Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Case 10

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Chapter 13: BNY Mellon Shares the Wealth with Employees

When Congress passed a corporate tax cut that took effect in 2018, employees and
economists alike speculated about where the increase to companies’ bottom lines would
be directed. Would more wealth flow to employees in the form of pay increases or to
investors in the form of dividends paid out or investments aimed at increasing
companies’ value? And would any money directed to employees go mainly to
executives or be shared with employees at all levels?
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation chose a path that demonstrated concern for
multiple stakeholders. The bank - which focuses on serving large banks, mutual funds,
and other big investors - announced that the tax reduction would add more than $400
million to income of $1.13 billion. Most of the additional after-tax income would be split
between increasing corporate value and paying employees more. CEO Charles Scharf,
in a memo to employees, described the decision in terms of social responsibility: “We
strongly believe in our responsibility to our employees to share the tax benefit from a
lower tax rate, as well as to invest as much as we intelligently can to build the company
for the future so we can serve our clients, communities and shareholders for the long
term.”
On the corporate-value side, BNY Mellon said it would add more to its planned
investments in technology projects aimed at improving the company’s future
performance. Investors who had hoped the company would provide them with a more
immediate benefit such as bigger dividends were disappointed, as evidenced by a dip in
the bank’s stock price. Other banks, including Bank of America and U.S. Bancorp, had
announced they would use most of their additional income to improve returns for
stockholders. However, as BNY Mellon moved into the next year with a strong financial
performance, stock prices recovered and rose.
BNY Mellon’s additional spending on employees took the form of an increase in entry-
level pay to $15 per hour. The increase mainly affected about 1,000 employees in the
operations unit out of 52,500 employees overall. The plan was in noticeable contrast to
many employers’ decisions to pay one-time bonuses rather than raising pay levels.
BNY Mellon also indicated that it would continue with plans made before the tax cut.
These included cost-saving efforts that would reduce the size of the workforce and
consolidate it in a smaller headquarters. The company also had planned to pay
dividends and buy back stock, transferring some of its value to investors.

Questions
1. BNY Mellon used its additional profits to increase entry-level pay levels rather
than offering incentive pay such as merit increases or bonuses. What
advantages of incentive pay was the bank forgoing?
 Advantage of incentive pay
o Higher performance
o Individual/ group- team work/ organization

2. What HR-related goal might the bank meet by raising entry-level pay instead of
paying a one-time bonus?
 Entry-level pay is increased-> sustainable income:
o Attract more employees
o Reduce turn over( more satisfied)
o

You might also like