Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Chromosome Translocations and Cancer

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

5/30/2019

Human Chromosome Translocations and Cancer


By: Clare O'Connor, Ph.D. (Biology Department, Boston College) © 2008 Nature Education
Citation: O'Connor, C. (2008) Human chromosome translocations and
cancer. Nature Education 1(1):56

Translocations generate novel chromosomes, but are often linked to disorders like infertility
and cancer. How do these new chromosomes generate problems, and how are they
detected?

Translocations generate novel chromosomes. In a translocation, a segment from one chromosome is


transferred to a nonhomologous chromosome or to a new site on the same chromosome. Translocations place
genes in new linkage relationships and generate chromosomes without normal pairing partners. When
scientists compare the genomes of closely related species, they can see that translocations have occurred
many times during the course of evolution. However, translocations that give an organism an adaptive
advantage are very rare. Translocations are more often associated with negative consequences such as
aneuploidy, infertility, or cancer. Scientists are now able to use molecular probes to analyze translocations,
and the results are providing new insights into the molecular origins of various diseases, including cancer.

Translocations Generate Novel Chromosomes


Translocations were first detected cytologically in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as novel
chromosomes that appeared prominently in tumor cells. Some of the earliest, most complete descriptions of
tumor cell chromosomes were provided by the great German cytologist Theodor Boveri, considered by many
to be first cancer geneticist. Based on his observations of tumors, Boveri postulated that tumor cells
possessed "growth-stimulatory chromosomes" that played a role in malignancy (Balmain, 2001). At the time,
cytological markers were not available for human chromosomes, so Boveri was not able to identify specific
chromosomal changes in tumors. Today, we know that Boveri's insights were correct. Translocations are
indeed common in cancer cells, and some translocations produce oncogenes that are responsible for
malignant transformation.

With the development of genetic and cytological models in the early twentieth century, the existence of
translocations became firmly established. Geneticists had discovered that genes were physically linked on
chromosomes, and that the strength of genetic linkage could be used to provide a rough map of each
chromosome. Occasionally, however, geneticists discovered mutations in which genes from two different
chromosomes behaved as if they were physically linked. Furthermore, the number of these mutations could be
increased by orders of magnitude when organisms were treated with X-rays. Examination of these organisms'
chromosomes provided an explanation for the appearance of novel linkage groups; specifically, new
chromosomes had appeared, and existing chromosomes had been altered. Moreover, in organisms like
Drosophila and maize, for which cytological markers were available, scientists observed that the novel
chromosomes contained parts of normal chromosomes. Thus, they were able to infer that breaks had
occurred in normal chromosomes, and that the broken ends of nonhomologous chromosomes had fused
together, producing translocations.

These early observations provided the foundation for our modern understanding of translocations. We now
appreciate that translocations require double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA at two locations. The frequency of
these DSBs is greatly increased by ionizing radiation, which is still used experimentally to generate
translocations. Cells are not tolerant of DSBs; these breaks cause cells to arrest in mitosis or to undergo
apoptosis. Therefore, the appearance of DSBs activates the cellular DNA repair machinery that catalyzes the

1/5
5/30/2019

joining of broken chromosome ends (Lieber et al., 2003). A variety of rearrangements can result from this
joining. For instance, precise joining of broken ends can regenerate a normal chromosome. Deletions,
duplications, and inversions can occur when joining involves two broken ends on the same chromosome.
Furthermore, translocations may occur when the broken ends of two nonhomologous chromosomes are joined
together. Nonhomologous end joining is often imprecise, so some nucleotides may be lost altogether during
the joining process.

Karyotypes Are Used to Classify Translocations


Translocations involving human chromosomes are of
great clinical interest because they have been linked
to a number of disorders, including mental retardation,
infertility, and cancer. Translocations are usually
detected when a cytogeneticist examines a karyotype,
which is an ordered arrangement of an individual's
metaphase chromosomes. In standard karyotypes,
chromosomes that have been stained with Giemsa
dye after a special treatment reveal a characteristic set
of bands along their length. Translocations are thus
manifested as a change in the length or the banding
pattern of a chromosome arm. Over time,
cytogeneticists have discovered hundreds, if not
thousands, of different human translocations. To
describe these rearrangements, cytogeneticists have
developed a standardized nomenclature that allows
investigators to narrow in on chromosomal regions
that are affected by translocations.

Nonreciprocal translocations are one-way


translocations in which a chromosomal segment is
transferred to a nonhomologous chromosome.
Reciprocal translocations, on the other hand, involve Figure 1: Chromosome translocations.
the exchange of segments from two nonhomologous
a) An idiogram of a reciprocal translocation
chromosomes. If no genetic material is lost during the
between chromosomes 12 and 17. b) An
exchange, the translocation is considered to be a
ideogram of a Robertsonian translocation
balanced translocation. An example of a balanced
between chromosomes 14 and 21.
reciprocal translocation is shown in the idiograms in
© 2002 Nature Publishing Group Braude, P. et al.
Figure 1a, which depicts a reciprocal translocation that
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:
has occurred between chromosome 12 (orange) and
(12) 941-953, doi:10.1038/nrg953 (2002). All rights reserved.
chromosome 17 (blue). The arrows in the figure
indicate the position of the breakpoints on each
chromosome. This particular translocation would be designated as t(12;17)(p13.1;p13), where "t" indicates
that a translocation has occurred. The first set of parentheses identifies the two chromosomes involved in the
translocation, and the second set of parentheses indicates the breakpoints on the chromosome arms. Thus,
this particular translocation involved region p13.1 of chromosome 12 and region p13 of chromosome 17. The
rearranged chromosomes that result from a translocation are referred to as derivative (der) chromosomes. In
this particular translocation, the rearranged chromosome is referred to as der(12) t(12;17), because the
centromere of the derivative chromosome is derived from chromosome 12.

2/5
5/30/2019

Yet another category of translocations is Robertsonian translocations (Figure 1b), in which the long q arms of
two acrocentric chromosomes become joined at a single centromere. Chromosome p arms are lost during
Robertsonian translocations, but because acrocentric chromosomes have very short p arms that are repetitive,
there are no phenotypic consequences. Figure 1b depicts a Robertsonian translocation between
chromosomes 14 and 21 that has generated the derivative chromosome der(14; 21). This particular
translocation is interesting because it is commonly observed in patients with the familial form of Down
syndrome. Familial Down syndrome is much less common than the form in which patients have 47
chromosomes due to the presence of an extra full copy of chromosome 21. Patients with familial Down
syndrome have 46 chromosomes, including two normal copies of chromosome 21 and a Robertsonian
translocation with chromosome 21 material. Familial Down patients usually inherit the translocation
chromosome from an unaffected parent, who has only 45 chromosomes, including the Robertsonian
chromosome and one normal copy of chromosome 21.

Investigators Use Multi-Color FISH to Scan for Translocations


Today, multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or spectral karyotyping, is
often used to screen patient samples for translocations because this method provides
a sensitive genome-wide overview of an individual's chromosomes. Spectral
karyotyping is particularly useful for cancer diagnoses, because transformed cells Figure 2
often have multiple chromosomal rearrangements. In spectral karyotyping,
chromosomes are hybridized with a mixture of fluorescent DNA probes that generate
a discrete spectral signal for each chromosome. When metaphase cells are hybridized
with these probes, normal chromosomes appear uniformly colored along their lengths, while translocation
chromosomes show more than one color along their lengths.

Figure 2 shows an example of a spectral karyotype prepared from acute myeloid leukemia cells with multiple
translocations, which are indicated by arrows. The image obtained in the microscope (Figure 2a) was
processed by a computer to generate a false-color image (Figure 2b) that depicts each chromosome in a
distinctive color. The chromosomes were then arranged into a karyotype. Figure 2c shows portions of the
karyotype in which translocation chromosomes were placed next to their normal homologues. At least 30
rearrangements were observed in this cell, and some of the chromosomes underwent multiple translocations.

Spectral karyotypes lack the spatial detail of Giemsa-stained karyotypes, so it is not possible to define the
translocation breakpoints. Nonetheless, FISH is useful because it can reveal small translocations that would
not be possible to detect with banding.

Translocation Carriers Face Reproductive Issues

Balanced translocations may be undetected in individuals who carry them as long as


the total amount of genetic material has not been changed by the translocations and
the translocations have not altered normal gene function. Problems arise during
meiosis, however, because the translocation chromosomes are partially homologous
to two different chromosomes. For example, Figure 3 diagrams the meiotic divisions in
an individual who carries a balanced reciprocal translocation. During prophase I, a
cross-like structure forms to allow synapsis and crossing over. Then, when the cells
enter anaphase I, there are three possible ways that the chromosomes can segregate.
(Each of the daughter cells must receive a "red" centromere and a "blue" centromere.) Figure 3
If the chromosomes separate by adjacent-1 or adjacent-2 segregation, the daughter
Figure Detail
cells receive two chromosomes that were "adjacent" to each other in the prophase

3/5
5/30/2019

configuration. These gametes are aneuploid, with an excess of some genes and
deficiencies in others. Only alternate segregation produces euploid gametes, which contain either both
translocation products or two normal chromosomes. Statistically, aneuploid gametes should outnumber
euploid gametes, so translocation carriers have an elevated risk of having children with mental retardation and
other birth defects linked to aneuploidy. If the aneuploidies are severe enough to cause embryonic lethality,
translocation carriers may also appear to have problems with fertility.

Translocations Can Produce Oncogenes


Depending on the chromosome breakpoints, a
translocation can result in the disruption or
misregulation of normal gene function. These
molecular rearrangements, in many cases, are
considered to be the primary cause of various
cancers. Indeed, over the past few decades, clinical
cytogeneticists have been able to link specific Figure 4: The consequences of recurring
chromosome breakpoints to clinically defined cancers, chromosome translocations.
including subtypes of leukemias, lymphomas, and a) In some lymphomas and leukemias,
sarcomas. Virtually all of the translocations observed chromosome translocations lead to the
in tumors have arisen through somatic mutations, so juxtaposition of promoter/enhancer elements
these are not inherited in families. from one gene (gene A, purple) with the intact
coding region of another gene (gene B, red). b)
Analyses of the DNA sequences surrounding many of By contrast, translocations seen in CML and
these translocation breakpoints have provided many of the acute leukemias result in
important mechanistic insights into cancer. Figure 4 recombination of the coding regions of two
outlines two kinds of molecular rearrangements that different genes. This results in a fusion protein
have frequently been linked to malignant that might have a new function. This is the case
transformation. In Figure 4a, the translocation places for the BCR-ABL fusion protein that is encoded
the coding sequence of one gene (Gene B) in by the Philadelphia chromosome.
proximity to the regulatory sequence for a different © 2001 Nature Publishing Group Rowley, J. D.
gene (Gene A). The first translocation of this kind to be Chromosome translocations: dangerous liaisons revisited.
described was a translocation involving chromosomes Nature Reviews Cancer 1, 247 (2001). All rights reserved.
8 and 14 in patients with Burkitt's lymphoma. This
particular translocation places the MYC proto-oncogene
from chromosome 8 under the control of the powerful immunoglobin heavy chain gene (IGH) promoter on
chromosome 14. The MYC protein normally signals for cell proliferation, and the translocation causes high
levels of MYC overexpression in lymphoid cells, where the IGH promoter is normally active.

In other cancers, translocations fuse the coding sequences of two genes together to generate potent
oncogenes (Figure 4b). An example of historic interest is the Philadelphia chromosome, which was initially
identified as a minute, or unusually small, chromosome in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).
With the advent of chromosome banding techniques, Janet Rowley was able to show that the Philadelphia
chromosome was actually a product of a reciprocal translocation involving small segments at the ends of the q
arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 (Rowley, 1973). Subsequent molecular analyses involving multiple
laboratories revealed that the translocation fused the coding sequence of the BCR (breakpoint cluster region)
gene on chromosome 22 with the coding sequence of the ABL gene on chromosome 9. The BCR-ABL fusion
protein encoded by the chimeric gene is a protein tyrosine kinase that constitutively activates signaling
pathways involved in cell growth and proliferation. Knowledge of this particular breakpoint has led to a
successful treatment for CML, because investigators were able to use the sequence information to

4/5
5/30/2019

overexpress and crystallize the BCR-ABL protein, which in turn led to the development of drugs that inhibit this
protein's activity.

Hundreds of translocations have now been linked to cancer, and this information has been catalogued and is
freely available online to cytogeneticists. The database continues to grow as investigators uncover new links
between genes, chromosomes, and cancer. It is interesting to consider that approximately one century has
elapsed since Theodor Boveri predicted that growth-stimulatory chromosomes were present in cancer cells.
Scientists continue to identify new molecular rearrangements that occur in cancer, with the hope that this
information will translate into new treatments for a devastating disease.

References and Recommended Reading

Balmain, A. Cancer genetics: From Boveri and Mendel to microarrays. Nature Reviews Cancer 1, 77–82 (2001) doi:10.1038/35094086 (link to
article)

Lieber, M. R., et al. Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous end-joining. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 4, 712–720 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nrm1202 (link to article)

Rowley, J. D. A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogeneous leukemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa
staining. Nature 243, 290–293 (1973) doi:10.1038/243290a0 (link to article)

———. Chromosome translocations: Dangerous liaisons revisited. Nature Reviews Cancer 1, 245–250 (2001) doi:10.1038/35106108 (link to
article)

5/5

You might also like