The Hypertrophy Handbook
The Hypertrophy Handbook
The Hypertrophy Handbook
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without
the written permission of the author, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or
reviews. Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further
information may have changed or disappeared between the time this book was written and when it is read.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the author has used his best efforts and knowledge in
researching and preparing this book, he makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy
or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaims any implied warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales
representatives or promotional sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be
suitable for your particular situation. You should always consult with a medical professional before beginning
any exercise program.
The contents of this e-book are not intended for the treatment or prevention of any disease or medical
condition, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. The author is not
a licensed healthcare provider or a registered dietitian. Utilizing the information within this e-book is at the
sole choice and risk of the reader. If you engage in this exercise program, you agree that you do so at your own
risk, are voluntarily participating in these activities, assume all risk of injury to yourself, and agree to release
and discharge the publisher and the author from any and all claims or causes of action, known or unknown,
arising out of the contents of this book.
The author advises you to take full responsibility for your safety and to know your limits. Before practicing the
skills described in this book, be sure that your equipment is well maintained and do not take risks beyond your
level of experience, aptitude, training, and comfort level.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 The 6 Pure Bodybuilding Principles
28 Progress Tracking
31 Muscle Anatomy
39 FAQ
49 References
The 6 Pure
Bodybuilding
Principles
progress through the program, we’ll be putting these 6 key principles to use.
1 . T e n s i o n o v e r e v e r y t h i n g
to get bigger.
remaining principles.
2 . T e c h n i q u e
The Negative
A controlled, slightly slower negative is a pillar of good technique. I was at the gym today, looked around and
noticed how many people just let the weight fall during the negative. Most people seem much more concerned
with “getting the weight up” than they are with lowering it back down under control. But getting the weight up
is most likely less important than lowering it back down. Research indicates that the eccentric (negative)
phase is more important for hypertrophy than the concentric (positive) phase of a lift. So, if you’re one of
those people who tends to just let the weight free fall on the negative, in this program, really focus on resisting
Another good cue I like to think about on the negative is treating it as if it were a “failed positive.” On every rep,
you’re not just lowering the weight, you’re resisting it . It’s kind of like you’re trying to push the weight up, but it
still keeps moving down against your might. The idea is to really feel the muscle streeettttchhhhhhhh as you
lower the weight back down. This will create much more eccentric tension than just allowing the weight to free
fall.
More and more research is pointing toward the idea that full range of motion isn’t always better per se, but
rather getting to the deepest, most-stretched aspect of the range of motion is what really matters [3]. In other
words, the stretch is, for the most part, more important than the squeeze. The bottom half of a squat is more
important than the top half of a squat. The bottom half of a cable curl is more important than the top half of a
cable curl. You need to get the muscle stretched while lifting. When performing the exercises in this program,
regularly ask yourself if you’re getting a deep stretch at the bottom. If not, you may be missing out on some
gains!
Momentum
Another thing I’ve been noticing a lot at the gym is that most people do quite a lot of cheating on their form –
too much cheating. Again, it seems as if they just want to get the weight up. It’s as if the lifters are thinking
that as long as they can get the weight from A to B, it’s mission accomplished. The problem, though, is that
you can get the weight from A to B without actually applying much tension to the target muscle. Take bicep
curls, for example. If I “curl” the weight up while leaning forward and backward, I’m most definitely taking
loads of tension away from the biceps and dispersing it onto the lower back. This isn’t ideal. On each exercise,
we want to always be in control of the weight. This generally means minimizing momentum and swinging
while keeping our target muscle in mind.
Form Consistency
Another point worth mentioning is that you should do your absolute best to keep your form consistent from
week to week. As you add weight or reps, it will be tempting to alter your form for the sake of “progression.”
This is a kind of fake progression though. If you just got other muscles involved by cheating the weight up, you
didn’t actually apply any additional tension to the target muscle. It’s better to keep the form in check than
increase the weight at all costs. We’re putting technique over weight in this program … always.
You need to push sets hard to maximize muscle growth. And, unfortunately, research consistently shows that
most people simply don’t push sets hard enough to do that [4]. It’s common to see people at the gym going
year after year but making no noticeable progress. In most cases, this isn’t because they’ve maxed out their
natural muscular potential. Rather, it’s because they simply aren’t pushing their sets close enough to failure to
stimulate new hypertrophy. Beyond the beginner stage, triggering muscle growth will be uncomfortable. You
can’t just go through the motions. You need to really grind some reps out. Of course, “just showing up” to the
gym will reap all kinds of wonderful mental health benefits, may increase strength, improve metabolic health,
and prevent muscle wasting. That’s great, but this is a pure bodybuilding program and “just showing up” won’t
be enough to build new tissue. For that, you need to really make the muscle work. And it needs to be hard.
So how hard is hard enough? The answer to that question isn’t black-and-white because, to some extent, it
depends on the specific exercise you’re doing and how much volume you’re doing. But one more-or-less fool
proof way to ensure that you’re training hard enough is to push most sets either to failure or about one rep shy
of failure. In fact, a new meta-analysis suggested that as one gets closer to failure, one tends to see more
hypertrophy [5]. This trend can be seen in the figure below, where there is a clear increase in growth as you get
closer and closer to 0 reps in reserve (0 RIR).
-0.6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Estimated Proximity to Failure (RIR)
Reps in reserve (RIR) and muscle size according to Robinson et al, 2023
Let’s see what experts and high-level bodybuilding coaches are saying.
You’ll hear two main lines of reasoning from experts in this area.
One camp argues against failure. They say that going to failure often isn’t worth it because it limits the amount
of volume you can do. Failure training is very fatiguing and imposes a greater recovery demand. Because of
this, if you constantly go to failure, you simply won’t be able to recover from as much volume as if you left a
rep or two in the tank. Also, studies do consistently show that volume matters for muscle growth, up to a
point. All else being equal, increasing volume usually increases muscle growth, up to a point [7, 8]. If the
research on failure is mixed, but the research on volume is clearly positive, it seems that maybe we should
prioritize volume over failure after all.
Hmmmm...
Another camp of experts would dispute this. They would argue that, sure, volume does matter, but failure
matters more. It’s better to push your sets to failure and let the volume naturally land at a level that allows you
to still recover. In other words, rather than letting volume be the driver, let intensity (effort) be the driver. Don’t
sacrifice intensity for volume, they would say.
Well, this program offers at least one potential solution that gets the best of both worlds. This is the
philosophy we will be using around failure in this program.
The fact that there is high-quality evidence showing that failure is substantially better than non-failure training
for muscle growth, we’d better make sure we have at least some failure training in our program. If we never
ever go to failure, we’d almost certainly be leaving gains on the table. But does this mean every single set must
be all the way to failure? I don’t think so. I think there’s also some merit to the argument that too much failure
training can impair volume tolerance. Too much failure training may also impose an unnecessary injury risk,
especially on certain exercises. So here’s the solution:
We’re going to break down all of our working sets into “Early Sets” and “Last Sets”. Early Sets refer to every
working set other than the very last set.
For example, most exercises in this program will have 3 sets. In this case, sets 1 and 2 are the Early Sets and
set 3 is the Last Set. If an exercise calls for 4 sets, sets 1, 2 and 3 would be the Early Sets and Set 4 would be
the Last Set. If an exercise calls for 2 sets, set 1 would be the Early Set and set 2 would be the Last Set. It’s
worth mentioning that Early Sets are NOT warm-up sets. Warm-up sets are separate and to be done before the
Early Sets. Dividing working sets into Early Sets and Last Sets is simply a way for us to apply different intensity
levels to different working sets.
For the Early Sets, we’ll generally avoid going all the way to failure, usually stopping with ~1 rep left in the tank.
In the program, I’ll refer to this as an RPE of 9-10, which simply means that you didn’t quite get all the way to
failure and you might have had 1 more rep in the tank, but certainly no more than that.
In case anyone is confused, let me back-up and explain RPE in a little more detail. Here’s a very quick primer
on RPE.
RPE stands for Rating of Perceived Exertion. It may sound fancy, but it’s extremely simple once we break the
acronym down. RPE is your rating of how you perceived your exertion on a set. In other words, you rate how
hard the set felt on the scale of 1-10, and that’s your RPE. Usually, to make the scale a bit more objective,
coaches will set up the RPE scale based on how many reps you think you had left in the tank. For example, if
you think you had 0 reps left in the tank, that would correspond to an RPE of 10. If you think you had 1 rep left
in the tank, that would correspond to an RPE 9. And so on down the line. I’ll break it down in more detail in the
table below. Even if you’re very familiar with RPE, I’d recommend reading through the table as some of the
information is unique to this program.
8 wasn’t a super hard set, but will still program. You won’t find it in the Push Pull
certainly stimulate hypertrophy. Legs or pper Lower versions of the
U
You could’ve done 4 more if you really RPE 6 work is only included on Early Sets
6 tried. for Paused RDLs in the ull Body version
F
of the program.
To summarize this further, we’ll essentially be taking the Last Set of most exercises to failure (RPE 10) and
taking the Early Sets to an RPE 9-10 most of the time. On exercises where there’s either a higher recovery cost
or injury risk, we will stay a bit further from failure, usually in the RPE 8-9 range, depending on the specific
exercise and the program variant.
By reserving failure for the last set of each exercise, we’ll strike the best balance of volume and intensity.
You may also notice that in the program I use a “~” sign before most RPE ratings to imply that your RPE
estimates will never be perfectly accurate. This sign denotes that being off by about 1 RPE unit is totally
normal. Just do your best to be within +/- 1 RPE of the assigned RPE. Also, you can use the Last Set of most
exercises to see how accurate you were with your Early Set RPEs by sending it all the way to failure and
comparing it to how many reps you got for the previous sets.
4 . P r o g r e s s i v e o v e r l o a d
instead of a fixed rep count. For example, if the program calls for 3 sets of 10-12
reps on Hammer Preacher Curls (as it does), you’ll pick a weight that will
sufficiently challenge you for either 10, 11 or 12 reps. Let’s say you get 10 reps on
all 3 sets in Week 1. In Week 2, you will try to add a rep to at least one of those
sets. Over the coming few weeks, try to max out the rep range by getting 12 reps
on all 3 sets. Only once you’ve maxed out the rep range you should add some
weight and then reduce reps back down to the bottom of the range. Coaches refer
to this as double progression since we are progressing both reps and weight, in
that order.
Adding weight
There are a few exercises in this program where we’ll be adding weight at a fixed
rep count (i.e. there is no rep range and no rep progression). Leg Press, RDLs and
Tricep Bar Pressdowns are a few examples. In this case, you’ll keep the reps the
same and try to add weight when you can, without sacrificing form.
On all other exercises, only add weight once you’ve maxed out the top end of the
Improving form Even if you can’t add some reps or weight during a given week, you can always do
Improving the If you can’t add reps or weight, you can focus on feeling the muscle working
mind-muscle better. Improving the mind-muscle connection is most likely not as effective as
adding reps, weight or improving form at increasing tension, but research has
connection
shown that the mind-muscle connection can increase hypertrophy in some cases
isolation exercises where adding reps and weight may become impractical at a
5. High-Tension E x e r c i s e s
You’ll quickly notice that this program is not a powerbuilding/strength program. There are many machine-
based and cable-based exercises and only a select few free-weight movements. Even the over-hated and
under-appreciated Smith Machine makes a number of appearances over a free weight barbell option (gasp!).
Why is this?
Well, first of all, the best evidence shows that machines are at least equally effective as free weights in
Machines also generally require fewer warm-up sets. This means you can get to your working sets faster
without wasting time and energy doing as many non-stimulative warm up sets. For example, when I do
barbell back squats, I usually need to do 4-5 warm-up sets before I feel ready to hit my first working set.
However, on Hack Squats or Smith Machine Squats, I feel ready to tackle my working sets after only 2-3
warm-up sets. That means less time and energy spent doing work that isn’t helping with muscle growth
and more time and energy spent on the good stuff.
But when it comes to our main goal with this program specifically, which is to build muscle, I do believe that
machines have a slight edge in most instances. That said, there are a few cases where free weight exercises
are included. There are RDLs in this program, dumbbell presses, dips, and some free weight arm exercises. But
overall, you will notice that machines and cables are emphasized.
However, just in case you don’t have access to machines and cables, for every exercise, I’ve included at least
one free weight substitution option. Making these substitutions will absolutely allow you to still get the job
done and make great gains while running this program with minimal equipment.
Beyond an emphasis on exercises that have high stability and good tension profiles, this program also
prioritizes exercises with a long length muscle bias. This means we’ll be focusing on exercises that load the
muscle while it is being stretched. Examples of very long-length biased exercises include Paused Dips, Paused
RDLs, Behind-The-Back Cuffed Cable Lateral Raises, Bayesian Cable Curls, and plenty more.
6 . I n t e n s i t y T e c h n i q u e s
Intensity techniques are also a big part of this program. In fact, there is a full column in the program dedicated
to the intensity technique we’ll be using on the last set of each exercise. If you’ve run any of my programs
before, you’ll know that this is a new addition that I’m really excited about.
Long-length Partials
As another example, if we’re doing long-length partials on a lying leg curl, we would do partial reps in the
bottom half of the curl, where the leg is more straight rather than more bent.
More and more research is showing that the stretched/lengthened aspect of the lift is better for hypertrophy
than the squeezed/shortened aspect of the lift [3]. Long-length partials allow us to spend more time in the
most hypertrophic aspect of the range of motion.
IMPORTANT! Note that when long-length partials are included in the program, they are to be performed on every rep
of the last set for an exercise. For example, on Day 1 we are doing 3 sets of 10-12 reps on cross-body lat pull-
arounds. On set 1 and 2, we will use a full range of motion on all reps as normal. Then on set 3, we will do long-
length partials on ALL 10-12 reps. So long-length partials are NOT being done to extend the set beyond failure in this
program, but rather they are to be done on every rep of the last set only, when listed under the intensity technique
column.
Myo-reps
This 2019 study and this 2022 study both found that
inter-set stretching can enhance muscle growth for Do another 3-4 reps
A dropset is when you drop the weight back and perform more reps at the end of a set. For example, in this
program we’ll be doing a dropset on the overhead tricep extension (and a few other exercises). Here’s how
You finish your last set and get 10-12 reps with 60 lbs
After finishing your last rep, immediately drop the weight back by 20-30% (in this case, you drop the weight
back to 45 lbs)
Perform however many more reps until you get to failure again with good form
In this program, we'll be doing small dropsets, not big dropsets. It’s generally smarter to drop the weight back
by a small amount so that you only get another few reps. This way, we can guarantee that all of the extra
dropset reps are actually effective and you’re not wasting a bunch of time and effort doing “ineffective”
dropset reps that are far from failure. So when doing dropsets in this program, only drop the weight back by
Mechanical Dropsets
A mechanical dropset is similar to the traditional dropset explained above, except instead of dropping the
weight back, you make the exercise easier by strategically modifying your technique in some way. This
technique modification will allow you to squeeze out some extra reps. For example, we’ll be doing a
mechanical dropset on the Cable Reverse Flye for the rear delts in this program by taking a step toward the
cable machine at set rep intervals. This is probably more easily understood by watching this video.
Integrated Partials are a type of long-length partial where, instead of doing all of the reps in a set as partial
reps, you integrate them throughout the set by alternating between full ROM reps and long-length partial reps.
This is what integrated partials will look like on the pec deck in this program:
Do 1 rep with full ROM
Do 1 rep with partial ROM (do a half rep in the stretched aspect)
Do 1 rep with partial ROM (do a half rep in the stretched aspect)
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
4. Here you will find exercise-specific coaching cues. Always read the notes before doing your warm-up sets
7. Early set RPEs are often a tough lower than last set RPE. See handbook for an explanation of RPE.
8. Two substitution options for each exercise. If you can't do the exercise listed feel free to swap it for either
one of these.
How you split up your training days throughout the week will depend on which version of the program you are
running.
If you are running the Full Body version of the program, your split may look like this:
If you are running the Upper/Lower version of the program, your split may look like this:
Monday Upper #1
Tuesday Lower #1
this:
Monday Pull #1
Tuesday Push #1
Wednesday Legs #1
Friday Rest
Saturday Pull #2
Sunday Push #2
Monday Legs #2
workouts.
Sunday Arms & Weak Points #1
As you can see above, you will not hit the same exact workout on each day of the week and the workouts will
run on a 9-day cycle instead of the usual 7-day cycle. You will also notice that in the program there is an
optional rest day included between Push workouts and Legs workouts. If you feel that you are not recovering
well (very sore, tired, etc.) then please take this optional rest day. In this case, the workouts will run on an 11-
Which split should you run? This is mostly a matter of scheduling and personal preference. The overall volume
and exercise selection is very similar between all three versions of the program. If you have all three versions
of the program, I would suggest running all three and monitoring which one works best for you. The push/pull/
legs and upper/lower versions of the program will be appropriate for people of any level of training
advancement without any serious recovery considerations. The full body version of the program is a touch
trickier because you will be hitting some of the same muscle groups on consecutive days. To avoid recovery
issues, it is important to stay away from failure on most exercises for the first two weeks of the full body
program. Outside of this consideration, I would suggest watching this video if you are unfamiliar with high
An important aspect of bodybuilding is building up lagging muscles. To accomplish this, in each version of the
program you will find a “Weak Points & Arms” day where you will pick two exercises from the table below
depending on the individual weak point you’re trying to improve the most.
IMPORTANT! For the Exercise #1 and Exercise #2 options simply pick ONE of the three listed options. Do not do all
3 options listed each day.
Feel free to rotate these exercises from week to week, if you wish, as long as you are still tracking your load
and reps and aiming to progressively overload over the long term.
Pick one of the options above. Do not do all of Pick one of the options above. Do not do all of
them in one day! them in one day!
Hamstrings There is a lot of hamstrings volume in this program. If they are a weak point for
you, simply focus on executing the exercises listed with your best effort and
execution rather than adding more volume.
Calves Rather than adding more calf training volume, focus on the execution of the
sets given in the program first. Ensure you are pausing at the bottom of each
rep and reaching a high level of effort. Feel free to sprinkle in 1-2 extra sets per
exercise if they are a major priority for you.
Mid-Back (“Back There is a lot of mid-back volume in this program. If this is a weak point for
Thickness”) you, simply focus on executing the exercises listed with your best effort and
execution rather than adding more volume. Really focus on squeezing your
shoulder blades together on the positive and feeling your back pull apart on the
negative when doing mid-back focused rows.
Upper Traps The upper traps shouldn’t require a high level of volume to grow, especially
when there is a lot of mid-back work. Before adding sets, focus on the
execution of the sets given in the program first. Ensure you are squeezing your
traps at the top of each rep and reaching a high level of effort. Feel free to
sprinkle in 1-2 extra sets per exercise if they are a major priority for you.
Abs The abs shouldn’t require a high level of volume to grow. If you are wanting to
see your abs, your diet will be mainly responsible for lowering your level of
abdominal fat to allow them to show through. Before adding sets, focus on the
execution of the sets given in the program first. Ensure you are allowing your
lower back to round on crunches and leg raises as you squeeze your abs. Feel
free to sprinkle in 1-2 extra sets per exercise if they are a major priority for you.
Biceps Because there is a dedicated arm day in this program and the biceps will get
plenty of indirect work back exercises, adding even more sets would probably
not be productive and would most likely fall under the “junk volume” category.
Triceps Because there is a dedicated arm day in this program and the triceps will get
plenty of indirect work from pressing, adding even more sets would probably
not be productive and would most likely fall under the “junk volume” category.
Some exercises are listed as supersets. This means you are to perform these exercises at the same time,
alternating sets back and forth. This is simply done to save on time. If you have more time to train you don’t
need to do them as supersets. It shouldn’t impact the effectiveness of the sets either way.
For any supersets in the program, you do not need Do 10 reps of assisted pull-ups (Set 1)
to go immediately from one exercise to the next. I’d
recommend resting 0.5-1 minute between each Rest 0.5-1 min
superset. So, in practice, our supersets should look
something like this: Do 10 reps of assisted dips (Set 1)
Rest 0.5-1 min
Do 10 reps of assisted pull-ups (Set 2)
Rest 0.5-1 min
Do 10 reps of assisted dips (Set 2)
Rest 0.5-1 min
Do 10 reps of assisted pull-ups (Set 3)
Rest 0.5-1 min
Do 10 reps of assisted dips (Set 3)
Move on to the next exercise
For each exercise, there are two alternative substitution options given. Here is a list of suitable reasons for
making a substitution:
You really dislike the main exercise (but love one of the substitutions)
You just don’t “feel” the main exercise working at all, even after giving it an honest shot for several weeks (and
you do “feel” one of the substitutions really well)
Here is a list of less suitable reasons for making a substitution:
You haven’t done the main exercise before (no better time than now to learn! Watch the exercise demo and
give it a shot!)
Someone at your gym is using the main exercise (instead of swapping, move onto a different exercise and
come back to it later. If it’s still unavailable and that’s derailing your workout, then you can feel free to make
the swap).
The main exercise is harder than one of the substitutions. Don’t be tempted to always go for the easiest
exercise option! Your hard work will pay off.
You can substitute either Option 1 or Option 2. They aren’t arranged so that Option 1 is necessarily better than
Option 2; they are just different options!
T r a i n i n g B l o c k s
This program is split into two training blocks: a Build Block and a Novelty Block. Each block lasts 5 weeks.
Both blocks have the same overarching goal: maximum hypertrophy. The main difference between the two
blocks is exercise selection. As the name implies, the Novelty Block is intended to introduce some new
exercises, rep schemes and intensity techniques to create a new stimulus for continued growth into the
second half of the program.
Week 5 is a semi-deload week and separates the two training blocks. Training volume is slightly decreased
during this week and the RPEs are lowered on most exercises. Avoid going to failure this week and instead
focus on your technique and mind-muscle connection.
Pure Bodybuilding
Gear
Please note that all of the Amazon links
and Rise links below are affiliate links. I will
get a small commission if you purchase
any items from these links. While I greatly For a limited time, receive 20% off for Jeff's Pure Bodybuilding Launch Learn More
Level of Exercises to
Gear Link Why
importance use on
Angles 90 Link Allow for more secure grip Low-Moderate Lat focused
Handles and better mind-muscle pulldowns and lat-
Cheaper connection on pulling focused rows
Option exercises.
Liquid Chalk Link Prevent grip slipping from Moderate-high Any exercise that
sweaty palms. Usually allows relies on grip
for more reps and/or strength (usually
increased loading. pulling exercises
like rows, pullups,
RDLs, etc.)
Lifting Straps Link Prevents grip from being a Moderate-high Most back
limiting factor on heavy pulls, exercises and
allowing you to overload the RDLs
target muscles better.
Cable Triceps Link Long ropes allow you to get a Low-Moderate Rope facepulls,
Attachment bigger range of motion on triceps diverging
certain exercises.
pressdown
Wrist Cuffs Link These ankle straps can be Moderate-high Cuffed behind-the-
used as wrist cuffs for the back lateral raises,
cuffed lateral raises cable hip
throughout the program. The abductions, cable
cuffs will prevent your hip adductions
forearms from taking over on
lateral raises and often helps
improve the mind-muscle
connection. They can also be
used to do cable hip ab/
adductions.
Lacrosse Balls Link Holding onto two lacrosse Low (personal Cuffed behind-the-
balls during cuffed lateral preference) back lateral raises
raises can improve tactile
sensation and for some
people makes the movement
feel better than having your
hands floating with nothing
to hold onto.
1 . S t r e n g t h p e r f o r m a n c e ( p r o g r e s s i v e o v e r l o a d )
The single best indicator that you’re gaining muscle is if you’re gaining strength in the gym. This doesn’t mean
your 1 rep max strength, but rather your strength within the rep ranges given in the program (usually around
8-15 reps). If you are either lifting more weight or doing more reps at the same weight within the rep ranges
given in the program, you’re most likely adding muscle. This is why it’s really important that you track your
weight and reps used for as many exercises as possible while running the program. Not only will tracking your
performance keep you accountable to “beat the logbook,” it will serve as a reliable proxy for physique progress
(which can be harder to gauge visually, especially as you get more advanced).
2 . P r o g r e s s p h o t o s
Since getting more jacked is the goal, progress photos will be the most direct method of measuring progress.
However, depending on your level of advancement, you may not notice visual progress in photos as easily or
quickly as you will strength progress in the gym. For this reason, I suggest taking progress roughly once every
2-3 months and ideally no more than once a week.
When taking progress photos, ensure that you use the same camera, background and lighting whenever
possible. Remember to take at least one photo from the front, side, and rear.
Bodyweight is a surprisingly useful tool for tracking progress when used in combination with the other two. On
its own, it can be deceptive because it doesn’t tell you if you’re gaining weight from fat, water, or muscle.
However, when used alongside the other two tools, some common sense reasoning can give you a very good
idea of what type of tissue you’re gaining. For example, if you’re getting stronger, you’re looking more jacked in
your photos, and your bodyweight is increasing at an appropriate rate, you can rest assured that the weight
you’re gaining is muscle. However, if you aren’t getting stronger, you’re looking significantly softer/flatter in
your pics, and your weight is increasing rapidly, then you’re most likely gaining fat.
Gaining roughly 1-2% of your bodyweight per month will ensure that you are gaining mostly muscle. For
example, if you currently weigh 170 lbs (77 kg), gaining ~1.7-3.4 lbs (0.7-1.5 kg) per month will ensure that
most will be lean mass. Generally speaking, the slower you gain, the leaner it will be.
If you have simultaneous fat loss goals while running this program, you will need to be either in a caloric
deficit or at caloric maintenance. Generally speaking, for fat loss, I suggest losing weight no faster than 0.5-1%
of your bodyweight per week. For example, if you currently weigh 220 lbs (100 kg), as you cut, aim to lose
1.1-2.2 lbs (0.5-1 kg) per week to retain as much muscle as possible. If your goal is body recomposition, aim
to roughly maintain your body weight while using progress photos and strength gain as your main guide for
progress.
While tracking your weight, be careful not to get too consumed with individual weigh-ins. Single weigh-ins can
be impacted by water fluctuations, digestion changes, sleep disruptions, how late you ate the night before and
a number of other short-term factors. Instead, observe weekly trends. If you take more than one weigh in per
week, get the weekly average and compare weekly averages for a more accurate representation of how your
weight is trending.
There is a much more detailed explanation of body recomposition in my nutrition guide on the topic.
While other tools for tracking body composition such as calipers, DEXA scans and other bodyfat testing
devices can be useful in some situations, given their low accuracy and high error margins, I generally don’t
recommend using them for tracking progress [16]. The three tools outlined above will be plenty for getting the
job done and fully informing you on whether or not you’re moving in the right direction.
C H E S T
L A T S
The lats are worked with any exercise that pulls the arm
down to the front or in from the side. The lats are often
B I C E P S
S H O U L D E R S
( F r o n t, S i d e & R e a r D e lt o i d s )
The biomechanical function of the upper traps is still the matter of ongoing scientific debate. Most experts
contend that the upper traps don’t actually elevate the scapula (like in a traditional shrug) because the muscle
fibers of the upper traps run much more horizontally than vertically. Instead of pulling the shoulders up, they
actually rotate the scapula up. The simple implication of this is that the traps would be better targeted by
shrugging “up and in” instead of straight up. Of course, even if this is fully true, there are still other muscles on
top of the shoulders that are responsible for shrugging the shoulders, such as the levator scapulae, and they
will still grow in response to shrugging exercises. Regardless, we will be using cable shrug-ins, Kelso Shrugs,
and super-ROM lateral raises in this program as our main exercises for targeting the upper traps. However, it is
worth keeping in mind that many of the upper trap fibers will assist with horizontal rows, lateral raises
(especially super-ROM raises), and will be worked isometrically on Romanian deadlifts.
Here is a list of exercises we’ll be using in this program to target the upper traps: Cable Paused Shrug-In, Kelso
Shrug, and Super-ROM Lateral Raises.
I should note that I didn’t include direct neck work in this program simply because most people aren’t interested
in direct neck training. However, if you are interested in incorporating direct neck training into this program, I’d
recommend watching this video for suggested exercises. Even just adding 3 sets of neck extension and 3 sets of
neck flexion 1-2x per week should be enough to gain muscle size in your neck, if you are new to training it or
haven’t been training it consistently.
G L U T E S
C A LV E S
In the context of this program, by the “abs” we’re referring to the rectus abdominis, also known as the 6-pack.
The main function of the 6-pack is to round the spine. This will happen in exercises that bring the upper torso
down toward the legs (like in a crunch) and in exercises that bring the legs up toward the upper torso (like in a
leg raise). Both are included in this program. There’s also some direct work for the transverse abdominis and
obliques, although these muscles will play an important stabilizing role in many exercises throughout the
program.
Here is a list of exercises we’ll be using in this program to target the abs: Cable Crunch, Roman Chair Leg
Raise, Ab Wheel Rollout, Cable Crunch, Stomach Vacuums, Medicine Ball Russian Twists.
aren’t the most efficient tools for getting the job done when the
ones given, you can feel free to make a substitution for a similar
Q: I can only train 4x per week. How should I modify the program?
A: If you are running the Push Pull Legs version of the program, simply take an extra rest day and it will
become a 4x per week asynchronous split (i.e. you will hit the workouts on the same days each
Note that you can feel free to rearrange the rest days to best fit your weekly work schedule.
If you are running the Full Body version of the program, there are two ways to convert it to a 4x per
week program. The first option is to simply add an extra rest day between any of the workout days
and it will become a 4x per week asynchronous split (i.e. you will hit the workouts on different days
each week). For example:If you are running the Full Body version of the program, there are two ways
to convert it to a 4x per week program. The first option is to simply add an extra rest day between
any of the workout days and it will become a 4x per week asynchronous split (i.e. you will hit the
workouts on different days each week). For example:
Week 1 Week 2
Monday Full 4
Tuesday Rest
Friday Full 1
Saturday Full 2
Sunday Rest
The other option would be to simply skip the Weak Points/Arms day. If you don’t have any obvious
weak points that you want to work on and you don’t really care about giving your arms extra
attention, you can replace this workout with another rest day and simply run the full body workouts
4x per week as written.
If you are running the Upper/Lower version of the program, there are also two ways to convert it to a
4x per week program. The first option is to simply add an extra rest day between any of the workout
days and it will become a 4x per week asynchronous split (i.e. you will hit the workouts on different
days each week). For example:
Week 1 Week 2
Monday Lower 2
Tuesday Rest
Friday Upper 1
Saturday Lower 1
Sunday Rest
The other option would be to simply skip the Weak Points/Arms day. If you don’t have any obvious
weak points that you want to work on and you don’t really care about giving your arms extra
attention, you can replace this workout with another rest day and simply run the upper/lower
workouts 4x per week as written.
A: I wouldn’t recommend it. I’ve been running this program as an advanced-elite level natural
bodybuilder with over 15 years of serious lifting experience, and the volume feels perfect to me. The
volumes included in this program are also in line with science-based recommendations from high
level natural bodybuilding coaches. If you are more advanced than me, you can consider adding 1-2
sets per week for a specific body part that you feel needs a little extra love. However, before turning
to increase the volume, I would first ensure that your intensity/effort is on point. Are you truly
pushing the last set to failure on most exercises, as suggested in the program? On these sets, are
you pushing yourself as hard as you possibly can, as if $1,000,000 was on the line, and despite this
maximum effort, you still can’t get the weight up with good form? This should be your first course of
action, before turning to a volume increase. I suspect that the volume is not too low for >99% of
people running this program. If it feels too low, you may not be executing the sets to the exertion
level that I’ve prescribed in the program.
Q: Can I choose to do a Substitution Option even if I can perform the original exercise?
A: Try to do the main exercise listed if you can. I spent a lot of time curating the main exercises in this
program and I do think they have some unique advantages in terms of tension profile, long muscle-
length bias, and stimulus-to-fatigue ratio. However, if you don’t have access to the equipment to
perform the main exercise, absolutely feel free to make a substitution. Also, if you try the main
exercise for a few weeks and just aren’t feeling it, try one of the substitution options instead. The
program was designed so that all substitution options will elicit a very similar training effect.
A: No. Generally speaking, longer rest periods are associated with better hypertrophy because resting
longer in between sets allows you to recover more and perform more volume as a result. The most
important thing is that you feel recovered between sets. However, you also don’t want to rest so long
that you lose focus and the workout starts dragging on. You can time yourself in between sets if that
helps keep you on track, but just keeping a rough eye on the clock is fine too.
A: Yes. Try not to completely scramble the workout, but switching a few exercises around won’t
severely interfere with your ability to recover in between exercises and complete the workout
properly.
A: How you respond to training will be largely determined by genetic factors and your specific training
history (i.e. how close you are to your genetic limit). As a rough ballpark estimate for untrained male
individuals, 1-2 lbs of muscle gain per month is reasonable (12-24 lbs of muscle gained in your first
year). For early intermediates with about 1 year of lifting experience, progress will likely slow down
to roughly 0.5-1 lbs of muscle gain per month (6-12 lbs of muscle gained in your second year).
Beyond that, muscle gain from person to person will be highly variable, depending on how much
you’ve already been optimizing your training and nutrition. For practical purposes, women can divide
muscle gain estimates in half.
Q: I’m not getting sore from my workouts. Is the program not working?
A: Muscle soreness is not required for hypertrophy to occur and it isn’t even a reliable proxy that you
had an effective workout. Plenty of activities can make your muscles sore, but be wholly ineffective
at building muscle, such as running a marathon or getting a “charlie horse”. In fact, reduced
soreness over time can be a good thing as it may indicate that your body is adapting and recovering.
If you are pushing yourself hard, executing the exercises with good form and being consistent with
the workouts, soreness isn’t something you need to be chasing.
Q: I’m getting very sore from my workouts. Should I skip the gym until I’m not sore?
A: You may experience increased soreness when you first begin the program because it is presenting a
new stress to your body. Some research shows that foam rolling can help reduce soreness [17, 18].
So, if you are consistently getting sore week after week, consider adding a short 3-5 minute foam
rolling routine at the end of the workouts. Otherwise, training while sore is not inherently problematic
for muscle growth. If you’re having a difficult time getting into position for any of the planned
exercises, or finding it difficult to complete a full ROM due to soreness, it would be wise to skip that
exercise until you feel properly recovered. Otherwise, in the case of mild soreness, perform a slightly
longer warm-up for each exercise and use your own discretion as to whether you should complete
the exercise or leave it for another day.
A: Changing exercises from week to week is more likely to flatten out the strength progression curve.
Within each 4-5 week block, exercises are kept mostly constant to ensure both progression (by
adding volume incrementally to these specific movements) and mastery of exercise form and
technique. Then, after 4-5 weeks, the exercises and the exercise order are switched up to keep
things fresh and novel.
A: The main point of cardio from a bodybuilding standpoint is to establish a caloric deficit for fat loss. I
would recommend prioritizing the deficit from your diet first, rather than relying heavily on cardio.
As a general rule, I recommend keeping cardio to an effective minimum on this program. If you wish
to do cardio to achieve your fat loss goals or for general health and fitness, try to keep it to 4-5 low-
moderate intensity sessions per week, around 20-30 minutes in duration. High intensity cardio
should be used more sparingly, up to once or twice weekly at your own discretion. Cardio won’t kill
your gains, but it can interfere with your recovery if performed excessively. Monitor your own
recovery, and if you’re progressing fine, then whatever cardio you’re doing isn’t a big deal. If your
progress is slowing and you feel very fatigued during or after workouts, you may want to cut back on
the cardio.
Q: I am doing the full body version of the program. Is it overtraining to hit some of the same muscles
on back to back days?
A: Overtraining occurs when your training demands consistently exceed your body’s ability to recover
over time.
First of all, true overtraining is pretty rare. When it does occur, it doesn’t just “happen” all of a sudden.
There are all sorts of warning signs that can hint toward overtraining territory including: a clear and
continued loss of progress in strength/size, disturbed sleep, persistently achy joints and muscles
and an extreme lack of motivation to train. Regardless of what training split you are running, it is
important to pay attention to your own body’s feedback to determine if you are recovering properly
and then to adjust accordingly.
Secondly, overtraining typically results from either too much volume and/or too much intensity
(usually both). Generally speaking, most truly intermediate-advanced trainees will not experience
overtraining using the weekly set volumes in this routine, which are slightly lower than usual to allow
for increased intensity.
Additionally, the period of rest required for recovery from just 3-6 sets per muscle group is probably
much shorter than you think. For intermediate-advanced trainees, hitting the same muscle within 24
hours is perfectly viable, especially when volumes and intensities are appropriate.
Granted, I think there is slightly more of a concern for fatigue accumulation on a full body program,
even if weekly volumes are re-distributed appropriately, especially if it is a unique set-up for you. For
this reason, the RPEs are lowered for weeks 1 and 2 until you adapt to the increased training
frequency.
Remember that there is no “rule” stating that you cannot train the same muscle group on
consecutive days. In fact, most athletes tax the same muscles and the same systems on
consecutive days all the time, making muscle-heads and bodybuilders the exception to typical
athletic training practices.
A: Stay tuned to my Instagram, TikTok and YouTube so that you don’t miss the release of Phase 2!
Other than running Phase 2 (release date TBD) you have the option of running back through the
same program again, trying one of the other versions of the Pure Bodybuilding program (i.e. swap
for either the Push/Pull/Legs, Full Body or Upper/Lower version of the program) or you can try out
one of the other training splits available on my website. Feel free to contact my coaching team if you
would like some suggestions or guidance moving forward.
jeffnippard.com/contact.
As much as I love
connecting on social media, I am not able to
reliably respond to the questions I receive across
platforms so please direct any questions to the
email above. Please allow 3-5 business days for
an email reply.
Wackerhage H, Schoenfeld BJ, Hamilton DL, Lehti M, Hulmi JJ. Stimuli and sensors that initiate
skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Jan
1;126(1):30-43.
[ 2 ]
Wilk M, Zajac A, Tufano JJ. The Influence of Movement Tempo During Resistance Training on Muscular
Strength and Hypertrophy Responses: A Review. Sports Med. 2021 Aug;51(8):1629-1650.
[ 3 ]
Wolf, M., Androulakis-Korakakis, P., Fisher, J., Schoenfeld, B., & Steele, J. Partial Vs Full Range of Motion
Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Strength and
Conditioning. 2023 Aug; 3(1).
[ 4 ]
Steele J, Malleron T, Har-Nir I, Androulakis-Korakakis P, Wolf M, Fisher JP, Halperin I. Are Trainees
Lifting Heavy Enough? Self-Selected Loads in Resistance Exercise: A Scoping Review and Exploratory
Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2022 Dec;52(12):2909-2923.
[ 5 ]
Robinson ZP, Pelland JC, Remmert JF, Refalo MC, Jukic I, Steele J, and Zourdos MC, (2023). Exploring
the Dose-Response Relationship Between Estimated Resistance Training Proximity to Failure, Strength
Gain, and Muscle Hypertrophy: A Series of Meta-Regressions.
[ 6 ]
Refalo MC, Helms ER, Trexler ET, Hamilton DL, Fyfe JJ. Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-
Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2023
Mar;53(3):649-665.
[ 7 ]
[ 8 ]
Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training
volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2017
Jun;35(11):1073-1082.
[ 9 ]
Schoenfeld BJ, Vigotsky A, Contreras B, Golden S, Alto A, Larson R, Winkelman N, Paoli A. Differential
effects of attentional focus strategies during long-term resistance training. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018
Jun;18(5):705-712.
[ 10 ]
Earp JE, Angelino D, Hatfield DL, Colantuono V, Jackson ER, Morgan KD, Adami A, Melanson KJ,
Blazevich AJ. Differing hypertrophy patterns from open and closed kinetic chain training affect
quadriceps femoris center of mass and moment of inertia. Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1074705.
[ 12 ]
Evangelista AL, De Souza EO, Moreira DCB, Alonso AC, Teixeira CVS, Wadhi T, Rauch J, Bocalini DS,
Pereira PEA, Greve JMD. Interset Stretching vs. Traditional Strength Training: Effects on Muscle
Strength and Size in Untrained Individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S159-S166.
[ 13 ]
Van Every DW, Coleman M, Rosa A, Zambrano H, Plotkin D, Torres X, Mercado M, De Souza EO, Alto A,
Oberlin DJ, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ. Loaded inter-set stretch may selectively enhance muscular
adaptations of the plantar flexors. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273451.
[ 14 ]
Businari GB, Brigatto FA, de Camargo JBB, Soares EG, Braz TV, Batista DR, Col LO, Dias WG, Rosolem
JM, Prestes J, Marchetti PH, Lopes CR. Chronic Effects of Inter-Set Static Stretching on
Morphofunctional Outcomes in Recreationally Resistance-Trained Male and Female. Res Q Exerc
Sport. 2023 Jan 13:1-14.
[ 15 ]
Chaabene H, Behm DG, Negra Y, Granacher U. Acute Effects of Static Stretching on Muscle Strength
and Power: An Attempt to Clarify Previous Caveats. Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 29;10:1468.
[ 16 ]
Nuckols, Greg. “Body Composition Assessments Are Less Useful than You Think.” MacroFactor, April
20, 2023. https://macrofactorapp.com/body-composition/.
[ 17 ]
Pearcey GE, Bradbury-squires DJ, Kawamoto JE, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG, Button DC. Foam rolling for
delayed-onset muscle soreness and recovery of dynamic performance measures. J Athl Train.
2015;50(1):5-13.
[ 18 ]
Macdonald GZ, Button DC, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG. Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense
bout of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(1):131-42.