Lecture 3 Topic 3 Notes Econ1020
Lecture 3 Topic 3 Notes Econ1020
Lecture 3 Topic 3 Notes Econ1020
For example: Botswana’s real GDP increased by a massive 8,400% during 1961-2017
In analysing changes in GDP or GDP per capita over time, it’s useful to distinguish b/w short-run & long-run
movements this can be done by decomposing GDP movement into a trend
when economists talk about long-run growth, they refer to the trend
when economists talk about business cycles, they refer to movements of GDP around the trend
TREND OF GDP:
Not necessarily a smooth curve (like example)
Economists have a very specific way to define the long-run trend of GDP
POTENTIAL GDP:
a country’s long-run trend GDP value is called potential GDP
potential GDP is NOT its max. GDP
you can imagine it as the output that a country can produce when firms operate on their normal hours using a
normal workforce
can be defined as level of output that keeps inflation stable
PRODUCING MORE THAN POTENTIAL GDP:
If firms overuse the labour & capital (i.e. work their machines & workers overtime) the economy will
produce more than its potential GDP
this isn’t sustainable in the long run
OUTPUT GAP:
difference b/w actual GDP & potential GDP is called output gap
expressed as percentage of potential GDP
lower demand for workers may cause laying off workers leading to higher unemployment
weaker demand for workers will put downward pressure on prices lower inflation
Example:
if there’s a large +ve output gap implying higher inflation to come then the central bank may ↑interest rates to
prevent an inflation outbreak
for policymakers: the labour market condition is often a key factor in the deliberation of policies
the unemployment rate can also provide insights into how the economy is performing more generally, making
it an important factor in thinking about monetary policy
ABS SURVEY:
every month the ABS conduct a survey to collect data on those aged 15 & above regarding their participation
in the labour market
DRAWBACK OF THIS DEFINITION: incudes retirees, or people simply too old to work
ALTERNATIVE DEFINITION: aged 15 to 64
ABS CATEGORIES:
In the labour force: includes people who
are willing to work, regardless of whether
or not they have a job
Not in the labour force: includes people who are NOT in a job & not looking for work
includes fulltime students, stay-home parents or caretakers, retirees & people who are permanently unable to
work for health reasons
2. Unemployed: includes people who are not in a job but are actively looking to work & available to work
Once the number of people in each of these categories has been estimated we can construct some indicators to
monitor the labour market development
IMPORTANT FORMULAS:
3.3 MEASURING
UNEMPLOYMENT PART 2:
RBA EXAMPLE:
the unemployment rate is also affected by changes in the size of the labour force (the denominator).
Underemployment rate and unemployment rate measured against labour force NOT working age population
if hypothetically, 0.2 million workers faced the same situation & took the same decision as Paul it would affect the
labour market indicators
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE:
once someone leaves labour
force they’re no longer
counted as unemployed ∴ # of unemployed people will ↓ by 0.2M
unemployed ↓
×100
labour force ↓
unemployment rate: ↓ from 5.3% 3.8%
if someone says unemployment rate is getting better, check other indicators such as labour force participation
rate & underemployment rate to get a full picture
questions:
if more women decide to enter the labour market, the immediate effect will be….
The unemployment rate will decrease in some unemployed persons are forced into early retirement. The
labour force participation rate will increase if some full-time students drop out of school to find jobs
CYCLICAL UNEMPLOYMENT:
caused by business cycle fluctuations when GDP moves above or
below its potential
DURATION:
often described as being medium-term in nature (one to 12 months)
UNEMPLOYMENT AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE BUSINESS
CYCLE:
ECONOMIC DOWNTURN: where GDP is below its potential lvl. & demand for GAS is weaker than
usual
as a result, businesses might lay off existing workers or hire fewer new workers
this makes it harder for people looking for a job to get a job
there are 2 other components of unemployment & they are always +ve
although cyclical unemployment is driven by business cycles, it tends to lag behind changes in the business
cycle by months or even more
FRICTIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT:
arises from the natural rhythm of the labour market
it’s natural for some people to move b/w jobs as well as moving in & out of the labour force
but it can take time for workers to find the right job & for firms to find the right employees
may not influence wages or inflation
DURATION:
generally shorter term (less than 1 month)
likely to occur at all points of the business cycle
EXAMPLES:
1. Michelle dislikes a 9:00 -5:00 office job so she quits & goes to search for a more creative job
2. when you graduate & start to look for a job, you become part of the labour force so you become frictionally
unemployed until u get a job
time of matching the right person w/ the right job ∴ help lower frictional
unemployment
however, even w/ good matching technology, it still takes time for a job seeker to write resume, submit
application, interviews, checks etc
DURATION:
Tends to be longer lasting than other types of unemployment it can take a number of yrs to develop new
skills or move to a different region to find a job that matched their skills
people who are unemployed due to structural factors are more likely to face long-term unemployment
POLICIES:
in theory, this type of unemployment shouldn’t directly influence wages or inflation & is best addressed
through policies that focus on skills & supply of labour
For example:
jobs in urban areas will not help reduce unemployment in rural areas if people are reluctant to move
Workers can become unemployed if they work in industries that are declining in size
TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS:
Automation contributes to
structural unemployment
While technological improvement often creates structural unemployment, it
also created new job opportunities
Example, although car manufacturers laid off manufacturing workers, there was more demand for software engineers
to program the robots to build cars
3.5 TYPES OF
UNEMPLOYMENT PART 2:
COMBINING THE 3 TYPES OF
UNEMPLOYMENT:
unemployment = cyclical + frictional + structural
GDP = potential GDP cyclical unemployment = 0 economy attains “full employment” & its natural rate of
unemployment
since frictional & structural unemployment is always +ve the natural rate of unemployment is always +ve
For example:
LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT:
the duration an individual experiences unemployment may be long or short
In normal economic times you would have been able to find another jobs within months (had this been the
case, you would have been frictionally unemployed).
However, because of the poor economic environment, companies are not hiring and you remain unemployed
for two years.
Unfortunately, your skills become outdated and you have lost most your industry connections over this period
of time. you have gradually changed from cyclically unemployed to structurally unemployed!
QUESTIONS:
Consider the causes of these three types of unemployment. Can you tell which kind of unemployment is not
only necessary but could also be good for the economy?
Frictional unemployment will never be fully eliminated - people will always be leaving old jobs and starting new ones.
Job changing could potentially improve job-skill matching and thus productivity. As such, frictional unemployment is
arguably necessary and desirable.
LUDDITE:
people who are opposed to technological changes for job security concerns are known as the Luddite
LUDDITE FALLACY:
the concern of the luddite turns out to be a fallacy
textile machines didn’t cause widespread unemployment for the economy although textile machines initially
reduced # of workers in textile factories, it led to lower output prices & thus higher demand textile products,
creating new jobs at the same time
w/ cheaper textile products, consumers were left w/ more money to spend on existing or new products
increasing other new employment opportunities
ANOTHER EXAMPLE:
in 1900, 41% percent of the US workforce was in agriculture.
by 2000, the share had fallen to 2% due to better labour-saving technology.
but it did not result in massive unemployment, because people moved from agriculture to other new
industries, such as entertainment, finance, and manufacturing.
Will this be a modern version of luddite fallacy? technology will make some old jobs obsolete by create new jobs at
the same time
Even if new jobs are created as a result of new technology, can we learn fast enough to benefit from it?
What if new technology emerges faster than we can adapt?