Descarga
Descarga
Descarga
ISSN 1806-4892
e-ISSN 1983-0807
© FECAP
318
Reviewers:
Abstract Happy Salas Fuentes; Fernando
Salazar-Arrieta.
Purpose – This research project analyzes the use of the theoretical contributions
regarding environmental financial accounting (EFA) by Mexican companies.
Design/methodology/approach – The methodology is divided into two sections.
The first part involves a document analysis of the sustainability reports issued by
29 sustainable companies from the Mexican Stock Exchange. The second section
describes the correlation between the EFA components and revenue.
Findings – The preliminary findings show that the ideas regarding social and
environmental accounting written over two decades ago by Gray (1992), Laringa
(1995), Moneva and Llena (1996), Bebbington (2001), and Llull (2001), among
others, have been applied within the context of the Mexican economy. However,
there are some theoretical gaps that will continue to make EFA a myth for emerging
economies due to the lack of public policies.
Originality/value – This study identifies that the Mexican economy requires
two actions in order to legitimize the stakeholder theory. First, the concepts of
environmental accounting need to be applied across micro, small and medium-sized
businesses. Second, the relationships among stakeholders (suppliers, customers,
shareholders, etc.) need to be analyzed in the environmental reports in order
to assess their level of influence on decision making. The starting point for this
analysis should be the methodology applied in developed economies.
Keywords – Environmental accounting, Sustainability, Competitiveness, Decision
making
318
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
319
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Table 1
Impact of the spread of environmental financial accounting around the world
320
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
can implement EFA (Hossain, 2019). In Ecuador, the lack However, the main objective of this theory is
of terminology has been an obstacle for its development in not to focus on the information, but to ensure that all
agricultural companies (Vilela, 2017). For other countries, stakeholders become involved in issues concerning the
such as Cuba, there are a large number of theoretical environment; the aim is to strengthen business decisions
proposals that could be the basis for the implementation regarding environmental impact (Carrasco, Correa, &
of EFA in companies where it is unknown, such as in rum Larrinaga, 1999). With this in mind, “accounting and
businesses (Albuerne & Venereo, 2017). In the case of the the accounting profession have to participate in fulfilling
cement industry in Algeria, the obstacles for companies to the needs of all stakeholders, as they offer information
implement EFA are external, such as the lack of legal texts to collaborate in environmental management through
to force companies to provide and issue financial reports different functions” (Llena, 2008, p. 126). In Mexico,
related to their environmental performance (Nadjoua & environmental financial information has been disclosed
Bouselma, 2016). through sustainability reports; thus, accounting has
Other findings regarding the application of become the instrument that companies have at hand to
EFA are evidence of how useful it is for the business provide information for stakeholders (Gray, Owen, &
sector. For instance, companies listed on the Buenos Adams, 1996).
Aires Stock Exchange in Argentina tend to disclose This theory became relevant for Mexican companies
environmental information, thus proving their social in 2011, when the Mexican Stock Exchange created the
responsibility (Larramendy, Tellechea, & Tobes, 2018). sustainable IPC (the acronym stands for “index of prices
In India, some companies keep accounting records of and quotations” in Spanish). Its application is essential,
carbon emissions, which allows them to increase their as “environmental reporting is becoming increasingly
value (Kumar & Firoz, 2019b). In the case of chemicals important in the value creation processes of firms” (Kumar
and oil companies in Brazil and Spain, transparency and & Firoz, 2019b, p. 1). The sustainable IPC aims to create
an index of Mexican firms that show a commitment to the
legitimacy of their activities are the main reasons why
environment. These businesses are known as sustainable
they elaborate sustainability reports to keep stakeholders
companies. The concept is proof of the impact that
informed (Cunha & Moneva, 2018).
theoretical proposals regarding sustainable development
2.2 Stakeholder theor y from the have on business practices.
perspective of Mexican companies The sustainable IPC started with 23 companies.
By 2019, the number had increased to 29, according to
Stakeholder theory, according to Freeman (1984), the BMV report of January 2020. These are from sectors
considers the interested parties within a company as members such as telecommunication services, industrials, materials,
connected by a common cause. This theory is included in consumer discretionary and services, consumer staples,
the ethical framework of the company (Carroll, 1989), so healthcare, energy, and financial services. The companies
that all parties participate in the decision-making process have to issue a yearly report to inform stakeholders and
(Martínez, Carbonell, & Agüero, 2006). For Freeman owners about the environmental impact resulting from
(1984), an organization is a group of parties known as their business practices. This is proof of the implementation
stakeholders. These are shareholders, employees, investors, of stakeholder theory. The reports disclose information
suppliers, customers, and society in general (Uribe & generated by environmental financial accounting which, as
Requena, 2013), who all work together to create a successful Llull (2001, p. 117) highlights, includes “estimates, records,
business (Freeman, 2010). In this sense, communication and information regarding environmental assets, liabilities,
and interaction among stakeholders make an important expenditure, income, contingencies, and provisions.”
contribution in the process of achieving company goals After years of research on environmental accounting, it is
(Schvarstein, 2010). Thus, the information disclosed by time to investigate whether it helps Mexican companies
a company is fundamental to devising the best corporate to achieve sustainability. In this regard, several authors
strategy (Hyo-Sook, 2011) to address concerns such as (Gray, 1992; Larrinaga, 1995; Parodi, 2010, etc.) affirm
caring for and preserving natural resources (Barrios & that companies do increase their competitiveness in the
Enrique, 2018; Castañeda, 2017; Contreras, Talero, & long term by including environmental aspects in their
Escobar, 2020). accounting reports.
321
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Table 2
Data collection method and instrument used for analyzing the use of environmental financial
accounting in sustainable companies listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange.
Instrument for data
Variables in the study Method Tools for data analysis Sources of information
collection
V1.Sustainable companies Document analysis Data recording Microsoft Excel BMV’s digital platform:
(Appendix A) 2018 sustainability
reports
V2.Environmental Microsoft Excel BMV’s digital platform:
accounting 2018 sustainability
reports
V3.Revenue vs Statistical Package for the BMV’s digital platform:
Environmental Social Sciences (SPSS) 2019 and 2018 financial
accounting reports.
V1 = Variable 1, V2 = Variable 2, V3 = Variable 3
Source: Elaborated by the author.
322
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
V 2.2: Environmental provisions and liabilities; as food, drinks, and tobacco. Infraestructura Energetica
V 2.3: Environmental expenditure and investment; Nova and Genomma Lab Internacional represent a 3%
V 2.4: Environmental and/or social balance. minority that specializes in the energy and healthcare
V3. Revenue vs environmental accounting: The sector, respectively. According to Chart 1, over a fifth
fluctuations in revenue during the third quarters (21%) of the companies belong to the industrial sector,
of 2018 and 2019 were correlated to the aspects including Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, ALFA, Grupo
of environmental accounting (environmental Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, Corporación Inmobiliaria
activities reports, social and/or environmental VESTA, Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviacion, and
balance, as well as environmental provisions, Orbia Advance Corporation (See Table 3).
liabilities, expenditure, and investment). The Chart 2 shows that all sustainable companies
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange in 2018 issued
was used on the BMV’s financial reports to reports disclosing the activities carried out to benefit
correlate the variables. The confidence level was the environment. This is proof of the use of stakeholder
95% with a 5% margin of error. The Pearson’s theory. In terms of the elements described by Llull
correlation coefficient was used for the analysis. (2001), 93% of the companies include in their reports
quantitative and qualitative information with regards
4 Findings: presentation and to expenditure and investments to care for and preserve
analysis natural resources. A smaller number (69%) provide
The actions taken by sustainable companies are users with a social or environmental report. Finally,
evidence of the implementation of stakeholder theory only 28% of the companies show a commitment to the
in the Mexican economy. These companies are listed in environment by using provisions or contingent liability
Table 3 by sector and include America Movil, Cemex, accounts. These accounts keep records of the potential
Grupo Financieros Banorte, and Grupo Elektra. By 2019, cash expenditure resulting from the environmental
a total of 29 companies were taking actions to maintain damage caused by company practices.
a balance between economic, environmental, and social Authors such as Gray (1992), Larrinaga (1995),
aspects. and Parodi (2010) have stated that companies that
Chart 1 shows the companies, classified by sector, include information on environmental impact in their
that apply stakeholder theory in their environmental reports. reports increase their competitiveness in the long term.
Most of them (28%) specialize in consumer staples such Furthermore, recent studies, such as those carried out in
Chart 1. Business sectors of the sustainable companies listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange in
2019
323
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Table 3
Sustainable companies listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange in 2019
Business sector Items Name of the Company Absolute frequency Relative frequency
Telecommunication TS América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. 3 10%
services Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. C.V.
AXTEL, S.A.B. de C.V.
Industrial I Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S.A.B. de 6 21%
C.V.
ALFA, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte,
S.A.B. DE C.V.
Corporación Inmobiliaria VESTA, S.A.B.
DE C.V.
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación,
S.A.B. De C.V.
Orbia Advance Corporation, S.A.B. DE
C.V.
Materials M CEMEX, S.A.B. DE C.V. 3 10%
Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V.
Industrias Peñoles, S. A.B. DE C. V.
Consumer CD&S Grupo Elektra, S.A.B. de C.V. 3 10%
Discretionary & ALSEA, S.A.B. de C.V.
Services
Hoteles City Express, S.A.B. De C.V
Consumer Staples CS Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de 8 28%
C.V. (FEMSA)
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (COF)
Wal - Mart de México, S.A.B. de C.V.
Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Herdez, S.A.B. De C.V.
Kimberly - Clark De México S.A.B. De C.V.
Grupo LALA, S.A.B. de C.V.
Financial Services FS Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B de C.V. 4 14%
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V.
GENTERA, S.A.B. de C.V.
Banco Santander México, S.A., Institución
De Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero
Santander
Energy E Infraestructura Energética Nova, S.A.B. De 1 3%
C.V.
Healthcare HC Genomma Lab Internacional, S.A.B. De 1 3%
C.V.
Total 29 100%
Greek industry, support this statement by pointing out & Tzelepis, 2018). Part of this investigation focuses on
the positive correlation that exists between financial and measuring the impact that the use of EFA has on the
environmental performance (Alexopoulos, Kounetas, revenue of sustainable companies established in Mexico.
324
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
325
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Table 4
Comparative analysis of revenue in the third quarters of 2018 and 2019 of the BMV’s sustainable
IPC companies
Aspects of Environmental
Revenue 2019 Third Revenue 2018 Third
Business sector Financial Accounting/ Variation (+) Variation (-)
Quarter Quarter
Companies
TS América Móvil 248,425,505.00 mxn 247,935,745.00 mxn 1
Grupo Televisa 25,786,149.00 mxn 25,033,234 mxn 1
AXTEL 3,167,232.00 mxn 3,139,869.00 mxn 1
I Grupo Aeroportuario del 4,106,266.00 mxn 3,682,047.00 mxn 1
Sureste
ALFA 83,842,066.00 mxn 93,940,201.00 mxn 0
Grupo Aeroportuario del 2,155,384.00 mxn 1,966,564 mxn 1
Centro Norte
Corporación Inmobiliaria 35,826.00 usd 33,822.00 usd 1
VESTA
Controladora Vuela 9,501,756.00 mxn 7,316,075.00 mxn 1
Compañía de Aviación
Orbia Advance Corporation 1,746,875.00 usd 1,785,291.00 usd 0
M CEMEX 3,494,091.00 usd 3,636,210.00 usd 0
Grupo México 2,793,883.00 usd 2,594,524.00 usd 1
Industrias Peñoles 1,103,664.00 usd 1,048,186.00 usd 1
CD&S Grupo Elektra 29,733,117.00 mxn 25,490,119 mxn 1
ALSEA 14,490,497.00 mxn 11,375,395.00 mxn 1
Hoteles City Express 811,775.00 mxn 741,116.00 mxn 1
CS Fomento Económico 130,470,010.00 mxn 118,371,443.00 mxn 1
Mexicano (FEMSA)
Coca-Cola FEMSA (COF) 48,698,552.00 mxn 44,148,103.00 mxn 1
Wal – Mart de México 155,018,693.00 mxn 147,767,841.00 mxn 1
Arca Continental 42,415,195.00 mxn 40,556,716.00 mxn 1
Grupo Bimbo 74,965,171.00 mxn 72,646,378.00 mxn 1
Grupo Herdez 5,569,282.00 mxn 5,203,789.00 mxn 1
Kimberly – Clark De 10,399,724.00 mxn 9,896,553.00 mxn 1
México
Grupo LALA 18,984,001.00 mxn 18,757,695.00 mxn 1
FS Grupo Financiero Banorte, 84, 563, 000,000.00 73,444,000,000.00 1
mxn IA mxn IA
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores 933,764.00 mxn 871,846.00 mxn 1
GENTERA 16, 802, 536, 063.00 mxn 15, 412, 072, 117.00 1
mxn
Banco Santander México, 30, 465, 000, 000.00 $28 828 000, 000.00 1
S.A., Institución De Banca mxn IA mxn IA
Múltiple, Grupo Financiero
Santander
E Infraestructura Energética 355,098.00 usd 408,032.00 usd 0
Nova
HC Genomma Lab Internacional 3,077,304.00 mxn 2,734,825.00 mxn 1
Total= 29 companies 25 4
Note IA = Estimated revenue, mxn = Mexican currency, USD = dollars, 1 = positive fluctuation, 0 = negative fluctuation
the environment. In the case of Mexican companies, companies to maintain their position in the market in the
28% have environmental provisions and liabilities. When long term by avoiding fees, sanctions, or business closures.
these accounts are correlated with revenue, the resulting This supports the argument by Parodi (2010), who states
relationship is -0.424; this means that these accounts that disregarding environmental externalities results in
cause a decrease in revenue. However, they also help incomplete accounting information. As a consequence,
326
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
Table 5
Quantitative summary of the application of stakeholder theory, the aspects of environmental
accounting, and the fluctuation in revenue between the third quarters of 2018 and 2019 for the
BMV’s sustainable IPC companies
327
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
responsible practices show a level of growth that the rest Regardless of the size of the business, environmental
of the companies cannot achieve. These companies can financial accounting has to be applied at all levels. In Mexico,
access different financing options such as the new class it is essential to introduce the contributions of EFA in
of tags for assets” (Rivera, 2019). micro, small, and medium-sized businesses. Even though
Environmental financial accounting (EFA) is these represent 95% of the businesses operating in the
evidence of the use of stakeholder theory as it allows national economy, there is a lack of theoretical proposals
managers to take specific actions to care for and preserve in this sector. Within the framework of sustainable
natural resources. In the case of companies not listed development, environmental accounting reports should
on the Mexican Stock Exchange, the lack of public be mandatory, not voluntary. If the goal is to transition
policies or regulations to enforce the implementation to a “green economy,” accounting reports are essential in
of EFA in accounting reports represents an obstacle decision making.
for the application of stakeholder theory. This results
in competitive disadvantages in terms of sustainability, 5 Conclusion
which supports the argument by Kumar and Kiroz
(2019a), who state that policies based on voluntary EFA started 25 years ago as a series of theoretical
environmental reporting have a positive relationship proposals by advocates of social and environmental
with the size of a business. accounting (Bebbington, 2001; Gray, 1992; Larrinaga,
Some companies include environmental 1995; Moneva & Llena, 1996; among others), and
information in their financial reports through the accounts now, in 21st-century Mexico, its application is a reality.
used for conventional accounting such as expenditure, EFA started in developed economies and has been moving
investment, liabilities, provisions, etc. This makes it into emerging economies during the past 10 years, according
difficult for stakeholders to identify and interpret the to Larrinaga, Moneva, and Ortas (2019, p. 12): “there
data. According to Deegan (2013), as quoted in the are voices that are eager to bring different perspectives to
paper by Bernal and Santos (2018, p. 2016): “the way the foreground, particularly from emerging economies.”
the elements in financial reports such as assets, liabilities, The inspiration for this study emerges from the idea
equity, income, expenditure, etc. are defined makes it hard that studies conducted in first-world countries could
to adapt them to environmental financial accounting.” provide numerous perspectives regarding the application
This highlights the fact that companies who intend to of environmental accounting (Déniz, Verona, & De la
follow the sustainability framework need to propose and Rosa, 2019).
apply a chart of environmental accounts. In the Mexican economy, stakeholder theory
It is essential to implement environmental became more relevant as the BMV’s sustainable companies
accounting among economic entities in order to started to apply it. It is based on a normative-ethical
achieve sustainable development and financial benefits point of view. However, there are two main actions to
in the long term (Ionescu, 2017). The lack of a chart consider in order to achieve its legitimization. One is to
of environmental accounts results from the non- introduce the contributions of environmental accounting
standardization of environmental financial reports. in micro, small, and medium-sized businesses. These
Companies should get involved and “design plans of companies are not listed in the stock market but account
environmental accounts to make environmental financial for a significant number of businesses in the Mexican
information more accessible” (Garrido, 2019, p. 100). economy. The second is to analyze the relationship
Accountants have to be creative in the elaboration and among stakeholders (suppliers, customers, shareholders,
design of such accounts (Deegan, 2013) and employ etc.) in the environmental reports of Mexican businesses
the scientific methods and research techniques as a in order to assess their level of influence in decision
starting point (Albuerne & Venereo, 2017). The chart making, “as the more integrated the stakeholders of
of environmental accounts for companies listed on the a company are, the better the managers can interpret
Mexican Stock Exchange consolidates the application the environment in order to enhance competitiveness”
of stakeholder theory as it standardizes environmental (Claver, López, & Molina, 2007, p. 724). For this, it is
accounting reports and allows stakeholders to better essential to carry out studies based on the methodology
understand the data. applied in developed economies as this allows different
328
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
329
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores. (2020). Reporte de sustentabilidad. Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera 2019,
México. https://www.bmv.com.mx/es/Grupo_BMV/ Mexico: Autor.
Reporte_de_sustentabilidad
Contreras, O. E., Talero, L. H., & Escobar, L.Y. (2020).
Campos, N. (2009). La inversión ambiental en las Sostenibilidad, stakeholders y crisis de empresa: un análisis
empresas. El cuaderno, 3(6), 235-249. Retrieved from estructurado de percepciones. Suma de negocios, 11(24),
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/revista/12079/A/2009 1-9. Retrieved from https://blogs.konradlorenz.edu.co/
files/27-08-2019-rsn_1124_contreras-pacheco-w.pdf
Cañizares, M. (2015). Procedimiento para cuantificar
los costos de las actividades ambientales en la gestión Correa, J. A., Garcia, M. A., & Garcia, E. (2018). CSR
de sostenibilidad del recurso agua potable (Doctoral communication strategies of Colombian business groups:
dissertation, University of La Habana, La Habana, Cuba) An analysis of corporate reports. Sustainability, 10(5),
1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051602
Carrasco, F., Correa, C., & Larrinaga, C. (1999).
Información y gestión medioambiental: Una reflexión Cunha, D. R., & Moneva, J. L. (2018). The elaboration
sobre los factores de motivación, proceso de desarrollo de process of the sustainability report: A case study. Revista
informes e influencia de los Stakeholders en las empresas Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 20(4), 533-549. DOI:
del sector eléctrico. Reunión sobre Investigación en 10.7819/rbgn.v0i0.3948
Contabilidad Social y Medioambiental.
Déniz, J. J., & Verona, M. C. (2015). Deconstruyendo el
Carroll, A. B. (1989). Business and society: Ethics and resultado contable convencional para diseñar un resultado
stakeholder management. Cincinnati, United States: South- contable ambiental. Contaduría y Administración, 60(3),
Western Thomson Learning. 536- 555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2015.05.008
Castañeda, V. M. (2017). La contabilidad como una Déniz, J. J., Verona, M. C., & De la Rosa, M. E. (2019).
disciplina social y medio ambiental, (Thesis for specialist Materialidad de los impactos sociales en la memoria de
degree in Tax Auditing and Management) School of sostenibilidad. El caso del sector eólico y los pueblos
Economic and Managerial Sciences, University of Bogota, indígenas en Oaxaca, Mexico. Revista Española de
Colombia. Financiación y Contabilidad, 48(4), 492-524. DOI:
10.1080 / 02102412.2018.1511157
Claver, E., López, M. D., & Molina, J.F. (2007). Los
Stakeholders y la actitud medioambiental de los directivos. Deegan, C. (2016). Twenty-five years of social and
Un estudio Qual/Quan., [Conference presentation] environmental accounting research within Critical
Congreso anual de AEDEM, Madrid, Spain. Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43(1), 65–87. https://
Colina, J., & Senior, A. (2008). Balance social. Instrumento doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
de análisis para la gestión empresarial responsable.
Multiciencias, 8(Extraordinario), 71-77. Retrieved from Fogarassy, C., Neubauer, É., Mansur, H., Tangl, A.,
https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/904/90411691010.pdf Oláh, J., & Popp, J. The main transition management
issues and the effects of environmental accounting on
Colmenares, L., Valderrama, Y., & Adriani, R. (2015). financial performance: With focus on cement industry.
Representación contable desde la perspectiva del impacto Administration and Public Management Review, 30(31),
ambiental empresarial. En el contexto del desarrollo de 52-53. DOI: 1024818/amp/2018.31-04.
actividades industriales en Latinoamérica. Cuadernos
De Contabilidad, 16(41). Retrieved from https://doi. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder
org/10.11144/Javeriana.cc16-41.rcpi approach. Boston, United States: Pitman Publishing.
Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.
Instituto Mexicano de Contadores Públicos. (2019). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
330
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
Gámez, L. C., Joya, R., & García, H. G. (2017). Análisis and Management, 7(1), 45-57. DOI: 10.5890/
de la presupuestación financiera medioambiental mexicana. JEAM.2019.03.004
Retos de la Dirección, 11(1), 4-20. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/
rdir/v11n1/rdir02117.pdf La Soa, N. (2019). Relationship between environmental
financial accounting practices and corporate financial
Garrido, S. (2019). Componentes para analizar los risk: Evidence from listed companies in Vietnams
resultados de una Contabilidad Ambiental. Proyecciones, Securities Market, Asian Economic and Financial
(13), 73- 101. https://doi.org/10.24215/26185474e006 Review, 9(2), 285-298. DOI: 10.18488/journal.
aefr.2019.92.285.298
Gray, R. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism:
An exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for Larramendy, E., Tellechea, P., & Tobes, L. (2018).
accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Investigación empírica sobre relaciones entre la
Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399–425. https://doi. información financiera y socioambiental brindada
org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90038-T por empresas en Argentina. Escritos Contables y de
Administración, 9(1), 83-102. https://dialnet.unirioja.
Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6682382
Accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social
Larrinaga, C. (1995). La relación entre las prácticas contables
and environmental reporting. London: Prentice hall.
y el medio ambiente (Doctoral Dissertation, Department of
Hossain, M. (2019). Environmental accounting challenges Financial Economy and Accounting, University of Seville,
of selected manufacturing enterprises in Bangladesh. Spain). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/
Open Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 709-727. pdf/61545821.pdf
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.72048
Larrinaga, C. (1997). Consideraciones en torno a la relación
entre la Contabilidad y el medio ambiente. Revista Española
Hutchinson, C. (1992). Environmental issues:
de Financiación y Contabilidad, 26(93), 957-991. http://
The challenge for the chief executive. Long Range
aeca.es/old/refc_1972-2013/1997/93-4.pdf
Planning, 25(3), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-
6301(92)90369-D Larrinaga, C., Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2019).
Veinticinco años de Contabilidad Social y Medioambiental
Hyo-Sook, K. (2011). A reputational approach examining
en España: Pasado, presente y futuro. Revista Española de
publics’ attributions on corporate social responsibility
Finanzas y Contabilidad, 48(4), 387-405. https://doi.or
motives. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(1), 84-101.
g/10.1080/02102412.2019.1632020
https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2010.524230
Llena, F. (2008). El papel de la contabilidad en la
Ionescu, C. A. (2017). Integrating the environmental gestión medioambiental de la empresa: Propuestas y
accounting on the information system of the economic evidencia empírica. Revista de Contabilidad y Dirección,
entities. Hyperion Economic Journal, 5(2), 42-48. https:// 7(7), 103-134. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/
ideas.repec.org/a/hyp/journl/v5y2017i2p42-48.html articulo?codigo=3127470
Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2019a). Accounting for Certified Llull, A. (2001). Contabilidad medioambiental y
Emission Reductions (CERs) in India: An analysis of the desarrollo sostenible en el sector turístico (Doctoral
disclosure and reporting practices within the financial dissertation, School of Economy, University of the
statements. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(2), 365- Balearic Islands, Spain). Retrieved from http://hdl.
389. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-01-2019-0428 handle.net/11201/2636
Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2019b). What drives the Voluntary Macías, H. A., & Velásquez, S. (2017). Avances de la
Environmental Reporting (VER): An examination of contabilidad social y ambiental en su contexto original.
CDP India Firms, Journal of Environmental Accounting Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia, 1(70), 13-41.
331
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Muralikrishna, I., & Manickam, V. (2017). Environmental Sheshukova, T., & Mukhina, E. (2018). Environmental
Management: Science and Engineering for Industry. In accounting in digital economy. En Antipoya, T., &
Environmental Management. Amsterdam: Butterworth-
Rocha, A. (Ed.). Digital Science (pp. 64-70). Coimbra,
Heinemann. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811989-1.00007-5
Portugal: Springer.
Mussa, I., Feku, A., & Mussa, M. (2018). Environmental
Smith, A. M., & Kotzee, E. (2017). Investigating
accounting and auditing and eco mark. Current Investigations
environmental management accounting in the chemical
in Agriculture and Current Research, 5(3), 612- 614. DOI:
industry in South Africa. Investment Management and
10.32474/CIACR.2018.05.000212
Financial Innovations, 13(1), 151-160. Doi:10.21511/
Nadjoua, A., & Bouselma, H. (2016). Obstacles to the imfi.13(1-1).2016.02
implementation of environmental financial accounting
in the Algerian cement enterprises: A field study. Dirassat, Stefan, R. B. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting.
1(48), 12-23. DOI: 10.34118 / 0136-000-048-024 Issues, concepts and practice. London: Routledge. https://
doi.org/10.4324/9781351282529
Nijkamp, P., Rodenburg, C., & Verhoef, E. (1999).
The adoption and diffusion of environmental friendly Tamayo, C. D., & Ruíz, M. C. (2018). De la responsabilidad
technologies among firms. International Journal of social empresarial al balance social. Cofin Habana, 1(1),
Technology Management, 17(4), 421-437. DOI: 10.1504 304-320. Retrieved from http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/cofin/
/ IJTM.1999.002725 v12n1/cofin20118.pdf
332
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
Tua, J. (1995). Lecturas de Teoría e investigación contable. Uribe, A., & Requena, R. (2013). Consideraciones del
Colombia: Ediciones Gráficas Ltda. enfoque stakeholder. Punto de vista, 4(7), 31-50. Retrieved
from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/372154
Tua, J. (2001). Normas internacionales de Contabilidad
y Auditoría sobre la incidencia del medio ambiente en Vilela, P. D. (2017). La contabilidad financiera ambiental
la información financiera. Revista Legis del Contador. en las empresas agrícolas ecuatorianas. Revista Científica
Colombia, 1(7), 117-166. Retrieved from https://biblat. Retos de la Ciencia, 1(1), 72-87. http://retosdelaciencia.
unam.mx/es/revista/revista-legis-del-contador/2 com/Revistas/index.php/retos/article/view/144
333
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Appendix A
Tool used to identify the use of EFA in the sustainability and financial reports of the companies studied. Number
“1” means that EFA is being applied, whereas “0” means there is no evidence of its application. The elements that were
analyzed are those listed by Llull (2001, p.1) in the definition of the concepts that make up EFA: “records and information
on environmental assets, liabilities, expenditure, income, contingencies, and provisions.”
Aspects of
Environmental Environmental
environmental Environmental Environmental/
provisions and expenditure and
Business sector financial activity report v2.1 social report v2.4
liabilities report v2.2 investment report
accounting/ (EAR) (ESR)
(EPLR) v2.3 (EEIR)
companies
TS América Móvil 1 1 1 0
Grupo Televisa 1 1 1 1
AXTEL 1 0 1 1
I Grupo Aeroportuario 1 1 1 1
del Sureste
ALFA 1 1 1 1
Grupo Aeroportuario 1 0 1 1
del Centro Norte
Corporación 1 0 1 0
Inmobiliaria VESTA
Controladora Vuela 1 0 1 0
Compañía de
Aviación
Orbia Advance 1 0 1 1
Corporation
M CEMEX 1 1 1 1
Grupo México 1 0 1 0
Industrias Peñoles 1 1 1 1
CD&S Grupo Elektra 1 1 1 0
ALSEA 1 0 0 0
Hoteles City Express 1 0 1 1
CS Fomento Económico 1 0 1 1
Mexicano (FEMSA)
Coca-Cola FEMSA 1 0 1 0
(COF)
Wal - Mart de 1 0 1 0
México
Arca Continental 1 0 1 0
Grupo Bimbo 1 0 1 1
Grupo Herdez 1 0 1
Kimberly - Clark De 1 0 1 1
México
Grupo LALA 1 0 1 1
TS = Telecommunication services, I = Industrial, M = Materials, CD&S = Consumer discretionary & services CS, = Consumer staples
F = Financial services, E = Energy, HC = Healthcare, EAC = Environmental activity report, EPLR = Environmental provisions and
liabilities report, EEIR = Environmental expenditure and liabilities report, ESB = Environmental/social report, 1 = Identified, 2 = Not
identified
Source: Elaborated by the authors.
334
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
An in-depth look at the status of environmental financial accounting in Mexico from the point of view of stakeholder theory: myth or reality?
Continued...
Aspects of
Environmental Environmental
environmental Environmental Environmental/
provisions and expenditure and
Business sector financial activity report v2.1 social report v2.4
liabilities report v2.2 investment report
accounting/ (EAR) (ESR)
(EPLR) v2.3 (EEIR)
companies
FS Grupo Financiero 1 0 1 1
Banorte
Bolsa Mexicana de 1 0 1 1
Valores
GENTERA 1 0 0 1
Banco Santander 1 0 1 1
México, S.A.,
Institución De Banca
Múltiple, Grupo
Financiero Santander
E Infraestructura 1 1 1 1
Energética Nova
HC Genomma Lab 1 0 1 1
Internacional
Totales Si= 29 No=0 Si=8 No=21 Si=27 No=2 Si=20 No=9
TS = Telecommunication services, I = Industrial, M = Materials, CD&S = Consumer discretionary & services CS, = Consumer staples
F = Financial services, E = Energy, HC = Healthcare, EAC = Environmental activity report, EPLR = Environmental provisions and
liabilities report, EEIR = Environmental expenditure and liabilities report, ESB = Environmental/social report, 1 = Identified, 2 = Not
identified
Source: Elaborated by the authors.
335
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez / Arístides Pelegrin Mesa
Copyrights:
RBGN owns the copyrights of this published content.
Plagiarism analysis
RBGN performs plagiarism analysis on all its articles at the time of submission and after approval of the manuscript using
the iThenticate tool.
Authors:
1. Saulo Sinforoso Martínez, PhD in Administrative Sciences and Management for Development by the University of
Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico.
E-mail: ssinforoso@uv.mx
2. Arístides Pelegrin Mesa, PhD in Accounting Sciences by the University of Camagüey Ignacio Agramonte y Loynaz,
Camaguey, Cuba.
E-mail: pelegrin65@yahoo.es
Authors’ Contributions
Saulo Sinforoso Martínez: Definition of research problem; Development of hypotheses or research questions (empirical
studies); Development of theoretical propositions (theoretical work); Theoretical foundation/literature review; Analysis and
interpretation of data; Data collection; Statistical analysis; Analysis and interpretation of data; Manuscript writing.
Arístides Pelegrin Mesa: Development of theoretical propositions (theoretical work); Theoretical foundation/literature
review; Critical revision of the manuscript; Statistical analysis; Analysis and interpretation of data; Manuscript writing.
336
R. Bras. Gest. Neg., São Paulo, v.23, n.2, p.318-336, apr./jun. 2021