, and
most recently attended educational agency or institution.
Directory information may be made available to requestors
at the Institute’s discretion. Any student may, however, have 39
part or all of this information withheld by notifying the regis-
trar in writing. That information will then be withheld for the
balance of that academic year. If the information is to be
withheld in subsequent years, new requests must be filed.
4. A student will not be required to waive any rights regarding
access to educational records. However, a student may vol-
untarily waive in writing right of access to confidential state-
ments made by third parties respecting admission to educa-
tional agencies or institutions, applications for employment,
or the receipt of an honor or honorary recognition. In case
of waiver, the confidential statements will be used solely for
the purposes for which they were specifically intended, and
the student will, upon request, be notified of the names of
all persons making such confidential statements. If a student
should desire to waive right of access, he or she may con-
tact the registrar for more information.
5. The Institute reserves the right to destroy from time to time
any and all educational records that it maintains on a stu-
dent, except to the extent that the law requires their mainte-
nance for a longer period of time. However, where access to
records has been requested, no destruction of those records
will be allowed to take place until such access has been
granted or denied.
6. Students who believe their rights under FERPA may have
been violated may file a complaint with the Family Policy
Compliance Office, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW, Washington D.C. 20202-4605.
Transcripts of Records
A student, or former student, may request that official transcripts of
his or her records be forwarded to designated institutions or indi-
viduals. Requests should be filed at the Registrar’s Office at least
five days before the date on which the transcripts are to be mailed.
General Information
locating the student. Caltech has a Missing Student Policy
that guides the response of the Institute and cooperation
with law enforcement and other officials.
5. Significant disruption to the campus community.
The emergency contact, parent(s) or guardian of a student 41
may be notified if the student is behaving in a way that is
substantially disruptive to the campus community, there is
reason to believe the student is at risk of harming them-
selves or others, or is placed under arrest or charged with a
crime related to conduct on campus.
6. Repeated or flagrant violations of the Substance Abuse Policy.
Caltech administrators may contact parent(s) or guardian
if a student under the age of 21 is found responsible for
serious or repeated violations of Institute policy related
to the possession, use or distribution of alcohol or drugs.
Consideration in these situations will be given to the follow-
ing conditions: the violation involved harm or threat of harm
to self, others or property; the violation involved an arrest
in which the student was taken into custody; the violation
resulted in or could result in the student being suspended
and/or removed from an Institute residence; the student has
shown a pattern of violations; the student required urgent
medical intervention as a result of consumption of alcohol
and/or drugs.
7. Student death.
In the event of a student death, Caltech administrators will
cooperate with law enforcement, the coroner, medical per-
sonnel, and any other relevant officials who will provide offi-
cial notification to the deceased student’s next of kin.
Career Development
The Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. (111
Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD 21202-4012; 410-347-7700),
has accredited Caltech’s B.S. program in mechanical engineering.
Further, the Committee on Professional Training of the American
42 Chemical Society has approved Caltech’s B.S. program in chemistry.
The documents describing these accreditations and authoriza-
tions are on file and may be inspected in the Registrar’s Office and
the Provost’s Office; the office of the Division of Engineering and
Applied Science also has the documentation for ABET.
General Information
phone: (916) 431-6959; fax: (916) 263-1897. Prospective students
may contact WASC or the BPPE with complaints as well.
General Information
STUDENT EVENTS
Caltech is committed to providing its students, faculty and staff
with an environment that promotes safe and responsible social
interaction. Caltech recognizes that student activities are an
45
important part of campus life. Students are required to follow Event
Planning Procedures: studentaffairs.caltech.edu/policies.
CODE OF CONDUCT
THE CALTECH COMMUNITY’S STATEMENT
ON ETHICAL CONDUCT
We are all part of the Caltech community whether we are located
on campus, at JPL, at observatories or anywhere else in the uni-
verse. As members of the Caltech community, we expect that each
of us will embody the high standards that have gained Caltech its
worldwide reputation. In 2012, members representing the Caltech
community began a conversation on ethical conduct. These dis-
cussions focused on the overarching values of our community. As
a result of these discussions, we describe, in detail, these values in
11 short statements.
46 6. Commit to Education
• The opportunity for excellence in education exists at all lev-
els and in formal and informal ways that benefit students,
employees, and members of our community.
• We are committed to being great educators—as leaders,
mentors, and friends—not only of our students, but also of
our community, our peers and colleagues, and ourselves.
General Information
• We are ambassadors and advocates, embodying the high
standards that we set for ourselves and to which we are
held by others.
• We are committed to the Institute and its mission recognizing
that our actions as individuals reflect on Caltech. 47
INSTITUTE POLICIES
ACCEPTABLE USE OF ELECTRONIC
INFORMATION RESOURCES
Caltech provides electronic information resources (including, but
not limited to, computers, computer accounts and services, net-
works, software, electronic mail services, electronic information
sources, video and voice services, servers, web pages, cellular
phones and related services) to assist members of the Caltech
community in the pursuit of education and research. This policy,
in conjunction with other applicable Caltech policies, sets forth the
acceptable use of all electronic information resources owned or
managed by Caltech, and describes the rights and responsibilities
of Caltech and of faculty, staff, students, and other members of the
Caltech community with respect to the use of these resources.
Electronic information resources provided by Caltech are intend-
ed to be used to carry out the legitimate business of Caltech,
although some incidental personal use is permitted. Faculty, staff,
students, and other members of the Caltech community (“users”)
who use Caltech’s electronic information resources should be
guided by the Caltech Code of Conduct. Passwords issued to
users are for their use only and are not to be shared with others.
Users assume responsibility for the appropriate use of Caltech’s
electronic information resources and agree to comply with all rel-
evant Caltech policies and all applicable local, state, and federal
laws. Examples of inappropriate or unauthorized use of Caltech’s
electronic information resources include:
• sending a communication or using electronic information
resources, including web pages, that illegally discriminate
against, harass, defame, or threaten individuals or organiza-
tions;
• engaging in illegal conduct or conduct that violates Caltech
policy;
General Information
to personal messages or files stored on electronic information
resources owned and managed by Caltech.
While Caltech does not routinely examine the content of elec-
tronic mail messages or otherwise monitor individual usage, it does
routinely monitor the normal operation of computing and network- 49
ing resources, including network activity patterns, system logs,
general and individual usage patterns, and other indicia necessary
to ensure the integrity and stability of its electronic information
resources. Caltech will investigate suspected abuse, misuse, or
compromise of its resources, systems and services.
Caltech typically does not access the content of electronic mes-
sages or other data, files, or records generated, stored, or main-
tained on its electronic information resources; however, it retains
the right to inspect, review, or retain the content of any such mes-
sages, data, files, and records at any time without prior notification.
Any such action will be taken for reasons Caltech, within its discre-
tion, deems to be legitimate. These legitimate reasons may include,
but are not limited to, responding to lawful subpoenas or court
orders; investigating misconduct (including research misconduct);
determining compliance with Caltech policies and the law; and
locating electronic messages, data, files, or other records relat-
ed to these purposes. Users must therefore understand that any
electronic messages, data, files, and other records generated by,
stored, or maintained on Caltech electronic information resources
may be electronically accessed, reconstructed, or retrieved by
Caltech even after they have been deleted.
Caltech access to the content of electronic mail, data, files, or
other records generated, stored, or maintained by any user for
reasons such as those described in the previous paragraph must
be authorized as follows: (1) by the Provost for any situations
that require access to electronic materials associated with fac-
ulty and other academic personnel; (2) by the Vice President of
Administration and Chief Financial Officer for staff and postdoctor-
al scholars at campus or the JPL Director for Human Resources
for employees and postdoctoral scholars at JPL; (3) by the Vice
President for Student Affairs for students; or (4) by the General
Counsel for the purposes of complying with legal process and
requirements or to preserve user electronic information for possible
subsequent access in accordance with this policy. In all cases, the
Office of the General Counsel should be consulted prior to making
a decision on whether to grant access. In the case of a time-crit-
ical matter, if the authorizing official is unavailable for a timely
response, the General Counsel may authorize access.
In conclusion, the use of Caltech electronic information resourc-
es is a privilege, not a right, and Caltech may revoke this privilege
or decline to extend this privilege at any time. Inappropriate use of
Caltech resources may result in administrative discipline up to and
including separation from Caltech. Suspected illegal acts involving
Caltech electronic information resources may be reported to state
General Information
conducted in the United States. This exclusion allows most of the
activities conducted at Caltech to be performed without the need
of an export license. However, there are certain activities and infor-
mation that are not covered by the fundamental research exclusion
and remain subject to the export control laws and regulations. 51
Examples of these are:
1. Receipt by Caltech of third-party export controlled informa-
tion which requires that appropriate measures be taken to
ensure that the information is properly safeguarded. Under
certain conditions, the disclosure of specific information
and the provision of specific types of services to foreign
persons (non-U.S. citizens, non-legal permanent residents,
or non-U.S. legal entities) inside the United States (“deemed
exports”);
2. Travel abroad: Engaging in specific activities with persons
and entities abroad, even if the information relied upon is
publicly available;
3. The export of controlled items and information outside the
United States including: controlled hardware, software and
technology; and
4. Financial transactions or other dealings involving prohibited
parties or sanctioned countries.
1.0 Policy
The mission of Caltech is to expand human knowledge and benefit
society through research integrated with education. In pursuit of
this mission, Caltech adheres to the Eleven Principles comprising
its code of conduct and strives for the highest level of integrity and
public confidence. Caltech’s integrity rests on the personal integ-
rity of each of us who is called upon to act on behalf of Caltech.
Caltech is committed to ensuring that decisions made on its behalf
reflect the highest ethical standards and that its research and
instruction remain a rigorous and open inquiry, unencumbered by
conflicts of interest, real or perceived, that might affect the sound
judgment of its trustees, officers, senior management, faculty, stu-
dents, postdoctoral scholars, and staff. Each of us, therefore, is
responsible for identifying and resolving conflicts between personal
and institutional interests. We each must act in the best interests of
Caltech and refrain from taking part in any transaction where we do
not believe in good faith that we can act impartially.
Individual conflicts of interest may affect Caltech’s trustees,
officers, faculty, postdoctoral scholars, or staff. An individual con-
flict of interest is a situation that may compromise an individual’s
professional judgment in carrying out Institute business due to an
external relationship that directly or indirectly affects the interest of
the individual or an immediate family member. Each situation that
presents a potential for conflict of interest must be fully disclosed
to Caltech, and managed or eliminated before moving forward.
Conflicts of interest also include conflicts of commitment which
are situations in which external activities, either paid or unpaid,
interfere with an employee’s primary obligation and commitment
to Caltech. Caltech faculty, staff and postdoctoral scholars are
General Information
required to complete Caltech’s Conflict of Interest Disclosure form
on an annual basis and to submit changes or additions within 30
days of a new interest, activity or change.
In academic research, the term conflict of interest refers espe-
cially to situations in which financial or other personal consider- 53
ations may compromise, or may have the appearance of compro-
mising, an investigator’s professional judgment in conducting or
reporting research. The bias can affect collection, analysis, and
interpretation of data, hiring of staff, and procurement of materials,
sharing of results, choice of protocol, and the use of statistical
methods. Conflicts of interest can affect all scholarly fields.
Caltech has established these conflict of interest policies and
procedures that apply to all Caltech employees, including faculty,
to ensure compliance with Caltech’s ethical standards as well as
with the laws, rules, and regulations that govern Institute activities,
while fostering and sustaining an environment of openness and
integrity.
General Information
dren. The employment of relatives as that term is defined in
Personnel Memorandum (PM 9), is subject to the conditions
and restrictions described in PM 9, including the requirement
to complete the Nepotism Evaluation process whenever a
relative of an employee is considered for employment in the 55
same organization as the employee.
General Information
nomic development activities, the institution’s obligations as
a charitable organization receiving preferential tax treatment,
and the institution’s perception of its teaching, research,
and academic missions all impact how potential conflicts of
interest are managed. The examples and issues presented 57
below do not necessarily constitute inappropriate conflicts
of interest. Each situation must be judged on the facts and
merits of the relationship with an eye to what reasonable
individuals outside Caltech might consider to be appropri-
ate. Any activity, financial and/or operational, that may bring
into question Caltech’s reputation, integrity, and objectivity
should be considered for possible conflicts of interest. The
following are examples of potential situations that may give
rise to institutional conflicts of interest:
Code of Conduct
DISABILITY AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
1.0 Policy
58 It is Caltech’s policy to comply fully with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), the Rehabilitation Act, and other applicable
federal and state laws to ensure equal opportunity for otherwise
qualified individuals with disabilities, including disabled veterans.
Caltech does not discriminate based on physical or mental dis-
abilities, and is committed to ensuring that there is no unlawful
discrimination or harassment in any of its academic or employment
programs, services, activities, or in any terms and conditions of
employment.
As required by law, Caltech will make reasonable accommo-
dations to otherwise qualified individuals with known disabilities
including students, faculty, postdoctoral scholars, staff, volunteers,
interns and job applicants to ensure equal employment opportuni-
ties and equal access to Caltech educational programs, services,
activities and facilities unless doing so would constitute an undue
hardship or a fundamental alteration. Caltech also will provide
reasonable accommodations to employees with pregnancy-related
conditions consistent with federal and state law.
Caltech also, as appropriate, will conduct a fair, timely, and thor-
ough investigation into complaints within the scope of this Policy to
determine what occurred and take reasonable steps to remedy the
effects of any discrimination and prevent recurrence of the behav-
ior. Caltech provides all parties with appropriate due process and
reaches reasonable conclusions based on the evidence collected.
Caltech takes appropriate action, including disciplinary measures,
when warranted.
General Information
ADA Coordinator for Faculty:
Stacey Scoville, 626-395-6320
Administrator to the Provost
ADA Coordinator for Staff and Postdoctoral Scholars
59
Campus
Rose Murillo, 626-395-5930
Disability and Leave Manager
JPL
Veronica Jarquin, 818-354-6146
Human Resources Consultant
Institute Policies
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND SAFETY
1.0 Policy
Caltech including its division the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (“JPL”),
60
is committed to conducting activities in a manner that promotes
the safety and health of faculty, staff, postdoctoral scholars,
students, and visitors, applies sound practices in environmental
stewardship and minimizes risk to Caltech property. Activities at
Caltech are to be conducted in accordance with the following guid-
ing principles:
General Information
Institute policies are observed, remain current, and are
consistent with the anticipated changes in regulatory require-
ments.
2.2 Campus Environment, Health, and Safety Office
The Environment, Health, and Safety Office (“EHS”), which 61
reports to the Associate Vice President for Facilities, is
responsible for providing technical, regulatory, and relat-
ed-advisory services to the campus community. EHS works
in partnership with the academic divisions and administrative
departments to develop and implement safety programs
that provide technical guidance and training support rele-
vant to the operations of the laboratories and workplace,
are practical to carry out, and comply with the law. This
includes general orientation in prudent laboratory practices,
emergency response procedures, occupational safety, and
familiarity with Institute environmental, health and safety
policies and procedures. EHS also initiates site reviews to
assess potential hazards and determine effective controls,
and coordinates hazardous waste training and hazardous
waste disposal. EHS, working closely with the Office of the
General Counsel, reviews legislation, recommends policies,
provides regulatory agencies with required data and reports,
and investigates and reports environmental, health and safe-
ty incidents.
2.3 Campus Division Chairs and Department Heads
The Caltech campus consists of divisions conducting
research and educational activities, and administrative
departments supporting the operations of Caltech. It is the
responsibility of each division chair and department head
to ensure that their units conduct operations in accor-
dance with applicable laws and regulations and implement
Caltech’s environmental, health and safety policies and
procedures. Division chairs and department heads maintain
responsibility for day-to-day management and implementa-
tion of their environmental, health and safety programs.
Division chairs and department heads may designate
an individual with the authority to implement, manage, and
enforce environmental, health and safety compliance pro-
grams within the division or administrative office. With guid-
ance and assistance from EHS, the responsible individual
(i.e. the division chair, department head or their designee)
shall manage the environmental, health and safety activities
in the division or department.
2.4 JPL Office of Safety and Mission Success
The Office of Safety and Mission Success at JPL (“JPL
OSMS”) establishes and leads the Environmental, Health
and Safety and Mission Assurance Programs for projects,
programs and major tasks. JPL OSMS appropriately man-
ages risks and enhances the probability of mission safety
Institute Policies
and success. In this capacity, JPL OSMS is an independent
organization, reporting directly to the JPL Director. JPL
OSMS continually assesses risk and provides infrastructure
to ensure that JPL maintains compliance with the JPL Prime
62 Contract and applicable federal, state and local environ-
mental, health and safety requirements. JPL OSMS applies
knowledge, innovation and independence to achieve suc-
cessful missions that inspire the world while safeguarding
JPL’s people, assets and reputation.
2.5 JPL Environmental, Health and Safety Program
Management
The JPL Occupational Safety Program Office, the JPL
Systems Safety Program Office and the JPL Environmental
Affairs Program Office are chartered with establishing and
leading programs related to occupational safety, systems
safety and environmental compliance, respectively, and are
tasked with appropriately managing risks and enhancing the
probability of mission safety and success. These JPL pro-
gram offices, working closely with the Office of the General
Counsel, review legislation, recommend policies, provide
regulatory agencies with required data and reports, and
investigate and report environmental, health and safety inci-
dents. Each of the environmental, health and safety program
management offices has office-specific policies that are
detailed in JPL Rules!
2.6 Campus and JPL Manager and Supervisor Responsibilities
All managers and supervisors, both academic and adminis-
trative, at campus and JPL, are responsible for conducting
operations in accordance with all applicable laws and regula-
tions and Caltech policies, practices and programs.
Managers are responsible for ensuring that areas under
their management have adequate resources for environmen-
tal, health and safety programs, practices and equipment.
Managers are also responsible to ensure that those areas
under their management are in compliance with Caltech’s
environmental, health and safety policies, practices and pro-
grams.
Supervisors, including Principal Investigators (“PIs”), with
guidance and assistance from the environmental, health and
safety offices listed above, are responsible for implement-
ing environmental, health and safety policies, practices and
programs, ensuring that workplaces, including laboratories
and equipment, are safe and well-maintained, training and
informing employees, students, and visitors about work-
place-specific hazards and safety procedures, providing per-
sonal protective equipment, correcting violations, investigat-
ing incidents and complaints, overseeing proper storage and
disposal of hazardous materials, enforcing policies (including
appropriately disciplining employees and students who vio-
General Information
late environmental and safety requirements), and appropri-
ately documenting activities and processes.
Faculty bear full responsibility for the safety of work
undertaken in their laboratories but can designate an individ-
ual to implement and manage the day-today activities related 63
to environmental and safety practices within their research
group.
2.7 All faculty, staff and students
All faculty, staff, postdoctoral scholars and students at cam-
pus and JPL are responsible for:
• Keeping themselves informed of conditions affecting their
health and safety,
• Participating in safety training programs as required by the
governing organization’s policy and their supervisors,
• Performing work in a safe and prudent manner,
• Adhering to health and safety practices in their workplaces,
classrooms, and laboratories, and
• Advising of or reporting potentially unsafe practices, illegal
activities or serious hazards in the workplace, classroom or
laboratory, and cooperatively participating in the investiga-
tion and/or remediation of any incidents.
3.0 Reporting
In matters of actual or potential regulatory enforcement action,
investigations, or employee complaints, the appropriate environ-
mental, health and safety office will work closely with the Office of
the General Counsel to coordinate Caltech’s response to external
regulatory agencies concerned with workplace health, safety, and
environmental compliance.
Institute Policies
Any questions or concerns regarding compliance should be
brought to the attention of the appropriate manager or supervi-
sor or to the appropriate environmental, health and safety office.
Alternatively, concerns can be raised with the appropriate division
64 chair or vice president at campus, or the OSMS Director at JPL. In
addition, concerns can be raised anonymously for campus through
the anonymous hotline (626) 395-8787 or (888) 395-8787 or online
at Caltech Hotline or, for JPL, through the anonymous hotline (818)
393-6483, or the NASA Safety Reporting System.
4.0 Sanctions
Caltech expects all faculty, staff, postdoctoral scholars and stu-
dents to be vigilant in complying with all environmental, health
and safety requirements and to properly conduct their activities at
Caltech.
Local, state and federal laws and regulations establish civil and
criminal penalties for violations of environmental, health and safe-
ty laws and regulations, including substantial fines and possible
imprisonment.
Caltech views compliance with all laws, regulations, and Institute
guidelines as conditions of employment, and violation of such
requirements shall be considered grounds for disciplinary action up
to and including termination of employment or involuntary leave/
expulsion from Caltech.
GENDER-BASED MISCONDUCT
1.0 Policy
All members of the Caltech community have the right to be treat-
ed, and the responsibility to treat others, with dignity and respect.
These principles are fundamental to the educational and intellectual
mission of Caltech. It is the policy of Caltech to provide a work and
academic environment free of unlawful discrimination, harassment
and sexual misconduct. Caltech will not tolerate such conduct and
is committed to educating the community in ways to prevent its
occurrence.
This policy prohibits all forms of sexual or gender-based dis-
crimination, harassment and sexual misconduct (Gender-based
Misconduct), including sexual assault, non-consensual sexual
contact, relationship violence, sexual exploitation, and stalking
(Prohibited Conduct). Caltech also prohibits retaliation against an
individual who reports, submits a complaint, or who otherwise par-
ticipates in good faith in any matter related to this policy.
Caltech will take prompt and equitable action upon receiving
a report of Prohibited Conduct to determine what occurred and
will take reasonable steps to stop and remedy the effects of any
such conduct and prevent its recurrence. Caltech provides all
parties with appropriate due process and will reach reasonable
General Information
conclusions based on the evidence collected. Caltech will take
appropriate action, including disciplinary measures, when warrant-
ed, up to and including termination of employment or changes to
student enrollment status, including permanent separation from the
Institute. 65
2.0 Scope
This policy applies to all current students, faculty, superviso-
ry and nonsupervisory staff, postdoctoral scholars, volunteers,
interns, vendors, independent contractors, persons performing
services under contract with the Institute, visitors, and any other
individuals regularly or temporarily employed, studying, living, visit-
ing, or otherwise participating in Caltech’s educational programs or
activities.
This policy applies to Prohibited Conduct occurring on Institute-
controlled property, at Institute-sponsored events, in-Institute
programs or activities, by Institute affiliated organizations and
off-campus where the conduct has continuing adverse effects on
any member of the Caltech community in any Caltech program or
activity.
Members of the Caltech community are encouraged to promptly
report Prohibited Conduct to Caltech or consult with a confidential
resource, regardless of where the incident occurred, or who com-
mitted it. An individual who has experienced sexual misconduct is
encouraged to immediately seek assistance from a medical pro-
vider and report the incident to local law enforcement. Reports to
Caltech and law enforcement may be pursued simultaneously.
Even if Caltech does not have jurisdiction over the person
accused of Prohibited Conduct, Caltech will still take prompt action
to provide for the safety and well-being of the individual reporting
and the campus community, including taking reasonable steps to
stop and remedy the effects of the Prohibited Conduct and to pre-
vent recurrence of the behavior.
When used in this policy and accompanying procedures, com-
plainant refers to the individual who reportedly is the subject of the
Prohibited Conduct and respondent refers to the individual who is
reported to have engaged in the Prohibited Conduct.
In the event an act of discrimination is not simply about an
individual, but has broader implications, including affiliation with a
student organization, this policy will also apply. No student organi-
zation or residential facility may discriminate against anyone in the
Caltech community based on a protected characteristic.
Institute Policies
sexual or gender-based discrimination, sexual or gender-based
harassment, and sexual misconduct, including sexual assault,
non-consensual sexual contact, relationship violence, sexual
exploitation and stalking (Prohibited Conduct). Reported behavior
66 that does not constitute Prohibited Conduct under this policy, but
is nevertheless determined to be inappropriate pursuant to another
applicable Caltech policy, may subject a responding party to disci-
plinary action.
All individuals are protected against Prohibited Conduct regard-
less of gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender
expression. Prohibited Conduct can be committed by individuals
of any gender, regardless of an individual’s gender identity, gender
expression, or sexual orientation, and can occur between individu-
als of the same gender or different genders, strangers or acquain-
tances, as well as people involved in intimate or sexual relation-
ships. Organizations affiliated with the Institute or that use Caltech
property or resources in connection with their activities also are
prohibited from engaging in Prohibited Conduct.
Attempts or threats to commit Prohibited Conduct are equally
covered by this policy.
General Information
3.2.2 Gender-Based Harassment is harassment based on an
individual’s actual or perceived sex, gender, gender identity
or gender expression including harassing or bullying conduct
based on the individual’s gender expression, gender identity,
transgender status, gender transition, or nonconformity with 67
sex stereotypes.
A single isolated incident may create a hostile envi-
ronment if the incident is sufficiently severe, particularly if
the conduct is physical. For example, a single incident of
unwanted physical conduct of a sexual nature, like grabbing
an intimate body part, may be sufficiently severe to consti-
tute a hostile environment. Behavior of a harassing nature
that does not rise to the level of unlawful harassment but is
nevertheless determined to be inappropriate may subject the
offender to disciplinary action.
The following are examples of conduct that, depending
on the nature, frequency and severity, may constitute sexual
or gender-based harassment:
• Sending unwanted sexually-oriented jokes to a student or
work group email list.
• Displaying explicit sexual pictures in common areas of
Institute housing or on a work computer station where oth-
ers can view it.
• Making or using derogatory comments, epithets, slurs, or
jokes of a gender-based or sexual nature.
• Ostracizing individuals from group activities because of their
sex, gender or gender identity, gender expression, sexual
orientation or because they objected to harassing behavior.
• Making unwelcome graphic comments about an individual’s
body, using sexually degrading words to describe an indi-
vidual.
• Engaging in unwanted suggestive or obscene communica-
tions.
• Engaging in unwelcome touching, fondling or groping of a
sexual nature.
• Making unwanted sexual advances.
• Promising a benefit to someone in exchange for engaging in
sexual activity.
• Exposing one’s genitals to another without consent.
Institute Policies
individuals. Sexual or romantic relationships between an
undergraduate student and a faculty, postdoctoral scholar or
staff member are not permitted.
Upon learning about a relationship that violates this pol-
68 icy, the supervisor, dean, or division chair has the authority
and responsibility to review and remedy any direct adminis-
trative or academic relationship between the involved indi-
viduals.
When a consensual personal relationship arises and a
power differential exists, consent may not be considered a
defense to a claim of sexual harassment. The individual in
the relationship with greater power will be held responsible.
4.0 Definitions
General Information
The following are examples of conduct that could consti-
tute sexual exploitation:
• Unauthorized sharing or posting sexually explicit photos of
another, including a current or former partner.
• Surreptitiously taking pictures or videos of individuals, espe- 69
cially of private or intimate areas of their body.
• Observing, recording, viewing, distributing or allowing anoth-
er to observe, record, view or distribute, intimate or sexual
images of another individual without that individual’s con-
sent.
• Surveillance and other types of observations, whether by
physical proximity or electronic means.
Institute Policies
A person who is incapacitated is not capable of giving
effective consent to sexual activity. An incapacitated person
lacks the physical and mental capacity to make informed,
reasonable judgments about whether or not to engage in
70 sexual activity. A person who is incapacitated may not be
able to understand where they are, whom they are with, how
they got there, or what is happening.
A person may be incapacitated by a temporary or perma-
nent mental or physical condition, sleep, unconsciousness,
or be incapacitated as a result of consumption of alcohol or
drugs. Incapacitation is a state beyond mere intoxication or
“drunkenness.” Just because someone is under the influence
of alcohol or drugs does not necessarily mean that a person
is incapacitated. Impairment must be significant enough to
render a person unable to understand the fact, nature, or
extent of the sexual activity. In evaluating affirmative consent
in cases involving incapacitation, Caltech considers the state
of incapacitation of the reporting party and the knowledge of
the respondent.
Intoxication, even to the point of incapacitation, does not
relieve an individual from responsibility for a policy violation
when they engage in sexual conduct without the affirmative
consent of the other party or parties.
General Information
communicates to or about a person or interferes with the
person’s property. Reasonable person means a reasonable
person under similar circumstances and with similar identi-
ties to the victim. Stalking that is not sex or gender-based
is covered by the Violence Prevention policy and should be 71
reported to Security at campus or the Protective Services
Division at JPL and will be handled pursuant to that policy.
The following are examples of conduct that depending on
the frequency and severity may constitute stalking:
• Repeated unwanted communication, including face-to-face
contact, telephone calls, voice messages, emails, text mes-
sages, postings on social networking sites, written letters, or
gifts;
• Posting picture(s) or information of a sexual nature on social
networking sites or other websites;
• Gathering information about the person through the use of
public records, online searches, going through the garbage,
or contacting the person’s family, friends, or co-workers;
• Posting private pictures or videos on school bulletin boards
or internet sites;
• Installing spyware on another person’s personal devices,
including phones or computers;
• Surveillance or other types of observation, including staring
or peeping;
• Pursuing, following or showing up uninvited at or near places
like classrooms, residence, workplace or other places fre-
quented by an individual;
• Directly or indirectly making threats to the person.
5.0 Retaliation
Retaliation against any member of the Caltech community for mak-
ing a good-faith report of sexual violence, or for participating in an
investigation, proceeding, or hearing conducted by Caltech or a
state or federal agency, is strictly prohibited. Overt or covert acts
of retaliation, reprisal, interference, discrimination, intimidation, or
harassment against an individual or group for exercising their rights
under Title IX or other federal and state laws violates this policy
and is unlawful. Caltech will take steps to prevent retaliation and
will take prompt and appropriate corrective action to stop, and
remedy its effects, if retaliation occurs. Individuals who violate this
policy may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including ter-
mination of employment or permanent separation from Caltech.
6.0 Privacy
Caltech will maintain the privacy of all individuals involved in a
report of Prohibited Conduct to the extent possible. All Caltech
employees who are involved in the Institute’s response, including
the Title IX Coordinator, Deputy Coordinators, and investigators,
Institute Policies
receive specific instruction about respecting and safeguarding pri-
vate information. Throughout the process, every effort is made to
protect the privacy interests of all individuals involved, in a manner
consistent with the need for a thorough review of the matter.
72 Privacy generally means that information related to a report of
Prohibited Conduct will only be shared with those individuals who
have a “need to know.” These individuals will be discreet and will
respect the privacy of all individuals involved.
8.0 Resources
Caltech also encourages individuals who have experienced sexual
misconduct to seek immediate psychological support and advoca-
cy services provided by Caltech or community services. Campus
Security and the Protective Services Division at JPL will contact
on-campus and on-lab resources, provide information regarding
off-campus resources for support and advocacy, medical treat-
ment, and forensic evidence collection, and will arrange for trans-
portation to access off-campus resources.
General Information
JPL Protective Services Division (reporting and/or to
reach confidential or other resources)
(818) 393-3333
(818) 354-3333
The JPL Protective Services Division can assist with safety 73
situations, contact law enforcement, arrange for transporta-
tion to access off-campus resources, and contact the caller’s
choice of a confidential or other resource. The caller must
simply provide a phone number where the confidential or
other resource can reach the caller. Names and other infor-
mation regarding the incident need not be provided to the
Protective Services Division.
For Students:
(626) 395-8331 Student Wellness Services
after hours, press #2 to be connected
to on-call service
For faculty, campus staff, and postdoctoral scholars:
(626) 395-8360 Staff and Faculty Consultation Center
(626) 395-5000 after hours via Security
Institute Policies
8.1.2 Caltech Center for Diversity
Designated confidential resources (identified below) in the
Caltech Center for Diversity can generally talk to a com-
plainant or respondent without revealing to Caltech any per-
74 sonally-identifying information about an incident. Designation
as a confidential resource exempts the resource from
reporting information received about Prohibited Conduct
to the Title IX Coordinator, but does not exempt them from
other legally mandated disclosure obligations, such as under
child abuse reporting laws. the CLERY Act and in legal pro-
ceedings. For example, when a Clery report is required, a
Confidential Resource in the Caltech Center for Diversity
will keep the identify of the individual(s) confidential, but will
report the nature, date, time and general location of an inci-
dent to Security for purposes of Clery reporting. This infor-
mation will be included in aggregate statistics (with no iden-
tifying information) for inclusion in Caltech’s Annual Security
Report, if required.
General Information
tion, compassion, accompaniment, referral and advocacy
services.)
892 N. Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite D
Pasadena, CA 91103
(626) 584-6191 75
(626) 793-3385 (24 hours)
San Gabriel Valley Medical Center (24-hour medical care, emo-
tional support and comprehensive exams including forensic
evidence collection (the “rape kit”). The Sexual Assault
Response Team (SART) Hotline provides immediate connec-
tion to on-call nurse for sexual assault services.”).
438 West Las Tunas Drive
San Gabriel, CA 91776
(626) 289-5454
Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) Hotline:
(877) 209-3049 (24 hours)
Planned Parenthood
(Health clinic for emergency contraception and disease
prevention , pregnancy resources, birth control and family
planning).
1045 N. Lake Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91104
(626) 798-0706
Institute Policies
9.1 Title IX Coordinator and Deputy Coordinators
The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for coordinating
Caltech’s compliance with Title IX and for Caltech’s over-
all response to conduct falling under Title IX. The Title IX
76 Coordinator oversees all Title IX complaints, monitors out-
comes, identifies and addresses any patterns of systemic
problems that arise, and assesses effects on the campus
climate. The Title IX Coordinator also oversees the imple-
mentation and application of Caltech’s Title IX related pol-
icies within the scope of Title IX and coordinates Caltech’s
response to all complaints of sexual violence under Title
IX to ensure consistent treatment of parties involved, and
prompt and equitable resolution of complaints.
The Title IX Coordinator is supported by a Lead
Investigator and four Deputy Coordinators, all of whom can
answer questions regarding Title IX.
Title IX Coordinator
Hima Vatti, Assistant Vice President for Equity and Equity
Investigations
Phone: (626) 395-3132
E-mail: titleix@caltech.edu
Office: 205 Center for Student Services
Lead Investigator
Brian Quillen
Phone: (626) 395-4424
E-mail: bquillen@caltech.edu
Office: 348 Center for Student Services
General Information
Deputy Title IX Coordinator for JPL
Jackie Clennan-Price
Phone: (818) 393-0016
E-mail: Jackie.A.Clennanprice@jpl.nasa.gov
Office: Human Resources T1720-149 77
Institute Policies
JPL Ethics Hotline (818) 354-9999
JPL Protective Services Division’s
Workplace Violence Hotline (818) 393-2851
For either Campus or JPL by submitting a compliance Hotline
78 Contact Form
General Information
conduct consistent with the complainant’s request not to use their
name or their request not to pursue an investigation or that no
disciplinary action be taken, while also protecting the health and
safety of the complainant and the Institute community.
Caltech’s ability to fully investigate and respond may be limited 79
if the complainant requests anonymity or declines to participate in
an investigation. Caltech will, however, take other action to limit the
effects of the Prohibited Conduct and prevent its recurrence.
In those instances where the Title IX Coordinator or designee
determines that Caltech must proceed with an investigation despite
the request of the complainant, the Title IX Coordinator or desig-
nee will inform the complainant of Caltech’s intention to initiate an
investigation. The complainant is not required to participate in the
investigation.
In all cases, the final decision on whether, how, and to what
extent Caltech will conduct an investigation, and whether other
measures will be taken in connection with the report of Prohibited
Conduct, rests solely with the Title IX Coordinator or their designee.
Institute Policies
Warning procedures. Emergency Notifications and Timely Warnings
do not disclose the name of the victim.
14.0 Clery Reporting
80
The Clery Act requires Caltech to issue an Annual Security and Fire
Safety Report, which includes crime statistics for sexual assault
(rape, fondling, incest and statutory rape), domestic violence, dat-
ing violence and stalking. Campus Security gathers these crime
statistics from security reports, Pasadena Police Department
information, JPL and reports by Campus Security Authorities.
Crime statistics do not disclose any identifying information about a
complainant, respondent, witnesses or others. For more informa-
tion and statistics for the past three years, see the current Annual
Security and Fire Safety Report.
General Information
Consultation Center, and Employee & Organizational Development
at campus, and the Deputy Title IX Coordinator, EEO Coordinator,
and Human Resources Business Partners at JPL. The Policies are
published in the Caltech Catalog and on the following Caltech and
JPL websites: Caltech Human Resources, JPL Human Resources, 81
Title IX, and Student Affairs.
Reporting to Caltech
A member of the Caltech community who wishes to report
Prohibited Conduct should do so as soon as possible after the
incident, although reports (hereinafter “complaints”) may be
Institute Policies
made at any time. Complaints can be made orally or in writing.
Complaints should be brought to the attention of the Title IX
Coordinator (hereinafter “Title IX Coordinator or designee”), Lead
Investigator, or a Deputy Title IX Coordinator, or other responsi-
82 ble employee listed in the policy, who will then notify the Title IX
Coordinator in cases falling under Title IX.
Title IX Coordinator
Hima Vatti
Phone: (626) 395-3132
E-mail: titleix@caltech.edu
Office: 205 Center for Student Services
Initial Title IX Assessment
General Information
or the campus by not proceeding, the nature and seriousness of
the allegations, whether there have been other reports/complaints
of Prohibited Conduct involving the respondent, and whether the
allegations are contested. The Title IX Coordinator will obtain the
complainant’s agreement to proceed with the proposed approach 83
to resolution unless there is a serious or continuing threat to
the Caltech community. In implementing the approach, the Title
IX Coordinator will inform and coordinate with the appropriate
responsible administrator(s): Provost, Assistant Vice President
for Human Resources, Deans, Associate Deans, Associate Vice
President for Human Resources on campus, or Director for Human
Resources at JPL.
Caltech will investigate reports of Prohibited Conduct consistent
with its obligations under applicable law. The Title IX Coordinator
will seek consent from the complainant to proceed with action. If
the complainant does not consent, Caltech will still take all rea-
sonable steps to protect the complainant, including instituting
appropriate interim measures. If the Complainant refuses to have
their name disclosed to the respondent, the Title IX Coordinator
will explain that Caltech’s ability to investigate and respond may be
limited. If the complaint includes allegations that may constitute a
possible crime, the Title IX Coordinator will notify the complainant
of their right to file a criminal complaint or to choose not to notify
law enforcement. If a complainant requests that the complaint not
be pursued, the request will be considered consistent with the pro-
visions of Section 9.0 of the policy.
In cases of alleged Prohibited Conduct at JPL not falling under
Title IX, the above described initial assessment will be done by the
JPL Deputy Title IX Coordinator or their designee.
Interim Measures
Interim measures are actions taken by Caltech in response to a
report of Prohibited Conduct. Upon receipt of a report, Caltech will
take prompt measures to protect the rights of the parties as appro-
priate. Caltech will immediately assess whether there is a threat
to the complainant, the respondent and/or other members of the
community and will take steps necessary to address such
risks. These steps may include interim safety measures, which may
be made at any time, to provide for the safety of individuals and
the campus community.
Appropriate administrative changes and/or academic changes
may be made, if requested and reasonably available, at any stage
in the process to protect the rights of either party. They will be
made by the Title IX Coordinator in coordination with responsible
administrators. For students, these changes might include changes
to housing arrangements, counseling services, academic accom-
modations, “no contact” orders between individuals, restrictions on
access to Caltech or to specific Caltech areas or activities, persona
Institute Policies
non grata status, escorts, limitations on extracurricular or house
activities, changes to classes and/or housing, Caltech-imposed
leave for the respondent, as well as any other remedy that can be
tailored to the involved individuals to achieve the goals of this policy.
84 Changes affecting faculty, postdoctoral scholars and staff,
including employees at JPL, might include transfer of supervisory
or evaluative responsibility regarding grading, supervision, ten-
ure review, letters of recommendation, and/or changes to office
assignments.
When taking steps to separate a complainant and respondent,
Caltech will endeavor to minimize the burden on the complainant.
Care will be taken to protect both parties with the greatest degree
of privacy possible. If a complainant wishes to seek a temporary
restraining order or similar judicial order, Caltech will help the com-
plainant with that process.
The imposition of interim measures is not indicative of a deter-
mination of responsibility or any other outcome. These measures
may be modified at any time and may be kept in place after a final
investigative decision is reached.
All parties are expected to comply with any interim measures
that may be imposed. Failure to comply with interim measures
may be grounds for disciplinary action. A party may be found in
violation of the policy for failure to comply with an interim measure
even if they are found not responsible for the underlying report of
Prohibited Conduct.
Informal Options
Individuals who believe they have been subjected to Prohibited
Conduct may choose to resolve their concerns informally. In gen-
eral, the goal of the informal options is to quickly end offending
behavior without utilizing disciplinary action. Individuals with an
official status at Caltech, such as faculty, managers, or supervisors,
are expected to follow up with the complainant to make sure that
the issue has indeed been resolved. Mutually agreeable administra-
tive changes are sometimes possible to ease an uncomfortable sit-
uation. Individuals are not required to try to resolve their concerns
informally before making a formal complaint. Complainants should
consider at the outset whether such changes might be desirable.
Informal options include:
General Information
side Caltech.
• Resolving the complaint informally with the help of a third
party who has a faculty, supervisory, or managerial position at
Caltech. The goal here is also to allow the parties to resolve
complaints without an investigation and without elevating the 85
complaint within Caltech. However, a person in one of these
official positions is obligated to follow up with the Title IX
• Coordinator and complainant to be sure the situation has been
resolved. This action might include referring the complaint
to an appropriate individual within Caltech or sharing some
of this information with other persons holding positions of
responsibility at Caltech.
Formal Options
A complainant alleging Prohibited Conduct may elect to pursue a
formal option. Formal options include:
Administrative Resolution
In cases alleging Prohibited Conduct covered by Title IX, the
Title IX Coordinator or designee, with the complainant’s and the
respondent’s agreement, may offer the opportunity to resolve the
complaint by Administrative Resolution. Administrative Resolution
provides an opportunity for the respondent to accept responsibility
for their alleged conduct and proceed to a resolution without a
formal investigation. Complainants and respondents participating
in this process may have an advisor of their choice accompany
them when reporting, or responding to, allegations of Prohibited
Conduct. The advisor may not speak on behalf of the individual
they are accompanying.
If the Administrative Resolution option is agreed to by a com-
plainant, the Title IX Coordinator will meet with the respondent
to review the allegations. The Title IX Coordinator will provide the
respondent with information on the respondent’s rights and options
under the policy and these procedures, and written materials about
the availability of, and contact information for, campus resources
and services. The Title IX Coordinator will offer the respondent the
opportunity to resolve the complaint by Administrative Resolution
by accepting responsibility for the alleged conduct. If the respon-
dent elects to acknowledge that the alleged conduct occurred and
takes responsibility for the alleged conduct, the respondent will
sign a written acknowledgement and the matter will be referred
to the appropriate decision maker (hereinafter “decision maker
or designee”) for a decision concerning sanctions and any other
remedial action that may be appropriate. The complainant and
respondent will both be notified simultaneously in writing of the
resolution, including any sanctions against the respondent. Either
party may only appeal the sanction imposed.
In cases of alleged Prohibited Conduct at JPL not falling under
Institute Policies
Title IX, the above described Administrative Resolution process will
be administered by the JPL Equal Employment Opportunity Officer
or their designee.
If the respondent contests responsibility for the alleged conduct,
86 the Administrative Resolution process will be concluded and the
case will be referred for formal investigation or other resolution as
appropriate.
Remedy-Based Resolution
In appropriate cases at any time during the process, the Title IX
Coordinator or the decision maker may propose a Remedy-Based
Resolution (RBR) as a means of resolving a complaint of Prohibited
Conduct. The intent of a RBR is to address the underlying issues
that contributed to the subject incident by imposing non-disci-
plinary remedies focused on education around issues of concern,
remediation of problematic and unhealthy behaviors and the use
of other strategies to remedy the situation. Both parties must vol-
untarily agree to all the terms of the RBR as the complete and final
resolution of the Title IX complaint(s).
Mediation
In appropriate cases as determined by the Title IX Coordinator,
mediation may be offered to the parties. Mediation is a process
whereby a facilitator (mediator) works with the complainant and
respondent to attempt to reach a mutually agreeable resolution of
a complaint of Prohibited Conduct. Both parties must voluntarily
agree to all the terms of a mediated resolution as the complete and
final resolution of the Title IX complaint(s).
General Information
pose of the investigation is to determine the facts relating to the
complaint and decisions are based on the evidence. Evidence may
include parties and witness testimony and any documents relating
to the complaint. Caltech’s policy and procedures are intended
to ensure that individuals reported for Prohibited Conduct are not 87
prejudged and are provided with adequate notice and an oppor-
tunity to be heard regarding the allegations made against them.
Consistent with federal and state law, the investigators will not
ask questions or seek evidence of the complainant’s prior sexual
conduct with anyone other than the respondent. Furthermore, evi-
dence of a prior consensual sexual, romantic, or intimate relation-
ship between the complainant and respondent itself does not by
itself imply consent or preclude a finding of Prohibited Conduct.
The investigation will be treated as private to the extent pos-
sible. Caltech administrators will be informed on a need-to-know
basis. Caltech will make reasonable and appropriate efforts to
preserve the complainant’s and respondent’s privacy and protect
the confidentiality of information. Investigatory meetings will not be
recorded by any participant involved in a case. Investigation files
will be maintained by the Title IX Office.
Caltech does not tolerate retaliation and will take steps to pre-
vent retaliation and strong responsive action if it occurs. All partic-
ipants, including the complainant and respondent, are protected
against retaliation and will be advised to notify Caltech immediately
if retaliation occurs.
Investigation Process
• The formal investigation process begins when the complainant
files a formal complaint. Within a reasonable length of time
after the complaint has been filed, the Title IX Coordinator will
notify both parties when the Title IX Office is starting an inves-
tigation. That notification will summarize the allegations and
underlying reported behavior, as well as identify the assigned
investigator(s). The complainant and respondent also will be
provided with a copy of the Gender-Based Misconduct policy
and accompanying procedures.
• Either party may object to an investigator(s) if they believe that
investigator has a conflict or cannot be impartial. The Title IX
Coordinator will consider any objections and notify the parties
of the decision related to the investigator(s).
• After a reasonable amount of time to review the notice of
investigation and applicable policies, the parties will be given
equal opportunity to meet with the investigator(s). In those
meetings, the investigator(s) will gather evidence about the
allegations, including any documents or written statements
submitted by either party.
• The complainant and respondent may have an advisor of their
Institute Policies
choice accompany them in the investigatory process or other
meetings with the party related to the complainant. The advi-
sor may not speak on behalf of the individual they are accom-
panying.
88 • Throughout the process, the parties may suggest witnesses
and documents to the investigator(s), as well as questions for
the investigator(s) to ask the other party and any witnesses.
The investigator(s) will determine whether the suggestions are
relevant and appropriate. Caltech asks the parties to keep the
investigation private, but cannot prohibit the parties from dis-
cussing the investigation with others in connection with identi-
fying evidence for the investigator(s) to gather.
• The investigator(s) will interview relevant witnesses and gather
other evidence related to the allegations. Witnesses may also
submit documents or written statements to the investigator(s).
• In complaints covered by Title IX, the investigators will investi-
gate any allegations that alcohol or drugs were involved in the
incident.
• The complainant and respondent will be given equal opportu-
nity to review and respond to all the evidence gathered by the
investigator(s).
• The investigator(s) will prepare a draft report which includes
their recommended findings of fact and related analysis
regarding the allegations. The complainant and respondent will
have the opportunity to review and respond to the draft report.
If any information is presented by either party that impacts
the investigators’ analysis or findings it will be shared with the
other party and they will be given an opportunity to respond.
• Once the report is finalized, it will be provided to the com-
plainant, respondent, and decision maker.
• For cases in which a respondent faces severe disciplinary sanc-
tions (e.g. involuntary temporary or permanent separation from
the Institute) and the credibility of the parties or witnesses is cen-
tral to the adjudication of the allegations, the decision maker and
the lead investigator will meet with the parties, and others with
whom the decision maker deems appropriate prior to making a
decision regarding the case. The parties may suggest questions
to ask the other party and any witnesses with whom the decision
maker is meeting. The lead investigator will facilitate the ques-
tioning and will have the discretion to exclude any question(s)
that they determine is inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate.
To facilitate access while maintaining the physical separation of
the parties, the party submitting the questions will have access to
the live exchange(s) via telephone conference or other appropri-
ate technology, and may submit follow-up questions via email or
other appropriate technology during this process.
General Information
• The decision maker will make a decision regarding the allega-
tions based on the report, the parties’ responses to the report,
the information gathered in the decision maker’s meetings with
the parties and others, and the decision maker’s assessment
of credibility in cases where the credibility of any party or 89
witness is relevant. When credibility is at issue, the decision
maker will not rely on statements made by a party or witness if
that person declines to meet with the decision maker.
• The decision maker, consulting with the Title IX Coordinator as
appropriate, will determine the appropriate sanction or reme-
dy.
• The complainant and respondent will be notified in writing with
a closing investigation letter of the outcome of the process,
including any sanctions or remedies. This notice will also
include the option to appeal.
• Complaints will be investigated and resolved within a reason-
ably prompt time frame after the complaint has been made,
generally within 60 days (not including any appeal). This time
frame may be extended depending on factors, including but
not limited to, the complexity of the case. Both parties will be
kept informed of the status of the investigation.
• The Title IX Coordinator will be informed of the outcome of the
investigation and any appeal in order to carry out their respon-
sibilities to consult on sanctions, monitor outcomes, identify
and address any patterns, and assess effects on the campus
climate.
• Exceptions to or modification of these procedures can be
made by the Title IX Coordinator or designee, Provost, Dean
or Associate Deans, Associate Vice President for Human
Resources, or Director for Human Resources at JPL.
Standard of Evidence
The investigator(s) and the decision maker will use the preponderance
of evidence standard in determining whether Prohibited Conduct
occurred. A preponderance of the evidence means that it is more
Institute Policies
likely than not that the incident occurred. When the investigator(s)/
decision maker is presented with two different but plausible versions
of the incident, credibility determinations may affect the outcome.
90 Recommended Findings
The investigator(s) will report their recommended findings of fact
regarding the charges to the appropriate decision maker. The
decision maker shall be determined based upon the respondent’s
affiliation (the Provost for faculty, the relevant Dean for students,
the Assistant Vice President for Human Resources for postdoctor-
al scholars and campus staff, or the Deputy Director for Human
Resources at JPL for JPL employees) or their designees.
Resolution
Once the decision maker has received the report and conducted
the meetings with the parties and others they deem necessary
to making a decision, the decision maker will reach conclusions
regarding the allegations and if warranted will impose any sanc-
tions they deem to be appropriate.
The conclusions that might be reached may include, but are not
limited to, the following possibilities:
• Verbal warning
• Training
• Mandatory counseling/coaching
• A formal written warning placed in the respondent’s file
• Exclusion from participation in certain activities for specified
period of time
General Information
• Banned from campus
• Suspension of the right to accept new graduate students or
postdoctoral scholars
• Transfer of advisees 91
• Removal from positions of administrative responsibility
• Removal from housing
• Removal from a supervisory position
• Involuntary leave of absence/suspension
• Expulsion
• Termination of employment
• Permanent separation from the Institute
• Revocation of admission
• Other sanctions instead of, or in addition to, those specified
above
• Multiple sanctions may be imposed
Appeals
Appeals must be in writing and submitted within ten (10) calendar
days of notification of the decision to the appropriate administrator
identified below. Appeals of decisions resulting from the Formal
Complaint process are limited to one or more of the following
grounds: a procedural error or due process violation occurred
which would have significantly affected the outcome of the com-
plaint; there is new evidence (including a new witness) that was
not available during the process which would have significantly
affected the conclusions of the decision maker; or the sanction is
substantially disproportionate to the findings. Appeals of decisions
resulting from the Administrative Resolution process can be made
only on the ground that the sanction is substantially disproportion-
ate to the acknowledged conduct.
If a party submits an appeal, the other party will have the oppor-
Institute Policies
tunity to submit a written response to the appeal within ten (10)
calendar days of the filing of the appeal. The complainant and the
respondent simultaneously will be informed, in writing, of the out-
come of the appeal. Appeal decisions are final.
92 Decisions of the Provost may be appealed to the Office of the
Provost or designee. Decisions of the Dean of Undergraduate
Students or Dean of Graduate Studies may be appealed to the Vice
President for Student Affairs or designee. Decisions of the Assistant
Vice President for Human Resources may be appealed to the
Associate Vice President of Human Resources or designee. Decisions
of the Deputy Director for Human Resources at JPL may be appealed
to the Director for Human Resources at JPL or designee.
Further Complaints
If the corrective action does not end the Prohibited Conduct, the
complainant should immediately notify the Title IX Coordinator,
Lead Investigator, or a Deputy Title IX Coordinator, the Provost or
a Division Chair, Dean or Associate Dean, EOD Director; or at JPL,
the Section Manager, Talent Management. In such cases, the com-
plainant has the right to file another complaint.
General Information
on individuals based on protected characteristics. Harassment
on the basis of any legally protected characteristic is a form of
discrimination and is likewise prohibited by this policy. The law
prohibits discrimination by co-workers and third parties as well as
supervisors and managers. Interns, volunteers and persons per- 93
forming services under a contract with Caltech are also covered
by this policy. Caltech will take all reasonable steps to eliminate
discrimination, and harassment in its work and academic environ-
ment. Complaints concerning sexual and gender-based discrimina-
tion and harassment and sexual misconduct are governed by the
Gender-Based Misconduct Policy.
Caltech is an equal employment opportunity and affirmative
action employer and will, whenever possible, actively recruit and
include for employment members of underrepresented minority
groups, females, protected veterans or individuals with disabled
veteran status, and otherwise qualified persons with disabilities.
Caltech will hire, transfer, recruit, train and promote based on the
qualifications of the individual to ensure equal consideration and
fair treatment of all. All other employment actions, such as work
assignments, appointments, compensation, evaluations, training,
benefits, layoffs, and terminations are governed by this policy.
Personnel actions will be reviewed to ensure adherence to this
policy.
Caltech’s Associate Vice President for Human Resources and
JPL’s Director for Human Resources have been assigned to direct
the establishment of and to monitor the implementation of per-
sonnel procedures to guide our Affirmative Action programs. They
will have responsibility to review and update the Affirmative Action
plans annually, including responsibility for the audit and reporting
system. A notice explaining Caltech’s policies will remain posted.
The following individuals have been designated as Equal
Employment Opportunity Coordinators: the Provost is the coordi-
nator for faculty, the Assistant Vice President for Equity and Equity
Investigations is the coordinator for campus staff and volunteers,
the Associate Deans of Students are the coordinators for under-
graduate students and interns, the Dean of Graduate Studies is the
coordinator for graduate students and interns, and the Director for
Human Resources at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is the coordi-
nator for employees, interns and volunteers assigned there. The
Assistant Vice President for Equity and Equity Investigations has
been designated as Caltech’s Title IX Coordinator. The contact
number is (626) 395-3132, email: TitleIXCoordinator@caltech.edu,
or the office in Room 205, Center for Student Services. The Title
IX Coordinator is supported by three deputy coordinators. https://
titleix.caltech.edu/
Inquiries concerning the interpretation and application of this
policy should be referred to the appropriate designated individual.
Management is responsible for monitoring decisions regarding
personnel actions to ensure that these decisions are based solely
Institute Policies
on the individual’s merit, and on legitimate, nondiscriminatory job
requirements for the position in question and the reasonableness
of any necessary accommodations for persons with a disability.
Individuals who witness or experience conduct they believe
94 to be in violation of this policy are urged to contact any of the
above-mentioned coordinators, the individuals identified in
Caltech’s harassment policy, the Caltech Office of Equity and Title
IX or JPL Employee Relations Group immediately. In addition,
they may utilize Caltech’s anonymous hotline at 626-395-8787.
Complaints will be investigated promptly. Confidentiality will be
maintained to the extent possible. Supervisors and managers are
required to report any complaints of discriminatory conduct to one
of the above-designated coordinators so that Caltech can try to
resolve the complaint internally. Individuals who violate this policy
may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termina-
tion of employment or permanent separation from Caltech.
In addition, employees who believe they have been subject to
harassment or discrimination have the right to file a complaint
with the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or
the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which
have the authority to remedy violations. Employees, students and
others participating in Caltech’s educational programs and activ-
ities may file complaints with the U.S. Department of Education
Office for Civil Rights at (415) 486-5555 (or ocr.sanfrancisco@
ed.gov) or (800) 421-3481 (or OCR@ed.gov). Complaints may also
be directed to the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education at
http://bppe.ca.gov.
Caltech will conduct a fair, timely, and thorough investigation
into complaints within the scope of this Policy to determine what
occurred and take reasonable steps to remedy the effects of any
discrimination and prevent recurrence of the behavior. Caltech
provides all parties with appropriate due process and reaches
reasonable conclusions based on the evidence collected. Caltech
takes appropriate action, including disciplinary measures, when
warranted.
Employees and applicants shall not be subjected to harass-
ment, intimidation, threats, coercion, discrimination, or retaliation
because they have engaged in or may engage in any of the fol-
lowing activities: filing a complaint; assisting or participating in an
investigation, compliance review, hearing or any other activity relat-
ed to the administration of any federal, state, or local law requiring
equal opportunity; opposing any act or practice made unlawful by
any federal, state or local laws requiring equal opportunity; exer-
cising any state legal right protected by federal, state or local law
requiring equal opportunity.
To ensure equal employment opportunity and nondiscrimina-
tion, each member of the Caltech community must understand the
importance of this policy and his/her responsibilities to contribute
to its’ success. The President of Caltech fully supports Caltech’s
General Information
equal opportunity and affirmative action policies.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
1.0 Policy
Caltech is committed to providing a safe, healthy, and produc-
tive work and academic environment for all its faculty, staff,
postdoctoral scholars and students. Consistent with the Drug-
Free Workplace Act of 1988 and the Drug-Free Schools and
Communities Act Amendments of 1989, it is a Caltech policy to
maintain a work and academic environment free from drug and
alcohol abuse. Faculty, staff, postdoctoral scholars and students
are required to comply with this policy and the related guidelines
provided by the academic divisions and student organizations.
2.0 Scope
Institute Policies
in a safe, productive, or efficient manner, must advise their supervi-
sor. Caltech may require an employee to submit to drug and alco-
hol testing consistent with Institute policy and applicable federal
and state law. Testing procedures that apply to JPL employees are
96 available on the JPL Human Resources website.
General Information
tension, or anxiety when the substance is not used. In addition,
with many substances, use can lead to physical tolerance, char-
acterized by the need for increasing amounts of the substance to
achieve the same effect and/or physical dependence, character-
ized by the onset of unpleasant or painful physiological symptoms 97
when the substance is no longer being used. As tolerance and
psychological or physical dependence develop, judgment becomes
impaired and the individual often does not realize they are losing
control over the use of the substance and that they need help.
It is impossible to predict accurately how an individual will react
to a specific drug or to alcohol because effects vary depending
on the person, environmental variables, the dosage and potency
of the substance, the method of taking the substance, the chro-
nicity of use, and whether the substance is taken in conjunction
with other substances. Illegal drugs have particularly unpredictable
effects due to variability in dosage and purity. Further, the overall
potency of street drugs has increased dramatically over the past
two decades, making users increasingly susceptible to negative
effects.
Alcohol acts as a depressant to the central nervous system
and can cause serious short- and long-term damage. Short-term
effects include nausea, vomiting, and ulcers; more chronic abuse
can lead to brain, liver, kidney, and heart damage, and even to
eventual death. Ingesting a large amount of alcohol at one time can
lead to alcohol poisoning, coma, and death. Drugs such as LSD,
amphetamines, marijuana, and alcohol alter emotion, cognition,
perception, physiology, and behavior in a variety of ways. Health
risks include but are not limited to depression, apathy, hallucina-
tions, paranoia, and impaired judgment, and all substances have
an adverse effect on pregnancy and the fetus. When two or more
substances are combined, the effect is often stronger than their
additive sum.
4.1 Examples
• Unlawful possession of a narcotic drug is punishable by
imprisonment in the state prison.
• The purchase, possession, or consumption of any alcoholic
beverages (including beer and wine) by any person under
the age of 21 is prohibited.
Institute Policies
• It is illegal to provide alcohol to a person under the age of
21.
• Serving alcohol to an intoxicated person is prohibited.
• Selling any alcoholic beverages, except under the authority
98 of a California Alcoholic Beverage Control License, is prohib-
ited.
• It is a felony to induce another person to take various drugs
and “intoxicating agents” with the intent of enabling oneself
or the drugged person to commit a felony. The person who
induced the other may be regarded as a principal in any
crime committed.
• Any person found in a public place to be under the influence
of an intoxicating liquor or drug and unable to care for their
own safety, or who is interfering with the use of a public way,
is guilty of disorderly conduct, which is a misdemeanor.
• It is illegal for a person to possess nitrous oxide (e.g. whip-
pets) with the intent to inhale it for purpose of altering their
mood or mental functioning.
General Information
6.0 Drug and Alcohol Awareness Program
Caltech has established and will maintain a drug and alcohol
awareness program to educate faculty, staff, postdoctoral scholars
and students about:
99
1. Caltech’s substance abuse policy;
2. the dangers of drugs and alcohol in a work and academic
environment; faculty, staff, postdoctoral scholar and student
assistance programs; and
3. disciplinary action that may be imposed on faculty, staff, post-
doctoral scholars and students for violations of this policy.
UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT
1.0 Policy
It is the policy of Caltech to provide a work and academic environ-
ment free of unlawful harassment (“harassment”). Harassment is
Institute Policies
a form of misconduct that includes unwelcome physical, verbal or
non-verbal conduct which results in a person feeling intimidated,
threatened, humiliated or demeaned, and is likely to interfere with
an individual’s work or education, or adversely affects an indi-
100 vidual’s living conditions. Harassment in any form, based on sex,
race, color, age, national origin, ethnicity, ancestry, physical or
mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, pregnan-
cy, marital status, religion, gender, gender expression or gender
identity, sexual orientation, military or veteran status, or any other
characteristic protected by state or federal laws (“protected char-
acteristics”), is unlawful and is strictly prohibited, as are all forms of
sexual intimidation, exploitation, and violence. Caltech is commit-
ted to educating the community in ways to prevent its occurrence.
Complaints concerning sexual and gender-based discrimination
and harassment and sexual misconduct are governed by the
Gender-Based Misconduct Policy.
Conduct becomes unlawful harassment when 1) enduring the
offensive conduct becomes a condition of continued employment,
or 2) the conduct is enough to create a work or academic environ-
ment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hos-
tile, or abusive. Anti-discrimination laws also prohibit harassment
against individuals in retaliation for filing a discrimination claim,
testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceed-
ing, or lawsuit under these laws; or opposing employment practic-
es that they reasonably believe discriminate against individuals, in
violation of these laws. Petty slights and annoyances will not rise to
the level of illegality.
Offensive conduct may include, but is not limited to, offensive
jokes, slurs, epithets or name calling, physical assaults or threats,
intimidation, ridicule or mockery, insults or put-downs, offensive
objects or pictures, and interference with work or academic perfor-
mance.
Caltech, as appropriate, will conduct a fair, timely, and thorough
investigation into complaints within the scope of this policy to
determine what occurred and take reasonable steps to remedy the
effects of any harassment and prevent recurrence of the behav-
ior. Caltech provides all parties with appropriate due process and
reaches reasonable conclusions based on the evidence collected.
Caltech takes appropriate action, including disciplinary measures,
when warranted. Caltech requires any employee, who is responsi-
ble for directing or supervising other Caltech employees or evaluat-
ing the work of students, to regularly participate in training regard-
ing harassment, and the prevention of abusive conduct, consistent
with federal and state legal requirements.
Behavior evidently intended to dishonor protected character-
istics such as race, gender expression or identity, national origin
or ethnic group, religious belief, sexual orientation, age, or dis-
ability is contrary to the pursuit of inquiry and education and may
be discriminatory harassment and violate the law. Some kinds of
General Information.
behavior that are clearly intended to harass, while inappropriate
and not tolerated at Caltech, may not be unlawful. These types of
behavior may be dealt with for students through the student dis-
ciplinary process and for employees through supervisory interven-
tion, including the disciplinary process. However, in order to make 101
an accurate judgment as to whether incidents are unlawful, the full
context in which the actions were taken or statements made must
be considered. Every complaint is considered based on the totality
of the circumstances. A single incident, if unusually severe, may
constitute harassment.
The following are examples of behaviors that may constitute
harassment:
2.0 Scope
This policy applies to all members of the Caltech community (stu-
dents, faculty, supervisory and nonsupervisory staff, postdoctoral
scholars, volunteers, interns, vendors, independent contractors,
persons performing services under contract with Caltech, visitors
and any other individuals regularly or temporarily employed, study-
ing, living, visiting, or otherwise participating in Caltech’s employ-
ment and education programs and activities). This policy applies
to conduct occurring on Institute controlled property, at Institute
sponsored events and in Institute employment and education pro-
grams and activities regardless of location.
Members of the Caltech community are encouraged to report
unlawful harassment regardless of where the incident occurred or
who committed it (i.e., a stranger or non-stranger). Even if Caltech
does not have jurisdiction over the person accused of harassment,
Caltech will still take prompt action and reasonable steps to reme-
dy the effects of the harassment and prevent any reoccurrence of
the behavior.
Institute Policies
making a good-faith report of harassment or for participating in an
investigation or proceeding conducted by Caltech, or by a state or
federal agency. Overt or covert acts of retaliation, reprisal, interfer-
ence, discrimination, intimidation or harassment against an individ-
102 ual or group for exercising their rights under federal and state laws
is unlawful. Caltech will take steps to prevent retaliation and will
take prompt and appropriate corrective action if retaliation occurs.
Individuals who violate this policy may be subject to disciplinary
action up to and including termination of employment or perma-
nent separation from Caltech.
4.0 Privacy
Caltech will maintain the privacy of all individuals involved in a
report of harassment to the extent possible. Privacy generally
means that information related to a report of harassment will only
be shared with those individuals who have a “need to know.”
These individuals will be discreet and will respect the privacy of all
individuals involved.
5.0 Confidentiality
Confidentiality generally means that information shared by an indi-
vidual with designated campus or community professionals cannot
be revealed to any other individual without the express permission
of the individual. These professionals are listed in Section 6.0. They
are prohibited from breaking confidentiality unless there is an immi-
nent threat of harm to self or others or as otherwise permitted by
law. When a report involves suspected abuse of a minor under the
age of 18, these confidential resources are required by state law to
notify child protective services and/or local law enforcement.
General Information
tal-health counseling services to the campus community. The JPL
Employee Assistance Program provides mental-health counseling
services to the JPL community. They will not report any informa-
tion about an incident to Caltech, including the Title IX Coordinator
unless requested by their client. They can be contacted 24 hours a 103
day/7 days a week at:
For students:
(626) 395-8331 Student Counseling Center
(626) 395-5000 after hours via Security
Campus Hotline:
(626) 395-8787 or (888) 395-8787
JPL Ethics Hotline:
(818) 354-9999
Institute Policies
8.0 Reporting to Caltech
Anyone who witnesses, experiences, or is otherwise aware of conduct
that they believe to be in violation of this policy, including retaliation,
is urged to contact Caltech immediately. To report a claim or request
104 any assistance and guidance contact the Equity and Title IX Office at
campus or the JPL Employee Relations Group.
Any person in a supervisory role must report any complaints of
unlawful harassment of which they become aware to one of the
designated EEO Coordinators listed in Section 7.0.
If a member of the Caltech community would like support
and guidance in filing a complaint, they may contact one of the
Deans or Associate Deans, the Assistant Vice President for Equity
and Equity Investigations in Human Resources, JPL’s Manager
of Employee Relations, or the JPL Section Manager of Talent
Management or Human Resources Business Partners at JPL. They
may also contact the EEO Coordinators.
Campus Hotline:
(626) 395-8787 or (888) 395-8787
JPL Ethics Hotline:
(818) 354-9999
JPL Protective Services Division’s Workplace Violence Hotline:
(818) 393-2851
For either Campus or JPL by submitting a compliance Hotline
Contact Form
General Information
11.0 Informational Resources
Information on unlawful harassment, as well as copies of Caltech’s
Nondiscrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity, Unlawful
Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct, and Violence Prevention pol-
icies are available from Caltech’s Title IX Coordinator and Deputy 105
Coordinators, Human Resources, Student Affairs and Deans offic-
es, the Caltech Center for Diversity, Resident Associates, the Staff
and Faculty Consultation Center, and Employee & Organizational
Development at campus, and Employee Relations and the Human
Resources Business Partners at JPL. The policies are published
in the Caltech Catalog and on the following Caltech websites:
Caltech Human Resources, JPL Human Resources, Title IX, and
Student Affairs.
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
1.0 Policy
It is the policy of Caltech to provide a safe and secure environment
for all members of the Caltech community and to prohibit all forms
of violence on its premises or in any of its programs or activities.
Caltech promotes measures aimed at reducing incidents of vio-
lence and the management of situations that may lead to violence.
All members of the Caltech community shall cooperate to maintain
a safe environment and shall comply with this policy.
2.0 Scope
2.2 Definitions
Acts of violence include any physical action, whether intentional
or reckless, that harms or threatens the safety of another individual
at Caltech.
Institute Policies
A threat of violence includes any behavior that by its very nature
could be interpreted by a reasonable person as intent to cause
physical harm to another individual.
106
106 Child abuse includes sexual or emotional abuse of a child, and
physical injury inflicted on a child by another person, excluding
injuries caused by accidental means.
General Information
Campus Security
626-395-5000
JPL Protective Services Division
818-354-3530
107
107
If an individual becomes aware of behavior that they find con-
cerning, the individual should notify one of the following individuals
or offices:
Employee’s supervisor/management
Campus Human Resources – EOD 626-395-8039
Dean of Students 626-395-6351
Dean of Graduate Studies 626-395-6346
Provost Office 626-395-6320
Assistant Vice President for Equity 626-395-3130
And Equity Investigations,
Title IX Coordinator
Campus Security 626 395-5000
Caltech Hotline (anonymous) 626-395-8787 or
888-395-8787
JPL Human Resources 818-354-4447
JPL Protective Services Division 818-354-3530
JPL Workplace Violence Hotline 818-393-2851
JPL Ethics Office 818-354-6338
JPL Ethics Help Line (anonymous) 818-354-9999 or
866-405-7536
Historical
Institute
Sketch
Policies
make a report to the appropriate authorities whenever, in their pro-
fessional capacity, or within the scope of their employment, they
have knowledge of or observe a child they know or reasonably
suspect has been the victim of child abuse or child neglect. All ath-
108
108 letic coaches, including assistant coaches and graduate assistants
involved in coaching are Mandated Reporters. In addition, Institute
employees whose duties bring them into direct contact with chil-
dren under 18 years of age on a regular basis or who supervise
employees whose duties bring them into contact with children on a
regular basis are Mandated Reporters as to child abuse or neglect
occurring at Caltech or at an official activity of, or program con-
ducted by, Caltech. Certain other professionals at Caltech, such as
doctors, nurses and psychologists, are also Mandated Reporters.
Every member of the Caltech community who knows of or
reasonably suspects child abuse or child neglect has a personal
responsibility to report to Caltech Security or the JPL Protective
Services Division immediately. Mandated Reporters have the addi-
tional responsibility to report immediately or as soon as practicably
possible by telephone and to submit a written follow up report
within 36 hours of receiving information concerning the incident to
the LA County Child Protection Hotline (800) 540-4000 (or from out
of state (213) 639-4500) or to the Pasadena Police Department 911
(for emergencies) or (626) 744-4501 (for non-emergencies), or to
another local police department. A Suspected Child Abuse Report
(SCAR) can be completed online (where the initial report was made
to the LA County Child Protection Hotline) at https://mandreptla.
org. Mandated Reports will be provided the opportunity for train-
ing by Caltech and must sign an “Employee Acknowledgement of
Mandated Reporter Status.”
General Information
Campus
Staff and Faculty Consultation Center 626-395-8360
Human Resources -EOD 626-395-8039
109
109
JPL
Human Resources 818-354-4447
Empathia/Life Matters 800-367-7474
Related Policies
• Unlawful Harassment
• Procedures Regarding Unlawful Harassment
• Gender-Based Misconduct
• Procedures for Responding to and Resolving Complaints of
Gender-Based Misconduct
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
1.0 Policy
It is important to Caltech that employees disclose violations or
potential violations of law or other serious breaches of conduct
without the fear of retaliation. Caltech policy prohibits retaliation
against an individual who makes a good faith disclosure of sus-
pected wrongful conduct. Any individual who engages in retaliation
in violation of this policy will be subject to disciplinary action up to
and including termination of employment or permanent separation
from Caltech.
It is Caltech’s policy to comply with applicable laws and regula-
tions, including California’s whistleblower law protections provided
under Labor Code Section 1102.5 and the whistleblower rights and
remedies provided under 41 USC Section 4712, which are summa-
rized at Enhancement of Employee Whistleblower. As employees
of Caltech, each individual is responsible for making sure his or
her conduct fully complies with all laws and regulations as well as
Institute policies. Caltech expects employees with knowledge of
specific acts that they reasonably believe violate the law or Caltech
policy to disclose those acts to an appropriate Caltech official.
2.0 Reporting
An employee who becomes aware of any inappropriate or improp-
er activity, or who believes they have been the subject of retaliation
for making a good faith disclosure, is encouraged to contact their
supervisor or one of the following offices: Human Resources, JPL
Ethics Office, Audit Services and Institute Compliance (ASIC), or
the Office of General Counsel. Anyone with questions or concerns
regarding inappropriate or improper activities within Caltech may
use one of the anonymous reporting mechanisms outlined below.
Historical
Institute
Sketch
Policies
Web Hotline:
http://asic.caltech.edu/hotline.htm
Telephone Hotline:
110 (626) 395-8787 or Toll Free (888) 395-8787
Interoffice Mail:
Audit Services and Institute Compliance
MC 250-64
U.S. Mail:
Audit Services and Institute Compliance
1200 E. California Blvd
MC 250-64
Pasadena, CA 91125
General Information
111
Historical
Institute Policies
Sketch