OM-A, Chapter 10, Security
OM-A, Chapter 10, Security
OM-A, Chapter 10, Security
10.4.1 General
Bomb threat calls against civil aviation targets must always be given careful consideration and
objective assessment in order to determine the credibility of the threat and, therefore, whether
there
is, a need for reduction of risk through the implementation of additional security counter-measures.
Bomb threats are normally anonymous telephone calls which may provide information indicating the
intention to commit an unlawful act against an aircraft. Written warnings are rare but should be
assessed using the same techniques as applied to a telephoned warning.
Bomb threats can be made against aircraft in the following operational phases:
On the ground, before boarding of passengers or crew;
On the ground, but after boarding of passengers and crew and before take-off;
After take-off and during the climb phase;
During the cruise phase of the flight;
During the descent phase of the flight;
After landing, but before passengers and crew have disembarked.
Telephone bomb warnings may be received by operator personnel either directly from the people
issuing the warning or from intermediaries (for example, press agencies). In either case, the recipient
should attempt to obtain as much information as possible about the threat in order to facilitate
assessment of the threat and identification of the person(s) issuing it.
When answering a bomb threat call which is a threat to an aircraft follow these guidelines:
Listen without interrupting the caller and without giving any usable information;
Then employ all possible tactics to prolong the conversation, notably by asking questions;
Make a note of the content of the conversation and include it in the form "Bomb Threat
Call Report";
At the end of the call, do not hang up even if the caller hangs up;
Then, using another phone, transmit the content of the call through your manager only;
Be discreet;
Keep your notes and the report.
The person who has received the call shall report as accurately as possible without delay to the
immediate manager, who will relay it to the operator security manager. For this purpose, the
recipient
shall detail the entire content of the call and, to such an extent as possible, provide all information
which he is able to gather by conforming to the instruction for the receipt of bomb threat call.
10.5.1 General
The Pilot-in-Command will be informed of threats received and subsequent security measures taken
or suggested. The Pilot-in-Command is responsible to take action upon receiving a sabotage warning
at all times. If not otherwise instructed by the operator security manager, he shall take the following
actions.
10.5.2 Airplane on Ground
The Pilot-in-Command advises the special task force of the respective airport or the local
police;
Open all possible cargo, cabin and cockpit-doors (in case of explosion);
Relief all respective systems from its pressure;
Shut off all electrical power;
No passenger, crew and other persons shall be on board an airplane with the exception of the
search team;
An airplane to be searched shall be removed to a designated remote location to minimize the
possible extent of damage in case of an explosion;
The search of the airplane shall normally be executed by the specialty trained team and/or the
competent local authorities with the co-operation of the crew and/or ground engineers;
If the search is performed by the competent authorities, it will be carried out according to
security checklist;
On stations where competent local authorities are not available, the Pilot-in-Command will
decide about further action in close coordination with the operator security manager;
Require unload hold baggage, cargo, mail, catering supplies, etc. Additional security measures
shall be implemented;
Require passengers to identify their baggage after they have been screened/ searched before
re-loading. If this is not possible, baggage will be separated and treated according to local
procedures (opening of baggage in the absence of its owner should only take place in the
presence of or by the police);
Require passengers to be screened before re-boarding.
10.5.3 Airplane In-flight
When a bomb threat is associated with an airplane in-flight and once the threat has been assessed,
the operations/ATC will contact the Pilot-in-Command to provide him with information about the
threat and actions to be taken.
On receipt of the information, the Pilot-in-Command should require a discrete search of aircraft, in
so
far as this is possible in flight.
During the flight it is the Pilot-in-Command prerogative to decide to what extent information shall be
given to passengers concerning such a threat.
If feasible with regard to other safety requirements arrange the flight in such a manner that the
cabin
altitude does not increase beyond the altitude already attained, thereby decreasing the risk of a
pressure bomb explosion.
Make a PAX announcement, that landing due to operational/technical reasons has to be made;
Declare an emergency priority for landing;
Stop climb and maintain present cabin altitude;
Advice Senior Cabin Crew of intended course of action;
Inform cabin crew members and make announcement that landing for operational reasons
have to be made;
CC prepare cabin for emergency landing;
Inform Blue Air ( directly or via ATC);
Land as soon as possible at the nearest suitable airport (check availability of fire brigade) and
flow the procedures for „airplane on ground";
If a suspected device is found on board, follow instructions for Suspected Device Found on
Board.
Make a suitable passenger announcement and requesting the passengers to remain in their
seats and to co-operate with the crew;
Perform in-flight search of the airplane according to circumstances by using security
checklists. If a search is requested from the crew, the cabin must be searched in a methodical
and organized manner following the search checklist. A systematic bomb search for a B 737
lasts 60 minutes, depending on the number of passengers;
Inform flight crew about the result of the search.
If an immediate landing is impossible and the device represents such a great hazard in its present
position that it must be moved, proceed as follows:
Contact ATC to receive authorization for route deviation and contact operator to get advice
regarding the suspect device;
Stop further climbing and maintain existing cabin altitude in order to preclude activation of an
altitude sensitive fuse bomb;
If operationally possible, reduce differential pressure to zero by descending the aircraft to
existing cabin altitude in order to avoid amplifying the effects of blast in the case of an
explosion;
Consider fuel, airplane capabilities and distance to nearest suitable airport. For the approach
lower landing gear and flaps early and assume approach speed while maintaining steady level
flight for a while, in the case of an explosion the power systems for gear and flaps could be
damaged. The above mentioned action eliminates this danger;
Cabin crew members must select appropriate "least risk" bomb location for Boeing 737 (near
aft service door);
As far as practicable disconnect all non-essential electrical power in this area In order to reduce
potential fire ignition hazard;
Reseat passengers with safety belts fastened and seatback in upright position as far as possible
away from the device;
A check should be made to ensure that the device can be moved. Slide a string or stiff card
under the suspect device without disturbing the device. This allows checking for an anti-lift
trigger which could cause the device to detonate if it were picked up. If string or card slips
easily under the device without catching on any protrusion from the device, it may be carefully
lifted. If not, the device must not be moved, but steps should be taken to limit the explosion
effects where the item is located. CDR has the responsibility of engaging such a way of action;
Move the suspect device (do not open it) in the attitude found to the appropriate "least risk"
bomb location. Secure it in the same attitude against the outside structure using adhesive
tape. Keeping it in the attitude found will preclude accidental detonation;
Stabilize it in this position without disturbing it more than necessary to prevent moving during
deceleration or landing. Cover the device with polythene (the device itself must be kept dry)
and then saturate blankets, pillows and other blast absorbent materials with water or any
noninflammable
liquid and carefully pack at least 30cm of them around the suspect device. Then
cover it with other suitable material, such as articles of clothing and baggage, preferably
wetted to reduce the risk of fire;
Land as soon as possible.
10.5.4.5 After Landing
10.5.4.6 Bomb has not been found or has been removed from the Airplane
Check for possible damage caused during the search and make a list of it;
Check whether the A/C has been released by the authorities for further flights;
Contact the Company Dispatch and inform about the status;
If panels and doors have been opened which are not included in the daily pre-flight check done
by the Pilot-in-Command, a maintenance action is required;
Check with maintenance control whether the aircraft is airworthy or not;
Before continuing a flight a release from Flight Operations is needed.
10.6 Hijacking
10.6.1 Policy
Security measures in force on the ground are intended to reduce the possibility of potential hijackers
to gain access and control of an aircraft.
It is our general policy that the flight deck door must be kept closed and locked, inaccessible for a
possible hijacker and the flight deck crew will keep control of the flight deck at all costs.
Pending on the type of hijacking, the flight crew may decide to cooperate and/or negotiate with
the hijackers demands, or land the aircraft as soon as possible at a time and place chosen by the
Pilotin-
Command. Once on the ground, it shall be the aim to keep the aircraft at the given aerodrome. The
Pilot-in-Command shall as far as possible retain his authority over crew, passenger, aircraft and load.
There are different types of hijacker(s):
Politically motivated;
In pursuit of a crime;
Mentally disturbed;
Act for private reasons;
They may be in possession of firearms, explosives, inflammable liquids or replica or simulated
weapons. They may simply claim to be in possession of weapons.
In the case of a hijacking, the safety of passengers and crew is of prime importance. If necessary, for
this reason, the demands of hijackers shall normally be complied with.
Based on history in civil aviation there are two different types of hijackings:
Classical (or traditional) hijacking: this type will primarily be politically motivated, in pursuit of
a crime, by one or more mentally disturbed persons or for private reasons. In such situation
the aircraft, the crew and the passengers will be used to apply pressure to reach a specific
target.
Hijacking at new dimensions: this second type must be expected as performed by ideologically
motivated radicals planning to use the aircraft as a weapon of mass destruction.
10.6.5 Communication
Any communication between the flight deck and the cabin shall be established by use of the
interphone.
When on ground, and possible, pilots should attract attention of emergency situation. When
situation
is desperate and intervention is required: leave flaps full down after landing or lower full flaps while
on ground. This means that an immediate, forced armed intervention is requested.
Leave aircraft alone, do not interfere. Retract flaps after landing.
Transponder shall in this case be returned to A7500 if previously set to A7700.
Pilots may transmit "aircraft call sign back to A7500" to emphasize that intervention is no longer
required.
Return to parking position and coordinate action with the ground operations personnel;
Park the airplane at all times with the tail overhead concrete, since the most common way to
approach the airplane is via the tail;
Do not inform passengers of the reasons for returning as this may aggravate a potential
hijacker to take action;
Try to establish contact with the ATC / Company Dispatch;
Especially during night time select all cabin lights BRIGHT;
Doors should be disarmed, although Elite Troops are trained to open the door in armed
position without the escape slide to deploy.
Continue the flight as planned;
Take no action which might provoke a potential hijacker into unpredicted action;
All crew members should be alerted to keep a close watch on all passengers;
No one should be allowed to enter the flight deck without prior contact via the interphone.
The flight deck door shall be locked;
Communication between flight and cabin crew shall be established via interphone.
In the case of an hijacking, the Pilot-in-Command shall as far as possible retain his authority over
crew,
passenger and airplane, it is a basic principle that the flight crew should stay with the airplane in
order
to retain as much control over the situation as possible and to transmit information to ground
operations. However, there might be situations where the Pilot-in-Command decides that the
escape
of the flight crew (or part of it) will improve the likelihood of a successful outcome and the saving of
lives.
10.6.9.1 DO NOT
Argue with hijacker(s);
Talk down to them or appear over clever;
Offer any technical advice;
Refer to insanity or mental disorders;
Engage in any conversation with political overtones;
Become mentally aligned with the hijacker(s);
Take any physical action unless hijacker(s) understand why;
Attempt to overpower the hijacker(s) (being aware there may be some who have not made
their presence known).
10.6.9.2 DO
Comply with the instructions of the hijacker(s) in so far as these are compatible with the safety
of the airplane;
Avoid discussion on politics or religion with the hijacker(s);
Maintain normality as situation allows;
Offer water and food to passengers - no alcoholic drinks should be served;
Cabin and lavatories should be kept clean;
At least one toilet should be reserved for the crew only;
Reseat lonely passengers in the cabin together;
Try to maintain communications with hijackers to increase inhibition against potential
aggression;
Ask the hijacker(s) to take decision in order to tax their energy and to avoid retribution in the
case of a suggestion by a crew member being perceived to be a trick;
Attempt to calm the hijacker(s) by exerting utmost patience;
Explain actions and operational procedures in advance;
Attempt to persuade hijacker(s) to land and release passengers.
Good coordination and communication is essential for good crew performance. Crew Resource
Management training has been designed to address these persistent challenges in performance. The
September 11 attacks present new challenges in crew coordination and communication.
The challenges are caused by a fundamental shift in the common strategy of dealing with hijack
situations: Whenever there is a disturbance in the cabin the crew needs to set priorities to protect
passengers, themselves and people on the ground from any chance of a terrorist takeover of the
flight
deck.
The best formula for crew coordination and communication under the new strategy of hijack begins
with prevention. The importance of the pre-flight briefing conducted by the Pilot-in-Command can't
be overstated. An effective briefing involves all crew members.
Security Department will add special topics if intelligence requires so. It must be made perfectly
clear,
that the Pilot-in-Command is the in-flight security coordinator and must be kept informed as quickly
and as good as possible, especially if a passenger disturbance above Level 1 is given.
Experience has shown that acronyms, slang, code words and signals can cause more trouble than
they
are worth. Plain English is the most reliable form of communication during any passenger
disturbance,
especially if a hijack is suspected.
As to the closed and locked cockpit door policy, the cabin interphone is the only mode of
communication required to be working between passenger cabin and the flight deck.
The Pilot-in-Command will convey details by means of air traffic control and company radio. Exact
details such as the following may be important to those attempting to make effective responses on
ground:
The number of hijackers, names if used and description;
Their seat location;
The nature and number of their weapons;
Their exact demands, route and destination;
Quantity of fuel on board and technical status of aircraft.
A successful outcome may depend on the correctness of those details and the speed with which
they
are delivered to the right people.
The best defensive measures are not reactive, but proactive preparation and prevention. Be aware
and pay special attention to the pre-flight briefing. If a Cabin Crew should be grabbed and held by an
aggressor it is crucial to break free.
Any intervention by a security agent, single crew member or able bodied passenger is far more
difficult
before separation from an aggressor. Separation improves the chances of subduing an aggressor
promptly before a threat escalates. In all respects of security, our eyes, ears and judgment are
usually
the best tools for self-defence we have.
We do not support the use of harmful devices (weapons) by crew members. Experts emphasize that
proficiency in such skills is difficult to gain in the first place and even more difficult to maintain at an
adequate level over time because of the amount of commitment necessary.
Violence on board can cause more trouble than they are worth.
Crew members are instructed and trained to immobilize unruly passengers that may affect the
safety
of the aircraft by use of non-lethal protective devices. Such training is included in the initial and
requalification
training Security courses and in the recurrent training course, on a frequency in
accordance with requirements (not less than once during every 24-month period).
The National Security Training Program does not require airline operators to train cabin crew
members
on passenger restraining, but according to Blue Air policy and Tokyo Convention, crew members are
instructed to act accordingly.
10.6.14 Psychology of Terrorists to Cope with Hijacker Behaviour and Passenger Responses
A useable psychological profile of a terrorist does not exist. Some common sense indicators do. A
passenger who is nervous or the opposite, numb and distant, should arouse the crew's suspicion.
Similarly, any passenger with an unusual interest in the flight deck and the crew should arouse
suspicion. Such a passenger should be observed most carefully during the first and the last 45
minutes
of the flight, when a hijack attempt is most likely.
Passenger responses to a terrorist action on an aircraft are probably well known to would-be
hijackers.
Intimidation is the first tool of the terrorist in causing submissive and compliant behaviour of crew
and
passengers. By alternately intimidating and reassuring victim, a terrorist can cause the so-called
Stockholm syndrome in which the victim actually sympathizes with the terrorist. Crew members
should
understand the Stockholm syndrome, expect it in a hijack or other terrorist action, and resist it when
they see it in effect.
The crew and passengers will usually outnumber any hijack team by a great margin. There is strength
in numbers, favouring the crew and passengers as long as they are not paralysed by intimidation or
subverted by the Stockholm syndrome.
A group of experts concluded that it is not recommend using the aircraft itself or its systems to
defend
against an attempt to breach the flight deck door and take control of a flight. The experts dismissed
depressurization and aggressive aircraft manoeuvring as effective counter measures.
Depressurization introduces too many unwanted risks and is ineffective against a determined
hijacker.
Aggressive aircraft manoeuvring is theoretically effective and might destabilize a would-be hijacker.
Such manoeuvres would have to be carefully developed by the airline and the manufacturer of the
specific aircraft make and model. But there is no guarantee that those manoeuvres might be
effective.
Furthermore, those manoeuvres might work against the people who could subdue the hijackers
from
within the cabin-cabin crew members, security agents and able bodied passenger helpers.
There is also a very real possibility to inadvertently cause catastrophic failure of the aircraft's
structure.