The document discusses several topics related to constitutional law:
1) It discusses the validity of eminent domain laws and the rights of landowners to just compensation determined by an impartial court.
2) It discusses the elements of due process, including substantive and procedural due process rights.
3) It summarizes a Supreme Court case ruling that allowed a retired individual to run for office again.
4) It defines the constitution and discusses the purpose and supremacy of the constitution.
The document discusses several topics related to constitutional law:
1) It discusses the validity of eminent domain laws and the rights of landowners to just compensation determined by an impartial court.
2) It discusses the elements of due process, including substantive and procedural due process rights.
3) It summarizes a Supreme Court case ruling that allowed a retired individual to run for office again.
4) It defines the constitution and discusses the purpose and supremacy of the constitution.
The document discusses several topics related to constitutional law:
1) It discusses the validity of eminent domain laws and the rights of landowners to just compensation determined by an impartial court.
2) It discusses the elements of due process, including substantive and procedural due process rights.
3) It summarizes a Supreme Court case ruling that allowed a retired individual to run for office again.
4) It defines the constitution and discusses the purpose and supremacy of the constitution.
The document discusses several topics related to constitutional law:
1) It discusses the validity of eminent domain laws and the rights of landowners to just compensation determined by an impartial court.
2) It discusses the elements of due process, including substantive and procedural due process rights.
3) It summarizes a Supreme Court case ruling that allowed a retired individual to run for office again.
4) It defines the constitution and discusses the purpose and supremacy of the constitution.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 5
Constitutional law 1
Matthew Gary Deleverio Hinoguin
Block B 1. a. No, the law is not valid. With respect to the validity of exercise of power of eminent domain in relation to presuppose an equivalent compensation for the property being expropriated, it is just that the determination of the compensation will be examined by the impartial court for this will contravene the rights of the private owner to his property. b. If I am the lawyer of the landowner, I will first reiterate to him his rights as a landowner as well as the scope and limitations of a state to exercise expropriation. We will then raise a valid and actual case against NIA to question the law with respect to their authority to determine and presuppose the just compensation that is due to my client. c. Legal actions that I may take to protect my client’s rights is first, I will file a petition to reexamine the validity of such law in which NIA was given a sole and exclusive authority to determine the compensation for the ground of deprivation of his property rights in relation to determining the just compensation. d. If I am the government lawyer, my defense would be based on the legal principle of, “to doubt is to sustain.” The presumption of the validity or constitutionality of a law being passed is that such laws have already been carefully examined and been studied by the legislature prior to its enactment in which its purpose and intendment is for the welfare of the general public and for justice to prevail. e. If I am the impartial judge, considering all the substantial facts presented to me by both the parties and the laws that should be applied, I will rule in favor of the landowner because he is the one who will be deprived of his rights and be a subject to sustain damages due to a loss through a possible partial determination of compensation. 2. a. Due process -according to Justice Frankfurter of U.S Supreme court states that dues process is the embodiment of sporting idea of fair play. b. due process clause -the due process clause pursuant to art.3 of the constitution states that no person shall deprived of life, liberty and property without the due process of law c. substantive vs procedural -substantive due process requires intrinsic validity of law interfering with the rights of a person to his life, liberty and property while procedural due process has the legal concept of hearing the subject matter first before it condemns or rendering judgment only upon lawful hearing. d. opinion of SC on Ynot case -the court has declared that while lower courts should observe a becoming modesty in examining constitutional questions, they are nonetheless not prevented from resolving the same whenever warranted, and is only subjected to review by the highest tribunal. e. essential elements of due process 1. there must be an impartial court or tribunal with judicial power to hear and determine the matter 2. the impartial court must lawfully acquire jurisdiction over the person of the defendant and property in which is the subject matter of the proceeding 3. the defendant must be given opportunity to be heard 4. judgment must be rendered upon lawful hearing f. opportunity to be heard -important element of due process in which a person is entitled to defend or gather evidences regarding the matter of the proceeding to render an idea of fair play. 3. Dumlao vs Comelec -the SC ruled that an opportunity for the young and new generation should be given to them for Dumlao has already enjoyed the benefits of his retirement and because of it, he was not allowed to run for the same position, discrimination aside. 4. a. Constitution according to Justice Cooley- the body of rules and maxims in accordance with which the powers of sovereignty are habitually exercised. Constitution according to Justice Malcom- a written instrument enacted by the direct action of the people in which the three fundamental powers of the state are established, limited and defined, and which those powers are distributed to the several departments of the government for their safe and useful exercise for the benefit of body politic b. purpose of the constitution -to create a permanent framework of system of the government in which liberty can be regulated validly c. supremacy of the constitution -The Constitution is the basic and paramount law in which all laws must conform and which all persons including the highest official of the land must defer. No act shall be valid however noble it is if it conflicts with the Constitution. The Constitution must ever remain supreme. All must bow to the mandate of this law. Expediency is not allowed to sap its strength nor the greed for power debase its rectitude. Right or wrong, the Constitution must be upheld as long as it has not been changed by the sovereign people, lest disregard its result in the usurpation of the majesty of law by the pretenders of illegitimate power. 5. procedure to amend or revise -proposal to amend or revise is made by the majority members of the congress (3/4 of total members), if the amendment or revision in the constitution is proposed, this is to be referred to the constitutional convention in which 2/3 of the total votes from the members of the congress is required. The constitutional convention then adheres to the amendment or let its constituents decide. An amendment then be valid only when it’s ratified by the majority of votes casted upon a plebiscite not earlier than 60 days or later than 90 days. 6. A. fundamental powers of the state a. police power b. power of eminent domain c. power of taxation B. Similarities: -it is inherent, indispensable, interferes with private rights, presupposes an equivalent compensation for the rights interfered with, and they are exercised by the government Differences: -the police power regulates both liberty and property, power of eminent domain and taxation regulates only property. -the property taken by the police power is destroyed because it is noxious or has noxious purpose and it may pose danger to the general welfare. The property taken by the rest of the powers are for public use. -the police power and power of taxation is exercised by the government. The power of eminent domain may be exercised by some private entities. -the compensation by the police power is intangible, the compensation of the rest of the powers are concrete. C. double taxation -not constitutional. Double taxation in a general sense is not valid however there is no provision that prohibits this act. D. ruling on ASLP vs sec. of DAR - The Supreme Court ruled that the agrarian reform measures are constitutional. The Court held that the measures were enacted in accordance with the powers granted to the President under martial law and the Transitory Provisions of the 1987 Constitution. The Court also held that the measures did not violate the right to just compensation and due process, as they provided for the payment of just compensation and the opportunity for landowners to be heard. 7. a. Ynot case: - the court has declared that while lower courts should observe a becoming modesty in examining constitutional questions, they are nonetheless not prevented from resolving the same whenever warranted, and is only subjected to review by the highest tribunal. b. Calalang vs Williams -the promotion of social justice does not involve misguided sympathy toward any specific group. Social justice does not align with communism or anarchy. Instead, it entails making laws more humane and equalizing social and economic forces through government actions. These actions aim to ensure the welfare of all citizens by maintaining economic stability and a fair balance in social relationships. This can be achieved through constitutional measures or, when necessary, by using the government's inherent powers, always with the principle that the well-being of the people is the highest law. Social justice recognizes the interdependence of diverse segments of society and the need to protect all groups equally. Lastly, it seeks to promote the health, comfort, and well-being of all individuals, striving for the greatest good for the greatest number.
Remarks of Mr. Calhoun of South Carolina on the bill to prevent the interference of certain federal officers in elections: delivered in the Senate of the United States February 22, 1839
Constitution of the State of North Carolina and Copy of the Act of the General Assembly Entitled An Act to Amend the Constitution of the State of North Carolina
Joseph Siminoff, Ida Gottesman, Anna Taffler, Benny Saltzman, Felix Kusman, Rose Lightcap and Martin Young v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director of the Third District of the Immigration and Naturalization Service at New York, New York, 267 F.2d 705, 2d Cir. (1959)
Remarks of Mr. Calhoun of South Carolina on the bill to prevent the interference of certain federal officers in elections: delivered in the Senate of the United States February 22, 1839
Constitution of the State of North Carolina and Copy of the Act of the General Assembly Entitled An Act to Amend the Constitution of the State of North Carolina
Joseph Siminoff, Ida Gottesman, Anna Taffler, Benny Saltzman, Felix Kusman, Rose Lightcap and Martin Young v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director of the Third District of the Immigration and Naturalization Service at New York, New York, 267 F.2d 705, 2d Cir. (1959)