Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Bystander Effect

    Uploaded by

    Jeri Alonzo
    1. Three studies conducted since 2010 examined reaction times based on various factors. 2. Jain et al. (2015) measured auditory and visual reaction times in medical students, finding females had slower times. Physical activity was also considered. 3. Chouamo et al. (2021) looked at differences in reaction times between dominant and non-dominant hands in males and females, using a device that tracked responses to vibrations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bystander Effect

    Uploaded by

    Jeri Alonzo
    18 views1 page
    1. Three studies conducted since 2010 examined reaction times based on various factors. 2. Jain et al. (2015) measured auditory and visual reaction times in medical students, finding females had slower times. Physical activity was also considered. 3. Chouamo et al. (2021) looked at differences in reaction times between dominant and non-dominant hands in males and females, using a device that tracked responses to vibrations.

    Original Title

    bystander effect

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. Three studies conducted since 2010 examined reaction times based on various factors. 2. Jain et al. (2015) measured auditory and visual reaction times in medical students, finding females had slower times. Physical activity was also considered. 3. Chouamo et al. (2021) looked at differences in reaction times between dominant and non-dominant hands in males and females, using a device that tracked responses to vibrations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    18 views1 page

    Bystander Effect

    Uploaded by

    Jeri Alonzo
    1. Three studies conducted since 2010 examined reaction times based on various factors. 2. Jain et al. (2015) measured auditory and visual reaction times in medical students, finding females had slower times. Physical activity was also considered. 3. Chouamo et al. (2021) looked at differences in reaction times between dominant and non-dominant hands in males and females, using a device that tracked responses to vibrations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Authority

    Bystander e ect

    A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical
    activity levels of medical rst year students

    1. What has been done in terms of experiments on your initial topic since the year 2010?

    2. How were these experiments conducted (measures used, process of experimentation,


    other related information)?

    Similarly, a study conducted by Jain et al. (2015) test on the audio and visual reaction times of
    rst year medical students to compare the results of both genders, male and female. They also
    included the physical activity level as another variable. They utilized the beep tone in
    measuring for Auditory Reaction Time (ART) and red circle in measuring for Visual Reaction
    Time (VRT). The task was to press the spacebar as soon as the stimulus was presented. There
    were ve rounds for each student, with their fastest score for each Reaction Time were
    recorded. These records are then used for statistical analysis.

    1. What has been done in terms of experiments on your initial topic since the year 2010?

    2. How were these experiments conducted (measures used, process of experimentation,


    other related information)?

    Reaction time and hand dominance

    1. What has been done in terms of experiments on your initial topic since the year 2010?

    2. How were these experiments conducted (measures used, process of experimentation,


    other related information)?

    On the other hand, Chouamo et al. (2021) were curious on the di erence of reaction time of a
    dominant and non-dominant hand between two genders. They used the Brain Gauge hardware
    as an apparatus of measurement, it is speci cally made for tracking concussions and brain
    traumas on individuals. Each participant was tasked to press a button when they feel a
    stimulus (sinusoidal vibrotactile stimulation) sent thought the apparatus. The subjects are to
    respond with digit 2 button when a stimulus is sent through the digit 3 button. These subjects
    were asked to take turns when using their dominant and non-dominant hand to factor in the
    fatigue that they may feel.
    fi
    fi
    ff
    fi
    fi
    ff

    You might also like