Ans Keys
Ans Keys
Answer Key
Chapter 1 Chapter 5
Review Questions Case 5-1
1. c 6. c 11. b 16. a 1. No. Adding check cells to all tubes negative at the AHG
2. c 7. d 12. d 17. d phase provides a quality-control measure to the test. The
3. b 8. d 13. d 18. c expected result is positive agglutination. A negative result
4. c 9. a 14. c 19. c deems our test invalid.
5. d 10. a 15. c 20. a 2. The blood bank tech is required to repeat the test, starting
from step 1.
3. The most likely cause is failure to adequately wash cells
after the incubation phase.
Chapter 2 4. Failing to add AHG reagent is also common; AHG reagent
that has failed QC or is expired should never be used for
Review Questions patient testing.
1. b 5. d 9. c 13. a Case 5-2
2. b 6. d 10. a 14. a
3. c 7. b 11. b 15. c 1. Yes.
4. d 8. a 12. a 2. The initial antibody screen gel reaction is positive but
may be demonstrating a method-dependent antibody.
Some antibodies, both specific and nonspecific, have the
ability to demonstrate method dependency. The results
Chapter 3 show reactivity in one method but not others. The nega-
tive reactions in the LISS panel confirm the prediction of
Review Questions the method-dependent antibody.
3. The use of PCR technology to genotype the patient might
1. a 7. b 13. d 19. a
be useful in situations of method-dependent antibodies.
2. c 8. c 14. c 20. b
It should also be noted in the patient’s record that future
3. b 9. d 15. a 21. d
testing should be conducting using the LISS method.
4. d 10. c 16. b
5. d 11. a 17. c Review Questions
6. c 12. a 18. d
1. d 5. b 9. b 13. a
2. c 6. b 10. a 14. b
3. a 7. d 11. c 15. c
Chapter 4 4. a 8. a 12. c 16. b
Review Questions
1. a 5. d 9. c 13. c
2. c 6. a 10. b
3. c 7. d 11. b
4. b 8. d 12. d
601
2682_Answer Key_601-612 22/05/12 5:40 PM Page 602
13. d 18. b 23. c 28. b 3. When working up any antibody identification, it is good
14. c 19. c 24. d 29. d practice to get the patient’s history of transfusions, trans-
15. c 20. d 25. c 30. c plantations, and, if female, pregnancies. A list of medica-
16. b 21. b 26. d tions and the patient’s diagnosis may prove helpful.
17. c 22. a 27. b Knowing the patient’s ethnicity may give clues as to the
identity of the antibody, as antigen frequencies vary
among races. One example of a high-prevalence antigen
associated with a specific ethnicity is the U antigen,
Chapter 9 which is present in virtually all whites and all but approx-
imately 1% of blacks. Anti-U is produced mainly in
Case 9-1 multiparous black females or those patients who have
1. There is inconsistent reactivity (1+ to 3+). The pattern of been repeatedly transfused.
reactivity appears to fit anti-Fyb; however, one homozy-
gous cell (cell 2) reacts 3+ while others (cells 8 and 9) Case 9-3
react only 2+. This inconsistency is seen in the cells with 1. A positive reaction was seen with cell 4 only, which is Jsa
heterozygous antigen expression as well. Cell 7 reacts 2+, positive. All other antibody specificities have been elim-
while cells 1, 6, and 11 react only 1+. inated except for anti-Lua (an antibody to another other
2. Anti-C, anti-Cw, anti-K, anti-Kpa, anti-Jsa, anti-Fyb, anti- low-prevalence antigen).
Jka, and anti-Lua have not been excluded. Fyb antigens 2. Testing with additional antigen-positive cells will be
would be destroyed or diminished after treatment with required to confirm the specificity. Panel cells that are
enzymes. C, Cw, Jka, and Lua would have enhanced antigen positive for these rare antigens are normally indicated on
expression. K, Kpa and Jsa would be unaffected by routine the panel profile sheet or listed on the extended typing
enzymes. form. Testing two other cells positive for the Jsa antigen
3. The specificity of the antibodies was unclear after the ini- to satisfy the 3 and 3 rule and phenotyping the patient
tial panel. After repeating the panel using ficin-treated for the Jsa antigen should be done to complete the antibody
cells, it appears that the antibodies present are anti-K and identification workup. If additional cells are not readily
anti-Fyb. The enzyme treatment removed the Fyb anti- available, consult a reference laboratory.
gens, thereby eliminating the anti-Fyb reactivity, which
allows the anti-K to present clearly. Anti-C and anti-Jka Case 9-4
were also not eliminated by the initial panel. However, 1. All cells (except the I-negative cord blood cells) are positive
one would expect these antibodies to demonstrate en- at the immediate spin phase of testing, and the autocontrol
hanced reactivity with the ficin-treated cells. Anti-Jka may is positive. The reactivity does not persist into the AHG
be excluded using cell 8 of the ficin panel. Whereas phase of testing.
anti-C cannot be excluded using a homozygous cell, the 2. The use of cord blood cells, which lack the I antigen, con-
pattern of reactivity and lack of response to enzyme treat- firms the presence of anti-I in this sample.
ment suggest it is not present in this sample. 3. Many laboratories avoid detection of cold autoantibodies
4. Testing a C+, c–, K–, Fyb– cell would be necessary for by omitting the immediate spin phase of the antibody
exclusion. screen (and panel) and by using monospecific anti-IgG
Coombs’ reagent.
Case 9-2 One of the least complex methods used to prevent cold
1. The positive reactions on this panel are all the same autoantibodies from interfering in antibody detection or
strength. Cell 10, the only cell that failed to react with identification tests is the prewarm technique. In this
the patient’s serum, has been identified as being Yta neg- procedure, the serum being tested and the screen or panel
ative. As Yta is a high-prevalence antigen, one may be sus- cells are heated to 37°C in separate test tubes. Once at
picious that this is the antibody present in this specimen. 37°C, a drop of warm RBCs is added to each of the tubes
2. For this case, the ideal solution is to test two additional containing serum, and the test proceeds with incubation,
Yta-negative cells, which would provide 95% confidence of washing, and AHG steps. The wash step uses saline that
correct antibody identification and allow for additional ex- has also been maintained at 37°C so that at no time is the
clusions. If antigen-negative cells are not readily available, test system allowed to drop below that temperature, thus
it may be necessary to consult a reference laboratory that avoiding the optimal temperature range of the autoanti-
maintains a stock of rare cells. Any other antibodies not body. Because this method does not usually have enhance-
excluded following this testing may require patient phe- ment media in the system, it is possible to fail to detect
notyping or absorption studies to confirm their presence some weak significant antibodies. Also, the warm saline
or absence. The services of a reference laboratory may be may result in the dissociation of some significant antibodies
required to antigen type the patient for the Yta antigen. from the cells.
2682_Answer Key_601-612 22/05/12 5:40 PM Page 604
A more complex method, discussed previously, is ad- ZZAP to enhance expression of certain antigens and facili-
sorption. The patient’s autologous cells may be incubated tate autoantibody removal. These treatment and adsorption
with the patient’s serum at 4°C to remove the autoanti- steps are time-consuming. There is an alternative method,
bodies before antibody detection steps are performed. in which PEG is used to enhance antibody removal, cutting
This method provides autoantibody-free serum for anti- the processing time approximately in half while still pro-
body detection and identification procedures and for viding for adequate autoantibody removal.50,51
compatibility testing. If the autoantibody is particularly 4. The pattern of reactivity in the “absorbed serum” column
strong or if the patient has been recently transfused, RESt of Figure 9–14 matches that of anti-K. Positive reactions
may be used to perform the adsorption instead of the in the autoabsorbed serum were found with cells 2, 6, and
patient’s RBCs. RESt-adsorbed serum is not suitable for 10, which were positive for the K antigen. All other
crossmatch, as anti-B may be removed. antibody specificities could be ruled out except for Cw,
Sulfhydryl compounds, such as DTT and 2-mercap- Kpa, Jsa, and Lua. These are low-prevalence antigens and
toethanol (2-ME), are known to break the disulfide bonds generally do not need to be excluded. Additional pheno-
in IgM. Treating the patient’s serum with such a reagent typing strategies should be employed to determine if the
before the antibody detection test will denature the cold patient is negative for the K antigen.
autoantibody. IgG antibodies are not affected by these 5. Transfusion requirements include RBC units negative for
reagents and will remain detectable. A control of saline the K antigen that appear to be less incompatible with the
and serum is tested in parallel with the treated serum to warm autoantibody than the patient’s own cells (least
ensure that the autoantibody was truly denatured, not incompatible) when tested with the antiglobulin cross-
merely diluted. match method using unabsorbed serum.
Review Questions
1. d 3. d 5. a 7. c Chapter 14
2. a 4. c 6. d 8. d
Case 14-1
1. Top five possible diagnoses for this case:
Case 16-3
1. Laboratory workup for the diagnosis of TAS must rule Chapter 18
out hemolysis and perform a gram stain and culture
Review Questions
of the implicated component and patient. The culture
must be obtained from the container and not the seg- 1. a 8. b 15. a 22. c
ments attached to the product. Blood cultures from the 2. b 9. d 16. c 23. a
patient should be drawn from a site other than the site of 3. d 10. c 17. a 24. d
transfusion. 4. a 11. c 18. d 25. b
2. Symptoms implicated with TAS include a fever with 5. c 12. d 19. c
greater than 2°C increase in body temperature, rigors, and 6. b 13. a 20. d
hypotension. 7. c 14. d 21. b
Review Questions
1.
2.
c
c
5.
6.
c
b
9.
10.
d
d
13. b
14. d
Chapter 19
3. b 7. c 11. d 15. d Case 19-1
4. b 8. b 12. a 1. The most probable cause is that the mother received
prophylactic Rh immune globulin at 28 weeks gestation.
The antibody screen was negative at 28 weeks gestation
Chapter 17 prior to the administration of Rh immune globulin. The
antibody titer of anti-D due to Rh immune globulin is
Case 17-1 typically less than 1:4.4
2. Yes, unless the newborn infant is Rh(D)-negative.
1. The blood group for RBC transfusion is O, which is the
only blood group compatible with both the donor and Case 19-2
recipient. If A is chosen, the cells will be hemolyzed
1. The maternal history, the same father, and the father
or have a shortened life span because of the preexisting
homozygous for the D antigen suggest that the infant is
anti-A in the patient. If B is chosen, engraftment will be
Rh(D)-positive.
difficult to determine.
2. The titer should be repeated in 6 weeks (16 weeks’
2. Group AB should be selected for FFP and platelet trans-
gestation).
fusion. If group A is selected, the anti-B in the plasma
3. The infant is only 8 weeks gestational age, so it is too
is incompatible with the recipient’s RBC and tissue
early in the pregnancy to perform any intervention
antigens (B). The anti-A in group B products is incom-
(MCA-PSV, cordocentesis, intrauterine transfusion). The
patible with the donor RBCs and, if selected, may contribute
earliest an intervention can take place is 16 weeks.
to delayed engraftment of RBC precursors.
4. The patient should be scheduled for MCA-PSV at 16 to
3. On day 117, the interpretation is B, as B cells and anti-A
18 weeks gestation to determine if the test is positive.
are present.
4. On day 200, the interpretation is group A, because A cells Case 19-3
are present, and B cells and anti-A are absent. On day 156,
1. The most probable cause is ABO HDFN. Group O mothers
the forward type is group O (remember that the patient
produce IgG anti-A, which can cross the placenta.
is receiving group O RBC transfusions), but the reverse
2. No. Anti-Lea does not cause HDFN because Lewis anti-
type still has anti-A; thus, the interpretation is indetermi-
gens are poorly developed at birth.
nate. The source of the anti-A may be small amount of
plasma in RBC transfusions or anti-A in ABO-incompatible Case 19-4
platelet transfusions.
1. The blood types of the cord blood and heel-stick speci-
Review Questions mens are different—A-negative versus O-negative. The
severely anemic infant could have HDFN, although the
1. a 4. b 7. c 10. a cord blood results do not indicate severe disease (DAT +/–).
2. e 5. c 8. c 11. b On the other hand, a large fetomaternal hemorrhage
3. d 6. d 9. c 12. c could have occurred.
2682_Answer Key_601-612 22/05/12 5:40 PM Page 608
the guidelines are based should be widely disseminated were unwilling to change their practice patterns. Following
and readily available to clinical staff. review by the transfusion committee, the antiquated order
5. Any of the types of review (retrospective, concurrent, sets were removed and a discontinuous prospective review
targeted, or discontinuous prospective) may be utilized was adopted, focusing on plasma orders for coronary
depending on the facility. However, for a medium- or care patients. In addition, educational measures were
small-sized facility, retrospective review is most likely to employed, in the form of several short lectures on current
be the primary method, due to resource limitations. Large plasma guidelines presented to the coronary unit’s physi-
facilities such as academic institutions are more likely to cians and nursing staff.
have the available personnel to conduct concurrent and 4. Over the following three quarters, the transfusion safety
prospective review actions. Targeted or discontinuous officer continued the discontinuous prospective review
prospective review may be appropriate for smaller facilities, of the coronary care patients in addition to the monthly
since the benefits of “real-time” intervention are balanced retrospective reporting. At the end of the third quarter,
by the limited scope. blood utilization appeared to be at the desired state and
the labor-intensive discontinuous prospective review
Case Study 24-2 strategy was retired. It is important to always reassess and
1. The first step is to determine the gap between the current revaluate the blood utilization management process to
and desired state. This gap defines the scope of the prob- determine the effectiveness of corrective strategies and to
lem and should be qualified and quantified as succinctly identify new areas of waste.
as possible. Review of the value stream will help identify
the source of the problem. In this case, review of the nurs- Review Questions
ing units and physician services show that the plasma 1. d 4. c 7. b 10. b
trend appears to be related to a recent expansion in the 2. a 5. d 8. d
hospital’s coronary care unit. This is further supported by 3. b 6. b 9. a
the observation that the increased usage and waste trends
vanish when the data from the coronary unit are excluded
from the utilization report. Review of the timing of the
blood orders showed that the majority of the increased
utilization appeared just prior to the performance of Chapter 25
cardiac procedures and surgeries. Review Questions
2. Further auditing revealed multiple types of waste with
plasma usage among patients awaiting cardiac surgery 1. b 4. d 7. d 10. b
and procedures. In nearly every case, there was an excess 2. c 5. c 8. a
of plasma ordered in advance of the procedure that was 3. d 6. a 9. b
thawed by the blood bank but was either never dispensed
or never transfused. Regarding the dispensed plasma,
most of these patients had an average of 2 units of unused
thawed plasma. In a few cases, the product was improp-
erly returned and had to be discarded. This overproduc-
Chapter 26
tion type of waste increased the number of expired Review Questions
plasma components, resulting in increased inventory
waste. Further waste was identified through a detailed 1. c 4. b 7. d 10. c
medical chart audit, which demonstrated that nearly 2. a 5. a 8. a
half of the plasma transfused was likely inappropriately 3. d 6. b 9. b
administered when compared to the institution’s transfu- 11. Phase SCI SCII Interpretation
sion guidelines. IS 0 0 Negative
3. Solutions and improvements arise from the collaborative 37ºC 0 0
input of multiple sources such as the medical director AHG 0 0
of the blood bank, the blood bank supervisor, members CC + +
of the transfusion committee, and appropriate members
from administration. If a specific unit or specialty is 12. b
identifiable, as in this case, input should also be requested 13. A. Control functions
from clinical staff in that area. In this case, after investi- B. Acceptance Criteria
gation by the medical director, the new coronary unit was C. Test Cases
employing antiquated order sets copied from another D. Data entry methods
institution. These order sets included template standing E. Documentation methods
plasma orders that were not appropriate for a large insti- F. Result review
tution with readily available thawed plasma. Unfortunately, G. Corrective action
in spite of discussion with the involved practitioners, many H. Acceptance
2682_Answer Key_601-612 22/05/12 5:40 PM Page 611
Chapter 27
2. The supplier’s facility and all intermediaries must be
registered with the FDA and hold state licenses, if appli-
cable by state.
Cases 27-1 through 27-6
Editor’s Note: Because of the nature of these cases, an- Case 28-2
swers are not provided. Answers to these questions would 1. See Box 28–2.
be decided by a judge or jury. 2. The hospital tissue bank must register with the FDA as a
tissue distributer.
Review Questions 3. A decision should be made as to whether the tissue should
1. d be cultured and if so, with which method. The storage con-
2. b tainer and appropriate temperature for storage should also
3. d be decided. (Any of the AORN recommendations for harvest
4. c of autologous tissue are correct answers to this question.)
5. a
Review Questions
1. d 4. b 7. d 10. d
Chapter 28 2. b
3. c
5. b
6. c
8. b
9. d
Case 28-1
1. This tissue manufacturer must be qualified by the medical
director of the tissue bank prior to ordering any tissue.
The surgeon may consider postponing surgeries until
the vendor has been qualified or use tissue from a vendor
currently qualified.