Review Not peer-reviewed version

The Yin and the Yang of

Hemostasis in End-Stage-Liver-

Disease

*
Fuat H. Saner , Ecaterina Scarlatescu , Dieter Broering , Dmitri Bezinover

Posted Date: 17 July 2023

doi: 10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

Keywords: cirrhosis; hemostasis; sepsis; visco-elastic tests

Preprints.org is a free multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that

is dedicated to making early versions of research outputs permanently

available and citable. Preprints posted at Preprints.org appear in Web of

Science, Crossref, Google Scholar, Scilit, Europe PMC.

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons

Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any

medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting
from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.

Review
The Yin and the Yang of Hemostasis in End-Stage-
Liver-Disease
Fuat H. Saner 1,*, Ecaterina Scarlatescu 2, Dieter-Clemens Broering 1, Dmitri Bezinover 3
1 King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center; Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, Riyadh/KSA
2 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine III, Fundeni Clinical Institute, , Bucharest,
Romania and University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Department, Bucharest, Romania
3 Penn Anesthesiology and Critical Care HUP, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania,

Philadelphia, PA 19104, US
* Correspondence: Email: fuat.saner@me.com; Tel: 0966 55 086 3575

Abstract: Patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) undergoing liver transplantation are prone
to thromboses both while on the waiting list or in the perioperative period. This hypercoagulability
is associated with significant endothelial dysfunction (ED) due to nitric oxide dysregulation. ED in
combination with increased thrombin generation are the main factors responsible for this
hypercoagulability. Sepsis itself can significantly change the coagulation profile, but in
combination with ESLD, sepsis, and septic shock is responsible for very complex changes in the
patients coagulation making both assessment and management of coagulation in patients with
ESLD very challenging. Viscoelastic testing (VET) is a preferred method of coagulation management
in patients with cirrhosis because, as with standard laboratory testing, VET can assess the entire
coagulation system including the interaction between both pro- and anticoagulants and platelets.

Keywords: Liver Cirrhosis; Fibrinolysis; Liver and Sepsis; Hemostasis Monitoring

Introduction
End stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with significant changes in a patient’s coagulation
profile. These changes are unique in that they involve all branches of the coagulation system. Despite
of significantly reduced concentration of coagulation factors and platelets, patients with ESLD may
have provoked or unprovoked bleeding or clotting events. When sepsis is added to the mix, the entire
coagulation profile changes more significantly with bleeding/clotting events becoming less
predictable. In this review, we discuss several aspects of coagulation management in patients with
ESLD.

Hypercoagulability in end stage liver disease: pathophysiology and susceptible populations.

End Stage Liver disease can be associated with both severe bleeding and clotting. The majority
of coagulation and anticoagulation factors are produced in the liver. Despite a reduction in the
production of most of these factors in ESLD and defects in primary secondary, and tertiary
coagulation, the coagulation system is most often stable. Some of coagulation factors produced
extrahepatic and this is one of the main reasons why hepatic failure is not necessarily associated only
with spontaneous unprovoked bleeding, but with clotting as well [1]. One of the first publications
demonstrating that patients with ESLD are not naturally anticoagulated but prone to venous
thromboembolism (VTE) was published in 2009 by Northup et al [2].. The authors found that the
incidence of VTE in hospitalized cirrhotic patients was 0.5%. Most of these patients also had a low
serum albumin level (most likely a surrogate marker for circulating anticoagulants). In an evaluation
(2009) based on the Danish National Register, Søgaard et al. demonstrated that both patients with
cirrhosis and not-cirrhotic chronic liver disease had a high risk of developing VTE (relative risk for

© 2023 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

thromboses 2.06 and 2.10 respectively) in comparison to matched controls from the general
population [3]. An association between chronic liver disease and VTE was later confirmed in several
publications with an incidence of between 0.5% and 8% [4–7].
If patients with ESLD require a LT, the concern for perioperative thrombotic or bleeding
complications is even higher. In fact, different types of thromboses have been described during each
stage of transplant surgery.
Portal vein thromboses (PVT) are more frequently seen preoperatively with a prevalence of
between 1% and 16%, occurring more frequently in patients with decompensated disease [8,9]. An
association between preoperative PVT and increased postoperative mortality has been demonstrated
[10–12].
Intraoperative thrombotic complications with clinical presentation occur with a frequency of 1%
and 6% [13,14]. However, if transesophageal echocardiography is routinely used during surgery, a
variety of clots have been seen in almost half of all cases with the majority not needing any treatment
[15]. Symptomatic clots, in form of pulmonary emboli (PE) or intracardiac thromboses, can occur at
each stage of LT surgery, but are most frequently described at the time of graft reperfusion and are
associated with significant hemodynamic instability and a high mortality rate [16].
Different types of thrombotic complications occur postoperatively. It has been demonstrated
that preoperative PVT is associated with postoperative thrombotic complications [10,17,18].
Postoperative thromboses can manifest in the form of PVT (2%)[17], hepatic artery thromboses (HAT)
(3%-6% and over 8% in children),[19,20] and VTE (5%-10%)[21]. Many of these complications are
associated with increased mortality. The incidence of PE after LT is about 4%[16] with an associated
one-year mortality rate as high as 12% [22]. Early (within 90 days after LT) HAT is associated with
graft failure and requires retransplantation with a rate above 50% for adults and above 60% in
children [17,19]. The development of postoperative thromboses (especially HAT) is significantly
affected by surgical technique and perioperative management.
Although the cause of hypercoagulability in ESLD is multifactorial, endothelial dysfunction
(ED) is most likely the main driving mechanism of clotting in cirrhotic patients. The pressure gradient
between the systemic and portal circulation results in increasing intravascular shear forces resulting
in activation of nitric oxide (NO) production and the development of ED [23]. Increased NO levels
lead to significant vasodilation, primarily in the portal circulation, resulting in a “steal effect” in the
systemic circulation. Low systemic pressure is responsible for a dramatic decrease in perfusion of
the intestines which is associated with increased mucosal permeability, release of endotoxins, and
secondary activation of the NO pathway resulting in an even higher degree of systemic hypotension
and ED [24]. Other factors contributing to the development of ED in cirrhotic patients are increased
inflammatory and oxidative stress [25]. Endotoxemia itself is associated with increased thrombin
generation [26] which is one of the major factors in hypercoagulability. Additionally, ED in patients
with ESLD is also associated with resistance to thrombomodulin (TM) (a membrane protein
expressed on the surface of endothelial cells) that serves as a co-factor for protein C activation with
subsequent impairment of the anticoagulation pathway and increase in thrombin generation [27,28].
Additionally, both hepatic production of proteins C and S, and antithrombin III (ATIII), and their
activity, are significantly reduced in ESLD [29]. Another ED-related factor contributing to
hypercoagulability in cirrhosis is the significantly increased production of endothelium liver-
independent coagulation or anticoagulation factors such as Factor (F) FVIII, von Willebrand factor
(vWF), as well as plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) [30–32]. VWF is likely one of the key
components of hypercoagulability in cirrhosis. Despite thrombocytopenia and impaired platelet
function in vitro [33], in vivo, platelet function is likely normal or even increased due to a high
concentration of vWF (not just because of increased production but also because of decreased
destruction by cleaving protease ADAMTS13 synthetized in the liver) [29,34].
FVIII is one of the targets of activated protein C. In ESLD, the ratio between FVIII and activated
protein C (which indicates the severity of cirrhosis) can reach 5.0. This imbalance is an additional
factor responsible for the impairment of thrombin generation inhibition [35,36].
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

In addition to primary and secondary coagulation, tertiary coagulation is significantly affected

in cirrhosis. An increase in PAI-1 levels in combination with reduced levels of tissue plasminogen
activator is responsible for decreased fibrinolysis in patients with ESLD [37,38]. It has been also
shown that patients with ESLD have increased clot stability due to diminished permeability and
reduced lysis [39,40].
There are number of subpopulations of patients with ESLD predisposed to developing
thromboses. It has been demonstrated that patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have
an increased prevalence of DVT, PE, and PVT [41–43]. The reason for this is inflammation and
increased oxidative stress that occurs with NASH at a higher degree than in patients with other
types of ESLD [37,44].. Other subpopulations prone to thrombotic complications include patients
with autoimmune conditions (due to chronic inflammation, cytokine release, and high fibrinogen
concentration [45,46]) and patients with hepatitis C (due to chronic inflammation and production of
autoantibodies such anticardiolipins and increased thrombin generation) [47,48].
Several genetic mutations associated with thromboses (mostly VTE and PVT) are frequently
seen in patients with ESLD. These include FV Leiden [49], Prothrombin G20210A mutation (leads to
high prothrombin level)[50], high plasma homocysteine level [51], a mutation in the
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene [51], JAK2V617F mutations [52], as well as
myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) [53]. Due to chronic hypercoagulability associated with
ESLD, these mutations make patients with cirrhosis more susceptible to thromboses than the general
population.

Monitoring of Hemostasis in Patients with End-Stage-Liver-Disease

Although standard laboratory tests (SLTs) have never been formally evaluated for predicting
bleeding or for treatment, these tests are mainly used for managing patients with severe trauma,
cardiac surgery, and liver-related hemostasis disorders. Tests such as the prothrombin time (PT),
activated partial thrombin time (aPTT), international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen, and platelet
count have significant limitations with regard to evaluating clot formation and kinetics as well as clot
strength [54].
SLTs do not accurately reflect the coagulation status of patients with ESLD. Platelet number do
not correlate with platelets function, and fibrinogen levels do not accurately reflect structurally
normal fibrinogen or dysfibrinogenemia (compounds with impaired fibrinogen polymerization) that
are significantly increased in ESLD [55,56]. Another significant limitation of SLTs is the time
necessary to complete the analysis. While the turnaround time for viscoelastic testing (VET) is 7-10
minutes, the turnaround time for SLTs depends on local facilities and can take between 60 and 90
minutes [57,58].
In patients with ESLD, SLTs only provide a limited reflection of the current coagulation concept.
Since 2001, a cell-based instead of a cascade-based coagulation model has been accepted as the
standard concept [59]. According to the cell-based system, coagulation is divided into three phases:
activation, propagation, and amplification. The activation phase begins with tissue factor release
from a variety of cells which interacts with FVIIa resulting in subsequent activation of FIX, FX, and
prothrombin (FII). Prothrombin release is followed by fibrin production. In the propagation phase,
prothrombin activates platelets that used as a matrix where all metabolic processes can then occur.
This is followed by activation of FV and FVIII to FVIIIa, F IXa, and F Va/Xa which leads to further
release of thrombin. In the amplification phase, the release of thrombin is repeated as a positive
feedback mechanism until thrombin achieves a 1000-fold higher concentration compared to baseline
(thrombin burst). After the thrombin burst, a fibrin clot is formed (Figure 1). SLTs (such as PT and
aPTT) assess only the initiation phase but not the other phases of coagulation and cannot give a
complete picture of the status of coagulation ( Figure 2).
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

Figure 1. Cell-based coagulation process. The waterfall cascade hemostasis model was replaced 2001
with a cell-based model [59]. The coagulation process begins with release of Tissue Factor from
endothelial cells, monocytes, and macrophages. Tissue Factor then starts with the initiation phase
with F VIIa. Propagation and amplification follow ending with a thrombin burst. The fibrin net is then
built and stabilized with F XIII.

Figure 2. Standard laboratory tests assess only 5-10% of the coagulation process, while viscoelastic
tests, like Rotem, assess the whole coagulation process. TAT: Thrombin-Anti-Thrombin; PT:
Prothrombin time; aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time.

One of the first studies which challenged the use of SLTs for predicting bleeding was published
in 1981. Ewe et al. attempted to determine if the bleeding time was dependent on platelet number
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

and prothrombin time (PT) during a laparoscopic procedure in 200 cirrhotic patients having a liver
biopsy performed with a 1.8 mm Meninghi needle [60]. The authors found no correlation between
bleeding time and PT or platelet number. Two patients had a bleeding time of > 12 minutes (mean 4
minutes 37 sec.) although their SLTs hemostatic values (PT and platelet count) were normal.
One of the most important papers contributing to our understanding of coagulation in patients
with ESLD was published by Tripodi et al [1].. The authors evaluated endogenous thrombin
generation in cirrhotic patients and healthy volunteers. The level of thrombin generation in healthy
volunteers was significantly higher compared to cirrhotic patients. This difference, however,
disappeared when TM was added to the assay. When thrombin binds to the TM receptor, protein C
is activated. This then inhibits Factor Va and Factor VIIIa. These data have demonstrated that in
cirrhotic patients, both pro- and anticoagulants are reduced.
SLTs are not designed to assess levels of anticoagulants. This is the main reason why these tests
are able to show a potential predisposition to coagulopathy, but not a hypercoagulable condition.
Haas et al. performed a met-analysis regarding using SLTs to predict bleeding events [61]. The
authors were able to identify 11 guidelines and 64 studies evaluating the use of SLTs to predict
bleeding. There were only 3 prospective studies with a total of only 108 patients included with no
clear results. The authors concluded that SLTs were unsuitable for this purpose.
In contrast to SLTs, VET can overcome most of these disadvantages. In comparison to SLTs, VET
dynamically assesses hemostasis in whole blood, not only in plasma, and includes the interaction
between pro-, anticoagulants, and platelets. VET assesses the entire coagulation process to identify
which part is disrupted which allows for targeted therapy. Dr. Kang (working in Pittsburgh at this
time) was the first to report the advantages of VET for perioperative management of LT [62]. In 1985,
he reported that transfusion requirements were reduced by 33% if VET was used. In a randomized
controlled trial (RCT), De Pietrie et al. evaluated cirrhotic patients who underwent invasive
procedures. Sixty patients were 1:1 randomized to guide hemostasis management based on VET or
SLTs [63]. Patients in the VET group received significantly fewer RBC, FFP, and platelet transfusions
compared to the SLT group. Post-intervention hemoglobin in the VET group was considerably higher
compared to the SLT group. Bleeding events were not significantly different between groups. Similar
results were reported by Kumar et al [64]. These authors were able to demonstrate that VET- guided
hemostasis management in cirrhotic patients with non-variceal bleeding could significantly reduce
the number of transfused blood products without increasing the incidence of bleeding events. Similar
findings were shown in children who underwent invasive procedures where VET-guided hemostasis
management was associated with a significantly reduced rate of blood product transfusion [65].
Currently, two VET devices are available, TEG and ROTEM. Hemostasis management with
these two systems was assessed by Wikkelsø et al. in a Cochrane Database Systematic Review [66].
They enrolled 17 studies with a total of 1493 patients primarily having cardiac surgical procedures.
Their analysis demonstrated reduced mortality (3.9% vs. 7.4%, RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28-0.95) and
significantly reduced transfusion rate of any blood product (red blood cells (RBC), fresh frozen
plasma (FFP), or platelets) when TEG or ROTEM were used.
Karkouti et al. performed an RCT on patients having cardiac surgery and demonstrated reduced
transfusion requirement when VET was used [67]. Serraino et al. compared SLTs and VET in 8737
patients undergoing cardiac surgery and also demonstrated a decreased need for RBC and platelet
transfusion. However, no difference in mortality, prevalence of stroke, time on a ventilator, hospital
stay, or incidence of bleeding could not be demonstrated [68]. This report sparked a discussion
among experts. In this study, the relative risk for mortality was 0.55 with a 95% CI of 0.28-1.1. If,
however, the number of patients would have been larger, differences in mortality would have been
significant [69]. It was also emphasized that reducing the rate of RBC and platelet transfusion was
associated with a significant decrease in acute renal failure (RR= 0.42, 95% CI 0.2-0.86) and correlated
with a better outcome [70].
Although the advantages of VET were already shown in 1985, and since then, several
evaluations and metanalysis have demonstrated the beneficial effects of VET in reducing blood
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

product transfusion as well as for decreasing morbidity and mortality, many LT centers are still
reluctant to use of VET and rely on SLTs.

Hemostasis in Cirrhotic Patients with Sepsis

Patients with cirrhosis present with a persistent systemic inflammatory state and with different
degrees of both innate and acquired immune dysfunction that is influenced by the severity of the
liver disease. Portal hypertension, increased permeability of the intestine, and altered gut microbiota
lead to intestinal bacteria translocation, endotoxemia, and worsening of systemic inflammation
which is the typical pathophysiology of severe infections in patients with cirrhosis [71–73]. It has
been previously demonstrated that sepsis is diagnosed in one-third of hospitalized cirrhotic patients
[74]. Although sepsis is frequent in patients with ESLD, these patients have been underrepresented
in sepsis and septic shock trials. The early diagnosis of organ dysfunction induced by sepsis is
challenging in cirrhotic patients because, at the time of diagnosis, they have already hematologic
changes caused by chronic liver disease. Coagulation disturbances in septic patients with cirrhosis
are the result of coagulation activation induced by sepsis superimposed on an already altered
hemostasis due to hepatic dysfunction. These changes in coagulation are dependent on the severity
of both liver disease and infection and are not adequately evaluated by SLTs. VET and thrombin
generation assay are global tests that can better reflect the hemostatic changes induced by sepsis or
severe infection in patients with cirrhosis.
Unfortunately, there are not many studies assessing coagulation changes in septic cirrhotic
patients, and some of these were published more than 20 years ago [75–77]. Taking into account the
heterogeneity of patients with liver disease and concomitant severe infections, sepsis, or septic shock,
it is difficult to have a complete picture of the hemostatic system in this patient population.
In patients without liver disease, severe infections result in coagulation activation mainly
through the extrinsic pathway, with inhibition of natural anticoagulants and hypofibrinolysis [78,79].
Severe infections occurring in patients with compensated liver disease affect their hemostatic
balance which often results in bleeding or thrombotic complications. In patients with decompensated
cirrhosis, severe infections usually lead to a deterioration in SLTs, platelet count, and parameters of
VET indicating hypocoagulability [75,77,80]. Resolving infection is associated with improvement in
coagulopathy, while in patients continuing to deteriorate, hemostasis worsens [75]. In a study using
thrombelastography, viscoelastic parameters reflecting clotting initiation and propagation (r, k,
alpha) were more useful than SLTs to identify significant hemostatic changes in patients with
persistent infection [75]. This reinforces the fact that VET is more sensitive for coagulation assessment
in cirrhotic patients. When compared to cirrhotic patients without infections, or having mild
infections, cirrhotic patients with sepsis have lower levels of pro- and anticoagulant factors, lower
platelet counts, and increased soluble fibrin, independent of the severity of the liver disease [81].
These findings suggest that inflammation-induced coagulation activation leads to the consumption
of coagulation factors and platelets in cirrhotic patients with severe infections or sepsis [81].
Sepsis causes 25-30% of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). About 50% of patients with ACLF
from other causes will develop sepsis in the course of the disease [82]. A more recent study has
demonstrated that patients with ACLF, presenting with an already decompensated hemostatic
system, have further aggravation of coagulopathy by sepsis [80]. When compared to ACLF in patients
without sepsis, patients with sepsis have been shown to have worse SLTs, but the differences were
not statistically significant [80]. When compared to non-septic patients with ACLF presenting with
hypocoagulability (confirmed by VET), patients with sepsis had more severely disturbed hemostasis
manifested by longer clotting times and lower clot amplitude on thrombelastography [80]..
Measurement of individual coagulation factors demonstrate that patients with ACLF have decreased
levels of protein C and AT III, as well as increased levels of von vWF, FVIII, and tissue factor activity.
All these parameters worsened significantly in patients who developed sepsis and this deterioration
correlated with increased mortality at 28 days [80].
A recent study comparing patients with decompensated cirrhosis with and without infections
revealed decreased levels of natural anticoagulants (protein C, S and, ATIII), FVII, and prolonged
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

INR in infected patients, that normalized with infection resolution [83]. However, in this study the
decrease of anticoagulants was not correlated with a higher degree of thrombin generation, which
was similar in infected and non-infected patients [83].
In non-cirrhotic patients, sepsis leads to defects in platelet aggregation [84]. Similarly, patients
with decompensated cirrhosis and bacterial infections present with decreased whole blood platelet
aggregation when compared to cirrhotic patients without infections [83] This could be explained by
the increased release of NO and prostacyclin induced by bacterial endotoxins in infected patients
with cirrhosis, contributing to further impairment of primary hemostasis [71,85]. As opposite to
secondary hemostasis which improved after infection resolution, a further impairment of platelet
aggregation was noted in cirrhotic patients that recovered from infection independently of baseline
platelet count and agonist used [83].
It is known that severe infections and sepsis in patients without liver cirrhosis are usually
accompanied by hypofibrinolysis. Infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis present mixed
fibrinolytic changes, with lower plasminogen levels, higher levels of tissue plasminogen activator,
and similar levels of plasmin-antiplasmin complexes compared to non-infected patients [83].
Bacterial infection is associated with a significant heparin-like effect in chronic liver disease,
impairing coagulation due to the release of endogenous heparinoids from endothelial surfaces, and
possibly due to activation of mast cells with subsequent release of heparin and other mediators
[76,77]. In their study, Montalto et al, demonstrated the presence of a heparin-like effect due to
endogenous heparinoids using heparanase-modified thrombelastography in cirrhotic patients with
severe infections, but not in non-infected cirrhotic patients or in infected patients without cirrhosis
[77]. This heparin-like effect disappeared after the resolution of the infection [77]. These results were
confirmed by Zambruni et al. who were able to demonstrate higher anti-Xa levels in infected
compared to non-infected cirrhotic patients [76]. Endotoxin or cytokines are involved in the release
of heparinoids from endothelial surfaces in a dose-dependent manner. This may be the reason why
this effect was not shown in non-infected cirrhotic patients (having lower endotoxin levels). In non-
cirrhotic patients with infections, this effect was not demonstrated because, with unaltered liver
function, clearance of heparinoids is not affected [77]. These findings are important for explaining the
increased bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients with severe infections.
Sepsis is the most common cause of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). In DIC, both
coagulation factors and platelet counts are decreased mainly due to consumption. This, in
combination with increased fibrinolytic activity, represents the routine diagnostic criteria for DIC
[86,87]. Diagnosing DIC in the presence of chronic liver disease is challenging due to the similarities
in coagulation tests with both conditions. The problem of diagnosing DIC becomes even more
complicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF. In these cases, DIC is often over-
diagnosed with the usual DIC scoring systems. It is not surprising then that the diagnosis of DIC is
often missed in patients with sepsis and ACLF, as the coagulation markers in ACLF patients can be
severely altered even before they develop an infection.
In conclusion, patients with ESLD are prone to hypercoagulability on the level of primary,
secondary, and tertiary hemostasis. Despite decreases in both coagulation and anticoagulation factors
in the liver, these patients have an imbalanced system prone to both bleeding and clotting. ED
dysfunction and increase thrombin generation play a central role in hypercoagulability associated
with ESLD. SLTs do not accurately reflect the coagulation profile of patients with ESLD. VET is more
reliable than SLTs for managing coagulation in this patient population. VET is particularly helpful in
patients with ESLD complicated by sepsis, a situation with very complex coagulation disturbances.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, FHS, DB, and ES; Methodology, FHS and DB; Formal Analysis, AF
and KW; Investigation, FHS, DB, ES, and DCB; Writing-original draft preparation, FHS, DB, and ES.; Writing-
FHS, DB, and ES; Visualization, DCB. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement: Review article: no IRB statement needed.

Informed Consent Statement: Review report - no informed consent required.

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

Data Availability Statement: No own dataset

Conflicts of Interest: FS has served as a speaker for CSL Behring, Werfen, Biotest, and Merz Pharmaceuticals
and ES has served as a speaker for CSL Behring. Neither have conflicts of interest. The remaining authors declare
no competing interests.

References
1. Tripodi A, Salerno F, Chantarangkul V, et al. Evidence of normal thrombin generation in cirrhosis despite
abnormal conventional coagulation tests. Hepatology. 2005;41:553-558.
2. Northup PG, McMahon MM, Ruhl AP, et al. Coagulopathy does not fully protect hospitalized cirrhosis
patients from peripheral venous thromboembolism. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2006;101:1524-
1528; quiz 1680.
3. Sogaard KK, Horvath-Puho E, Gronbaek H, Jepsen P, Vilstrup H, Sorensen HT. Risk of venous
thromboembolism in patients with liver disease: a nationwide population-based case-control study. The
American journal of gastroenterology. 2009;104:96-101.
4. Sogaard KK, Horvath-Puho E, Montomoli J, Vilstrup H, Sorensen HT. Cirrhosis is Associated with an
Increased 30-Day Mortality After Venous Thromboembolism. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6:e97.
5. Wu H, Nguyen GC. Liver cirrhosis is associated with venous thromboembolism among hospitalized
patients in a nationwide US study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:800-805.
6. Dabbagh O, Oza A, Prakash S, Sunna R, Saettele TM. Coagulopathy does not protect against venous
thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease. Chest. 2010;137:1145-1149.
7. Gulley D, Teal E, Suvannasankha A, Chalasani N, Liangpunsakul S. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary
embolism in cirrhosis patients. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2008;53:3012-3017.
8. Mantaka A, Augoustaki A, Kouroumalis EA, Samonakis DN. Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: diagnosis,
natural history, and therapeutic challenges. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31:315-329.
9. Zhang Y, Xu BY, Wang XB, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients
With Cirrhosis and Acute Decompensation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:2564-2572 e2561.
10. Stine JG, Pelletier SJ, Schmitt TM, Porte RJ, Northup PG. Pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis is an
independent risk factor for graft loss due to hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients. HPB
(Oxford). 2016;18:279-286.
11. Stine JG, Shah PM, Cornella SL, et al. Portal vein thrombosis, mortality and hepatic decompensation in
patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:2774-2780.
12. Chardot C, Herrera JM, Debray D, et al. Portal vein complications after liver transplantation for biliary
atresia. Liver transplantation and surgery : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver
Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society. 1997;3:351-358.
13. Gologorsky E, De Wolf AM, Scott V, Aggarwal S, Dishart M, Kang Y. Intracardiac thrombus formation and
pulmonary thromboembolism immediately after graft reperfusion in 7 patients undergoing liver
transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:783-789.
14. Lerner AB, Sundar E, Mahmood F, Sarge T, Hanto DW, Panzica PJ. Four cases of cardiopulmonary
thromboembolism during liver transplantation without the use of antifibrinolytic drugs. Anesthesia and
analgesia. 2005;101:1608-1612.
15. Shillcutt SK, Ringenberg KJ, Chacon MM, et al. Liver Transplantation: Intraoperative Transesophageal
Echocardiography Findings and Relationship to Major Postoperative Adverse Cardiac Events. J
Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:107-114.
16. Sakai T, Matsusaki T, Dai F, et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism during adult liver transplantation:
incidence, clinical presentation, outcome, risk factors, and diagnostic predictors. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:469-
477.
17. Duffy JP, Hong JC, Farmer DG, et al. Vascular complications of orthotopic liver transplantation: experience
in more than 4,200 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:896-903; discussion 903-895.
18. Bezinover D, Iskandarani K, Chinchilli V, et al. Autoimmune conditions are associated with perioperative
thrombotic complications in liver transplant recipients: A UNOS database analysis. BMC Anesthesiol.
2016;16:26.
19. Bekker J, Ploem S, de Jong KP. Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic
review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the
American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2009;9:746-757.
20. Iida T, Kaido T, Yagi S, et al. Hepatic arterial complications in adult living donor liver transplant recipients:
a single-center experience of 673 cases. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:1025-1030.
21. Salami A, Qureshi W, Kuriakose P, Moonka D, Yoshida A, Abouljoud M. Frequency and predictors of
venous thromboembolism in orthotopic liver transplant recipients: a single-center retrospective review.
Transplant Proc. 2013;45:315-319.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

22. Naess IA, Christiansen SC, Romundstad P, Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Hammerstrom J. Incidence and
mortality of venous thrombosis: a population-based study. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.
2007;5:692-699.
23. Mookerjee RP, Vairappan B, Jalan R. The puzzle of endothelial nitric oxide synthase dysfunction in portal
hypertension: The missing piece? Hepatology. 2007;46:943-946.
24. Harrison P, Wendon J, Williams R. Evidence of increased guanylate cyclase activation by acetylcysteine in
fulminant hepatic failure. Hepatology. 1996;23:1067-1072.
25. Clapp BR, Hingorani AD, Kharbanda RK, et al. Inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction involves
reduced nitric oxide bioavailability and increased oxidant stress. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;64:172-178.
26. Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, et al. Ongoing prothrombotic state in the portal circulation of cirrhotic patients.
Thrombosis and haemostasis. 1997;77:44-47.
27. Tripodi A. Hemostasis in Acute and Chronic Liver Disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2017;37:28-32.
28. Tripodi A, Anstee QM, Sogaard KK, Primignani M, Valla DC. Hypercoagulability in cirrhosis: causes and
consequences. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2011;9:1713-1723.
29. Raparelli V, Basili S, Carnevale R, et al. Low-grade endotoxemia and platelet activation in cirrhosis.
Hepatology. 2017;65:571-581.
30. Saner FH, Gieseler RK, Akiz H, Canbay A, Gorlinger K. Delicate balance of bleeding and thrombosis in
end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation. Digestion. 2013;88:135-144.
31. Hollestelle MJ, Geertzen HG, Straatsburg IH, van Gulik TM, van Mourik JA. Factor VIII expression in liver
disease. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2004;91:267-275.
32. Tripodi A, Mannucci PM. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. The New England journal of medicine.
2011;365:147-156.
33. Laffi G, Cominelli F, Ruggiero M, et al. Altered platelet function in cirrhosis of the liver: impairment of
inositol lipid and arachidonic acid metabolism in response to agonists. Hepatology. 1988;8:1620-1626.
34. Lisman T, Bongers TN, Adelmeijer J, et al. Elevated levels of von Willebrand Factor in cirrhosis support
platelet adhesion despite reduced functional capacity. Hepatology. 2006;44:53-61.
35. Tripodi A, Primignani M, Chantarangkul V, et al. An imbalance of pro- vs. anti-coagulation factors in
plasma from patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:2105-2111.
36. Tripodi A, Primignani M, Lemma L, et al. Detection of the imbalance of procoagulant versus anticoagulant
factors in cirrhosis by a simple laboratory method. Hepatology. 2010;52:249-255.
37. Kotronen A, Joutsi-Korhonen L, Sevastianova K, et al. Increased coagulation factor VIII, IX, XI and XII
activities in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2011;31:176-183.
38. Cigolini M, Targher G, Agostino G, Tonoli M, Muggeo M, De Sandre G. Liver steatosis and its relation to
plasma haemostatic factors in apparently healthy men--role of the metabolic syndrome. Thrombosis and
haemostasis. 1996;76:69-73.
39. Hugenholtz GC, Macrae F, Adelmeijer J, et al. Procoagulant changes in fibrin clot structure in patients with
cirrhosis are associated with oxidative modifications of fibrinogen. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis :
JTH. 2016;14:1054-1066.
40. Undas A, Nowakowski T, Ciesla-Dul M, Sadowski J. Abnormal plasma fibrin clot characteristics are
associated with worse clinical outcome in patients with peripheral arterial disease and thromboangiitis
obliterans. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215:481-486.
41. Stine JG, Shah NL, Argo CK, Pelletier SJ, Caldwell SH, Northup PG. Increased risk of portal vein thrombosis
in patients with cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:1016-1021.
42. Stine JG, Argo CK, Pelletier SJ, Maluf DG, Caldwell SH, Northup PG. Advanced non-alcoholic
steatohepatitis cirrhosis: A high-risk population for pre-liver transplant portal vein thrombosis. World J
Hepatol. 2017;9:139-146.
43. Stine JG, Niccum BA, Zimmet AN, et al. Increased risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients
with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018;9:140.
44. Tripodi A, Fracanzani AL, Primignani M, et al. Procoagulant imbalance in patients with non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease. Journal of hepatology. 2014;61:148-154.
45. Biagini MR, Tozzi A, Marcucci R, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and hypercoagulability in primary biliary
cirrhosis. World journal of gastroenterology. 2006;12:1607-1612.
46. Zoller B, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Autoimmune diseases and venous thromboembolism: a review of
the literature. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;2:171-183.
47. Prieto J, Yuste JR, Beloqui O, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies in chronic hepatitis C: implication of hepatitis
C virus as the cause of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Hepatology. 1996;23:199-204.
48. Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, et al. Increased rate of thrombin generation in hepatitis C virus cirrhotic patients.
Relationship to venous thrombosis. J Investig Med. 1995;43:550-554.
49. Dahlback B. Advances in understanding pathogenic mechanisms of thrombophilic disorders. Blood.
2008;112:19-27.
50. Walker AP. Portal vein thrombosis: what is the role of genetics? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:705-707.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

10

51. Amitrano L, Brancaccio V, Guardascione MA, et al. Inherited coagulation disorders in cirrhotic patients
with portal vein thrombosis. Hepatology. 2000;31:345-348.
52. Qi X, Yang Z, Bai M, Shi X, Han G, Fan D. Meta-analysis: the significance of screening for JAK2V617F
mutation in Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal venous system thrombosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2011;33:1087-1103.
53. Qi X, Li H, Liu X, et al. Novel insights into the development of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis patients.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9:1421-1432.
54. Saner FH, Abeysundara L, Hartmann M, Mallett SV. Rational approach to transfusion in liver
transplantation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84:378-388.
55. Saner FH, Bezinover D. Assessment and management of coagulopathy in critically-ill patients with liver
failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25:179-186.
56. Palascak JE, Martinez J. Dysfibrinogenemia associated with liver disease. J Clin Invest. 1977;60:89-95.
57. Reed MJ, Nimmo AF, McGee D, et al. Rotational thrombolelastometry produces potentially clinical useful
results within 10 min in bleeding emergency department patients: the DEUCE study. Eur J Emerg Med.
2013;20:160-166.
58. Haas T, Spielmann N, Mauch J, et al. Comparison of thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) with standard
plasmatic coagulation testing in paediatric surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:36-41.
59. Hoffman M, Monroe DM, 3rd. A cell-based model of hemostasis. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2001;85:958-
965.
60. Ewe K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Digestive
diseases and sciences. 1981;26:388-393.
61. Haas T, Fries D, Tanaka KA, Asmis L, Curry NS, Schochl H. Usefulness of standard plasma coagulation
tests in the management of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding: is there any evidence? Br J Anaesth.
2015;114:217-224.
62. Kang YG, Martin DJ, Marquez J, et al. Intraoperative changes in blood coagulation and
thrombelastographic monitoring in liver transplantation. Anesthesia and analgesia. 1985;64:888-896.
63. De Pietri L, Bianchini M, Montalti R, et al. Thrombelastography-guided blood product use before invasive
procedures in cirrhosis with severe coagulopathy: A randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. 2016;63:566-
573.
64. Kumar M, Ahmad J, Maiwall R, et al. Thromboelastography-Guided Blood Component Use in Patients
With Cirrhosis With Nonvariceal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Hepatology. 2020;71:235-246.
65. Maria A, Lal BB, Khanna R, et al. Rotational thromboelastometry-guided blood component use in cirrhotic
children undergoing invasive procedures: Randomized controlled trial. Liver Int. 2022;42:2492-2500.
66. Wikkelso A, Wetterslev J, Moller AM, Afshari A. Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry
(ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic treatment versus usual care in adults or children with bleeding. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD007871.
67. Karkouti K, Callum J, Wijeysundera DN, et al. Point-of-Care Hemostatic Testing in Cardiac Surgery: A
Stepped-Wedge Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2016;134:1152-1162.
68. Serraino GF, Murphy GJ. Routine use of viscoelastic blood tests for diagnosis and treatment of
coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth.
2017;118:823-833.
69. Ranucci M. Bank blood shortage, transfusion containment and viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation
testing in cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:814-815.
70. Kozek S, Schoechl H, Gratz J. Response to: Routine use of viscoelastic blood tests for diagnosis and
treatment of coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br
J Anaesth. 2017;119:543-544.
71. Thalheimer U, Triantos CK, Samonakis DN, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Infection, coagulation, and variceal
bleeding in cirrhosis. Gut. 2005;54:556-563.
72. Miranda-Zazueta G, León-Garduño LAPd, Aguirre-Valadez J, Torre-Delgadillo A. Bacterial infections in
cirrhosis: Current treatment. Annals of Hepatology. 2020;19:238-244.
73. Wong F, Bernardi M, Balk R, et al. Sepsis in cirrhosis: report on the 7th meeting of the International Ascites
Club. Gut. 2005;54:718.
74. Safi W, Elnegouly M, Schellnegger R, et al. Infection and Predictors of Outcome of Cirrhotic Patients after
Emergency Care Hospital Admission. Ann Hepatol. 2018;17:948-958.
75. Papatheodoridis GV, Patch D, Webster GJ, Brooker J, Barnes E, Burroughs AK. Infection and hemostasis in
decompensated cirrhosis: a prospective study using thrombelastography. Hepatology. 1999;29:1085-1090.
76. Zambruni A, Thalheimer U, Coppell J, et al. Endogenous heparin-like activity detected by anti-Xa assay in
infected cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 2009;39:830-836.
77. Montalto P, Vlachogiannakos J, Cox DJ, Pastacaldi S, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Bacterial infection in cirrhosis
impairs coagulation by a heparin effect: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2002;37:463-470.
78. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:840-851.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 July 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202307.1050.v1

11

79. Levi M. The coagulant response in sepsis and inflammation. Hamostaseologie. 2010;30:10-12, 14-16.
80. Premkumar M, Saxena P, Rangegowda D, et al. Coagulation failure is associated with bleeding events and
clinical outcome during systemic inflammatory response and sepsis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: An
observational cohort study. Liver Int. 2019;39:694-704.
81. Plessier A, Denninger MH, Consigny Y, et al. Coagulation disorders in patients with cirrhosis and severe
sepsis. Liver International. 2003;23:440-448.
82. Dong V, Karvellas CJ. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Objective admission and support criteria in the
intensive care unit. JHEP Rep. 2019;1:44-52.
83. Zanetto A, Campello E, Bulato C, et al. Global hemostatic profiling in patients with decompensated
cirrhosis and bacterial infections. JHEP Reports. 2022;4.
84. Vincent JL, Yagushi A, Pradier O. Platelet function in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:S313-317.
85. Kujovich JL. Coagulopathy in liver disease: a balancing act. Hematology. 2015;2015:243-249.
86. Iba T, Levi M, Levy JH. Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2020;46:89-95.
87. Taylor FB, Jr., Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H, Levi M. Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria,
and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:1327-1330.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those
of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s)
disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or
products referred to in the content.