Mock vs. Garland
Mock vs. Garland
Mock vs. Garland
No. 23-10319
___________
Plaintiffs—Appellants,
versus
Defendants—Appellees.
______________________________
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
1
Judge Haynes concurs only in part: she concurs in the order of an expedited appeal.
With respect to the request for a preliminary injunction pending appeal, as a member of the
motions panel, she would grant an administrative stay to the plaintiffs in this case as to the
Case: 23-10319 Document: 52-2 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/23/2023
No. 23-10319
Per Curiam:
IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is EXPEDITED to the next
available Oral Argument Calendar.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellants’ Opposed Motion
For a Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal is GRANTED as to the
Plaintiffs in this case. See Fed. R. App. P. 8; Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S.
418 (2009).
challenged Final Rule for a brief period of time and defer the question of the injunction pending
appeal to the oral argument merits panel which receives this case.