Roland Berger Belgian Banks Disruption
Roland Berger Belgian Banks Disruption
Roland Berger Belgian Banks Disruption
Management summary
In a poll of Belgian bank executives looking into the Taking action will be key for financial institutions to
main forces bringing uncertainty and (potentially) dis- avoid losing ground to competing Belgian and interna-
rupting their business, the most frequently cited were: tional banks, as well as to Big Techs. Having a clear strat-
digital banking, big data, robot process automation, ar- egy on how to (further) leverage these innovations
tificial intelligence, peer-to-peer networks, blockchain should therefore be top priority for Belgian banks. If
and open banking. they want to achieve quick wins as well as a sustainable
improvement in profitability, Belgian banks will need to
Indeed, for each of these digital forces early signs of position themselves on these innovations in line with
their impact are already visible – either in the develop- their individual corporate DNA and strategy.
ment of FinTechs active in the Belgian market or in in-
ternational examples of banks that have already em-
braced (and successfully managed) these disruptions.
Contents
Chapter 1:
Belgian banks have returned to pre-crisis profitability For the last 15 years, digital banking has tended to in-
levels, driven by both a decrease in costs and an increase crease rather than decrease net costs given its role as an
in revenues (mainly fees and commissions). Today, we additional channel used in a mostly hybrid customer
see several innovations emerging, potentially disrupting journey. However, we believe that over the next 10 years,
the products, processes and business models of the na- banks will be able to capitalize on the investments made
tion's banks. Yet it remains unclear where the real gains in the past and reduce costs in the physical branches.
could be or where the biggest threat lies. The impact is illustrated in the plans proposed by
When Roland Berger experts advise Belgian bank execu- several leading Belgian banking groups, which have
tives, the latter mostly refer to seven causes of disrup- announced FTE reductions of up to 25% associated
tion: digital banking, big data, robot process automa- with digitalization.
tion, artificial intelligence, peer-to-peer networks, However, it should be noted that Belgian customers
blockchain, open banking. tend to be conservative with regard to digitalization, es-
For each of the seven areas of innovation, we see both pecially compared to their Northern European counter-
early signs of their development through the advent of parts. While services like payments can be expected to
FinTechs active in the Belgian market on the one hand, become fully digital, a large proportion of the custom-
and international examples of banks that have em- ers will still want a more personal form of contact at key
braced these changes ahead of the curve on the other. moments like when they are starting a business or get-
For all of the innovations, we analyzed the potential im- ting a mortgage. Banks should therefore find the right
pact they could have on the ultimate bottom line of Bel- balance between digital banking and personal contact
gian banks and identified FinTechs working on the is- at their branches to ensure sufficient customer intimacy,
sues concerned. A and many Belgian banks are currently rolling out "in-be-
We base our assessment on the actual state and expect- tween" options whereby personal advice is provided re-
ed evolution of the underlying technology or business motely. Furthermore, any reduction of branches and
model. The disruptive forces are bringing uncertainty to staff numbers should be in line with the overall strategy
the industry and requiring banks to develop specific ap- of the bank. Banks who position themselves as custom-
proaches for how to navigate complexity. This study of- er-relationship oriented, for example, are expected to
fers useful guidance on which battles Belgian banks have lower levels of digitalization and cost reduction
should fight. than banks focusing on digital only.
Two additional risks we identified are included in our
THE SEVEN FORCES OF DISRUPTION analysis of the impact of digital banking: a reduction in
up-selling and cross-selling activities (given digital
1. DIGITAL BANKING banking's lower effectiveness than the physical channel
The shift from a physical client relationship managed in in this regard) and a margin reduction (given the fact
brick and mortar branches to a more digital client rela- that digital banking makes products simpler and in-
tionship has been going on for several years. With the creases transparency). However, our analysis shows that
introduction of first internet banking and now the wide- digital banking is the innovation with the greatest po-
spread use of mobile banking, banks have already taken tential to increase profitability for banks both in the
major steps into the digitalization of banking services. short term (3-5 years) and in the long term (10 years).
6 Roland Berger Focus – Turning risks into opportunities
A: Selected Belgian FinTechs and international reference players for each of the disruptive innovations.
2. BIG DATA
Banks' awareness of the value of the customer data they situations. In so doing, they do not fully optimize the
possess (such as transaction behavior, services used and value of their offering to the customer and the "custom-
personal data) rocketed with the advent of big data. Big er lifetime value" to the bank. Making effective use of
data is currently increasingly used to extract relevant in- big data will allow banks to increase up-selling and
formation and to understand and predict customer be- cross-selling by personalizing product offerings, ulti-
havior. While the technology behind big data and data mately increasing both interest and fee and commission
analytics is already fairly mature, there is still signifi- income. Moreover, big data will enable banks to make
cant potential for banks to further capture and leverage their marketing efforts more effective and therefore has
customer data in the coming years. the potential to reduce their marketing spend. Finally,
Belgian banks operating in the market today do not yet analyzing online behavior and historic data improves
fully tailor their product offering to their customers' banks' ability to estimate customer risk profiles, giving
needs or sufficiently respond to changes in customer them the opportunity to engage in risk pricing.
Turning risks into opportunities – Roland Berger Focus 7
The main costs and processes that will be impacted by A second area where major savings can be expected
blockchain are fees paid to intermediaries for clearing through the use of blockchain is compliance, and more
and settlement, as well as payments, trade finance, syn- specifically in know your customer (KYC) and anti-mon-
dicated loans, internal and external audit and compli- ey laundering (AML) arrangements. The KYC process is
ance (mainly in KYC processes). both costly and time consuming for banks. Moreover, it
Taking the example of settlement, fees are expected to has to be done at all banks for each new customer. Put-
go down by 15-30% over the next 10 years. This reflects ting these processes on blockchain would speed up the
the potential blockchain has for clearing houses like process and avoid duplication of work. From a techno-
SWIFT or Euroclear to significantly improve their inter- logical point of view, costs linked to KYC and AML could
nal processes, generating savings which will ultimately be cut in half in the next 3-5 years. The main hurdle is
be passed on to the banks. From a technological point the need for collaboration between banks. If data on a
of view, it is often argued that the distributed ledger customer is submitted by one bank, another bank has to
technology would allow banks to completely cut out trust this data in order to achieve the cost reduction in
clearing and settlement intermediaries. However, look- full. As each bank will remain liable for its own custom-
ing at SWIFT, we believe this scenario is highly unlikely ers, it is currently unclear to what extent the banks
to materialize within the time span of our analysis for
two reasons:
> SWIFT connects ~11,000 banks in 200 countries. Cut-
ting out SWIFT would require all banks to agree to Blockchain
develop a blockchain together and all banks to devel-
op interfaces with the common blockchain. We be- SettleMint
lieve this would present an almost insurmountable
challenge. SettleMint is a Belgian-based start-up that was incorporat-
> Blockchain technology is not yet mature enough to ed in August 2016. The founders met while devising and
process the large volume of payments currently pro- developing blockchain applications for a large Belgian
cessed by SWIFT in a short timeframe. financial institution, but with SettleMint their aim is to
make blockchain accessible not only to financial institu-
A scenario where banks would be bypassed altogether tions, but also to governments and companies in other
in payments through the use of cryptocurrencies is also industries.
highly unlikely from a society point of view. Once there They developed and distribute the 'Mint' middleware, a
is no longer an intermediate party, customers would suite of software development kits and developer tools that
bear the risk for their own payments. For example, if enable software developers to build blockchain-based
customers entered an incorrect account number or applications. SettleMint has already developed the first
fraud was committed with a cryptocurrency account, fully functioning applications, whereby they developed,
there would be no intermediate party who could re- tested and implemented proof-of-concept applications in
verse the transaction. We believe the resulting lack of banking, government, telecoms and the supply chain.
trust places a limit on the growth potential of crypto-
currencies.
Turning risks into opportunities – Roland Berger Focus 11
Chapter 2:
B: Profitability impact and required investment of the innovations (short term and long term).
2.0%
AI
1.5%
Digital banking Big data
1.0%
AI
0.5%
Blockchain
Big data RPA
RPA
0.0%
Blockchain
P2P P2P
-0.5%
-1.0%
Open banking
-1.5%
Open banking
-2.0%
Future required investments Future required investments
ROE impact Quick wins Capitalizing on past investments Long-term strategic priorities Minor threat Major threat
Take the pulse – To unlock the full potential, banks aligned with the overall strategy and DNA of the bank.
should first feel the pulse of the ecosystem and Experiment and collaborate – Once the bank has
FinTech landscape. Banks very often have an internal determined its battlefield, it should start experiment-
focus, being large, complex organizations continuously ing with the technologies and collaborate with other
offering the same type of products to their clients. players to adopt the innovations. The bank can set up
Therefore, it is important to look outside the boundar- a team that has both an internal and an external view
ies of the organization and to be early and open to on all aspects of the considered innovations and that
collaborate with other players. An assessment of the can think and work outside the traditional bank
ecosystem, with a mapping of the different players, environment (sometimes also literally). This team
their key activities and the identification of who could should be able to work in an agile way to quickly build
be potential partners, is a first key step on the road to the necessary experience with the technologies,
adopting an innovation mindset to generate growth. collaborate with FinTechs or other partners from the
Choose your battles – Based on a good understanding ecosystem. To obtain fast results, prototypes can be
of the ecosystem and potential partners, the bank has to built that can be first tested by a group of beta-users
determine what the potential impact of the innovation is to incrementally improve the prototype and gradually
on the organization and choose the key focus areas evolve into a minimum viable product.
18 Roland Berger Focus – Turning risks into opportunities
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTORS
MARGOT DESSEYN
Consultant
+32 47 6446367
margot.desseyn@rolandberger.com
This publication has been prepared for general guidance only. The reader should not act according to any
information provided in this publication without receiving specific professional advice. Roland Berger GmbH
shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any use of the information contained in the publication.
About us
Roland Berger, founded in 1967, is the only leading global consultancy of German
heritage and European origin. With 2,400 employees working from 34 countries,
we have successful operations in all major international markets. Our 50 offices
are located in the key global business hubs. The consultancy is an independent
partnership owned exclusively by 220 Partners.
Navigating Complexity
Roland Berger has been helping its clients to manage change for half a century.
Looking forward to the next 50 years, we are committed to supporting our clients
as they face the next frontier. To us, this means navigating the complexities that
define our times. We help our clients devise and implement responsive strategies
essential to lasting success.
Publisher
ROLAND BERGER GMBH
Sederanger 1
80538 Munich
Germany
+49 89 9230-0