This document outlines the key components of critical thinking and reading. It discusses critical thinking and reflective thinking, and how they are often used interchangeably. Critical thinking involves purposeful, reasoned thinking to achieve goals, while reflective thinking focuses on analyzing past events. The document also outlines the requirements of active critical thinkers, including questioning sources and forming supported opinions. Finally, it details the components of close, critical reading: reading to understand, respond, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources.
This document outlines the key components of critical thinking and reading. It discusses critical thinking and reflective thinking, and how they are often used interchangeably. Critical thinking involves purposeful, reasoned thinking to achieve goals, while reflective thinking focuses on analyzing past events. The document also outlines the requirements of active critical thinkers, including questioning sources and forming supported opinions. Finally, it details the components of close, critical reading: reading to understand, respond, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources.
This document outlines the key components of critical thinking and reading. It discusses critical thinking and reflective thinking, and how they are often used interchangeably. Critical thinking involves purposeful, reasoned thinking to achieve goals, while reflective thinking focuses on analyzing past events. The document also outlines the requirements of active critical thinkers, including questioning sources and forming supported opinions. Finally, it details the components of close, critical reading: reading to understand, respond, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources.
This document outlines the key components of critical thinking and reading. It discusses critical thinking and reflective thinking, and how they are often used interchangeably. Critical thinking involves purposeful, reasoned thinking to achieve goals, while reflective thinking focuses on analyzing past events. The document also outlines the requirements of active critical thinkers, including questioning sources and forming supported opinions. Finally, it details the components of close, critical reading: reading to understand, respond, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources.
Semester 1 Outline ➢ Critical thinking and reading Critical Thinking/Reflection and Reading ➢ Critical thinking and reflective thinking are often used synonymously a) Critical Thinking • Critical means “active” and “Positive” • It is the thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed • Critical Thinking involves a wide range of thinking skills leading toward desirable outcomes b) Reflective thinking • reflective thinking focuses on the process of making judgments about what has happened. • This is a part of the critical thinking process referring specifically to the processes of analyzing and making judgments about what has happened. • Reflective thinking is an active, persistent, and careful consideration of a belief or supposed form of knowledge, of the grounds that support that knowledge, and the further conclusions to which that knowledge leads. Requirements in Critical thinking a. Active, critical thinkers search for and question similarities and differences • More sources always present similarities and differences b. Active critical thinkers challenge and are challenged by sources Challenge the author: Ask questions of the sources • Identify central Problem to explore and reasons • Identify most important statement made • Identify the author etc. Challenge yourself: Ask questions of yourself • Critical reading points in two directions: text you are reading and you, especially origin of your views c. Active Critical thinkers set issues in a broader context • Identify issues that are important to a single reading selection. The larger context is not obvious. • Techniques to discovering larger context i. Begin by identifying one or more issues that you think are important to a text ii. Assume that each issue is an instance or example, of something larger. Your job is to speculate. iii. Write the name of the issue at the top of a page followed by a question: What is this part of ? iv. Use this broader context to stimulate more thought on the reading selection and to generate questions. v. Option: Investigate other reading selections d. Active critical thinkers will form and support opinions • Opinions follow from responses to questions such as: i. Has the author explained things clearly? ii. In what ways does this topic confuse me? iii. Has the author convinced me of his or her main argument? iv. What is my view on this topic? v. Would I recommend this source to others? Components of a close, critical reading • Reading is intended to understand, respond, evaluate and synthesize. Reading to understand • Identify the author’s purpose such as to inform or argue. • Identify the author’s intended audience, text to be written with particular readers in mind • Locate the authors intended audience- think of readers • Understand the structure of the text – locate main points • Identify as quickly as possible what you do not understand • Reading to understand entails reading in three stages: i. Preview: skim text –reading quickly ii. Read: read with pen in hand, making notes iii. Review: skim text second time to consolidate notes. Reading to Respond • This is the second component of critical reading • The overall goal of reading to respond is to identify and explore your reactions to a text. The goals are as follows: 1. Reflect on your experience and association with topic of text. Know what you feel about a text. 2. Let the text challenge you 3. Use the text to spark new, imaginative thinking. • Applying techniques for reading to respond - Use questions when you approach the text. The questions are: - Which one or two sentences did I respond to most strongly in the text? - What is the origin of my views on this topic? - What new interests, questions or observations does this text spark in me? Reading to Evaluate • This is the third component and focus is on personal associations with the text. • Setting goals for reading to evaluate. There are four goals: 1. Distinguish between an author’s use of facts and use of opinions 2. Distinguish between an author’s assumptions and your own. 3. Judge the effectiveness of an explanation 4. Judge the effectiveness of an argument ➢ Applying techniques for reading to evaluate • Distinguish your assumptions from those of an author • Distinguish facts from opinions • Distinguish your definitions of terms from those of an author • Question sources that explain and sources that argue Reading to synthesize • Once you have understood, responded to and evaluated a single source, you are in a position to link that source with others. • Synthesis requires that you read and understand all your source materials and that you respond to and evaluate each one. • Goals for reading to synthesize 1. Read to understand, respond to, and evaluate multiple sources on a subject, problem or issue 2. Understand your own views on the subject, problem or issue- be able to state these views in a sentence or two. 3. Forge relationships among source materials, according to your purpose. In a synthesis, your views should predominate. 4. Generally, try to create a conversation among sources- be sure that yours is the major vice in the conversation. ➢ Applying techniques for reading to synthesize, especially when writing: • Subdivide the topic into parts, and give each part a brief title • Write cross-references for each part • Summarize each author’s information or ideas about each part • Forge relationships among reading selections. Note: Synthesis- a written discussion on which you gather and present source materials according to well defined purpose. End of Presentation