BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS

A. Bhumerg, Criminal Justice, (1967).

A.A.S. Zuckerman, The Principles of Criminal Evidence, Oxford, (1989).

Abernathy, M. Glenn, Civil Liberties Under the Constitution, (1971).

Ames Edward Sribner, Encyclopaedia ofSocial Sciences, Vol.4 (1950).

Amir Ali and Woodroffe, Law ofEvidence, 14th Edn. Den., Vol.l (1979).

Andrews, J.A., Human Rights in Criminal Procedure 17(1982).

Arora, D.S., Constitutional Rights and Limitations, (1990).

Basu, D.D., Commentary on the Constitution ofIndia, (1978).

Batra, Manjula, Protection of Human Rights in Criminal Justice

Administration - A Study of the Rights of Accused in Indian And
Soviet Legal Systems, (1989).

Bentham, Treatise on Judicial Evidence, (1825).

Buttler & Garcia, Archobold Criminal Pleadings Evidence and Practice in

Criminal Cases, 35tn Edn., (1962).

C. Haward, Criminal Justice in England, London, (1931).

Chaturvedi, A.N., Rights ofAccusd under Indian Constitution, 1984.

Chaturvedi, R.G. and Singh, K.K., The Police Acts - Central and States,
(1979).

Coraies, W.F., Encyclopaedia ofLaws ofEngland, Vol.III (1907).

 404

Cox Sir Edmond, C., Police and Crime in India, (1976).

Cross Ruphert, An Outline of the Law ofEvidence, (1964).

Dwivedi, K.C., Right to Freedom And The Supreme Court, (1994).

Fox, Contempt of Court, (1927).

G.L. Williams, The Proof of Guilt, 3rd Edn., (1963).

Hidayatullah, M., Constitutional Law ofIndia, (1984).

Holdsworth, History ofEnglish Law, 7th Edn., (1956).

Howard, Criminal Justice in England, London, (1931).

Inbau, Lie Detection and Criminal Interrogation, Edn. 2nd, (1948).

Inbau, Self-Incrimination, (1958).

Jain Kagzi, M.C., The Present Constitutional Issues and Views, (1987).

John H., Wigmore, A Treatise on the System of Evidence In Trials at

Common Law, (1904).

Kane, History of Dharmshastra, Vol.4 (1955).

Khosla, G.D., Our Judicial System, (1949).

Langbein John H., The Historical Origins of The Privilege Against Self
Incrimination at Common Law, (1994).

Lawrence M. Friendman, Crime and Punishment in American History,

(1993).

Leonard W. Levy, Origins of the Fifth Amendment, (1968).

M. Berger, Taking the Fifth, (1980).

 405

Mahajan, V.D., Constitutional Law ofIndia, (1991).

Mason, A.T. and Beaney, W.M., American Constitutional Law -

Introductory Essays and Selected Cases, (1978).

Moriary, Police Law, 7th Edn., (1947).

Murphy, W.F. and Tanenhaus, J., Comparative Constitutional Law: Cases

and Commentaries, (1977).

Pande, D.C., Limits on Police Coercion in U.S.A. and India, Lucknow,

(1966).

Pandey, J., and Dubey, R.K., Civil Liberty under the Indian Constitution,
(1992).

Paras Diwan and Peeyushi Diwan, Human Rights and the Law - Universal
and Indian, (1996).

Phipson on Evidence, 9th Edn.

Radzinowicz, A History of the English Criminal Law, (1948).

Radzinowicz, L. and Wolfgang, M.E., Crime and Justice - The Criminals in

the Arms of the Law, (1977).

Ramachandran, V.G., Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Remedies,

Edn. II, (1982).

Rattan Lai and Dhiraj Lai, The Code of Criminal Procedure, (1991).

Saye, A.B., American Constitutional Law : Cases and Text, 2nd ed. (1979).

Schwartz, B., Constitutional Law - A Text Book, 2nd ed. (1972).

Seervai, H.M., Constitutional Law of India: A Critical Commentary,

(1983).
 406

Shapiro, M. and Hobbs, D.S., American Constitutional Law - Cases and

Analysis,, (1978).

Shapiro, M. and Tresolini, R.J., American Constitutional Law, (1983).

Shukla, V.N., Constitutional ofIndia, Vth ed. (1990).

Singh, M.P., Comparative Constitutional Law, (1989),

Stephen, J.F., Sir, A History of Criminal Law ofEngland, London, (1883).

Stevens, I.N. and Yardley, D.C.M., The Protection ofLiberty, (1982).

Tope, T.K., Constitutional Law ofIndia, (1992).

Tyagi, S., The Code of Criminal Procedure, (1994).

William B. Lockhat, J.H. Choper, Constitutional Rights and Liberties

(American Case Book Series) 1989.

Zuckerman A.A.S., The Principles of Criminal Evidence (Oxford, 1989)

307.
 407

ARTICLES

Aiyappa, P.V., “S. 27 of the Evidence Act Mutilated,” K.L.T. 7 (1977).

Anjaneyulu, M., “Supreme Court on Lock-up Death : An Appraisal,” 17.

Cri.L.J. (1995).

Balusubramaniam, R., “Confession and Pretrial Incarnation,” 84 Cr.L.J. IS

(1978).
Berger Mark, “Burdening the Fifth Amendment Towards a persumptive
Barriers Theory”, J.Cri.L. & Criminology, No.l, 27 (1979),

Bushnell, S.I., “Confession rules: itsnationale (a survey),” 12 Western Ont.

L. Rev. 47-49(1973).

Chandra, G., “J Gajendra Gadkar on Criminal Law,” 8 J.I.L.I. 588 (1966).

Corwin, “The Supreme Court’s Construction of the Self-Incrimination

Clause,” (1930) 29 Mick L. Rev., 1

Devassay, K.P., “S. 27 Evidence Act and Ruling in Shivaji’s case,” K.L.T.
14(1969).
Dhar, P., “Pre-Trial Confession And Right against Self-Incrimination, 62
Cri.L.J. (1986).
Dunmore, Comment on Failure of Accused to Testify,” 1917, Yale Law
Journal, 464.
Dwarka Singh, “Injuries During Arrest,” 57 Cri.L.J. (1987).

Gandotra, H.K.L., “How Far The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Ensures The
Rights Guaranteed to the Accused by the Rule of Law?” 2 Cri.L.J.
1965.
Glanville L. Williams, “The Privileges Against Self-Incrimination : An
International Symposium (England),” 517. Cri. L.C. and P.S., 166,
■ (1960-61).
 408

Grisso, “Juvenile’s Capacities to waive Mirand Rights: Empirical

Analysis,” 68 Calif. L. Rev. 1134 (1980).

Grissol Pomicter, “Interrogation of Juvenile: An Empirical Study of

Procedure, Safeguards and Rights Waiver,” II Hum. Behav. 32 L.
(1977).

Gupta, S.C., “Statement made Before Police And The Rights of the
Accused And the Prosecution,” 34 Cri.L.J. 1964 (1).

Gupta, S.C., “What is police custody and Sec. 25, 26 Evidence Act,”
Cri.L.J. 46(1966).

Henry T. Terry, “Constitutional Provisions Against Forcing Self-

Incrimination,” 1906, Yale Law Journal 15, 17.

Heydon, J.D., “Confession and Silence,” Sydney L.R., 7, 375 (1976).

Howard, A.E.D., “Magna Carta Celebrates its 750 Years,” A.B.A.J. 51, 529
(1965).

Hydervali, B. “Law and Lock-up Deaths in India,” 5 Cri.L.J. (1990).

Hydervali, B. “Right Against Self-Incrimination and The Supreme Court of

India,” 49 Cri.L.J. (1993).

Jacobs, R.C., “Miranda - The English Silence,” Trial 11, 69 (1975).

Karim, S.A., “Blood Test in Paternity Dispute,” 97 Cri.L.J. (1995).

Kauper, “Judicial Examination of the Accused - A Remedy for the Third

Degree,” Mich. L. Rev. 24 (1932).

Lowell A. Lawrence, “The Judicial Use of Torture, II H.L.R., (1897-98).

Lupia Lynnette L., “Fifth Amendment - Admissibility of Confession

Obtained Without Miranda Warnings in Non-Custodial Setting”, 75
J. Cri. L. & Crim., No.3, (1984).
 409

Madhracharya, K.P., “Accepting later plea of guilty of the Accused,” II

M.LJ.I. (1967).

Madhyacharya, K.P., “Accepting plea of guilty of the Accused,” II M.L.J.I.

(1967).

Massey, I.P., “Self Incrimination” IIS. C.J. 10(1971).

“Me Nabb-Mallory Rule,” Geo. L.J. 47, 1 (1958).

Morgan, “The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination,” Minn. L.R. 34, 1

(1949)

Murthy C., Vamma, “Section 27 of the Evidence Act and The

Constitution,” Cri. L.J. 52 (1959).

Osmond K. Frankel, “From Suspicion to Accusation,” 1941-42 The Yale

Law Journal, Vol.51 at 748.

Pandey, D.C., “Guilty Plea in U.S. Federal Courts: A Study of Rule 11,
Federal Rule of Cr.P.C.,” L.R. 124 (1967).

Pittman, “The Colonial and Constitutional History of the Privilege Against

Self-Incrimination in America,” 1935, Va. L. Rev. 21, 763.

Pound, “Legal Interrogation of Persons Accused or Suspected of Crime,” J.

Crim. L.C. &P.S. 1014 (1934).

Powell, Lewis F„ “The Right to a Fair Trial,” A.B.A.J. 51, 534 (1965).

Prasad, B.M., “Confessional Statement under Railway Property (unlawful

possession) Act and Art. 20(3),” 33 Cri.L.J. (1981).

“Privilege Against Self-Incrimination - A Symposium,” J. Crim. L. 7, 129

(1960).

Reddy, B., “Need for amending Sec. 161 and 162 Cr.P.C. 1898,” 75
Cri.L.J. 9 (1969).
 410

“Right to Counsel - A Symposium,” J. Crim. L. 64, 290 (1973).

Sanghvi, G.C., “Recording of Pre-Trial Judicial Confessions Should Be

Prohibited,” 19 Cri.L.J. (1984).

Saran, R.K., “Constitutional validity of Identification of Prisoners Act,

1920 and Section 94 of the Criminal Procedure Code,” 17 Cri.L.J.
(1955).

Sathyavan Nair, V.K., “Accused’s Signature on S.27 Disclosure

Statement,” 81 Cri.L.J. (1996),

“Self-Incrimination Physical and Medical Examination of the Accused,”

Indian Law Institute Study No. 5, New Delhi (1963).

Sharma, S.S., “Fingerprints Science And Its Evidential Significance,” 91

Cri.LJ. (1995).

Singh, Bhawani, “Whether Discovery made in consequence of information

received from an accused after the grant of bail/anticipatory bail is
admissible in evidence under S.27 of the Indian Evidence Act,--.
1872,” 43 Cri.L.J. 1980.

Srivasatava, S.S., “Custodial Death,” 140 Cri.L.J. (1994).

Suryanarayana C., “Testimonial Compulsion as Contemplated By Article

20, Clause (3) of the Constitution of India,” 6 Cri.L.J. (1958).

Wiliam J. Stuntz, “The Substantive Origins of Criminal Procedure,” 1995

The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 105 at 393.

Wiliams, “Police Interrogation, Privileges and Limitation in England,” 52

J. Cri. L.i Crim. andP-S., 50-52 (1961).
JOURNALS AND PERIODICALS

• Academy Law Review

• All England Reporter

• All India Reporter

• Bombay Law Reporter

• Buffalo University Law Review

• California Law Review

• Columbia Law Review

• Criminal Law Journal

• Daily Supreme Views and Law Reporter

• Delhi Law Review

• Harward Law Review

• Indian Law Reports

• Iowa Law Review

• Journal of American Bar Association

• Journal of Bar Council of India

• Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science

• Journal of Indian Law Institute

• Law Quarterly Review

• Legal Aid Newsletter

• Massachusetta University Law Review

 412

• Michigan University Law Review

• New York Law Review

• Punjab Law Reporter

• Punjab University Law Review

• Supreme Court Cases

• Supreme Court Journal

• Supreme Court Reporter

• United States Supreme Court Reports

• Yale Law Journal

□ □□