2007 - NJP. One Path To Acoustic Cloaking
2007 - NJP. One Path To Acoustic Cloaking
2007 - NJP. One Path To Acoustic Cloaking
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/9/3/045)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 146.164.138.48
This content was downloaded on 07/02/2015 at 04:08
The transformation-based solutions to the Maxwell equations reported by Pendry et al [1] yield a
general method for rendering arbitrarily sized and shaped objects electromagnetically invisible.
Other approaches for almost eliminating electromagnetic scattering in all directions from certain
classes of objects of limited size have been described [2]–[4], and Leonhardt [5, 6] has given a
recipe that can cloak an object in the short wavelength limit that thus applies to different classes
of waves, including electromagnetic and acoustic. Similar transformation-based approaches have
been analysed for the related problem of electrical impedance tomography [7, 8]. The solution
found by Pendry et al stands out for its theoretically perfect performance regardless of wavelength
and object size and shape.
It is undoubtedly of interest whether the transformation-based electromagnetic solutions,
which were simulated in [9] and experimentally confirmed in [10], can be extended to waves
in other systems. From one perspective, it seems that the answer could be yes. The concepts of
wavevector, wave impedance, and power flow are universal, and the manner in which permittivity
1
Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
∂v
ρ0 = −∇p, (1)
∂t
∂p
= −λ∇ · v, (2)
∂t
where p is scalar pressure, v is vector fluid velocity, ρ0 is the unperturbed fluid mass density, and
λ is the fluid bulk modulus. This set of equations admits the usual compressional wave solutions
in which fluid motion is parallel to the wavevector. Milton et al [11] showed that any coordinate
transformation on an elastic medium produces an anisotropic mass represented by a second rank
tensor. In cylindrical coordinates with z invariance, and letting the mass density be anisotropic
but diagonal in these coordinates, the time harmonic acoustic equations of state simplify to (the
exp (+jωt) convention is used throughout)
1 ∂p
jωρφ vφ = − , (3)
r ∂φ
∂p
jωρr vr = − , (4)
∂r
1 1 ∂(rvr ) 1 ∂vφ
jω p = − − . (5)
λ r ∂r r ∂φ
Now consider the z-invariant 2D Maxwell equations for transverse electric (TE) polarization in
cylindrical coordinates with anisotropic but diagonal permittivity and permeability tensors
1 ∂(−Ez )
jωµr (−Hr ) = − , (6)
r ∂φ
New Journal of Physics 9 (2007) 45 (http://www.njp.org/)
3 DEUTSCHE PHYSIKALISCHE GESELLSCHAFT
∂(−Ez )
jωµφ Hφ = − , (7)
∂r
1 ∂(rHφ ) 1 ∂(−Hr )
jωz (−Ez ) = − − . (8)
r ∂r r ∂φ
The above equations have been arranged to highlight the exact duality between these two sets of
equations under the variable exchange
The boundary conditions are also preserved under this exchange. At a fluid–fluid interface, p and
the normal velocity component are continuous, while at an electromagnetic material interface,
Ez and the tangential H component are continuous. Thus at a material discontinuity in radius,
p and vr are continuous, which are equivalent to Ez and Hφ under this replacement, which in
turn are the electromagnetic quantities that must be continuous. Consequently, a solution to
the 2D cylindrical Maxwell equations above is also a solution to the 2D acoustic equations
under the above replacement. This further implies that any transformation-based medium [1] for
electromagnetics, when restricted to 2D and normal incidence, can also be realized acoustically.
To demonstrate this, we consider the cloaking shell described in [1]. This exact equivalence
implies that a cylindrical shell containing specific spatial distributions of mass density and bulk
modulus can smoothly bend any incident wavefield around the centre of the shell with essentially
zero scattering in any direction, including the forward direction. For a 2D acoustic cloak, the
required relative mass density elements and bulk modulus are thus [9]
2
r r − R1 −1 R2 r − R1
ρr = , ρφ = , λ = , (10)
r − R1 r R2 − R1 r
where R1 is the radius of the cloaked region and R2 is the outer edge of the cloaking shell. These
values are relative to the bulk modulus and mass density of the fluid outside the shell.
This equivalence implies that the 2D electromagnetic simulations of plane wave interaction
with a cloaking shell presented in [9] are also solutions to the analogous acoustic cloaking
problems. But, in order to independently and unambiguously demonstrate the validity of this
acoustic cloaking approach, a time harmonic 2D cartesian grid finite difference code was written
and used to solve the acoustic equations (1) and (2) with an anisotropic mass tensor. Note that the
mass density tensor is not diagonal in cartesian coordinates, and the off-diagonal elements are
included in the formulation. The computational domain is shown in figure 1, in which a gaussian
beam is launched towards an incompressible cylinder 1.5 wavelengths in diameter. All simulation
quantities (excitation frequency, bulk modulus and background fluid density) are normalized to
unity, and all domain boundaries are perfectly matched layers to prevent reflections.
Figure 2 shows the simulated pressure field for three scenarios. The left panel shows the
baseline pressure field with no scatterer. The middle panel shows the pressure field with the
uncloaked scatterer, in which strong scattering in all directions is clear, especially the forward
direction which produces the shadow region. In contrast, when a 0.75 wavelength thick cloaking
shell specified by (10) is placed around the rigid scatterer, the incident wave is smoothly directed
around the scatterer with significantly reduced scattering in all directions. 2D acoustic cloaking
is thus realizable in an exact analogue to the electromagnetic equivalent.
New Journal of Physics 9 (2007) 45 (http://www.njp.org/)
4 DEUTSCHE PHYSIKALISCHE GESELLSCHAFT
Figure 2. Left panel: The acoustic pressure p in the absence of a scatterer. Middle:
The acoustic pressure with an incompressible cylindrical scatterer. Right panel:
The acoustic pressure with the same scatterer surrounded by the cloaking shell
described in the text.
Some scattering is seen which we attribute to numerical artifacts associated with the cartesian
grid approximation of circular surfaces and to the relatively coarse grid used to compute these
solutions (20 grid points per wavelength). Although more exact cloaking has been simulated
numerically using a conformal triangular mesh [9], clear and effective cloaking performance
can also be achieved on a much simpler grid. This confirms the general insensitivity of the ideal
cloaking solution to material and geometric imperfections reported in [9], and also suggests that
effective cloaks (either electromagnetic or acoustic) could be designed based on a square grid,
rather than a conformal one such as that used in [10], which may be simpler to fabricate.
Although anisotropic fluid mass is not a property of ordinary fluids, there is hope for an
experimental realization of this idea. Milton et al [11] describes conceptually how it can be
achieved with spring loaded masses in a manner essentially equivalent to how self resonant
electromagnetic metamaterial structures can be used to achieve anisotropic electromagnetic
permittivity or permeability of almost any value [14]. Acoustic cloaking realized in this way
will consequently be of limited bandwidth.
where p is the pressure and v is the fluid velocity. We further assume that neither the
transformation matrix nor the material property tensors mix x–y coordinates with z so that
the transformation matrix has the following form
1 1 1 2 0
(i i ) = 2 1 2 2 0 . (13)
0 0 3 3
In this case, we can show that elastic fluid wave equations (1) and (2), when placed in time
harmonic form, are isomorphic with the Maxwell curl equations
∇ × E + jωB = 0, (14)
∇ × H − jωD = 0, (15)
Note that the Poynting vector S = E × H = pv correctly represents power flow in both systems.
Making the above substitutions into (14) yields
∇p × ẑ + p∇ × ẑ + jω (ρv)×ẑ = 0, (18)
which reduces to (1) since ẑ is a constant, and neither ∇p nor ρv have z-components. Following
the same procedure with (15) yields
and in component form for the primed and unprimed coordinate system
i j 3 ρj k k p vp = det ()−1 i i m m µim m n 3 n q vq . (25)
Solving (21) and (25) we find the general transformation for the density
ρi j = det ()−1 (i k 3 k k ki3 )(j l 3 l l lj3 ) ρij . (26)
which reduces to
λ−1 = ε33 .
and
since ε is also a tensor density of weight +1. From the form of the transformation matrix (13)
we find that the general transformation for the bulk modulus is
λ = det ()−2
3 3 λ. (29)
Through the above procedure, the 2D acoustic wave has been placed in exact correspondence
with one polarization (TE, although it could also have been transverse magnetic) of the 3D
electromagnetic equations. A more general equivalence is not possible for acoustics because we
need three field variable components for correspondence with each electromagnetic polarization,
and a fluid provides only four total with the velocity vector and the scalar pressure. Even if we
consider a more general elastic medium in which strain is anisotropic, an exact correspondence
to electromagnetics in 3D is not possible as can be seen by examining the energy density, u. For
isotropic and anisotropic elastic waves we have respectively
1 1
u = λσii σkk + ρmn vm vn , (30)
2 2
1 1
u = cijkl σij σkl + ρmn vm vn , (31)
2 2
neither of which is isomorphic with the electromagnetic energy expression
1 1
u = εij Ei Ej + µkl Hk Hl . (32)
2 2
There may be more special cases of electromagnetic and elastodynamic equivalence, but as
shown in [11] and above, a general 3D equivalence is not possible.
In summary, we have shown that the exact equivalence in 2D between fluid acoustics
and single polarization electromagnetics holds for anisotropic materials. This anisotropic
isomorphism enables all classes of 2D transformation-based solutions of the Maxwell equations
to be realized acoustically as well, including the cloaking solution first described in [1]. It was
shown numerically that a fluid with an inhomogeneous bulk modulus and with an anisotropic
(but diagonal in cylindrical coordinates) and inhomogeneous mass density can smoothly and
reflectionlessly direct compressional acoustic waves around a strong scatterer. Engineering a
material shell to have the required properties may be a challenge, but it is experimentally feasible
in principle.
References