Hisam - AAGSB - Managerial Economics Final Exam - Group Code - March2022
Hisam - AAGSB - Managerial Economics Final Exam - Group Code - March2022
Hisam - AAGSB - Managerial Economics Final Exam - Group Code - March2022
Group Code:
Date of submission:
Question 1:
1. Read the following statement and answer the question that follows. "Cell phones
have quickly become taken as much for granted as electricity or water supply. They have
had a major impact on our lives and the way that we perform everyday tasks. Many of
these changes are apparent, while others we may not even be aware of. People
nowadays really don’t remember quite well how life was before cell phones existed!"
Use the demand-supply model to illustrate the changes in the market for cell phones
over the last twenty years. Try as much as possible to relate the demand-side factors
and the supply-side factors we studied in class to the market under study. Although
drawing graphs is not necessarily required, yet it could help you to illustrate your
answer. Support your answer with relevant real-life data.
Solution of Question 1:
The Cellphone Revolution and Digital Inequality: Scope, Determinants and
Consequences
In the 21st century, the digital economy is one of the most important drivers of global
economic growth and innovation. Infrastructure, hardware and software that enable the
rapid transmission of large amounts of information between people
Digital technologies have transformed the global economy. By one estimate, digital
technology – infrastructure, hardware and software that enable the rapid transmission
of large amounts of information between people, businesses, devices, networks and
systems – contributes US$3 trillion [£2.3 trillion] to the global economy.¹ The rise of the
global digital economy has been fast and furious over the span of three decades.
Integral to its penetration of low-income countries has been the mobile phone
revolution.
Mobile technology and wireless networks have enabled businesses and consumers in
emerging markets to leapfrog underdeveloped fixed-line infrastructure and limited
computer access to connect digitally. This has been a boon for billions of end-users, as
the mobile phone has become the most accessible, ubiquitous and functional
information and communication technology (ICT) in history.
However, even as handset and mobile costs have dropped precipitously, this gateway to
the digital economy remains closed to many.
One of the most important determinants of SIM use is mobile phone ownership. While
in theory a SIM card alone unlocks mobile communications and value-added services,
opening the door to digital inclusion, the reality is far different. Not possessing one’s
own phone represents a significant barrier to use.²⁹ It restricts when and how much
individuals can use a phone, as non-owners are dependent on others making their
phones available. It compromises privacy, as non-owners often have to use the phone in
front of those they borrow it from. It leaves borrowers vulnerable to phone
gatekeepers, who may mediate information access,³⁰ and also leverage information
asymmetries to exploit the non-owners
On the demand side, one of the most powerful sources of digital inclusion is individuals’
disposable income to buy a phone and consume value-added services. Preferences,
tastes and other cognitive considerations are also important and require further
discussion.
As noted, the costs of mobile handsets and service have dropped dramatically over the
past two decades. This has exponentially increased ownership and access. But costs still
represent a formidable barrier for many. Income constraints affect demand on every
branch of the mobile digital economy: buying a handset; using a handset and value-
added services, especially mobile money; smartphone migration; and internet use.
Across multiple surveys in low- and medium-income countries, lack of disposable
income is reported as the dominant factor constraining mobile phone use. For example,
in accounting for the gender gap in phone ownership, the Connected Women
programme found that cost is the primary reason women report not owning a phone;
this factor largely trumps other potential barriers, such as perceived value of phone use,
family constraints, agent trust and access, and technical literacy.⁹¹ Similarly in the FII
surveys, most respondents (men and women) report that – more than any other factor
– the high prices of smartphones keep them out of reach
Gender
Early research on the digital divide along gender lines attributed it to economic
inequality, such
as women’s lower levels of employment, education and income
Age
A fourth important social determinant of digital inequality is age. Across most countries
in the world, smartphone and internet use is significantly lower among older
generations
One significant constraint in access and usage is the degree of turnover in SIM
registration and handset ownership. Large tracking surveys have done a great service in
exposing the large and important gaps in ownership, but, as they generally only provide
a static, discrete picture of phone ownership and use, they have failed to spotlight the
problem of turnover. This phenomenon points to the importance of more rigorous and
dynamic methodologies in tracking the pathway from mobile phone access to
ownership to usage – an important policy implication itself.
Aker, JC and Mbiti, IM. ‘Mobile phones and economic development in Africa’. Journal of
Economic Perspectives 24, no. 3: 207-32, 2010.
Armanasco, A et al. ‘Preventive health behavior change text message interventions: A
meta-analysis’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52, no. 3 (2017): 391-402.
Barboni, G. et al. A tough call: Understanding barriers to and impacts of women’s mobile
phone adoption in India, Harvard Kennedy School, Evidence for Policy Design, October
2018.
Buys, P et al. ‘Determinants of a digital divide in Sub-Saharan Africa: A spatial
econometric analysis of cell phone coverage’. World Development 37(9), 1494-1505,
2009.
Cole-Lewis, H and Kershaw, T. ‘Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease
prevention and management’. Epidemiologic Reviews 32, no. 1: 56-69, 2010.
Croxson, H and Rowntree, O. Triggering Mobile Internet Use Among Men and Women
in South