Belgian Congo Case Study
Belgian Congo Case Study
Belgian Congo Case Study
Mapping task
1. Compare the two maps of Africa. How does the location of national boundaries differ?
Particularly in northern Africa.
2. Which European countries dominate the colonial map?
3. Estimate (approximately) the percentage of the continent colonised by England, France and
Belgium.
Go to the website Interactive World History Atlas since 3000 BC for help answering this question.
http://geacron.com/home-en/?&sid=GeaCron377871Search Africa 1885 to 1919.
World War II
Congolese army wins several battles against the Italians in North Africa.
Congo supplies uranium used to build atomic bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Congo offered to Hitler as a bargaining chip for him to lift his occupation of Europe.
Source: http://www.friendsofthecongo.org/history-timeline.html
List A List B
Independence of Congo Amount stolen by Mobutu
Overview
Leopold II was obsessed with achieving international greatness for Belgium and in 1876 he convened
an international conference on the exploration of central Africa. This led, the following year, to his
sending out the intrepid Henry Morton Stanley to sign treaties with local chieftains and lay the
foundations for colonial expansion. Stanley did his work well and in 1885 the Berlin Conference
recognized Leopold II as King-Sovereign of the Congo Free State which was to be in personal union
with the Crown of Belgium. This effectively made Leopold II private owner of a vast Central African
Empire some 80x larger than his entire country. In 1890 King Leopold II organized a military
campaign from the Congo Free State to eradicate the Arab slave trade in central Africa which was
still booming at the time.
This expedition was a success but Leopold also set up a framework for the economic development of
the Congo which eventually led to immense profits from the rubber trees there (which greatly took off
after the invention of the bicycle and automobile) but also immense cruelties inflicted on the
Congolese population. It is for this horror that Leopold II is most remembered these days but a few
key facts should be kept in mind. First of all, a lot of the numbers that are tossed about as to the
number of people who died are quite often simply absurd, at times ranging from 50% to the entire
estimated population of the Congo. Obviously, if these extreme statistics are believed absolutely no
one would have been making any profit at all. Perhaps most importantly though is that Leopold II was
not inflicting these atrocities intentionally. That is often the image that is portrayed with the King being
compared to Hitler. Undoubtedly the King was a hard man and often an unsavoury character but it is
an absolute lie that the horrors of the Congo were purposely carried out by him. Where he can be
blamed is in setting up the system whereby his local officials were paid based on the amount of
rubber they produced which would have seemed to make economic sense but which provided an
incentive for unscrupulous officials to brutalize the natives in order to enrich themselves. Also,
contrary to what many believe, Leopold was troubled by the reports that began to circulate about the
savagery going on in the Congo but, and he can be blamed for this, he was all too willing to believe
advisors who assured him these were malicious lies. The Source below indicates that the horrors
were not just carried out by ‘unscrupulous’ officials, but were, in fact, the policy of the Belgian
authorities.
Source Questions
Read Source 1.0, and then answer the following questions:
1. Who are the ‘some’ referred to in the first paragraph?
2. List three occupations undertaken by the Congolese.
3. Why did famine occur in areas which produced a great deal of food?
4. What were the two purposes of severing hands?
Eventually, however, the reports and international criticism became too great to ignore and in 1904
(though he is seldom given credit for this) it was King Leopold who sent a commission to the Congo
to investigate these reports. Many have dismissed these inquisitors as hand-picked “yes men”
Leopold knew would never report anything negative. Again, this is untrue as the commission met with
native people and leaders as well as colonial officials and returned with a very balanced report. They
cited the advances made by the King’s investments; the roads, schools, hospitals and local
infrastructure that had been created, the humanitarian work done by the often heroic missionaries but
it also reported that a great many abuses were going on as well, many people had died, many
mutilated and many more exploited. Once this was done King Leopold issued new regulations to
correct this situation and in 1908 the Congo Free State became a colony, the Belgian Congo, under
the control of the government rather than being the personal property of the King.
http://madmonarchist.blogspot.com.au/2010/05/monarch-profile-king-leopold-ii-of.html
Source - Congolese men ‘holding hands’. The two white men are British missionaries:
http://en.protothema.gr/meet-king-leopold-ii-of-belgium-the-hitler-of-congo-photos/
Source questions.
1. Why are these men ‘holding hands?’
2. What would be the purpose of this picture being published?
3. What does this picture tell us about the methods of the ruling Belgians?
Source - People who have been mutilated for failing to meet a set quota for the production of a
particular product e.g.: rubber or ivory. http://en.protothema.gr/meet-king-leopold-ii-of-belgium-the-
hitler-of-congo-photos/
Source questions
1. What does this picture tell us about how the Belgians treated the Congolese?
2. Would these mutilations have served any useful purpose? What?
Source - 'In the Rubber Coils', a Punch cartoon of 1906, shows King Leopold's stranglehold on the
Congo. http://www.historytoday.com/tim-stanley/belgiums-heart-darkness
1. What does this cartoon say about the ‘grip’ King Leopold had on Congo?
2. Why specifically ‘rubber’ coils and not coils made from something else?
3. What can you say about the impact the Belgians had on the Congolese from the context of this
source?
4. Analyse each source and examine the audience, purpose and effectiveness of each. You are
to write a paragraph on each analysing the usefulness of the source as well as the audience,
purpose and effectiveness.
Source: http://www.populstat.info/Africa/congokig.htm
We can see from these figures that Congo is a little smaller in total area than Western Australia
(2,600,000 sq.km). This vast region was capable of producing all sorts of valuable agricultural and
mineral resources which made very attractive indeed to a potential colonising power.
Source A
They were no colonists; their administration was merely a squeeze, and nothing more, I suspect.
They were conquerors, and for that you want only brute force... They grabbed what they could get for
the sake of what was to be got. It was just robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great scale.
Conrad 1902: 21
Source B
The Free State system was little more than one of plunder, and no regard was paid either to the
wellbeing of the local population or to the conservation of the herds of elephants or the wild rubber
plants. Ewans 2002: 164
Source C
At every important point there is a well-appointed hospital. There are churches, schools and
laboratories and well-constructed Government buildings. Vast tracts of equatorial forest have been
cleared, and the land has been planted in rubber, cocoa, coffee and other trees and vines, as well as
with garden vegetables. Report of a traveller to Congo, quoted in Hunicke 1909: 605
Source D
Whereas with most colonies, imports tended to exceed exports in the early years, due to the need to
invest in infrastructure, administration and other areas which did not generate quick returns, in the
Congo exports exceeded imports by a wide margin almost from the outset and well into the 1920s.
Ewans 2002: 164
Source E
The system of ‘direct rule’ had broken down. Practically all decisions were referred to Leopoldville,
with the result that little was decided at all. At the village level there was either a chief who had lost
the respect of his people, or a soldier with a gun, usually from some other part of Africa, whose only
concern was to enforce payment of taxation in produce or labour. Ascherson 1999: 253
Source A
Under the system, districts were ‘taxed’ for quotas of food, porterage, ivory, rubber and other
commodities. The administrators were constantly urged to expand production to the maximum, and it
was made clear to them that promotion would be dependent on the amounts of produce they
succeeded in obtaining. Ewans 2002: 161
Source B
Incidents of flogging, summary execution, burning of villages, amputation of hands for failure to
collect an adequate supply of rubber. Simmons 1963: 12
Source C
In late 1907, [the British] Vice-Consul Armstrong found that Africans were being obliged to work an
average of twenty days a month solely to pay the rubber tax. Ascherson 1999: 252
Source D
The imposition of a heavy head tax forced able-bodied men to migrate to work areas: plantations,
mines, railway, roads, ports, and white residential areas. Gondola 2002: 84
Source E
The Force Publique arrived in a village and began looting it in retaliation for the villagers’ refusal to
carry out orders. The soldiers then attacked the villagers and seized their women, whom they
declared as hostages until the chief could bring in the required quantity of rubber... To add insult to
injury, the soldiers sold the women back to their families for the price of a couple of goats apiece.
Gondola 2002: 68
Source F
If they failed to bring the required amount... native troops, many of them cannibals, were sent into the
village to spread terror, if necessary by killing some of the men; but in order to prevent a waste of
cartridges, they were ordered to bring one right hand for every cartridge used. If they missed, or used
cartridges on big game, they cut off the hands of living people to make up the number. Russell 1934:
453
1. Make a list of the negative impacts on the Congolese people described in the above sources.
Source A
In the lake district things are pretty bad... Whole villages and districts I knew well and visited as
flourishing communities in 1887 are today without a human being; others are reduced to a handful of
sick or harassed creatures who say of the government: ‘Are the white men never going home; is this
to last forever?’ Casement 1903
Source B
Not only did rubber collection provide no profit [for the Africans], but it also caused a crisis of
subsistence because villagers could not tend to their plots when they were most needed. Gondola
2002: 67
Source C
Brutality was widespread in mines and on plantations. The population of the entire state is said to
have declined from some 20 million to 8 million. Encyclopaedia Britannica 2010
Source D
On the 25th of July (1903) we reached Lukolela where I spent two days. This district had, when I
visited it in 1887, numbered fully 5,000 people; today the population is given, after a careful survey, at
less than 600. The reasons given me for their decline in numbers were similar to those furnished
elsewhere, namely, sleeping-sickness, general ill-health, insufficiency of food, and the methods
employed to obtain labour from them by local officials and the exactions levied on them. Casement
1904
Source E
Soldiers customarily wiped out whole villages and brought the right hands of their victims to the white
commissioner. This happened so much that human hands took on a value of their own, becoming a
sort of currency. Gondola 2002: 68
1. What would be the effects on the lives of those people whose hands were cut off?
2. What else did these people suffer?
Source A
It would be absurd for us to mistreat the blacks because no state prospers unless the population is
happy and increasing. I do not deny that there have been cases of misjudgement on the part of
Congo officials. Most likely cruelties, even crimes have been committed. There have been a number
of convictions before Congo tribunals for these offences. Interview with Leopold II, quoted in
Publishers’ Press 1906
Source B
Leopold had won a libel action in 1902 against the publishers of atrocity revelations and extracted
from a Baptist delegation to Brussels an address of gratitude for Leopold’s generosity towards their
missions on the Congo. Ascherson 1999: 247
Source C
The damning effect [of The Report of the Congo Commission of Enquiry, 1905] would be hard to
exaggerate. It spoke of an underlying ‘system’ of merciless commercial exploitation of the natives. In
a word, it proved that Leopold had established not a state, in any true sense, but a gigantic trading
company, with all other considerations subordinated to profits. Daniels 1908: 893
Source D
Leopold was, by any standards, a monster – a man of immense ability, but one who was wholly
devoid of principle and prepared to lie, cheat and deceive on a grand scale in order to achieve his
ends. Ewans 2002: 2
Source E
In March 1908, the deal was officially settled. The Belgian Government received full sovereignty over
Congo in return for taking on 110 million francs worth of debts that Leopold had incurred. The Belgian
government also agreed to pay more than 45 million francs to complete some of the king’s projects in
Belgium. They were to pay Leopold another 50 million francs, to be extracted from Congo, as a ‘mark
of gratitude for his sacrifices made for Congo.’ Gondola 2002: 75
1. Read the evidence and see whether you want to defend or prosecute Leopold for crimes in the
Congo Free State. Then make a list of all the points you would use to win your case. Use other
pages as well.
Source A
Rubber
1890 556
1895 2882
1900 39,874
1905 43,755
Ivory
1889 2227
1890 4669
1891 2835
1892 3730
Source B
I am the ruler of the Congo, but the prosperity of the country no more affects me financially than the
prosperity of America increases the means of President Roosevelt. I have not one cent invested in
Congo industries and I have not received any salary as Congo Executive in the past twenty-two
years. Interview with Leopold II, quoted in Publishers’ Press 1906
Source C
The Congo profits were used to fund a grandiose policy of public works and urban improvement – in
Belgium. The face of Brussels was to be transformed, and large tracts of urban land were acquired
for the purpose. On completion, the buildings immediately became the property of the Belgian state.
In all, the Belgian nation received property worth more than $4.800,000 from the Congo. Reader
1998: 537–538
Source D
Although Leopold claimed never to have profited personally from the Congo, a secret trust set up in
Germany was subsequently discovered – with £1.8 million of Congo profits on deposit. Reader 1998:
542
Source E
The history of the transformation of Congo Free State from a liability to a highly profitable enterprise
can be summed up in two words: red rubber. Gondola 2002: 66
Extension Activity:
Write an extended response analysing King Leopold’s reign. Look at both the negative and positive
aspects of it, including references to the sources above.
L. Perry Curtis, Nancy Jacobs, Peter Uvin, Henry Leir, Paul Cunningham.
New Congo uprising and massacres hidden by media and united nations
http://www.consciousbeingalliance.com/2010/01/belgian-paratroopers-to-crush-rising-congo-rebellion
Photographs
Source Work
https://www.britishmuseum.org/pdf/CongoFreeState_Students_WkSheets_UPDATED.pdf