Transportation Lag
Transportation Lag
Transportation Lag
CHAPTER 7
SECOND-ORDER SYSTEM
Transfer Function
A second-order system can arise from two first-order systems in series.
Some systems are inherently second-order, and they do not result from a
series combination of two first-order systems.
Inherently second-order systems are not extremely common in chemical engineering
applications.
Most second-order systems that we encounter will result from the addition of a
controller to a first-order process.
The term for the skin friction at the wall is obtained from the Hagen-Poiseuille
relationship for laminar flow .
Note that V is the average velocity of the fluid in the tube, which is also the
velocity of the interface, which is equal to
The momentum correction factor b accounts for the fact that the fluid has a
parabolic velocity profile in the tube, and the momentum must be expressed as
b mV for laminar flow.
The value of b for laminar flow is 4/3.
Substituting the appropriate terms produces the desired force balance equation
for the manometer.
• Dividing both sides by rg ( p D2/4), we arrive at the standard form for a second-
order system.
If the fluid column is motionless ( dY/dt =0) and located at its rest position
(Y= 0) before the forcing function is applied, the Laplace transform
The quadratic term in this equation may be factored into two linear terms that
contain the roots
-
For this case, the inversion of Eq. yields the result
This is true for z > 1 because the roots s1 and s2 are real,
Decay ratio
The decay ratio is defined as the ratio of the sizes of successive peaks and is given
by C/A in Figure.
The decay ratio is related to z by the expression
Notice that larger z means greater damping, hence greater decay.
Rise time This is the time required for the response to first reach its ultimate value
and is labeled tr in Figure.
The reader can verify from Figure that tr increases with increasing z.
Response time This is the time required for the response to come within 5
percent of its ultimate value and remain there.
The response time is indicated in Figure. The limits 5 percent are arbitrary, and other
limits can be used for defining a response time.
where T is the period of oscillation (time/cycle), T is the time elapsed between peaks.
It is also the time elapsed between alternate crossings of the line Y = 1.
Notice that for z < 0.5 the natural frequency is nearly the same as the actual
frequency.
As in the case of the step input, the nature of the response to a unit impulse will
depend on whether the roots of the denominator of Equation are real or complex.
The problem is again divided into the three cases shown in Table , and each is
discussed below.
CASE I IMPULSE RESPONSE FOR z < 1
CASE II IMPULSE RESPONSE FOR FOR
Terms such as decay ratio, period of oscillation, etc., may also be used to describe the
impulse response.
Sinusoidal Response
Depending upon the values of z and wt. This is in direct contrast to the sinusoidal
response of the first-order system, where the ratio of the output amplitude to the input
amplitude is always less than 1.
The output lags the input by phase angle |f|.
TRANSPORTATION LAG
A phenomenon that is often present in flow systems is the transportation lag.
Synonyms for this term are dead time and distance velocity lag.
The transportation lag parameter t is simply the time needed for a particle of fluid to
flow from the entrance of the tube to the exit, and it can be calculated from the
expression
We shall see in a later chapter that the presence of a transportation lag in a control
system can make it much more difficult to control.
In general, such lags should be avoided if possible by placing equipment close
together. They can seldom be entirely eliminated.
APPROXIMATION OF TRANSPORT LAG.
The transport lag is quite different from the other transfer functions (first-order, second-
order, etc.)
It is not a rational function (i.e., a ratio of polynomials.)
• The transport lag can also be difficult to simulate by computer.
• For these reasons, several approximations of transport lag that are
useful in control calculations are presented here.
• One approach to approximating the transport lag is to write e-t s as
1/ et s and to express the denominator as a Taylor series;
the result is
Expanding numerator and denominator in a Taylor series and keeping only terms
of first-order give
Equation (7.48) is not merely the ratio of two Taylor series; it has been optimized to
give a better approximation.
• The step responses of the three approximations of transport lag presented in Figure.
The step response of ets is also shown for comparison.
• Notice that the response for the first-order Padé approximation drops to 1 before rising
exponentially toward 1.
• The response for the second order Padé approximation jumps to 1 and then descends
to below 0 before returning gradually back to 1.
• Although none of the approximations for e-ts is very accurate, the approximation
for e-t s is more useful when it is multiplied by several first-order or second-order
transfer functions.
• In this case, the other transfer functions filter out the high-frequency
content of the signals passing through the transport lag, with the result that the
transport lag approximation,
• when combined with other transfer functions, provides a satisfactory
result in many cases. The accuracy of a transport lag can be evaluated most clearly
in terms of frequency response, a topic covered later in this book.