Optical Optogenetics
Optical Optogenetics
Optical Optogenetics
201200087
Review
Brain intricacies and the difficulty that scientists encounter in revealing its function with standard approaches
such as electrical stimulation of neurons have led to the exploration of new tools that enable the study of neural
circuits in a remote and non-invasive way. To this end, optogenetics has initialised a revolution for neuroscience
in the last decade by enabling simultaneous monitoring and stimulation of specific neuronal populations in intact
brain preparations through genetically targeted expression of light sensitive proteins and molecular photoswitches.
In addition to ongoing molecular probe development and optimisation, novel optical techniques hold immense
potential to amplify and diversify the utility of optogenetic methods. Importantly, by improving the spatio-temporal
resolution of light stimulation, neural circuits can be photoactivated in patterns mimicking endogenous physiological
processes. The following synopsis addresses the possibilities and limitations of optical stimulation methods applied
to and developed for activation of neuronal optogenetic tools.
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1
E. Papagiakoumou
neuronal stimulation. The idea of using light as an coalesced to form the field of optogenetics (Deisseroth
alternative way to stimulate neurons is not new, how- et al., 2006; Miesenböck, 2009).
ever, dating back to 1971 when Richard Fork used Excitation of the cells expressing such photosen-
laser light to stimulate nerve cells (Fork, 1971). Al- sitive compounds is most commonly accomplished
though Fork’s approach was not widely adopted at by illuminating the sample with a common epi-
that time, probably because the cellular response he fluorescence lamp or a light-emitting diode (LED).
got was considered a result of side effects, today a This illumination method is simple to implement
growing number of researchers choose light in place and easily adaptable to in vivo applications through
of electrodes as a less invasive wireless form of activa- an optical fibre. Its lack of specificity has been coun-
tion (Scanziani and Hausser, 2009). Moreover, light terweighed by targeting photosensitive proteins to
enables communication with many receivers in par- specific neuronal subpopulations with specific gene
allel with spatial and temporal resolution adequate to promoters. Thus, although the light is incident across
follow the dynamics of physiological processes. Since a large field, only targeted neurons are excited. The
1971, another work reporting laser irradiation of neu- majority of current studies utilise channelrhodopsin-2
rons was published in 1983 by Farber and Grinvald (ChR2), a cation channel highly sensitive to vis-
(1983), who used laser excitation of leech neurons ible light. In ChR2-expressing neurons, APs can
stained with a fluorescent dye to evoke action po- be evoked with excitation powers of approximately
tentials (APs) in the cells. In the 1990s, the develop- 1 mW/mm2 at the maximal absorption wavelength of
ment of caged glutamate enabled indirect photostim- 470 nm, and thus, wide-field illumination with blue
ulation of neurons through photolysis of glutamate light provides effective excitation. Indeed, the high
with flash lamps or lasers (Callaway and Katz, 1993; sensitivity of ChR2 has been critical for its success-
Katz and Dalva, 1994). Later, pulsed femtosecond ful utilisation, especially for in vivo studies (Aravanis
lasers were utilised for neuronal stimulation through et al., 2007; Gradinaru et al., 2007).
partial disruption of cell membranes (Hirase et al., Still, elaborated photosensitive tools for neuronal
2002). stimulation require elaborated methods to exploit
The real revolution, however, came when stud- their full potential. This is something that was un-
ies on rendering neurons actively responding to derstood from the beginning; Richard Fork finishes
light started coming up. The laboratories of Gero his article on neuronal photoactivation with the fol-
Miesenböck, while at Memorial Sloan-Kettering lowing phrase: ‘Attempts are being made to improve
Cancer Center, and of Ehud Isacoff, Richard H. this technique by limiting the area of stimulation
Kramer and Dirk Trauner, then all at the Univer- still further’. To individuate subsets of genetically
sity of California, Berkeley, employed methods to identical connected cells, for example, or establish
genetically engineer and target proteins that directly the role of specific spatiotemporal excitatory patterns
alter membrane conductivity upon light illumina- in guiding animal behaviour, innovative optical tech-
tion of specific wavelength (Zemelman et al., 2002; niques are needed, able to modulate stimulation for
Banghart et al., 2004). The revolution continued with reproducing physiological patterns of neuronal acti-
functional expression of natural photosensitive pro- vation. This is, however, a challenging technical issue
teins that can be used as cell actuators, such as chan- due to the complexity of neuronal systems in terms
nelrhodopsin (Nagel et al., 2003), and light-activated of spatiotemporal precision.
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs; Panda et al., The following review details optical methods used
2005; Qiu et al., 2005; Levitz et al., 2013), as so far for optogenetics as well as recent technical
well as genetically encoded fluorescent proteins, both developments and their potential applications. The
calcium-based (Nakai et al., 2001) and voltage-based techniques presented here will be discussed specifi-
(Siegel and Isacoff, 1997; Dimitrov et al., 2007), that cally in the context of optogenetic applications, but
can be used as functional reporters of neuronal ac- in principle can be extended to any application de-
tivity. Continued efforts to improve the performance manding spatially and temporally precise light stim-
of these molecular innovations for study of neuronal ulation, such as photolysis of caged neurotransmit-
function and treatment of diseases and disorders have ters, morphological and functional imaging.
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 3
E. Papagiakoumou
instance, by combining optogenetics with func- to combine photoactivation with fluorescent func-
tional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), inves- tional reporters wherein the use of wide-field excita-
tigators verified that the firing of local excitatory tion often reduces the S/N ratio, due to out-of-focus
neurons is sufficient to trigger downstream haemo- fluorescence signal.
dynamic phenomena detected by fMRI scanners (Lee
et al., 2010) or to facilitate appropriate plasticity Patterned visible excitation
by guiding the cortical reorganisation after nerve in- Light patterning techniques enable fast, remote
jury (Li et al., 2011). In addition, photostimulation modification of the spatial configuration of light de-
of the light-activated chloride pump halorhodopsin livered to tissue, without the need to intervene on
from Natronomonas pharaonis (eNpHR) (Zhang et al., the optical setup during the experiment. Such tech-
2007) or of the K+ -channel small molecule photo- niques can be useful for stimulating a subpopulation
switch AAQ (acrylamide-azobenzene-quaternary am- of genetically identical neurons or targeting subcel-
monium; Fortin et al., 2008) allows restoration of lular structures, such as dendrites, axons or dendritic
visual responses in mice and in human ex vivo retinas spines. Several schemes have been proposed to per-
(Busskamp et al., 2010; Polosukhina et al., 2012). form spatial shaping of the excitation beam, gener-
ChR2 activation was used to control heart muscle ally classified into two categories: scanning methods,
both in vitro and in vivo (Bruegmann et al., 2010), in which serial excitation of several regions of inter-
and breathing in anaesthetised mice (Depuy et al., est (ROIs) is performed by rapidly scanning the laser
2011). Optogenetic stimulation also shows promise focus, and parallel methods, in which all ROIs are
for treating mental diseases, already used to reveal simultaneously excited.
that cholinergic interneurons can block cocaine con-
ditioning (Witten et al., 2010) and to activate fear Scanning methods
memory recall (Liu et al., 2012). Moreover, optoge- The easiest way to create pattern-like excitation is
netic tools have been used to treat sleeping disor- by scanning a focused laser beam (Katz and Dalva,
ders by stimulating hypocretin neurons implicated 1994). This approach has been used to map synaptic
in narcolepsy (Adamantidis et al., 2007), to stimu- connectivity by photostimulating ChR2 with blue
late dopamine neurons in order to understand their laser radiation focused to a small spot (∼1 μm) and
function in depression and substance abuse (Tsai et al., scanned over different locations to assess light sensi-
2009), to acquire fundamental knowledge for Parkin- tivity (Wang et al., 2007a). Other investigators fo-
son’s disease and the mechanisms of action of ther- cused the laser to a near cylindrical beam of 6 to
apeutic interventions (Kravitz et al., 2010) and to 16 μm full width at half-maximum (FWHM),
control the activity of neocortical parvalbumin in- scanned over the dendrites of the recorded neuron
terneurons, implicated to mental dysfunctions char- (Petreanu et al., 2009). Single-cell scanning excita-
acteristic of schizophrenia or autism (Cardin et al., tion of ChR2 was also recently used to map network
2009; Sohal et al., 2009). connections between two distinct cortical inhibitory
In combination with the high sensitivity to visi- networks of the visual cortex in vivo (Wilson et al.,
ble wavelengths, the above-mentioned examples were 2012). In these examples, the position of the laser
made possible through a remarkable development beam was changed by rapidly deflecting its direc-
of gene delivery methods including viral expression, tion with a pair of galvanometer-driven mirrors that
transgenic mice, in utero electroporation (see Zhang dictated the position of the spot in x and y. Such scan-
et al., 2010 for a complete description of genetic ning systems are now commercially available and can
strategies to target specific neuronal populations). be easily adapted to standard microscopes by imag-
Both the resounding success and limitations of early ing the scanner with a telescope to the back aperture
optogenetic studies manifested the need for more flex- of the objective (Figure 1A). The main advantage
ible and specific illumination tools to differentially of scanning the beam with mirrors is that there are
activate cells of the same population or to target sub- no significant light losses in the optical path. How-
cellular structures. Thus, the development of optical ever, scan speed is limited by mechanical inertia and
techniques that offer higher spatial and temporal re- by the dwell time necessary to generate a sufficient
solution has become a necessity, especially for efforts physiological response (scanning frequencies of few
kHz have been reported; Gasparini and Magee, 2006). Nguyen et al., 2001) or acousto-optic deflectors
Thus, although scanning has been successfully ap- (AODs) (Reddy et al., 2008) to deflect the beam’s
plied to excite single cells, the scan speed limitation path much faster with frequencies reaching tens of
has hindered application of this method to neural kHz. Resonant scanning galvanometer mirrors are
network questions requiring simultaneous stimula- mirrors that oscillate in a sinusoid manner. These de-
tion of multiple neurons. vices cycle at a resonant frequency on the order of
Scan speed limitations can be addressed in part by 4 to 8 kHz, while bidirectional scanning increases
using resonant scanning mirrors (Fan et al., 1999; the effective scan rate to approximately 16 kHz
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 5
E. Papagiakoumou
(Fan et al., 1999). AODs are devices in which a manipulating the activity of neurons expressing the
propagating sound wave of radio frequency through ameliorated chimera variant of channelrhodopsin
an acousto-optic medium establishes a grating that ChIEF (Lin et al., 2009), achieving high temporal
diffracts a laser beam at a precise angle, which can resolution with single-photon excitation (1PE).
be modified within few microseconds by changing Scanning methods, even those using resonant scan-
the frequency of the sound wave. When a monochro- ners or AODs to achieve fast scan rates, remain serial
matic light beam traverses an AOD, a large fraction approaches limited by the dwell time, a parameter in-
of light is ‘deflected’ at an angle, θ, that is linearly dependent of how fast the beam is scanned from one
related to the sound frequency, f: θ = λf/v, where λ site to another. Exciting one or two cells (Wang et al.,
is the wavelength of the incident light and υ is the 2011) in a ‘simultaneous’ manner may be possible by
velocity of the propagating sound wave. This effect the long opening time of opsins (Lin et al., 2009).
can be used for highly versatile inertia-free scanning However, as temporal resolution of scanning meth-
schemes, because the deflection angle is controlled ods, TS , is determined by the sum of the scan time (ts )
by electronically generated frequencies without and the dwell time (tdwell ) for each visited position:
moving any mass-containing elements (i.e. mir- TS = N(tS + tdwell ), where N is the number of visited
rors). Consequently, a two-AOD scanning system en- sites, the number of cells that can be serially accessed
ables two-dimensional (2D) patterns in discontinuous for near-simultaneous stimulation is quickly limited.
scan modes, and more complex four-AOD configu-
rations, with counter-propagating chirped acoustic Parallel methods
waves enable in addition axial scanning of the laser Parallel excitation methods arose as a solution for the
beam (Reddy and Saggau, 2005; Reddy et al., 2008). ‘simultaneity’ problem. These methods utilise spa-
However, the excitation field that can be achieved tial light modulators (SLMs) to change the intensity
with AODs is small compared with scanning mir- profile of the laser beam. In this way, 2D or 3D dis-
rors, (typical values 150 × 150 – 200 × 200 μm2 ; tributions of multiple diffraction-limited spots and
Shoham et al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2008) depending arbitrary excitation patterns mimicking cellular mor-
on the available range of acoustic frequencies, which phology can be realised at the sample plane. Hence,
defines the maximum beam deflection angle. More- parallel methods enable high spatial flexibility, as il-
over, as AODs are diffracting elements, they have a lumination patterns can be easily adapted to different
certain diffraction efficiency (ratio of light that goes to experimental requirements within the same optical
the first diffraction order relative to the total amount configuration. The beam incident on the SLM can
of light entering the AODs) that ranges between 50% be described as an electromagnetic wave of a certain
and 70% for a two-AOD scanning system (Shoham amplitude, A, and spatial phase, : ε = Aei , where
et al., 2005; Losavio et al., 2009). Recently, new i is the imaginary unit. Thus, beam modulation can
design concepts that improve the performance of a be achieved either by modulating the amplitude or
4-AOD system have been presented, with the possi- the phase with the SLM.
bility to image neuronal somata within a volume of
700 × 700 × 1400 μm3 and dendrites within a vol- Amplitude modulation
ume of 290 × 290 × 200 μm3 (Katona et al., 2012). Amplitude modulation is performed by directly shap-
Resonant scanners have been used mainly for ing the intensity of light in a plane conjugated to
2P calcium imaging (Fan et al., 1999; Nguyen the sample plane (Figure 1B). The SLMs most com-
et al., 2001; Rochefort et al., 2009), whereas AOD monly utilised for this configuration are digital mi-
scanners have been widely used in 2D for uncaging cromirror devices (DMDs), which are arrays of mi-
applications (Shoham et al., 2005; Losavio et al., cromirrors (commercially available devices with up
2009) and 2P calcium imaging (Salomé et al., 2006; to 1024 × 768 or 1920 × 1080 individual micromir-
Otsu et al., 2008), also including three dimensions rors) suspended on air gap and controlled electrostat-
(3D) (Reddy and Saggau, 2005; Reddy et al., 2008; ically. Each mirror can be rotated along its diagonal
Katona et al., 2012). In addition, investigators by ±12◦ from the unpowered position via a control
recently used AODs to photostimulate optoge- signal (Knapczyk and Krishnan, 2005). In this way,
netic actuators (Wang et al., 2011), specifically light can be independently deflected by each mirror
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 7
E. Papagiakoumou
et al., 2012), its utility for 1PE of optogenetic tools Figure 2 Single-photon holographic excitation of ChR2
was only recently demonstrated in stimulation of
(A) Wide-field fluorescence images of HEK cells express-
ChR2-expressing retinal ganglion cells of blinded
ing GFP-tagged ChR2-H134R (top) are superimposed with
retinas for bionic vision restoration (Reutsky-Gefen holographic illumination patterns imaged on a thin layer of
et al., 2013). Figure 2 illustrates another example of rhodamin-6G (in purple). The fluorescence excitation of each
1P holographic excitation of ChR2-expressing HEK spot is shown separately (inset). Underneath each image
cells and cultured neurons. Specifically, Figure 2A is the corresponding electrophysiology recorded whole-cell
shows holographic excitation extended over an entire current evoked by holographic photostimulation of ChR2.
cell’s surface, also demonstrating DH’s fine spatial (B) Wide-field fluorescence image of a cultured neuron ex-
specificity, as patched cells register no response when pressing GFP-tagged ChR2-H134R (top). Whole-cell currents
patterned light is delivered to neighbouring cells. (middle) evoked by holographic photostimulation of ChR2 on
Figure 2B illustrates modulation of the induced pho- the cell soma (black trace) or on the principal dendrite (red
tocurrent by exciting the whole soma (black trace) trace). The corresponding excitation patterns imaged on a
or the principal dendrite (red trace) of the recorded rhodamin-6G thin film are shown in the black and red boxes.
neuron. Excitation parameters: λ = 405 nm, 10 ms pulses, laser power
An advantage of phase over amplitude modulation 3.5 μW at the exit of a 40x, 0.8 NA objective. Scale bars in-
is that power losses are minimised by redistributing, dicate 20 μm. Unpublished data, courtesy of A. Bègue, F.
rather than deviating or blocking, light at the sample Anselmi and V. Emiliani (Wavefront-Engineering Microscopy
plane for formation of the desired intensity profile. Group, Neurophysiology and New Microscopies Laboratory).
Furthermore, DH offers an improved axial resolution
for extended spots in comparison with large Gaus-
sian beams (Lutz et al., 2008; Zahid et al., 2010;
Vaziri and Emiliani, 2012), arising from the abil-
ity to generate large excitation areas by overfilling
the objective back aperture, exploiting its full focus-
ing strength. In contrast, large area excitation with
Gaussian beams necessitates underfilling the objec-
tive back aperture at cost of the axial confinement of
the excitation volume. Moreover, as DH is a scan-less
method, the temporal resolution of photoactivation
is imposed only by the dwell time necessitated by
optogenetic actuator kinetics: TDH = tdwell .
DH suffers two primary drawbacks: light lost to
diffraction at the SLM and intensity inhomogeneities
caused by speckle. The spatially varying diffraction
efficiency of LC-SLMs causes light loss in the for-
mation of zero and higher diffraction orders, limit-
ing the excitation field (Arrizón and Testorf, 1997;
Palima and Daria, 2006). Light sent to zero or higher
diffraction orders can be minimised by using liquid
crystal on silicon (LCOS) SLMs and, in addition, sup-
pressed through adaptation of the original phase holo-
gram (Palima and Daria, 2007; Jesacher and Booth,
2010; Ronzitti et al., 2012). The maximum excita-
tion field size for DH depends on the SLM pixel size,
α, and its demagnification at the sample plane (Golan
et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2011). In the lateral direc-
tion, it can be calculated by the following equation:
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 9
E. Papagiakoumou
have a small, single-channel conductance (∼80 fS; ChR2-expressing neurons. The obvious disadvantage
Feldbauer et al., 2009) much lower than the one of of this approach is limited temporal resolution, which
endogenous channels. Thus, the photocurrent gen- in principle could be increased by further decreasing
erated by the few channels occupying the femtoliter the NA, so that the spot focal volume simultaneously
volume of a 2P diffraction-limited spot is too small opens more channels. However, NA reduction also
to induce sufficient membrane depolarisation for the degrades axial resolution, defined as the 1/e width of
generation of APs. This limitation is especially salient the squared intensity profile in z, ωz , described for
for channels such as ChR2, for which low conduc- 2PE by Zipfel et al. (2003).
tance cannot be compensated by increasing the in- A similar approach, improving the temporal re-
tensity and duration of the illumination spot, due solution performance of scanning methods with low-
to the long lifetime of the excited conducting state. NA excitation beams, was published about a year later
Prolonged illumination with high light intensity re- (Andrasfalvy et al., 2010). Andrasfalvy et al. (2010)
sults in substantial depletion of the ground state, recuperated the lost optical confinement for the low-
with further increase yielding a saturated response NA excitation spots by temporally focusing the ex-
(Rickgauer and Tank, 2009). Furthermore, at high citation beams. Temporal focusing (TF), a technique
light intensities, out-of-focus excitation can induce originally introduced for wide-field 2P microscopy
unwanted photocurrents in other cellular compart- (Oron et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2005), permits excep-
ments or neighbouring cells that can easily exceed tional depth confinement of light for large excitation
currents excited in the small focal volume, thus off- areas. As mentioned previously, the 2PE fluorescence
setting any gains in spatial specificity. Out-of-focus signal, S2PE , is proportional to the square of the peak
2
excitation can be avoided by scanning the laser spot intensity: S 2PE ∝ I 2 = τEA , where E is the pulse
over the membrane of a target neuron at a low in- energy, τ is the pulse duration and A is the area of
tensity still sufficient to excite most available current the excitation beam. Typical spatial focusing achieves
in-focus. However, the fast (∼millisecond) deacti- optical sectioning by tightly focusing the laser beam
vation time of ChR2 prevents the adequate temporal to a very small spot, such that if spot size increases,
summation of currents generated through serial scan- optical sectioning degrades with decreasing peak in-
ning. 2P activation of ChR2 was reported for the first tensity. In contrast, TF operates through pulse dura-
time in 2008 (Mohanty et al., 2008) by recording tion modification, that is the pulse is compressed as
neuronal responses in hippocampal brain slices with it propagates through the sample, reaches its shortest
2P calcium imaging. However, the small fluorescence duration at the focal plane and stretches again as it
reported by the calcium dye indicated small ampli- propagates beyond. Thus, lost optical sectioning due
tude, sub-threshold activation. Hence, the methods to the increase of the excitation spot size is regained
for efficient yet spatially confined 2PE of ChR2 and through increased pulse duration outside of the focal
other actuators needed to be reconsidered. volume.
TF is realised experimentally with a diffrac-
Excitation by scanning approaches tion grating imaged onto the sample via a tele-
The first article reporting rigorous 2PE of ChR2 in scope formed by a regular lens and the objective
cultured neurons used a laser-scanning approach with (Figure 3A). Briefly, the grating disperses frequencies
galvanometer-driven mirrors (Rickgauer and Tank, comprising the spectrum of the femtosecond pulse
2009). To improve excitation efficiency, laser spot (typically 100 fs pulses for 2PE microscopy; band-
size was increased by decreasing the effective nu- width ∼10 nm) towards different angular directions.
merical aperture (NA) of the objective with an iris Dispersed spectral components are then collimated
placed near the back focal plane, and the spot was by the first lens and recombined at the focal plane of
scanned over a spiral trajectory to cover the whole the objective. Rays corresponding to different spec-
cell surface. With an effective NA of 0.3 (instead of tral components propagate through the imaging sys-
the objective’s nominal NA 0.8) and overall scan- tem following different optical paths, eventually re-
ning time of approximately 30 ms, Rickgauer and combining with exactly the same phase at the objec-
Tank demonstrated the first 2PE AP generation in tive focal plane, recovering the original short pulse
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 11
E. Papagiakoumou
and approximately 1.3-μm size spots at 1040 nm in both cases necessitated excessively high excita-
(Prakash et al., 2012) with much shorter photoactiva- tion power densities to efficiently excite neurons
tion time (2.3–9.5 ms). The large discrepancy in the (typical values: 38 mW/μm2 , Packer et al., 2012;
total scan time needed to evoke APs remains contra- 15–60 mW/μm2 depending on the objective used,
dictory given that both investigations used the same Prakash et al., 2012). The high excitation power de-
approach at similar excitation powers. Prakash et al. graded the realised axial resolution (Figures 4B and
demonstrated 2PE of C1V1 at depths up to 250 μm 4C), theoretically reaching micrometer precision for
in vivo, as well as 2PE of ChR bistable variants (ChR2- such a small excitation spot and increases the risk of
C128T or C128A) and the microbial rhodopsin pro- photodamage.
tein archaerhodopsin eArch3.0, an engineered proton Excitation with 2P diffraction-limited spots by
pump (Mattis et al., 2012) with kinetics slower than using mirror-based scanning systems has also been
the chloride pump eNpHR3.0, in cultures and brain applied to functional imaging of genetically en-
slices. The approximately 1.0-μm spot size employed coded calcium indicators, such as the widely known
GCaMP family (Mao et al., 2008; Tian et al., 2009; ventional laser scanning techniques, have hindered
Dombeck et al., 2010; Akerboom et al., 2012; Chen 2PE of genetically encoded voltage-sensitive proteins
et al., 2012), providing enhanced spatial resolution (Knöpfel, 2012).
compared with 1P scanning excitation. For volt-
age indicators, although some progress has been Parallel excitation
made with line (Fisher et al., 2008; Kuhn et al., Although parallel, patterned excitation methods
2008) and point scanning (Acker et al., 2011) and show immense promise to address the challenges
recent engineering of dyes more efficient for 2PE detailed above for both 2PE imaging and photoacti-
(Acker et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2012), photon- vation, these techniques are currently in their infancy.
counting limitations due to chromophore satura- The delay is driven by two primary causes, the first
tion during short dwell times, characteristic of con- emerging from the high complexity of the optical
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 13
E. Papagiakoumou
setup compared with mirror scanning systems, and scanning near diffraction limited spots in 2Ds while
the second from the reduced available power density. holographically changing their axial position.
As laser power is distributed across the excitation A similar approach recently has revealed benefits of
pattern, thus simultaneously illuminating larger ar- DH for optogenetics by simultaneously evoking APs
eas without loss of temporal resolution, the power from two C1V1-expressing neurons lying in planes
density is lower than if the laser was focused to a separated axially by 20 μm. The neurons were actu-
diffraction-limited spot. However, decreased power ated by raster scanning of 1-μm holographic spots in
density is easily compensated, and in fact surpassed, 2D, one in each plane (power: 30 mW per spot; Packer
as parallel excitation optimises the recruitment speed et al., 2012). The same experiments would have been
of optogenetic reporter molecules, thus decreasing impossible with objective scanning approaches com-
the excitation power density necessary to photoacti- monly utilised for 3D 2P calcium imaging (Göbel
vate, detailed as follows. et al., 2006). Indeed, objective scanning is too slow for
simultaneous stimulation of cells in separate planes,
Amplitude modulation even those expressing C1V1 or other optogenetic ac-
The low efficiency of amplitude modulation methods tuators with kinectics prolonged specifically for scan-
due to light rejection has thus far prevented their use ning systems.
with 2PE. Especially for DMDs, the maximisation Two-photon DH offers an alternative to single-spot
of diffraction efficiency requires their implementa- scanning stimulation of optogenetic actuators with
tion at a specific angle, which critically depends on extended arbitrarily shaped patterns. Although this
the illumination wavelength. Thus, although experi- illumination approach has yet to be demonstrated,
ments in two different wavelengths in 1PE have been preliminary experiments in our laboratory confirm its
successful (Wang et al., 2007b; Sakai et al., 2013), feasibility. Moreover, the efficiency of using extended
the use of DMDs in combination with broadband or patterns to activate ChR2 in 2P has been validated
tunable light sources is not straightforward. with a different phase modulation technique, gener-
alised phase contrast (GPC; Papagiakoumou et al.,
Phase modulation 2010).
Thus far, DH has been implemented in 2PE both for GPC (Glückstad, 1996) belongs to the category
the generation of multiple near diffraction-limited of the interferometric phase visualisation techniques
spots (Nikolenko et al., 2008; Daria et al., 2009) and for which the output image is obtained by the in-
extended excitation patterns (Papagiakoumou et al., terference between a signal and a reference wave,
2008; Dal Maschio et al., 2010). As large excita- travelling along the same optical axis. The most well-
tion areas suffer the disadvantage of degraded axial known example of interferometric phase visualisation
confinement, in 2008, we ameliorated the axial re- is Zernike’s phase contrast method (Zernike, 1955),
solution by combining DH with TF, although the which represented a breakthrough for medicine and
rapidly varying phase of the holographic beam wave- biology by rendering transparent organisms clearly
front slightly distorts colour recombination at the discernible under the microscope through the visu-
focal plane of the objective in comparison to smooth alisation of small phase perturbations with a Fourier
wavefronts, such as those of Gaussian beams (Fig- plane phase-shifting filter. The GPC method is an ex-
ure 3B). With this technique, we generated scan-less, tension of Zernike’s phase-contrast into the domain
depth-resolved excitation in arbitrary illumination of full range [0, 2π] of phase variations (Glückstad
configurations, independently of the excited area size and Mogensen, 2001). Briefly, a desired target inten-
(Papagiakoumou et al., 2008, 2009). Indeed, DH has sity map is converted into a binary [0, π] phase map
already proven useful for 2P uncaging applications that modifies the input beam wavefront via the LC-
(Nikolenko et al., 2008; Dal Maschio et al., 2010; SLM. The beam modulated by the LC-SLM is then fo-
Go et al., 2012) and furthermore shows potential cused on a patterned phase contrast filter (PCF) plate
for fast imaging applications (Papagiakoumou et al., imposing appropriate phase retardation between the
2009). Recently, a phase-only SLM was coupled to a on-axis focused component (non-diffracted light) and
standard 2P scanning microscope for inertia-free 3D the higher order Fourier components (Figure 5A).
morphological imaging (Dal Maschio et al., 2011), Lastly, the interference between these two beams
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 15
E. Papagiakoumou
Temporally focused GPC (TF-GPC) patterns tation beam resulting in aberrated spots or, in the
mapped over the somatic surface reliably excited case of large excitation beams, interference of ballis-
neurons in mouse cortical slices, demonstrating for tic photons from adjacent illumination areas trans-
the first time the feasibility of simultaneously acti- form the intensity profile into a speckle pattern. The
vating multiple neurons or neuronal compartments latter effect can also decrease the axial resolution,
with patterns mapped onto separate dendrites, at especially for temporally focused beams (Dana and
low excitation power densities (0.3–0.6 mW/μm2 ). Shoham, 2011, 2012a). Adaptive optics can improve
The decreased power density enabled better preser- propagation of diffraction-limited spots through scat-
vation of the lateral and axial resolution than the tering samples (Rueckel et al., 2006; Vellekoop and
scanning methods that direct the power used to a Mosk, 2007; Débarre et al., 2009; Katz et al., 2011),
near-diffraction-limited spot (Figure 4D). Moreover, which has been especially useful for morphological
the broad focal volume of large-surface spots, and the imaging and other highly aberration-sensitive appli-
increased out-of-focus pulse duration by using TF cations. However, the limits on temporal resolution
reduces the chances to cause photodamage, even if imposed by lengthy computation times have thus far
we have to increase the total average power that is outweighed potential benefits of utilising adaptive
sent to the sample (Hopt and Neher, 2001) with cells optics for optogenetics applications.
sustaining to long-duration illumination protocols Interestingly, recent experimental and theoretical
(Papagiakoumou et al., 2010). studies on the propagation of temporally focused large
Gaussian beams (Dana and Shoham, 2011, 2012a)
and extended GPC-generated patterns through scat-
Perspectives and outlook tering media (Papagiakoumou et al., 2013) revealed
Optogenetics has been introduced in the field of neu- that even fine details of the excitation shape are
roscience during the last decade, and it has been well preserved deep in scattering tissue, maintaining
quickly adopted by scientists. Efforts to expand opto- good axial confinement up to one to two scattering
genetic tool capabilities have spurred innovations in lengths. The robustness to scattering of temporally
genomic tool discovery, molecular engineering, opsin focused patterns can be attributed to the spectral ‘self-
targeting and optical-device development. Although healing’: each spectral component dispersed by the
numerous optogenetic studies have provided impor- grating acquires its own speckle pattern, as it prop-
tant insights into neural function and dysfunction, agates through slightly different optical path than
complex interrogation and manipulation of neural the rest of the spectral frequencies in the scattering
circuits demands more flexible, controllable and spa- medium. These uncorrelated speckle patterns inter-
tiotemporally precise illumination methods, imple- fere, smoothing out the intensity profile (Oron et al.,
mentable in 2PE. Despite the progress in optical de- 2012; Papagiakoumou et al., 2013). Thus, tempo-
velopments for optogenetics over the past five years, rally focused patterns propose a powerful method to
scientists continue to improve their performances by overcome scattering without introducing extracom-
encountering the limitations of the techniques. putation time or power losses.
An important issue, for instance, when working An interesting application of patterned illumina-
in depth, both in vitro and in vivo, is scattering in- tion can be for in vivo activation in freely moving
duced by the tissue. 2PE has become the most widely animals with flexible fibre bundle image-transferring
implemented method thus far to overcome scatter- endoscopes (Bozinovic et al., 2008). Fibre transmis-
ing, as the scattered part of the beam, weak and sion of intensity patterns provides a more practical
temporally stretched outside the focus, contributes solution than transmitting the phase map because
little to the 2PE signal. In addition, the longer wave- multi-mode fibres randomise the phase, amplitude
length used decreases scattering (Oheim et al., 2001). and polarisation of the transmitted light. However,
Even so, the signal decreases exponentially with depth developers recently succeeded in transmitting CGHs
(S 2PE ∝ e −2z/ S , where s is the mean free path be- through multimode optical fibres by implementing
tween two scattering events, or else scattering length; a direct search algorithm to modulate the phase,
Helmchen and Denk, 2005). Moreover, scattering concentrating the output light power to one or
strongly distorts the optical wavefront of the exci- more spots (Di Leonardo and Bianchi, 2011). CGH
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 17
E. Papagiakoumou
make them a complementary tool to optogenetic ap- Arrenberg, A.B., Stainier, D.Y.R., Baier, H. and Huisken, J. (2010)
proaches in order to enhance the characterisation and Optogenetic control of cardiac function. Science 330, 971–974
Arrizón, V. and Testorf, M. (1997) Efficiency limit of spatially quantized
manipulation of mammalian circuit properties and Fourier array illuminators. Opt. Lett. 22, 197–199
functions. Ashkin, A. and Dziedzic, J.M. (1987) Optical trapping and
manipulation of viruses and bacteria. Science 235, 1517
In this review, the illumination methods used so Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J.M., Bjorkholm, J.E. and Chu, S. (1986)
far in optogenetic applications were examined, dis- Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for
cussing the advantages and limitations of each, in or- dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290
Axelrod, D. (1981) Cell–substrate contacts illuminated by total
der to help readers to choose strategies well adapted to internal reflection fluorescence. J. Cell Biol. 89, 141–145
their specific experimental parameters. As evidenced Banghart, M., Borges, K., Isacoff, E., Trauner, D. and Kramer, R.H.
throughout, the method selected from among those (2004) Light-activated ion channels for remote control of neuronal
firing. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1381–1386
presented should be well adapted to the reporter and Bernstein, J., Garrity, P. and Boyden, E. (2011) Optogenetics and
desired scale (sub-cellular, cellular, networks, in vivo). thermogenetics: technologies for controlling the activity of targeted
cells within intact neural circuits. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 61–71
Botcherby, E.J., Juskaitis, R., Booth, M.J. and Wilson, T. (2007)
Acknowledgements Aberration-free optical refocusing in high numerical aperture
microscopy. Opt. Lett. 32, 2007–2009
The author thanks A.J. Foust, A. Bègue, E. Ronzitti Botcherby, E.J., Smith, C.W., Kohl, M.M., Débarre, D., Booth, M.J.,
and V. Emiliani for useful comments on the Juskaitis, R., Paulsen, O. and Wilson, T. (2012) Aberration-free
manuscript and D. Oron for his contribution to three-dimensional multiphoton imaging of neuronal activity at kHz
rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 2919–2924
Figure 3. Bozinovic, N., Ventalon, C., Ford, T. and Mertz, J. (2008)
Fluorescence endomicroscopy with structured illumination. Opt.
Express. 16, 4603–4610
Conflict of interest statement Bruegmann, T., Malan, D., Hesse, M., Beiert, T., Fuegemann, C.J.,
Fleischmann, B.K. and Sasse, P. (2010) Optogenetic control of
The author has declared no conflict of interest. heart muscle in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Methods 7, 897–900
Bundschuh, S.T., Zhu, P., Schärer, Y.-P.Z. and Friedrich, R.W. (2012)
Dopaminergic modulation of mitral cells and odor responses in the
References zebrafish olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 32, 6830–6840
*Articles of special interest Busskamp, V., Duebel, J., Balya, D., Fradot, M., Viney, T.J., Siegert,
Acker, C.D., Yan, P. and Loew, L.M. (2011) Single-voxel recording of S., Groner, A.C., Cabuy, E., Forster, V., Seeliger, M., Biel, M.,
voltage transients in dendritic spines. Biophys. J. 101, L11–L13 Humphries, P., Paques, M., Mohand-Said, S., Trono, D., Deisseroth
Adamantidis, A.R., Zhang, F., Aravanis, A.M., Deisseroth, K. and De K., Sahel J.A., Picaud S. and Roska B. (2010) Genetic reactivation
Lecea, L. (2007) Neural substrates of awakening probed with of cone photoreceptors restores visual responses in retinitis
optogenetic control of hypocretin neurons. Nature 450, 420–424 pigmentosa. Science 329, 413–417
*Akemann, W., Mutoh, H., Perron, A., Rossier, J. and Knöpfel, T. Buzsáki, G. (2004) Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat.
(2010) Imaging brain electric signals with genetically targeted Neurosci. 7, 446–451
voltage-sensitive fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 7, 643–649 Callaway, E.M. and Katz, L.C. (1993) Photostimulation using caged
Akerboom, J., Chen, T.-W., Wardill, T.J., Tian, L., Marvin, J.S., Mutlu, glutamate reveals functional circuitry in living brain slices. Proc.
S., Calderón, N.C., Esposti, F., Borghuis, B.G., Sun, X.R., Gordus, Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7661–7665
A., Orger, M.B., Portugues, R., Engert, F., Macklin, J.J., Filosa, A., Cardin, J.A., Carlén, M., Meletis, K., Knoblich, U., Zhang, F.,
Aggarwal, A., Kerr, R.A., Takagi, R., Kracun, S., Shigetomi, E., Deisseroth, K., Tsai, L.-H. and Moore, C.I. (2009) Driving
Khakh, B.S., Baier, H., Lagnado, L., Wang, S.S., Bargmann, C.I., fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory
Kimmel, B.E., Jayaraman, V., Svoboda, K., Kim, D.S., Schreiter, responses. Nature 459, 663–667
E.R. and Looger, L.L. (2012) Optimization of a GCaMP calcium Chanda, B., Blunck, R., Faria, L.C., Schweizer, F.E., Mody, I. and
indicator for neural activity imaging. J. Neurosci. 32, 13819–13840 Bezanilla, F. (2005) A hybrid approach to measuring electrical
*Andrasfalvy, B.K., Zemelman, B.V., Tang, J. and Vaziri, A. (2010) activity in genetically specified neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 8,
Two-photon single-cell optogenetic control of neuronal activity by 1619–1626
sculpted light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 11981–11986 Chen, Q., Cichon, J., Wang, W., Qiu, L., Lee, S.-J.R., Campbell, N.R.,
Anikeeva, P., Andalman, A.S., Witten, I., Warden, M., Goshen, I., DeStefino, N., Goard, M.J., Fu, Z., Yasuda, R., Looger, L.L.,
Grosenick, L., Gunaydin, L.a, Frank, L.M. and Deisseroth, K. (2012) Arenkiel, B.R., Gan, W.B. and Feng, G. (2012) Imaging neural
Optetrode: a multichannel readout for optogenetic control in freely activity using Thy1-GCaMP transgenic mice. Neuron 76, 297–308
moving mice. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 163–170 Čižmár, T. and Dholakia, K. (2011) Shaping the light transmission
*Anselmi, F., Ventalon, C., Bègue, A., Ogden, D. and Emiliani, V. through a multimode optical fibre: complex transformation analysis
(2011) Three-dimensional imaging and photostimulation by and applications in biophotonics. Opt. Express. 19, 18871–18884
remote-focusing and holographic light patterning. Proc. Natl. Čižmár, T. and Dholakia, K. (2012) Exploiting multimode waveguides
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 19504–19509 for pure fibre-based imaging. Nat. Commun. 3, 1027
Aravanis, A.M., Wang, L.P., Zhang, F., Meltzer, L.A., Mogri, M.Z., Collot, M., Loukou, C., Yakovlev, A.V, Wilms, C.D., Li, D., Evrard, A.,
Schneider, M.B. and Deisseroth, K. (2007) An optical neural Zamaleeva, A.I., Bourdieu, L., Leger, J.-F., Ropert, N., Eilers, J.,
interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated Oheim, M., Feltz, A. and Mallet, J.M. (2012) Calcium Rubies: a
fiberoptic and optogenetic technology. J. Neural Eng. 4, family of red-emitting functionalizable indicators for two-photon
S143–S156 Ca2+ imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 14923–14931
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 19
E. Papagiakoumou
*Helmchen, F. and Denk, W. (2005) Deep tissue two-photon Li, D., Hérault, K., Isacoff, E.Y., Oheim, M. and Ropert, N. (2012)
microscopy. Nat. Methods 2, 932–940 Optogenetic activation of LiGluR-expressing astrocytes evokes
Hirase, H., Nikolenko, V., Goldberg, J.H. and Yuste, R. (2002) anion channel-mediated glutamate release. J. Physiol. 590,
Multiphoton stimulation of neurons. J. Neurobiol. 51, 237–247 855–873
Hopt, a and Neher, E. (2001) Highly nonlinear photodamage in Liesener, J., Reicherter, M., Haist, T. and Tiziani, H.J. (2000)
two-photon fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 80, Multi-functional optical tweezers using computer-generated
2029–2036 holograms. Opt. Commun. 185, 77–82
Huber, D., Petreanu, L., Ghitani, N., Ranade, S., Hromadka, T., Lin, J.Y., Lin, M.Z., Steinbach, P. and Tsien, R.Y. (2009)
Mainen, Z. and Svoboda, K. (2008) Sparse optical microstimulation Characterization of engineered channelrhodopsin variants with
in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice. improved properties and kinetics. Biophys. J. 96, 1803–1814
Nature 451, 61–64 Liu, X., Ramirez, S., Pang, P.T., Puryear, C.B., Govindarajan, A.,
Jesacher, A. and Booth, M.J. (2010) Parallel direct laser writing in Deisseroth, K. and Tonegawa, S. (2012) Optogenetic stimulation of
three dimensions with spatially dependent aberration correction. a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature 484,
Opt. Express. 18, 21090–21099 381–385
Jesacher, A., Maurer, C., Schwaighofer, A., Bernet, S. and Losavio, B.E., Iyer, V. and Saggau, P. (2009) Two-photon microscope
Ritsch-Marte, M. (2008) Full phase and amplitude control of for multisite microphotolysis of caged neurotransmitters in acute
holographic optical tweezers with high efficiency. Opt. Express. brain slices. J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 064033
16, 4479–4486 Losonczy, A., Zemelman, B.V, Vaziri, A. and Magee, J.C. (2010)
Kasparov, S. and Herlitze, S. (2013) Optogenetics at a crossroads? Network mechanisms of theta related neuronal activity in
Exp. Physiol. 98, 971–972 hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 13,
Katona, G., Szalay, G., Maák, P., Kaszás, A., Veress, M., Hillier, D., 967–972
Chiovini, B., Vizi, E.S., Roska, B. and Rózsa, B. (2012) Fast *Lutz, C., Otis, T.S., DeSars, V., Charpak, S., Digregorio, D.A. and
two-photon in vivo imaging with three-dimensional random-access Emiliani, V. (2008) Holographic photolysis of caged
scanning in large tissue volumes. Nat. Methods 9, 201–208 neurotransmitters. Nat. Methods 5, 821–827
*Katz, L.C. and Dalva, M.B. (1994) Scanning laser photostimulation: a Mao, T., O’Connor, D.H., Scheuss, V., Nakai, J. and Svoboda, K.
new approach for analyzing brain circuits. J. Neurosci. Methods (2008) Characterization and subcellular targeting of GCaMP-type
54, 205–218 genetically-encoded calcium indicators. PLoS One 3, e1796
*Katz, O., Small, E., Bromberg, Y. and Silberberg, Y. (2011) Focusing Matar, S., Golan, L. and Shoham, S. (2011) Reduction of two-photon
and compression of ultrashort pulses through scattering media. holographic speckle using shift-averaging. Opt. Express. 19,
Nat. Photon. 5, 372–377 25891–25899
Kleinlogel, S., Feldbauer, K., Dempski, R.E., Fotis, H., Wood, P.G., Mattis, J., Tye, K.M., Ferenczi, E.a, Ramakrishnan, C., Shea, D.J.O.,
Bamann, C. and Bamberg, E. (2011) Ultra light-sensitive and fast Prakash, R., Gunaydin, L.a, Hyun, M., Fenno, L.E., Gradinaru, V.,
neuronal activation with the Ca2+ -permeable channelrhodopsin Yizhar, O. and Deisseroth, K. (2012) Principles for applying
CatCh. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 513–518 optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of
Knapczyk, M. and Krishnan, A. (2005) High-resolution pulse shaper microbial opsins. Nat. Methods 9, 159–172
based on arrays of digital micromirrors. IEEE Photonic. Tech. L. 17, McAlinden, N., Massoubre, D., Richardson, E., Gu, E., Sakata, S.,
2200–2202 Dawson, M.D. and Mathieson, K. (2013) Thermal and optical
Knöpfel, T. (2012) Genetically encoded optical indicators for the characterization of micro-LED probes for in vivo optogenetic
analysis of neuronal circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 687–700 neural stimulation. Opt. Lett. 38, 992–994
Ko, H., Hofer, S.B., Pichler, B., Buchanan, K.a, Sjöström, P.J. and *Miesenböck, G. (2009) The optogenetic catechism. Science 326,
Mrsic-Flogel, T.D. (2011) Functional specificity of local synaptic 395–399
connections in neocortical networks. Nature 473, 87–91 Mohanty, S.K., Reinscheid, R.K., Liu, X., Okamura, N., Krasieva, T.B.
Kravitz, A.V, Freeze, B.S., Parker, P.R., Kay, K., Thwin, M.T., and Berns, M.W. (2008) In-depth activation of channelrhodopsin
Deisseroth, K. and Kreitzer, A.C. (2010) Regulation of parkinsonian 2-sensitized excitable cells with high spatial resolution using
motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. two-photon excitation with a near-infrared laser microbeam cell
Nature 466, 622–626 culture. Biophys. J. 95, 3916–3926
Kuhn, B., Denk, W. and Bruno, R.M. (2008) In vivo two-photon Nagel, G., Brauner, M., Liewald, J.F., Adeishvili, N., Bamberg, E. and
voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals top-down control of cortical Gottschalk, A. (2005) Light activation of channelrhodopsin-2 in
layers 1 and 2 during wakefulness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. excitable cells of Caenorhabditis elegans triggers rapid behavioral
105, 7588–7593 responses. Curr. Biol. 15, 2279–2284
Lee, J.H., Durand, R., Gradinaru, V., Zhang, F., Goshen, I., Kim, D.-S., Nagel, G., Szellas, T., Huhn, W., Kateriya, S., Adeishvili, N., Berthold,
Fenno, L.E., Ramakrishnan, C. and Deisseroth, K. (2010) Global P., Ollig, D., Hegemann, P. and Bamberg, E. (2003)
and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective
by type and wiring. Nature 465, 788–792 membrane channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100,
*Leifer, A.M., Fang-Yen, C., Gershow, M., Alkema, M.J. and Samuel, 13940–13945
A.D.T. (2011) Optogenetic manipulation of neural activity in freely Nakai, J., Ohkura, M. and Imoto, K. (2001) A high signal-to-noise
moving Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Methods 8, 147–152 Ca(2+) probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein. Nat.
*Levitz, J., Pantoja, C., Gaub, B., Janovjak, H., Reiner, A., Hoagland, Biotechnol. 19, 137–141
A., Schoppik, D., Kane, B., Stawski, P., Schier, A.F., Trauner, D. and Nguyen, Q.T., Callamaras, N., Hsieh, C. and Parker, I. (2001)
Isacoff, E.Y. (2013) Optical control of metabotropic glutamate Construction of a two-photon microscope for video-rate Ca(2+)
receptors. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 507–516 imaging. Cell Calcium 30, 383–393
Li, N., Downey, J.E., Bar-Shir, A., Gilad, A.a, Walczak, P., Kim, H., *Nikolenko, V., Watson, B.O., Araya, R., Woodruff, A., Peterka, D.S.
Joel, S.E., Pekar, J.J., Thakor, N.V. and Pelled, G. (2011) and Yuste, R. (2008) SLM microscopy: scanless two-photon
Optogenetic-guided cortical plasticity after nerve injury. Proc. Natl. imaging and photostimulation with spatial light modulators. Front.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 8838–8843 Neural Circuit. 2, 5
C 2013 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 21
E. Papagiakoumou
Stuart, G., Schiller, J. and Sakmann, B. (1997) Action potential Yan, P., Acker, C.D., Zhou, W.-L., Lee, P., Bollensdorff, C., Negrean,
initiation and propagation in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. A., Lotti, J., Sacconi, L., Antic, S.D., Kohl, P., Mansvelder, H.D.,
Physiol. 505(Pt 3), 617–632 Pavone, F.S. and Loew, L.M. (2012) Palette of fluorinated
Suchowski, H., Oron, D., Silberberg, Y., Suchowski Oron, D. and voltage-sensitive hemicyanine dyes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
Silberberg, Y.H. (2006) Generation of a dark nonlinear focus by 109, 20443–20448
spatio-temporal coherent control. Opt. Commun. 264, 482–487 *Yang, S., Papagiakoumou, E., Guillon, M., De Sars, V., Tang, C.M.
Tian, L., Hires, S.A., Mao, T., Huber, D., Chiappe, M.E., Chalasani, and Emiliani, V. (2011) Three-dimensional holographic
S.H., Petreanu, L., Akerboom, J., McKinney, S.a, Schreiter, E.R., photostimulation of the dendritic arbor. J. Neural Eng. 8, 46002
Bargmann, C.I., Jayaraman, V., Svoboda, K. and Looger, L.L. Yizhar, O., Fenno, L.E., Davidson, T.J., Mogri, M. and Deisseroth, K.
(2009) Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with (2011) Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron 71, 9–34
improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat. Methods 6, 875–881 Zahid, M., Velez-Fort, M., Papagiakoumou, E., Ventalon, C., Angulo,
Tsai, H.C., Zhang, F., Adamantidis, A., Stuber, G.D., Bonci, A., De M.C. and Emiliani, V. (2010) Holographic photolysis for multiple cell
Lecea, L. and Deisseroth, K. (2009) Phasic firing in dopaminergic stimulation in mouse hippocampal slices. PLoS One 5,
neurons is sufficient for behavioral conditioning. Science 324, e9431
1080–1084 Zemelman, B., Lee, G., Ng, M. and Miesenböck, G. (2002) Selective
Vaziri, A. and Emiliani, V. (2012) Reshaping the optical dimension in photostimulation of genetically chARGed neurons. Neuron 33,
optogenetics. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 128–137 15–22
Vellekoop, I.M. and Mosk, A.P. (2007) Focusing coherent light through *Zemelman, B.V, Nesnas, N., Lee, G.a and Miesenbock, G. (2003)
opaque strongly scattering media. Opt. Lett. 32, 2309–2311 Photochemical gating of heterologous ion channels: remote
Volgraf, M., Gorostiza, P., Numano, R., Kramer, R.H., Isacoff, E.Y. and control over genetically designated populations of neurons. Proc.
Trauner, D. (2006) Allosteric control of an ionotropic glutamate Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 1352–1357
receptor with an optical switch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 47–52 Zernike, F. (1955) How I discovered phase contrast. Science 121,
*Wang, K., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Guo, Y., Song, P., Zhang, X., Zeng, S. and 345–349
Wang, Z. (2011) Precise spatiotemporal control of optogenetic *Zhang, F., Gradinaru, V., Adamantidis, A.R., Durand, R., Airan, R.D.,
activation using an acousto-optic device. PLoS One 6, e28468 De Lecea, L. and Deisseroth, K. (2010) Optogenetic interrogation
Wang, H., Peca, J., Matsuzaki, M., Matsuzaki, K., Noguchi, J., Qiu, of neural circuits: technology for probing mammalian brain
L., Wang, D., Zhang, F., Boyden, E., Deisseroth, K., Kasai, H., Hall, structures. Nat. Protoc. 5, 439–456
W.C., Feng, G. and Augustine, G.J. (2007a) High-speed mapping Zhang, Y., Holbro, N. and Oertner, T.G. (2008) Optical induction of
of synaptic connectivity using photostimulation in plasticity at single synapses reveals input-specific accumulation of
Channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. alphaCaMKII. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 12039–12044
A. 104, 8143–8148 Zhang, J., Laiwalla, F. and Kim, J. (2009) Integrated device for optical
Wang, S., Szobota, S., Wang, Y., Volgraf, M., Liu, Z., Sun, C., Trauner, stimulation and spatiotemporal electrical recording of neural
D., Isacoff, E.Y. and Zhang, X. (2007b) All optical interface for activity in light-sensitized brain tissue. J. Neural Eng. 6,
parallel, remote and spatiotemporal control of neuronal activity. 055007
Nano Lett. 7, 3859–3863 Zhang, Y.P. and Oertner, T.G. (2007) Optical induction of synaptic
Wang, J., Wagner, F., Borton, D.a, Zhang, J., Ozden, I., Burwell, R.D., plasticity using a light-sensitive channel. Nat. Methods 4,
Nurmikko, A.V, Van Wagenen, R., Diester, I. and Deisseroth, K. 139–141
(2012) Integrated device for combined optical neuromodulation Zhang, F., Wang, L.P., Boyden, E.S. and Deisseroth, K. (2006)
and electrical recording for chronic in vivo applications. J. Neural Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells. Nat.
Eng. 9, 016001 Methods 3, 785–792
Watt, A.J., Cuntz, H., Mori, M., Nusser, Z., Sjöström, P.J. and Zhang, F., Wang, L.P., Brauner, M., Liewald, J.F., Kay, K., Watzke, N.,
Häusser, M. (2009) Traveling waves in developing cerebellar cortex Wood, P.G., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., Gottschalk, A. and Deisseroth,
mediated by asymmetrical Purkinje cell connectivity. Nat. K. (2007) Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry.
Neurosci. 12, 463–473 Nature 446, 633–639
Wilson, N.R., Runyan, C.a, Wang, F.L. and Sur, M. (2012) Division Zhu, P., Fajardo, O., Shum, J., Zhang Schärer, Y.-P. and Friedrich,
and subtraction by distinct cortical inhibitory networks in vivo. R.W. (2012) High-resolution optical control of spatiotemporal
Nature 488, 343–348 neuronal activity patterns in zebrafish using a digital micromirror
Wilt, B.A, Burns, L.D., Wei Ho, E.T., Ghosh, K.K., Mukamel, E.A and device. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1410–1425
Schnitzer, M.J. (2009) Advances in light microscopy for *Zhu, G., Van Howe, J., Durst, M., Zipfel, W. and Xu, C. (2005)
neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 435–506 Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing of femtosecond
Witten, I.B., Lin, S.-C., Brodsky, M., Prakash, R., Diester, I., pulses. Opt. Express. 13, 2153–2159
Anikeeva, P., Gradinaru, V., Ramakrishnan, C. and Deisseroth, K. Zipfel, W.R., Williams, R.M. and Webb, W.W. (2003) Nonlinear magic:
(2010) Cholinergic interneurons control local circuit activity and multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat. Biotechnol. 21,
cocaine conditioning. Science 330, 1677–1681 1369–1377
Wyart, C., Del Bene, F., Warp, E., Scott, E.K., Trauner, D., Baier, H. Zorzos, A., Boyden, E.S. and Fonstad, C.G. (2010) A multi-
and Isacoff, E.Y. (2009) Optogenetic dissection of a behavioural waveguide implantable probe for light delivery to sets of
module in the vertebrate spinal cord. Nature 461, 407–410 distributed brain targets. Opt. Lett. 35, 4133–4135
Received: 9 December 2012; Accepted: 12 June 2013; Accepted article online: 18 June 2013