Civics, L-7, Outcomes of Democracy
Civics, L-7, Outcomes of Democracy
Civics, L-7, Outcomes of Democracy
For e.g.: China’s famine of 1958-1961 was the worst recorded famine in world history.
During those days, India’s economic condition was not much better than China Yet India
did not have a famine. Economists think that this was a result of different government
policies in the two countries. The existence of democracy in India made the Indian
government respond to food scarcity. If China too had multiparty elections, an opposition
party and a press free to criticise the government, then so many people may not have died
in the famine
4. How many democracies are there in the world? Are they identical?
Over a hundred countries of the world today claim and practice some kind of democratic
politics: they have formal constitutions, they hold elections, they have parties and they
guarantee rights of citizens. While these features are common to most of them, these
democracies are very much different from each other in terms of their social situations, their
economic achievements and their cultures. Clearly, what may be achieved or not achieved
under each of these democracies will be very different
6. Answer the following question on the cartoon on page 90 titled ‘Is democracy all about
coping with multiple pressures and accommodating diverse demands?’
i) What is shown in the given cartoon?
The cartoon throws a light on the issues faced in a democracy. It includes the Indian
examples- language dispute, separatist movements, students' demands, border disputes
with different countries, excesses made by the police and bureaucrats.
10. Answer the following questions on cartoon on page 91 titled ‘Government Secrecy’?
i) What is shown in this cartoon?
It shows how the government is keeping an eye on the citizens through a lens/
telescope and knows each and every detail about the but the citizens on the other hand
do not have any such information about the government.
ii) Can you think of what and how the government knows about you and your
family?
The government of India has various tools through which information about the
citizens can be taken, for example - Aadhar cards, ration cards and voter identity
cards etc. Every ten years, the government conducts census. In this census, there are
records of each adult member of the family along with his/her sex, age and education.
There is a provision of registering birth, marriage and death of the family members
with the government institutions.
iii) What are the sources of information for you about the government?
Right to Information, information on government websites, newspapers etc. Political
leaders either local or national are the main sources information to the common
people. They make them aware of the polices and decisions taken by the government.
15. What can be expected from democracies? State 1 evil that exists in democracies?
In substantive terms it may be reasonable to expect from democracy a government that is
attentive to the needs and demands of the people and is largely free of corruption. The record
of democracies is not impressive on these two counts. Democracies often frustrate the needs
of the people and often ignore the demands of a majority of its population. The routine tales
of corruption are enough to convince us that democracy is not free of this evil. At the same
time, there is nothing to show that non-democracies are less corrupt or more sensitive to the
people.
16. Why is there a overwhelming support for democracy all over the globe?
OR
‘Democracy’s ability to generate its own support is itself an outcome that cannot be
ignored’ Justify?
OR
Describe 1 respect in which democracy is certainly better than its competitors?
i) There is one respect in which democratic government is certainly better than its
alternatives: democratic government is legitimate government.
ii) It may be slow, less efficient, not always very responsive or clean. But a democratic
government is people’s own government.
iii) That is why there is an overwhelming support for the idea of democracy all over the
world.
iv) As the accompanying evidence from South Asia shows, the support exists in countries
with democratic regimes as well as countries without democratic regimes.
v) People wish to be ruled by representatives elected by them.
vi) They also believe that democracy is suitable for their country. Democracy’s ability to
generate its own support is itself an outcome that cannot be ignored.
18. What does the cartoon on page 93 titled ‘The rich get buff convey’?
i) What does these cartoons represent?
It talks about the economic growth and income distribution gains of 2000-2006, It tells us
about the disparities between the rich and poor. The rich are getting richer and poor are
getting poorer. The economic gains are distributed in society in such a way that this inequality
fails to disappear.
iii) How can the poor get a voice for a better share in a nation?
The poor will get better share in democratic nation when they will be given proper
representation and also, they get a chance to participate in a decision making.
iv) What can the poor countries do to receive a greater share in the world's wealth?
They should get united to fight for the cause. Only then, they will be able to get their share.
At the same time, they will have to take initiatives to strengthen their internal democracy and
exploit their own available natural resources
19. Give some facts relating to economic progress of democracies and dictatorship
i) On an average, dictatorial regimes have had a slightly better record of economic
growth. But when we compare their record only in poor countries, there is virtually
no difference.
ii) Within democracies there can be very high degree of inequalities. In democratic
countries like South Africa and Brazil, the top 20 per cent people take away more
than 60 per cent of the national income, leaving less than 3 per cent for the bottom 20
per cent population.
iii) Countries like Denmark and Hungary are much better in this respect.
iv) There is often inequality of opportunities available to the poorer sections
21. What would be your verdict on democracy if you had to base it purely on economic
performance of democratic regimes in terms of growth and equal distribution?
On the basis of economic performance, dictatorial regimes have performed slightly better in
last 50 years. The democratic regimes witnessed 3.95 per cent growth rate on an average
while the dictatorial regimes 4.42 per cent. Therefore, dictatorship is better than democracy
based on economic performance
24. “Parallel to the process of bringing individuals into the political arena on an equal
footing, we find growing economic inequalities” Explain
Parallel to the process of bringing individuals into the political arena on an equal footing, we
find growing economic inequalities.
i) A small number of ultra-rich enjoy a highly disproportionate share of wealth and
incomes.
ii) Not only that, their share in the total income of the country has been increasing.
iii) Those at the bottom of the society have very little to depend upon. Their incomes
have been declining.
iv) Sometimes they find it difficult to meet their basic needs of life, such as food,
clothing, house, education and health.
25. “In actual life, democracies do not appear to be very successful in reducing economic
inequalities” Explain
In actual life, democracies do not appear to be very successful in reducing economic
inequalities
i) The poor constitute a large proportion of our voters and no party will like to lose their
votes
ii) Yet democratically elected governments do not appear to be as keen to address the
question of poverty as you would expect them to.
iii) The situation is much worse in some other countries.
iv) In Bangladesh, more than half of its population lives in poverty.
v) People in several poor countries are now dependent on the rich countries even for
food supplies
27. Democracy is a rule of the majority. The poor are in majority. So, democracy must be a
rule of the poor. How can this not be the case?
i) Democracy is a rule of the majority means that rule by majority views.
ii) Rule by majority does not mean rule by majority in terms of religion, race, linguistic
groups, poor or rich.
iii) It means that in case of every decision or in case of every election, different persons
and groups may and can form majority.
iv) So, to say that democracy must be a rule of the poor will give rise to a further division
of society on a different line and lead to conflict.
v) Democracy remains democracy only as long as every citizen has a chance of being in
majority at some point of time
30. What can the poor countries do to receive a greater share in the world’s wealth?
They should get united to fight for the cause. Only then, they will be able to get their share.
At the same time, they will have to take initiatives to strengthen their internal democracy and
exploit their own available natural resources
33. “Ability to handle social differences, divisions and conflicts is thus a definite plus point
of democratic regimes.” Explain
i) No society can fully and permanently resolve conflicts among different groups.
ii) But we can certainly learn to respect these differences and we can also evolve
mechanisms to negotiate the differences.
iii) Democracy is best suited to produce this outcome.
iv) Non-democratic regimes often turn a blind eye to or suppress internal social
differences.
v) Ability to handle social differences, divisions and conflicts is thus a definite plus
point of democratic regimes.
34. All you are saying is that democracy ensures that people do not break each other’s head.
This is not harmony. Should we be happy about it?
i) When a democracy tries to accommodate social diversity, it does not mean it ensures
that people do not break each other’s head.
ii) In fact, democracy teaches us to respect these differences and evolve mechanisms to
negotiate them.
iii) We should be happy that we can live together with dignity and freedom, with all our
differences only when there is a democratic set up
35. What conditions a democracy must fulfil to achieve accommodation of social diversity?
The example of Sri Lanka reminds us that a democracy must fulfil two conditions in order to
achieve this outcome:
i) It is necessary to understand that democracy is not simply rule by majority opinion.
a) The majority always needs to work with the minority so that governments
function to represent the general view
b) Majority and minority opinions are not permanent
ii) It is also necessary that rule by majority does not become rule by majority community
in terms of religion or race or linguistic group, etc.
a) Rule by majority means that in case of every decision or in case of every election,
different persons and groups may and can form a majority.
b) Democracy remains democracy only as long as every citizen has a chance of
being in majority at some point of time.
c) If someone is barred from being in majority on the basis of birth, then the
democratic rule ceases to be accommodative for that person or group.
37. Democracy stands much superior to any other form of government in?
i) Democracy stands much superior to any other form of government in promoting
dignity and freedom of the individual.
ii) Every individual wants to receive respect from fellow beings.
iii) Often conflicts arise among individuals because some feel that they are not treated
with due respect.
iv) The passion for respect and freedom are the basis of democracy.
v) Democracies throughout the world have recognised this, at least in principle
vi) This has been achieved in various degrees in various democracies
42. What functions as the criteria for judging any democratic country?
Expectations from democracy also function as the criteria for judging any democratic country