Nestle Case Analysis
Nestle Case Analysis
Nestle Case Analysis
Roll No. –
1. Policy commitments & Governance: Nestlé has revised its corporate policies,
standards, and commitments to incorporate relevant human rights elements. This
includes policies on responsible sourcing, employee relations, consumer
communication, and privacy.
2. Nestlé Cocoa Plan (TNCP): Nestlé launched the Nestlé Cocoa Plan (TNCP), an
initiative aimed at improving the livelihoods of cocoa farmers and addressing
issues like child labor and forced labor. Through this program, Nestlé has invested
approximately $220 million in improving the conditions of its cocoa supply chain.
3. Child Labor Monitoring and Remediation System (CLMRS): Nestlé implemented
the CLMRS to monitor and remediate child labor issues in its cocoa supply chain.
Under this system, Nestlé identified 7,443 cases of child labor in 2018 and more
than 18,283 in 2019. These figures reflect Nestlé's commitment to actively
addressing and remediating child labor cases.
5. Training and awareness: Nestlé has rolled out human rights training programs
to raise awareness among employees and develop their skills in dealing with
human rights issues. As of 2018, Nestlé had trained about 96,599 employees.
6. Risk evaluation: Nestlé has integrated human rights risks within its Enterprise
Risk Management Framework and market compliance committees.
SOURCES:
- Page 9
- Page 12
- Page 7
- Page 1
- Page 2
02. Are there any changes to its CSR strategy that you would suggest?
These changes will help Nestlé strengthen its CSR strategy, address human rights
abuses in its supply chain, and enhance its reputation as a socially and ethically
responsible company.
SOURCES:
- Page 12
- Page 1
- Page 9
- Page 2
Q3. If some shareholders complained that Nestle has been spending too little or
too much effort on CSR, what would you tell them?
Shareholders may argue that increased investment in CSR can enhance Nestlé's
reputation and brand value. The case highlights the negative publicity and legal
challenges Nestlé faced due to allegations of child and forced labor in its cocoa
supply chain. By investing more in CSR, Nestlé can mitigate reputational risks and
safeguard its brand, which is valuable in the long term.
Shareholders should be made aware of the costs associated with legal battles and
lawsuits related to CSR issues. The case mentions class action lawsuits against
Nestlé over alleged mislabeling of products as sustainable and lawsuits on child
slavery in Africa. These legal battles can be financially draining, and increased CSR
investment can help prevent or reduce such legal challenges.
3. Competitive Advantage:
Emphasize the competitive advantage that strong CSR initiatives can provide.
Companies that demonstrate a strong commitment to CSR often have a
competitive edge in attracting consumers, especially those who are ethically
conscious. Nestlé can benefit from this advantage by investing more in CSR.
Addressing Concerns of Shareholders Who Think Nestlé Spends Too Much on
CSR:
Explain that Nestlé evaluates the return on investment (ROI) on its CSR initiatives.
Effective CSR should provide a measurable ROI in terms of reputation
enhancement, risk mitigation, and consumer preference. Nestlé is likely to be
careful about ensuring that its CSR investments provide a positive return.
Nestlé has legal and ethical obligations to address labor issues and environmental
concerns. The case demonstrates that Nestlé faced legal challenges and
allegations related to child and forced labor, which require investment in CSR to
comply with legal and ethical obligations.
Share how market and regulatory pressures can necessitate increased CSR efforts.
Market trends and regulations are pushing companies toward stronger CSR
practices. Nestlé may need to adapt to these pressures to remain competitive and
avoid regulatory penalties.
Q4. What grade would you give to Nestle for its efforts thus so far to become a
socially responsible environmentally sustainable company?
Grade – B (Good)
Why Grade B:
While Nestlé has initiated some CSR efforts, there are lingering doubts about the
effectiveness and transparency of these initiatives. Critics have accused Nestlé of
"greenwashing" through TNCP.
The complexity of the supply chain is a valid challenge, but it's essential for Nestlé
to invest more in addressing these issues, especially at the bottom tiers where
forced labor is most prevalent.
- Page 9
- Page 12
- Page 1
- Page 2
Q5. What recommendations would you make to increase Nestle's triple bottom
line performance? Provide justification for these recommendations based on
the outlook for Nestle and the risks involved.
Economic:
Collaborate and Scale Up: Collaborate with industry partners and stakeholders to
expand social initiatives. This includes sharing best practices and scaling up efforts
to improve labor conditions in supply schemes and locations, contributing to
social well-being.
Environmental:
SOURCES:
- Page 12
- Page 9
- Page 2