Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Ethanol and Aqueous Extracts From Urtica Urens
Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Ethanol and Aqueous Extracts From Urtica Urens
Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Ethanol and Aqueous Extracts From Urtica Urens
Massara Mzid, Sameh Ben Khedir, Maryem Ben Salem, Wafa Regaieg & Tarek
Rebai
To cite this article: Massara Mzid, Sameh Ben Khedir, Maryem Ben Salem, Wafa Regaieg &
Tarek Rebai (2017) Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of ethanol and aqueous extracts from
Urtica�urens, Pharmaceutical Biology, 55:1, 775-781, DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2016.1275025
RESEARCH ARTICLE
CONTACT Massara Mzid mzid.masarra@gmail.com Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Tunisia, Avenue Majida Boulila, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
ß 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distri-
bution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
776 M. MZID ET AL.
purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). All other Determination of hydrolyzable tannin
chemicals, namely L-ascorbic acid, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (mix-
ture of phosphomolybdate and phosphotungstate, Sigma) and The hydrolyzable tannin content was determined from AECS
other solvents were of analytical grade. All solutions were freshly using the potassium iodide test (Saad et al. 2012). The analysis
prepared in distilled water. was performed in triplicate and the results were expressed in mg
equivalent of gallic acid per gram of dried extract (mg GAE/g
DW) using the calibration curve of gallic acid
Plant material (y ¼ 0.121x þ 0.011, r2 ¼ 0.9819).
Estimation of vitamin E
Total flavonoids compound
The extraction of vitamin E from the method has been described
The total flavonoid content of Urtica urens extracts was deter- by both Katsanidis and Addis (1999).
mined by the method described by Zhishen et al. (1999).
Flavonoid content was expressed as mg quercetin equivalent
(QE)/g dried extract. Values presented are the average of three Estimation of vitamin C
measurements.
Ascorbic acid was determined as described by Jacques-Silva et al.
y ¼ 0:0182x 0:004; r2 ¼ 0:9949 : (2001).
PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY 777
Results
Extraction yield and polyphenol, flavonoid and hydrolyzable
tannin contents
The yield of extractable components relative to the weight of
dried plant material ranged from 4.768% for EtOH extract and
0.87% for WA extract. The results of the phytochemical analysis
Figure 1. Antioxidant capacity of ethanol and aqueous extracts of Urtica urens
evinced the quantitative values of EtOH extract: 31.41 ± 0.31 mg by the DPPH· method at different concentrations. BHT and ascorbic acid (Vitamin
GAE/g E to phenolic compound, 6.81 ± 1.72 mg R/g E to flavo- C) were used as positive control. Values are means ± SEM (n ¼ 3).
noids and 8.29 ± 0.3 mg GAE/g E to hydrolyzable tannin
(Table 1). For WA extract; 5.34 ± 0.21 mg GAE/g E to total
Table 1. Extract yield and total flavonoids, phenolic and tannin contents from Table 2. Antioxidant activity of Urtica urens extracts (ABTSþ, DPPH).
Urtica urens extracts. DPPH ABTSþ DPPH ABTSþ
Flavonoids Phenolics Tannins scavenging scavenging scavenging scavenging
Sample Yield (%) (mg quercetin/g DW) (mg GAE/g DW) (mg GAE/g DW) Sample (IC50, lg/mL) (IC50, lg/mL) (mg TE/g extract) (mg TE/g extract)
Ethanol 4.768 6.81 ± 1.72 31.41 ± 0.31 8.29 ± 0.3 Ethanol 245.65 ± 10.2 30.88 ± 3.03 65.33 ± 10.72 560.33 ± 29.45
Aqueous 0.87 5.34 ± 0.21 29.56 ± 1.56 4.05 ± 0.52 Aqueous 142.94 ± 10.54 14.65 ± 1.09 45.67 ± 10.21 350.33 ± 18.73
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent determinations. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent determinations.
p < 0.05. p < 0.001.
DW: dry weight. TE: Trolox equivalents; IC: Inhibition Concentration.
778 M. MZID ET AL.
Figure 2. ABTS (TEAC) activities of Urtica urens extracts. Values are means ± SEM Figure 4. FRAP activities in ethanol and water extracts of Urtica urens. Values
(n ¼ 3). p < 0.001. represent means ± SEM (n ¼ 3). p < 0.001. a: compared to BHT; b: compared
to Ethanol.
Trolox/g DW versus WA extract had much less activity com- S. aureus, M. luteus and E. faecalis) and Gram-negative (E. coli,
pared to EtOH, 350.33 ± 18.73 mol Trolox/g DW (Figure 2). P. aeruginosa and S. enteritidis) bacteria. The evaluation of the
antibacterial activity was realized by the determination of MIC
and MBC values. Table 3 reveal that all extracts vary the degrees
b-carotene bleaching by linoleic acid assay of antibacterial activity against most of the tested Gram-positive
and Gram-negative bacteria, and the EtOH extract was found to
The b-carotene scavenging activity of the two extracts at different be the most effective. In fact, it displayed a large antimicrobial
concentrations was compared with that of butylated hydroxyto- spectrum and exerted a major antibacterial effect against both
luene (BHT), as shown in Figure 3. In this study, the addition of tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. While the
Urtica urens extracts and BHT prevented bleaching of the most vulnerable bacteria for the EtOH extract were for Gram-
b-carotene at different degrees. The WA and EtOH extracts of positive (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus
Urtica urens demonstrated high ability to prevent bleaching luteus and Staphylococcus epidermidis), and two Gram-negative
of the b-carotene. Interestingly, they exhibited a strong inhibition bacteria (Salmonella enteritidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) at
of the b-carotene bleaching up to 71.12% and 60.52%, respect- concentration of 150 lg/mL. However, the WA extract did not
ively, at concentrations up to 500 lg/mL. show any effect on almost all the tested bacteria.
Antibacterial activity The total polyphenol, flavonoid and tannin content in the EtOH
and WA extracts were determined. It is well known that phenolic
The antibacterial activity of the various Urtica urens extracts and flavonoid compounds contribute directly to the biological
was assessed against Gram-positive (B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, activity of plant materials (Rice-Evans et al. 1996).
PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY 779
Table 4. Levels of vitamins D, C and E in Urtica urens leaves. could be attributed to the fact that the ABTSþ assay is aqueous
Sample Vitamin D (mg/100 g) Vitamin C (mg/100 g) Vitamin E (mg/100 g) based, favouring hydrophilic compounds; whereas the DPPH
Ethanol 1.45 ± 0.14 238 ± 2.95 356 ± 0.15 assay is an organic based assay, favouring hydrophobic phytocon-
Aqueous 0.23 ± 0.04 160.55 ± 3.09a 2.3 ± 0.01a stituents (Schlesier et al. 2002).
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent determinations. On the other hand, EtOH extract was ineffective regarding
p < 0.001.
cellular-ROS neutralization. Instead, it caused a significant over-
a: compared to Ethanol.
production of intracellular ROS. It has been shown that Urtica
urens can have an antioxidant or pro-oxidant effect depending
With 4.768% of yield in the EtOH extract, the results of the on their concentration and/or structural properties.
phytochemical analysis exhibited the quantitative values of Urtica The antioxidant activity increased with increasing extract con-
urens 31.41 ± 0.31 mg GAE/g E to phenolic compound, centration. The EtOH extract of Urtica urens displayed a signifi-
6.81 ± 1.72 mg R/g E to flavonoids and 8.29 ± 0.3 mg GAE/g E to cant (p < 0.001) cell-free (IC50 ¼ 30.88 ± 3.03 lg/mL of ABTSþ)
hydrolyzable tannin. These results demonstrate that the Urtica as comparison with WA extract (Table 2). This could be ascribed
urens has high quantities of phenolic compounds. Other studies to patuletin, an abundant and potent aglycon flavonol extracted
performing quantification of the phenolic compounds and flavo- from Urtica urens (Ataa et al. 1995). This phytochemical is lipo-
noids in EtOH extract of leaves showed their presence in large philic and readily crosses the cell membrane, making it easily
quantity as compared with our results for the phenolic com- available in the cytosol to exert its protective antioxidant action
pounds and flavonoids (Manu Kumar et al. 2013). (Abdel-Wahhab et al. 2005).
The content of phenolic compounds found in plants may vary The b-carotene bleaching method is based on the loss of the
during processing steps such as growing, harvesting, storage and orange colour of b-carotene due to its reaction with radicals
technological procedures used (Lombardo et al. 2010). The phen- formed by linoleic acid oxidation in an emulsion. The rate of
olic compounds present in plants have received great attention b-carotene bleaching can be slowed down in the presence of anti-
because of their antioxidant properties and they can potentially oxidants (Kulisic et al. 2004). Interestingly, the WA and EtOH
interact with biological systems and play an important role in extracts exhibited strong inhibition of b-carotene bleaching com-
anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activity (Wang parable to BHT and ascorbic acid. The control, without addition
et al. 2003; Abu-Reidah et al. 2013). The antioxidant properties
of sample, oxidized rapidly and the absorbance at 470 nm tends
are attributed to flavonoids due to their hydroxyl groups that
to zero. Therefore, the higher antioxidant activity of compounds
can act as free radical scavengers, reducing agents and metal
from the Urtica urens extracts in this assay suggests a possible
chelation (Agati et al. 2012). It has been reported that free
biological functionality in preventing the oxidative degradation of
radical-scavenging activity is greatly influenced by the phenolic
membrane lipids.
composition of the sample (Cheung et al. 2003). The antioxidant
In this study, we used FRAP assay because it is quick and
activity of the WA and EtOH extracts may be attributed to their
simple to perform, and its reaction is reproducible and linearly
phenolic and flavonoid contents.
related to the molar concentration of the antioxidant(s) present.
The antiradical activity assay is based on the reduction of 1,1-
This method was initially developed to assay plasma antioxidant
diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). The ability of the extracts and
capacity, but could be used to measure the antioxidant capacity
standard ascorbic acid to scavenge free radicals and pair off the
odd electron was shown in this assay. It was observed that WA from a wide range of biological samples and pure compounds to
and EtOH extracts of Urtica urens are a similar scavenger of fruits, wines, and animal tissues. In our study, the EtOH extract
DPPH radical compared with the standard BHT. The highest had higher ferrous reducing antioxidant power compared to
inhibition effects of WA and EtOH extracts of Urtica urens were standard BHT which had 75.56 ± 3.57 lmol Fe (II)/g DW (Figure 4).
64.56% and 93.56%, respectively, compared with ascorbic acid FRAP assay demonstrated that EtOH extract had higher activity
with 99.83% and BHT with 95.56% at concentration of 40 mg/L. (106.23 ± 3.45 lmol Fe (II)/g DW) than that of BHT. Based on
However, in our results, further increase in the concentration of this background, this study concludes that Urtica urens is consid-
the Urtica urens extracts displayed increasing inhibition of DPPH ered as a potential source of natural antioxidants. The presence
radical. of general phytochemicals and specific active compounds might
According to Manu Kumar et al. (2013), using DPPH to be responsible for their therapeutic effects. Their reducing power
measure the results of radical scavenging activities, Urtica urens is probably attributed to the presence of polyphenols that may
leaf extract by methanol showed higher activity (78% at 0.5 mg/mL) act in a similar way as reductones by donating the electrons and
among the other solvents and ethyl acetate displayed lower activity reacting with free radicals to convert them into more stable
compared to ethanol, water and acetone. products and terminate the free radical chain reaction
As is well known, the antioxidant activity of plant extracts (Siddhuraju & Becker 2007). Reductones also react with certain
containing polyphenol components is assigned to their capacity precursors of peroxide, thus preventing the formation of the lat-
to be donors of hydrogen atoms or electrons and to capture the ter (Matsushige et al. 1996). The antioxidant activity has con-
free radicals (Shon et al. 2003). The DPPH radical-scavenging firmed the medicinal importance of plants as naturally-occurring
assay is a widely used method to evaluate the ability of plant antioxidants (Venkatachalam & Muthukrishnan 2012).
extracts to scavenge free radicals generated from DPPH reagent According to Manu Kumar et al. (2013), FRAP assay exhib-
(Chung et al. 2006). ited ethanol fraction activity of 80 lmol Fe(II)/g DW. The anti-
Like DPPH, the method of ABTSþ or TEAC (Trolox bacterial activity of Urtica urens extracts was evaluated against
Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity) is widely used to evaluate the Gram-positive (B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, S. aureus, M. luteus and
antioxidant capacity of a variety of substances including plant E. faecalis) and Gram-negative (E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S.
extracts. enteritidis) bacteria. These strains are available in the laboratory.
The TEAC value takes into account the capacity of a sub- The antibacterial activity was assessed by the determination of
stance to react with ABTSþ radical (Arts et al. 2004). The water MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (the
extract caused a greater attenuation of ABTSþ than DPPH. This minimum concentration that inhibits all visible growth of
780 M. MZID ET AL.
microorganisms for 48 h at 37 C) (Diao et al. 2014). As can be Urtica urens extracts are a substantial source of vitamins C, E
seen in Table 3, Urtica urens showed varying degrees of antibac- and D.
terial activity against most of the Gram-positive and Gram-nega-
tive bacteria tested. The aqueous extract was found to be not
active against all tested bacteria. Ethanol extract exhibited anti- Conclusion
bacterial activity (bactericidal) against Gram-positive (Bacillus
The results of this study concluded that the leaves of Urtica urens
subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus and
contain appreciable number of flavonoids, polyphenols and tan-
Staphylococcus epidermidis), and two Gram-negative bacteria
nins. The extracts seem to present a real interest and potential
(Salmonella enteritidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) at concen-
through their antioxidant activities that have been made by the
tration of 150 lg/mL.
different tests (DPPH, ABTS, b-carotene and FRAP).
The reason for the difference in sensitivity between
Their antioxidant activities further lend credence to the bio-
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria might be ascribed to
logical value of this plant. The EtOH extract shows activity
the differences in morphological constitutions between these
against bacteria. This may be due to high phenolic content and
microorganisms; Gram-negative bacteria having an outer phos-
the presence of active compounds such as tannins.
pholipidic membrane carrying the structural lipopolysaccharide
components. This makes the cell wall impermeable to antimicro-
bial chemical substances. On the other hand, Gram-positive bac-
Acknowledgements
teria are more susceptible, having only an outer peptidoglycan
layer which is not an effective permeability barrier. Therefore, This research was supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher
the cell walls of Gram-negative organisms are more complex in Education and Scientific Research.
lay out than Gram-positive ones acting as a diffusional barrier
and making them less susceptible to the antimicrobial agents
than Gram-positive bacteria (Kaushik et al. 2015). Disclosure statement
The most susceptible bacteria for the EtOH extract were S.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
aureus, M. luteus, S. enteritidis, S. epidermidis, P. aeruginosa and
B. subtilis with a rapport MBC/MIC values of 2, 2.01, 1.93, 2 and
2, respectively. Funding
These results are of great importance, particularly in the case
of S. aureus which is well-known for being resistant to a number This research was supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher
of antibiotics and for the production of several types of entero- Education and Scientific Research via Sfax University.
toxins that cause many enteritis types and septicemia (Kaushik
et al. 2015). P. aeruginosa is a naturally resistant Gram-negative
bacteria that causes various infections in humans, and is rather References
insusceptible to herbal extracts (Kukric et al. 2012). Interestingly, Abdel-Wahhab MA, Said A, Huefner A. 2005. NMR and radical scavenging
EtOH extract showed antibacterial activity against these bacteria. activities of patuletin from Urtica urens against aflatoxin B1. Pharm Biol.
These results are in agreement with the report of Steenkamp 43:515–525.
Abu-Reidah IM, Arraez-Roman D, Segura-Carretero A, Fernandez-Gutierrez
et al. (2004) who confirmed that the aqueous extract have no A. 2013. Extensive characterisation of bioactive phenolic constituents from
activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) by HPLC-DAD-ESI-QTOF-MS.
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at concentration of Food Chem. 141:2269–2277.
100 lg/mL. However, they reported no inhibitory activity. Adamski R, Bieganska J. 1980. Studies of chemical substances present in
Moreover, according to Kaushik et al. (2015) WA extract of Urtica dioica leaves. Part I, Trace element. Herba Polonica. 26:177–180.
Agati G, Azzarello E, Pollastri S, Tattini M. 2012. Flavonoids as antioxidants
Urtica urens did not show any activity against the three tested in plants: location and functional significance. Plant Sci. 196:67–76.
microorganisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, Arts MJTJ, Sebastiaan Dallinga J, Voss HP, Haenen GRMM, Bast A. 2004. A
Escherichia coli). new approach to assess the total antioxidant capacity using the TEAC
The antibacterial activity of EtOH extract of Urtica urens were assay. Food Chem. 88:567–570.
Ataa S, Wafaa E, Youssry A. 1995. Flavonoids of Urtica urens L. and bio-
apparently related to its terpenes and flavonoids type compo- logical evaluation. Egypt J Pharm Sci. 36:415–427.
nents, respectively, since phytochemical analysis revealed that Benkeblia N. 2004. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil extracts of various
these extracts had violet and yellow-orange spots indicating pos- onions (Allium cepa) and garlic (Allium sativum). LWT-Food Sci Technol.
sible presence of triterpenes and flavonoids, respectively. These 37:263–268.
results support the fact that Urtica urens, investigated in this Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. 1999. Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: direct
measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified ver-
study, also displayed antibacterial activity. sion for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascor-
Valuable plant source of vitamins is common nettle which is bic acid concentration. Methods Enzymol. 299:15–27.
used in traditional and officinal medicine as haemostatic and Canillac N, Mourey A. 2001. Antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Picea
vitamin substances (Dar et al. 2013). The nettle leaves are utilized excelsa on Listeria, Staphylococcus aureus and coliform bacteria. Food
Microbiol. 18:261–268.
mostly for the preparation of infusions. Nettle leaves contain
Cheung LM, Cheung PCK, Ooi VEC. 2003. Antioxidant activity and total
ascorbic acid (270 mg/100 g), carotenoids (50 mg/100 g), vitamins phenolics of edible mushroom extracts. Food Chem. 81:249–255.
B, D (200 mg/100 g) and E. Chung YC, Chien CT, Teng KY, Chou ST. 2006. Antioxidative and muta-
It was established that leaves and aqueous extract of Urtica genic properties of Zanthoxylum ailanthoides Sieb & Zucc. Food Chem.
dioica contain 36.402 ± 0.017 mg/100 g and 0.032 ± 0.001 mg/100 g 97:418–425.
Correa SC, Rezznde ML, Ferreira EB, Azevedo L. 2013. Marolo (Annona cras-
of vitamin C, respectively (Tatyana & Valentina 2013). According siflora Mart.): a study of value chain and processing. Food Sci Technol
to Daovy (2009), Urtica is a crucial source of vitamin C (20 to Campinas. 33:362–368.
60 mg/100 g), vitamins B1, B2, B5, B9, E and D. From our results, Daovy A. 2009. L’ortie dioïque. Actualities Pharmaceutiques. 490:53–55.
PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY 781
Dar SA, Ganai FA, Yousuf AR, Balkhi MU, Bhat TM, Sharma P. 2013. Nassiri-Asl M, Zamansoltani F, Abbasi E, Daneshi MM, Zangivand AA. 2009.
Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of Urtica dioica L. Pharm Effects of Urtica dioica extract on lipid profile in hypercholesterolemic
Biol. 51:170–180. rats. J Chin Integr Med. 7:428–433.
Diao WR, Hua QP, Zhang H, Xu JG. 2014. Chemical composition, antibac- Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999.
terial activity and mechanism of action of essential oil from seeds of fennel Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decoloriza-
(Foeniculum vulgare Mill). Food Control. 35:109–116. tion assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 26:1231–1237.
Duh PD. 1998. Antioxidant activity of Burdock (Arctium lappa Linne): its Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. 1996. Structure-antioxidant activity
scavenging effect on free-radical and active oxygen. J Am Oil Chem Soc. relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med.
75:455–461. 20:933–956.
Guil-Guerrero JL, Rebolloso-Fuentes MM, Torija-Isasa ME. 2003. Fatty acids Saad H, Bouhtoury FC, Pizzi A, Rode K, Charrier B, Ayed N. 2012.
and carotenoids from stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L). J Food Compos Characterization of pomegranate peels tannin extractives. Ind Crop Prod.
Anal. 16:111–119. 40:239–246.
Gulcin I, Kufrevioglu OI, Oktay M, Buyukokuroglu ME. 2004. Antioxidant, Schlesier K, Harwat M, B€ ohm V, Bitsch R. 2002. Assessment of antioxi-
antimicrobial, antiulcer and analgesic activities of nettle (Urtica dioica L.). dant activity by using different in vitro methods. Free Radic Res.
J Ethnopharmacol. 90:205–215. 36:177–187.
Hughes RE, Ellery P, Harry T, Jenkins V, Jones E. 1980. The dietary potential Shon MY, Kim TH, Sung NJ. 2003. Antioxidants and free radical scavenging
of the common nettle. J Sci Food Agric. 31:1279–1286. activity of Phellinus baumii (Phellinus of Hymenochaetoceae) extracts.
Jacques-Silva MC, Nogueira CW, Broch LC, Flores EM, Rocha JB. 2001. Food Chem. 82:593–597.
Diphenyl diselenide and ascorbic acid changes deposition of selenium and Sidaoui F, Belghith Igueld S, Barth D, Trabelsi-Ayadi M, Cherif JK. 2015.
ascorbic acid in liver and brain of mice. Pharmacol Toxicol. 88:119–125. Study of Tunisian nettle leaves (Urtica dioica L.): mineral composition and
Katsanidis E, Addis PB. 1999. Novel HPLC analysis of tocopherols, tocotrie- antioxidant capacity of their extracts obtained by maceration and super-
nols, and cholesterol in tissue. Free Radic Biol Med. 7:1137–11340. critical fluid extraction. Ijppr. 7:707–713.
Kaushik A, Aron A, Mihreteab S, Mohamedkassm N, Michael Kidane E. Siddhuraju P, Becker K. 2007. The antioxidant and free radical scavenging
2015. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of medicinal activities of processed cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) seed extracts.
plants used by eritrean traditional healers. World J Pharm Res. 4:501–509. Food Chem. 101:10–19.
Kirby AJ, Schmidt RJ. 1997. The antioxidant activity of Chinese herbs for Singleton VL, Rossi JA. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phos-
eczema and of placebo herbs-I. J Ethnopharmacol. 56:103–108. phomolybdic phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic.
Koleva II, van Beek TA, Linssen JPH, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN. 2002. 16:144–158.
Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on Steenkamp V, Mathivha E, Gouws MC, van Rensburg CE. 2004. Studies on
three testing methods. Phytochem Anal. 13:18–17. antibacterial, antioxidant and fibroblast growth stimulation of wound heal-
Kukric ZZ, Topalic-Trivunovic LN, Kukavica BM, Matos SB, Pavicic SS, ing remedies from South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol. 95:353–357.
Boroja MM, Savic AV. 2012. Characterization of antioxidant and anti- Tatyana AS, Valentina OR. 2013. Leaves of common nettle (Urtica dioica L.)
microbial activities of nettle leaves (Urtica dioica L.). Apteff. 43:259–272. as a source of ascorbic acid (vitamin C). World Appl Sci J. 28:250–253.
Kulisic T, Radonic A, Katalinic V, Milos M. 2004. Use of different methods Testai L, Chericoni S, Calderone V, Nencioni G, Nieri P, Morelli I,
for testing antioxidative activity of oregano essential oil. Food Chem. Martinotti E. 2002. Cardiovascular effects of Urtica dioica L. (Urticaceae)
85:633–640. roots extracts: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies. J
Leonti M. 2012. The co-evolutionary perspective of the food-medicine con- Ethnopharmacol. 81:105–109.
tinuum and wild gathered and cultivated vegetables. Genet Resour Crop Upton R. 2013. Stinging nettles leaf (Urtica dioica L.): extraordinary vegetable
Evol. 59:1295–1302. medicine. J Herb Med. 3:39–38.
Lombardo S, Pandino G, Mauromicale G, Kn€ odler M, Carle R, Schieber A. Vanden Berghe DA, Vlietinck AJ. 1991. Screening methods for antibacter-
2010. Influence of genotype, harvest time and plant part on polyphenolic ial and antiviral agents from higher plants. Meth Plant Biochem.
composition of globe artichoke [Cynara cardunculus L. var. scolymus (L.) 6:47–68.
Fiori]. Food Chem. 119:1175–1181. Venkatachalam U, Muthukrishnan S. 2012. Free radical scavenging activity of
Manu Kumar HM, Prathima VR, Sowmya S, Thribhuvan KR. 2013. Study of ethanolic extract of Desmodium gangeticum. J Acute Med. 2:36–42.
nutritional quality, phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activities Wang M, Simon JE, Aviles IF, He K, Zheng QY, Tadmor Y. 2003. Analysis
by different solvents of nettle (Urtica urens) from madikeri-karnataka of antioxidative phenolic compounds in artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). J
state. Int Res J Pharm App Sci. 3:112–119. Agric Food Chem. 51:601–608.
Matsushige K, Basnel P, Kadola S, Namba T. 1996. Potent free radicals scav- Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. 1999. The determination of flavonoids
enging of dicaffeoyl quinic acid derivatives from propolis. J Trad Med. contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals.
13:217–228. Food Chem. 64:555–559.