Explanation Rizal
Explanation Rizal
Explanation Rizal
Is it genuine, or it is an act of forgery. One of the controversial issues in the study of life
works and writings of rizal is the historicity and veracity of certain acts, which allegedly
result had performed a few moments before he was led out to execution. More
specifically this alleged reconciliation with the Catholic Church and his objurgation of
masonry, known as the RETRATCTION.
Before we proceed and before we go on to our discussion lets define forirst what do we
mean by retraction
So retraction is A public statement made about an earlier statement that withdraws, cancels,
refutes, or reverse the original statement or ceases and desists from publishing the original
statement.
Ito yung pagtanggi sa naunang nasabi o sa kahit na anumang action na nagpapayahg ng pagbabago ng
damdamin ng taong gumawa nito, so sa madaling salita ito ay pagsisisi o pagbawi sa ginawa mo sa isang
tao or sa grupo ng mga tao.
Such document purportedly exists, allegedly signed by Rizal a few hours before his
execution.
This document, referred to as "The Retraction" declares Rizal's belief in the Catholic
faith, and takes back everything he wrote against the Church.
• The said document was found by Fr. Manuel Garcia
ilang oras bago siya barilin, pinirmahan daw ni Rizal ang isang dokumento na
nagsasabing siya raw ay isang Katoliko at binabawi niya lahat ng kanyang mga sinulat
laban sa simbahan. Nakilala ang dokumento bilang ang retraktasyon, “The
Retraction.”
DID RIZAL RETRACT HIS MASONIC AFFILIATION? Rizal stated in his retraction...
"I abominate IBIG SABIHIN ITINATAKWIL NA NYA Masonry as the enemy of the Church and reprobated
by the same "Church" (Rizal, "The Retraction Letter": 1996)
That style is as simple as mine. Don't bother Father, to read it all. Dictate what i ought to profess or
express, and shall write, making in any case some remarks" (Pal 1896) Declaration or retraction was
signed together with Dr Rizal by Senior Fresco, Chief of the Picket, and Señor Moure, Adjutant of the
Plaza
2. yung laman daw nung kanyang retraction paper ay gawa ng mga kastila, yung
sasabihin mi rizal, yung gusto na yang magretract pero parang sinsabing hindi nya
alam yung kanyang isuuslat, pero nung binigyan sya ng retraction paper for him to
sign parang binago nya pa. so yung bbinasa ko kanina na letter yun na yung laman ng
retraction paper.
DID RIZAL AND JOSEPHINE GOT MARRIED?
Father Balaguer testified he married Rizal and Josephine on Dec. 30 at 6 o'clock in the morning. After his
marriage, Rizal dedicated a Catholic devotion book, De la Imitacion de Cristo, to josephine. The
dedication read as follows: "to my dear and unhappy wife Josephine". (Garcia, 1964)
3. Hindi si fr. Balaguer ang nagkasal kundi si fr. Vicente Garcia daw ang nagkasal kay
rizal at Josephine
ANTI
-Remember ha 1896 binitay si rizal, pero yung retraction Paper ay lumabas lang nung 1935
so almost 40 yrs. Syang nawawala. Syempre kung Ganon kahalaga yung dokumento,
dapat pag ingatan sya ng mga pari diba so kaya nasabi ni pascual na hindi sulat ni rizal
yung laman ng letter of retraction.
-sila yung mga hindi naniniwala, Saka kung nagretarct si rizal parang Ang inaano kase ng
marami, inaargue ng marami BAKIT NATIN SYA PAMBANSANG BAYANI?kung talagang
nag retract sya diba, kase parang naging duwag sya na babawiin nya rin pala yung mga
sinabi nya sa huli , para lang maikasal sa isang babae, kase kaya lang nya binawi hindi
lang dahil gusto nyang bumalik sa church, pero ginawa lang daw nya yon dahil sa isang
babae na si Josephine Bracken
PRO
According to Dr. Del Rosario naniniwala syang si rizal Ang sumulat ng retraction.