Distintos Blancos Contra Ticks
Distintos Blancos Contra Ticks
Distintos Blancos Contra Ticks
12339
CEK,
J. DE LA FUENTE,1,2,† P. KOPA 3,†
A. LEW-TABOR4,5,† & C. MARITZ-OLIVIER6,†
1
on en Recursos Cinegeticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain, 2Department of Veterinary
SaBio, Instituto de Investigaci
Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA, 3Institute of Parasitology, Biology
Centre Czech Academy of Sciences, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 4Queensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation, The
University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, Australia, 5Centre for Comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia,
6
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
tissues, impairing tick feeding on the immunized hosts targets (Achilles’ heels) that could be affected by anti-
(7–9). The application of the BM86/BM95-based vaccines bodies present in vaccinated hosts. In this section, we will
results in reduction of the number, weight and repro- enumerate the physiological processes that are targeted to
ductive capacity of engorging female ticks, resulting in date (Figure 1) and link the research findings to our cur-
a gradual reduction in tick infestations in subsequent rent understanding and approaches for the development of
generations (7). efficacious tick vaccines.
The application of commercial vaccines for the control
of cattle ticks demonstrated that tick vaccines also consti-
Tick attachment and on-host feeding
tute an effective and environmentally sound approach for
the control of TBDs (7). However, despite recent advances Blocking attachment of a tick to the host would be the
in the identification and characterization of candidate tick ultimate goal, impairing not only tick feeding but also
vaccine antigens, new tick and pathogen-derived protective transmission of tick-borne pathogens. The process of
antigens need to be identified to increase vaccine efficacy attachment starts with the intrusion of the tick mouthpart
for the control of TBDs (6, 10). Herein, we review some (hypostome) into the host dermis, followed by anchoring
of the major approaches and strategies that are currently of the tick by a cement cone that is mostly comprises of
being used for the identification of protective antigens, as secreted glycine-rich proteins (11).
well as some future trends to develop improved tick vac- Several cement cone antigens have been identified based
cines. on their immunogenicity. Screening of a cDNA expression
library from Haemaphysalis longicornis females, with rab-
bit immune serum raised against tick saliva, resulted in
FROM TICK BIOLOGY TO TICK VACCINES: A
the identification of a collagen-like protein P29 (12) and
RATIONAL APPROACH
an unannotated protein HL 34 (that is rich in tyrosine and
The rational approach towards discovery of promising proline residue repeats) (13). Immunization of rabbits with
vaccine candidates that will impair biological processes recombinant P29 caused about 50% mortality of H. longi-
stems from our knowledge of specific features in tick phys- cornis larvae and nymphs (12). Immunization with recHL
iology that evolved during the adaptation of an ancestor 34 reduced survival of both immature and adult H. longi-
mite to an obligatory blood-feeding lifestyle. Therefore, cornis stages. The appearance of ticks fed on vaccinated
the processes were associated with tick attachment to the hosts points to impaired blood meal uptake and digestion
host, followed by undisturbed feeding on the host, intra- (13).
cellular digestion of the large amount of ingested blood Two vaccine candidates were identified from the cement
and finally, processing of the blood meal into huge cone of the African brown ear tick, Rhipicephalus appen-
clutches of eggs laid by the engorged females. To date, this diculatus. A highly immunogenic glycine-rich protein RIM
approach has offered a number of potential vulnerable 36 has the potential to be developed into a diagnostic
marker for detection of cattle that have been exposed to Metis 1. Vaccination had no effect on tick attachment and
feeding ticks; however, its protective effect as a vaccine has mortality, but reduced the engorgement weight of I. ricinus
not been assessed (14). In contrast, a secreted 15 kDa pro- females and their ability to lay eggs (20). A slight increase
tein called 64P seems to be invisible to the host immune in mortality (some 15%) was reported for H. longicornis
response most likely given its similarity to the mammalian nymphs and adults fed on rabbits vaccinated with recom-
skin keratins (15). The N-terminal portion of 64P displays binant metalloprotease HLMP1 (21). Most recently, pro-
similarity with the a2 chain of collagen type IV and exhib- tective potential of the R. microplus metalloprotease
ited very promising protection in animal trials when BrRm-MP4 against R. microplus was tested in cattle trials.
expressed as truncated 64P constructs (64TRPs) with glu- The overall efficacy of vaccination with recombinant
tathione S-transferase (GST) as a fusion protein. The vac- BrRm-MP4 was 60%, mainly reducing the number of
cine based on 64TRPs was reported to have a ‘dual engorged ticks that completed feeding on immunized cattle
action’ as tick feeding on immunized animals was primar- (22).
ily impaired at the skin feeding site, but cross-reaction of
anti-64TRP antibodies with midgut antigenic epitopes also
Protease inhibitors
caused rupture of the tick midgut and death of engorged
ticks (15). In addition, several 64TRPs exhibited a cross- A number of host defence reactions such as blood coagu-
protective response against other tick species, namely lation and complement activation are mediated by cas-
Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Ixodes ricinus, underscoring cades of serine proteases (23). Recombinant serine
their potential as a broad-spectrum tick vaccine (16). protease inhibitors (serpins) from several tick species have
Intriguingly, it was later demonstrated in a mouse model been examined as candidate vaccine targets. HLS2 from
that vaccination with 64TRPs antigens protected mice H. longicornis resulted in some 40% mortality of nymphs
against lethal transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus and adults fed on immunized rabbits (24, 25). Four ser-
by still unknown mechanisms (17). However, these results pins, termed RAS-1-4 identified from R. appendiculatus
were obtained in rodent models (guinea pigs and mice), (26), were tested either as a mix of recombinant RAS-1
with no evidence that it is effective in protection against and RAS-2 (27) or as a cocktail composed of three anti-
tick infestation in natural hosts such as cattle. gens, RAS-3, RAS-4 and the immune-dominant RIM36
(28). Immunization of cattle with recombinant RAS-1 and
RAS-2 reduced the number of engorged R. appendiculatus
Proteases and protease inhibitors at the tick–host
nymphs by 60% and increased mortality of adult males
interface
and females by 43% and 28%, respectively (27). A combi-
Tick saliva is an extremely rich cocktail of bioactive com- nation of RAS-3, RAS-4 and RIM6 mainly affected the
pounds that facilitates ixodid ticks to feed undisturbed on mortality of Theileria parva-infected females (~50%) (28).
the host for several days. Our knowledge about the mole- The recombinant serpin, IRIS from I. ricinus, exerted a
cules produced by tick salivary glands (sialomes) increased significant protective immunity against nymphs and adults
dramatically during the past decade due to high-through- fed on vaccinated rabbits as displayed by increases in mor-
put transcriptome-based approaches (for review, see Ref. tality (~30%), reduced weight of engorged ticks and pro-
(18)). Most of the bioactive compounds modulating host longed feeding time. No effect was obtained for nymphs
haemostasis, immune and inflammatory response are fed on vaccinated mice (29).
members of multigene families. This observation may Another group of tick protease inhibitors that are con-
lower the potential of individual saliva molecules as vac- sidered as possible candidate antigens are cystatins that
cine candidates given their extreme redundancy, but other inhibit a variety of cysteine peptidases involved in modula-
possibilities to target these antigens during vaccination are tion of host immunity and inflammation (30). Sera from
discussed later in this article. Despite the great redundancy guinea pigs that were repeatedly exposed to tick infesta-
of these proteins, some promising results have been tion did not recognize sialostatin L2, a secreted
reported for tick proteases and protease inhibitors immunomodulatory cystatin from Ixodes scapularis sali-
involved in tick–host interactions. vary glands. This antigen was subsequently termed as ‘si-
lent’ antigen by the authors (31). It does however need to
be confirmed that this observation is not due to the anti-
Metalloproteases
gen not being processed in antigen presenting cells, vs.
The protective ability of Metis 1, a member of a putative being secreted into an environment where immune-sup-
metalloprotease family from salivary glands of I. ricinus pression is occurring due to tick saliva proteins. After all,
(19), was tested on rabbits immunized with recombinant a vast number of salivary gland proteins are not
recognized by immune sera, but they remain immunogenic osmoregulatory system. No vaccination effect with recombi-
upon vaccination. Nevertheless, feeding of I. scapularis nant RmAQP2 has been reported to date.
nymphs on guinea pigs vaccinated with Sialostatin L2 was
impaired as early rejection of the nymphs occurred as well
Blood digestion
as a reduction in the ability of remaining nymphs to
imbibe blood (31). Similar results were reported for the Blood meal processing occurs intracellularly within the
cystatin OmC2 from the soft tick, Ornithodoros moubata. digestive cells of the tick gut epithelium (11) and is per-
Vaccination of mice with recombinant OmC2 significantly formed by an orchestrated network of acidic peptidases
reduced the number of O. moubata first nymphal stage comprising aspartic endopeptidases of the cathepsin D-
capable to complete feeding, resulting in increased post- type, cysteine endo- and exopeptidases of the papain type
engorgement mortality (32). As OmC2 is expressed in (cathepsin L, B and C) and asparaginyl endopeptidases of
both the salivary gland and gut tissues of O. moubata, the the legumaintype (for review, see Ref. (42)). This multi-
authors speculated about a possible ‘dual’ action that enzyme digestive apparatus may seem to offer multiple
impairs both feeding (via interfering with modulation of potential antigens for efficient tick control, as suggested
host immune response) and blood digestion (32). More by the results of RNAi-mediated silencing of individual
recently, identification and characterization of cystatins peptidases in several tick species (42–44). However, to our
from other tick species, namely R. appendiculatus, R. mi- knowledge, no successful vaccination experiment using a
croplus and Ixodes ovatus, were reported and the immuno- recombinant tick digestive enzyme has been reported to
genicity of corresponding recombinants tested as a first this end. Experimental vaccination of rabbits with a cock-
step towards their assessment as tick vaccine candidates tail of recombinant cathepsins D, B, L, C and legumain
(33–35). from I. ricinus has been performed (45). Despite high anti-
body titres against all of the recombinant antigens, only a
slight increase in the mortality of I. ricinus females was
Water balance
observed in two of the three vaccinated rabbits. Currently,
Osmoregulation and water balance play an extremely the potential of targeting multiple tick digestive peptidases
important role in tick physiology as a fully engorged ixodid by vaccination is limited given the high redundancy of the
female tick can imbibe 200–300 times her own weight of system, as previously demonstrated by specific inhibition
host blood. The blood meal is concentrated in the gut with of a subset of enzymes (46). The possibility of targeting
about 70% of the fluid being returned to the host via saliva- unique protein–protein interaction (PPI) sites that may be
tion (11, 36). Therefore, water channels (aquaporins) pre- more evolutionary conserved is discussed later in this
sent another rational target for vaccine development (37, article.
38). The function of aquaporin was examined in I. ricinus
by RNAi silencing of an aquaporin termed IrAQP1, result-
Heme and iron metabolism
ing in 50% weight reduction of semi-engorged females that
fed for 5 days. Vaccination experiments remain to be per- Ticks have to cope with an excess of toxic heme and iron-
formed for IrAQP1 (39). Three aquaporins have been identi- derived metabolites from their blood meal. The majority
fied in the cattle tick R. microplus, and the vaccination of heme is detoxified via its accumulation in organelles
potential of RmAQP1 was recently tested. Two independent called haemosomes (47) of which only a small portion is
pen trials (conducted in Brazil using Holstein-Friesian used for tick’s own metabolic demands as they are not
calves vaccinated with Pichia-expressed recombinant capable of heme biosynthesis (48, 49). The nonheme iron
RmAQP1) exerted a high efficacy with 75% and 68% is sequestered intracellularly by ferritin 1 (Fer1), which is
decrease, respectively, in the number of adult ticks that com- related to mammalian heavy-chain ferritins (50). Their
pleted feeding (40). This result promotes RmAQP1 among expression was shown to be post-transcriptionally regu-
the most promising vaccine candidates that should be fur- lated by an iron-responsive protein (IRP) (51). Transport
ther tested against cattle ticks in different geographic of nonheme iron from the tick gut to peripheral tissues is
regions. More recently, stage and tissue expression profile mediated by a secreted ferritin 2 protein (Fer2) that is dis-
and functional assessment by RNAi were reported for tinct from tick ferritin 1 and mammalian ferritins (51).
R. microplus aquaporin 2 (RmAQP2) (41). RmAQP2 was The critical functions of tick ferritins in tick development
found predominantly expressed in the salivary glands of and reproduction were demonstrated by RNAi-mediated
semi-engorged females, and RNAi-mediated silencing silencing in I. ricinus (51) and H. longicornis (52, 53). To
resulted in a minor increase of the body weight of engorged date, much emphasis has been placed on tick Fer2 as it
females, pointing towards impairment of the displays other desired attributes expected from an ideal
concealed antigen, including: (i) not being present in the mating status. An engorgement factor that is passed from
mammalian host; (ii) it is encoded by a single gene (no males to females during copulation was identified in Ambly-
redundancy problem); (iii) it is expressed in the gut and oma hebraeum and termed voraxin (60). It is composed of
therefore can come into contact with antibodies taken up two unrelated peptides tagged AHEFa and AHEFb of 161
by a blood meal from a vaccinated host; and (iv) it was and 116 kDa, respectively. During vaccination trials in rab-
shown to be highly immunogenic as a recombinant pro- bits using a mixture of recombinant AHEFa and AHEFb,
tein. In the first pilot experiments, vaccination of rabbits only 25% of normally mated A. hebraeum females were cap-
with recombinant Fer2 from I. ricinus substantially able to fully engorge (60). The potential of voraxin as a
reduced tick infestation, weight of engorged females and vaccine candidate was also evaluated against R. appendicu-
their fertility with an overall efficacy of 98% (54). In the latus. Immunization of rabbits with recombinant voraxin a
same study, vaccination of cattle with recombinant Fer2 reduced the weight of engorged R. appendiculatus ticks by
from R. microplus was reported to exert comparable effi- some 40% and also significantly impaired subsequent
cacy of about 60% (which was similar to that of the Bm86 oviposition and larval hatching efficacy (61).
antigen used as positive control) in protection against
R. microplus. Some 70% protection was observed against
Vitellogenesis and fertility
Rhipicephalus annulatus (54). The vaccination potential of
Fer1 and Fer2 from H. longicornis has been evaluated Impairment of vitellogenesis, embryogenesis and fertility
using a rabbit model. Immunization with recombinant by vaccination would be meaningful especially to control
H. longicornis Fer2 resulted in a significant reduction of the population of one-host ticks such as R. microplus.
body weight with reduced oviposition and hatching Three enzymes involved in vitellogenin processing in
observed for both groups immunized with Fer1 and Fer2 R. microplus eggs have been identified and characterized
(55). Most recently, the vaccination potential of other to date. These include two aspartic peptidases, the Boophi-
molecules possibly playing a role in tick heme and iron lus yolk pro-cathepsin (BYC) (62) and tick heme-binding
metabolic pathways of I. ricinus was screened using RNAi aspartic peptidase (63), as well as a cathepsin L-like vitel-
and experimental vaccination of rabbits (56). In addition logenin degrading cysteine endopeptidase (VTDCE) (64).
to Fer1, Fer2 and IRP (see above), RNAi screening also Bovine immunization was performed with native or recom-
evaluated transferrin 2 (Trf2), a divalent metal transporter binant BYC and VTDCE and the individual enzymes con-
1 (Dmt1), ferrochelatase (Fech), heme-binding lipoprotein ferred only limited protection (some 25%) in overall
(HeLp), heme responsive gene 1 (HRG1) and vitellogenins efficacy (65–68). A combination of recombinant BYC and
1 and 2 (Vg1, Vg2). Results from both RNAi and vaccina- VTDCE and the previously mentioned GST from
tion studies concluded that none of these molecules sur- H. longicornis was evaluated as a cocktail vaccine in field
passed Fer2 with regard to their impact on tick conditions (69). The number of semi-engorged females fed
development and reproduction efficiency. on the vaccinated cattle was reduced by about 50%, which
seems to correlate with increased body weight gain in the
vaccinated calves. This desired result further underscores
Detoxification
the potential of multi-antigenic vaccines that might be
Glutathione S-transferases from numerous parasites have capable to provide protection against ticks and maybe also
been shown to play an important role in metabolic detoxi- against the diseases they transmit.
fication of xenobiotics, reactive oxygen species, heme and
other toxic compounds, and as such present as a promis-
REVERSE GENETICS APPROACH TO TICK
ing antigens for antiparasitic vaccines (57, 58). The protec-
VACCINES
tive potential of one such GST was examined using
H. longicornis GST in cattle trials against R. microplus
Tick genomic and sequence resources
infestations (59). Given its cross-reactivity with other tick
proteins, three of four calves immunized with recombinant Innovations in genome sequencing technologies have pro-
H. longicornis GST displayed some 50% reduction of gressed the fields of reverse genetics and reverse vaccinol-
engorged R. microplus adults. ogy (RV). Fewer genome projects have been developed for
tick species due to their large genome sizes and the pres-
ence of dense repetitive regions. For example, the genome
Mating
sizes for I. scapularis and R. microplus were estimated at
The ability of ixodid females to initiate and complete the 21 and 71 Gb, respectively, with repetitive sequences
rapid engorgement phase of feeding is determined by their occurring in a mixture of long and short period
Table 1 Examples of EST and transcriptome sequencing studies for selected tick species
Amblyomma Larvae, nymph, adult male, EST Sanger 14 310 ESTs (81)
americanum adult female, engorged female sequencing
Amblyomma Female feeding salivary glands; 454 Roche 11 240; 4604; 3796 (168)
triste, A. nymphs (A. triste only) (coding sequences, CDSs)
parvum,
A. cajennense
Dermacentor Salivary glands from: unfed, 454 Roche 21 769 CDSs (169)
andersoni 2 and 5 day fed
(female adults)
Haemaphysalis Female salivary glands Illumina 54 357 transcripts (170)
flava
Ixodes ricinus Female mid-gut Ion torrent 60 693 transcripts (76)
Haemocytes (females), 454 and Illumina 2860 CDSs (454); (171, 172)
mid-gut, salivary glands 24 687 CDSs (Illumina)
(nymphs, females and males)
Larvae and female salivary Illumina ~over 27 000 transcripts (173)
glands
Ixodes Nymphs and female mid-guts Illumina 17 503 transcripts (114)
scapularis and salivary glands
ISE6 cells Illumina 37 990 transcripts (115)
Rhipicephalus Unfed and fed female Illumina/Solexa 25 113 transcripts; cysteine (174)
haemaphysaloides salivary glands proteases up-regulated in feeding ticks
Rhipicephalus Larvae, nymph, feeding female EST sanger CattleTickBase – 18 Gb of gene (74)
(Boophilus) ticks, female organs, male ticks sequencing; enriched genome regions; assembled
microplus Cot enriched transcriptome (RmiTr Version 10) with
sequences; 454 28 893 sequences (24 673 517 bp)
interspersions with 65–80% of the DNA following a pat- particularly salivary glands (sialome) and/or the mid-guts
tern of short period interspersions (70). Since this publica- (mialome). Although EST libraries have been used to
tion in 2005, the I. scapularis genome assembly was develop custom microarrays to examine up- and down-
reported at 389 coverage from 369 495 scaffolds built regulation of tick genes in different samples (77, 78), this
using 570 637 contigs with a total number of 20 486 cod- review will focus on sequencing technologies only. Table 1
ing genes (GenBank Accession: ABJB000000000.1 Ixodes provides examples of EST and transcriptome sequencing
scapularis strain Wikel colony (71)). A preliminary 18 Gb studies for selected tick species.
of the R. microplus gene enriched genome sequence has
been reported (72). McCooke et al. (73) reported that Cat-
Introduction to reverse genetics and applications to tick
tleTickBase is a database that contains all of the sequences
research
from the R. microplus genome sequencing project, pre-
sently at ~49 coverage with Pac Bio (74). Thus, the Forward genetic methods in eukaryotes have been used for
sequencing of the whole R. microplus genome is proceed- more than 100 years to identify the genes responsible for
ing with only preliminary data published to date including a particular phenotype, reviewed by Hardy et al. (79).
several BAC clones and the mitochondrial genome of the Reverse genetics consists of modifying the activity of a tar-
Deutsch Texas R. microplus strain (73, 75). Recently, pre- get gene to determine the phenotypic consequences. Modi-
liminary genome sequence data for Ixodes ricinus were fications to the genome are implemented by random
reported with ~998 million paired-end reads (~479 cover- chemical or insertional mutagenesis (e.g. transposons or
age, approximately 63% of the total coding sequences) retroviruses), or specifically using homologous recombina-
from Ilumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA HiSeqTM next- tion of a target gene (79). Other approaches targeting
generation sequencing (GenBank Accession Numbers: mRNA include morpholino antisense oligonucleotides and
JXMZ01000000 and SRP051465) (76). Due to the com- RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi has shown to be effi-
plexity of tick genomes, EST and next-generation tran- cient in post-transcriptional gene silencing using exoge-
scriptome sequencing projects have been undertaken to nous or endogenous double-stranded RNAs to
inform researchers in terms of the identity of specific knockdown specific transcripts (80). For reverse genetics
genes up-regulated by different organs in feeding ticks, approaches, ideally the whole-genome sequence is required
to screen and predict the specificity of these knockdown any time followed by the screening for protective immunity
treatments. In addition, genome sequencing has identified as the ‘rate-limiting’ step (87). Reverse vaccinology has so
genes with unassigned functions. Assigning functions to far been successful for the development of novel antibacte-
these genes can be achieved by predicting subcellular rial vaccines with relatively small genomes in comparison
localizations of gene products and by describing the phe- to ectoparasites such as ticks (88). With the completion of
notypes associated with their disruption (79). Thus, essen- the I. scapularis genome, this provides an opportunity to
tially high-throughput reverse genetic approaches are develop a tick specific RV approach. Approaches devel-
major tools in the post-genomic era. oped to predict vaccine antigens in ticks to date have not
A challenge with tick sequence analysis is the presence of been undertaken using complete whole-genome data. One
a large number of genes whose functions are both unknown study has used a B-cell epitope prediction programme
and unpredicted. These have been called ‘orphan genes’ (BCPREDS) to examine I. scapularis salivary proteins;
which lack detectable sequence homology to genes in pre- however, in vivo confirmation of the immunogenicity of
existing databases (81). For ticks, the most exploited reverse these proteins was not demonstrated (89). In addition, 24-
genetic approach has been RNAi (82). For the most part, h fed I. scapularis tick saliva proteins were expressed using
tick researchers have developed dsRNA treatments in the phage display and panned using antibodies to identify
absence of complete genome sequences despite strong evi- immunogenic proteins which could affect early feeding
dence for ‘off-target-effects’ demonstrated in model organ- events including pathogen transmission, with no further
isms as well as ticks (83, 84). Model genome sequences have testing reported (90). A RV approach for soft ticks has
also been mined to identify homologues in tick species of been described as a concept paper only (91).
interest. For example, the investigation of R. (B.) microplus The most researched tick species in terms of RV
RNAi phenotypes utilized Drosophila melanogaster (fruit approaches has focused on the identification of vaccine
fly) homologues for cellular viability (85). In addition, to candidates to protect against the cattle tick R. microplus
identify proteins associated with the tick RNAi pathway, fly species complex (including Rhipicephalus australis and
and nematode homologues were used to mine R. microplus specific clades of R. microplus and R. annulatus) (92;
EST sequences (86) and available I. scapularis genome Table 2). These ticks collectively vector babesiosis and
reads. Thirty-one putative proteins were identified including anaplasmosis to susceptible cattle across cattle popula-
a putative tick Dicer, RISC-associated proteins and an tions worldwide causing widespread losses (93, 94). One
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase not previously identified approach mined the BmGI EST database available in
in arthropod species (85). 2007 and sequences from subtraction library experiments
(86, 95) for specific Pfam database (96) signatures of
putative antigenic proteins (97). Localization of the Pfam
Predictive algorithms for RV based tick vaccine
identified 400 ESTs included qRT-PCR analysis of differ-
candidate identification
ent tick stages and organs collected from susceptible and
Reverse vaccinology is defined as the screening of all open resistant breeds of cattle and secretion predictions (Sig-
reading frames that a particular pathogen can express at nalP), followed by the prediction of linear B-cell binding
Table 2 Reverse genetics and high-throughput reverse vaccinology approaches applied for tick vaccine candidate identification
Data or vaccine
Species Reverse genetics approaches output References
Ixodes scapularis Linear predictions of B-cell epitopes in salivary proteins (BCPREDS) Not tested (89)
Phage display of 24 h tick saliva expressed genes screened using antibodies 182 contigs identified, (90)
No further testing
Ornithodoros Secreted salivary proteins and concealed mid-gut antigens shown to be critical Review paper (91)
soft ticks to the function of the tick; low copy number gene; and shared conserved
epitopes among several tick species
Rhipicephalus Gene discovery (EST library, subtraction libraries, microarray analysis, Ongoing (97)
(Boophilus) CattleTickBase), Bepipred predictions of linear B-cell epitopes, qRT-PCR
microplus screening, predicted SignalP and localization screening, anti-B-cell peptide
antibody in vitro tick feeding
EST library, DNA microarrays, membrane and secreted proteins, VaxiJen, Ongoing (101)
mouse antiserum screening
Systems biology, CattleTickBase, RNA interference screening, in silico 75% protection (40)
antigenicity
Figure 2 Vaccinomics pipeline for the development of vaccines for the control of tick infestations and pathogen infection/transmission.
Vaccinomics refers to a holistic approach based on the use of genome-scale or omics technologies and bioinformatics for systems biology
analysis of host–tick–pathogen interactions for the development of next-generation vaccines.
vaccinomics (107, 109). Recent results using the Ixodes as involved in tick–pathogen interactions (107). These
scapularis–host–Anaplasma phagocytophilum model illus- proteins were selected as candidate protective antigens
trated the possibilities of these new technologies for the based on their putative role in tick–Anaplasma marginale
identification of key molecules and pathways involved in (Silk (117)), tick–Babesia bigemina (Trospa (118)) and
tick–host–pathogen interactions. tick–pathogen (Subolesin (119)) interactions. First, tran-
scriptome analyses were combined with RNAi studies to
Characterization of I. scapularis–host– identify Silk and Trospa as candidate protective antigens
A. phagocytophilum interactions (117, 118). Tick Subolesin, the ortholog of insect and ver-
tebrate Akirin, was discovered in 2002 as a tick protective
Transcriptomics and proteomics have been used for the char-
antigen in I. scapularis by expression library immunization
acterization of I. scapularis–host–A. phagocytophilum molec-
in a mouse model of tick infestations (120). Both tran-
ular interactions (18, 110, 111). However, only recently the
scriptomics and RNAi experiments have shown its role as
integration of additional data sets from metabolomics studies
a transcription factor required for the regulation of differ-
has been applied to the study of the I. scapularis–A. phagocy-
ent processes including the innate immune response to
tophilum interface (112–116). The results of these analyses
pathogen infection (119, 121, 122). Then, in vitro capillary
showed that A. phagocytophilum has evolved common
feeding was used to characterize their potential as antigens
molecular mechanisms to establish infection in tick vectors
for the control of both cattle tick infestations and infec-
and vertebrate hosts (111). These strategies include, but are
tion with A. marginale and B. bigemina (123). Recombi-
not limited to, remodelling of the cytoskeleton, inhibition of
nant proteins were produced in Escherichia coli, purified
cell apoptosis, manipulation of the immune response and the
and used to generate antibodies in rabbits. Purified rabbit
use of rickettsial proteins for infection and manipulation of
polyclonal antibodies were added to uninfected or infected
tick and host gene expression (111).
bovine blood to capillary-feed female R. microplus ticks.
Capillary-fed ticks ingested antibodies added to the blood
Vaccinomics approach for the identification of candidate
meal and a reduction in tick weight and/or oviposition
tick protective antigens
was shown when compared with controls fed with blood
For the proof of concept of the vaccinomics approach in alone (123). However, no effect was observed on pathogen
ticks, a pipeline was designed based on proteins identified DNA levels in capillary-fed ticks (123). Nevertheless, these
results together with previous results of functional studies (128–133). In ticks, gene duplications are most likely one
by RNAi suggested that these proteins are promising vac- of the strongest driving forces (125–128, 131, 133). There-
cine antigens for the control of R. microplus infestations fore, our understandings of tick evolution, protein struc-
and infection with A. marginale and B. bigemina and sup- ture and function are vital in the search of new and
ported the conduction of vaccine trials to validate these improved tick vaccines. Furthermore, current data indicate
antigens (9). Vaccination studies showed that vaccination that hard and soft ticks adapted independently and that
with Silk and Subolesin, but not Trospa, reduced tick the large protein families seem to be lineage specific expan-
infestations and oviposition with respect to ticks fed on sions that occurred after their divergence. This strongly
placebo-treated control cattle (124). Furthermore, the suggests that a universal tick vaccine is nonviable and that
results also showed that vaccination with Trospa and Sub- focus should be placed on finding targets within subsets of
olesin reduced B. bigemina DNA levels in ticks while vac- closely related tick genera or even species. Cautions should
cination with Silk and Subolesin resulted in lower thus be placed on extrapolating the protective abilities of a
A. marginale DNA levels when compared with ticks fed specific antigen between tick species, as was seen in the
on placebo control cattle (124). case of Bm86 vaccines (134–139) and a vast number of
These results prove the validity of the vaccinomics antigens that failed to protect against different tick species
approach to select protective antigens and show that vacci- across different hosts (as summarized in Ref. (140)).
nes using tick proteins involved in vector–pathogen inter- Evaluation of all animal vaccine trials carried out to date
actions could be used for the dual control of tick indicates that single antigens display only some 40–60% pro-
infestations and pathogen infection. Remarkably, vaccina- tection under controlled conditions (140). From experience,
tion with Subolesin has shown an effect on the reduction we know that these levels of protection will be greatly
of infestations by different ectoparasites and infection by reduced under field conditions. This should stress the need
different pathogens, therefore suggesting the possibility of to develop combinatorial tick vaccines and to expand our
developing vaccines for the control of multiple ectopara- ideas on what a ‘targetable’ genome may be in ticks. For
sites and infection/transmission of vector-borne pathogens example, a proteome’s complexity arises not only from the
(6). Additionally, vaccinomics approach also results in the proteins three-dimensional structure (lower level informa-
identification of pathogen-derived candidate protective tion), but also from its functional interactions (higher level).
antigens (116). In this way, the combination of tick- This suggests an organized modularity for a proteome with
derived with pathogen-derived antigens might results in connections to regulators, mediators and adaptors, all open-
more effective vaccines for the control of TBDs (6). ing up a huge new complexity for therapeutic intervention.
We are entering an era where our understanding of how
ticks evade vaccination and immune responses with their
INSIGHT FROM TICK PROTEIN EVOLUTION:
highly repetitive genomes, and how to formulate our vacci-
TARGETING OF BINDING SPECIFIC EPITOPES
nes to ensure that protective epitopes remain accessible is
(PPIS) AND CONSERVED METABOLIC
vital. To date, only two examples of promising combinato-
PATHWAYS
rial vaccines are known that of BM86 and subolesin (6,
From a previous section of this article describing the gen- 107) and the peptide vaccine derived from a RV approach
omes sizes and repetitive nature of tick genomes, one is (Table 2) (41). Although not fully understood, the func-
faced with questions pertaining to the origin(s) and signifi- tions of BM86 and Subolesin are most likely to be differ-
cance of these large tick genomes and its impact on vac- ent based on the phenotypes observed after vaccination
cine design. Leading studies from the group of Ben J with individual antigens and the subcellular localization of
Mans have provided significant evidence for not only gene the antigens. Based on this consideration, a new vaccine
duplication leading to protein superfamilies, but also evi- formulation containing a combination of BM86 and Subo-
dence that at least one genome duplication event occurred lesin was recently patented claiming synergy between these
for ticks (125–127). Evidence is growing on how rapid antigens resulting in higher vaccine efficacy against cattle
ticks can adapt to new climates, host species and chal- tick infestations (6). The true mechanism underlying the
lenges set by the use of acaricides, stressing their ability to protective ability of the latter combination, as well as the
acquire novel properties and functions within a short per- RV-derived combination, remains to be elucidated.
iod of time. The adaptability of parasitic organisms has
been ascribed to various factors including gene duplica-
Protein–protein interactions and metabolic pathways
tion, molecular chaperones, antigenic variation, polymor-
phisms, molecular mimicry, rapid turnover of surface It is well known that protein sequences are more con-
molecules and gene disruption to name but a few served than their coding nucleotide sequences, and that
protein folds are more conserved than the amino acid expressed in R. appendiculatus (155). No characterization
sequences encoding them. Even more conserved are the of proteins that cross-react with immune sera (as is the
active site residues of enzymes and the binding specific case with sera raised against subolesin that show signifi-
epitopes occurring in PPIs. Proteins function not merely cant cross-reactivity) has been attempted. If one considers
as single entities, but display their roles by interacting with gene duplications in tick genomes, tick proteins may well
other cellular components, as seen in the case of signalling make use of ‘misleading’ surfaces with immunogenic epi-
pathways and signal transduction, cytoskeleton arrange- topes, which will not necessarily be protective epitopes.
ment and re-arrangement, biological recognition in the This raises questions to the number of antigens that failed
immune system, enzyme regulation and gene expression in animal trials and are being discarded as potential vac-
(141). In ticks, transcriptome analyses have identified pro- cine candidates.
teins acting in almost all of the latter pathways, but no In ticks, only a single yeast two-hybrid study has been
studies have been performed to validate core pathways conducted, resulting in the identification of binding-part-
and to better understand the PPIs occurring in these path- ners of subolesin (121). Since then, additional cDNA
ways. Without this information, our understanding of tick libraries have been cloned into various two-hybrid bait
biology and number of vaccine candidates and drug tar- and prey plasmids, resulting in the identification of addi-
gets that can be evaluated remains inefficient. tional PPIs in R. microplus (patents pending). The protec-
In the case of developing vaccines against parasites such tive ability of these protein–protein interacting antigens is
as Plasmodium (the causative agent of malaria), Mycobac- currently being evaluated in cattle vaccine trials. Recently,
terium tuberculosis and Toxoplasma (the causative agent surface plasmon resonance was used to confirm the PPI
of toxoplasmosis), PPIs have shaped the field significantly between boophilin from R. microplus and thrombin (156).
as it filled major gaps in the knowledge of parasite biology In combination with the available crystal structure data
and provided new vaccine targets, screens for parasite–host (157), this opens an exciting era to evaluate the use of pro-
interactions and defining protective vs. decoy conforma- tein binding epitopes as vaccines and to screen peptide
tional epitopes which may have a tremendous impact on and chemical libraries for small molecules or peptides cap-
the potential of antigens as protective vaccine candidates able of disrupting the PPIs between boophilin and throm-
(Figure 3) (142–151). To date, only limited studies on bin.
Bm86 have evaluated epitopes as being protective or decoy With regard to PPIs involved in vector–pathogen–
epitopes (152–154). Only one study on the mechanism(s) mammalian host interphases, the Borrelia burgdorferi
used by ticks to overcome Bm86 vaccination is available, field (causative agent of Lyme disease) is setting the
indicating that homologous Bm86 coding areas are trend with interactions described for BB0323 and
Figure 3 Schematic presentation of immunogenic epitopes and protein binding epitopes. A tick attached to the host secrets a number of
salivary gland proteins into the feeding pool. Outside of the feeding pool, blood coagulation can occur as normal (cluster of purple and
red cells). The effect of generating antibodies against immunogenic epitopes (yellow boxes) is shown for one of the tick proteins, as well as
the ability of the tick protein to remain biological active bind continuous binding to its host target protein (host factor). The protein–
protein binding sites (PPIs) are indicated with orange boxes. By targeting these PPIs, it may be possible to disrupt biological activity of tick
salivary gland proteins. The same principle can apply to PPIs occurring inside the tick tissues.
REFERENCES
1 Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, et al. Glo- 5 Estrada-Pena A, Ostfeld RS, Peterson AT, 9 Merino O, Almazan C, Canales M, et al.
bal trends in emerging infectious diseases. Poulin R & de la Fuente J. Effects of envi- Targeting the tick protective antigen sub-
Nature 2008; 451: 990–993. ronmental change on zoonotic disease risk: olesin reduces vector infestations and
2 de la Fuente J, Estrada-Pena A, Venzal JM, an ecological primer. Trends Parasitol 2014; pathogen infection by Anaplasma marginale
Kocan KM & Sonenshine DE. Overview: 30: 205–214. and Babesia bigemina. Vaccine 2011; 29:
Ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause 6 de la Fuente J & Contreras M. Tick vacci- 8575–8579.
disease in humans and animals. Front nes: current status and future directions. 10 Schetters T, Bishop R, Crampton M, et al.
Biosci 2008; 13: 6938–6946. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14: 1367–1376. Cattle tick vaccine researchers join forces in
3 Peter RJ, Van den Bossche P, Penzhorn BL 7 de la Fuente J, Almazan C, Canales M, Perez CATVAC. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9: 105 in
& Sharp B. Tick, fly, and mosquito control de la Lastra JM, Kocan KM & Willadsen P. press.
– lessons from the past, solutions for the A ten-year review of commercial vaccine per- 11 Sonenshine DE & Roe RM. Biology of
future. Vet Parasitol 2005; 132: 205–215. formance for control of tick infestations on Ticks. New York, Oxford University Press,
4 Gortazar C, Reperant LA, Kuiken T, et al. cattle. Anim Health Res Rev 2007; 8: 23–28. 2014.
Crossing the interspecies barrier: opening 8 Willadsen P & Kemp DH. Vaccination with 12 Mulenga A, Sugimoto C, Sako Y, et al.
the door to zoonotic pathogens. PLoS ‘concealed’ antigens for tick control. Para- Molecular characterization of a Haema-
Pathog 2014; 10: e1004129. sitol Today 1988; 4: 196–198. physalis longicornis tick salivary gland-
associated 29-kilodalton protein and its Rhiphicephalus appendiculatus; cDNA clon- of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus
effect as a vaccine against tick infestation in ing and preliminary characterization. Insect reduces tick fitness. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8:
rabbits. Infect Immun 1999; 67: 1652–1658. Biochem Mol Biol 2003; 33: 267–276. 618.
13 Tsuda A, Mulenga A, Sugimoto C, Naka- 27 Imamura S, Namangala B, Tajima T, et al. 42 Sojka D, Franta Z, Horn M, Caffrey CR,
jima M, Ohashi K & Onuma M. cDNA Two serine protease inhibitors (serpins) that Mares M & Kopacek P. New insights into
cloning, characterization and vaccine effect induce a bovine protective immune response the machinery of blood digestion by ticks.
analysis of Haemaphysalis longicornis against Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks. Trends Parasitol 2013; 29: 276–285.
tick saliva proteins. Vaccine 2001; 19: Vaccine 2006; 24: 2230–2237. 43 Franta Z, Sojka D, Frantova H, et al.
4287–4296. 28 Imamura S, Konnai S, Vaz Ida S, et al. IrCL1 – the haemoglobinolytic cathepsin L
14 Bishop R, Lambson B, Wells C, et al. A Effects of anti-tick cocktail vaccine against of the hard tick, Ixodes ricinus. Int J Para-
cement protein of the tick Rhipicephalus Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Jpn J Vet Res sitol 2011; 41: 1253–1262.
appendiculatus, located in the secretory e 2008; 56: 85–98. 44 Tsuji N, Miyoshi T, Battsetseg B, Matsuo
cell granules of the type III salivary gland 29 Prevot PP, Couvreur B, Denis V, Brossard T, Xuan X & Fujisaki K. A cysteine pro-
acini, induces strong antibody responses in M, Vanhamme L & Godfroid E. Protective tease is critical for Babesia spp. transmis-
cattle. Int J Parasitol 2002; 32: 833–842. immunity against Ixodes ricinus induced by sion in Haemaphysalis ticks. PLoS Pathog
15 Trimnell AR, Hails RS & Nuttall PA. Dual a salivary serpin. Vaccine 2007; 25: 2008; 4: e1000062.
action ectoparasite vaccine targeting ‘ex- 3284–3292. 45 Franta P. Experimental vaccinations of rab-
posed’ and ‘concealed’ antigens. Vaccine 30 Schwarz A, Valdes JJ & Kotsyfakis M. The bits with recombinant digestive peptidases of
2002; 20: 3560–3568. role of cystatins in tick physiology and the tick Ixodes ricinus. Master thesis (in
16 Trimnell AR, Davies GM, Lissina O, Hails blood feeding. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2012; Czech). Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of
RS & Nuttall PA. A cross-reactive tick 3: 117–127. Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 2011.
cement antigen is a candidate broad- 31 Kotsyfakis M, Anderson JM, Andersen JF, 46 Horn M, Nussbaumerova M, Sanda M,
spectrum tick vaccine. Vaccine 2005; 23: et al. Cutting edge: immunity against a “si- et al. Hemoglobin digestion in blood-feed-
4329–4341. lent” salivary antigen of the Lyme vector ing ticks: mapping a multipeptidase path-
17 Labuda M, Trimnell AR, Lickova M, et al. Ixodes scapularis impairs its ability to feed. way by functional proteomics. Chem Biol
An antivector vaccine protects against a J Immunol 2008; 181: 5209–5212. 2009; 16: 1053–1063.
lethal vector-borne pathogen. PLoS Pathog 32 Salat J, Paesen GC, Rezacova P, et al. Crys- 47 Lara FA, Lins U, Paiva-Silva G, et al. A
2006; 2: e27. tal structure and functional characterization new intracellular pathway of haem detoxifi-
18 Chmelar J, Kotal J, Karim S, et al. Sia- of an immunomodulatory salivary cystatin cation in the midgut of the cattle tick Boo-
lomes and mialomes: a systems-biology from the soft tick Ornithodoros moubata. philus microplus: aggregation inside a
view of tick tissues and tick-host interac- Biochem J 2010; 429: 103–112. specialized organelle, the hemosome. J Exp
tions. Trends Parasitol 2015; 32: 242–254. 33 Imamura S, Konnai S, Yamada S, et al. Biol 2003; 206: 1707–1715.
19 Decrem Y, Beaufays J, Blasioli V, et al. A Identification and partial characterization of 48 Braz GR, Coelho HS, Masuda H & Oli-
family of putative metalloproteases in the a gut Rhipicephalus appendiculatus cystatin. veira PL. A missing metabolic pathway in
salivary glands of the tick Ixodes ricinus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2013; 4: 138–144. the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Curr
FEBS J 2008; 275: 1485–1499. 34 Parizi LF, Githaka NW, Acevedo C, et al. Biol 1999; 9: 703–706.
20 Decrem Y, Mariller M, Lahaye K, et al. Sequence characterization and immuno- 49 Perner J, Sobotka R, Sima R, et al. Acqui-
The impact of gene knock-down and vacci- genicity of cystatins from the cattle tick sition of exogenous haem is essential for
nation against salivary metalloproteases on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Ticks tick reproduction. Elife 2016; 5: pii: e12318.
blood feeding and egg laying by Ixodes rici- Tick Borne Dis 2013; 4: 492–499. 50 Kopacek P, Zdychova J, Yoshiga T, Weise
nus. Int J Parasitol 2008; 38: 549–560. 35 Parizi LF, Sabadin GA, Alzugaray MF, C, Rudenko N & Law JH. Molecular clon-
21 Imamura S, da Silva Vaz I Jr, Konnai S, et al. Rhipicephalus microplus and Ixodes ing, expression and isolation of ferritins
et al. Effect of vaccination with a recombi- ovatus cystatins in tick blood digestion and from two tick species – Ornithodoros mou-
nant metalloprotease from Haemaphysalis evasion of host immune response. Parasit bata and Ixodes ricinus. Insect Biochem Mol
longicornis. Exp Appl Acarol 2009; 48: Vectors 2015; 8: 122. Biol 2003; 33: 103–113.
345–358. 36 Bowman AS & Sauer JR. Tick salivary 51 Hajdusek O, Sojka D, Kopacek P, et al.
22 Ali A, Parizi LF, Guizzo MG, et al. glands: function, physiology and future. Knockdown of proteins involved in iron
Immunoprotective potential of a Rhipi- Parasitology 2004; 129(Suppl): S67–S81. metabolism limits tick reproduction and
cephalus (Boophilus) microplus metallopro- 37 Ball A, Campbell EM, Jacob J, Hoppler S development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
tease. Vet Parasitol 2015; 207: 107–114. & Bowman AS. Identification, functional 2009; 106: 1033–1038.
23 Maritz-Olivier C, Stutzer C, Jongejan F, characterization and expression patterns of 52 Galay RL, Aung KM, Umemiya-Shirafuji
Neitz AWH & Gaspar ARM. Tick anti- a water-specific aquaporin in the brown R, et al. Multiple ferritins are vital to suc-
hemostatics: targets for future vaccines and dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Insect cessful blood feeding and reproduction of
therapeutics. Trends Parasitol 2007; 23: Biochem Mol Biol 2009; 39: 105–112. the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis. J
397–407. 38 Campbell EM, Ball A, Hoppler S & Bow- Exp Biol 2013; 216: 1905–1915.
24 Sugino M, Imamura S, Mulenga A, et al. man AS. Invertebrate aquaporins: a review. 53 Galay RL, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Bacolod
A serine proteinase inhibitor (serpin) from J Comp Physiol B 2008; 178: 935–955. ET, et al. Two kinds of ferritin protect ixo-
ixodid tick Haemaphysalis longicornis; clon- 39 Campbell EM, Burdin M, Hoppler S & did ticks from iron overload and conse-
ing and preliminary assessment of its suit- Bowman AS. Role of an aquaporin in the quent oxidative stress. PLoS One 2014; 9:
ability as a candidate for a tick vaccine. sheep tick Ixodes ricinus: assessment as a e90661.
Vaccine 2003; 21: 2844–2851. potential control target. Int J Parasitol 54 Hajdusek O, Almazan C, Loosova G, et al.
25 Imamura S, da Silva Vaz Junior I, Sugino 2010; 40: 15–23. Characterization of ferritin 2 for the control
M, Ohashi K & Onuma M. A serine pro- 40 Guerrero FD, Andreotti R, Bendele KG, of tick infestations. Vaccine 2010; 28:
tease inhibitor (serpin) from Haemaphysalis et al. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus 2993–2998.
longicornis as an anti-tick vaccine. Vaccine aquaporin as an effective vaccine antigen to 55 Galay RL, Miyata T, Umemiya-Shirafuji
2005; 23: 1301–1311. protect against cattle tick infestations. Para- R, et al. Evaluation and comparison of the
26 Mulenga A, Tsuda A, Onuma M & Sugi- sit Vectors 2014; 7: 475. potential of two ferritins as anti-tick vacci-
moto C. Four serine proteinase inhibitors 41 Hussein HE, Scoles GA, Ueti MW, et al. nes against Haemaphysalis longicornis. Para-
(serpin) from the brown ear tick, Targeted silencing of the Aquaporin 2 gene sit Vectors 2014; 7: 482.
56 Hajdusek O, Sima RJP, Loosova G, Har- 70 Ullmann AJ, Lima CMR, Guerrero FD, 83 Lew-Tabor AE, Kurscheid S, Barrero R,
cubova A & Kopacek P. Tick iron and Piesman J & Black WC. Genome size and et al. Gene expression evidence for off-tar-
heme metabolism – new target for an anti- organization in the blacklegged tick, Ixodes get effects caused by RNA interference-
tick intervention. Ticks Tick Borne Dis scapularis and the Southern cattle tick, mediated gene silencing of Ubiquitin-63E
2016; in press. Boophilus microplus. Insect Mol Biol 2005; in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
57 Sharp PJ, Smith DR, Bach W, Wagland 14: 217–222. Int J Parasitol 2011; 41: 1001–1014.
BM & Cobon GS. Purified glutathione S- 71 Gulia-Nuss M, Nuss AB, Meyer JM, et al. 84 Ma Y, Creanga A, Lum L & Beachy PA.
transferases from parasites as candidate Genomic insights into the Ixodes scapularis Prevalence of off-target effects in Droso-
protective antigens. Int J Parasitol 1991; 21: tick vector of Lyme disease. Nat Commun phila RNA interference screens. Nature
839–846. 2016; 7: 10507. 2006; 443: 359–363.
58 Zhan B, Liu S, Perally S, et al. Biochemical 72 Guerrero FD, Moolhuijzen P, Peterson 85 Kurscheid S, Lew-Tabor AE, Bruyeres A,
characterization and vaccine potential of a DG, et al. Reassociation kinetics-based et al. Evidence of a tick RNAi pathway by
heme-binding glutathione transferase from approach for partial genome sequencing of comparative genomics and reverse genetics
the adult hookworm Ancylostoma caninum. the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) mi- screen of targets with known loss-of-func-
Infect Immun 2005; 73: 6903–6911. croplus. BMC Genom 2010; 11: 374. tion phenotypes in Drosophila. BMC Mol
59 Parizi LF, Utiumi KU, Imamura S, et al. 73 McCooke JK, Guerrero FD, Barrero RA, Biol 2009; 10: 26.
Cross immunity with Haemaphysalis longi- et al. The mitochondrial genome of a Texas 86 Wang M, Guerrero FD, Pertea G & Nene
cornis glutathione S-transferase reduces an outbreak strain of the cattle tick, Rhipi- VM. Global comparative analysis of ESTs
experimental Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) mi- cephalus (Boophilus) microplus, derived from from the southern cattle tick, Rhipicephalus
croplus infestation. Exp Parasitol 2011; 127: whole genome sequencing Pacific Bio- (Boophilus) microplus. BMC Genom 2007;
113–118. sciences and Illumina reads. Gene 2015; 8: 368–382.
60 Weiss BL & Kaufman WR. Two feeding- 571: 135–141. 87 Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology. Curr
induced proteins from the male gonad trig- 74 Bellgard MI, Moolhuijzen PM, Guerrero Opin Microbiol 2000; 3: 445–450.
ger engorgement of the female tick Ambly- FD, et al. CattleTickBase: an integrated 88 Vernikos G & Medini D. Bexsero(R)
omma hebraeum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A internet-based bioinformatics resource for chronicle. Pathog Glob Health 2014; 108:
2004; 101: 5874–5879. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Int J 305–316.
61 Yamada S, Konnai S, Imamura S, Ito T, Parasitol 2012; 42: 161–169. 89 Hughes AL & Friedman R. Distinctive
Onuma M & Ohashi K. Cloning and char- 75 Moolhuijzen PM, Lew-Tabor AE, Morgan amino acid composition profiles in salivary
acterization of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus JA, et al. The complexity of Rhipicephalus proteins of the tick Ixodes scapularis. Ticks
voraxinalpha and its effect as anti-tick vac- (Boophilus) microplus genome characterised Tick Borne Dis 2011; 2: 219–224.
cine. Vaccine 2009; 27: 5989–5997. through detailed analysis of two BAC 90 Lewis LA, Radulovic ZM, Kim TK, Porter
62 Logullo C, Vaz Ida S, Sorgine MH, et al. clones. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4: 254. LM & Mulenga A. Identification of 24h
Isolation of an aspartic proteinase precur- 76 Cramaro WJ, Revets D, Hunewald OE, Sin- Ixodes scapularis immunogenic tick saliva
sor from the egg of a hard tick, Boophilus ner R, Reye AL & Muller CP. Integration proteins. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2015; 6:
microplus. Parasitology 1998; 116(Pt 6): of Ixodes ricinus genome sequencing with 424–434.
525–532. transcriptome and proteome annotation of 91 Diaz-Martin V, Manzano-Roman R,
63 Sorgine MH, Logullo C, Zingali RB, Paiva- the naive midgut. BMC Genom 2015; 16: Obolo-Mvoulouga P, Oleaga A & Perez-
Silva GO, Juliano L & Oliveira PL. A 871. Sanchez R. Development of vaccines
heme-binding aspartic proteinase from the 77 Saldivar L, Guerrero FD, Miller RJ, Ben- against Ornithodoros soft ticks: an update.
eggs of the hard tick Boophilus microplus. J dele KG, Gondro C & Brayton KA. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2015; 6: 211–220.
Biol Chem 2000; 275: 28659–28665. Microarray analysis of acaricide-inducible 92 Burger TD, Shao R & Barker SC. Phyloge-
64 Seixas A, Dos Santos PC, Velloso FF, et al. gene expression in the southern cattle tick, netic analysis of mitochondrial genome
A Boophilus microplus vitellin-degrading Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Insect sequences indicates that the cattle tick,
cysteine endopeptidase. Parasitology 2003; Mol Biol 2008; 17: 597–606. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, con-
126: 155–163. 78 Aljamali MN, Ramakrishnan VG, Weng H, tains a cryptic species. Mol Phylogenet Evol
65 da Silva Vaz I Jr, Logullo C, Sorgine M, Tucker JS, Sauer JR & Essenberg RC. 2014; 76: 241–253.
et al. Immunization of bovines with an Microarray analysis of gene expression 93 Bock R, Johnson L, de Vos A & Jorgensen
aspartic proteinase precursor isolated from changes in feeding female and male lone W. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 2004;
Boophilus microplus eggs. Vet Immunol star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (L). 129: S247–S269.
Immunopathol 1998; 66: 331–341. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2009; 71: 94 de la Fuente J, Ayoubi P, Blouin EF, Alma-
66 Leal AT, Seixas A, Pohl PC, et al. Vaccina- 236–253. zan C, Naranjo V & Kocan KM. Anaplas-
tion of bovines with recombinant Boophilus 79 Hardy S, Legagneux V, Audic Y & Paillard mosis: focusing on host-vector-pathogen
Yolk pro-Cathepsin. Vet Immunol Immuno- L. Reverse genetics in eukaryotes. Biol Cell interactions for vaccine development. Ann
pathol 2006; 114: 341–345. 2010; 102: 561–580. N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1078: 416–423.
67 Seixas A, Oliveira P, Termignoni C, Logullo 80 Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas 95 Lew-Tabor AE, Moolhuijzen PM, Vance
C, Masuda A & da Silva Vaz I Jr. Rhipi- SA, Driver SE & Mello CC. Potent and ME, et al. Suppressive subtractive
cephalus (Boophilus) microplus embryo pro- specific genetic interference by double- hybridization analysis of Rhipicephalus
teins as target for tick vaccine. Vet Immunol stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. (Boophilus) microplus larval and adult
Immunopathol 2012; 148: 149–156. Nature 1998; 391: 806–811. transcript expression during attachment
68 Seixas A, Leal AT, Nascimento-Silva MC, 81 Gibson A, Smith Z, Fuqua C, Clay K & and feeding. Vet Parasitol 2010; 167:
Masuda A, Termignoni C & da Silva Vaz I Colbourne J. Why so many unknown 304–320.
Jr. Vaccine potential of a tick vitellin- genes? Partitioning orphans from a repre- 96 Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, et al. The
degrading enzyme (VTDCE). Vet Immunol sentative transcriptome of the lone star tick Pfam protein families database. Nucleic
Immunopathol 2008; 124: 332–340. Amblyomma americanum. BMC Genom Acids Res 2002; 30: 276–280.
69 Parizi LF, Reck J Jr, Oldiges DP, et al. 2013; 14: 135. 97 Lew-Tabor AE, Rodriguez Valle M, Mool-
Multi-antigenic vaccine against the cattle 82 Aljamali MN, Sauer JR & Essenberg RC. huijzen PM, Bruyeres A & Bellgard M. In
tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: RNA interference: applicability in tick XII International Congress of Parasitology
a field evaluation. Vaccine 2012; 30: research. Exp Appl Acarol 2002; 28: ICOPA, Melbourne, Australia: Medimond
6912–6917. 89–96. International Proceedings; 2010: 97–102.
98 Larsen JE, Lund O & Nielsen M. Improved of infectious Anaplasma phagocytophilum 125 Mans BJ & Neitz AW. Adaptation of ticks
method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes. during transmission from ticks to mice. J to a blood-feeding environment: evolution
Immunome Res 2006; 2: 2. Bacteriol 2012; 194: 2238–2247. from a functional perspective. Insect
99 Lew-Tabor AE, Bruyeres AG, Zhang B & 113 Ayllon N, Naranjo V, Hajdusek O, et al. Biochem Mol Biol 2004; 34: 1–17.
Rodriguez Valle M. Rhipicephalus (Boophi- Nuclease Tudor-SN is involved in tick 126 Mans BJ, Andersen JF, Francischetti IM,
lus) microplus tick in vitro feeding methods dsRNA-mediated RNA interference and et al. Comparative sialomics between hard
for functional (dsRNA) and vaccine candi- feeding but not in defense against flavivi- and soft ticks: implications for the evolu-
date (antibody) screening. Ticks Tick Borne ral or Anaplasma phagocytophilum rick- tion of blood-feeding behavior. Insect Bio-
Dis 2014; 5: 500–510. ettsial infection. PLoS One 2015; 10: chem Mol Biol 2008; 38: 42–58.
100 Guerrero FD, Miller RJ & Perez de Leon e0133038. 127 Mans BJ & Neitz AW. Exon-intron struc-
AA. Cattle tick vaccines: many candidate 114 Ayllon N, Villar M, Galindo RC, et al. ture of outlier tick lipocalins indicate a
antigens, but will a commercially viable Systems biology of tissue-specific response monophyletic origin within the larger lipo-
product emerge? Int J Parasitol 2012; 42: to Anaplasma phagocytophilum reveals dif- calin family. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2004;
421–427. ferentiated apoptosis in the tick vector 34: 585–594.
101 Maritz-Olivier C, van Zyl W & Stutzer C. Ixodes scapularis. PLoS Genet 2015; 11: 128 Kondrashov FA. Gene duplication as a
A systematic, functional genomics, and e1005120. mechanism of genomic adaptation to a
reverse vaccinology approach to the identi- 115 Villar M, Ayllon N, Alberdi P, et al. Inte- changing environment. Proc Biol Sci 2012;
fication of vaccine candidates in the cattle grated metabolomics, transcriptomics and 279: 5048–5057.
tick, Rhipicephalus microplus. Ticks Tick proteomics identifies metabolic pathways 129 Zambrano-Villa S, Rosales-Borjas D, Car-
Borne Dis 2012; 3: 179–187. affected by Anaplasma phagocytophilum rero JC & Ortiz-Ortiz L. How protozoan
102 He Y & Xiang Z. Databases and in silico infection in tick cells. Mol Cell Proteomics parasites evade the immune response.
tools for vaccine design. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 14: 3154–3172. Trends Parasitol 2002; 18: 272–278.
2013; 993: 115–127. 116 Villar M, Ayllon N, Kocan KM, et al. 130 Fares MA. Survival and innovation: the
103 Ghate AD, Bhagwat BU, Bhosle SG, Identification and characterization of Ana- role of mutational robustness in evolution.
Gatepa II & Kulkarni-Kale UD. Character- plasma phagocytophilum proteins involved Biochimie 2015; 119: 254–261.
ization of antibody-binding sites on pro- in infection of the tick vector, Ixodes scapu- 131 Louw E, van der Merwe NA, Neitz AW &
teins: development of a knowledgebase and laris. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0137237. Maritz-Olivier C. Evolution of the tissue fac-
its applications in improving epitope predic- 117 Zivkovic Z, Esteves E, Almazan C, et al. tor pathway inhibitor-like Kunitz domain-
tions. Protein Pept Lett 2007; 14: 531–535. Differential expression of genes in salivary containing protein family in Rhipicephalus
104 Flower DR, Macdonald IK, Ramakrishnan glands of male Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Int J Parasitol 2013; 43: 81–94.
K, Davies MN & Doytchinova IA. Com- microplus in response to infection with Ana- 132 Schwarz A, Cabezas-Cruz A, Kopecky J &
puter aided selection of candidate vaccine plasma marginale. BMC Genom 2010; 11: Valdes JJ. Understanding the evolutionary
antigens. Immunome Res 2010; 6(Suppl 2): 186. structural variability and target specificity
S1. 118 Antunes S, Galindo RC, Almazan C, et al. of tick salivary Kunitz peptides using next
105 Tomar N & De RK. Immunoinformatics: a Functional genomics studies of Rhipi- generation transcriptome data. BMC Evol
brief review. Methods Mol Biol 2014; 1184: cephalus (Boophilus) annulatus ticks in Biol 2014; 14: 4.
23–55. response to infection with the cattle proto- 133 Feyereisen R, Dermauw W & Van Leeuwen
106 Donati C & Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinol- zoan parasite, Babesia bigemina. Int J Para- T. Genotype to phenotype, the molecular
ogy in the 21st century: improvements over sitol 2012; 42: 187–195. and physiological dimensions of resistance
the original design. Ann N Y Acad Sci 119 Merino O, Alberdi P, Perez de la Lastra in arthropods. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2015;
2013; 1285: 115–132. JM & de la Fuente J. Tick vaccines and the 121: 61–77.
107 de la Fuente J & Merino O. Vaccinomics, control of tick-borne pathogens. Front Cell 134 Kaewmongkol S, Kaewmongkol G, Inthong
the new road to tick vaccines. Vaccine 2013; Infect Microbiol 2013; 3: 30. N, et al. Variation among Bm86 sequences
31: 5923–5929. 120 Almazan C, Kocan KM, Bergman DK, in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks
108 Contreras M, Villar M, Alberdi P & dela Garcia-Garcia JC, Blouin EF & de la collected from cattle across Thailand. Exp
Fuente J. Methods in Molecular Biology, Fuente J. Identification of protective anti- Appl Acarol 2015; 66: 247–256.
Vaccinomics approach to tick vaccine devel- gens for the control of Ixodes scapularis 135 Coumou J, Wagemakers A, Trentelman JJ,
opment. In Thomas S (ed.): Vaccine Design: infestations using cDNA expression library Nijhof AM & Hovius JW. Vaccination
Methods and Protocols, Volume 2: Vaccines immunization. Vaccine 2003; 21: 1492–1501. against Bm86 homologues in rabbits does
for Veterinary Diseases Springer; 2016: 121 de la Fuente J, Maritz-Olivier C, Naranjo not impair Ixodes ricinus feeding or ovipo-
1404: 275–286 in press. V, et al. Evidence of the role of tick sub- sition. PLoS One 2014; 10: e0123495.
109 Oberg AL, McKinney BA, Schaid DJ, olesin in gene expression. BMC Genom 136 Kumar B, Murugan K, Ray DD & Ghosh
Pankratz VS, Kennedy RB & Poland GA. 2008; 9: 372. S. Efficacy of rBm86 against Rhipicephalus
Lessons learned in the analysis of high- 122 Naranjo V, Ayllon N, Perez de la Lastra (Boophilus) microplus (IVRI-I line) and
dimensional data in vaccinomics. Vaccine JM, et al. Reciprocal regulation of NF-kB Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (IVRI-II
2015; 33: 5262–5270. (Relish) and Subolesin in the tick vector, line) infestations on bovine calves. Parasitol
110 Severo MS, Pedra JHF, Ayll on N, Kocan Ixodes scapularis. PLoS One 2013; 8: Res 2012; 111: 629–635.
KM & de La Fuente J. Anaplasma. In e65915. 137 Vargas M, Montero C, Sanchez D, et al.
Tang Y-W, Sussman M, Liu D, Poxton I, 123 Antunes S, Merino O, Mosqueda J, et al. Two initial vaccinations with the Bm86-
Schwartzman J (eds): Molecular Medical Tick capillary feeding for the study of pro- based Gavacplus vaccine against Rhipi-
Microbiology (2nd edition). Elsevier, Aca- teins involved in tick-pathogen interactions cephalus (Boophilus) microplus induce simi-
demic Press, 2015: 2033–2042. as potential antigens for the control of tick lar reproductive suppression to three initial
111 de la Fuente J, Estrada-Pe~ na A, Cabezas- infestation and pathogen infection. Parasit vaccinations under production conditions.
Cruz A & Kocan KM. Anaplasma phagocy- Vectors 2014; 7: 42. BMC Vet Res 2010; 6: 43.
tophilum uses common strategies for 124 Merino O, Antunes S, Mosqueda J, et al. 138 Freeman JM, Davey RB, Kappmeyer LS,
infection of ticks and vertebrate hosts. Trends Vaccination with proteins involved in tick- Kammlah DM & Olafson PU. Bm86 mid-
Microbiol 2016; 24: 173–180 in press. pathogen interactions reduces vector infes- gut protein sequence variation in South
112 Mastronunzio JE, Kurscheid S & Fikrig E. tations and pathogen infection. Vaccine Texas cattle fever ticks. Parasit Vectors
Postgenomic analyses reveal development 2013; 31: 5889–5896. 2010; 3: 101.
139 Canales M, Almazan C, Naranjo V, Jonge- indices of complex networks: theoretical transmission to naive hosts. Microbes Infect
jan F & de la Fuente J. Vaccination with backgrounds, applications, and legal issues. 2013; 15: 729–737.
recombinant Boophilus annulatus Bm86 Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2737–2764. 163 Nourani E, Khunjush F & Durmus S.
ortholog protein, Ba86, protects cattle 152 Peconick AP, Sossai S, Girao FA, et al. Computational approaches for prediction
against B. annulatus and B. microplus infes- Synthetic vaccine (SBm7462) against the of pathogen-host protein–protein interac-
tations. BMC Biotechnol 2009; 9: 29. cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) mi- tions. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 94.
140 Richards SA, Stutzer C, Bosman AM & croplus: preservation of immunogenic deter- 164 Durmus Tekir S, Cakir T & Ulgen KO.
Maritz-Olivier C. Transmembrane proteins minants in different strains from South Infection strategies of bacterial and viral
– mining the cattle tick transcriptome. America. Exp Parasitol 2008; 119: 37–43. pathogens through pathogen-human pro-
Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2015; 6: 695–710. 153 Odongo D, Kamau L, Skilton R, et al. tein–protein interactions. Front Microbiol
141 Ottman C. Protein–protein interactions: an Vaccination of cattle with TickGARD 2012; 3: 46.
overview. In Mannhold R, Kubinyi H, induces cross-reactive antibodies binding to 165 Durmus Tekir SD & Ulgen KO. Systems
Folkers G (eds): Protein–Protein Interac- conserved linear peptides of Bm86 homo- biology of pathogen-host interaction: net-
tions in Drug Discovery. Singapore, Wiley- logues in Boophilus decoloratus. Vaccine works of protein–protein interaction within
VCH Verlag GmbH & Co; 2013: 1–19. 2007; 25: 1287–1296. pathogens and pathogen-human interac-
142 Hostetler JB, Sharma S, Bartholdson SJ, 154 Kopp N, Diaz D, Amacker M, et al. Identi- tions in the post-genomic era. Biotechnol J
Wright GJ, Fairhurst RM & Rayner JC. A fication of a synthetic peptide inducing 2013; 8: 85–96.
library of Plasmodium vivax recombinant cross-reactive antibodies binding to Rhipi- 166 Durmus S, Cakir T, Ozgur A & Guthke R.
merozoite proteins reveals new vaccine can- cephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Rhipi- A review on computational systems biology
didates and protein–protein interactions. cephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Hyalomma of pathogen-host interactions. Front Micro-
PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9: e0004264. anatolicum anatolicum and Rhipicephalus biol 2015; 6: 235.
143 Tyagi N, Swapna LS, Mohanty S, et al. appendiculatus BM86 homologues. Vaccine 167 van Zyl WA, Stutzer C, Olivier NA & Mar-
Evolutionary divergence of Plasmodium fal- 2009; 28: 261–269. itz-Olivier C. Comparative microarray anal-
ciparum: sequences, protein–protein interac- 155 Kamau L, Skilton RA, Odongo DO, et al. yses of adult female midgut tissues from
tions, pathways and processes. Infect Disord Differential transcription of two highly feeding Rhipicephalus species. Ticks Tick
Drug Targets 2009; 9: 257–271. divergent gut-expressed Bm86 antigen gene Borne Dis 2015; 6: 84–90.
144 Pierrot C, Freville A, Olivier C, Souplet V homologues in the tick Rhipicephalus 168 Garcia GR, Gardinassi LG, Ribeiro JM,
& Khalife J. Inhibition of protein–protein appendiculatus (Acari: Ixodida). Insect Mol et al. The sialotranscriptome of Ambly-
interactions in Plasmodium falciparum: Biol 2011; 20: 105–114. omma triste, Amblyomma parvum and
future drug targets. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 156 Assumpcao TC, Ma D, Mizurini DM, Amblyomma cajennense ticks, uncovered by
18: 3522–3530. et al. In vitro mode of action and anti- 454-based RNA-seq. Parasit Vectors 2014;
145 Ramaprasad A, Pain A & Ravasi T. Defin- thrombotic activity of Boophilin, a multi- 7: 430.
ing the protein interaction network of functional Kunitz protease inhibitor from 169 Mudenda L, Pierle SA, Turse JE, et al.
human malaria parasite Plasmodium falci- the midgut of a tick vector of babesiosis, Proteomics informed by transcriptomics
parum. Genomics 2012; 99: 69–75. Rhipicephalus microplus. PLoS Negl Trop identifies novel secreted proteins in Derma-
146 Ramakrishnan G, Chandra NR & Srini- Dis 2016; 10: e0004298. centor andersoni saliva. Int J Parasitol 2014;
vasan N. From workstations to work- 157 Macedo-Ribeiro S, Almeida C, Calisto BM, 44: 1029–1037.
benches: towards predicting et al. Isolation, cloning and structural char- 170 Xu XL, Cheng TY, Yang H, Yan F & Yang
physicochemically viable protein–protein acterisation of boophilin, a multifunctional Y. De novo sequencing, assembly and anal-
interactions across a host and a pathogen. Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor from the ysis of salivary gland transcriptome of
IUBMB Life 2014; 66: 759–774. cattle tick. PLoS One 2008; 3: e1624. Haemaphysalis flava and identification of
147 Ramakrishnan G, Srinivasan N, Padma- 158 Yang X, Promnares K, Qin J, et al. Charac- sialoprotein genes. Infect Genet Evol 2015;
priya P & Natarajan V. Homology-based terization of multiprotein complexes of the 32: 135–142.
prediction of potential protein–protein Borrelia burgdorferi outer membrane vesi- 171 Kotsyfakis M, Kopacek P, Franta Z, Pedra
interactions between human erythrocytes cles. J Proteome Res 2011; 10: 4556–4566. JH & Ribeiro JM. Deep sequencing analy-
and Plasmodium falciparum. Bioinform Biol 159 Kariu T, Sharma K, Singh P, et al. BB0323 sis of the Ixodes ricinus haemocytome.
Insights 2015; 9: 195–206. and novel virulence determinant BB0238: PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9: e0003754.
148 Rapanoel HA, Mazandu GK & Mulder Borrelia burgdorferi proteins that interact 172 Kotsyfakis M, Schwarz A, Erhart J &
NJ. Predicting and analyzing interactions with and stabilize each other and are criti- Ribeiro JM. Tissue- and time-dependent
between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its cal for infectivity. J Infect Dis 2015; 211: transcription in Ixodes ricinus salivary
human host. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67472. 462–471. glands and midguts when blood feeding on
149 Mulder NJ, Akinola RO, Mazandu GK & 160 Pulzova L, Kovac A, Mucha R, et al. the vertebrate host. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 9103.
Rapanoel H. Using biological networks to OspA-CD40 dyad: ligand-receptor interac- 173 Consortium GRD, Contreras M, de la
improve our understanding of infectious tion in the translocation of neuroinvasive Fuente J, Estrada-Pena A, Grubhoffer L &
diseases. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2014; Borrelia across the blood-brain barrier. Sci Tobes R. Genomic resources notes accepted
11: 1–10. Rep 2011; 1: 86. 1 April 2014 – 31 May 2014. Mol Ecol
150 Figueras MJ, Echeverria PC & Angel SO. 161 Groshong AM, Fortune DE, Moore BP, Resour 2014; 14: 1095.
Protozoan HSP90-heterocomplex: molecu- et al. BB0238, a presumed tetratricopeptide 174 Yu X, Gong H, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Cao J
lar interaction network and biological sig- repeat-containing protein, is required dur- & Zhou J. Differential sialotranscriptomes
nificance. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2014; 15: ing Borrelia burgdorferi mammalian infec- of unfed and fed Rhipicephalus haema-
245–255. tion. Infect Immun 2014; 82: 4292–4306. physaloides, with particular regard to differ-
151 Gonzalez-Diaz H, Romaris F, Duardo-San- 162 Yang X, Hegde S, Shroder DY, et al. The entially expressed genes of cysteine
chez A, et al. Predicting drugs and proteins lipoprotein La7 contributes to Borrelia proteases. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8: 597.
in parasite infections with topological burgdorferi persistence in ticks and their