RFBT 13 Banking Laws
RFBT 13 Banking Laws
RFBT 13 Banking Laws
BANKING LAWS
BANK SECRECY LAW (RA 1405, AS AMENDED)
❖ Purpose: to give encouragement to the people to deposit their money in banking institutions and to
discourage private hoarding so that the same may be properly utilized by banks in authorized loans to
assist in the development of the country
❖ Prohibited Act: It shall be unlawful for any official or employee of a bank to disclose to any person or
for an independent auditor hired by a bank to conduct its regular audit to disclose to any person other
than a bank director, official or employee authorized by the bank, any information concerning said
deposits.
❖ Deposits covered:
1. Peso deposits: All deposits of whatever nature with banks or banking institutions in the Philippines
including investments in bonds issued by the Government of the Philippines, its political subdivisions and
its instrumentalities, are considered absolutely confidential and may not be examined, inquired or looked
into by any person, government official, bureau or office, unless:
a. When there is a written permission of the depositor or investor
b. Impeachment cases
c. Upon the order of a competent court in cases of bribery or dereliction of duty of public officials
d. Upon the order of a competent court in cases where the money deposited or invested is the
subject of litigation
e. Upon order of the competent court or tribunal in cases involving unexplained wealth under RA
3019
f. Upon inquiry by the Commissioner of BIR for the purpose of determining the net estate of a
deceased depositor
g. Upon the order of a competent court or in proper cases by the AMLC where there is probable
cause of money laundering and in some instances even without court order
h. Disclosure to the Treasurer of the Philippines for dormant deposits for at least 10 years under the
Unclaimed Balances Act (RA 3936)
i. Report of banks to AMLC of covered and/or suspicious transactions
j. Upon order of the CA, examination by law enforcement officers in terrorism cases under the
Human Security Act of 2007 (RA 9372)
k. Examination is made in the course of a special or general examination of bank and is specifically
authorized by MB after being satisfied that there is reasonable ground to believe that a bank fraud
or serious irregularity has been or is being committed and that is necessary to look into the
deposit to establish such fraud or irregularity
l. Examination is made by an independent auditor hired by the bank to conduct its regular audit
provided that the examination is for audit purposes only and the results thereof shall be for the
exclusive use of the bank
2. Foreign currency deposits: except:
a. When there is written consent of depositor under Section 8 of the Foreign Currency Deposits Act
(RA 6426)
b. Under Section 11 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act (probable cause established that it is related
to an unlawful activity as defined or money laundering)
c. Under Section 27 and 28 of the Human Security Act (existence of probable cause in anti-terrorism
cases and those involving persons charged with or suspected of the crime of terrorism or
conspiracy to commit terrorism, judicially declared and outlawed terrorist organization,
association, or group of persons, or member of such organization, association, or group of
persons)
❖ Garnishment: Bank accounts may be garnished by the creditors of the depositor. The amount of deposit
is not actually disclosed, hence, no violation. Exceptions:
1. Foreign currency deposits, Section 8 of RA 6426 (Note: In Salvacion v. Central Bank, GR 94723,
August 21, 1997, foreign currency deposits made by a transient or a tourist is not the kind of deposit
protected by law. Hence, a dollar deposit made by a transient or a tourist may be subject to
garnishment.)
2. Exempt under Rules of Court
❖ Penalties for violation: imprisonment of not more than 5 years or a fine not more than P20,000.00 or
both
❖ Insured Deposit: amount due to any bona fide depositor for legitimate deposits in an insured bank net
of any obligation of the depositor to the insured bank as of the date of closure, but not to exceed
P500,000.00
Under Section 22 of the PDIC Charter, a systemic risk refers to the possibility of failure of one bank to
settle net transactions with other banks will trigger a chain reaction, depriving other banks of funds
leading to a general shutdown of normal clearing and settlement activity. It also means the likelihood of
a sudden, unexpected collapse of confidence in a significant portion of the banking or financial system
with potentially large real economic effects.
❖ Coverage: The deposit liabilities of any bank or banking institution, which is engaged in the business of
receiving deposits as herein defined on the effective date of the PDIC Act, or which thereafter may engage
in the business of receiving deposits, shall be insured with the PDIC.
❖ Commencement of liability: PDIC shall commence the determination of insured deposits due the
depositors of a closed bank upon its actual takeover of the closed bank.
❖ Effect of payment: PDIC shall be subrogated to all rights of the depositor against the closed bank to the
extent of such payment. Such subrogation shall include the right on the part of PDIC to receive the same
dividends and payments from the proceeds of the assets of such closed bank and recoveries on account
of stockholders’ liability as would have been payable to the depositor on a claim for the insured deposits,
but such depositor shall retain his claim for any uninsured portion of his deposit.
Also, under Section 21 of the PDIC Charter, payment of an insured deposit to any person by PDIC shall
discharge the PDIC, and payment of transferred deposit to any person by the new bank or by an insured
❖ Uninsured Portion: The depositor shall retain his or her claim for any uninsured portion of his or her
deposit, which legal preference shall be the same as that of the subrogated claim of PDIC for its payment
of insured deposits.
❖ Preference: All payments by PDIC of insured deposits in closed banks partake of the nature of public
funds, and as such, must be considered a preferred credit similar to taxes due to the National Government
in the order of preference under Article 2244(9) of NCC, provided further, that this preference shall be
likewise effective upon liquidation proceedings already commenced and pending as of the approval of
PDIC Act, where no distribution of assets has been made.
❖ Failure to settle claim of insured depositor: Failure to settle the claim within 6 months from the date
of filing of claim for insured deposit, where such failure was due to grave abuse of discretion, gross
negligence, bad faith or malice, shall upon conviction, subject the directors, officers or employees of PDIC
responsible for the delay, to imprisonment from 6 months to one year, provided, that the period shall not
apply if the validity of the claim requires the resolution of issues of facts and/or law by another office,
body or agency.
❖ Failure of depositor to claim insured deposits: Unless otherwise waived by the PDIC, if the depositor
in the closed bank shall fail to claim his insured deposits with PDIC within 2 years from actual takeover
of the closed bank by the receiver, or does not enforce his claim filed with PDIC within 2 years after the
2-year period to file a claim, all rights of the depositor against the PDIC with respect to the insured deposit
shall be barred, however, all rights of the depositor against the closed bank and its shareholders or the
receivership estate to which PDIC may have become subrogated, shall thereupon revert to the depositor.
Thereafter, PDIC shall be discharged from any liability on the insured deposit.
❖ Splitting of deposits: occurs whenever a deposit account with an outstanding balance of more than the
statutory maximum amount of insured deposit maintained under the name of natural or juridical persons
is broken down and transferred into 2 or more accounts in the name/s of natural or juridical persons or
entities who have no beneficial ownership on transferred deposits in their names within 120 days
immediately preceding or during a bank declared bank holiday or immediately preceding a closure order
issued by the MB of BSP for the purpose of availing of the maximum deposit insurance coverage;
prohibited; punishable by imprisonment of not less than 6 years but not more than 12 years or a fine not
less than P50,000 but not more than P10,000,000, or both, at the discretion of the court.
❖ Injunction: No court, except the CA, shall issue any TRO, preliminary injunction or preliminary
mandatory injunction against PDIC for any action under PDIC Act. The SC may issue a restraining order
or injunction when the matter is of extreme urgency involving a constitutional issue, such that unless a
TRO is issued, grave injustice and irreparable injury will arise.
❖ Money Laundering: a crime whereby the proceeds of an unlawful activity are transacted, thereby
making them appear to have originated from legitimate sources
❖ How committed:
1. Any person knowing that any monetary instrument or property represents, involves or relates to, the
proceeds of any unlawful activity:
a. Transacts said money instrument or property;
b. Converts, transfers, disposes of, moves, acquires, possesses or uses said monetary instrument
or property;
c. Conceals or disguises the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement or ownership of or
rights with respect to said monetary instrument or property;
d. Attempts or conspires to commit money laundering offenses referred to in (a), (b) or (c);
e. Aids, abets, assists in or counsels the commission of the money laundering offenses referred to
in (a), (b) or (c); and
f. performs or fails to perform any act as a result of which he facilitates the offense of money
laundering referred to in (a), (b) or (c).
2. Any person knowing that a covered or suspicious is required to be reported to the AMLC, fails to do so
❖ Covered Transaction: a transaction in cash or other equivalent monetary instrument involving a total
amount in excess of P500,000.00 within one banking day; for covered persons like casinos, a single casino
cash transaction (involving the receipt of cash by a casino paid by or behalf of a customer or payout of
cash by a casino to a customer or to any person in his/her behalf) involving an amount in excess of
P5,000,000 or its equivalent in any other currency
❖ Excluded Persons: lawyers and accountants acting as independent legal professionals in relation to
information concerning their clients or where disclosure of information would compromise client
confidences or the attorney-client relationship
❖ Obligations of covered institutions:
1. Customer identification: Covered persons shall establish and record the true identity of its clients based
on official documents.
2. Record keeping: All records of all transactions of covered institutions shall be maintained and safely stored
for 5 years from the date of transactions.
3. Reporting of covered and suspicious transactions: Covered persons shall report to the AMLC all covered
transactions and suspicious transactions within 5 working days from occurrence thereof, unless the AMLC
concerned prescribes a different period not exceeding 15 working days.
4. Should a transaction be determined to be both a covered and a suspicious transaction, it shall be reported
as a suspicious transaction.
5. When reporting, it shall not be considered a violation of bank secrecy laws and similar laws. It shall be
prohibited from communicating, directly or indirectly, in any manner or by any means, to any person the
fact that a covered or suspicious transaction report was made, the content thereof, or any other
information in relation thereto.
6. Safe Harbor: No administrative, criminal, or civil proceedings, shall lie against any person for having made
a transaction report in the regular performance of his duties and in good faith, whether or not such results
in any criminal prosecution under Philippine laws.
❖ Suspicious Transaction: transactions with covered institutions, regardless of the amount involved,
where any of the following circumstances exist:
1. There is no underlying legal or trade obligation, purpose or economic justification
2. The client is not properly identified
3. The amount involved is not commensurate with the business or financial capacity of the client
4. Taking into account all known circumstances, it may be perceived that the client’s transaction is structured
in order to avoid being the subject of reporting requirements under the Act
5. Any circumstances relating to the transaction which is observed to deviate from the profile of the client
and/or the client’s past transactions with the covered institution
Definition of Terms
(1) "Board" means the Monetary Board of the Central Bank of the Philippines
(2) "Credit" means any loan, mortgage, deed of trust, advance, or discount; any conditional sales contract;
any contract to sell, or sale or contract of sale of property or services, either for present or future delivery, under
which part or all of the price is payable subsequent to the making of such sale or contract; any rental-purchase
contract; any contract or arrangement for the hire, bailment, or leasing of property; any option, demand, lien,
pledge, or other claim against, or for the delivery of, property or money; any purchase, or other acquisition of,
or any credit upon the security of, any obligation of claim arising out of any of the foregoing; and any transaction
or series of transactions having a similar purpose or effect
(3) "Finance charge" includes interest, fees, service charges, discounts, and such other charges incident to
the extension of credit as the Board may be regulation prescribe
(4) "Creditor" means any person engaged in the business of extending credit (including any person who as
a regular business practice make loans or sells or rents property or services on a time, credit, or installment basis,
either as principal or as agent) who requires as an incident to the extension of credit, the payment of a finance
charge
(5) "Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, or other organized group of
persons, or the legal successor or representative of the foregoing, and includes the Philippine Government or any
agency thereof, or any other government, or of any of its political subdivisions, or any agency of the foregoing
As such, Any creditor shall furnish to each person to whom credit is extended, prior to the consummation of the
transaction, a clear statement in writing setting forth, to the extent applicable and in accordance with rules and
regulations prescribed by the Board, the following information: (1) the cash price or delivered price of the property
or service to be acquired; (2) the amounts, if any, to be credited as down payment and/or trade-in; (3) the
difference between the amounts set forth under clauses (1) and (2); (4) the charges, individually itemized, which
are paid or to be paid by such person in connection with the transaction but which are not incident to the extension
of credit; (5) the total amount to be financed; (6) the finance charge expressed in terms of pesos and centavos;
and (7) the percentage that the finance bears to the total amount to be financed expressed as a simple annual
rate on the outstanding unpaid balance of the obligation
The disclosure statement in writing is a required attachment to the credit transaction contract. The borrower
has a right to demand a copy of the disclosure statement. It is not just banks and other financial institutions that
must follow these requirements. Any person in the business of extending loans, or selling or renting property or
services on a time, credit, or installment basis, either as principal or as agent, is required to make the same
written disclosure.
In the case of Development Bank of the Philippines vs Arcilla, the creditor’s failure to comply with these
requirements does not mean that the debt is forgiven, or that the goods purchased on credit or installment basis
are deemed fully paid. The transactions remain valid and enforceable. The lender, however, will have no right to
collect such charge or increases thereof, even if stipulated in the promissory note.
In UCPB vs Veloso, the SC held that a promissory note which grants the creditor the power to unilaterally fix
the interest rate means that the promissory note does not contain a clear statement in writing of the finance
charge.
Such provision is illegal not only because it violates the principle of mutuality of contracts but it also
contravenes the Truth in Lending law. In case there is a violation, the borrower may file a civil case for recovery
of damages in the amount of Php 100 or of twice the finance charged required by the creditor, whichever is
greater, but not to exceed P2,000. A criminal case may also be filed against the creditor. The action to recover
the penalty should be brought within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation.
PDIC LAW
1. All deposits of any bank are insured with the:
A. BSP C. PDIC
B. Insurance Commission D. Monetary Board
2. Insured deposit means the net amount due to any depositor for deposits in an insured bank but should
not exceed:
A. P1,000,000 C. P250,000
B. P500,000 D. P300,000
BANK SECRECY
6. All deposits of whatever nature with banks or banking institutions in the Philippines including investments
in bonds issued by the Government of the Philippines, its political subdivisions and its instrumentalities, are
considered __ and may not be examined, inquired or looked into by any person, government official, bureau
or office.
A. Totally confidential C. Definitely confidential
B. Generally confidential D. Absolutely confidential
7. In order for a depositor or investor to waive the secrecy of his deposits and/or investments, his waiver
must be:
A. In writing
B. Made orally or in writing
C. Communicated as soon as possible to the bank manager
D. Made orally only
8. The secrecy of foreign currency deposits are not applicable (1) when there is written consent of
depositor, (2) under Section 11 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and (3) under Sections 27 and 28 of the
Human Security Act.
A. 1 and 2 only C. All of three
B. 1 and 3 only D. All of three
9. There is no secrecy of bank deposits when the banks report to the Anti-Money Laundering Council the
following transaction/s:
A. Covered only
B. Suspicious only
C. Covered and/or suspicious
D. None can be reported without violating the secrecy of bank deposits
10. There is no secrecy of bank deposits if ordered by the __, the examination by law enforcement officers
in terrorism cases.
A. Regional Trial Court C. Municipal Trial Court
B. Court of Appeals D. Supreme Court
11. Who may inquire into the bank deposits and investment for the purpose of determining the net estate of
a deceased depositor and investor?
A. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
B. Assistant Commissioner of Internal Revenue
C. BIR Regional Director
D. BIR Examiner
12. Which court can order the disclosure of bank deposits in cases where the money deposited or invested
is the subject of litigation?
A. Court of Appeals C. Supreme Court
B. Regional Trial Court D. Any competent court
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING
13. Suspicious transactions refer to transactions with covered institutions, regardless of the amount
involved, where any of the following circumstances exist:
A. No underlying legal or trade obligation, purpose or economic justification
B. Client is properly identified
C. Amount involved commensurate with client’s business or financial capacity
D. Based on all known circumstances, it may be perceived that client’s transaction is not structured in
order to avoid being subject of reporting requirements
14. Jewelry dealer is a covered institution if it deals in precious metals, who as a business or trade in excess
of:
A. P10,000,000 C. P1,000,000
B. P5,000,000 D. P500,000
15. A covered person is obligated to keep records for how many years?
A. 5 B. 4 C. 3 C. 2
1. C 11. A 21. B
2. B 12. D 22. D
3. A 13. A 23. B
4. C 14. C 24. C
5. C 15. A 25. A
6. D 16. A 26. C
7. A 17. C 27. A
8 C 18. A 28. B
9. C 19. B 29. A
10. B 20. A