GOV. ALFONSO D.

TAN COLLEGE
INSTITUTE OF MIDWIFERY

A COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON COMMUNITY ORGANIZING

PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH (COPAR)

GROUP 4

PUROK-4 BRGY. MAQUILAO, TANGUB CITY

OCTOBER 7, 2022- MAY 26, 2023

Cristely C. Maca, RM
Jemelyn L. Dapar, RM
Maria Luisa P. Antipolo, RN
INSTRUCTORS
 CHAPTER I
Introduction

This Chapter presents the Community profile of Brgy. Maquilao, Tangub City. It
includes how the Brgy. Maquilao history started, its physical description, the summary graph
interpretation and its computation score justification, and lastly the methodologies used.

Introduction to COPAR
A community is a group of people who share common interests, characteristics, or goals
and interact with each other regularly. According to Merriam-Webster, a community is “a
unified body of individuals” who live in a certain area, have a common culture or interest, or
share a particular characteristic. Communities can be found in many different settings, such as
neighborhoods, social groups, online forums, and professional organizations. They provide a
sense of belonging, social support, and shared purpose to their members.
According to a study published in the journal Social Science and Medicine, communities
can play a crucial role in promoting health, well-being, and social connectedness among their
members (Kawachi et al., 2015). In addition to providing social support, communities can also
offer opportunities for learning, personal growth, and collective action. Overall, communities are
an important part of human society, helping to foster a sense of belonging and collective
purpose.
COPAR stands for Community Organizing Participatory Action Research is defined as a
continuous and sustained process of educating, organizing, and mobilizing people through
community participation, action and research. It is a technique used to empower people and
develop communities by assisting them in creating and managing successful organizations,
mobilizing community resources for health care, and making sure they are well-equipped to deal
with and resolve their community’s problem on their own (Hope, 2020).
COPAR is an important tool for community development and people empowerment as
this helps community workers to generate community participation in development activities. In
addition, it prepares people/clients to eventually take over the management of a development
programs in the future. It also maximizes community participation and involvement; community
resources are mobilized for community services (Vera, 2013). It also aims to empower
marginalized communities by giving them the opportunity to engage in the research process
where they play an active role as participants (Jimenez, 2008).

Brief History of the Barangay

 Maquilao is a barangay located in Tangub City, Misamis Occidental, in the Philippines. It
is situated in the southeastern part of the city, The name Maquilao is believed to have originated
from the Cebuano word “makilaw” , which means sour or tart. The barangay was named after a
type of fruit that was abundant in the area, which was known for its tart and sour taste.
Maquilao has a rich history that dates back to the pre-colonial period. The area was once
inhabited by the Subanen people, who were the original inhabitants of the area before the arrival
of the Spanish colonizers. During World War II, the barangay was heavily damaged by the
Japanese forces, but it was later rebuilt and developed. Over time, Maquilao became a thriving
agricultural community, with rice, corn, and vegetables being the primary crops.
Today, Maquilao is a bustling barangay with a vibrant community and a strong economy.
The barangay is home to several small businesses and enterprises, including sari-sari stores,
bakeries, and poultry farms.

Barangay Organizational Structure

Brgy. Captain

Brgy. Secretary Brgy. Councilors Brgy. Treasurer

& SK Chairman

Brgy. Health
Workers
Committee on
Peace and Order

Methodologies
In order to gather data, the group conducted an interviews among the residents in Purok 4
Maquilao, Tangub City along with some questionnaires. Following that, these data were
compiled and used to determine the community’s demographic, socio-economic, environmental
profile, and health status of each residents.

CHAPTER II
 Presentation of Data

A. SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

1.3 AGE
1.3 Age
AGE NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
0-11 mos. 2 3.76% 1.16% 0.58% 0.58% 6.94% 0-11mos.
1-3yrs 24 2.02% 1-3yrs
4-5yrs
4-5yrs 7 6-12yrs
24.57% 15.03%
6-12yrs 52 13-20yrs
21-40yrs
13-20yrs 53 41-65yrs
21-40yrs 104 66-75yrs
76-85yrs
41-65yrs 85 15.30% 86-100yrs
66-75yrs 13
76-85yrs 4 30.06%
86-100yrs 2
>100yrs 0
TOTAL: 347

The pie chart concludes that the age range of the majority of the respondents in
purok 4 is between 21-40 years old with 104 respondents that is equivalent to 30.06%,
followed by ages 41-65 years old with 85 respondents or a total of 24.57%. The 15.30%
shown in the chart are 13-20 years old with corresponding 53 respondents, followed by the
ages 6-12 years old or 52 respondents that is equivalent to 15.03%. 6.94% or a total of 24
out of 347 respondents ages 1-3 years old. There are 13 respondents ages between 66-75
years old that is equivalent to 3.76% while there are 4 respondents that ages 76-85 years
old or a total of 1.16%. 7 respondents that ages 4-5 years old that is equivalent to 2.02%.
There are 2 respondents that ages 86-100 years old or equivalent to 0.58% same percentage
of the ages 0-11 months old while none of the respondents are above 100 years old.

1.4 GENDER:
GENDER
GENDER
Male 171

Female 176 Male

Female
49%
TOTAL 347 respondents 51%

The graph shows that 51% are female with

the total respondents of 176, while the 49% of the
respondents are 171 male respondents. This emphasizes that most of the respondents in
Purok 4 are females.

1.5 CIVIL STATUS:

CIVIL STATUS
CIVIL STATUS
Single 178
1% 9%
Married 127 2%

Widow/er 6
Single
Separated 4 Married
Widow/er
Live-in Partner 32 51% Separated
Live-in Partner
Others 0 37%
TOTAL: 347 respondents

As shown in the chart, 51% are single that

equivalent to 178 respondents, this is both male and
female. 37% are married with 127 respondents in total, 9% are live-in partner with a total
respondents of 32, 6 respondents are widow that is 2% in the chart, and the 1% of the
chart or the 4 respondents left are separated.

1.6 RELIGION:

RELIGION RELIGION
RC 204
21%
IFI 6
INC 4 RC
IFI
Jehova’s 0 INC
Assembly
Orthodox 0 Others
17% 59%
Assembly 59
UCCP 0
Others: 74 1%
2%
TOTAL: 347 respondents

As shown in the chart above, 204 out of 347 respondents are Roman Catholic, this is
the major religion in Purok 4 that is equivalent to 59%, followed by other religions namely;
the Baptist, Pentecostal, Glory to God, and Born Again religion that has 74 respondents or
a total of 21%. The 17% in the chart or 59 respondents are Assembly of God. The 2% in
the pie chart is the IFI religion with 6 respondents while the 1% left is the INC religion that
has 4 respondents.

1.7 BARANGAY ADDRESS BARANGAY ADDRESS

ll respondents interviewed were from Puork 4.

Purok 4

100%

1.8 PLACE OF ORIGIN

PLACE OF ORIGIN
PLACE OF ORIGIN

2%

Migrant 6
Migrant
Native

Native 341
98%

TOTAL: 347 respondents

The chart indicates that majority of the people living in Purok 4 are native or have
lived there since birth, which composes 341 respondents out of 347 or equivalent to 98%
while the remaining 2% or a total of 6 are the respondents who are migrant.
1.9 LENGTH OF STAY IN THE COMMUNITY

LENGTH OF STAY IN THE COMMUNITY 1.9 Length of Stay in the Community

0.6%
1.4%
6.6%
<1yr 2
13.3%

1-3 yrs 23 <1yr

1-3 yrs
4-5 yrs
4-5 yrs 5 6-10 yrs
>10 yrs

6-10 yrs 46

>10 yrs 271 78.1%

TOTAL: 347 respondents

The chart above indicates that there are 271 respondents who lived in Purok 4 for more
than 10 years already which covers up the 78.1% of the chart, followed by 46 respondents
who have lived in Maquilao for 6-10 years or a total of 13.3% , there are 23 respondents
who lived in Maquilao for 1-3 years or 6.6% of the respondents as shown in the chart while
there are 5 respondents that is equivalent to 1.4% who lived in Maquilao for 4-5yrs. There
are 2 respondents or a total of 0.6% who lived for less than a year in Maquilao.

1.10 TYPE OF FAMILY:

TYPE OF FAMILY 1.10 Type of Family

1% 1%
As
Nuclear 44

Extended 29
39% Nuclear
Single parent 1 Extended
Single-parent
Blended
Cohabiting 0
59%

Blended 1

Others: 0

TOTAL: 75 households

seen in the chart, the blue colored pie that indicates 59% are the 44 households that are
nuclear families. The 39% pie in the chart are those extended families or a total of 29
households. There is only 1 household that consist of a single parent and 1 blended family.

B. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE
1.1 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT:

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
No Formal Schooling 28
Preschool 4 No Formal Schooling
Preschool
Elem. Level 84 Elem. Level
12% 1% 8% 1% Elem. Grad.
Elem. Graduate 18 Hs Level
13% 24% HS Graduate
High School Level 83 College Level
College Graduate
11%
High School Graduate 38 5% Vocational

24%
College Level 46
College Graduate 43
Post Graduate 0
Vocational 3
TOTAL: 347 respondents

The chart revealed that there are 28 respondents who have no formal schooling yet,
it covers up 8% of the chart. There are 4 individuals who are preschoolers, equal to 1% in
the chart. There are 84 respondents who are elementary levels, covers the 24% in the chart.
The 5% pie in the chart are the respondents who were elementary graduates. The sky blue
pie in the chart are those 83 individuals who are high school levels, or a total of 24%. There
were 38 respondents who were high school graduates or a total of 11%. 46 respondents are
college levels with total of 13%, same percentage with college graduates that consist of 43
respondents and 3 respondents for vocational education.

1.2 LITERACY RATE:

LITERACY RATE
LITERACY RATE

Illiterate 53 15%
24%
Illiterate
Literate 111 Literate
Functionally Literate 1
Functionally Literate 2
32%
Functionally Literate 1 99
29%

Functionally Literate 2 84

TOTAL: 347 respondents

 The pie chart above indicates that there are 53 respondents out of 347
respondents that is equivalent to 15% are illiterate, 111 respondents are literate and is
equivalent to 32%. There are 99 respondents who are functionally literate 1, equivalent to
29% and 84 respondents are functionally literate 2 that is equivalent to 24%.

1.3 OCCUPATION

OCCUPATION OCCUPATION
7%
Government 24
8%

Private 28 34% Government

Private
Self-employed
Self-employed 53 15%
Student
None

Student 125

None 117

TOTAL: 347 respondents 36%

As the result shown in the chart, most of the respondents were students, a
total of 125 that is equal to 36%. There are 117 respondents, a total of 34% that had no
occupation, leading them to financial unstable, and this is one of the major problems in
purok 4. Almost half of the non-working respondents are the self-employed respondents,
there are 53 of them that is equivalent to 15% while the 28 respondents that is equivalent to
8% are the respondents that worked under private sector.

1.4 MONTHLY INCOME:

MONTHLY INCOME MONTHLY INCOME

Below Php 3,000 27

8%
Php 4,000 – 6,000 42 Below Php 3, 000
Php 4,000 - 6,000
12% Php 7,000 - 9,000
2%
Php 7,000 – 9,000 8 37%
Php 10,000 - 15,000
Php 16,000 onwards
4% none
Php 10, 000 – 15,000 14 dependent
5%

Php 16, 000 onwards 17 32%

None 112
Dependent 127

TOTAL: 347 respondents

In this chart, we can see that there are 127 dependents, majority of the respondents
who are dependent are students, since they have no income yet, they are dependent to their
parents that comprises 37% of the total respondents interviewed. There are 112
respondents who have no income that is equivalent to 32%. The 27 respondents have
monthly income of below 3,000php, this is the 8% part of the pie chart, while the 42
respondents have monthly income of 4,000-6,000php that is equivalent to 12%. There are 8
respondents who have income of 7,000-9,000php monthly or a total of 2%. 14 respondents
have 10k-15kphp income per month. The 17 respondents remaining have monthly income
of 16,000php.

HOUSEHOLD ASSESMENT

1.5 HOUSEHOLD MONTHLY EXPENDITURE:

HOUSEHOLD MONTHLY HOUSEHOLD MONTHLY EXPENDITURE

EXPENDITURE

Below Php 3, 000 26

Below 3, 000
Php 4,000 – 6,000 19 24% Php 4,000 - 6,000
35% Php 7,000 - 9,000
Php 10,000 onwards
Php 7,000 – 9,000 12
16%

Php 10, 000 onwards 18 25%

TOTAL: 75 households

In this chart, results are reflected through the previous chart. It is expected
that below 3,000php is the majority household monthly expenditure since majority of the
respondents had low income, dependent and even have no occupation. There are 26
households that expense below 3kphp per month, a total of 35%, followed by 19 households
that expense 4k-6kphp per month, equivalent to 25%. There are 18 households that
expense for 10kphp and above, equivalent to 24%.
1.6 HOUSING CONDITION

1.6.1 HOUSING OWNERSHIP

HOUSING OWNERSHIP
HOUSING OWNERSHIP

Owned 72 1%

3%
Rented 1
Owned
Rented
Tenant 2 Tenant

Squatter 0 96%

TOTAL: 75 households

As seen above, there are 75 households that have owned house that almost
covers up the pie chart, the result is equivalent to 96%, 2 tenants, equivalent to 3% and the
1 household is rented (1%), total of 75 households.

1.6.2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

Concrete 20

27%
Semi-concrete 25
40%
Concrete Semi-concrete
Light Materials
Light Materials 30
33%
TOTAL: 75 households

Out of 75 households, 30 of it are

AREA OF THE HOUSE
composed of light materials (40%), followed by
25 semi-concrete houses (33%), and 20 concrete
houses (27%). 20%
12%
10sqm and below
11 30 sqm
31 - 60sqm
27%
61 - 90sqm
20% 91sqm and upp
1.6.3 AREA OF THE HOUSE
21%
 AREA OF THE HOUSE

10sqm and below 9

11 - 30sqm 20

31 – 60sqm 16

61 – 90sqm 15

91 sqm and up 15

TOTAL: 75 households

In this chart, there are 9 houses that are 10sqm and below (12%). There are 20
houses that have measurement of 11-30sqm (27%). 16 houses that have measurement of 31-60sqm
(21%). 15 houses that are measured 61-90sqm (20%), and 15 houses that have measurement of 91
sqm and up(20%).

1.7 VENTILATION FACILITY

VENTILATION FACILITY
VENTILATION FACILITY
7.74%
Window 75 8.39%
Window
Elec. Fan 55 Elec. Fan
Hand Fan
48.39% Aircon
Hand Fan 13

Aircon 12 35.48%

TOTAL: 155

This chart shown that all the 75 houses has window/s, a percentage of 48.39.
Out of 75 houses, there are 55 houses that owned or used electric fan, comprises 35.48%.
There are 13 households that used hand fan, equivalent to 8.39% and there are 12 houses
that used aircon.
1.8 AMENITIES

AMENITIES
Refrigerator 41 1.8 Amenities
0.97%
Oven Toaster 5 Refrigerator
Oven Toaster
11.00% 13.27%
Television 48 2.59% 1.62% Television
2.59% Iron
Computer
Iron 23 Washing Machine
Radio
Computer 8 15.53% Cellphone
Bicycle
Washing Machine 30 Tricycle
Motorcycle
22.98% Car
Radio 30
Cellphone 71 7.44%

Bicycle 8
9.71% 9.71%
Tricycle 8 2.59%

Motorcycle 34
Car 3
Others: 0
TOTAL: 309

In this chart, we can see the result about how many household uses each of
the amenity mentioned above. There are 41 out of 75 households who owned and
used refrigerator (13.27%). 5 households that use oven toaster (1.62%). 48
households that owned television (15.53%). 23 households use iron (7.44%). 8
households owned computer (2.59%). 30 households owned washing machine
(9.71%). 30 households owned radio (9.71%). 71 households owned cellphones
(22.98%). 8 households owned bicycle (2.59%). 8 households also owned tricycle
(2.59%). 34 households owned motorcycle (13.27%). 3 households owned car
(0.97%).

FAMILY/HOUSEHOLD ASSESMENT

C. ENVIRONMENT AND SANITATION

 1.1 GARBAGE DISPOSAL

GARBAGE DISPOSAL GARBAGE DISPOSAL

Waste Segregation 19

Composting 2 25%
Waste Segregation
Composting
Dumping 0 Burning
3%
Collected
Burning 3 68% 4%

Collected 51

TOTAL: 75

For the garbage disposal in purok 4, 51 households’ wastes are collected (68%). 19
households’ wastes are segregated (25%). 3 households’ garbage disposal is through
burning (4%). 2 households’ garbage disposal is through composting (3%).

1.2 TOILET FACILITY

TOILET FACILITY TOILET FACILITY

None 9 12%
17%
Flush Type 15
None

Hang Latrine 0
20% Flush Type
Open Pit Privy 0
Closed Pit Privy
Closed Pit Privy 1
Bore Hole
Bore Hole 3
1%
Pail System 34 4% Pail System
45%
Water-Sealed Latrine 13 Water-Sealed Latrine

TOTAL: 75 households

As seen above the chart, 46% uses pail system

method 20% flush type, 17% water-sealed latrine, 4% WATER SUPPLY (GENERAL)
of respondents have bore hole type of toilet, 1% is closed
pit privy. In 12% tally in the chart, there are 9
households who have no toilet, but instead they use
communal cr in their community.
River, Spring (Natural)
1.3 WATER SUPPLY (GENERAL)
100%
 WATER SUPPLY

Nawasa 0

Spring (Natural) 75

Water Pump 0

Artesian Well 0

TOTAL: 75 households

The pie chart above illustrates that all the respondents with a total of 75 households
or 100% use spring (natural) as their water supply for general, this include the washing of
clothes, used for bathing, and etc.

1.5 WATER TREATMENT

WATER TREATMENT
WATER TREATMENT

None 47
20%
None
Boiling 13 Boiling
Chlorination
17%
63%
Purified 15

Chlorination 0

TOTAL: 75 households

The graph shows that there are 13 households or 17% who boiled their water for
drinking, 15 households or 20% drink purified water, and 47 households drink non-
treatment or natural water.
WATER STORAGE METHOD

3% 10%

Pail (covered)
1.6 WATER STORAGE METHOD 37%
Pail (uncovered)
Jar (covered)
Jar (uncovered)
Bottles (covered)
26%
Bottles(uncovered)
Others(covered)

4% 10%
11%
 WATER STORAGE METHOD
PAIL: 52
covered 41
uncovered 11
JAR: 16
covered 12 In this tallied chart, we have seen that
uncovered 4 most of the storage used for water is covered
pail, that is used by 52 households equivalent
BOTTLES: 32
to 37%, this is followed with covered bottles
covered 29
equivalent to 26%. For the others, some of
uncovered 3 respondents used covered and uncovered
OTHERS: 11 basin, and tumblers as well.
covered 11 1.7 DOMESTIC ANIMALS
uncovered 0
TOTAL: 111 DOMESTIC ANIMALS
DOMESTIC ANIMALS 1%
5%
27%
18%
Dog 26
Dogs
Cats
Cat 17 Chicken
Pig
Chicken 30 Cow
Others
Pig 17
Bird 0
18%
Cow 1 31%

Carabao 0
Others 5
TOTAL: 96

This chart revealed that 30 households have chickens at home that

corresponds 31% of the pie chart followed by 26 household who owned dogs that is 27%
part of the pie chart. 17 respondents or 18% owned pigs, there are 17 households who
owned cats as well that is equivalent to 18% of the pie chart. 1 household (1%) owned a
cow and the 5 respondents owned other animals, these are white mice, rabbit and hamsters
that is equivalent to 5% of the households.
1.8 VERMIN/PEST
VERMIN/PEST

VERMIN/PEST
Rodents 35
15%
Mosquitos 75 28% Rodents
Mosquitos
Flies
Flies 58 Cockroaches

32%
Cockroaches 64
25%
TOTAL: 232

This tallied result shows that 75

households have mosquitos at home, equivalent to 32% part of the chart. There are 64
households who have cockroaches that is 28% part of the chart. 58 households have flies
around at home that comprises the 25% pie of the chart above and 35 houses have rodents
equivalent to 15%.

HEALTH PROFILE

D.1 BASIC NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION

1.1 FREQUENCY OF DAILY MEALS

FREQUENCY OF DAILY MEALS

FREQUENCY OF DAILY MEALS

No. of Respondents
26% 25%
Breakfast
Breakfast 73 AM Snack
Lunch
AM Snack 21 7% Afternoon Snack
16% Dinner
Lunch 75
26%
Afternoon Snack 45
Dinner 75
TOTAL 289

For this chart, it has been recorded that 73 out of 75 respondents eat
breakfast, this is equivalent to 25%, 21 respondents or 7% eat AM snacks. All tallied
respondents eat lunch and dinner that is equivalent to 26% both lunch and dinner. 45 of
the respondents eat afternoon snacks.
 1.2 DAILY MEAL COMPOSITION

DAILY MEAL COMPOSITION

DAILY MEAL NO. OF
COMPOSITION RESPONDENTS
13%
30%
Carbohydrates 72 Carbohydrates
Protein
28% Fats
Protein 71 Nutritional Supplement

Fats 66 30%

Nutritional Supplement 31

TOTAL: 240

This interpretation shows how many respondents eat foods that contain
carbs, proteins, fats, and nutritional supplements. 72 respondents or 30% eat foods that
contain carbohydrates. There are 71 respondents equivalent to 30% who eat protein foods,
66 respondents or 27% part of the chart eat foods that contain fats and 31 respondents or
13% part of the chart have taken nutritional supplement.

1.3 Average Fluid Intake of Family Members

1.3 AVERAGE FLUID INTAKE

11%
3%
AVERAGE FLUID INTAKE NO. OF
OF FAMILY MEMBERS RESPONDENTS 3 Glasses
42% 5 Glasses
8 Glasses
3 Glasses (500 – 800cc) 38 Others
45%
5 Glasses (800 – 1,200cc) 155
8Glasses (1,200 – 2,000cc) 145
Others 9
TOTAL: 347

Among the 347 respondents, there are 38 respondents (11%) who drink water for 3
glasses a day while 155 respondents(45%) drink 5 glasses a day of water. 145 respondents
or 42% drink 8 glasses of water a day. The others that consist of 9 respondents drink 2
glasses of water. Some can drink up to more than 10 glasses of water a day.
1.4 FOOD/NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS
1.4 Food Nutritional Supplement
0%
FOOD NO. OF 9%
NUTRITIONAL RESPONDENTS 11%
SUPPLEMENTS
Ferrous Sulfate
Ferrous Sulfate (Iron) 1 Ascorbic Acid
Multivitamins
None
Ascorbic Acid 31

Multivitamins 38
None 277 80%

TOTAL: 347

In this chart, it indicates that majority of the respondents have no

food/nutritional supplements taken, this is the 80% part of the pie chart, 38 respondents
have taken multivitamins that covers 11% part of the pie. 31 respondents have taken
ascorbic acid that covers up 9% of the pie chart and only 1 respondent have taken ferrous
sulfate (iron).

1.5 FOOD STORAGE

1.5 Food Storage
FOOD STORAGE NO. OF
HOUSEHOLDS 7%

Basket 31 37% Basket

Cabinet
Cabinet 10 Refrigerator
Others

Refrigerator 37 44%

Others 6
12%
TOTAL: 84

In the chart shown above, 37 households (44%) uses refrigerator as their

food storage, 31 households (37%) uses basket as their food storage. 10 households (12%)
uses cabinet as their food storage and the other 6 respondents uses pail as their food
storage.

D. 2. FAMILY HEALTH STATUS

 2.1 PRESENCE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASE
2.1 Presence of Communicable Disease

PRESENCE OF NO. OF
COMMUNICABLE HOUSEHOLDS
3%
DISEASE
With communicable disease
With Communicable 2 Without communicable disease
Disease
Without Communicable 73
Disease
97%
TOTAL: 75

As data shown above, there are 70 households that has no family member with
communicable disease and covers most of the pie chart above (97%) while there are 2
households that has a family member with communicable disease, this is TB disease and
covers only 3% of the pie chart.

2.2 FAMILY MEMBERS WHO PRACTICE SMOKING

2.2 Family Members Who Practice Smoking

FAMILY MEMBERS NO. OF

WHO PRACTICE HOUSEHOLDS 28%
SMOKING Does Smoke
Does Not Smoke

Does Smoke 21 72%

Does Not Smoke 54

TOTAL: 75

As the chart elaborated above, there are 21 households (28%) who have family
members who smoke cigarettes while there are 54 households who have family members
that doesn’t smoke or equivalent to 72% part of
2.3 Family Members Who Practice Alcohol Drinking
the chart.

2.3 FAMILY MEMBERS WHO PRACTICE

ALCOHOL DRINKING 40%
Does drink alcohol beverages
Does not drink
60%
 FAMILY MEMBERS NO. OF
WHO PRACTICE HOUSEHOLDS
ALCOHOL DRINKING

Drinking Alcohol Beverages 30

Does Not Drink 45

TOTAL: 75

In the chart presented, there are 30 households that have family members who
practiced drinking alcoholic beverages that covers 40% of the chart, while 45 households
who have family members who doesn’t practice alcoholic drinks and it covers 60% of the
pie chart.

D.3 RELAXATION AND RECREATION

3.1 METHODS OF RELAXATION

3.1 Methods of Relaxation

METHODS OF NO. OF
7%
RELAXATION RESPONDENTS 8%
2%
Reading 25 34%
Reading
Sports 27 Sports
Playing Cards
Watching TV
Playing Cards 6 Others

Meditation 0
Watching TV 170
49%
Others: 119
TOTAL: 347
The chart above indicates that majority of the respondents’ way of relaxing is
through watching tv, there are 170 respondents of it (49%). Followed by other ways of
relaxation, namely; sleeping, using gadgets, scrolling through social media apps and this
covers 34% of the pie chart. 27 respondents who play sports, most likely basketball (8%).
25 respondents who read books or news to relax (7%). 6 respondents who play cards to
relax and covers 2% in the pie chart.
 D. 4. EXERCISE/ACTIVITY PATTERN

4.1 FREQUENCY OF EXERCISE

4.1 Frequency of Exercise

FREQUENCY OF EXERISE NO. OF
RESPONDENTS 11.8%
Once a week 41 6.1%

Twice a week 21 3.7% Once a week

0.3% Twice a week
3x a week 13 3x a week
5x a week
4x a week 0 55.6%
Everyday
None
5x a week 1
22.5%
6x a week 0
Everyday 78
None 193
TOTAL: 347

The chart shows that 22.5% respondents do exercise everyday, 11.8% do exercise
once a week, 6.1% do exercise twice a week, 3.7% do exercise thrice a week and 0.3% do
exercise five times a week, while the remaining 55.6% respondents don’t do any exercise.

4..2 TYPE OF EXERCISE

4.2 Type of Exercise

10%
TYPE OF EXERCISE NO. OF 2%
4%

RESPONDENTS 2%
Brisk walking
5% Jogging
Running
Weight Lifting
Brisk Walking 103 Cycling
10% Dancing
Jogging 16 Others

67%
Running 7
Weight Lifting 3
Cycling 3
Dancing 6
Others 16
TOTAL: 154

From the pie chart, it is clear that majority of the respondents picked brisk walking
as their type of exercise with the percentage of 67. Nearly 5% respondents do running and
4% of them do dancing. Some do weightlifting and cycling with the same percentage of 3%,
6% respondents prefer to jog, while other exercises are pushup/abs workout and
stretching.

D.5. USE OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES METHODS OF PROTECTION DURING SLEEP

5.1 Methods of Protection During Sleep

METHODS OF NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS Insect Repellant Sray

5%
11% Insect Repellant (Katol)
PROTECTION Mosquito Net
None
DURING SLEEP 11% Others

32%
Insect Repellant Spray 4

Insect Repellant Topical 0

Insect Repellant (Katol) 24 41%

Mosquito Net 31

None 8

Others 8

TOTAL: 75

The data above shows that most of the households use mosquito net as their
methods of protection during sleep with a total of 41% in the chart, followed by 24
households who uses katol with an average tally of 32%. 4 households uses insect spray or
5% part of the chart. There are 8 households who have no protection during sleep and 8
other households uses ceiling/electric fans and blankets as their protection during sleep
that comprises 11% of the chart.

CHILD-HEALTH INFORMATION

1.1 BODY MASS INDEX

1.1 Body Mass Index
2%

BODY MASS INDEX NO. OF 20%

RESPONDENTS

<than normal range

<Than normal range 2 within normal range
>normal range

77%
Within normal range 64

>Normal range 17
TOTAL: 83

Out of 83 child responses, there are 64 or 77% whose BMI are within normal range,
17 respondents or 21% are above normal range while the 2 child respondents’ BMI are
below normal range.

1.2 IMMUNIZATION STATUS

1.2 Immunization Status
1%

IMMUNIZATION NO. OF
STATUS RESPONDENTS

Fully Immunized
Incompletely Immunized
Fully Immunized 82

Incompletely 1
Immunized
TOTAL: 83 99%

The pie chart above indicates that out of 83 child respondents, 82 of them are fully
immunized this is an equal to 99% and the 1 respondent has lacking immunization (MMR
vaccine).

1.3 TYPE OF BIRTH

1.3 TYPE OF BIRTH

TYPE OF BIRTH NO. OF

RESPONDENTS 6%

Normal Section
Normal Delivery 78 Cesarian Section

94%
Cesarian Section 5

TOTAL: 83

The pie chart illustrates that 78 child respondents or 94% were delivered normally,
and 5 child respondents or 6% were delivered through cesarian section.

HEIGHT

Height
HEIGHT NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
7%
4%

Within Expected Range 74 Within expected range per age

per Age Below expected range per age
Above expected range per age
Below Expected Range 3
per Age
89%
Above Expected Range 6
per Age
TOTAL: 83

The graph above shows that 74 or 89% of child respondents are within the expected
range per ae in terms of height, 3 or 4% of the child respondents are below expected range
per age, and there are 6 or 7% of the child respondents are above expected range per age.

WEIGHT
Weight
WEIGHT NO. OF 2% 8%

RESPONDENTS

Within Expected Range 74 Within expected range per age

Below expected range per age
per Age Abive expected range per age

Below Expected Range 2

89%
per Age
Above Expected Range 7
per Age
TOTAL: 83

Among the 83 children that ages between 0-12 years old, there are 74 children who’s
weights are within expected range to their age or 89% part of the chart. 2 children are
below expected range to their age or 2% and the 7 children were above expected range to
their age or 9% part of the pie chart.

F. MATERNAL-FAMILY INFORMATION

F.1.1 FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES

F.1.1 Family Planning Practices

FAMILY PLANNING NO. OF

PRACTICES RESPONDENTS 32%

None
None 20 Natural
Artificial

Natural 1
65%
Artificial 10 3%

TOTAL: 31

Out of 31 mothers we interviewed, the data above shows that most of them have no
family planning practices, respondents of 20 and it is 65% part in the chart. 10 respondents
uses pills, an artificial family planning method that covers 32% of the pie chart and only 1
respondent uses natural family planning method, that is the withdrawal and it is only 3%
part of the chart.

1.2 PLACE OF DELIVERY

Place of Delivery

PLACE OF DELIVERY NO. OF 24%

RESPONDENTS

Hospital 25 Hospital
Home
Home 8

76%
RHU 0
TOTAL: 33

For this chart, out of 31 mothers, there are 25 of them who delivered their baby, it
comprises 76% of the pie chart indicated above. 8 mothers who had home birth, a total of
24%.

1.3 PRENATAL CONSULTATION / DELIVERY HISTORY

1.3 Prenatal Consultation

PRENATAL NO. OF 3%
CONSULTATION RESPONDENTS
30%

Hilot 11
Hilot
Midwife 25 Midwife
MD
RN 0
MD 1
None 0 68%

TOTAL: 37

In this chart, respondents had their prenatal consultation/delivery history with

midwives, that comprises 67%, there are 25 respondents of it. 11 respondents had their
prenatal consultation with hilot, this comprises 30% of the total pie chart. 1 respondent
had her prenatal consultation with an MD, total of 3%. The respondents doesn’t coincide
in the result of tally because some of the mothers had their prenatal consultation with both
hilot and midwife.

G. HEALTH UTILIZATION INFORMATION

G.1. PHILHEALTH MEMBERSHIP

G.1. Philhealth Membership

PHILHEALTH NO. OF
MEMBERSHIP RESPONDENTS
32%

Member
Non-Member

68%
Member 236

Non-Member 111

TOTAL: 347

As per result above, there are 236 individuals who are philhealth members with an
average of 68% of the pie chart. 111 respondent who are non-members of philhealth that
comprises 32% of the pie chart above.

2. MEDICAL/DENTAL CONSULTATION
MEDICAL/DENTAL CONSULTATION
MEDICAL/DENTAL NO. OF
CONSULTATION HOUSEHOLDS
None 0
Bisaya 24
Bisaya Brgy. Health Center
Brgy. Health Center 16
Private 13 Private RHU/Sentro

RHU/Sentro 6
Hospital
Hospital 35
TOTAL: 94

In this chart, we have seen that majority of the households consult in hospital with a
total households of 35 and is equal to 37% of the pie chart. 24 households have their
consultation in binisaya, total of 26% in the pie chart. 16 households consult to brgy.
Health center or total as 17% . 13 households consult to private hospital or with personal
physician, total of 14%. 6 respondents consult to RHU, a total of 6%.

3. AWARENESS OF DOH PROGRAMS

AWARENESS OF DOH PROGRAMS
AWARENESS OF NO. OF
DOH PROGRAMS RESPONDENTS
Aware 104
Not Aware 243
TOTAL: 347 30%

AWARE NOT AWARE

70%
 The chart revealed that only 104 out of 347 respondents who are aware of DOH
Programs, this covers up 30% of the pie chart while 243 respondents who are not aware of
DOH Programs that covers most of the pie chart which is 70%.

4. DOH PROGRAM AVAILED

DOH PROGRAM AVAILED
DOH PROGRAM NO. OF
AVAILED RESPONDENTS
Maternal-Child 25 Maternal-Child Program
Program
6%
EPI 51 13% EPI
Family Planning 74
Family Planning
Mgt. of CD and Non- 0
CD 62%
19%
Mgt. of CD and Non-CD
Others 0
None 239 None
TOTAL: 389

The chart shown above is about the list of DOH Programs that are availed by
respondents. There are 25 respondents (6%) who have availed Maternal-Child Program,
51 of the respondents(13%) availed EPI. 74 respondents(19%) have availed family
planning, None of the respondents availed the Mgt. of CD and Non-CD. While majority of
the respondents have no availed DOH Programs that consists of 239 respondents.

5. HEALTH MANAGEMENT HEALTH MANAGEMENT

29%
HEALTH NO. OF Home Managed
MANAGEMENT HOUSEHOLDS 48% Albularyo/ Bisaya

Home Managed 29 Consult Medical/ Hospital

Albularyo/ Bisaya 22 22%

Consult 48
Medical/Hospital
TOTAL: 99
 The pie chart above illustrates that there are 29 households out of 75 households
(29%) who managed their health at home, 22 households (22%) seek albularyo/binisaya.
There are 48 households(49%) consult their health in medical hospital.

6. SUPPLY OF MEDICAL/HEALTH THERAPY SUPPLY OF MEDICAL/HEALTH THERAPY

SUPPLY OF NO. OF
MEDICAL/HEALTH HOUSEHOLDS
THERAPY 1%
None 1 34% 35% None
Community/Herbal 32 Community/Herbal Garden
Garden Government/RHU Org.
Government/RHU 27 Others

Others 31
TOTAL: 91 30%

The chart above indicates that there are 32 out of 75 households (35%) use
community/herbal garden as their medicine supply, 31 households (34%) are others; who
buy their medicine supply. There are 30% or 27 households go to government/RHU agency
for their medicine supply, and there is 1 household (1%) who don’t have any medicine
supply.

H. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY INFORMATION

H.1. ADULT MORBIDITY RATE (WITHIN THE ADULT MORBIDITY RATE (LAST 3 YRS)
LAST 3 YRS)

ADULT MORBIDITY NO. OF

RATE (LAST 3 YRS) HOUSEHOLDS
Diarrhea 5 26%
32%
Hypertension 5 Diarrhea
Hypertension
Acute Lower RTI and 0 Heart Diseases
Pneumonia Chickenpox
Influenza 0 5% Others
TB Respirator\\y 0 11% 26%
Heart Diseases 2
Chickenpox 1
Measles 0
Others 6
TOTAL: 19

As shown in the pie chart above, there are 5 household (26%) had a family member
who experienced diarrhea and hypertension within the last 3 years, 1 household(5%)
experienced chickenpox, 2 households (11%) had a family member who experienced heart
disease, and there are 6 households (32%) belongs to others; experienced covid, asthma,
leukemia, and gallstone within the last 3 years.

H.2. ADULT MORTALITY RATE (FOR THE PAST 5 YRS)

ADULT MORTALITY RATE (PAST 5 YRS)
ADULT MORTALITY NO. OF
RATE (PAST 5 YRS) HOUSEHOLDS
Natural (Old Age) 1
Heart Disease 1 20% 20%
Pneumonia 1 Natural (Old Age)
Cancer 1 Heart Disease
Pneumonia
COPD and Allied 20% 20% Cancer
Others
Conditions
Killed Thru Crime: 20%
Murder
Homicide
Others 1
TOTAL: 5

The chart above illustrates that 20% or 1 household had a family member for the
past 5 years who died due to old age, 1 household (20%) had a family member who dies due
to heart diseases, 1 household (20%) had a family member died to pneumonia, 1 household
(20%) belongs to others; family member who died due to covid.

H.3. INFANT MORTALITY RATE INFANT MORTALITY RATE

1.33%
INFANT MORTALITY NO. OF
RATE HOUSEHOLDS
Pneumonia 1
Bacterial Sepsis of 0 Pneumonia None

Newborn
Complications of 0
Pregnancy
Unknown 0
Others 0
TOTAL: 1
 As seen above, only 1 household that has a 1 infant who died due to pneumonia this
is equivalent to 1.33% .

Accomplishment Report

Last March 10, 2023 in Maquilao, Tangub City, the researchers presented a graph
interpretation regarding the total outcome of each profile’s information. The barangay staff and
institute instructors were invited to the venue. At 8:45 am, the event properly started with an
opening prayer and the CAES coordinator’s welcome remarks. Throughout the program, one
member from each group gave an explanation of the graph, showing the proportion of each
result, and at the end of the presentation, the researchers indicated the foreseeable crisis, health
deficit, and the health threat. Right after the presentation, the barangay health workers gave their
insights about the presented graph summary and then asked some questions regarding it. At
10:30 am, the program officially ended with the closing remarks by an instructor of the institute.
At last, for almost one month preparation of the presentation, the presenting of graph summary
was done successfully. Though it was a kind of challenging, but the researchers’ efforts were
worth and beneficial.

DOCUMENTATION
 CHAPTER III
Computation Score Justification

Community Problem in Purok-4 Brgy. Maquilao, Tangub City

Presence of Vermin, Pest, Insects and Rodents;

*Poor environmental sanitation
*Lack of awareness about cleanliness
*Poor Drainage system

Vermin, Pest, Insects and Rodents

CRITERIA COMPUTATION SCOR JUSTIFICATION
E
1. Nature of the 2/3x1 0.67 It is a human threat
Problem

The problem is partially modifiable in a sense

2. Modifiability 1/2x1 0.5 that the intervention that will be made (Public
of the Problem health dissemination) that will result in
people’s awareness of the problem.

3. Preventive The problem on the presence of vermin’s,

Potential 3/3x1 1 pest, insects and rodents can be minimized
and be prevented with a high chance of
change.

4. Salience The community recognizes the problem as

1/2x1 0.5 serious and needs immediate attention.

Community Health Care Plan

1. Presence of Vermin and Pest as Health Threat

-75 households have mosquitos that is equivalent to 32%, 64 households also have cockroaches
with a total of 28%, 58 households have flies that compromises 25%, and 35 households have
rodents equivalent to 15%, this data is based from the data we have gathered from Purok-4
Maquilao, Tangub City.

2. Nursing Diagnosis
1. Inability to provide a home environment which is conductive to health maintenance and
personality development due to;

-lack of knowledge of the importance of home environmental improvement

-lack of enthusiasm in cleaning up
-lack salience of problem

3. Objectives
1. Goal of the student
 -To provide necessary information and introduce preventive measures on the causes of
the presence of vermin, pest, insects and rodents and its effects on the health of the
community in Purok-4 Brgy. Maquilao Tagub City.

2. Goal of the community

-The families or households of Purok-4 Maquilao, Tangub City will comply on how to
control aforementioned insects, pest, rodents and vermin.
-the families will demonstrate and apply those procedures and behaviors that can help in
controlling presence of insects and rodents.
-that after giving health teachings, the family will be able to maintain healthy home
environment.

4. Planning
-create activities such as health teaching
-discuss alternative methods of insects control such as regular house cleaning, and proper
garbage disposal
-emphasize the importance of insects and rodents control
-Encourage the family to continue the practice of covering stored foods.

5. Implementation/Intervention
-conduct health teachings
-provide preventive and alternative measures
-introduce preventive materials to control the presence of the said insects and rodents
such as mosquito nets, off lotion and etc.
-encourage families to maintain cleanliness of the environment around their households.

CHAPTER IV

Community Health Midwifery Plan

ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES DIAGNOSIS PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATIO

 SUBJECTIVE GOAL OF THE > Inability to provide >create activities > Encourage the family
>“daghan jud kaayug STUDENTS a home environment such as health to continue the practice
mga insekto labi na which is conductive to teaching of covering stored
lamok sa among palibot >To provide necessary health maintenance foods.
tungod kay duol man information and and personality
gud mig baybay usa pa introduce preventive development due to; > provide preventive
daghan kaayug basura” measures on the causes and alternative
as verbalized by one of > discuss alternative
of the presence - lack of knowledge of measures
the respondent at methods of insects
of vermin, pest, insects the importance of
Purok-4 Barangay control such as
and rodents and its home environmental
Maquilao Tangub City regular house
effects on the health of improvement
cleaning, and proper
the community
garbage
in Purok-4 Brgy. -lack of enthusiasm in disposal
Maquilao Tagub City. cleaning up > introduce preventive
materials to control the
presence of the said
OBJECTIVE -lack salience of
insects and rodents
GOAL OF THE problem
> emphasize the such as mosquito nets,
COMMUNITY
>75 households have importance of off lotion and etc
mosquitos that is insects and rodents
equivalent to 32%, 64 >The families or
control
households also have households of Purok-4
Maquilao, Tangub City > encourage families to
cockroaches with a total
will comply on how to maintain cleanliness of
of 28%, 58 households
control > Encourage the the environment around
have flies that
aforementioned family to continue their households.
compromises 25%, and
35 households have insects, pest, rodents the practice of
rodents equivalent to and vermin covering stored
15%, this data is based foods.
from the data we have - the families will
gathered from Purok-4 demonstrate and apply
Maquilao, Tangub City those procedures and
behaviors that can help
in controlling
presence of insects and
rodents

- That after giving

health teachings, the
family will be able to
maintain healthy home
environment.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The survey was conducted as part of our community extension which serves as baseline
data, in order for us to clearly identify the issues facing by the barangay and be able to work with
the community, especially with the Barangay Councils and BHWs, to implement solutions that
may be useful in resolving these issues.

Based on the findings, vermin and pests were the prioritized issue facing by the residents
in Purok-4 Maquilao, Tangub City. Thus, the group recommends the following:

 The barangay should have an ordinance concerning proper waste management.

 Programs that introduce preventive materials to control the presence of vermin
and pests must be implemented.
 Families have to maintain cleanliness of the environment and around the
household.
 Programs implemented by the group must be continued.
 The BHWs should continuously trained.

References.
Hope, R. (2020). “COPAR – Community Organizing Participatory Action Research”.
RNSPEAK. https://rnspeak.com/copar-community-organizing-participatory-action-research/

Jimenez, C. (2008). “Community Organizing Participatory Action Research (CO-PAR) for

Community Health Development: Helping People Grow and Glow”. QC: C&E Publishing, Inc.

Vera, M. (2013). “Community Organizing Participatory Action Research (COPAR)”.

NURSESLABS. https://nurseslabs.com/copar-community-organizing-participatory-action-
research/

Kawachi, I. (2015). A journal of “Social Science and Medicine”.

Group 4 Researchers

Bernido, Honey Hope Charity T.

Coligado, Mea Carrien F.
Cubero, Jessel Jean T.
Entrampas, Ricka Mae V.
Eslit, Angelica C.
Matalines, Reymark H.
Sayson, Jane Rose V.
Sevillejo, Mariejoh S.

Noted by:

Cristely C. Maca, RM
Instructor

Jemelyn L. Dapar, RM
Instructor

Maria Luisa P. Antipolo, RN

Instructor