Implementation of Project Based Learning by SolidW
Implementation of Project Based Learning by SolidW
net/publication/353079563
CITATIONS READS
3 52
3 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Bastian Rikardo Parhusip on 03 February 2023.
Received May 22, 2021; Revised June 28, 2021; Accepted July 07, 2021
Abstract The objective of this study is to see an overview or analyze: (1) student learning activity during the
pandemic through online learning using the University's LMS. (2) See the improvement of students' drawing skills
in Drawing Machine II courses by using Solidwoks application. This research was conducted using Quasi
Experiment method and qualitative descriptive. Quasi Experiment design applied in this study is One group
Pretest-postest design. Data analysis techniques in this study using the help of spss application /software statistics
version 25 for Mac. The purpose of the data analysis technique is to see improved learning outcomes of Drawing
Machine II by implementing the Project Based Learning model using the Solidworks application. The data analysis
in this study uses non-parametric statistical analysis. The non-parametric statistics used in testing the average
comparison hypothesis are independent t-test samples, with wilcoxon test techniques. The results achieve that:
(1) The implementation of Project based Learning by using Solidworks in online learning during the Covid-19
pandemic is proven to increase student activity, as evidenced by the observation of activeness, readiness, and giving
rise to ideas or ideas above 90% (“Very active” category). (2) Implementation of Project based Learning by using
Solidworks in online learning is proven to improve university student skills/psychomotor knowledge. This is
indicated by the value based on the table output “Independent Samples Test” can be known that the significance
value of 0.00 < α (0.05), then the H 1 hypothesis is accepted and it can be concluded that there is a significant
difference between the average pretest and postest learning outcomes.
Keywords: E-learning, engineering drawing, mechanical drawing, learning management system
Cite This Article: Bastian Rikardo Parhusip, Taufik Wisnu Saputra, and I. Marko Ayaki, “Implementation of
Project Based Learning by SolidWorks Application in Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic.”
American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 7 (2021): 431-434. doi: 10.12691/education-9-7-6.
In the online learning applied today, the author takes (independent) without making comparisons or connecting
concrete steps so that learning can still run well, students between variables with each other, qualitative data is data
remain active and productive at home and the competence expressed in the form of words, sentences, and images. in
of students' drawing skills increases. The achievement of this study conducted by involving the entire population of
knowledge learning in this course is that students are able the. The experimental class consisted of 22 students. The
to master the process of making work drawings in quasi-experimental research scheme applied in this study
accordance with international standards, the achievement is one group pretest-postest design.
of general skills is that students are able to apply and
improve skills in accordance with the demands of industry Table 1. Research Design: One Group Pretest-Postest Design
4.0, and the achievement of special skills is that students Pretest/ Initial value Treatment Postest/ final value
are able to design and design a product that is useful for T1 X T2
the solidworks-based community environment and apply
it as society service.
The steps applied to be able to achieve the above Quasi experiment research scheme chosen for
learning achievements become a challenge for the author, consideration of the Phenomenon or Pandemic Covid-19
where the author should be able to turn the student's home that going, which resulted in all learning being done
into an image studio or drawing laboratory. learning online. This scheme is an experimental study in which the
content and media must be modified in such a way that initial stage of data collection in the form of midterm
students can take lessons online. exam results, then given treatment with the application of
Based on some obstacles that occurred in the learning Project Based Learning learning model with the help of
environment during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors Solidworks software for seven meetings and in the postest
modified the learning system and learning methods, conducted at the end of the semester exam.
namely machine drawing learning II by using Solidworks This research was conducted in the course of Drawing
Software. Solidworks is a modern design assisted Machine II in the department of Mechanical Engineering
computer program or also called Computer aided design education Faculty of Engineering Manado State
(CAD). The program allows students to mathematically University. The research time was conducted in the even
create the correct solid model of an object, which can later semester of the 2019/2020 school year. The subjects
be stored in a database. Solidworks can be used to studied in this study were the entire population of
simulate and predict the final result of a single drawn Drawing Machine II class A (5332223) which amounted
product and also contains the information needed to to 22 peoples. Since all populations are taken and used as
inspect and assemble the product (Onwubolu, [3]) research samples, this study is a Population study
Implementation of Solidworks in Machine Drawing (Suharsimi, [6]).
courses, performed using Project based learning model. The data collection techniques used in this study are: 1)
Project Based Learning is a learning activity that The test, used to measure student drawing learning
emphasizes the results of learning in the form of a product, outcomes, is given in the form of Perspective drawings,
where the result of learning is a product. products in the two-dimensional drawings and Jobsheets. Pretest results
form of Ideas, writings, objects, and articles. project based are obtained from the results of the midterm exams of
learning model is a learning model that uses the project as students at the 8th meeting, and the postest results are
the core of learning activities (Hosnan, [4]). In online taken from the results of the final exam of the semester at
learning activities, students learn independently with the the 16th meeting. 2) Non-test, which is an observation
help of youtube and online learning is conducted through sheet of students' online learning activities in the form of
the Learning Management System (LMS) at the university. research work (technical drawings) and activeness of
This LMS is a place for students to ask questions, collect students in working on and collecting project tasks that are
assignments and learn through video conferences. seen directly in the Learning Management System of
The purpose of this study is to see an overview or Manado State University.The validity of the instruments
analyze the: 1) student's active learning during the used in this study is the validity of the construct
pandemic through online learning using lstudent learning (Sukardi, [7]), explain that the validity of the construct is
activity during the pandemic through online learning using an instrument that is constructed based on aspects that will
the University's Learning management system. 2) Seeing be measured in accordance with the relevant theory, then
the improvement of students' drawing skills in the course further consulted toexperts. The validity of a construct is
Drawing Machine II. an illustration that shows the extent to which the
measuring instrument shows results that fit the theory
(Ihsan, [8]).
2. Research Method Data analysis techniques in this research using spss
statistical application/software help version 25 for Mac.
This research was performed by quasi-experimental and The purpose of data analysis techniques is to see improved
descriptive qualitative method. Experimental research learning outcomes of Drawing Machine II by
according to the authors is: an experiment conducted and implementing a solidworks application-assisted project
accompanied by one treatment or action, then assessed based learning model. Data analysis in this study using
using an instrument to see, analyze, evaluate and test non-parametric statistical analysis. Non-parametric
hypotheses. According to (Sugiyono, [5]) Descriptive statistics used in testing the average comparison
research is research conducted to determine the value of hypothesis are independent tests of t-test samples, with
independent variables, either one or more variables techniques Wilcoxon Test, significance (α) of 0.05. The
433 American Journal of Educational Research
hypothesis in this study is H0= There is no difference in 3.2. Student Practicum Learning Outcomes
the average study outcomes of students inthe pretest and
postest groups and H1= There is an average difference in The results of students' practicum study can be seen in
the results of the study masiswa pretest and postest group. the explanation below. Technical implementation of
research on PTM students class A second semester in the
department of Mechanical Engineering Education faculty
3. Results and Discussion of engineering Manado State University that is by carrying
out learning using the model of Learning Project Based
Learning assisted By Solidworks Software. Pretest grades
3.1. Students Activities
are obtained from the results of the midterm exams of
1) Student Readiness students. Experiments or treatments are conducted on
During the learning process, observations from online learning using the Learning Management System of
researchers showed that 90% of students were ready to Manado State University by applying a Project based
take part in the lesson. Judging from the presence of learning model. Each meeting is given one project as a
students, the readiness of practical tools in the form of student assignment. Tutorials using Solidworks software
Computers and Solidworks applications that have been are provided through video tutorial writers that students
installed on each student's computer. There are 10% of can see on youtube accounts. Students learn from video
students who are not ready to take drawing lessons online conferences available in the Learning Management System
due to inadequate network factors, economic factors so as well as video tutorials that the author has provided.
that students do not have computers. The follow-up given Online learning lasts seven meetings.
by the researchers to anticipate 10% of students who are 1) Normality Test Of Students Practicum Learning
not ready to take lessons is to form small groups, so that Outcomes
students can share drawing props with each other.
Table 2A. Test Of Normality
2) Take online lessons enthusiastically.
In online learning activities, researchers found that 90% Tests of Normality
of students are very enthusiastic in taking lessons. Judging Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
from the response of students when asking questions, Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
answering questions and discussing with colleagues Pretest ,213 21 ,014 ,933 21 ,155
during the lesson.
Postest ,205 21 ,021 ,931 21 ,144
3) Students' timeliness in completing assignments
Evaluate from the results of student study in the form of Table 2B. Descriptives Test Of Normality
assignments, 100% of students who in the sense of 22
students collect assignments on time and observation Descriptives
results show that the results of the assignment competent Statistic Std. Error
students Mean 71,19 2,286
4) Bring ideas and ideas to online learning. 95% Confidence Lower Bound 66,42
During online learning, students always come up with Interval for Mean Upper Bound 75,96
ideas for their independent assignments, some students 5% Trimmed Mean 71,30
ask to create energy-efficient car design drawing projects Median 75,00
to be included in national-level contests.
Variance 109,762
Pretest Std. Deviation 10,477
Minimum 50
Maximum 90
Range 40
Interquartile Range 18
Skewness -,060 ,501
Kurtosis -,409 ,972
Mean 85,48 2,096
95% Confidence Lower Bound 81,10
Figure 1. Student Group Image Results Interval for Mean Upper Bound 89,85
5% Trimmed Mean 85,78
Median 90,00
Variance 92,262
Postest Std. Deviation 9,605
Minimum 65
Maximum 100
Range 35
Interquartile Range 18
Skewness -,336 ,501
Figure 2. Student Group Image Results Kurtosis -,700 ,972
American Journal of Educational Research 434
Based on the output Table 2 "Test Of Normality" it can Based on the output Table 3 "Test of Homogenity of
be known that the significance value of kolmogorov Variances" it can be known that the value of homogeneity
smirnov kolmogorov normality test for both pretest and test results of student practicum study is greater thanα
postest variables is greater than α (0.05) with test statistics (0.05) with levene test statistics 0.122 so it can be said that
for the variable pretest 0.213 and variable postest 0.205 so the diversity of data on student practicum learning
that it can be said that both variables are normally outcomes is the same or homogeneous so that the data of
distributed, so it can be said that the data has met the student practicum learning results have met the
assumption of normality. From the outuput table assumption of homogeneity.
descriptive statistics can also be seen that the average 3) Hypothesis Test
value of postest variable is 71.9 lower than the pretest
variable of 85.48. From the standard deviation can also be Table 4. Group Statistics
seen that for both variables have a low standard deviation Group Statistics
means that the data does not deviate too much from the N Mean
Std. Std. Error
average. Deviation Mean
2) Homogenity test Of Students Practicum Learning Hasil Pretest 21 71,19 10,477 2,286
Belajar postest 21 85,48 9,605 2,096
Results
Table 3. Test of Homogenity of Variances Based on Table 5 output "Independent Samples Test" it
Test of Homogeneity of Variances can be known that the significance value is 0.00 < (0.05)
Levene
means the H1 hypothesis is accepted. It can be concluded
df1 df2 Sig. that there is a significant difference between the average
Statistic
Based on Mean ,122 1 40 ,728 pretest and postest learning outcomes. Furthermore, the
results of the output table "Independent Samples Test" can
Based on Median ,011 1 40 ,916
Hasil be known that t count is negative which is -4,606 which
Belajar Based on Median and
with adjusted df
,011 1 39,810 ,916 means that the value of the first group study results
(pretest) is lower than the value of the second group study
Based on trimmed mean ,121 1 40 ,730
results (postest), so it can be concluded that the value of
student postest learning outcomes is better than the pretest.
Table 5. Output Independent Samples Test
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
Equal variances assumed ,122 ,728 -4,606 40 ,000 -14,286
Hasil Belajar
Equal variances not assumed -4,606 39,702 ,000 -14,286
© The Author(s) 2021. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).