Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Adolescent Perceptions of Teen Parenting Thesis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Adolescent Perceptions of Teen Parenting

Jairine
Bilang

CHAPTER 3

Results and Discussion

This chapter presents the results, analyses, and interpretations of the gathered

data from the Grade 12 (Senior High School All STRANDS) students as the

respondents of the study.

The personal information of the respondents in terms of age.

Table 1.1. presents the Frequency distribution results of students’ Age who were

subjected to the conduct. The number of respondents present during the Adolescent

Perceptions of Teen Parenting was the (N=90).

Table 1.1. Personal information of the respondents in terms of Age.


Age Frequency Percent
1 (13 to 14 years old) 2 2.2 %
2 (15 to 16 years old) 37 41.1 %
3 (17 to 19 years old) 38 42.2 %
4 (20 years old and above) 13 14.4 %
N= 90 100%

Interpretation:
A frequency table showed we can quickly identify information such as 2 from senior high school
students who got (2.2% of all respondent) are in the 13 to 14 years old range, and that there are
more students with ages in the 17 to 19 years old range (42.2% of all respondent) than any
other height range.

The personal information of the respondents in terms of gross family monthly

income.

Table 1.2. presents the Frequency distribution results of students’ gross Family

monthly income who were subjected to the conduct. The number of respondents

presents during the Adolescent Perceptions of Teen Parenting was the (N=90).

Table 1.2. Personal information of the respondents in terms of gross Family


monthly income.
Age Frequency Percent
1 (below 5,000 pesos) 51 56.7 %
2 (5,001 to 10,000 pesos) 19 21.1 %
3 (10,001 to 15,000 pesos) 12 13.3 %
4 15,001 and above pesos) 8 8.9 %
N= 90 100%

CHAPTER 3
 Table 2.

Results and Discussion


This chapter presents the
results, analyses and
interpretations of the gathered
data from the microbiology
students as the respondents of
the study.
Pre-test mean scores of
Microbiology students
Table 1 presents the mean score
results of the pre-test of
students who were
subjected to Traditional lecture
and Joint Productive Activity as
a teaching strategy. The
number of respondents present
during the pre-test and posttest
were the same (N=18).
Table 1. Pre-test Mean Scores
of Biological Science Students
in
Microbiology in Traditional
Lecture and Joint Productive
Activity
Table 2. The perception of the respondents about teen parenting Mean

Scores of Senior High School Students

Perception of Teen Parenting Mean Score SD Description


Perception of the respondents Agree
about teen parenting
It means that
the perception
3.41 0.629 of teen
If I had a baby as a teen parenting most
of the time

As presented in Table 2, the mean score of students is 3.41 with an SD= 0.629. We

used the mean and standard deviation to find the mean score of Adolescent

Perceptions of Teen Parenting to determine the Description that said Agree with the

range of (3.41-4.20) therefore that the average of the respondents has a view of the

perception of teen parenting most of the time. Such that I would have less time to spend

with friends most of the time, I would lose Friends most of the time, and my life would be
more stressful most of the time. It would conflict with my family’s values most of the time

so on and so forth.

The Perception of Adolescents about teen parenting will be categorically described

following Likert’s scale

Numerical Rating Scale Interpretation

1-1.80 strongly disagree


1.81-2.60 disagree
2.61-3.40 neutral
3.41-4.20 agree
4.21-5 strongly agree

Table 3 Test of Significant Difference in the Adolescent Perceptions of


Teen Parenting when analyzed according to the respondent’s Age.
Perception of Adolescents about Decision with @ 0.05
teen parenting*Age N SS df MS F P-value Result level of confidence
Between Groups 1.36 3 0.45
Within Groups 90 1.15 0.33 Not Significant Accept the Null
33.83 86 0.39 Hypothesis

paired samples t-test showed a


statistically significant increase
in Traditional
Strategy mean scores from Pre-
test (M = 14.5, SD = 2.33) to
Post-test (M = 17.13, SD =
2.47), t(7) = 2.58, p < 0.05
(two-tailed). The mean increase
in Traditional Strategy mean
scores was 2.63 with a 95%
confidence interval.
A paired samples t-test
showed a statistically
significant increase in Joint
Productive Activity Strategy
mean scores from Pre-test (M =
12.25, SD = 2.71) to Post-
test (M = 19, SD = 1.19), t(7) =
6.15, p < 0.05 (two-tailed). The
mean increase in Joint
Productive Activity mean
scores was 6.75 with a 95%
confidence interval.
Hence, the researchers failed to
accept the null hypothesis (H
o
) for there is a
significant difference between
the pre-test and posttest scores.
The application of Joint
Productive Activity as a
teaching strategy enhanced
the test scores of
microbiology
students. It means that Joint
Productive Activity affects
students' test scores positively.
Post test results in Physical
control of microbes between
respondents exposed to
the JPA and Traditional
Strategy
An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there is a statistically

significant between the Perception of adolescents about teen parenting when analyzed

according to Age. 13 to 14 years old (M = 3.27, SD = 0.37),15 to 16 years old (M = 3.34,

SD = 0.63), 17 to 19 years old(M = 3.55, SD = 0.54), 4-20 years old and above(M =

3.24, SD = 0.83)

F (3,86) = 1.15, p(0.33) > 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Hence, the researchers

accept the null hypothesis (H o) for there is no significant difference between the Age

and the Perception of adolescents about teen parenting.

Therefore….

Table 4 Test of Significant Difference in the Adolescent Perceptions of


Teen Parenting when analyzed according to the respondent’s Gross Family
monthly income.
Perception of Adolescents about Decision with @ 0.05 level
teen parenting*Gross Family N SS df MS F P-value Result of confidence
monthly income
Between Groups 3.10 3 1.03
Within Groups 90 2.77 0.047 Significan Reject Accept the Null
t Hypothesis and
32.09 86 0.37 Accept the Ha

An Analysis of Variance(ANOVA) was used to determine if there is a statistically

significant between the Perception of adolescents about teen parenting when analyzed

according to Gross Family monthly income. Below 5,000 pesos (M = 3.31, SD = 0.61),

5,001 to 10,000 pesos (M = 3.76, SD = 0.70), 10,001 to 15,000 pesos (M = 3.28, SD =

0.34), 15,001 and above pesos (M = 3.41, SD = 0.67)

F (3,86) = 1.15, p(0.047) < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Hence, the researchers

fails to accept the null hypothesis (H o) and accept the Alternative hypothesis for there is

a significant difference between the Gross Family monthly income and the Perception of

adolescents about teen parenting.

Therefore….

Table 4.1 Pos Hoc Analysis Test of Significant Difference in the Adolescent
Perceptions of Teen Parenting when analyzed according to the respondent’s
Gross Family monthly income.
Perception of Adolescents Decision with @ 0.05 level
about teen parenting*Gross N Mean df MS T-value P-value Result of confidence
Family monthly income
Below 5,000 pesos 3.31 3 Reject Accept the Null
5,001 to 10,000pesos 90 Significant Hypothesis and
Accept the Ha
2.77 0.047
3.76 86 -0.454

The present study was conducted to determine If the Gross Family monthly
income has an impact on the Perception of the respondents about teen parenting. The
participant was randomly assigned into 4 categories: Below 5,000 pesos, 5,001 to
10,000 pesos, 10,001 to 15,000 pesos, and 15,001 and above pesos. On table 4 One-
way ANOVA was utilized to determine the significant differences that exist between the
Adolescent Perceptions of Teen Parenting and the Gross Family monthly income, F
(3,86) = 2.77, p<0.05. Tukey’s HSD was used as a post hoc test or Analysis to test if
there’s a significant difference between the Gross Monthly Family income and its
Groups. It reveals that those who have a Gross Family Monthly income of below 5000
and 5001 to 10,00pesos have statistically significant differences (M=3.31, MS=-0.454),
df (3,86), T = 2.77with p(0.047)<0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Moreover, these
findings show that most of the respondents who have a Gross monthly family income of
5,001 to 10,000pesos significantly had an impact on the Adolescent Perceptions of
Teen Parenting. That they agree.

Hence, the researchers failed to accept the null hypothesis (H o) and accept the
Alternative hypothesis, and conclude that there is a significant difference between the
Gross family monthly income of between Below 5,000 and 5,001 to 10,000 pesos . With
regard to the Perception of adolescents about teen parenting. Have a minimum impact
compared to the other range of income.

Therefore…

Appendix Section test for Assumptions for Analysis of Variance.

Reliability Analysis
Scale Reliability Statistics means the questioner is questionable or unacceptable

  Cronbach's α

scale 0.635

Note. items 'P' and 'U' correlate negatively with the total scale and probably should be reversed

Appendix
 

You might also like