Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Rubric For Written Assignment

    Uploaded by

    Andrei Justine Tejero
    The document outlines a rubric for grading written assignments. It provides criteria for organization, level of content, development, grammar/mechanics, style, and format. For each criterion, it describes standards for below, meets, exceeds, and far exceeds expectations. For example, for organization it describes below as lacking logical organization, meets as coherent and logically organized with some transitions, exceeds as coherent and logically organized with transitions used throughout, and far exceeds as showing a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric For Written Assignment

    Uploaded by

    Andrei Justine Tejero
    29 views2 pages
    The document outlines a rubric for grading written assignments. It provides criteria for organization, level of content, development, grammar/mechanics, style, and format. For each criterion, it describes standards for below, meets, exceeds, and far exceeds expectations. For example, for organization it describes below as lacking logical organization, meets as coherent and logically organized with some transitions, exceeds as coherent and logically organized with transitions used throughout, and far exceeds as showing a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning.

    Original Title

    Rubric for Written Assignment

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines a rubric for grading written assignments. It provides criteria for organization, level of content, development, grammar/mechanics, style, and format. For each criterion, it describes standards for below, meets, exceeds, and far exceeds expectations. For example, for organization it describes below as lacking logical organization, meets as coherent and logically organized with some transitions, exceeds as coherent and logically organized with transitions used throughout, and far exceeds as showing a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    29 views2 pages

    Rubric For Written Assignment

    Uploaded by

    Andrei Justine Tejero
    The document outlines a rubric for grading written assignments. It provides criteria for organization, level of content, development, grammar/mechanics, style, and format. For each criterion, it describes standards for below, meets, exceeds, and far exceeds expectations. For example, for organization it describes below as lacking logical organization, meets as coherent and logically organized with some transitions, exceeds as coherent and logically organized with transitions used throughout, and far exceeds as showing a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

    CRITERIA BELOW MEETS EXCEEDS FAR EXCEEDS


    STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD
    (2.75 AND (2.5-1.75) (1.5-1.25) (1.0)
    BELOW)
    ORGANIZATION Writing lacks Writing is Writing is Writing shows
    logical coherent and coherent and high degree of
    organization. It logically logically organized attention to logic
    shows some organized. Some with transitions and reasoning of
    coherence but points remain used between points. Unity
    ideas lack unity. misplaced and ideas and clearly leads the
    Serious errors. stray from the paragraphs to reader to the
    topic. Transitions create coherence. conclusion and
    evident but not Overall unity of stirs thought
    used throughout ideas is present. regarding the
    essay. topic.
    LEVEL OF Shows some Content indicates Content indicates Content indicates
    CONTENT thinking and thinking and original thinking synthesis of ideas,
    reasoning but reasoning applied and develops in-depth analysis
    most ideas are with original ideas with and evidences
    underdeveloped thought on a few sufficient and firm original thought
    and unoriginal. ideas. evidence. and support for
    the topic.
    DEVELOPMENT Main points lack Main points are Main points well Main points well
    detailed present with developed with developed with
    development. limited detail and quality supporting high quality and
    Ideas are vague development. details and quantity support.
    with little Some critical quantity. Critical Reveals high
    evidence of thinking is thinking is degree of critical
    critical thinking. present. weaved into thinking.
    points
    GRAMAR AND Spelling, Most spelling, Essay has few Essay is free of
    MECHANICS punctuation, and punctuation, and spelling, distracting
    grammatical grammar correct punctuation, and spelling,
    errors create allowing reader to grammatical punctuation, and
    distraction, progress though errors allowing grammatical
    making reading essay. Some reader to follow errors; absent of
    difficult; errors remain. ideas clearly. Very fragments,
    fragments, few fragments or comma splices,
    comma splices, run-ons. and run-ons.
    run-ons evident.
    Errors are
    frequent.
    STYLE Mostly in Approaches Attains college Shows
    elementary form college level level style; tone is outstanding style
    with little or no usage of some appropriate and going beyond
    variety in variety in rhetorical devices usual college
    sentence sentence used to enhance level; rhetorical
    structure, diction, patterns, diction, content; sentence devices and tone
    rhetorical devices and rhetorical variety used used effectively;
    or emphasis. devices effectively. creative use of
    sentence
    structure and
    coordination
    FORMAT Fails to follow Meets format and Meets format and Meets all formal
    format and assignment assignment and assignment
    assignment requirements; requirements; requirements and
    requirements; generally correct margins, spacing, evidences
    incorrect margins, margins, spacing, and indentations attention to
    spacing and and indentations; are correct; essay detail; all margins,
    indentation; essay is neat but is neat and spacing and
    neatness of essay may have some correctly indentations are
    needs attention. assembly errors. assembled. correct; essay is
    neat and correctly
    assembled with
    professional look.

    You might also like